Decontamination of water using guar gum derivatives and applications thereof
11807553 · 2023-11-07
Assignee
Inventors
- Nagaraja Sreeharsha (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Anroop B. Nair (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Mahesh Attimarad (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Katharigatta N. Venugopala (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Bandar Aldhubiab (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Sonia Kundu (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Aalok Basu (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Suvadra Das (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Partha Roy (Al-Ahsa, SA)
- Teeka Sathiesh Roopashree (Al-Ahsa, SA)
Cpc classification
C02F1/286
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
Decontamination of water using guar gum (GG) derivatives and applications thereof are provided herein. For water decontamination, guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) is fabricated into nanoparticles having a high surface area that facilitates the removal of water pollutants by adsorption. Owing to its high availability, low cost, slow biodegradability and high sustainability, GG is considered promising as a next generation cost effective green material for water decontamination.
Claims
1. A method for decontaminating water, the method comprising: providing nanoparticles of a high degree of substitution (DS) guar gum cinnamate (GGCi); contacting the nanoparticles of a high degree of substitution guar gum cinnamate with water contaminated with one or more organic dyes; and adsorbing the one or more organic dyes from the water contaminated with one or more organic dyes onto a surface of the nanoparticles of a high degree of substitution guar gum cinnamate, thereby decontaminating the water.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles are hydrophobic.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the one or more organic dyes are selected from the group consisting of Bisphenol A, Methylene Blue, and combinations thereof.
4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles result in microbial decontamination of the water.
5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the contaminated water is effluent water.
6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles are dispersed in the contaminated water.
7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles have a particle size of about 200 nm to about 300 nm.
8. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the nanoparticles have a particle size of about 289 nm.
9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles have a Polydispersity Index (PDI) of about 0.43.
10. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles have a Zeta-potential of about 16.5 mV to about 21.5 mV.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(8) The following definitions are provided for the purpose of understanding the present subject matter and for construing the appended patent claims.
(9) Throughout the application, where compositions are described as having, including, or comprising specific components, or where processes are described as having, including, or comprising specific process steps, it is contemplated that compositions of the present teachings can also consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited components, and that the processes of the present teachings can also consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited process steps.
(10) It is noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
(11) In the application, where an element or component is said to be included in and/or selected from a list of recited elements or components, it should be understood that the element or component can be any one of the recited elements or components, or the element or component can be selected from a group consisting of two or more of the recited elements or components. Further, it should be understood that elements and/or features of a composition or a method described herein can be combined in a variety of ways without departing from the spirit and scope of the present teachings, whether explicit or implicit herein.
(12) The use of the terms “include,” “includes”, “including,” “have,” “has,” or “having” should be generally understood as open-ended and non-limiting unless specifically stated otherwise.
(13) The use of the singular herein includes the plural (and vice versa) unless specifically stated otherwise. In addition, where the use of the term “about” is before a quantitative value, the present teachings also include the specific quantitative value itself, unless specifically stated otherwise. As used herein, the term “about” refers to a ±10% variation from the nominal value unless otherwise indicated or inferred.
(14) The term “optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where said event or circumstance occurs and instances in which it does not.
(15) Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which the presently described subject matter pertains.
(16) Where a range of values is provided, for example, concentration ranges, percentage ranges, or ratio ranges, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range, is encompassed within the described subject matter. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included in the smaller ranges, and such embodiments are also encompassed within the described subject matter, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the described subject matter.
(17) Throughout the application, descriptions of various embodiments use “comprising” language. However, it will be understood by one of skill in the art, that in some specific instances, an embodiment can alternatively be described using the language “consisting essentially of” or “consisting of”.
