URATE OXIDASE PREPARATION AND USE THEREOF

Abstract

Provided is a urate oxidase preparation. The urate oxidase preparation includes polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase as an active ingredient and a buffer reagent as an excipient.

Claims

1. A urate oxidase preparation, comprising: an active ingredient selected from a polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase; and an excipient selected from a buffer reagent, wherein the buffer reagent comprises at least one of phosphate or hydrochloride.

2. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein at least 11 of the following amino acid sites in the urate oxidase have a PEG modification: T.sup.1, K.sup.3, K.sup.4, K.sup.30, K.sup.35, K.sup.76, K.sup.79, K.sup.97, K.sup.112, K.sup.116K.sup.120, K.sup.152, K.sup.179, K.sup.222, K.sup.231, K.sup.266, K.sup.272, K.sup.285, K.sup.291, and K.sup.293, and the amino acid sites are positioned based on an amino acid sequence set forth as SEQ ID NO: 1.

3. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 2, wherein at least one, at least two, at least three, or four of the following four amino acid sites in the urate oxidase have a PEG modification: K.sup.3, K.sup.35, K.sup.222 and K.sup.231.

4. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a monomethoxy group or a hydroxyl group.

5. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the polyethylene glycol is of a linear or branched structure.

6. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the polyethylene glycol is coupled to the urate oxidase via an amide bond.

7. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the polyethylene glycol is a modified polyethylene glycol, and a modification group of the modified polyethylene glycol is at least one selected from the group consisting of N-hydroxysuccinimide, N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbonate, N-hydroxysuccinimidyl acetate, N-hydroxysuccinimidyl propionate, N-hydroxysuccinimidyl butyrate, N-hydroxysuccinimidyl succinate, and bis(p-nitrophenyl) carbonate, preferably N-hydroxysuccinimidyl propionate.

8. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the urate oxidase has an amino acid sequence set forth as any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 7; or the urate oxidase is a polypeptide having at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% identity with any of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 7; or the urate oxidase is a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence set forth as any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 7 in which one or more amino acids are substituted, deleted and/or added.

9. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the urate oxidase has an amino acid sequence set forth as any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 4.

10. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the buffer reagent comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and sodium chloride.

11. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the urate oxidase preparation has a pH of 7 to 9, preferably a pH of 7.4 to 8.2.

12. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 8, wherein a mass ratio of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase to the buffer reagent is (5 to 6): (6 to 37), preferably 6:10.

13. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 8, wherein the buffer reagent comprises phosphate, and a mass ratio of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase to the phosphate is (5 to 6): (1 to 7), wherein the phosphate is disodium hydrogen phosphate and sodium dihydrogen phosphate.

14. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 8, wherein the buffer reagent comprises sodium chloride, and a mass ratio of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase to the sodium chloride is (5 to 6): (5 to 30).

15. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 8, wherein the buffer reagent comprises phosphate and sodium chloride, and a mass ratio of the phosphate to the sodium chloride is (1 to 7): (5 to 30), wherein the phosphate is disodium hydrogen phosphate and/or sodium dihydrogen phosphate.

16. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein a dosage form of the urate oxidase preparation comprises at least one of liquid, semi-solid, or solid.

17. The urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1, wherein the preparation is in a single-dose form, each dose of the preparation containing 6 mg of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase.

18. A pharmaceutical composition, comprising the urate oxidase preparation according to claim 1.

19. The pharmaceutical composition according to claim 18, further comprising an additional drug for the treatment or prevention of hyperuricemia and hyperuricemia-related diseases.

20. A method for treating or preventing hyperuricemia and hyperuricemia-related diseases, comprising: administering to a subject a pharmaceutically acceptable amount of the urate oxidase preparation comprising: an active ingredient selected from a polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase; and an excipient selected from a buffer reagent, wherein the buffer reagent comprises at least one of phosphate or hydrochloride.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0055] The foregoing and/or additional aspects and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent and readily appreciated from the following description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:

[0056] FIG. 1 is a spectrum of SEC-HPLC-UV detection of a PHC physical and chemical reference substance according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0057] FIG. 2 is a spectrum of SEC-HPLC-RI detection of a PHC physical and chemical reference substance according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0058] FIG. 3 is a spectrum of SEC-HPLC-RI detection of a PEG reference substance according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0059] FIG. 4 is a spectrum of SEC-HPLC-UV detection of a PU5 modification product according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0060] FIG. 5 is a spectrum of SEC-HPLC-RI detection of a PU5 modification product according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0061] FIG. 6 is a comparison diagram of PHC and PU5 using Lys-c and trypsin double digestion according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0062] FIG. 7 is a diagram of Lys-C digestion of PU5 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0063] FIG. 8 is an SEC (size exclusion chromatography) plot of Formulation 5 at day 0 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0064] FIG. 9 is an SEC plot of Formulation 5 at 37° C. on day 30 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0065] FIG. 10 is an SEC plot of Formulation 6 at 37° C. on day 30 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0066] FIG. 11 is an SEC plot of Formulation 7 at 37° C. on day 30 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

[0067] FIG. 12 is a graph showing serum uric acid levels after intramuscular administration of different doses to model rats according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0068] FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating scores of kidney injury, necrosis, and inflammation according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0069] FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating mean serum drug concentration-time curve of various groups after a single intravenous injection of the same dose (1.0 mg/kg) of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection in SD rats according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0070] FIG. 15 illustrates mean serum drug concentration-time curves of various groups after a single intramuscular injection of Pegloticase and pegylated uricase injections of different doses in SD rats according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0071] FIG. 16 illustrates mean serum drug concentration-time curves of various groups after a single intramuscular injection of pegylated uricase injections of different doses in SD rats according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0072] FIG. 17 illustrates mean serum uric acid value-time curves of various groups after a single intramuscular/intravenous injection of Pegloticase and pegylated uricase injections of different doses in SD rats according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0073] FIG. 18 illustrates mean serum drug concentration-time curves of male and female SD rats after the first intravenous injection (Day 1) of the same dose (1.0 mg/kg) of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0074] FIG. 19 illustrates mean serum drug concentration-time curves of male and female SD rats after the last intravenous injection (Day 22) of the same dose (1.0 mg/kg) of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0075] FIG. 20 illustrates mean serum drug concentration-time curves of male and female SD rats after the first intramuscular injection (Day 1) of the same dose (1.0 mg/kg) of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0076] FIG. 21 illustrates mean serum drug concentration-time curves of male and female SD rats after the last intramuscular injection (Day 22) of the same dose (1.0 mg/kg) of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0077] FIG. 22 illustrates mean serum uric acid value-time curves after multiple intravenous injections of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection in SD rats according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; and

[0078] FIG. 23 illustrates mean serum uric acid value-time curves after multiple intramuscular injections of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection in SD rats according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0079] The embodiments of the present disclosure are described in detail below, and examples of the embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, throughout which same or similar reference numerals represent same or similar components or components with same or similar functions. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are illustrative and are intended to explain the present disclosure, but should not be understood as a limitation of the present disclosure.

[0080] An object of the present disclosure is to provide a novel polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase preparation.

[0081] Another object of the present disclosure is to provide the use of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase preparation described above, which can achieve a long-lasting efficacy in vivo and a significant reduction in the serum uric acid level, and can be used for the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout.

[0082] In one aspect of the present disclosure, provided is a polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase preparation.

[0083] Urate oxidase is not particularly limited, and can be urate oxidase and urate oxidase analogues derived from any source. Representative examples include, but are not limited to, mammalian sources, microorganisms, plants, etc.

[0084] The urate oxidase derived from different species according to the present disclosure can be obtained through various manners, including but not limited to natural extraction, chemical synthesis, genetic engineering recombinant expression, etc.

[0085] In another preferred embodiment, the urate oxidase is prepared and obtained in a manner that E. coli or yeast is used as a host to construct a recombinant expression strain, and E. coli is more preferably used as host bacteria for recombinant expression.

[0086] In another preferred embodiment, the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase is used as an active ingredient, and sodium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium hydrogen phosphate, and sodium chloride are added to prepare a preparation with maximized enzyme activity and improved storage stability.

[0087] In another preferred embodiment, the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase preparation has high storage stability without adding other stabilizers, such as mannitol, glycerol, and Tween-80, and thus the urate oxidase preparation has a simple formulation, simple preparation process, and low cost.

[0088] In one aspect of the present disclosure, provided is the use of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase preparation as described above.

[0089] The polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase preparation is more suitable as a drug and composition thereof for treating chronic hyperuricemia or gout. The main symptoms of hyperuricemia and gout include, but are not limited to, uric acid nephropathy and gouty arthritis.

[0090] The administration route of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase includes, but is not limited to, intravenous injection, subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intraperitoneal injection, etc., preferably intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, more preferably intramuscular injection.

[0091] The polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase has lower immunogenicity in vivo.

[0092] The polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase having low immunogenicity means that after intramuscular injection of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase in the human or animal body, the body does not produce antibodies against polyethylene glycol molecules or produces low titer antibodies against polyethylene glycol molecules, and does not produce antibodies against urate oxidase either.

[0093] The polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase has a longer half-life in vivo and the efficacy in reducing the uric acid level in the blood after intramuscular injection.

