Digital predistortion for advanced antenna system
11451252 · 2022-09-20
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H03F3/189
ELECTRICITY
H03F3/68
ELECTRICITY
H03F1/3282
ELECTRICITY
H03F2201/3233
ELECTRICITY
H03F2203/21106
ELECTRICITY
H03F2201/3209
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H03F3/68
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
Systems and methods are disclosed herein that provide low-complexity Digital Predistortion (DPD) for a transceiver system that uses an Advanced Antenna System (AAS) to provide analog or hybrid beamforming.
Claims
1. A system comprising: a digital predistortion subsystem adapted to predistort a baseband transmit signal x(t) based on an adaptation model to thereby provide a predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t); and a beamforming front-end comprising: a plurality of transmit branches coupled to a plurality of transmit antenna elements, respectively, wherein the plurality of transmit branches is adapted to process the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) to transmit a plurality of radio frequency transmit signals x.sub.RF,1(t) through x.sub.RF,N(t) via the plurality of transmit antenna elements, respectively; and a receive branch coupled to a receive antenna element, the receive branch configured to receive a combined receive signal y(t) comprising the plurality of radio frequency transmit signals x.sub.RF,1(t) through x.sub.RF,N(t) transmitted via the plurality of transmit antenna elements and received via the receive antenna element; wherein the digital predistortion subsystem is further adapted to: process the combined receive signal y(t) based on at least a plurality of known coupling factors (C.sub.1,j through C.sub.N,j) between the plurality of transmit antenna elements and the receive antenna element, respectively, to thereby provide a normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t); and update the adaptation model based on a comparison of the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) and the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t).
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the receive branch comprises: a low-noise amplifier adapted to amplify the combined receive signal y(t); and attenuating circuitry adapted to attenuate the combined receive signal y(t) prior to amplification by the low-noise amplifier such that the low-noise amplifier operates in a linear mode.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein, in order to process the combined receive signal y(t) to thereby provide the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t), the digital predistortion subsystem is further adapted to: provide the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) in accordance with an equation expressed as:
4. The system of claim 3 wherein the plurality of gain adjustments (g.sub.1 through g.sub.N) is equal.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the digital predistortion subsystem is further adapted to: determine whether a measured Adjacent Channel Leakage-power Ratio, ACLR, is acceptable when using the adaptation model; update the adaptation model based on a comparison of the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) and the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) if the measured ACLR is not acceptable; and refrain from updating the adaptation model based on the comparison of the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) and the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) if the measured ACLR is acceptable.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein the beamforming front-end is adapted to form a single transmit beam with all of the plurality of transmit antenna elements and the plurality of transmit branches coupled to the plurality of transmit antenna elements.
7. A method for providing digital predistortion in a radio node utilizing an Advanced Antenna System, AAS, and including a plurality of antenna elements for beamforming, comprising: predistorting a baseband input signal x(t) based on an adaptation model to thereby provide a predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t); processing the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) to transmit a plurality of radio frequency transmit signals x.sub.RF,1(t) through x.sub.RF,N(t) via a plurality of transmit antenna elements, respectively; receiving a combined receive signal y(t) comprising the plurality of radio frequency transmit signals x.sub.RF,1(t) through x.sub.RF,N(t) transmitted via the plurality of transmit antenna elements and received via a receive antenna element; processing the combined receive signal y(t) based on at least a plurality of known coupling factors (C.sub.1,j through C.sub.N,j) between the plurality of transmit antenna elements and the receive antenna element, respectively, to thereby provide a normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t); and updating the adaptation model based on a comparison of the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) and the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t).
8. The method of claim 7 wherein receiving the combined receive signal y(t) comprises attenuating the combined receive signal y(t) prior to amplification by a low-noise amplifier such that the low-noise amplifier operates in a linear mode.