(18) For purposes of better understanding the present teachings and in no way limiting the scope of the teachings, unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities, percentages or proportions, and other numerical values used in the specification and claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about”. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained. At the very least, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
(19) In one embodiment, the present subject matter relates to a process of manufacturing high degree of substitution (DS) guar gum (GG) derivatives comprising guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) by a highly exothermic reaction using the Hofmeister cation Li. The process includes the steps of washing raw guar gum (GG) with an organic solvent-water blend before conducting a derivatization reaction. Guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) can be synthesized in Hofmeister ion guided homogeneous phase reactions involving decanting, LiCl, DMSO, nitrogen purging, a reflux condenser, heating, cinnamoyl chloride, cooling, filtering and obtaining the GGCi precipitate product. Different molar ratios of cinnamoyl chloride to polymer can be used to obtain high degree of substitution (DS) products. The GGCi product can then be characterized by routine analysis.
(20) In another embodiment, the present subject matter relates to a method of fabricating the high DS guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) into nanoparticles. GGCi nanoparticles can be prepared by a facile nanoprecipitation technique. GGCi dissolved in DMSO in a dialysis bag can be placed in deionized water under constant magnetic stirring. After a period of time, the contents in the dialysis bag are lyophilized to powders for analysis by routine methods.
(21) The thus obtained nanoparticles can have a particle size of about 200 nm to about 300 nm. Table 1 below shows certain physical characteristics for the expected GGCi nanoparticles:
(22) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Compound Particle size (nm) PDI Zeta-potential (mV) GGCi nanoparticles 289 0.43 −19 ± 2.5
(23) As seen in Table 1, a sample of GGCi nanoparticles produced according to the present methods has a particle size of about 289 nm with a Polydispersity Index (PDI) of about 0.43. The PDI value indicates the GGCi nanoparticles can produce stable colloidal dispersions in aqueous solutions. Further the zeta potential (ζ) of the particles was observed at −19±2.5 mV, or from about 16.6 mV to about 21.5 mV. This suggests the formation of very stable nanoparticle suspension by electrostatic stabilization are possible. Further, as seen in
(24) In further embodiments of the present subject matter, the guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) nanoparticles are hydrophobic and the process for preparing guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) nanoparticles comprises a simple energy efficient process termed as the ‘ouzo effect’. Solvent diffusion, phase change, and self-assembly formations can result in the formation of nearly spherical nanoparticles. Biopolymers possessing surface hydrophobic groups can otherwise form similar nanoparticles. The resultant nanoparticles are hydrophobic. The initial concentration of GGCi is a governing factor in determining the size of the nanoparticles formed. Diffusion of DMSO in water can result in Marangoni mass transfer effects' which lead to biopolymer chain associations and self-assembly nanoparticle generation.
(25) The results of NMR and FTIR analyses of thus produced GG and GGCi can be found in Table 2 and
(26) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Compound Spectroscopy Salient Peaks Description Guar gum (GG) FTIR 3430 cm.sup.−1 —OH stretching 2922 cm.sup.−1 —CH.sub.2 stretching 1079 cm.sup.−1 Glycosidic linkage —C.sub.6—O—C.sub.1 1072 cm.sup.−1 Sugar ether .sup.13C-NMR 70 ppm Pyranose carbon atoms 63 ppm C.sub.6 carbon atom 100 ppm C.sub.1 carbon in the polysaccharide backbone Guar gum FTIR 3415 cm.sup.−1 —OH stertching cinnamate (GGCi) 1709 cm.sup.−1 —C═O stretching 1636 cm.sup.−1 —C═C stretching .sup.13C-NMR 71 Pyranose carbon ppm atoms 103 ppm C.sub.1 carbon in the polysaccharide backbone 167 ppm —C═O carbon atom 147, 118 ppm —C═C unsaturated carbon atoms 134, 130 ppm Aromatic carbon atoms of the cinnamate moeity
(27) In an embodiment, the present subject matter relates to a method for decontaminating water comprising using high DS guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) nanoparticles to remove organic dyes and pollutants via adsorption from water along with microbial load elimination, wherein the hydrophobic nanoparticles aid in microbial decontamination.
