Decarbonization of concrete through cement replacement of calcium carbide residue and accelerated carbonation curing

Abstract

A system and a method for concrete production is disclosed. In some implementations, the method comprises the steps of mixing of a calcium carbide residue (CCR) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to produce a CCR-OPC blended concrete, incorporating the CCR-OPC blended concrete in its fresh or hardened state to a carbonation chamber for accelerated carbonation curing, and producing a carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete after the accelerated carbonation curing. The CCR-OPC blended concrete is exposed to a carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) gas to promote a plurality of properties. The system includes a blending module and a carbonation chamber. The blending module mixes CCR and OPC to produce a CCR-OPC blended concrete, and the carbonation chamber performs accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete in its fresh or semi-hardened state to produce a carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete.

Claims

1. A method for a concrete production, comprising: mixing of a calcium carbide residue (CCR) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to produce CCR-OPC blended concrete; incorporating the CCR-OPC blended concrete in its fresh or semi-hardened state to a carbonation chamber for accelerated carbonation curing of the semi-hardened CCR-OPC blended concrete; and producing carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete after the accelerated carbonation curing.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the CCR-OPC blended concrete is exposed in its fresh or semi-hardened state to carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) gas to enhance a plurality of properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the plurality of properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete comprises strength gain, durability, and a permanent sequester of the carbon dioxide gas.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the CCR is an industrial by-product and is composed of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH).sub.2.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the ordinary Portland cement is replaced by up to 20% of the calcium carbide residue, by mass.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is obtained by mixing of a cementitious binder, an aggregate and water.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the calcium carbide residue incorporation reduces overall carbon footprint of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete depends on a quantity of the CCR, initial air curing duration, and accelerated carbonation curing duration.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein incorporation of the CCR and the accelerated carbonation curing affects performance of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete which is evaluated through CO.sub.2 uptake, compressive strength, and volume of permeable voids.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the CO.sub.2 uptake is increased by extending the accelerated carbonation curing duration.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the CO.sub.2 uptake is increased by prolonging the initial air curing duration of the semi-hardened CCR-OPC blended concrete.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the CCR is in solid powder form is incorporated as a partial replacement of the OPC.

13. A system for concrete production, comprising: a blending module for mixing of calcium carbide residue (CCR) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to produce a CCR-OPC blended concrete; and a carbonation chamber for performing accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete in its fresh or semi-hardened state, thereby resulting in carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the CCR-OPC blended concrete is exposed in its fresh or semi-hardened state to carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) gas to enhance a plurality of properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete.

15. The system of claim 13, wherein the plurality of properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete comprise strength gain, durability, and a permanent sequester of the carbon dioxide gas.

16. The system of claim 13, wherein the CCR is an industrial waste by-product and is composed of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH).sub.2.

17. The system of claim 13, wherein the CCR in solid powder form is incorporated as a partial replacement of the OPC.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention are understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.

(2) FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a method for a concrete production, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

(3) FIG. 2 illustrates a table of a test matrix, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(4) FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic of an accelerated carbonation curing process, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(5) FIG. 4 is a graph that illustrates a CO.sub.2 uptake result, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(6) FIG. 5 is a graph that illustrates a total CO.sub.2 reduction of CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(7) FIG. 6 is a graph that illustrates the 1-day compressive strength of CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(8) FIG. 7 is a graph that illustrates the 28-day compressive strength of CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(9) FIG. 8 is a graph that illustrates the volume of permeable voids of CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes measured at an age of 28 days, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(10) FIG. 9 provides a schematic representation of a system for a concrete production, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

ELEMENT LIST

(11) Carbonation chamber 302 Safety valve 304 Pressure regulators 306 CO.sub.2 cylinder 308 Lime water 310 Valve 312 A plurality of concrete samples 314 Blending module 902

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(12) The present invention relates to a system and a method for a cement production for reducing an overall carbon footprint of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete. Further, the CCR incorporation in the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete enhances its carbon sequestration potential, as CCR is rich in calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH).sub.2], promotes the concept of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), improves the mechanical and durability properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete.

