POLYFUNCTIONALIZED MACROMOLECULAR PHOTOINITIATOR CONTAINING ALPHA-AMINOKETONE, AND PREPARATION AND APPLICATION THEREOF

Abstract

An α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator, which is prepared from a double-bond-containing α-aminoketone micromolecular photoinitiator A and a polythiol compound B through thiol-ene click reaction. A preparation of the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator and an application of the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator in the radiation curing are also provided.

Claims

1. An α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator, wherein the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator is prepared from a double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A and a polythiol compound B through thiol-ene click reaction.

2. The α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator of claim 1, wherein the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A is expressed as: ##STR00013## wherein R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are each independently C.sub.1-C.sub.18 alkyl, —(CH.sub.2).sub.r—C.sub.3-C.sub.6 cycloalkyl group or —(CH.sub.2).sub.r-phenyl, wherein r is 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4; and X is an unsubstituted alkyl, a substituted alkyl with at least one —CH.sub.2— each independently substituted with —O—, —CO—, —COO—, —OCO—, or —O—CH.sub.2—CH(OH)—CH.sub.2—O—, or absent.

3. The α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator of claim 2, wherein both R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are methyl when X is absent.

4. The α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator of claim 1, wherein the polythiol compound B is a trithiol or a tetrathiol.

5. The α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator of claim 4, wherein the polythiol compound B is selected from the group consisting of: ##STR00014## and a combination thereof.

6. The α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator of claim 1, wherein the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator is selected from the group consisting of: ##STR00015## ##STR00016## ##STR00017##

7. A method for preparing the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator of claim 1, comprising: (a) mixing the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A and the polythiol compound B to obtain a mixture; wherein a molar ratio of a carbon-carbon double bond in the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A to a thiol group in the polythiol compound B is 1:1; (b) adding an azodiisobutyronitrile (AIBN) thermal initiator or a benzoyl peroxide thermal initiator into the mixture followed by stirring under nitrogen atmosphere and reaction at 60˜100° C. for 2˜12 h to obtain a reaction solution, wherein the AIBN thermal initiator or the benzoyl peroxide thermal initiator is 0.5%˜3% of a total weight of the mixture, and whether the reaction is completed or not is determined by monitoring an absorption peak of thiol by infrared spectroscopy, and when the absorption peak of thiol is absent, it indicates completion of the reaction; and (c) subjecting the reaction solution to recrystallization to obtain the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A is expressed as: ##STR00018## wherein R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are each independently C.sub.1-C.sub.18 alkyl, —(CH.sub.2).sub.r—C.sub.3-C.sub.6 cycloalkyl group or —(CH.sub.2).sub.r-phenyl, wherein r is 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4; and X is an unsubstituted alkyl, a substituted alkyl with at least one —CH.sub.2— each independently substituted with —O—, —CO—, —COO—, —OCO—, or —O—CH.sub.2—CH(OH)—CH.sub.2—O—, or absent.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein both R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are methyl when X is absent.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein the polythiol compound B is a trithiol or a tetrathiol.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the polythiol compound B is selected from the group consisting of: ##STR00019## and a combination thereof.

12. The method of claim 7, wherein the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator is selected from the group consisting of: ##STR00020##

13. A photoinitiator composition for radiation curing, comprising: the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator of claim 1.

14. The photoinitiator composition of claim 13, wherein an excitation light source of the photoinitiator composition is ultraviolet light, visible light, or a combination thereof.

15. The photoinitiator composition of claim 14, wherein the photoinitiator composition comprises 0.01˜30 parts by weight of the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator and 100 parts by weight of a double bond-containing unsaturated compound.

16. The photoinitiator composition of claim 15, wherein the photoinitiator composition comprises 0.5˜10 parts by weight of the α-aminoketone-containing polyfunctionalized macromolecular photoinitiator and 100 parts by weight of the double bond-containing unsaturated compound.