(28) In this regard, in one embodiment, the present subject matter relates to a method for decontaminating water, the method comprising: providing nanoparticles of a high degree of substitution (DS) guar gum cinnamate (GGCi); contacting the nanoparticles of a high degree of substitution guar gum cinnamate with contaminated water; and adsorbing pollutants from the contaminated water onto a surface of the nanoparticles of a high degree of substitution guar gum cinnamate, thereby decontaminating the water.
(29) In further embodiments, the nanoparticles are hydrophobic, and the method of water decontamination by the high DS GGCi nanoparticles comprises removal of organic dyes, such as, by way of non-limiting example, Bisphenol A, Methylene Blue, and combinations thereof, as well as potentially other pollutants carried out by a simple adsorption process. Furthermore, the hydrophobic nanoparticles can result in microbial decontamination of the previously contaminated water. In certain embodiments, the water to be decontaminated is effluent water, for example, effluent water used in various chemical manufacturing processes.
(30) In certain embodiments of carrying out the present water decontamination methods, the nanoparticles are dispersed in the contaminated water. In this regard, the dispersed nanoparticles can have a particle size of about 200 nm to about 300 nm, or of about 289 nm. In additional embodiments, the nanoparticles used in the present decontamination methods can be nearly spherical. In further embodiments, the nanoparticles used in the present decontamination methods can have a Polydispersity Index (PDI) of about 0.43 and a Zeta-potential of about 16.5 mV to about 21.5 mV.
(31) As shown in Table 3, the present methods can provide the following amounts of adsorption of the pollutants Bisphenol A and Methylene Blue dye removed successfully from effluent water using the present GGCi nanoparticles.
(32) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Pollutants Amount adsorbed Isotherm Bisphenol A 610 μg/g Freudlich Methylene Blue 75 mg/g Langmuir
(33) In other embodiments, the present subject matter includes using the present GGCi nanoparticles for antibacterial purposes, including, by way of non-limiting example, against E. coli and S. aureus.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Homogeneous Phase Synthesis of Guar Gum Cinnamate (GGCi)
(34) Raw guar gum (GG) was washed by a facile solvent water washing technique before a derivatization reaction was conducted. Guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) was synthesized in Hofmeister ion guided homogeneous phase reactions. Briefly, 5 g of washed GG was soaked in 300 mL 50% (v/v) aqueous isopropanol for 24 h. The solution was decanted off and the GG residue was added to 80 mL DMSO under continuous stirring (200 rpm). 2 g of LiCl previously dissolved in 20 mL DMSO was added to the solution and stirred briefly to obtain a clear homogeneous solution. The contents were then transferred to a 250 mL three necked round bottomed flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, nitrogen purging unit and a reflux condenser.
(35) The reaction setup was placed over an electrical heating mantle and the temperature was maintained at 30±2° C. throughout. DMAP (11.29 g) dissolved in 5 mL DMSO was added and stirred at 80 rpm for 30 min for equilibration. Cinnamoyl chloride (14 mL) was added dropwise under nitrogen purging (5 mL min-1). The reaction was carried for a further 3.5 h under stirring and nitrogen purging until completion. The solution was then poured into ice cold aqueous ethanol (300 mL, 50%) and kept overnight. The solution was filtered thereafter and the white fluffy precipitate of GGCi was collected and further washed with distilled water several times. Finally, GGCi was soxhlated against methanol and the leachants checked free from aromatic acids by UV spectrophotometer. GGCi was collected and preserved in screw cap airtight bottles in desiccators for further applications. This process is summarized as shown in
(36) Different molar ratios of cinnamoyl chloride to polymer were used to obtain high degree of substitution (DS) products. Hofmeister ion guided homogeneous phase synthesis of different high DS guar cinnamate was reported. Cinnamoyl chloride was used as the reagent and DMAP acted as an acid scavenger. The reaction was fast and exothermic and hence maintained at 30±2° C. In the DMSO solvent system, LiCl ion pairs acted as chaotropes and increased the disorder within the polymer network, thus facilitating substitution. Furthermore, the undissociated ion pairs of LiCl in polar solvents like DMSO, reacted with the hydroxyl group in GG to hinder the reformation of intra molecular H-bonds.