(13) The principles of the present invention and their advantages are best understood by referring to FIG. 1 to FIG. 9. In the following detailed description of illustrative or exemplary embodiments of the disclosure, specific embodiments in which the disclosure may be practiced are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosed embodiments. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present disclosure is defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof. References within the specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” “embodiments,” or “one or more embodiments” are intended to indicate that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present disclosure.

(14) In accordance with the present invention, decarbonization of concrete and reduction in its carbon footprint is two-fold. On one hand, cement is partially replaced with CCR, which has no carbon footprint (i.e., zero CO.sub.2 emissions). On the other hand, incorporating CCR in concrete enhances its carbon sequestration potential, as CCR is rich in calcium hydroxide Ca(OH).sub.2 while positively impacting its performance. Accordingly, the present invention promotes the concept of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), decarbonizes concrete, and improves its mechanical and durability properties.

(15) This invention relates to a method to reduce the carbon footprint of concrete production by using an industrial waste by-product calcium carbide residue (CCR), as a partial replacement for ordinary Portland cement (OPC), wherein the concrete is made of a cementitious binder, aggregates, and water. Cement is replaced by up to 20% calcium carbide residue, by mass. The produced CCR-OPC blended concrete is exposed to accelerated carbonation curing in a controlled environment. The accelerated carbonation curing regime is a process in which concrete is exposed to carbon dioxide gas at an early age (within 24 hours) to promote rapid strength gain, enhance durability, and permanently sequesters the carbon dioxide gas in concrete. The accelerated carbonation curing process for CCR-OPC blended concrete is affected by the quantity of CCR, initial air curing duration, and accelerated carbonation curing duration. Calcium carbide residue incorporation promotes a higher degree of carbonation wherein the compressive strength and volume of permeable voids are enhanced by the replacement of cement by calcium carbide residue, increasing the initial air curing duration, and prolonging the carbonation duration.

(16) FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a method 100 for a concrete production, according to an embodiment of the present invention. The methods include a calcium carbide residue (CCR), an ordinary Portland cement (OPC), a CCR-OPC (calcium carbide residue-ordinary Portland cement) blended concrete, a carbonation chamber 302 (Refer to FIG. 3).

(17) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the calcium carbide residue (CCR) is mixed with the ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to produce the CCR-OPC blended concrete, as shown in step 105. Further, the CCR in a solid powder form is incorporated as a replacement of the OPC. Further, the CCR-OPC blended concrete in its fresh or semi-hardened state is incorporated to the carbonation chamber 302 (Refer to FIG. 3) for an accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete, as shown in step 110. In the last step, a carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is produced after the accelerated carbonation curing, as shown in 115. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the CCR-OPC blended concrete is exposed to a carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) gas to promote a plurality of properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete. Further, the plurality of properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is a rapid strength gain, an enhanced durability, and a permanent sequester of the carbon dioxide gas.

(18) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the Calcium carbide residue (CCR) is an industrial waste by product of the acetylene gas industry. It is mainly composed of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH).sub.2, which readily reacts with the CO.sub.2 gas in the presence of water. Unlike the analytical grade, calcium hydroxide, the CCR is an industrial waste by-product, not pure Ca(OH).sub.2.

(19) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is replaced by up to 20% of the calcium carbide residue, by mass. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is obtained by mixing of a cementitious binder, an aggregate, and water. Further, the calcium carbide residue incorporation reduced an overall carbon footprint of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete.

(20) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete is affected by a quantity of the CCR, an initial air curing duration, and an accelerated carbonation curing duration.

(21) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the incorporation of the CCR and the accelerated carbonation curing affect the performance of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete that is evaluated through a CO.sub.2 uptake, a compressive strength, and a volume of permeable voids.

(22) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the CO.sub.2 absorption is increased by extending the accelerated carbonation curing duration and prolonging the initial air curing duration of the CCR-OPC blended concrete. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the compressive strength and the volume of permeable voids of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete are enhanced by replacing the OPC with the CCR, prolonging the accelerated carbonation curing duration, and increasing the initial air curing duration.

(23) FIG. 2 illustrates a table of a test matrix, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Several process parameters affect the efficiency of the accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete, i.e., CO.sub.2 uptake, such as the initial air curing duration, the accelerated carbonation curing carbonation duration, the OPC mass replacement percentage by CCR, and the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete mix design.