[0094] Furthermore, the terms “first” and “second” are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as “first” or “second” may explicitly or implicitly include at least one such feature. In the description of the present disclosure, “plurality” means at least two, e.g., two, three, etc., unless specifically limited otherwise.

[0095] The present disclosure will now be described with reference to specific examples. It should be noted that these examples are intended to be illustrative only and not limiting in any way.

Example 1 Preparation of Recombinant Urate Oxidase

1.1 Construction of Genes and Expression Plasmids for Uricase Expression

[0096] According to the usage preference data of E. coli codon, in combination with factors such as codon preference and GC content, cDNA sequence of the uricase protein (referred to as PHC) (SEQ ID NO:1) was designed, and the whole gene was synthesized and named as pUC-57-PHC plasmid. Nde I and BamH I were used as the target gene insertion sites, and the pET-30a plasmid was used as the expression vector (pET-30a-PHC).

1.2 Transformation of Expression Plasmids into Bacterial Host Cells

[0097] The expression vector pET-30a-PHC was introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) by CaCl2 method, high expression clones were screened through resistance screening with Kanamycin, and the original seed bank strain (E3B) was preserved. These steps were performed in accordance with the commonly used methods in the field of molecular biology.

1.3 Preparation of Recombinant Urate Oxidase

[0098] The transformed and engineered strains were fermented and expressed in a fermentor, under the control conditions: first culturing at 30° C. and pH 7.2 to an OD.sub.600=30 or higher, adding IPTG to 0.5 mmol/L, and continuing to induce for 3 hours or more to allow urate oxidase to accumulate. The cells were collected by centrifugation, and then preserved below −15° C.

[0099] The frozen bacteria were taken and suspended in a buffer of 25 mmol/L Tris and 5 mmol/L EDTA, at a suspension ratio of 1:10 (W/V). After breaking the bacterial cells with high pressure, the urate oxidase precipitate was collected by centrifugation, the precipitate was washed once with 50 mmol/L NaHCO.sub.3, and the enriched uricase precipitate was suspended in a Na.sub.2HCO.sub.3 buffer (100 mmol/L, pH 9.7 to 10.3) at a suspension ratio of 1:50 (W/V), following by stirring overnight at room temperature to dissolve, and then centrifuging to collect the supernatant.

[0100] Urate oxidase was further purified through several chromatographic steps. The purity detected by SDS-PAGE was 95% or greater, and the purity detected by Superdex 200 column was greater than 95%, with no aggregate form. The protein concentration was determined by Lowry method, and the activity of the urate oxidase was measured by spectrophotometry, where 1 unit (U) of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to convert 1 μmol of uric acid per minute under the optimal reaction temperature of 37° C. and the optimal buffer condition at pH 9.0.

Example 2 Preparation of Pegylated Urate Oxidase

[0101] Monomethoxy PEG derivatives with different molecular weights (500 Da to 20,000 Da), such as N-succinimidyl propionate PEG (5K-PEG-SPA) with a molecular weight of 5 K, are dissolved with a 1 to 5 mmol/L acid solution to form a 100 to 300 mmol/L PEG solution, which, after the dissolving, was added to a carbonate buffer solution containing the urate oxidase dissolved therein and having a carbonate concentration of 0.1 to 0.3 mol/L, pH 10.0, according to molar ratio of 1:45 to 1:150 (urate oxidase: 5K-PEG-SPA), thereby allowing a coupling reaction between PEG and urate oxidase. A concentration of the urate oxidase in the coupling reaction was 10 mg/ml. The coupling reaction required stirring at 5 to 30° C. for 60 minutes or more, until the PEG coupling degree no longer changed with time. After the reaction was finished, the PEG not participating in the modification and by-products were removed from the reaction by ultrafiltration and/or chromatography. A suitable molecular sieve chromatography medium was used to separate and remove modified by-products. Finally, the 5K modified pegylated urate oxidase (referred to as PU5) was obtained through sterile filtration.

Example 3: Characteristic Analysis of Pegylated Urate Oxidase

3.1 Detection of Average Modification Degree and Enzyme Activity

[0102] The protein concentration was determined by using Lowry method, and the activity of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase was determined by using spectrophotometer. The maximum ultraviolet absorption wavelength of uric acid, i.e., the substrate of uricase, was 293 nm, and the maximum ultraviolet absorption wavelength of the product allantoin was 224 nm. Within a certain concentration range, the absorption value of uric acid at 293 nm was in direct proportion to its concentration. The quantitative determination of uric acid can be carried out by spectrophotometer. The specific process was as follows: the UV-Vis spectrophotometer was turned on, the wavelength was adjusted to 293 nm, and the water bath circulation system of the instrument was turned on to keep the temperature at 37° C. Sodium tetraborate buffer was used as a blank control, and zero point was calibrated; 2.95 ml of substrate reaction solution (0.1 mol/L sodium tetraborate, 100 μmol/L uric acid, pH 9.5, preheated to 37° C.) was added in a quartz cuvette, then 50 μl of the test sample was added and mixed quickly to measure the absorption value at 293 nm. The change of the absorbance at 293 nm was continuously measured; a degradation concentration of uric acid was calculated according to C=A/εL (where A is an absorbance of a specific concentration of uric acid at 293 nm, c is a molar extinction coefficient of uric acid, L is an optical path of the cuvette, and C is a molar concentration of uric acid). The enzyme activity was calculated. The enzyme activity was defined as that, at the optimum reaction temperature of 37° C. and the optimum reaction pH 9.5, the amount of enzyme required to convert 1 μmol of uric acid into allantoin per minute is defined as one activity unit (U).

[0103] SEC-HPLC connected in series with UV/RI (a combination of ultraviolet and refractive index detector) was used to detect the average modification degree of polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase. Based on the fact that protein has a maximum absorption peak at ultraviolet 280 nm, PEG has no absorption at this wavelength, and the absorption value of the protein and the absorption value of PEG within a certain range by the differential refractive index detector are proportional to the respective concentrations, the content of PEG portion and the content of protein portion in the pegylated urate oxidase can be obtained using an external standard method with PEG reference substance and PHC physical and chemical reference substance, and thus the number of PEG molecules on each urate oxidase monomer, i.e., the average modification degree, can be obtained by the following calculation method.

Average modification degree of PEG-modified urate oxidase=(relative molecular weight of urate oxidase subunit×amount of PEG in sample)/(relative molecular weight of PEG×amount of protein in sample).

[0104] The SEC-HPLC-UV/RI detection spectrums of PHC physical and chemical reference substance, PEG reference substance, and PU5 modified product are illustrated in FIG. 1 to FIG. 5.

[0105] Under different feed ratios in Example 2, the enzyme activity and average modification degree of the obtained polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase are shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1 Enzyme activity and average modification degree at different feed ratios at 5K-PEG Enzyme Average Protein:5K-PEG Enzyme activity modification feed molar ratio activity retention degree Unmodified urate oxidase  11.4 U/mg .sup. 100% 0 1:48 10.71 U/mg   94% 10.3 1:56 11.17 U/mg 103.4% 11.4 1:68  12.2 U/mg 107.1% 11.9 1:82 12.02 U/mg 105.4% 12.3 1:94 11.75 U/mg 103.1% 12.1  1:110 10.83 U/mg   95% 11.5  1:150 10.03 U/mg   88% 10.1 Notes: the average modification degree represents the number of PEG molecules bound per urate oxidase monomer.

[0106] It can be seen from Table 1 that the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase of the present disclosure, under a feed ratio of protein : 5K-PEG being in the range of 1:56 to 1:110, has an average modification degree of more than 11, and the enzyme activity was higher than that of unmodified urate oxidase, the retention rate of enzyme activity was high, the enzyme activity was not decreased, but increased, and the enzyme activity was relatively stable, which is completely different from the marketed drug Krystexx (pegloticase). According to the content disclosed in the patent of Savient (CN1264575C, FIG. 2A to FIG. 3B) and the common knowledge of those skilled in the art, the enzyme activity decreases significantly with the increasing modification degree of 5kD PEG. However, unexpectedly, with the average modification degree of more than 11, the polyethylene glycol-modified uricase obtained in the present disclosure does not have its enzyme activity changed significantly compared with the unmodified state. Therefore, the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase of the present disclosure has a higher average modification degree of polyethylene glycol compared with the marketed drug, and also achieves unexpected technical effects in terms of enzyme activity retention, which may be attributed to the differences in PEG modification degree or modification sites of polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase, according to Applicant's speculation.

3.2 Detection of Polyethylene Glycol Modification Sites

[0107] In the following procedure, the inventors performed modification site detection on the urate oxidase obtained in Example 2.

[0108] The PEG modification sites of polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase can be detected by performing enzyme digestion of the non-pegylated and pegylated urate oxidases with one or more enzymes and then performing chromatographic detection to obtain a chromatogram, i.e., peptide map for determination. The non-pegylated and pegylated urate oxidases can be digested through single-enzyme digestion (Lys-C or Trypsin) and/or double-enzyme digestion (Lys-C and Trypsin combined). The digested enzyme fragments were separated by reversed-phase column, and the modified sites of polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase were determined by the internal reference peptide fragment correction and comparison of the disappearance or reduction proportion of the peptide fragments.