(37) The obtained GGCi product had a degree of substitution (DS) of 1.4, as seen in Table 4, which was achieved when the ratio of anhydrohexose unit of GG to cinnamoyl chloride was 1:3.
(38) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Molar ratio of anhydro- C, H, N C, H, N sugar analysis analysis unit to (wt %) (wt %) Degree of cinnamoyl Corrected Experimental Substitution Compound chloride C H N C H N (DS) Guar gum — 44.44 6.17 — 39.90 6.20 — — (GG) Guar gum 1:3 34.21 5.32 — 30.82 5.35 — 1.40 cinnamate (GGCi)
(39) Unreacted acids and aromatics were removed by several washings with distilled water and finally by soxhlation against methanol. GGCi obtained was readily soluble in DMSO (10 mg/mL) but insoluble in water and ionic solvents.
Example 2
Guar Gum Cinnamate Nanoparticles Synthesis
(40) GGCi nanoparticles were prepared by a facile nanoprecipitation technique. 10 mL of GGCi dissolved in DMSO (5 mg mL-1) was taken in a dialysis bag and placed in 1000 mL deionized water under constant magnetic stirring (200 rpm) for 30 h. The water was replaced with fresh water after every 3 h. After 30 h, the contents in the dialysis bag were transferred into a round bottomed flask and lyophilized to powders for analysis. Also, the bag contents were preserved in screw cap bottles and stored at 4° C.
Example 3
Characterization of Guar Gum Cinnamate and Nanoparticles
(41) The degree of substitution (DS) of GGCi was routinely determined by elemental analysis. The analysis was carried out by the combustion technique in a CHN analyser. Solid state .sup.13C-NMR of GG and GGCi was studied. Infra-red spectra of GG and GGCi were recorded in a FTIR spectrometer. The samples were pelletized with KBr (IR grade, Merck, India), and scanned over the wavelength range of 400-4000 cm-1 with background corrections of 64.
(42) The particle size, polydispersity index (PDI) and zeta-potential (Q of guar gum cinnamate nanoparticles were recorded in DLS. The nanoparticles were dispersed in HPLC grade water and exposed to a 4 mW helium-neon laser beam at 633 nm, with a back scattering angle of 173°. Analysis was done in triplicate and data was averaged. Nanoparticles shape and morphology were analyzed in a scanning electron microscope. Samples were diluted with HPLC water, drop cast onto cover slips, dried for 24 h and sputter coated with platinum at 15 kV and analyzed in Smart SEM software.
Example 4
Antibacterial Results
(43) Antibacterial studies were evaluated using standard E. coli (MTCC 44) and S. aureus (MTCC 160) strains. Ciprofloxacin was used as the negative control. The MIC for GGCi and guar gum cinnamate nanoparticles was 600 and 300 μg mL-1 respectively in E. coli and 1000 and 500 μg/mL respectively in S. aureus (see Table 5). Thus, the effect of nanoparticles in bacterial growth retardation was twice that of the native GGCi. This was due to the increase in specific surface area of the spherical nanoparticles which augmented cell contact and resulted in cell death. Bacterial contact killing was very much prominent for nanoparticles than GGCi as observed from the killing kinetics experiment.
(44) Growth retardation was faster in the case of E. coli than for S. aureus (See
(45) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Compound Bacteria MIC (μg/ml) GGCi E. coli 600 S. aureus 1000 GGCi nanoparticles E. coli 300 S. aureus 500
(46) It is to be understood that the decontamination of water using guar gum guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) nanoparticles and the guar gum cinnamate (GGCi) and GGCi nanoparticles fabrication processes are not limited to the specific embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the generic language of the following claims enabled by the embodiments described herein, or otherwise shown in the drawings or described above in terms sufficient to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the claimed subject matter.