(24) The mixing is grouped by the adopted accelerated carbonation curing process. In each group, one mix is made without CCR and served as a reference. Also, group 0a-0c is a benchmark group that does not undergo the accelerated carbonation curing and experienced a typical hydration reaction. The mixes are designated as Xa-Yc-Z CCR, where X represents the duration of initial air curing, Y denotes the duration of the accelerated carbonation curing, and Z is the OPC mass replacement percentage by the CCR. For instance, 20a-20c-5CCR entails a mix comprising 5% CCR replacement, by the OPC mass, and exposed to 20 hours of the initial air curing followed by 20 hours of the accelerated carbonation curing.

(25) The test matrix is designed to show the effect of the initial air curing duration, the accelerated carbonation curing duration, and the CCR replacement percentage on the performance of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete. In fact, the effect of the initial air curing duration is evaluated by comparing groups (1) 0a-4c, 4a-4c, and 20a-4c or (2) 0a-20c and 20a-20c. Meanwhile, to evaluate the influence of the accelerated carbonation curing duration, groups (1) 0a-0c, 0a-4c, and 0a-20c or (2) 20a-4c and 20a-20c are compared. Within each group, the CCR replacement percentage is varied by up to 10%, by the OPC mass, except in groups subjected to 20 hours of the accelerated carbonation curing (0a-20c and 20a-20c), where the CCR replacement percentage reached 20%, by the OPC mass.

(26) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the components of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes included ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) type I ordinary Portland cement (OPC), crushed limestone aggregates, tap water, and the CCR. The CCR is obtained in a slurry form. Prior to inclusion in the mix, it is dried and sieved through an ASTM #325 sieve (nominal particle size of 45 microns). Concrete mixes are designed, and it is based on the mixture proportions for a local CCR-OPC blended concrete blocks and bricks. A water-to-binder ratio (w/b) of 0.55 and a binder-to-aggregate ratio of 1:6 is selected for this process. The concrete mixtures included 0, 5, 10, or 20% CCR replacement, by the OPC mass.

(27) The dry ingredients are first mixed in a pan mixer for 2 minutes, followed by the gradual addition of water and further mixing for another 3 minutes Immediately after mixing, the fresh concrete is cast into 100-mm cubes and 100×200 mm (diameter×height) cylinders, vibrated on a vibration table for 10 seconds, and demolded. The demolded specimens are initially air cured in ambient conditions [relative humidity (RH) of 50±5% and temperature of 25±2° C.] and then carbonated for specific durations, as per shown in the test matrix of Table 1 (Refer to FIG. 2). The control group 0a-0c is placed in a sealed plastic bag until testing.

(28) FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic of the accelerated carbonation curing, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The accelerated carbonation curing is carried out in a sealable carbonation chamber 302 equipped with a safety valve 304. The carbonation chamber 302 is attached to a CO.sub.2 cylinder 308 with a purity of at least 95%. The CO.sub.2 cylinder 308 is equipped with a pressure regulator 306. The CO.sub.2 cylinder 308 and the carbonation chamber 302 is attached with a valve 312 that is further attached with a beaker. The beaker is filled with a lime water 310. Further, the pressure is set to 1 bar for all mixes. The temperature and relative humidity are not controlled and are in the ranges of 20-40° C. and 20-90%, respectively.

(29) The fluctuations in these two parameters are due to the exothermic nature of the accelerated carbonation curing reaction, which released heat and water from a plurality of concrete samples 314 into the sealed carbonation chamber 302. After the accelerated carbonation curing, the plurality of concrete sample 314 is sealed in a 12-plastic bag. There, they are sprayed with water regularly, i.e., every day for the first 7 days and every other day until the testing day, to compensate for the water lost during the air and the accelerated carbonation curing and promote a subsequent hydration reaction. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the effect of the CCR replacement and the accelerated carbonation curing on the performance of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is evaluated through the CO.sub.2 uptake, compressive strength, and volume of permeable voids. The CO.sub.2 uptake is determined by using a mass gain method as shown in equation 1. It is the change in the mass of a sample due to the accelerated carbonation curing while accounting for the water loss divided by the mass of cement (OPC).
CO.sub.2 uptake=[(Final mass−Initial mass+Water mass)/Cement mass]×100%   (1)

(30) The compressive strength test of concrete is performed after 28 days of the accelerated carbonation curing, as per BS EN-12390-3. The BS EN-12390-3 specifies a method for the determination of the compressive strength of test specimens of the CCR-OPC blended concrete. The average of three samples is considered. The volume of permeable voids test is also carried out at 28 days of age following ASTM C642. ASTM C642 is a standard test method for determinations of density, percent absorption, and percent voids in the CCR-OPC blended concrete.

