METHOD OF IN-SITU REPAIR OF AN ULTRA-LARGE SINGLE-PIECE CASTING
20230339052 · 2023-10-26
Inventors
- Daniel J. Wilson (Linden, MI, US)
- Liang Wang (Rochester Hills, MI, US)
- Qigui Wang (Rochester Hills, MI)
- Devin R. Hess (Clarkston, MI, US)
- Michelle A. Wood (Lake Orion, MI, US)
- Ali Shabbir (Windsor, CA)
- Ronald C. Daul (Northville, MI, US)
- Dale A. Gerard (Warren, MI, US)
- Gregory Melekian (Clarkston, MI, US)
Cpc classification
B23P6/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23P6/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A method of repairing an ultra-large single-piece cast component of a vehicle body. The method includes the steps of locating a damaged portion of the cast component, determining an extent of the damaged portion of the ultra-large cast component, defining a cut-line sectioning off the damaged portion from an undamaged portion of the ultra-large cast component, cutting along the cut-line to excise the damaged portion from the undamaged portion of the ultra-large cast component, and joining a replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the ultra-large cast component. The replacement piece is fabricated based on the original manufacturer’s geometry and dimensional data of the excised damaged portion. The undamaged portion of the ultra-large cast component remains on the vehicle body during the repair.
Claims
1. A method of repairing a cast component, comprising: locating a damaged portion of the cast component; determining an extent of the damaged portion of the cast component; defining a cut-line sectioning off the damaged portion from an undamaged portion of the cast component; cutting along the cut-line to excise the damaged portion from the undamaged portion of the cast component; and joining a replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the cast component.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the extent of the damaged portion of the cast component, comprising: determining whether the damaged portion includes a load bearing structure; and defining the cut-line to avoid cutting into the load bearing structure when the damaged portion does not include the load bearing structure.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein joining the replacement piece includes using a structural adhesive to join the replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the cast component when the damaged portion does not include the load bearing structure.
4. The method of claim 2, further comprises defining the cut-line to include a damaged load bearing structure portion when the damaged portion includes the load bearing structure.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein joining the replacement piece includes one of welding the replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the cast component and bolting the replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the cast component.
6. The method of claim 4, further comprising using a Direct Energy Deposition additive manufacturing to fabricate the replacement piece directly onto the undamaged portion of the cast component.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising designing the replacement piece by using geometry and dimension data from a design specification of the cast component.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising fabricating the replacement piece by additive manufacturing including at least one of a friction stir additive manufacturing, a powder bed fusion (PBF), a direct energy deposition (DED), and a droplet on demand (DOD) using cast aluminum alloy feed stock and powders.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising manufacturing the replacement piece including 3-D printing a sand mold using a geometry and dimension data from a design specification of the cast component, pouring a molten alloy into the 3-D printed sand mold, and solidifying the molten alloy by cooling.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein joining the replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the cast component includes: providing a plurality of bolt brackets on the replacement piece, wherein each of the plurality bolt brackets defines a bolt through-hole; drilling a plurality of bolt through-holes on the undamaged portion of the cast component, wherein the drilled bolt through-holes correspond to the bolt through-holes of the brackets when the replacement piece is joined to the undamaged portion of the cast component; and bolting the replacement piece onto the undamaged portion of the cast component.
11. A method of in-situ repairing of an ultra-large casting of a vehicle body component, comprising: locating a damaged portion of the ultra-large casting; inspecting the damaged portion to determine whether a load bearing structure is damaged; defining a cut-line to avoid the load bearing structure when the load bearing structure is not damaged and defining the cut-line to include a damaged load bearing structure portion when the load bearing structure is damaged; cutting through the ultra-large casting at the cut-line to remove the damaged portion from an undamaged portion of the ultra-large casting; and joining a replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the ultra-large casting to replace the damaged portion.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the ultra-large casting includes a width of at least 0.8 meter (m), a length of at least 1 m, and a height of at least 0.25 m.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein joining the replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the ultra-large casting includes using a structural adhesive when the load bearing structure is not damaged.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein joining the replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the ultra-large casting includes welding the replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the ultra-large casting when load bearing structure is damaged.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein joining the replacement piece to the undamaged portion of the ultra-large casting includes printing the replacement piece using Direct Energy Deposition (DED) directly onto the undamaged portion of the ultra-large casting.
16. The method of claim 11, further comprising fabricating the replacement piece including: 3-D printing a sand mold using a geometry and dimension data from a design specification of the ultra-large casting; pouring a molten alloy into the 3-D printed sand mold; and solidifying the molten alloy by cooling.
