Real-Time Output Correction of Detector Outputs Resulting from Azimuthal X-Ray Source Variations Using Monitoring Detectors

Abstract

A measurement compensation mechanism for an electronic radiation source-based borehole logging tool that compensates for geometric variations in the direction output of an x-ray source is provided, the measurement compensation system including: at least one electronic radiation source; at least one radiation shield; at least three reference detectors; and at least one borehole measuring radiation detector. A method of compensating the measurement of an electronic radiation source-based borehole logging tool that compensates for geometric variations in the direction output of an x-ray source is also provided, the method including at least: measuring an azimuthal distribution of radiation intensities equidistant from an electronic radiation source in order to correct a measured radiation value of a borehole-measuring radiation detector relative to the borehole-measuring radiation detector's azimuthal measurement direction.

Claims

1. A measurement compensation mechanism for an electronic radiation source-based borehole logging tool that compensates for geometric variations in a plurality of azimuthal distributions of radiation intensities of an x-ray source target, wherein said mechanism is configured to use resulting measurements from a plurality of measured azimuthal distributions of radiation intensities equidistant from an electronic radiation source to correct for geometric variations in the location of ion-beam; upon target anode of an electronic x-ray source target output intensity that affect a borehole-measuring radiation detector relative to said borehole-measuring radiation detector's azimuthal measurement direction; and wherein said mechanism further comprises at least one radiation shield configured to permit electronic x-ray radiation to emit in at least three azimuthal directions from the source target; at least three reference detectors aligned with said directions; and at least one borehole measuring radiation detector.

2. A method compensating the measurement mechanism for an electronic x-ray source based borehole logging tool that compensates for a plurality of geometric variations in an azimuthal distribution of radiation output intensities of an electronic x-ray source target, wherein said method uses at least three detectors to directly monitor the radiation field being produced from a source target to correct for the effect of geometric variations in the location of ion-beam impinging upon target anode of an electronic x-ray source target output intensity upon a borehole measuring radiation detector relative to said borehole-measuring radiation detector's azimuthal measurement direction.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising measuring the geometric variations in the azimuthal distribution of radiation intensities equidistant from an x-ray source.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0020] FIG. 1 illustrates the effect of ion-beam impingement position relative to a source-target upon the azimuthal distribution of source output radiation intensity, measured relative to the primary axis of a borehole tool housing.

[0021] FIG. 2 illustrates the effect upon the measured radiation outputs of an azimuthal distribution of reference detectors located around a source target.

[0022] FIG. 3 illustrates an example of an azimuthally distributed array of reference detectors disposed around a source-target which is configured to produce a conical beam through the use of radiation shielding within the tool but around said source-target.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

[0023] The methods and means described herein use the detected output of a plurality of azimuths of a non-isotope-based radiation source disposed tube within a borehole logging tool in order to determine accurate, constant corrections to be substituted during the computation of detector count-rate output prior to, or during, computation of the density of materials surrounding the tool.

[0024] In one example embodiment, an electronic-source-based borehole logging tool is deployed by wireline conveyance into a borehole, wherein the density of materials surrounding the borehole are measured by the tool. The tool is enclosed by a pressure housing that ensures well fluids are maintained outside of the housing.

[0025] With reference now to the attached figures, FIG. 1 illustrates the effect on the azimuthal variation of output radiation relative to the location of the ion-beam upon the target anode or cathode. A circularly formed ion-beam [101] impinges coaxially/concentrically upon a target [104] located within the housing of a borehole tool [108]. The resulting azimuthal distribution of output radiation [105] is also concentric relative to the tool housing [108] and source target position [104]. Consequently, any changes in the radiation intensity measured by any borehole-facing radiation detectors azimuthally distributed within the tool housing [108] are the direct result of changes in the properties of the materials surrounding the borehole. If the circularly formed ion-beam [102] impinges eccentrically upon a target [104] located within the housing of a borehole tool [108]. The resulting azimuthal distribution of output radiation [106] would be eccentric relative to the tool housing [108] and source target position [104]. Therefore, any changes in the radiation intensity measured by any borehole-facing radiation detectors azimuthally distributed within the tool housing [108] are biased by the non-uniform distribution of the output radiation [106], and are not the direct result of changes in the properties of the materials surrounding the borehole. Alternatively, when the circularly formed ion-beam [103] impinges eccentrically upon a target [104] located within the housing of a borehole tool [108] in another location upon the target, the resulting azimuthal distribution of output radiation [107] is eccentric relative to the tool housing [108] and source target position [104]. Accordingly, any changes in the radiation intensity measured by borehole-facing radiation detectors azimuthally distributed within the tool housing [108] are biased by the non-uniform distribution of the output radiation [107], and are not the direct result of changes in the properties of the materials surrounding the borehole. In all non-concentric target impingement conditions, it is difficult to determine whether the changes in detected radiation intensity are the result of borehole-material property changes (e.g., as a function of depth) or the result of variations in the ion-beam position upon the target. Depending upon the position the electron/ion beam impinges upon the surface of the target plane, the distribution of the radiation field around the tool will vary. Inconsistencies are therefore introduced into the detected count rates around the azimuth of the tool, and will detrimentally affect the accuracy of the computed density data if the geometrical variations are not accounted for.