(31) FIG. 4 is a graph that illustrates the CO.sub.2 uptake result, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The values ranged from 3.7 to 17.5% according to the cement (OPC) mass. Increasing the initial air curing duration from 0 to 4 hours (0a-4c and 4a-4c) increased the CO.sub.2 uptake by 78, 47, and 39% for mixes made with 0, 5, and 10% CCR, respectively. Similarly, the CO.sub.2 uptake is 165, 94, and 75% higher when the initial air curing duration increased from 0 to 20 hours (0a-4c and 20a-4c) for the same respective CCR replacement percentages.

(32) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the above data shows that prolonging the duration of initial air curing improved the degree of the accelerated carbonation curing. Such an increase in CO.sub.2 absorption is owed to the loss of free water during the initial air curing period, which allows for the penetration of CO.sub.2 deeper into the concrete. Nevertheless, using higher CCR replacement percentages decreased the rate of improvement. Apparently, initial air curing is less effective when more CCR is incorporated into the mix, as the carbonation efficiency of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete seemed to be less sensitive to its water content.

(33) Furthermore, for these mixes, the optimum CCR replacement for maximum carbon sequestration potential (i.e., highest CO.sub.2 uptake) is 5%, by the cement (OPC) mass. Indeed, mix 20a-4c-5CCR takes an uptake of 10.3%, by cement mass. Similarly, extending the initial air curing duration from 0 to 20 hours (0a-20c and 20a-20c) increased the CO.sub.2 uptake by 209, 162, and 169% for mixes having 0, 5, and 10% CCR replacement, respectively. Among the concrete mixes, 20a-20c-10CCR has the highest uptake of 17.5%, by cement mass. This shows that prolonged the air and the accelerated carbonation curing maximize the degree of the accelerated carbonation curing of the concrete with up to 10% CCR. The effect of extending the carbonation duration on the CO.sub.2 uptake is examined by comparing groups 20a-4c and 20a-20c.

(34) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, all the results show that increasing the carbonation duration from 4 to 20 hours increased the CO.sub.2 uptake by 48, 52, and 97% for mixes incorporating 0, 5, and 10% CCR, by cement mass, respectively. The improvement is due to more prolonged exposure of calcium-carrying compounds to CO.sub.2 gas, allowing more time for such compounds to react. On the other hand, replacing cement with CCR enhanced the degree of reaction, possibly owing to the more sensitive nature of the CCR to carbonation than cement.

(35) The findings indicated that the replacement of cement by CCR has an impact on CO.sub.2 uptake. Yet, the optimum quantity of CCR for maximum CO.sub.2 absorption varied depending on the accelerated carbonation curing. In fact, 5 and 10% CCR replacement rates are found to be optimal for concrete mixes that are carbonated for 4 and 20 hours, respectively, regardless of the initial air curing duration (i.e., 0, 4, or 20 hours). It seems that a longer carbonation curing duration of 20 hours is needed when more CCR is incorporated into the concrete mix. Nevertheless, increasing the CCR replacement to 20% (0a-20c-20CCR and 20a-20c-20CCR) led to a decrease in CO.sub.2 absorption.

(36) FIG. 5 is a graph that illustrates a total CO.sub.2 reduction of the CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The total CO.sub.2 reduction is the summation of the CO.sub.2 reduction due to OPC replacement by CCR and the CO.sub.2 uptake due to the accelerated carbonation curing of the fresh or semi-hardened CCR-OPC blended concrete. For each 1 kg of cement replaced, the carbon footprint is reduced by 0.95 kg. As such, the total CO.sub.2 reduction for each mix is calculated and presented in FIG. 5. Results show that without the accelerated carbonation curing, the decrease in the carbon footprint of concrete could reach 10%, which is owed to the replacement of OPC with 10% CCR, by mass.