9. The method of claim 7 wherein processing the combined receive signal y(t) to thereby provide the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) comprises providing the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) in accordance with an equation expressed as:
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the plurality of gain adjustments (g.sub.1 through g.sub.N) is equal.
11. The method of claim 7 further comprising: determining whether a measured Adjacent Channel Leakage-power Ratio, ACLR, is acceptable when using the adaptation model; wherein: updating the adaptation model comprises updating the adaptation model based on a comparison of the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) and the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) if the measured ACLR is not acceptable; and the method further comprises refraining from updating the adaptation model based on the comparison of the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) and the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) if the measured ACLR is acceptable.
12. The method of claim 7 wherein a single transmit beam is formed with all of the plurality of transmit antenna elements and the plurality of transmit branches coupled to the plurality of transmit antenna elements.
13. A system for providing digital predistortion in a radio node utilizing an Advanced Antenna System, AAS, comprising a plurality of antenna elements to provide analog or hybrid beamforming, the system adapted to: predistort a baseband input signal x(t) based on an adaptation model to thereby provide a predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t); process the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) to transmit a plurality of radio frequency transmit signals x.sub.RF,1(t) through x.sub.RF,N(t) via a plurality of transmit antenna elements, respectively receive a combined receive signal y(t) comprising the plurality of radio frequency transmit signals x.sub.RF,1(t) through x.sub.RF,N(t) transmitted via the plurality of transmit antenna elements and received via the receive antenna element; receive a combined receive signal y(t) comprising the plurality of radio frequency transmit signals x.sub.RF,1(t) through x.sub.RF,N(t) transmitted via the plurality of transmit antenna elements and received via a receive antenna element; process the combined receive signal y(t) based on at least a plurality of known coupling factors (C.sub.1,j through C.sub.N,j) between the plurality of transmit antenna elements and the receive antenna element, respectively, to thereby provide a normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t); and update the adaptation model based on a comparison of the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) and the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t).
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(12) The embodiments set forth below represent information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
(13) Radio Node: As used herein, a “radio node” is either a radio access node or a wireless device.
(14) Radio Access Node: As used herein, a “radio access node” or “radio network node” is any node in a radio access network of a cellular communications network that operates to wirelessly transmit and/or receive signals. Some examples of a radio access node include, but are not limited to, a base station (e.g., a New Radio (NR) base station (gNB) in a Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Fifth Generation (5G) NR network or an enhanced or evolved Node B (eNB) in a 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) network), a high-power or macro base station, a low-power base station (e.g., a micro base station, a pico base station, a home eNB, or the like), and a relay node.
(15) Core Network Node: As used herein, a “core network node” is any type of node in a core network. Some examples of a core network node include, e.g., a Mobility Management Entity (MME), a Packet Data Network Gateway (P-GW), a Service Capability Exposure Function (SCEF), or the like.
(16) Wireless Device: As used herein, a “wireless device” is any type of device that has access to (i.e., is served by) a cellular communications network by wirelessly transmitting and/or receiving signals to a radio access node(s). Some examples of a wireless device include, but are not limited to, a User Equipment device (UE) in a 3GPP network and a Machine Type Communication (MTC) device.
(17) Network Node: As used herein, a “network node” is any node that is either part of the radio access network or the core network of a cellular communications network/system.
(18) Note that the description given herein focuses on a 3GPP cellular communications system and, as such, 3GPP terminology or terminology similar to 3GPP terminology is oftentimes used. However, the concepts disclosed herein are not limited to a 3GPP system.
(19) Note that, in the description herein, reference may be made to the term “cell;” however, particularly with respect to 5G NR concepts, beams may be used instead of cells and, as such, it is important to note that the concepts described herein are equally applicable to both cells and beams. Note that the embodiments disclosed herein relate to generating and using an adaptation model for predistortion for a single beam (i.e., for a single beam direction). The embodiments discussed herein can be extended to generate and use adaptation models for multiple beams.