17. The method of claim 11, further comprising additive manufacturing the replacement piece by including at least one of a friction stir additive manufacturing, a powder bed fusion (PBF), a direct energy deposition (DED), and a droplet on demand (DOD) using cast aluminum alloy feed stock and powders.
18. A method of in-situ repairing of an ultra-large die casting cast in a 2-piece die, comprising: defining a cut-line sectioning off a damaged portion from an undamaged portion of the ultra-large casting; excising the damaged portion by cutting along the cut-line; fabricating a replacement piece; and joining the replacement piece to the ultra-large casting in place of the excised damaged portion; and wherein the ultra-large die casting includes a projected area of at least 0.3 m.sup.2 on a projection plane parallel to a parting plane of the 2-piece die.
19. The method of claim 18, further comprising: determining a damaged load bearing structure; defining the cut-line to include the damaged load bearing structure; and one of welding the replacement piece to the ultra-large casting and bolting the replacement piece to the ultra-large casting.
20. The method of claim 18, further comprising: determining a damaged load bearing structure; defining the cut-line to include the damaged load bearing structure; and printing the replacement piece using Direct Energy Deposition (DED) directly onto the ultra-large casting in place of the excised damaged portion.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0022] The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0043] The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. The illustrated embodiments are disclosed with reference to the drawings, wherein like numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several drawings. The figures are not necessarily to scale, and some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular features. The specific structural and functional details disclosed are not intended to be interpreted as limiting, but as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art as to how to practice the disclosed concepts.
[0044]
[0045] It should be appreciated that ultra-large single-piece castings 100 are not limited to ultra-large floor castings 100 but may include any other die-cast components, such as a battery tray of an electric vehicle, having a projected area of at least 0.3 m.sup.2 on a projection plane parallel to the parting plane of the 2-piece die. Additionally, ultra-large single-piece castings 100 may include die and other forms of castings that have dimensions of at least 1.0 m in length, at least 0.8 m in width, and at least 0.25 m in averaged height.
[0046]
[0047]
[0048] In Block 304, the damaged portion 402 of the ultra-large casting is located and analyzed to determine an appropriate repair solution. The damaged portion 402 is inspected to determine the extent of the damage including determining whether there is damage to the load bearing structure 208. A repair solution is developed based on the location of the damaged portion 402 and whether the damaged portion 402 includes damage to the load bearing structure 208. Moving to Block 306 from Block 304.
[0049] In Block 306, the repair solution includes defining a cut-line 550, 650, best shown in
[0050] Referring to
[0051] In Block 308, the replacement piece is designed using the geometry and dimensions in the design prints and design data of an undamaged ultra-large casting 200. In one embodiment, the replacement piece may be rapidly fabricated using additive manufacturing including powder bed fusion (PBF), direct energy deposition (DED), and droplet on demand (DOD) using cast aluminum alloy feed stock and powders. In another embodiment, the replacement piece may be cast by pouring molten alloy into sand mold that was 3-D printed using the original manufacturer’s design data. The additively manufactured replacement piece and the sand cast replacement piece may be heat treated and machined to original specification before being joined to the undamaged portion 404 of the ultra-large casting 200. The Method 300 moves to Block 310 from Block 308 when the damaged portion 402 does not include a portion of the load bearing structure 208, or the Method 300 moves to Block 312 from Block 308 when the damaged portion 402 does include a damaged load bearing structure portion 622.
[0052] In Block 310, referring to
[0053] In Block 312, referring to
[0054] Referring to
[0055] Referring to
[0056] In an alternative embodiment, the replacement piece may be directly printed onto the ultra-large casting along the cut-interface using Direct Energy Deposition (DED). DED is one type of additive manufacturing method that adds material alongside a simultaneous heat input. The heat input can either be a laser, electron beam, or plasma arc. The material feedstock is either metal powder or wire. Moving to Block 314 from Block 312.
[0057] In Block 314, if the replacement piece was directly printed onto the ultra-large casting along the cut line, the DED printed replacement piece may be machined to specifications. The Method 300 ends.
[0058] The Method 300 may be applied to any size of castings, but more beneficial to ultra-large and complex casting, such as mega/giga casting. Based on computer aided engineering analysis, the mechanical and physical performance of an in-situ repaired ultra-large casting, in accordance with Method 300, is at least as good as or better than an undamaged original ultra-large casting. The additively manufactured replacement piece can be specifically designed, using computer simulation tools such as, but not limited to, topology optimization or generative design, to achieve equivalent performance to the original casting. This can be inclusive of select or all replacement piece performance requirements and enable the same or dissimilar materials to be used for the replacement piece.
[0059] The description of the present disclosure is merely exemplary in nature and variations that do not depart from the general sense of the present disclosure are intended to be within the scope of the present disclosure. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.