(37) Meanwhile, the fresh or semi-hardened CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes treated with the accelerated carbonation curing regime within a 24-hour timeframe (0a-4c, 0a-20c, 4a-4c, and 20a-4c) have up to 26% lower carbon footprint than the hydrated control mix (0a-0c-0CCR). Extending the accelerated carbonation curing beyond 24 hours allowed for higher CO.sub.2 reductions. In fact, the highest CO.sub.2 reduction of 36.5% is associated with the mix having 20% CCR replacement and being subjected to 20 hours of initial air curing followed by 20 hours of the accelerated carbonation curing (20a-20c-20CCR). Although the increase in CCR replacement percentage from 10 to 20% reduced the CO.sub.2 absorption from 17.5 to 16.5%, respectively, the overall carbon savings increased from 27.5 to 36.5%. This shows that the accelerated carbonation curing of the fresh or semi-hardened CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes has the potential to alleviate the environmental footprint of the construction industry.

(38) FIG. 6 is a graph that illustrates the 1-day compressive strength of CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention. For the hydrated control mix (0a-0c-0CCR), the 1-day compressive strength is 13.1 MPa. After replacing 5 and 10% cement (OPC) with the CCR, the strength is 21.1 and 9.8 MPa, respectively. This shows that 5% CCR replacement in hydrated concrete improved its early-age mechanical strength.

(39) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the higher replacement rates are detrimental to such characteristics. Compared to the control mix (0a-0c-0CCR), the CCR-OPC blended concrete are carbonated for 4 hours after 0 and 4 hours of initial air curing (0a-4c and 4a-4c) suffered a loss in strength, possibly due to the evaporation of water during initial air curing which is needed for hydration. Conversely, the concrete mixes with longer initial air curing (20a-4c) or prolonged carbonation curing (0a-20c) have superior 1-day compressive strengths. Apparently, such conditions promoted the formation of carbonation and hydration products and increased the 1-day strength.

(40) Yet, this performance enhancement is valid for up to 10% CCR replacement only, the higher CCR replacement of 20% experienced a decrease in 1-day strength.

(41) FIG. 7 is a graph that illustrates the 28-day compressive strength of CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention. For the 28-day compressive strengths, the carbonated samples incorporating CCR have either equivalent or superior strength to the control mix (0a-0c-0CCR), except in mixes containing 20% CCR, where the strength decreased by up to 25%. Nevertheless, all concrete mixes could be utilized in the production of non-load-bearing concrete masonry units.

(42) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the effect of the initial air curing on the 1-day compressive strength of 4-hour carbonated CCR concrete is assessed (0a-4c, 4a-4c, and 20a-4c). Increasing the initial air curing duration from 0 to 4 and 20 hours led to respective increases in the 1-day strength of concrete made without CCR by 21 and 89%. Meanwhile, mixes having 5 and 10% CCR replacement noted increases of up to 91 and 42%, respectively. This shows that the positive effect of initial air curing on strength decreased with higher CCR replacement. Similarly, at 28 days, the compressive strength is increased as the extended initial air curing duration. With 20 hours of the initial air curing, 4-hour carbonated CCR concrete mixes made with 0, 5, and 10% CCR had 20, 13, and 4% higher 28-day compressive strength than those without air curing (0a-4c). Like the CO.sub.2 uptake, prolonged initial air curing has a less prominent effect on the compressive strength of concrete mixes with higher CCR replacement.

(43) The impact of prolonging the exposure of the CCR-OPC blended concrete to CO.sub.2 gas (i.e., longer carbonation durations) on the compressive strength is examined. Comparing groups 0a-4c and 0a-20c shows that extending the carbonation curing duration from 4 to 20 hours increased the 1-day compressive strength of mixes made with 0, 5, and 10% CCR by 63, 54, and 5%, respectively. This shows that prolonging carbonation curing is used to improve the compressive strength, albeit higher CCR replacement rates reduced the degree of enhancement. Such a finding is more pronounced at 28 days, where mixes have nearly equivalent 28-day compressive strength regardless of the duration of carbonation or CCR replacement percentage (except for 20% CCR replacement).