(20) There is a need for a low complexity Digital Predistortion (DPD) system for a transceiver system (e.g., a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) transceiver) using an Advanced, or Active, Antenna System (AAS) having a multitude of active antenna branches (i.e., antenna elements coupled to active transmitter branches). This is achieved by embodiments described herein, and defined by the appended set of claims. The embodiments enable linearization of a multitude of power amplifiers in parallel transmitter branches coupled to corresponding antenna elements in the AAS using only one linearizer (e.g., only one DPD subsystem). In other words, the embodiments described herein enable the use of considerably less linearizers than the number of transmitter branches. The power amplifiers may all be different in their non-linear characteristics.
(21) A large advantage of embodiments described herein is the possibility to use, e.g., only one DPD subsystem (i.e., a single digital predistorter) for a whole antenna array coupled to multiple parallel transmitter branches each having its own amplifiers without the need to predistort the input signal of each amplifier separately. The advantage lies primarily in the reduction of the complexity of DPD for a radio node utilizing an AAS with multiple parallel transmitter branches having their own amplifiers that potentially have different non-linear characteristics.
(22) Embodiments described herein are related to DPD for a transceiver system (e.g., a MIMO transceiver) using an AAS having parallel transmitter branches. In particular, embodiments described herein relate to performing a single DPD (i.e., a single linearization) for multiple parallel transmitter branches. The transmitter branches include respective power amplifiers that may be more-or-less identical or may be different in their performance. Each transmitter branch is connected to a respective antenna element of the AAS and radiated to create a desired beam. Each transmitter branch may have its own phase and gain control. The number of digital baseband inputs to the DPD subsystem is one in the case of analog beamforming.
(23) Systems and methods are described herein for DPD for a transceiver system using an AAS having multiple parallel transmitter branches. In particular, the transmitter system provides analog or hybrid beamforming using the parallel transmitter branches, each coupled to a respective antenna element of the AAS. The antenna elements to which the transmitter branches are coupled are referred to herein as transmit antenna elements. In addition, the transceiver system includes a receiver, which is sometimes referred to herein as a measurement receiver or measurement receiver branch, coupled to an antenna element of the AAS, which is referred to herein as a receive antenna element. The measurement receiver branch is used to receive transmit signals transmitted via the transmitter branches for purposes of DPD adaptation. The measurement receiver branch could be a part of the same AAS transceiver as the transmitter branches or be an additional receiver added for purposes of measurement for DPD adaptation. The coupling between the receive antenna element and the different transmit antenna elements could be the same or different. However, the measurement receiver branch receives a combined signal from all of the transmitter branches subject to the coupling between the receive antenna element and the different transmit antenna elements.
(24) In some embodiments, DPD is performed using a Volterra series of the baseband transmit signal in digital baseband. Then, the Volterra series is predistorted using an inverse of an adaptation model. The adaptation model is a model of the combined non-linearity of the multiple parallel transmitter branches. The adaptation model is created and updated based on a comparison of the predistorted baseband transmit signal and a normalized version of the combined receive signal.
(25) In a calibrated AAS system, the phase and gain adjustment values of the different transmitter branches are readily available. This is because these values were previously obtained (e.g., computed or otherwise determined) to provide the desired beamforming. For example, the phase and gain value may be obtained from a Look Up Table (LUT).
(26) While the embodiments disclosed herein provide numerous advantages, some examples are as follows. At least some embodiments provide DPD for a transceiver system that uses an AAS using a single DPD subsystem (i.e., a single DPD hardware block). In other words, separate, parallel DPD subsystems are not needed for the parallel transmitter branches. The DPD suppresses Adjacent Channel Leakage-Power Ratio (ACLR). Further, embodiments of the present disclosure may be integrated with the analog or hybrid synthesis process and further enable dynamic beamforming. Still further, embodiments of the present disclosure enable DPD adaptation without the need for couplers between the outputs of the parallel transmitter branches and the measurement receiver branch.