[0109] Modification site analysis principle of trypsin and Lys-C double enzyme digestion quality peptide map: Lys-C can specifically digest the C-terminal of lysine (K); trypsin takes the basic amino acids, i.e., arginine (R) and lysine (K), as restriction enzyme cutting sites, and specifically digests the C-terminal peptide bond. Comparing the changes of the corresponding peptide fragments before and after digestion in PHC and PU5, and with reference to the internal standard peptide fragments, the relative proportion of the reduction or disappearance of the PEG-modified peptide fragments can be analyzed and determined. Through the relative proportion of the reduction or disappearance of the peptide fragment, it can be determined whether the lysine site on the peptide fragment is modified by PEG and the modified proportion. It should be pointed out that PEG modification is a non-uniform modification, and a high modification proportion of a site can be regarded as that this site is modified.

[0110] Details as follows: [0111] (1) Sample processing: urate oxidase and pegylated urate oxidase were taken and respectively diluted to 1 mg/ml with enzyme digestion buffer (25 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 20% acetonitrile, pH 9.0), and 100 μl of each dilute solution was taken, added with 2 μl of Lys-C, and digested at 37° C. for 4 hours. Subsequently, the solution was transferred to a pancreatin reaction tube (in a ratio of 1:100), digestion was continued at 37° C. for 2 hours, 4 μl of TCEP reducing solution was added, the reaction continued for 30 minutes, and then 10 μ, of 1 mol/L hydrochloric acid solution was added to terminate the reaction. [0112] (2) Analysis conditions:

[0113] Instrument: Thermo Ultimate 3000 HPLC and MSQ Plus;

[0114] Chromatographic column: Welch Materials μlltimate®XB-C18 (4.6 mm×250 mm, 5 μm), Welch;

[0115] Analysis conditions: A solution (aqueous solution containing 0.1% TFA), solution B (acetonitrile solution containing 0.1% TFA);

[0116] Gradient: 0 to 70 min, B from 3 to 70%;

[0117] LC detection wavelength: 214 nm;

[0118] Ion source: ESI;

[0119] Ion type: positive ion;

[0120] Cone voltage: 50V;

[0121] Scanning range: 300 to 2000 Da;

[0122] Scan time: 1 S;

[0123] Post-column flow splittered to MS: about 0.3 ml/min.

[0124] 100 μl of the sample was injected, and the chromatogram was recorded. [0125] (3) Results processing:

[0126] The chromatograms (peptide maps) of urate oxidase and pegylated urate oxidase were compared, and the relative proportion of area reduction of the differential peptide fragments. [0127] (4) The experimental results are shown in Table 2 to Table 5, and FIG. 6 to FIG. 7.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 2 List of peptide fragments of PHC after digestion with Lys-C Theoretical Measured Peptide Digestion molecular molecular fragment site Sequence weight (Da) weight T1   3 TYK  410.47  410.2 T2   4 K  146.189 / T3  17 NDEVEFVRTGYGK 1513.627 / T2 + T3 KNDEVEFVRTGYGK 1641.089 1642.2 T4  21 DMIK  505.63  505.4 T5  30 VLHIQRDGK 1065.241 1065 T6  35 YHSIK  646.744  646.5 T7  48 EVATTVQLTLSSK 1376.57 / T8  49 K  146.189 / T9  66 DYLHGDNSDVIPTDTI 1903.032 1903 K T10  74 NTVNVLAK  858.005  857.7 T11  76 FK  293.366  293.1 T12  79 GIK  316.401  316.2 T13  97 SIETFAVTICEHFLSSF 2059.364 2059 K T14 112 HVIRAQVYVEEVPW 1853.154 1852.8 K T15 116 RFEK  578.669  578.4 T16 120 NGVK  416.478  417.2 T17 152 HVHAFIYTPTGTHFC 3586.088 3586.2 EVEQIRNGPPVIHSGI K T18 155 DLK  374.437  374.1 T19 158 VLK  358.481  358.2 T20 169 TTQSGFEGFIK 1214.34 1213.8 T21 179 DQFTTLPEVK 1177.32 1176.8 T22 190 DRCFATQVYCK 1333.543 1333.2 T23 215 WRYHQGRDVDFEAT 3106.45 3106.5 WDTVRSIVLQK T24 222 FAGPYDK  796.878  796.5 T25 231 GEYSPSVQK  994.069  993.7 T26 266 TLYDIQVLTLGQVPEI 4046.66 4046.1 EDMEISLPNIHYLNID MSK T27 272 MGLINK  674.856 / T28 285 EEVLLPLDNPYGK 1486.685 1486.6 T27 + T28 MGLINK 2143.54 2143.2 EEVLLPLDNPYGK T29 291 ITGTVK  617.743  617.4 T30 293 RK  302.377 / T31 298 LSSRL  574.678  574.4

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 3 List of peptide fragments of PHC after double-enzyme digestion  with Lys-C and trypsin Theoretical relative Measured Peptide Sequence molecular molecular fragment position Sequence weight (Da) weight T1   1-3 TYK  410.470  410.3 T2   4 K  146.189 / T3  5-12 NDEVEFVR 1007.068 / T2 + 3  4-12 KNDEVEFVR 1135.4 T4  13-17 TGYGK  524.574  524.5 T5  18-21 DMIK  505.630  505.5 T6  22-27 VLHIQR  764.926  764.8 T7  28-30 DGK  318.330 / T8  31-35 YHSIK  646.744  646.7 T9  36-48 EVATTVQLTLSSK 1376.570 / T10  49 K  146.189 / T11  50-66 DYLHGDNSDVIPTDTIK 1903.032 1903.4 T12  67-74 NTVNVLAK  858.005  857.9 T13  75-76 FK  293.366  293.1 T14  77-79 GIK  316.401 / T15  80-97 SIETFAVTICEHFLSSFK 2059.364 2059.6 T16  98-101 HVIR  523.636  523.6 T17 102-112 AQVYVEEVPWK 1347.534 1347.4 T18 113 R  174.203 / T19 114-116 FEK  422.481 / T18 + 19 113-116 RFEK  578.684  578.6 T20 117-120 NGVK  416.478  417.1 T21 121-141 HVHAFIYTPTGTHFCEVEQ 2485.802 2486.8 IR T22 142-152 NGPPVIHSGIK 1118.301 1118.8 T21 + 22 121-152 3586.103 3587.7 T23 153-155 DLK  374.437 / T24 156-158 VLK  358.481  358.3 T25 159-169 TTQSGFEGFIK 1214.340 1214.2 T26 170-179 DQFTTLPEVK 1177.320 1177.2 T27 181-181 DR  289.291 / T28 182-190 CFATQVYCK 1062.267 / T27 + 28 181-190 1333.558 1333.6 T29 191-192 WR  360.416  360.1 T30 193-197 YHQGR  659.702  659.6 T31 198-209 DVDFEATWDTVR 1453.528 1453.6 T32 210-215 SIVLQK  686.850  686.8 T33 216-222 FAGPYDK  796.878  796.8 T34 223-231 GEYSPSVQK  994.069  994.1 T35 262-266 TLYDIQVLTLGQVPEIEDM 4046.660 4047 EISLPNIHYLNIDMSK T36 267-272 MGLINK  674.856  674.7 T37 273-285 EEVLLPLDNPYGK 1486.685 1486.7 T36 + 37 2143.541 2143.6 T38 286-291 ITGTVK  617.743  617.7 T39 292 R  174.203 / T40 293 K  146.189 / T41 294-297 LSSR  461.519  461.5 T42 298 L  131.175 /

[0128] The calculation method of the reduction percentage of peak area of PU5 peptide fragments is as follows:

[0129] The following formula can be used to calculate the corresponding peak areas of PU5 peptide fragments at the concentration of PU5 same as the concentration of PHC:

A.sub.1=A.sub.0×t

[0130] where A.sub.1 is a peak area of PU5 peptide fragments converted with two internal reference peptides, A.sub.0 is a measured peak area of peptide fragments of a PU5 peptide map, and t is an average value of a peak area ratio of T30 internal reference peptide fragment in the PHC peptide map to T30 internal reference peptide fragment in the PU5 peptide map and a peak area ratio of T31 internal reference peptide fragment in the PHC peptide map to T31 internal reference peptide fragment in the PU5 peptide map, that is, t is 0.588.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 4 Comparison of PHC and PU5 internal reference peptide fragments Peptide PHC peptide map PU5 peptide map Peak area ratio of No. Retention Peak Retention Peak PHC to PU5 fragment Sequence time area time area Value Mean T30 YHQGR  7.5 13.4  7.467 22.9 0.585 0.588 T31 DVDFEA 28.31 35.5 28.28 60.1 0.591 TWDTV R

[0131] With the peak area of peptide fragment converted with the internal reference and the peak area of PHC peptide map, the relative percentage of the reduction of the peak area of a certain peptide fragment in the PU5 peptide map can be calculated based on the following equation:

P(%)=(A.sub.2−A.sub.1)/A.sub.2×100%

[0132] where A.sub.2 is a peak area of a certain peptide fragment in the PHC peptide map, and A.sub.1 is a peak area of this peptide fragment in PU5 converted with internal reference.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 5 Summary results of peptide fragments with reduced peak area in the peptide map of PU5 digested with double enzymes Peptide Relative proportion of fragment Peptide reduced peak area of position fragment sequence peptide fragment   1-3 TYK 100.00%   4-12 KNDEVEFVR  94.07%  31-35 YHSIK 100.00%  75-76 FK  82.27%  80-97 SIETFAVTICEHFLSSFK 100.00% 102-112 AQVYVEEVPWK 100.00% 113-116 RFEK 100.00% 117-120 NGVK 100.00% 121-152 HVHAFIYTPTGTHFCEVEQIRN 100.00% GPPVIHSGIK 193-197 YHQGR Internal reference peptide fragment 198-209 DVDFEATWDTVR Internal reference peptide fragment 216-222 FAGPYDK  91.37% 223-231 GEYSPSVQK  86.40% 232-266 TLYDIQVLTLGQVPEIEDMEISL 100.00% PNIHYLNIDMSK 273-285 EEVLLPLDNPYGK 100.00%

[0133] Based on the analysis of the protein sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of the present example, the potential sites for urate oxidase modification include 31 sites, including T.sup.1, K.sup.3, K.sup.4, K.sup.17, K.sup.21, K.sup.30, K.sup.35, K.sup.48, K.sup.49, K.sup.66, K.sup.74, K.sup.76, K.sup.79, K.sup.97, K.sup.112, K.sup.116, K.sup.120, K.sup.152, K.sup.155, K.sup.158, K.sup.169, K.sup.179, K.sup.190, K.sup.215 K.sup.222, K.sup.231 K.sup.266, K.sup.272, K.sup.285, K.sup.291 and K.sup.293.

[0134] Based on the analysis of the modification sites of polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase obtained in Example 2, as shown in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and FIG. 6, the sites with 90% or more disappearance of the peptide fragments after PU5 digestion include K.sup.3, K.sup.4, K.sup.35, K.sup.97, K.sup.112, K.sup.116, K.sup.120, K.sup.152, K.sup.222, K.sup.266, and K.sup.285, the sites with 80% to 90% disappearance of the peptide fragments after PU5 digestion include K.sup.76 and K.sup.231. In PU5, these sites are all modified.

[0135] Moreover, the inventors found that the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase of the present disclosure has more modification sites than the marketed drug, and has significant differences. For example, through single enzyme digestion, it was found that, the disappearance ratio of the peptide fragments where the four sites K.sup.30, K.sup.35, K.sup.222, and K.sup.231 are located in the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase of the present disclosure is more than 80%. However, by analyzing the marketed analogous drug Krystexx (pegloticase) with the method, the peptide fragments where these four sites are located hardly disappeared, that is, the modification rate of the marketed analogous drug at the four sites K.sup.30, K.sup.35, K.sup.222, and K.sup.231 is much lower than that of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase of the present disclosure. In addition, the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase of the present disclosure has significantly lower immunogenicity than the marketed drug, which may be related to the differences in the number of modification sites and the modification sites according to Applicant's speculation. Due to the differences in the modification sites and modification degree, the protection to the immunogenic site of the enzyme and the exposure of the active center of the enzyme in the body are both different. The above-mentioned differences may cause the difference in the biological properties of different modified enzymes in the body.

[0136] Since urate oxidase is a protein preparation and different chemical modifications will have different effects on its stability, it is necessary to use different excipients, pH, and the like for specific urate oxidase active ingredient to prepare the urate oxidase preparation when preparing the preparation. The following description will describe the preparation of a highly stable and biologically active urate oxidase preparation with the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase of the present disclosure.

Example 5: Formulation Screening

[0137] With the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase PU5 mentioned in the above examples as an active ingredient, the components of the polyethylene glycol-modified uricase preparation were screened to obtain a polyethylene glycol uricase preparation with high uricase activity and high stability. The screening includes: excipient formulation screening and stabilizer screening. [0138] 1. Excipient Screening

[0139] Excipients for preparation formulation include: carbonate, phosphate, hydrochloride, and citrate.

[0140] Using the above buffer excipients and the active ingredient to prepare the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase preparation. Under the conditions of the same concentration range of 10 to 50 mmol/L and the same pH (pH 7 to 9) of excipients, the stability of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase was basically the same, but the concentration ratio of different excipients and the difficulty degree of osmotic pressure control in the preparation process was different, in which control of osmotic pressure and pH was easier for phosphate and hydrochloride than for carbonate and citrate. Through buffer screening, it was found that when phosphate and hydrochloride were used as excipients, the concentration range of phosphate was 10 to 50 mmol/L, and the concentration range of hydrochloride was 100 to 200 mmol/L, which could meet the technological requirements of preparation. Among them, a preparation with 15 mmol/L sodium dihydrogen phosphate/disodium hydrogen phosphate, 0.136 mol/L sodium chloride, and pH 7.4 had relatively good stability, and was used as a basic formulation for further screening. [0141] 2. Stabilizer Screening Experiment

[0142] Mannitol, glycerol, and Tween-80 were added in the basic preparation formulation. Whether it was necessary to add corresponding stabilizers in this preparation formulation was determined through a stability study. [0143] 2.1 Primary Screening Experiment of Stabilizer

[0144] The basic formulation was used as a control. Stabilizers such as 4% mannitol, 2% glycerol, and 0.04% Tween-80 were added respectively to the basic formulation. The sample numbers were recorded as sample 1 to sample 4, respectively. Samples 1 to 4 were placed at 45° C. for 7 days, and the particle size was measured to study the effect of stabilizers on the stability of PU5 preparation.

[0145] It can be seen from the experimental results that the particle size of the formulations added with glycerol and mannitol (19.44 and 20.51, respectively) was larger than that of the basic preparation formulation (18.57), and the particle size of the preparation formulation added with Tween-80 (18.10) was slightly smaller than that of the basic preparation formulation. It was considered that the addition of Tween-80 in the preparation formulation can prevent the increase of the particle size of PU5. [0146] 2.2 Stabilizer Re-Screening Experiment

[0147] It can be seen from the preliminary screening experiment of the stabilizer that adding Tween-80 into the preparation formulation can prevent the increase of particle size of PU5, which is further confirmed by the stability. Two samples, sample 1 and sample 4, which were preliminarily selected and investigated at 45° C. for 7 days, were placed into the investigation box at 45° C. for additional 15 days. Samples were taken to detect the particle size, and the effect of Tween-80 stabilizer on the stability of PU5 preparation was studied. [0148] (1) See Table 6 for results of particle size detection

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 6 Summary of particle size results in stabilizer re-screening Average Peak PDI Percentage (%) particle particle (polydis- of particle Sample Treatment size size persity size >20 Name mode (nm) (nm) index) nm No. 1 Control 18.46 20.51 0.108 4.0 45° C. for 18.57 20.81 0.123 3.2 7 days 45° C. for 18.14 20.59 0.111 2.4 22 days No. 4 Control 17.51 18.98 0.073 3.7 45° C. for 18.10 19.91 0.089 3.7 7 days 45° C. for 18.47 20.87 0.119 2.9 22 days Notes: control means being placed at a condition of 2 to 8° C. [0149] (2) Conclusion

[0150] Data analysis from the investigation at 45° C. for 7 days and 22 days vs the control group: when 0.04% Tween-80 was added, the PDI of the sample was significantly smaller and the sample was more uniform within 7 days at 45° C.; when the detection was conducted on day 22 at 45° C., adding Tween-80 or not had no effect on the PDI, indicating that adding Tween-80 at high temperature had no significance in preventing or delaying the increase of particle size of PU5.

2.3 Third Stabilizer Screening Experiment

[0151] In order to finally determine whether to add Tween-80 in the preparation formulation, two formulations, i.e., a formulation with Tween-80 and a formulation without Tween-80, were placed at 25° C. for 1 month and 37° C. for 1 month for investigation, respectively. Samples were taken to determine the particle size, high and low molecular weight protein contents, pH, and specific enzyme activity. The results are shown in Table 7.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 7 Results of accelerated stability study High Low Av- molecular molecular Specific erage weight weight enzyme particle Content protein protein activity size Investigation index (mg/ml) content content (U/mg) (nm) Without Before 6.15 0.31% none 10.45 / adding Investigation detected Tween- 25° C. for 1 5.98 0.17% none 9.60 17.93 80 month detected 37° C. for 1 5.78 0.14% 9.20% 9.60 17.78 month Adding Before 6.46 0.37% none 9.07 / Tween- Investigation detected 80 25° C. for 1 6.04 0.18% none 8.95 17.62 month detected 37° C. for 1 6.00 0.20% 9.90% 8.75 17.32 month

[0152] It can be seen from Table 7 that the accelerated stability investigation of PU5 preparations with and without the addition of Tween-80 showed that the high and low molecular weight protein contents, enzyme activity, and particle size change behavior of PU5 preparations with and without the addition of Tween-80 were basically consistent.

[0153] After many times of investigations, there was no significant difference in the high and low molecular weight protein contents and particle size before and after adding Tween-80, so it was determined not to add the stabilizer in the preparation formulation.