17. The photoinitiator composition of claim 16, wherein the double bond-containing unsaturated compound is a compound or mixture whose double bonds are cross-linked by free-radical polymerization reaction; and the double bond-containing unsaturated compound is selected from the group consisting of a monomer, an oligomer, a prepolymer, a combination thereof, a copolymer thereof and an aqueous dispersion thereof.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0042] FIG. 1 shows a .sup.1H NMR spectrum of photoinitiator 1 in CDCl.sub.3 according to an embodiment of the disclosure;

[0043] FIG. 2 shows a .sup.1H NMR spectrum of photoinitiator 3 in CDCl.sub.3 according to an embodiment of the disclosure;

[0044] FIG. 3 shows photopolymerization kinetic curves of trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) monomers initiated respectively by the photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 of the same weight;

[0045] FIG. 4 shows Photo-differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of TMPTA monomers initiated respectively by the photoinitiator 1 and the photoinitiator 907 in the same number of moles;

[0046] FIG. 5 shows DSC curves of the photoinitiator 1 and the photoinitiator 907; and

[0047] FIG. 6 shows a .sup.1H NMR spectrum of a double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A prepared in Example 2 of the present disclosure in CDCl.sub.3.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0048] The double-bond-containing α-aminoketone micromolecular photoinitiator A is expressed as:

##STR00007##

and when X is an alkyl group, the photoinitiator A is commercially available. The polythiol compound B is also commercially available.

[0049] The disclosure will be further described below in conjunction with the examples.

Example 1 Preparation of Double-Bond-Containing α-Aminoketone Micromolecular Photoinitiator A

[0050] ##STR00008##

[0051] To a jacketed reaction flask were added 30.9 g of 2-morpholinyl-4′-(2-hydroxyethylthio)-2-methylpropiophenone (0.1 mol) and 300 mL of n-heptane, to which 12 g of a NaOH aqueous solution with a mass concentration of 50% and 0.3 g of tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) were dropwise added. The cooling water was supplied, and the reaction mixture was dropwise added with 50 mL of a solution of allyl bromide (0.12 mol) in n-heptane in the nitrogen atmosphere and reacted at 25° C., where the temperature of the reaction system would rise immediately after the solution was dropwise added, and was required to be controlled to below 30° C.; the dropwise addition lasted for about 30 minutes, and the reaction was performed under stirring at room temperature for 5 h. After the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) to be completed, the reaction mixture was washed twice with deionized water, dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, and subjected to rotary evaporation to remove n-heptane solvent and excess allyl bromide and drying in a vacuum oven for 24 h to obtain a viscous light-yellow sample for direct use.

[0052] The yield of the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone micromolecular photoinitiator A was 98%. MS (C.sub.19H.sub.27NO.sub.3S): m/e: 349.49; and experimental result: 350.50 (M+H.sup.+).

Example 2 Preparation of Double-Bond-Containing α-Aminoketone Photoinitiator A

[0053] ##STR00009##

[0054] To a jacketed reaction flask were added 30.9 g of 2-morpholinyl-4′-(2-hydroxyethylthio)-2-methylpropiophenone (0.1 mol) and 300 mL of anhydrous dichloromethane, to which 12.2 g of triethylamine (0.12 mol) was added. The cooling water was supplied, and the reaction mixture was dropwise added with 50 mL of methylsufonyl chloride (0.105 mol) or 50 mL of dichloromethane solution of paratoluensulfonyl chloride (0.105 mol) in the nitrogen atmosphere, and reacted at 0° C. The temperature of the reaction system would immediately rise after the solution was dropwise added, and was required to be controlled to below 5° C. The dropwise addition lasted for about 30 minutes, and the reaction was performed under stirring at 5° C. for 30 minutes and at room temperature for 2 h. After the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) to be completed, the reaction mixture was washed with 0.1 mol/L of sodium hydroxide solution, washed with saturated sodium chloride aqueous solution, washed twice with deionized water, and subjected to rotary evaporation to remove the solvent, and drying in a vacuum oven for 24 h to obtain a viscous light-yellow sample for direct use.

[0055] When R.sub.1 was methyl, the product was a methanesulfonyl-protected compound with 98% yield. MS (C.sub.17H.sub.25NO.sub.5S.sub.2): m/e: 387.51.