(27) In this regard,
(28) The digital baseband processing system 12 is implemented in hardware or a combination of hardware and software. For instance, the digital baseband processing system 12 may be implemented using one or more processors (e.g., Central Processing Units (CPUs), Digital Signal Processors (DSPs), Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), and/or the like). Further, some or all of the functionality of the digital baseband processing system 12 may be implemented in software executed by the processor(s).
(29) The digital baseband processing system 12 includes a baseband signal processor 20, a DPD subsystem 22, and a database 24 or other data store (e.g., a LUT). In operation, the baseband signal processor 20 generates a baseband transmit signal x(t). The DPD subsystem 22 digitally predistorts the Volterra coefficients of the baseband transmit signal x(t) to provide a predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) based on an adaptation model (e.g., by multiplying the baseband transmit signal by the inverse of the adaptation model). The adaptation model is a model of the (combined) non-linearity of the transmitter branch(es) of the analog beamforming front-end 14. The predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) is provided to the analog beamforming front-end 14 for transmission via the transmit antenna element 16-1 or transmit antenna elements 16-1 through 16-N, depending on the particular embodiment. The transmitted signal(s) is(are) received at the receive antenna element 18 and processed by the analog beamforming front-end 14 to provide a (combined) baseband receive signal y(t). As discussed below in detail, the DPD subsystem 22 post-processes the (combined) baseband receive signal y(t) to account for the gain and phase adjustments in the transmitter branch(es) of the analog beamforming front-end 14 as well as the coupling factor(s) between the transmit antenna element(s) 16 and the receive antenna element 18 to thereby provide a normalized baseband receive signal. The DPD subsystem 22 compares Volterra coefficients of the normalized baseband receive signal (referred to herein as y.sub.pp(t)) to the corresponding predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) to create or update the adaptation model. In general, the adaptation model is generated to reduce (e.g., minimize) the error between the normalized baseband receive signal to the corresponding predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t). In this manner, a single DPD is performed to provide linearization of multiple parallel transmitter branches of the analog beamforming front-end 14.
(30) The transceiver system 10 provides a DPD solution for the AAS (i.e., for a multi-antenna system). This DPD solution is for an analog beamforming AAS; therefore, there is only one main beam direction using all of the transmitter branches of the analog beamforming front-end 14. In an analog beamforming AAS, the expected power amplifier behavior is identical across the multiple transmitter branches of the analog beamforming front-end 14. However, in actual implementation, there is always spread (i.e., there are always differences between the behavior and, in particular, the non-linearity of the power amplifiers). Additionally, for beam forming, the output power of individual power amplifiers may vary, which means that not all power amplifiers are operating in the same linear region. Here, the DPD subsystem 22 performs a single DPD based on an adaptation model that is configured to compensate for the different non-linear characteristics of the multiple transmit branches of the analog beamforming front-end 14.
(31) As discussed below in detail, the DPD subsystem 22 creates and updates the adaptation model based on the (combined) receive signal y(t), where the (combined) receive signal y(t) is obtained using a measurement receiver branch within the analog beamforming front-end 14 and a corresponding receive antenna element 18 of the AAS. In this manner, there is no need for a coupler (i.e., for coupler circuitry) to couple the output(s) of the transmitter branch(es) to the input of the measurement receiver branch. When multiple transmitter branches are active, the combined receive signal y(t) is a combination of all of the transmitted signals including corresponding gain, phase, and coupling variations. The gain and phase adjustments of the transmit branches are known and stored in the database 24. Likewise, the coupling factors C.sub.ij (for i=1 . . . N) between the transmit antenna elements 16 and the receive antenna element 18 (represented by index j) are also known and stored in the database 24. The coupling factors C.sub.ij may be determined, e.g., using any suitable antenna calibration procedure.
(32) In order to generate the adaptation model used by the DPD subsystem 22 for predistortion, either one transmitter branch or multiple transmitter branches can be used, depending on the particular embodiment. The details of these embodiments are described below.