Example 6: Preparation pH Screening

1. pH Range Optimization

[0154] (1) Research Method

[0155] The pH of the preparation formulation solution was adjusted to 7.8, 7.0, 7.4, 8.2, and 8.6 with buffer salts. The samples were placed at 2 to 8° C., 25±2° C., and 37° C. for stability study, and the contents of high molecular weight proteins and low molecular weight proteins and enzyme activity were determined on day 30. The polymerization or degradation of PU5 protein and the changes in enzyme activity were compared between the formulations. [0156] (2) Detection Results

[0157] The results are shown in Table 8 and FIGS. 8 to 11.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 8 Summary of determination results of contents of high molecular weight proteins and low molecular weight proteins and enzyme activity (%) Formu- Formu- Formu- Formu- Formu- lation 5 lation 6 lation 7 lation 8 lation 9 / 7.8 8.2 7.4 7.0 8.6 High Day 0 0.56% 0.82% 0.67% 0.33% 0.22% weight 2 to 0.19% 0.16% 0.19% 0.31% 0.26% molecule 8° C. for content 30 days 25 ± 2° C. 0.14% 0.12% 0.15% 0.21% 0.13% for 30 days 37° C. 0.04% 0.03% Not 0.17% 0.05% for 30 detected days Low Day 0 <1.0% <1.0% <1.0% 1.3% <1.0% weight 2 to <1.0% <1.0% <1.0% 2.3% 1.4% molecule 8° C. for content 30 days 25 ± 2° C. <1.0% <1.0% <1.0% 4.8% 1.7% for 30 days 37° C. 14.7% 10.5% 23.4% 27.1% 19.6% for 30 days Specific Day 0 9.77 10.10 9.98 9.76 8.13 enzyme 25 ± 2° C. 9.71 9.58 9.36 8.40 9.09 activity for (U/mg) 30 days 37° C. 8.95 9.95 8.20 8.11 8.50 for 30 days Notes: “long term” means 2 to 8° C., “accelerated” means 25 ± 2° C., and “high temperature” means 37° C.

[0158] It can be seen from FIGS. 8 to 11 and Table 8 that, after investigation at 2 to 8° C. and 25±2° C. for 30 days, the content of high molecular weight proteins in Formulation 5 (pH 7.8), Formulation 6 (pH 8.2), and Formulation 7 (pH 7.4) showed a decreasing trend; the content of low molecular weight proteins showed a slight increase trend, of which Formulation 7>Formulation 5>Formulation 6. There was no significant change in enzyme activity among the three formulations. It was thus determined that the pH of the PU5 preparation was controlled between 7.4 and 8.2. After 30 days of high-temperature investigation at 37° C., there was no significant difference in the content of high molecular weight proteins among Formulations 5, 6, and 7, but the content of low molecular weight proteins had an increase, of which Formulation 7>Formulation 5>Formulation 6. The pH midpoint of the PU5 preparation was thus determined to be 7.8.

[0159] In summary, it was determined that the pH of PU5 injection preparation was in a range of 7.4 to 8.2.

[0160] The polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase of the present disclosure is significantly less immunogenic than the marketed drug, which may be related to the difference in the number of modified sites and modified sites according to the inventors' speculation. Due to the differences in the modification sites and modification degree, the protection to the immunogenic site of the enzyme and the exposure of the active center of the enzyme in the body are both different. The above differences may cause the difference in the biological properties of different modified enzymes in the body.

[0161] The in vivo drug evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase preparation (PU5 preparation) of the present disclosure in animals will be described in detail below. The pegloticase used in the experiment refers to the analogous drug that has been marketed with a batch number 5085B.

Example 7 Study on In Vivo Pharmacodynamics of Polyethylene Glycol-Modified Urate Oxidase Preparation

7.1 In Vivo Efficacy Evaluation of Polyethylene Glycol-Modified Urate Oxidase in Model Rats

[0162] A chronic hyperuricemia rat model was induced by potassium oxazinate drinking water in combination with high uric acid feed, to evaluate the therapeutic effect of polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase (PU5) on chronic hyperuricemia in rats.

[0163] 40 model rats were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups, i.e., a model group, a low-dose pegylated uricase administration group (0.3 mg/kg), a medium-dose pegylated uricase administration group (1.0 mg/kg), and a high-dose pegylated uricase administration group (3.0 mg/kg), 10 rats in each group; and additionally, 10 normal SD rats were selected as the blank control group. The model-establishing experiment was conducted for 5 consecutive weeks, and intramuscular administration was started 1 week after the start of the model establishing. The administration was performed and continued once a week for 4 consecutive weeks. The levels of serum uric acid, serum urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine of rats before the administration and 7 days after each administration were detected, and the histological changes of rat kidneys were observed after the experiment.

[0164] The results in FIG. 12 indicate that on days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 after the start of the model establishing, compared with the blank control group, the serum uric acid level of the model control group increased significantly, and the serum urea nitrogen, creatinine and uric acid of the rats in the model group were 2.73 times, 2.40 times and 7.83 times these in the blank group, respectively. From the perspective of kidney pathology (as shown in FIG. 13), the scores of renal tubule dilatation, necrosis, inflammation, and fibrosis of the model control group increased significantly, and the quantity of urate crystals also increased significantly. Both the medium and high doses of the test substance, pegylated uricase, significantly reduced the serum uric acid level, which exhibited a dose-dependent relationship. During the period from day 14 to day 35, the average serum uric acid level of the medium-dose group was maintained at 303.80 to 660.60 μmol/L, and the average serum uric acid level of the high-dose group was maintained at 153.70 to 403.40 μmol/L. Compared with the model group, the serum uric acid in the medium-dose group was reduced by 34.46% to 67.94%; the serum uric acid in the high-dose group was reduced by 65.67% to 83.78%. Compared with the model control group, each pegylated uricase administration group had significant ameliorating effects on the renal tubule dilatation, renal necrosis and inflammation.

7.2 Evaluation of Single Administration Of Polyethylene Glycol-Modified Urate Oxidase in Rats

[0165] 36 SD rats (half females and half males) were randomly divided into 6 groups (see Table 9), namely, a marketed drug Pegloticase intravenous injection group, a Pegloticase intramuscular injection group, a polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase intravenous injection group, as well as low-dose, medium-dose and high-dose polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase intramuscular injection groups (0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 2.0 mg/kg). The specific administration regimens and doses are shown in Table 9. PK and PD were detected by taking the blood from the jugular vein.

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 6 Animal grouping and dose design Admini- Admini- Admini- Number Admini- Admini- stration stration stration of stration stration dose concentration volume animals Number Groups route frequency (mg/kg) (mg/ml) (ml/kg) Male Female 1 Pegloticase intravenous Intravenous One time 1.0 0.1 10.0 3 3 injection group injection 2 Pegloticase intramuscular Intramuscular One time 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 3 injection Group injection 3 PU5 preparation intravenous Intravenous One time 1.0 0.1 10.0 3 3 injection group injection 4 Low-dose intramuscular Intramuscular One time 0.5 0.5 1.0 3 3 injection group of PU5 injection preparation 5 Medium-dose intramuscular Intramuscular One time 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 3 injection group of PU5 injection preparation 6 High-dose intramuscular Intramuscular One time 2.0 2.0 1.0 3 3 injection group of PU5 injection preparation

7.2.1. Pharmacokinetic Comparison

[0166] All the SD rats, before the administration, each had a serum drug concentration level lower than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ: 312.500 ng/mL), and after one single intramuscular injection of 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, and 2.0 mg/kg of the drug , in a period from Oh to 168 h (0 to 7 days), the serum drug concentration of the pegylated uricase injection (PU5 preparation) was dose-dependent and had an overall level increasing with the increase in the administered dose; and 168 hours later, the blood drug concentration of the pegloticase intramuscular administration group was lower than the lower limit of quantification, and the blood drug concentration of the PU5 preparation intramuscular administration group maintained for more than 240 h.

[0167] After administration, for each group of 1.0 mg/kg Pegloticase intravenous injection and intramuscular injection groups, 1.0 mg/kg pegylated uricase intravenous injection group, as well as 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, and 2.0 mg/kg pegylated uricase intramuscular injection groups, a ratio of Cmax (C5 min) of female SD rats to male SD rats was in the range of 0.75 to 0.99, a ratio of AUClast of female SD rats to male SD rats was in the range of 0.54 to 0.94, and a ratio of AUCO-∞ of female SD rats to male SD rats was in the range of 0.58 to 0.97. It can be seen that there is no significant gender difference in the exposure levels of Pegloticase and the pegylated uricase (PU5 preparation) injections in SD rats.

[0168] However, when the SD rats were administered with the same dose (1.0 mg/kg), AUClast of the marketed drug Pegloticase intravenous administration group was 426.48±65.34, AUClast of the Pegloticase intramuscular injection group was 264.19 ±78.22; and AUClast of the PU5 preparation injection intravenous administration group was 565.61±161.60, the AUClast of the PU5 preparation intramuscular injection group was 337.86±227.34. Under the same dose and administration mode, the AUClast of PU5 preparation was higher than that of the marketed drug Pegloticase.

[0169] When the SD rats were administered with the same dose (1.0 mg/kg), t1/2 (h) of the marketed drug Pegloticase intravenous administration group was 49.51±8.12, t1/2 (h) of the Pegloticase intramuscular administration group was 55.21±13.50, t1/2 (h) of the PU5 preparation injection intravenous administration group was 86.12±33.82, and the t1/2 (h) of the PU5 preparation intramuscular administration group was 60.45±21.37. Under the same dose and administration mode, the t1/2 (h) of PU5 preparation injection was longer than that of the marketed drug Pegloticase.

[0170] The above pharmacokinetic results are shown in Tables 10 to 15, and FIG. 14 to FIG. 16.