(44) Similar trends at 28 days were noted when comparing 20a-4c and 20a-20c mixes. In conclusion, the highest strengths are obtained upon replacement cement with 5% CCR. Yet, to maximize cement replacement in the concrete (i.e., reduce its carbon footprint) while maintaining or improving the 28-day compressive strength, the optimum CCR replacement percentage was 10%, by cement mass. Nevertheless, using a higher CCR replacement of 20% (to maximize the CO.sub.2 reduction) may still attain 28-day compressive strengths exceeding 20 MPa, which is sufficient for producing concrete blocks and bricks.

(45) FIG. 8 is a graph that illustrates the volume of permeable voids of CCR-OPC blended concrete mixes measured at an age of 28 days, in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The volume of permeable voids of the control group (0a-0c) made of 0, 5, and 10% CCR are 11.9, 9.7, and 12.4%, respectively. Similar to the 28-day compressive strength trend, replacing cement by 5% CCR improved the durability of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete by reducing the voids in the mix. Meanwhile, increasing the CCR replacement to 10% has an insignificant effect. Results also showed that the accelerated carbonation curing either maintained or reduced the volume of permeable voids, except in the cases of mixes with 20% CCR (0a-4c-20CCR and 20a-20c-20CCR), where it increased. Evidently, an increase in CCR replacement led to an increase in the volume of permeable voids, which is aligned with the decrease in compressive strength.

(46) FIG. 8 also shows that extending initial air curing from 0 to 4 and 20 hours prior to 4-hour carbonation decreased the volume of permeable voids of mixes without CCR by 11 and 46%, respectively. With CCR replacement of 5 and 10%, the voids decreased by up to 25 and 20%, respectively. This indicates that initial air curing has a positive impact on durability while noting that such enhancement diminishes as more cement is replaced by CCR. Such a finding is analogous to those of CO.sub.2 uptake and compressive strength. A similar trend is also noticed when comparing mixes 0a-20c and 20a-20c.

(47) As for the accelerated carbonation curing duration, prolonging the exposure of fresh concrete from 4 to 20 hours (0a-4c and 0a-20c) has an insignificant effect on the volume of permeable voids. Meanwhile, for mixes that are initially air cured for 20 hours, increasing the carbonation duration from 4 to 20 hours (20a-4c and 20a-20c) decreased the volume of permeable voids of mixes incorporating 0, 5, and 10% CCR by 11, 5, and 12%, respectively. Such a finding aligns with the increase in CO.sub.2 absorption and 28-day compressive strength. The volume of permeable voids is affected by the cement replacement with the CCR. Regardless of the durations of air and carbonation curing, the optimum quantity of the CCR for the lowest volume of permeable voids is 5%, by cement mass. This is in line with these mixes having the highest 28-day compressive strength. It seems that higher CCR replacement retarded the void-filling capabilities of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete, thereby increasing the volume of permeable voids and decreasing the compressive strength.

(48) FIG. 9 provides a schematic representation of a system 900 for a concrete production, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The system 900 includes a blending module 902, and a carbonation chamber 302 (Refer to FIG. 3). The blending module 902 mixes a calcium carbide residue (CCR) and an ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to produce a CCR-OPC blended concrete. The carbonation chamber 302 (Refer to FIG. 3) performs an accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete in its fresh or semi-hardened state. Further, the carbonation chamber 302 (Refer to FIG. 3) produces a carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete after the accelerated carbonation curing.

(49) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the CCR-OPC blended concrete is exposed to a carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) gas to promote a plurality of properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete. Further, the plurality of properties of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is a rapid strength gain, an enhanced durability, and a permanent sequester of the carbon dioxide gas.

(50) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the CCR is an industrial waste by product and is mainly composed of a calcium hydroxide Ca(OH).sub.2. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is replaced by up to 20% of the calcium carbide residue, by mass. Further, the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is obtained by mixing of a cementitious binder, an aggregate, and water. Further, the calcium carbide residue incorporation reduced an overall carbon footprint of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete is affected by a quantity of the CCR, an initial air curing duration, and an accelerated carbonation curing duration.

(51) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the incorporation of the CCR and the accelerated carbonation curing affect the performance of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete that is evaluated through a CO.sub.2 uptake, a compressive strength, and a volume of permeable voids.

(52) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the CO.sub.2 uptake is increased by extending the accelerated carbonation curing duration and prolonging the initial air curing duration of the CCR-OPC blended concrete.