[0056] Experimental results: 388.52 (M+H.sup.+); .sup.1H NMR (CDCl.sub.3, 400 MHz): 8.44 (d, 2H); 7.28 (d, 2H); 4.32 (t, 2H, CH.sub.2); 3.63 (t, 4H, CH.sub.2); 3.28 (t, 2H, CH.sub.2); 2.96 (s, 3H, CH.sub.3); 2.50 (t, 4H, CH.sub.2); and 1.24 (t, 6H, CH.sub.3).

[0057] When R.sub.1 was p-methylphenyl, the product was a p-toluenesulfonyl-protected compound with 98.5% yield. MS (C.sub.23H.sub.29NO.sub.5S.sub.2): m/e: 463.61; and experimental result: 464.62 (M+H.sup.+).

[0058] Methanesulfonyl-protected product was used to prepare the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A.

##STR00010##

[0059] To a 500 mL three-neck flask were sequentially added 0.1 mol of sodium hydride, 200 mL of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) or Dimethyl Formamide (DMF), to which 38.7 g of the methanesulfonyl-protected compound (0.1 mol) dissolved in 100 mL of THF or DMF were dropwise added in the nitrogen atmosphere at room temperature and reacted under stirring for 5 h. After the reaction was monitored by TLC to be completed, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure or poured into 1000 mL water, extracted with ethyl acetate, washed with saturated salt water and deionized water, dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, and evaporated and recrystallized with ethanol/water to obtain a light-yellow powder.

[0060] The yield of the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A was 78.5%. MS (C.sub.16H.sub.21NO.sub.2S): m/e: 291.13; and experimental result: 292.14 (M+H.sup.+).

[0061] The .sup.1H NMR spectrum of the photoinitiator A were shown in FIG. 6, where the four hydrogens on the benzene ring at 8.52 and 7.35 ppm; three hydrogens on the double bond at 6.57 and 5.57 ppm; eight hydrogens on the morpholine ring at 3.69 and 2.57 ppm; and the signal peaks of six hydrogens on two methyl groups at 1.31 ppm, which indicated that the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator had been successfully synthesized.

Example 3 Preparation of Photoinitiator 1 by the Thiol-ene Click Reaction

[0062] ##STR00011##

[0063] To a 100 mL three-neck flask were sequentially added 10.47 g (30 mmol) of double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A, 3.98 g (10 mmol) of polythiol compound B, and 0.145 g of azobisisobutyronitrile to obtain a reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was vacuumized, filled with nitrogen gas for three cycles, placed in a 50° C. oil bath, stirred for 30 min, heated and reacted at 70° C. for 2 h, and heated and reacted at 90° C. for 1 h. After the absorption peak of thiol at 2570 cm-1 was absent by monitoring by infrared spectroscopy, and raw materials for thin-plate chromatography were used up, indicating completion of the reaction. The target product photoinitiator 1 was prepared from the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A and the polythiol compound B by the thiol-ene click reaction.

[0064] After the reaction was completed, the reaction mixture could be directly used to .sup.1H NMR test without purifying the reaction mixture. The 1H NMR spectrum was shown in FIG. 1. It could be seen that except for a few fragment peaks of azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN), the rest were product peaks, showing that the thiol-ene click reaction could convert almost 100% of the reactants into the target product.

[0065] .sup.1H NMR (CDCl.sub.3, 400 MHz): 8.50 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 6H, Ph); 7.28 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 6H, Ph); 4.06 (s, 6H, CH.sub.2); 3.70 (m, 18H, CH.sub.2); 3.55 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 6H, CH.sub.2); 3.20 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 6H, CH.sub.2); 2.76 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 6H, CH.sub.2); 2.59 (m, 24H, CH.sub.2); 1.86 (m, 6H, CH.sub.2); 1.48 (q, 2H, CH.sub.2); 1.33 (s, 18H, CH.sub.3); and 0.89 (t, 3H, CH.sub.3).

Example 4 Preparation of Photoinitiator 2 by the Thiol-ene Click Reaction

[0066] ##STR00012##

[0067] To a 100 mL three-neck flask were sequentially added 13.96 g (40 mmol) of double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A, 4.98 g (10 mmol) of tetra-thiol, and 0.190 g of azobisisobutyronitrile to obtain a reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was evacuated, filled with nitrogen gas for three cycles, placed in a 50° C. oil bath, stirred for 30 min, heated and reacted at 70° C. for 2 h, and heated and reacted at 90° C. for 1 h. After the absorption peak of thiol at 2570 cm-1 was absent by monitoring by infrared spectroscopy, and raw materials for thin-plate chromatography were used up, indicating completion of the reaction. The target product photoinitiator 2 was prepared from the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A and the tetra-thiol by the thiol-ene click reaction.