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 10 Individual blood drug concentration data and statistical analysis data when the SD rats received a single intravenous injection of 1.0 mg/kg Pegloticase (unit: μg/mL) Sampling time Male Female Female + male (h) 1M001 1M002 1M003 N Mean SD 1F001 1F002 1F003 N Mean SD N Mean SD 0 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 0 / / 0.08333 8.03 7.466 8.078 3 7.858 0.340 6.495 6.402 7.828 3 6.908 0.798 6 7.383 0.756 0.5 8.042 7.352 7.926 3 7.773 0.369 6.257 6.141 7.618 3 6.672 0.821 6 7.223 0.830 2 5.917 7.235 6.914 3 6.689 0.687 6.056 5.875 6.836 3 6.256 0.511 6 6.472 0.591 4 7.598 7.047 6.757 3 7.134 0.427 5.595 4.922 7.164 3 5.894 1.150 6 6.514 1.031 8 7.144 5.852 6.492 3 6.496 0.646 5.005 4.121 5.748 3 4.958 0.815 6 5.727 1.069 24 4.992 3.923 4.469 3 4.461 0.535 3.764 3.341 4.862 3 3.989 0.785 6 4.225 0.654 48 3.552 2.934 3.304 3 3.263 0.311 2.988 2.415 3.836 3 3.080 0.715 6 3.172 0.503 72 3.009 2.271 2.422 3 2.567 0.390 2.223 1.994 3.103 3 2.440 0.585 6 2.504 0.450 120 1.522 1.483 1.246 3 1.417 0.149 0.985 1.098 1.734 3 1.272 0.404 6 1.345 0.284 168 0.652 0.629 0.316 3 0.532 0.188 0.497 0.672 0.726 3 0.632 0.120 6 0.582 0.151 240 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 0 / / 336 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 0 / / Notes: “/” means no relevant information.

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 11 Individual blood drug concentration data and statistical analysis data when the SD rats received a single intravenous injection of 1.0 mg/kg pegylated uricase (unit: μg/mL) Sampling time Male Female Female + male (h) 3M001 3M002 3M003 N Mean SD 3F001 3F002 3F003 N Mean SD N Mean SD 0 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 0 / / 0.08333 7.364 9.941 7.74 3 8.348 1.392 7.236 5.991 6.657 3 6.628 0.623 6 7.488 1.348 0.5 7.316 9.469 7.693 3 8.159 1.150 7.051 5.513 6.36 3 6.308 0.770 6 7.234 1.340 2 7.742 9.084 7.338 3 8.055 0.914 6.063 5.522 6.44 3 6.008 0.461 6 7.032 1.294 4 7 8.837 6.997 3 7.611 1.061 6.508 5.735 6.288 3 6.177 0.398 6 6.894 1.064 8 6.628 7.43 6.61 3 6.889 0.468 5.387 4.85 5.52 3 5.252 0.355 6 6.071 0.971 24 4.672 5.628 4.746 3 5.015 0.532 4.291 3.919 4.129 3 4.113 0.187 6 4.564 0.609 48 3.307 4.264 3.497 3 3.689 0.507 3.406 3.042 3.014 3 3.154 0.219 6 3.422 0.456 72 2.933 3.762 3.124 3 3.273 0.434 2.859 2.596 2.319 3 2.591 0.270 6 2.932 0.494 120 1.986 2.279 1.989 3 2.085 0.168 1.604 1.617 1.454 3 1.558 0.091 6 1.822 0.313 168 1.268 1.742 1.391 3 1.467 0.246 1.187 1.031 0.699 3 0.972 0.249 6 1.220 0.350 240 0.67 1.19 0.734 3 0.865 0.284 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 3 0.865 0.284 336 BLQ 0.853 0.368 2 0.611 0.343 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 2 0.611 0.343 Notes: “/” means no relevant information.

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 12 Individual blood drug concentration data and statistical analysis data when the SD rats received a single intramuscular injection of 1.0 mg/kg Pegloticase (unit: μg/mL) Sam- pling time Male Female Female + male (h) 2M001 2M002 2M003 N Mean SD 2F001 2F002 2F003 N Mean SD N Mean SD 0 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 0 / / 0.5 0.652 BLQ 0.581 2 0.617 0.050 0.388 BLQ BLQ 1 0.388 / 3 0.540 0.137 2 1.337 1.249 1.62 3 1.402 0.194 1.172 1.135 BLQ 2 1.154 0.026 5 1.303 0.194 4 2.298 1.699 2.348 3 2.115 0.361 1.812 1.371 0.773 3 1.319 0.521 6 1.717 0.593 8 2.56 2.058 2.396 3 2.338 0.256 1.915 1.657 1.273 3 1.615 0.323 6 1.977 0.474 24 3.808 3.235 3.309 3 3.451 0.312 2.947 2.808 2.493 3 2.749 0.233 6 3.100 0.456 48 3.188 2.618 2.749 3 2.852 0.299 2.317 2.279 1.729 3 2.108 0.329 6 2.480 0.495 72 2.694 2.263 2.211 3 2.389 0.265 1.984 2.016 1.261 3 1.754 0.427 6 2.072 0.471 120 1.56 1.169 1.332 3 1.354 0.196 0.884 1.111 0.174 3 0.723 0.489 6 1.038 0.480 168 BLQ 0.341 0.869 2 0.605 0.373 BLQ 0.635 BLQ 1 0.635 / 3 0.615 0.265 240 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 0 / / 336 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 0 / / Notes: “/” means no relevant information.

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 13 Individual blood drug concentration data and statistical analysis data when the SD rats received a single intramuscular injection of 1.0 mg/kg pegylated uricase injection (unit: μg/mL) Sampling time Male Female Female + male (h) 5M001 5M002 5M003 N Mean SD 5F001 5F002 5F003 N Mean SD N Mean SD 0 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 0 / / 0.5 BLQ 1.421 0.328 2 0.875 0.773 BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 2 0.875 0.773 2 BLQ 2.295 0.923 2 1.609 0.970 0.593 0.905 0.674 3 0.724 0.162 5 1.078 0.695 4 0.729 2.897 1.648 3 1.758 1.088 1.356 1.222 0.762 3 1.113 0.312 6 1.436 0.798 8 1.305 3.628 2.054 3 2.329 1.186 1.559 1.249 1.266 3 1.358 0.174 6 1.844 0.926 24 2.408 4.617 3.069 3 3.365 1.134 3.01 2.339 2.216 3 2.522 0.427 6 2.943 0.895 48 2.068 3.877 2.4 3 2.782 0.963 2.739 2.298 2.189 3 2.409 0.291 6 2.595 0.668 72 1.76 3.606 2.027 3 2.464 0.998 2.385 1.761 1.863 3 2.003 0.335 6 2.234 0.712 120 1.042 2.9 1.107 3 1.683 1.054 1.169 0.811 0.926 3 0.969 0.183 6 1.326 0.782 168 0.479 2.419 0.631 3 1.176 1.079 0.595 BLQ BLQ 1 0.595 / 4 1.031 0.928 240 BLQ 1.303 BLQ 1 1.303 / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 1 1.303 / 336 BLQ 0.719 BLQ 1 0.719 / BLQ BLQ BLQ 0 / / 1 0.719 / Notes: “/” means no relevant information.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 14 Average pharmacokinetic parameters of SD rats after a single intravenous injection of Pegloticase and pegylated uricase injections AUC.sub.last AUC.sub.0-∞ Vz Cl Dose Para- t.sub.1/2 C.sub.5 min (h*μg/ (h*μg/ (mL/ (mL/ MRT.sub.last (mg/kg) Gender meter (h) (μg/mL) mL) mL) kg) h/kg (h) 1.0 Male N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 (Peglo- Mean 45.70 7.86 448.57 484.58 136.90 2.08 52.36 ticase) SD 7.57 0.34 42.16 46.96 26.57 0.19 2.58 Female N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mean 53.32 6.91 404.38 453.63 173.91 2.26 54.64 SD 7.98 0.80 86.21 90.21 43.64 0.40 2.62 Female + N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 male Mean 49.51 7.39 426.48 469.11 155.40 2.17 53.50 SD 8.12 0.76 65.34 66.52 38.14 0.30 2.64 1.0 Male N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 (PU5 Mean 105.16 8.35 692.29 794.77 186.76 1.31 90.87 prepar- SD 41.08 1.39 128.22 197.50 24.94 0.29 14.06 ation) Female N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mean 67.09 6.63 438.93 535.17 180.63 1.88 58.58 SD 9.24 0.62 26.51 59.13 11.64 0.21 2.76 Female + N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 male Mean 86.12 7.49 565.61 664.97 183.70 1.59 74.73 SD 33.82 1.35 161.60 192.92 17.73 0.39 19.87

TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 15 Average pharmacokinetic parameters of SD rats after a single intramuscular injection of Peglocticase and pegylated uricase injections Dose Para- t.sub.1/2 T.sub.max C.sub.max AUC.sub.last AUC.sub.0-∞ Vz_F Cl_F MRT.sub.last (mg/kg) Gender meter (h) (h) (μg/mL) (h*μg/mL) (h*μg/mL) (mL/kg) (mL/h/kg) (h) 1.0 Male N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 (Pegloticase) Mean 58.31 24.00 3.45 318.23 405.13 203.75 2.54 60.57 SD 20.10 0.00 0.31 15.37 80.13 42.90 0.54 6.54 Female N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mean 52.12 24.00 2.75 210.14 278.56 276.83 3.72 51.27 SD 4.78 0.00 0.23 79.35 60.90 50.57 0.91 15.28 Female + N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 male Mean 55.21 24.00 3.10 264.19 341.85 240.29 3.13 55.92 SD 13.50 0.00 0.46 78.22 94.12 57.97 0.93 11.68 0.5 Male N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 (PU5 Mean 63.57 24.00 1.93 181.10 233.11 199.06 2.21 60.26 preparation) SD 18.68 0.00 0.26 79.19 48.71 56.50 0.45 23.89 Female N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mean 48.20 24.00 1.91 170.63 205.87 167.09 2.56 55.67 SD 17.38 0.00 0.14 41.99 61.41 21.47 0.67 11.48 Female + N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 male Mean 55.88 24.00 1.92 175.87 219.49 183.07 2.38 57.97 SD 18.20 0.00 0.19 56.98 51.77 42.05 0.54 16.95 1.0 Male N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 (PU5 Mean 70.47 24.00 3.36 439.83 504.61 225.86 2.57 84.20 preparation) SD 28.55 0.00 1.13 307.66 344.91 54.21 1.32 31.10 Female N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mean 50.44 24.00 2.52 235.90 293.04 252.46 3.46 58.28 SD 5.05 0.00 0.43 58.01 45.24 46.82 0.50 6.96 Female + N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 male Mean 60.45 24.00 2.94 337.86 398.83 239.16 3.02 71.24 SD 21.37 0.00 0.89 227.34 248.66 47.59 1.02 24.65 2.0 Male N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 (PU5 Mean 66.65 24.00 4.84 590.58 649.31 292.61 3.10 85.42 preparation) SD 20.11 0.00 0.46 59.68 55.26 64.39 0.27 19.91 Female N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Mean 72.51 32.00 4.55 537.05 628.72 339.98 3.22 79.26 SD 15.56 13.86 0.91 124.85 78.17 100.19 0.42 9.60 Female + N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 male Mean 69.58 28.00 4.70 563.81 639.01 316.30 3.16 82.34 SD 16.40 9.80 0.66 92.30 61.59 79.67 0.32 14.38

7.2.2. Comparison of In Vivo Efficacy (Uric Acid)

[0171] After a single intramuscular injection of 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 2.0 mg/kg pegylated uricase injection, the uric acid concentration maintained at a low level 1 day and 3 days after the administration, the uric acid level of each dose group began to recover 7 days after the administration, and the higher the dose, the longer the uric acid maintained a lower level in the body. Comparing the intravenous injection groups of the same dose, the PU5 preparation intravenous injection group maintained a low concentration level of serum uric acid for a longer time than the pegloticase intravenous injection group. Comparing the intramuscular injection groups of the same dose, the PU5 preparation intramuscular injection group maintained a low concentration level of serum uric acid for a longer time than the pegloticase intramuscular injection group. Comparing the groups of the same dose, the PU5 preparation intravenous or intramuscular injection group maintained a low concentration level of serum uric acid for a longer time than the pegloticase intravenous or intramuscular injection group, that is, the PU5 preparation maintained a low concentration level of uric acid in the body for a longer time than pegloticase in each case. The results are illustrated in FIG. 17.

7.3 Evaluation of Multiple Administrations of Polyethylene Glycol-Modified Urate Oxidase in Rats

[0172] In this experiment, 4 groups were set, i.e., a marketed drug Pegloticase intravenous injection group, a Pegloticase intramuscular injection group, a pegylated uricase (PU5) intravenous injection group, and a PU5 intramuscular injection group, each group included 8 rats, four of which were male and the other four of which were female, 32 SD rats in total. The Pegloticase and pegylated uricase intravenous injection groups adopted intravenous injection; and the Pegloticase and pegylated uricase intramuscular injection groups adopted intramuscular injection. The administration dose was 1.0 mg/kg, once a week, for 4 consecutive times.

[0173] The result analysis indicates that:

[0174] SD rats were injected intravenously/intramuscularly with 1.0 mg/kg Pegloticase and pegloticase injections for multiple times, The general condition of the rats had no abnormal changes related to the drugs.

7.3.1 Anti-PEG Antibody Detection

[0175] SD rats were administrated for 4 consecutive times. Before the first administration, no anti-PEG antibodies and no anti-PHC antibodies were detected in either individual animal; after the administration, no anti-PHC antibodies were detected in either animal, anti-PEG antibodies were detected in each group of the Pegloticase intravenous and intramuscular injection groups as well as the pegylated uricase intravenous and intramuscular injection groups, and the ratios of positive results were: 3/8, 1/8, 1/8, and 1/8, respectively. The PEG immunohistochemical examination revealed that the spleen, liver and kidney of the pegloticase intravenous and intramuscular injection groups showed weak positive expression of PEG; and no positive expression of PEG was found in the pegylated uricase intravenous and intramuscular injection groups. The results are shown in Table 13.

[0176] It can be seen from the above analysis that the antibodies produced by PU5 preparation and pegloticase are mainly antibodies against the PEG part, rather than antibodies against the urate oxidase part, indicating that both can effectively shield the immunogenic site of urate oxidase. The production of PEG antibodies may cause some side effects in vivo. According to the results in Table 16, the immunogenicity of the PU5 preparation of the present disclosure is lower than that of the commercially available product pegloticase.

[0177] According to the results of PEG antibody and PEG immunohistochemistry, the intramuscular administration groups of both PU5 preparation and pegloticase are superior to the intravenous administration groups thereof. Among them, regarding the produced anti-PEG antibodies of the intravenous administration groups, the PU5 preparation is superior to pegloticase; and regarding the produced anti-PEG antibodies of the intramuscular administration groups, the PU5 preparation is superior to pegloticase.

TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 16 PEG immunohistochemistry positive expression results Incidence PU5 PU5 Pegloticase Pegloticase preparation preparation intravenous intramuscular intravenous intramuscular Microscopic injection group injection Group injection group injection group observation Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Spleen Total inspection 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 number: PEG, white pulp 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 Total incidence 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 number: PEG, red pulp 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total incidence 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 number: Liver Total inspection 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 number: PEG, vascular 1 4 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 endothelial cells/Kupffer cells Total incidence 4 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 number: Kidney Total inspection 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 number: PEG, renal tubules 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 Total incidence 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 number: PEG, vascular 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 endothelial cells Total incidence 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 number: Positive grading: 1 = extremely weakly positive, 2 = weakly positive, 3 = moderately positive, 4 = strongly positive.

4.3.2 Pharmacokinetic Tests

[0178] The SD rats that had received multiple intravenous and intramuscular injections of Pegloticase and pegylated uricase injections exhibited no significant gender difference in the main pharmacokinetic parameters between the groups. After 4 consecutive administrations, these two drugs accumulated slightly in rats.

[0179] When the SD rats received multiple intravenous/intramuscular injection administrations with the same dose (1.0 mg/kg) of the marketed drug Pegloticase, the absolute bioavailability in the rats was 51.35% after the first administration; and the absolute bioavailability in the rats was 45.98% after the last administration. When the SD rats received multiple intravenous/intramuscular injection administrations with the same dose (1.0 mg/kg) of the pegylated uricase injection, the absolute bioavailability in the rats was 58.29% after the first administration; and the absolute bioavailability in the rats was 52.60% after the last administration.

4.3.3 Comparison of In Vivo Drug Efficacy (Uric Acid)

[0180] SD rats were injected intravenously and intramuscularly with 1.0 mg/kg Pegloticase and 1.0 mg/kg pegylated uricase injection for 4 consecutive times (1 time/week), the serum uric acid concentration maintained at a low level after each administration; the serum uric acid concentration recovered 14 days after the last administration in the Pegloticase intramuscular injection group, and in the rest groups, the serum uric acid concentration recovered 18 days after the last administration. Compared with the same dose of the marketed drug Pegloticase, the maintaining time in the intravenous injection groups of these two drugs was basically consistent, and the maintaining time of the pegylated uricase intramuscular injection group was longer than that of the marketed drug intramuscular injection group. That is, for the intramuscular administration, the efficacy of PU5 preparation is superior than that of Pegloticase.

[0181] The results are shown in Tables 17 to 19 and FIGS. 18 to 22.

TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 17 Results of average pharmacokinetic parameters after continuous intravenous injection of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection in SD rats Experiment Dose t.sub.1/2 T.sub.max C.sub.max AUC.sub.last AUC.sub.0-∞ Vz Cl MRT.sub.last time Drug name Gender Parameter (h) (h) (μg/mL) (h*μg/mL) (h*μg/mL) (mL/kg) (mL/h/kg) (h) Day 1 1.0 mg/kg Male N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Pegloticase Mean 72.17 2.13 11.12 632.58 778.65 133.74 1.29 56.91 SD 4.53 1.44 0.28 25.32 45.00 4.49 0.07 1.17 Female N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 66.24 0.50 8.84 514.21 633.80 149.07 1.59 54.93 SD 17.91 0.00 1.07 50.98 64.84 27.23 0.16 7.58 Female + N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 male Mean 69.21 1.31 9.98 573.40 706.22 141.41 1.44 55.92 SD 12.51 1.28 1.42 73.43 93.08 19.84 0.20 5.13 1.0 mg/kg Male N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 PU5 Mean 67.98 1.75 9.47 527.73 634.48 158.66 1.60 55.50 preparation SD 8.87 1.66 0.91 91.07 91.12 39.53 0.22 0.89 Female N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 79.29 1.38 6.42 369.05 481.09 238.12 2.16 59.68 SD 17.07 1.75 0.61 49.11 98.31 15.34 0.53 2.84 Female + N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 male Mean 73.63 1.56 7.94 448.39 557.79 198.39 1.88 57.59 SD 13.97 1.59 1.78 108.54 120.10 50.74 0.48 2.96 Day 22 1.0 mg/kg Male N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Pegloticase Mean 135.63 1.75 12.33 1159.18 1300.99 149.28 0.78 118.29 SD 40.45 1.66 0.94 134.20 208.65 28.13 0.13 9.91 Female N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 96.09 0.88 8.02 672.95 747.61 186.89 1.35 92.46 SD 7.69 0.75 0.87 78.50 78.66 24.21 0.14 9.52 Female + N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 male Mean 115.86 1.31 10.17 916.07 1024.30 168.09 1.07 105.37 SD 34.25 1.28 2.45 279.12 329.86 31.53 0.33 16.48 1.0 mg/kg Male N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 PU5 Mean 149.80 2.25 9.00 840.78 947.08 229.16 1.07 117.99 preparation SD 24.68 2.02 0.73 91.96 104.82 36.69 0.11 6.88 Female N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 103.90 1.25 6.63 576.81 636.52 236.33 1.63 101.66 SD 21.25 0.87 0.72 128.81 128.02 17.98 0.39 20.03 Female + N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 male Mean 126.85 1.75 7.82 708.79 791.80 232.75 1.35 109.82 SD 32.51 1.54 1.44 175.05 198.21 27.02 0.40 16.38

TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 18 Results of average pharmacokinetic parameters after continuous intramuscular injection of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection in SD rats Experiment Dose t.sub.1/2 T.sub.max C.sub.max AUC.sub.last AUC.sub.0-∞ Vz_F Cl_F MRT.sub.last time Drug name Gender Parameter (h) (h) (μg/mL) (h*μg/mL) (h*μg/mL) (mL/kg) (mL/h/kg) (h) Day 1 1.0 mg/kg Male N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Pegloticase Mean 59.68 24.00 3.16 318.22 395.66 217.53 2.54 62.05 SD 13.70 0.00 0.38 29.92 29.26 49.49 0.19 6.59 Female N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 80.53 24.00 2.80 270.69 415.60 282.07 2.48 57.80 SD 16.48 0.00 0.36 66.91 84.31 37.74 0.52 6.21 Female + N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 male Mean 70.11 24.00 2.98 294.46 405.63 249.80 2.51 59.92 SD 17.91 0.00 0.39 54.29 59.39 53.39 0.36 6.35 1.0 mg/kg Male N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 PU5 Mean 82.25 6.00 3.06 290.64 403.89 294.92 2.50 5 61.83 preparation SD 9.79 2.31 0.25 34.67 48.73 29.13 0.31 6.88 Female N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 70.44 48.00 2.21 232.11 306.59 340.32 3.50 66.28 SD 13.41 19.60 0.26 59.53 90.62 46.97 1.09 10.28 Female + N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 male Mean 76.34 27.00 2.63 261.38 355.24 317.62 3.00 64.06 SD 12.57 25.90 0.51 54.89 85.10 43.56 0.91 8.44 Day 22 1.0 mg/kg Male N 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 Pegloticase Mean 198.20 25.00 3.18 486.70 799.90 353.52 1.35 112.01 SD 83.85 18.00 0.85 298.21 293.71 23.56 0.42 60.30 Female N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 97.92 20.00 2.69 355.77 427.75 344.97 2.65 94.51 SD 33.98 8.00 0.71 134.18 155.69 88.41 1.19 30.45 Female + N 7 8 8 8 7 7 7 8 male Mean 140.90 22.50 2.93 421.23 587.25 348.64 2.09 103.26 SD 76.12 13.17 0.77 225.23 283.63 64.14 1.12 45.20 1.0 mg/kg Male N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 PU5 Mean 140.04 15.00 2.52 395.82 478.83 610.95 9.64 102.76 preparation SD 90.61 10.52 1.15 255.45 300.26 419.13 16.09 61.50 Female N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 122.51 30.00 2.41 349.84 428.61 416.41 2.82 103.39 SD 59.33 12.00 0.50 178.08 204.30 72.32 1.36 44.91 Female + N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 male Mean 131.27 22.50 2.46 372.83 453.72 513.68 6.23 103.08 SD 71.52 13.17 0.82 205.33 239.26 297.23 11.18 49.85

TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 19 Statistical results of uric acid in each dose group after multiple intramuscular/intravenous injections of Pegloticase and a pegylated uricase injection in SD rats (Mean + SD) 1.0 mg/kg 1.0 mg/kg 1.0 mg/kg 1.0 mg/kg Pegloticase Pegloticase PU5 preparation PU5 preparation Intravenous Intramuscular Intravenous Intramuscular Gender injection group injection group injection group injection group Detection time n X ± SD n X ± SD n X ± SD n X ± SD Male Before 1.sup.st 4 71.250 ± 19.103 4 62.250 ± 5.315  4 58.750 ± 7.632  4 50.750 ± 6.850  administration 3 days after 1.sup.st 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 0 ± 0 4 0 ± 0 administration Before 2.sup.nd 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 69.750 ± 46.133 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 0.250 ± 0.500 administration 3 days after 2.sup.nd 4 1.000 ± 0     4 20.750 ± 40.178 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 17.500 ± 33.670 administration Before 3.sup.rd 4 1.000 ± 0     4 26.500 ± 30.116 4 1.250 ± 0.957 4 18.000 ± 32.680 administration 3 days after 3.sup.rd 4 1.000 ± 0.816 4 19.000 ± 37.336 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 20.500 ± 38.336 administration Before 4.sup.th 4 0 ± 0 4 15.500 ± 31.000 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 19.250 ± 37.170 administration 1 day after 4.sup.th 4 0.750 ± 0.500 4 1.750 ± 1.500 4 0.750 ± 0.500 4  9.750 ± 16.840 administration 3 days after 4.sup.th 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 10.500 ± 21.000 4 0 ± 0 4 12.750 ± 24.838 administration 7 days after 4.sup.th 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 22.250 ± 44.500 4 0 ± 0 4 16.250 ± 31.837 administration 10 days after 4.sup.th 4 0 ± 0 4 20.000 ± 38.670 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 16.000 ± 30.681 administration 14 days after 4.sup.th 4 1.250 ± 0.500 4 29.250 ± 28.123 4 2.000 ± 0.816 4 19.250 ± 30.015 administration 18 days after 4.sup.th 4 25.000 ± 10.296 4 53.500 ± 14.933 4 24.000 ± 13.614 4 50.000 ± 29.833 administration Female Before 1.sup.st 4 61.250 ± 8.057  4 63.000 ± 15.470 4 50.250 ± 7.500  4 43.250 ± 9.743  administration 3 days after 1.sup.st 4 0 ± 0 4 0 ± 0 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 0 ± 0 administration Before 2.sup.nd 4 42.000 ± 48.132 4 38.250 ± 44.507 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 4.000 ± 7.348 administration 3 days after 2.sup.nd 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 40.250 ± 41.080 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 0.500 ± 0.577 administration Before 3.sup.rd 4 19.500 ± 35.01  4 46.750 ± 28.547 4 1.000 ± 0.816 4 13.500 ± 25.000 administration 3 days after 3.sup.rd 4 1.250 ± 0.500 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 0.750 ± 0.500 4 0.750 ± 0.500 administration Before 4.sup.th 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 33.750 ± 40.285 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 3.750 ± 6.850 administration 1 day after 4.sup.th 4 0.750 ± 0.500 4 3.000 ± 2.708 4 0.500 ± 0.577 4 1.250 ± 0.500 administration 3 days after 4.sup.th 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 0 ± 0 4 0 ± 0 4 0 ± 0 administration 7 days after 4.sup.th 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4  6.750 ± 12.842 4 1.000 ± 0     4 1.750 ± 1.258 administration 10 days after 4.sup.th 4 0 ± 0 4  8.500 ± 16.340 4 0.250 ± 0.500 4 2.000 ± 2.828 administration 14 days after 4.sup.th 4 6.750 ± 7.089 4 33.500 ± 19.689 4 1.500 ± 0.577 4 9.500 ± 8.699 administration 18 days after 4.sup.th 4 48.000 ± 24.993 4 54.750 ± 4.031  4 14.000 ± 6.00.   4 32.000 ± 13.638 administration

[0182] In the specification, descriptions with reference to the terms “an embodiment”, “some embodiments”, “examples”, “specific examples”, or “some examples”, etc., mean specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present disclosure. In this specification, the above terms are illustrative, and do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the described specific features, structures, materials or characteristics can be combined in a suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples. In addition, those skilled in the art can combine the different embodiments or examples and the features of the different embodiments or examples described in this specification without contradicting each other.

[0183] While embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described, it will be understood that the above-described embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive, and that changes, modifications, substitutions, and variations may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.