[0026] With reference now to FIG. 2, a geometric distribution of at least three detectors is used to directly monitor the radiation field being produced from a source target. For example, FIG. 2 illustrates the use of five detectors azimuthally distributed around the source target.

[0027] In one embodiment, the ion-beam [201] impinges centrally/concentrically upon the target, wherein the summation of all monitoring detectors [204] outputs should be identical, and the outputs can be used to determine the variation in the overall source output, whereas the individual monitoring detector outputs can be used to determine the geometrical shift of the source-beam upon the target, and is further used to correct the borehole-measuring detector outputs for the variation in effective azimuthal source output as a function of source-beam position upon the target.

[0028] In another embodiment, the ion-beam [202, 203] impinges eccentrically upon the target, so that the monitoring detectors [205, 206] located radially closest to the ion-beam position detect more radiation than those that are located radially more distant. The circular distribution of the detected radiation intensities measured by the monitoring detectors [204, 205, 206] are used to compute and ascribe a radial (or circular) function that forms the basis of an azimuthally distributed array of correction factors. The array of correction factors is then used to correct the outputs of any borehole-measuring detectors within the tool relative to their azimuthal location. For example. if the detected location of the ion-beam [201, 202, 203] has shifted towards the tool housing [108] in a specific azimuthal direction, then it is anticipated that the source output in that direction will be elevated compared to all other azimuthal directions. As a result, any output for a borehole-measuring detector located in that azimuthal direction will be reduced relatively in order to compensate for the ion-beam-dependent locale source output elevation in that direction, and any other borehole-measuring detector located in other azimuthal directions reduced or increased accordingly with the computed azimuthal array of correction factors.

[0029] In another embodiment, the summation of all monitoring detectors [204, 205, 206] is used to measure variations in the overall output of the electronic radiation source.

[0030] In one embodiment a circular array of monitoring detectors [301] is coaxially located around the source tube located within the tool housing [108], and not directly in the radiation beam path of the source, rather located behind shielding [303] to reduce the possibility for saturation of the detectors by illumination by an amount of radiation outside of the operating specification of the detectors. The monitoring detectors [301] are being used to monitor the electronic and geometrical variations of a conically formed radiation beam within a conical collimation [302] formed by the conical surfaces of the radiation shielding [303] around the ion-source.

[0031] In one example embodiment, a number reference detectors comprising a scintillator crystal (such as Sodium Iodide, Cesium Iodide, or Lanthanum Bromide) or a direct-conversion crystal (such as Cadmium Telluride or Cadmium Zinc Telluride) with an embedded micro-isotope, used to stabilize detector gain, is located within the radiation shielding surrounding a source tube, each located in equally spaced azimuthal positions, thereby forming a radially symmetric arrangement around the radiation source.

[0032] In another embodiment, there are five reference detectors, all of which are located upon the same transverse plane, offset around 72 degrees from each other, while located upon the same coaxially located circumference around the radiation source emitter, but not necessarily upon the same transverse plane as the emitter.

[0033] In another embodiment, there are two reference detectors, all of which are located upon the same transverse plane, offset 120 degrees from each other, while located upon the same coaxially located circumference around the radiation source emitter but not necessarily upon the same transverse plane as the emitter.

[0034] In a further embodiment, a geometric distribution of the detectors [301] is used to monitor the radiation field being produced from source target. A summation of the monitoring detector outputs is used to determine the variation in the overall source output (intensity), whereas the individual monitoring detector outputs can be used to determine the geometrical shift of the source-beam upon the target and be further used to correct the casing/cement/formation detector outputs for the variation in effective azimuthal source output as a function of source-beam position upon the target. In this respect, the output of the detectors being used to measure casing, cement and formation (detecting counts from various depths of investigation) can be amended in real-time to correct for any geometric or electronic variations in the source beam distribution.

[0035] In another embodiment, the tool is located within a logging-while-drilling (LWD) string, rather than conveyed by wireline.

[0036] In another embodiment, the LWD provisioned tool is powered by mud turbines.

[0037] In another embodiment, the tool is combinable with other measurement tools such as neutron-porosity, natural gamma and/or array induction tools.

[0038] The foregoing specification is provided only for illustrative purposes, and is not intended to describe all possible aspects of the present invention. While the invention has herein been shown and described in detail with respect to several exemplary embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that minor changes to the description, and various other modifications, omissions and additions may also be made without departing from the spirit or scope thereof.