[0068] After the reaction was completed, the reaction mixture could be directly used to .sup.1H NMR test without purifying the reaction mixture. The 1H NMR spectrum was shown in FIG. 2. It could be seen that except for a few fragment peaks of AIBN, the rest were product peaks, showing that the tetrafunctional tetra-thiol could react almost 100%. The target product had good symmetry, there was no signal of the ethyl group of the trisubstituted target product, and the number of other peaks was a multiple of 8 and 8, which showed the purity of the reaction.

[0069] .sup.1H NMR (CDCl.sub.3, 400 MHz): 8.50 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 8H, Ph); 7.30 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 8H, Ph); 4.16 (s, 8H, CH.sub.2); 3.70 (d, 24H, CH.sub.2); 3.57 (t, J=6.0 Hz, 8H, CH.sub.2); 3.20 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 8H, CH.sub.2); 2.75 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 8H, CH.sub.2); 2.60 (t, 8H, CH.sub.2); 2.57 (d, 24H, CH.sub.2); 1.84 (m, 8H, CH.sub.2); and 1.31 (s, 24H, CH.sub.3).

Example 5 Preparation of Photoinitiator 3, Photoinitiator 4, or Photoinitiator 5 from Different Polythiol Compounds B and Corresponding α-Aminoketone-Containing Double-Bonded Micromolecular Photoinitiators A

[0070] The three reactions have the same steps as those of Example 3 or Example 4.

[0071] The final products of three reactions were tested by 1H NMR respectively. It could be seen from the NMR hydrogen spectra that the conversion of polythiol compound B and double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A in the three reactions was almost 100%. The molar ratio of a thiol group in the polythiol compound B to a carbon-carbon double bond in the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A was 1:1. The target product photoinitiators could be prepared from the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A and the polythiol compound B by the thiol-ene click reaction. The conversion of the double-bond-containing α-aminoketone photoinitiator A and the polythiol compound B was almost 100%.

Performance Test

[0072] The following experiments were conducted separately to test performance of the target products obtained in the above Examples.

Experimental Example 1

[0073] The photoinitiators 1-5 prepared in the Examples and photoinitiator 907 were tested for light curing in monomers, respectively. According to the following mass ratio, the test solutions were prepared by mixing the photoinitiators 1-5 or the photoinitiator 907, respectively. [0074] Bifunctional monomer (TPGDA): 97%; [0075] Photoinitiator (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 907): 2%; [0076] Leveling agent: 0.5%; and [0077] Defoamer: 0.5%.

[0078] The test solutions were respectively coated on the cardboard to form a coating of about 30˜35 μm. The LED light source (LED surface light source with width of 3 cm and length of 80 cm) with a unit power of 2000 mW/cm.sup.2 and an emission wavelength of 365 nm, produced by Guangzhou He Guang Tong Sheng Company, was used as the excitation light source and placed on a variable speed conveyor belt. Repeated scratching with nails without imprinting was the standard for the completion of photopolymerization curing.

[0079] The test results showed that the curing speed of the photoinitiator 1, photoinitiator 2, photoinitiator 3, photoinitiator 4, photoinitiator 5 and photoinitiator 907 in the monomer did not show any difference.

Experimental Example 2

[0080] The photoinitiator 1 was used for light curing test in the coating formulations.

[0081] According to the following mass percentages, the curing solutions were prepared by the photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907, respectively. [0082] Epoxy acrylate (621A-80): 15%; [0083] Aromatic urethane acrylate (6146-100): 24%; [0084] Aliphatic polyurethane acrylate (6145-100): 20%; [0085] Trifunctional monomer (TMPTA): 23%; [0086] Difunctional monomer (HDDA): 3%; [0087] Bifunctional monomer (TPGDA): 12%; [0088] Photoinitiator (1 or 907): 2.5%; and [0089] Leveling agent: 0.5%.