(53) In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the compressive strength and the volume of permeable voids of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete are enhanced by replacing the OPC with the CCR, prolonging the accelerated carbonation curing duration, and increasing the initial air curing duration. In accordance with the present invention, concrete incorporating CCR may be used in construction applications to alleviate CO.sub.2 emissions associated with the industry. Concrete incorporating CCR can mitigate the adverse impact of CO.sub.2 emissions on the environment and incorporating CCR in concrete increases the efficiency of the carbonation reaction of concrete. Carbonation-cured concrete incorporating CCR has superior or equivalent mechanical and durability properties to hydrated counterparts and the total reduction in the carbon footprint of concrete increased due to the incorporation of CCR and carbonation curing of CCR-OPC blended concrete.

(54) In accordance with an advantageous embodiment of the present invention, the CCR is incorporated in the CCR-OPC blended concrete to enhance the carbon sequestration potential of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete, as the CCR is rich in the calcium hydroxide Ca(OH).sub.2 so it is positively impacted the performance of the concrete. Accordingly, the invention promotes the concept of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), decarbonizes the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete, and improves its mechanical and durability properties. In accordance with another advantageous embodiment of the present invention, the novel utilization of the CCR in the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is a more sustainable and eco-friendly concrete.

(55) In accordance with another advantageous embodiment of the present invention, the CCR is incorporated in the CCR-OPC blended concrete and is used in many construction applications to alleviate CO.sub.2 emissions associated with the industry. It easily mitigates the adverse impact of CO.sub.2 emissions on the environment. Further, it increases the efficiency of the carbonation reaction of the CCR-OPC blended concrete. The total reduction in the carbon footprint of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete is increased due to the incorporation of CCR and the accelerated carbonation curing of the CCR-OPC blended concrete.

(56) In accordance with another advantageous embodiment of the present invention, this invention may be used in many real-time applications that is anyone of a cement factory, concrete masonry block producer, and precast concrete plants. This invention helps in developing a market for carbon capture, utilization, and storage. The construction industry may be a beneficiary of a final product (the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete) of this invention. This invention may be adopted by various CO.sub.2-generating industries for direct and indirect CO.sub.2 capture to reduce their carbon footprint.

(57) In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the CCR content replacement may increase above 20% of the cement (OPC) mass. Using higher amounts of CCR may require modifying the mix design or adding supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to the concrete mix to provide good results. Changing the mix design may cause a variation in the porosity of the carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete, which influences the diffusivity of the CO.sub.2 gas, hence increasing the CO.sub.2 uptake. Since the initial air curing and the carbonation durations are in the ranges of 0-20 hours and 4-20 hours, respectively, longer duration (i.e., beyond 40 hours) may yield better results. Since in the present invention the carbonation curing pressure is set to 1 bar, increasing or lowering the pressures may yield different results.

(58) In accordance with the present invention, the usage of CCR in concrete as a blend/CCR as a partial replacement of OPC in concrete and exposing CCR-OPC blended concrete to accelerated carbonation for the storage of CO.sub.2, and the specific accelerated carbonation method includes incorporating solid CCR (i.e., powder form) in concrete as a cement replacement and exposing fresh or semi-hardened CCR-OPC blended concrete to CO.sub.2 gas in a carbonation chamber—the final product being carbonated CCR-OPC blended concrete. The primary aspects of the present invention include novel utilization of CCR in concrete which is exposed to accelerated carbonation curing. Carbonated concrete incorporating CCR being a more sustainable and eco-friendly concrete than counterparts made without CCR, concrete incorporating CCR having a higher CO.sub.2 uptake in comparison to concrete made without CCR, concrete incorporating CCR having enhanced mechanical properties than concrete made without CCR, and concrete incorporating CCR having superior durability performance in comparison with mixes made without CCR. The developed carbonation-cured CCR-OPC blended concrete may be used in precast construction applications to mitigate the adverse environmental impact of carbon emissions attributed to cement production while recycling calcium carbide residue and meeting construction performance requirements.

(59) It should be noted that the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments and that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described herein.

(60) Embodiments are described at least in part herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, systems, and computer program products and data structures according to embodiments of the disclosure. It will be understood that each block of the illustrations, and combinations of blocks, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the block or blocks.