(33)
(34) In addition, the (combined) receive signal y(t) is fed back to the post-processing function 32 from the analog beamforming front-end 14. The expected combined linear signal y(t) to be received can be expressed as:
y(t)=x(t)Σ.sub.i=1.sup.N(g.sub.ie.sup.jφ.sup.
where g.sub.i is a gain adjustment applied by the i-th transmitter branch, φ.sub.i is a phase adjustment applied by the i-th transmitter branch, and C.sub.i is a coupling factor for the coupling between the i-th transmit antenna element (which is coupled to the output of the i-th transmitter branch) and the receive antenna element (which is coupled to the input of the measurement receiver branch). Note that error/noise is considered as being part of the non-linearity. Further, in some scenarios or implementations, the gain adjustments g.sub.i may be the same for all of the transmitter branches. For a single transmitter branch, Equation (1) reduces to:
y(t)=x(t)g.sub.ie.sup.jφ.sup.
(35) The post-processing function 32 processes the combined receive signal y(t) to effectively remove the combined effects of the gain adjustments g.sub.i and phase adjustments φ.sub.i of the transmitter branches and the coupling factors C.sub.i between the transmit antenna elements 16 and the receive antenna element 18. Specifically, the post-processing function 32 computes a normalized, or post-processed, receive signal as:
(36)
(37) The second Volterra series coefficient generator 34 generates a Volterra series, represented as Volterra coefficients, for the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t). The adaptation model generator 30 then updates the adaptation model as follows:
(38)
where h.sub.q is the updated adaptation model, h.sub.q-1 is the previous adaptation model, [X] is the set of Volterra coefficients representing the baseband transmit signal x(t), and [Y.sub.pp] is the set of Volterra coefficients representing the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t).
(39) As discussed above, in some embodiments, only one transmitter branch is used to generate the adaptation model used by the DPD subsystem 22 for predistortion. Here, it is assumed that the non-linearity of all of the transmitter branches is identical or that any differences are negligible. As such, the adaptation model can be created and updated using only one transmitter branch and one transmit antenna element. In this regard,
(40)
(41) In this example, the DPD subsystem 22 measures ACLR of the received signal y(t) or, alternatively, the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) (step 112) and determines whether the measured ACLR is acceptable (i.e., whether the measured ACLR is at or below a defined acceptable ACLR level) (step 114). The acceptable ACLR level may be defined by, e.g., a regulation promulgated by a regulatory agency and may vary from one country or region to another. If the measured ACLR is not at an acceptable level (step 114, NO), the DPD subsystem 22 generates, or updates, the adaptation model based on a comparison of the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) and the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t), as discussed above (step 116). The process then returns to step 104 and is repeated. Once the ACLR is at an acceptable level (step 114, YES), further updating of the adaptation model ceases, and, in this example, the digital baseband processing system 12 activates all transmitter branches and corresponding transmit antenna elements 16, deactivates the receive antenna element 18 and the measurement receiver branch 38, and begins operating in a normal transmission mode of operation (steps 118 through 122).
(42) As discussed above, in some embodiments, only one transmitter branch is used to generate the adaptation model used by the DPD subsystem 22 for predistortion. In this regard,
(43) As illustrated, splitter circuitry 50 operates to provide the same predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) to each of the transmitter branches 36-1 through 36-N. The transmitter branches 36-1 through 36-N include phase adjusters 40-1 through 40-N that apply the phase adjustments φ.sub.1 through φ.sub.N for the transmitter branches 36-1 through 36-N, respectively, and PAs 42-1 through 42-N that apply gain adjustments g.sub.1 through g.sub.N for the transmitter branches 36-1 through 36-N, respectively. As discussed above, the measurement receiver branch 38 includes the LNA 44 and the phase adjuster 46 and, optionally, the attenuator 48. While not illustrated for clarity and ease of discussion, as one of skill in the art will readily appreciate, the transmitter branches 36-1 through 36-N and the measurement receiver branch 38 also include various components used for transmission and reception (e.g., upconverters for upconverting to radio frequency, downconverters for downconverting from radio frequency to baseband, filters, etc.). In operation, the transmitter branches 36-1 through 36-N process the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) to provide respective radio frequency transmit signals x.sub.RF,1(t) through x.sub.RF,N(t).