[0090] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 curing solution were coated on the substrate to form a coating with thickness of about 20˜25 μm. The RW-UVA201-20 mercury lamp curing machine produced by Shenzhen Runwo Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. was used as the excitation light source with light intensity of 220 mW/cm.sup.2, placed on a conveyor belt (speed of about 8 m/min), and cured 3 times, to test the pencil hardness, adhesive force, flexibility, and glossiness of the cured coating. In addition, 18.00 g of the curing solution was placed in a centrifuge tube and placed in a 60° C. oven for 7 days, to obtain the change in viscosity of the system before and after thermal storage. The results were shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Test results of coating properties Photoinitiator Photoinitiator Performance 907 system 1 system Pencil hardness 3H 3H Adhesive force (ABS board) Grade 1 Grade 1 Flexibility (mm) >7.5 >7.5 Yellowing (Δb) 1.98 (after cured 1.02 (after cured 4 times) 4 times) 6.77 (after cured 3.71 (after cured 40 times) 40 times) Glossiness (GU) 94.6 ± 0.14 92.3 ± 0.12 Change in viscosity No significant No significant change change

[0091] The test results showed that photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 showed no difference in curing speed in the coating formulation, but the anti-yellowing performance of the photoinitiator 1 was significantly better than that of the photoinitiator 907.

Experimental Example 3

[0092] The photoinitiators 1-5 were used for migration test of light-curing product, respectively.

[0093] 1% photoinitiators 1-5 or photoinitiator 907 trimethylolpropane triacrylate solutions were prepared, respectively. The photoinitiators 1-5 or photoinitiator 907 trimethylolpropane triacrylate solutions were respectively coated on a slide, to form a film with thickness of 30˜35 μm. The RW-UVA201-20 mercury lamp curing machine produced by Shenzhen Runwo Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. was used as the excitation light source with light intensity of 220 mW/cm.sup.2, placed on the conveyor belt (speed of about 30 m/s), and cured 5 times. The cured films were peeled and cut. 100 mg film fragments were soaked in 20 mL acetonitrile for 24 h, and the supernatant was tested 3 times for the UV-visible absorption spectrum. The absorbance of the maximum absorption peaks of the photoinitiators 1-5 and photoinitiator 907 at 307 nm was recorded.

[0094] The relative migration rate of the photoinitiators 1-5 and 907 could be calculated from the following formula.

c=A/(ε.Math.b); and

R=c(I)/c(907)*100.

[0095] In the above formulas, c is concentration of the photoinitiator in the extract solution in mol/L; A is the absorbance; c is molar absorbance coefficient of the photoinitiator at 307 nm in L/(mol.Math.cm); b is thickness of the sample cell in cm; c(I) is concentration of the photoinitiator I in the extract solution (the photoinitiator I is one of photoinitiators 1-5); c(907) is concentration of photoinitiator 907 in the extract solution; R is a relative mobility of the photoinitiator I in contrast to the photoinitiator 907. The absorbance of the solution containing photoinitiator 907 was defined as 100, and the relative migration rate R of the photopolymerization system initiated by other molecules were shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 Mobility test results Photoinitiator Photoinitiator Photoinitiator Photoinitiator Photoinitiator Photoinitiator Formulation 907 1 2 3 4 5 Migration 100 14 12 13 13 12 rate R

[0096] The test results showed that compared with the photoinitiator 907, the migration rate of the photoinitiators 1-5 decreased significantly, and it could be concluded that compared with the photoinitiator 907, the migration rate of the photoinitiator I decreased significantly.

Experimental Example 4

[0097] The photoinitiator 1 was used for migration test of light-curing products in the coating formulations.

[0098] Four curing solutions were prepared according to the following mass percentages. [0099] Polyester acrylate (6342): 20%; and [0100] Trifunctional monomer (TMPTA): 80%.

[0101] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 were added to each of the four curing solutions, respectively. The addition amount of the photoinitiator 1 or photoinitiator 907 was 3% or 6% of total mass of the curing solution, respectively.

[0102] The above different concentrations of the photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 solution were respectively coated on the PET film to form 20˜25 μm coating. The RW-UVA201-20 mercury lamp curing machine produced by Shenzhen Runwo Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. was used as the excitation light source with light intensity of 220 mW/cm.sup.2, placed on the conveyor belt (speed of about 8 m/min), and cured 3 times. The cured films were peeled and cut. 0.50 g film fragments were soaked in 10 mL ethanol at 40° C. for 10 days, and the supernatant was collected and tested by a UV spectrophotometer to analyze the migration rate of the photoinitiators. The average value of two test results was taken. The results were shown in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Mobility test results Photo- Photo- Photo- Photo- initiator initiator initiator initiator Initiator content 907-3% 907-6% I-3% I-6% Migration rate (mg/mL) 0.468 0.907 0.06 0.094

[0103] The test results showed that the migration rate of the photoinitiator 1 was less than ⅛ that of the photoinitiator 907, showing a significant decrease.

Experimental Example 5

[0104] The photoinitiator 1 was used for testing curing odor.

[0105] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 were prepared in solutions according to the following mass percentages. [0106] Trifunctional monomer (TMPTA): 64.9%; [0107] Difunctional monomer (HDDA): 30%; [0108] Leveling agent: 0.6%; [0109] Defoamer: 0.5%; and [0110] Photoinitiator (1 or 907): 4%

[0111] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 solution were coated on the PET film to form a coating with thickness of about 40˜45 μm and coating area of about 8×20 cm. The RW-UVA201-20 mercury lamp curing machine produced by Shenzhen Runwo Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. was used as the excitation light source with light intensity of 220 mW/cm.sup.2, placed on the conveyor belt (speed of about 8 m/min), and cured once. In the curing process, three testers at the same time smelled whether there is a pungent odor. The odor was evaluated according to the following levels:

[0112] Level 0-no pungent odor; Level 1-slight pungent odor; Level 2-medium pungent odor; Level 3-medium-high pungent odor; and Level 4-high pungent odor.

[0113] Each formulation was tested twice, and the odor evaluation level which occurred most was taken as the final result. The test results were shown in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Curing odor test results Photoinitiator Odor level Photoinitiator 907 system Level 3 Photoinitiator 1 system Level 1

[0114] The test results showed that compared with the photoinitiator 907, the odor level of the photoinitiator I with the molecular weight of 1000 or more was significantly less.

Experimental Example 6

[0115] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 were tested for photo-curing performance in TMPTA.

[0116] The photoinitiability of the photoinitiator 1 was compared with that of the photoinitiator 907. FIGS. 3 and 4 showed the photopolymerization kinetic curves and Photo-DSC polymerization exotherm curves of TMPTA initiated by the photoinitiator 1 and the photoinitiator 907 in the same weight and in the same number of moles, respectively.

[0117] As shown in FIG. 4, when the photoinitiator 1 and the photoinitiator 907 were in the same number of moles, the exotherm rate of polymerization and the final conversion rate of the photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 were basically the same.

[0118] As shown in FIG. 3, when the photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 were in the same weight, the exotherm rate of the photoinitiator 1 reached highest after 8 s, and the maximum rate was 34.67 mW/mg, which was slightly lower than that of the photoinitiator 907. With the extension of the light time, the total exotherm of the double bond polymerization of the resin initiated by the photoinitiator 907 was higher, and the overall conversion rate was slightly higher. Referring to FIG. 4, it could be concluded that when the macromolecular photoinitiator 1 and the photoinitiator 907 with the same weight initiated TMPTA, the molar concentration of the photoinitiator 1 in the curing system was lower, resulting in lower exotherm and final conversion rate. This difference could be narrowed by adding the photoinitiator 1 with same number of moles. In combination with FIGS. 3 and 4, it could be learned that photoinitiator 1 had almost the same efficiency as that of the photoinitiator 907. The photoinitiator 1 was potential in industrialization.

Experimental Example 7

[0119] The photoinitiator 1 was tested for antioxidant-inhibition test in coating formulations.

[0120] Two curing solutions were prepared according to the following mass percentages. [0121] Polyester acrylate (6342): 60%; and [0122] Trifunctional monomer (TMPTA): 40%.

[0123] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 in the same number of moles were respectively added to each of the 2 curing solutions. The addition amount of the photoinitiator 907 was 3% of the total mass of the curing solution.

[0124] The curing solutions were respectively coated on a PET film to form a coating with thickness of 20˜25 μm, placed under 365 nm LED surface light source with light intensity of 700 mW/cm.sup.2 which was produced by YIWATA (Shanghai) Precision Optoelectronics Co., Ltd., placed on the conveyor belt (speed of 8 m/min), and cured 3 times. Then the cured sample was cut into 6×6 cm square, baked at 40° C. for 15 min, weighed, wiped with skimmed cotton dipped in alcohol to remove the uncured part of the coating surface, dried in the oven at 40° C. for 30 min, weighed again, and recorded the difference between the two weighing results, to calculate the uncured thickness. The average value of 3 test results was taken. The results were shown in Table 4.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Antioxidant-inhibition test results Photoinitiator 907 I Uncured surface thickness (μm) 1.89 ± 0.26 1.71 ± 0.07

[0125] The test results showed that photoinitiator I had a better antioxidant-inhibition effect than photoinitiator 907. Compared the structural formulas of the photoinitiator I and photoinitiator 907, it was found that photoinitiator I could improve the antioxidant-inhibition effect of photoinitiators in the coating due to the introduction of thioether.

Experimental Example 8

[0126] The photoinitiator 1 was tested for refractive index in coating formulations.

[0127] Two curing solutions were prepared according to the following mass percentages. [0128] Polyester acrylate (6342): 60%; and [0129] Trifunctional monomer (TMPTA): 40%.

[0130] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 in the same number of moles were respectively added into the curing solution. The addition amount of photoinitiator 907 added was 3% of the total mass of the curing solution.

[0131] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 curing solutions were respectively tested for refractive index by an Abbe refractometer. The average value of two test results was taken. The results were shown in Table 5.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5 Refractive index test results Photoinitiator 907 1 Refractive index n.sub.D (13° C.) 1.4930 1.4946

[0132] The test results showed that the refractive index of the curing system containing the photoinitiator 1 was better than that of the curing system containing the photoinitiator 907.

Experimental Example 9

[0133] The photoinitiator 1 and photoinitiator 907 were tested for DSC thermal stability.

[0134] In order to compare the thermal stability of the photoinitiator 907 and the photoinitiator 1, the difference in thermal stability of the two photoinitiators was tested under nitrogen protection at a temperature rate of 10° C./min, with a nitrogen flow rate of 50 mL/min. As shown in FIG. 5, compared with the photoinitiator 907, the thermal stability of the photoinitiator 1 had significantly improved, there was no significant thermal effect within 300° C.

[0135] The experimental analysis was conducted as follows.

[0136] From Experimental Example 1, Experimental Example 2, Experimental Example 6, Experimental Example 8, and Experimental Example 9, it could be obtained that there was no significant difference between the curing speed of the photoinitiator I and that of the photoinitiator 907. The anti-yellowing property of the photoinitiator I was significantly better than that of the photoinitiator 907. When the photoinitiator I and the photoinitiator 907 in the same number of moles were cured in the initiating curing system, the polymerization exothermic rate and the final conversion rate of the photoinitiator I and the photoinitiator 907 were basically the same. The photoinitiator I had better heat stability than the photoinitiator 907. The refractive index of the curing system containing photoinitiator I was relatively better than that of the curing system containing photoinitiator 907.

[0137] From Experimental Example 3, Experimental Example 4, and Experimental Example 5, it could be obtained that the molecular weight of the photoinitiator I was larger than that of the photoinitiator 907. The migration rate of photoinitiator I was significantly lower than that of the photoinitiator 907 in the cured products using the monomer formulation or the coating formulation. When curing, compared with the photoinitiator 907, the photoinitiator I had less irritating odor. Furthermore, the photoinitiator I was suitable for the application areas with high biological toxicity requirements.

[0138] As shown in Experimental Example 7, the photoinitiator I had a better antioxidant-inhibition effect than photoinitiator 907 in the coating. The photoinitiator I had a faster surface drying speed of the cured product when triggering the curing system to cure.

[0139] In summary, the photoinitiator I had better performance than the photoinitiator 907, so that the photoinitiator I could replace the photoinitiator 907, and had a wider application range than the photoinitiator 907.