(44)
(45) In this example, the DPD subsystem 22 measures ACLR of the received signal y(t) or, alternatively, the normalized received signal y.sub.pp(t) (step 212) and determines whether the measured ACLR is acceptable (i.e., whether the measured ACLR is at or below a defined acceptable ACLR level) (step 214). The acceptable ACLR level may be defined by, e.g., a regulation promulgated by a regulatory agency and may vary from one country or region to another. If the measured ACLR is not at an acceptable level (step 214, NO), the DPD subsystem 22 generates, or updates, the adaptation model based on a comparison of the predistorted baseband transmit signal x′(t) and the normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t), as discussed above (step 216). The process then returns to step 204 and is repeated. Once the ACLR is at an acceptable level (step 214, YES), further updating of the adaptation model ceases, and, in this example, the digital baseband processing system 12 deactivates the receive antenna element 18 and the measurement receiver branch 38 and the process ends (steps 218 and 220).
(46)
(47) Next, the post-processing function 32 calculates a linear effect for the i-th transmit antenna element 16-i (step 310). The linear effect w(i) for the i-th transmit antenna element 16-i (i.e., the linear effect w(i) of the i-th transmit branch 36-i) is computed as:
w(i)=g.sub.ie.sup.jφ.sup.
Note that this weight factor is different for different beam settings (e.g., for different beam directions). The post-processing function 32 then computes a complete effect rx(i) of the i-th antenna element 16-i including the linear effect w(i) and the coupling factor C.sub.i between the i-th transmit antenna element 16-i and the receive antenna element 18, which in this example is denoted as the j-th antenna element such that the coupling factor C.sub.i is denoted as (step 312). The complete effect rx(i) of the i-th transmit antenna element 16-i is computed as:
rx(i)=w(i)C.sub.ij. (6)
Note that the coupling factor C.sub.ij can vary with temperature even for the same pair of antenna elements i and j, which leads to different values of the complete effect rx(i). However, all of this information is available in the database 24. The process then returns to step 302 and is repeated until the complete effect rx(i) is computed for each of the transmit antenna elements 16-1 through 16-N.
(48) Once the complete effect rx(i) is computed for each of the transmit antenna elements 16-1 through 16-N, the post-processing function 32 sums all of the complete effects rx(i) (for i=1 . . . N) to extract, or determine, a post-processing or normalization factor pp that represents the combined, complete effect for all of the transmit antenna elements 16-1 through 16-N (which can likewise be referred to as the combined, complete effect for all of the transmit branches 36-1 through 36-N) (step 314). The post-processing factor pp is computed as:
pp=Σ.sub.i=1.sup.Nrx(i). (7)
The post-processing function 32 then computes the normalized baseband receive signal y.sub.pp(t) (step 316). The normalized receive signal y.sub.pp(t) is computed as:
(49)
Equation (8) is equivalent to Equation (3) above. Once the normalized baseband receive signal y.sub.pp(t) is computed, the DPD subsystem 22 uses the normalized baseband receive signal y.sub.pp(t) to generate or update the adaptation model used for predistortion, as described above.
(50)
(51)
(52) As illustrated in
(53) As for the analog beamforming front-end 14, some additional components not illustrated in
(54) The operation of the transceiver system 10 of
(55)
(56) The following acronyms are used throughout this disclosure. 3GPP Third Generation Partnership Project 5G Fifth Generation AAS Advanced Antenna System ACLR Adjacent Channel Leakage-Power Ratio ADC Analog-to-Digital Converter AGC Adaptive Gain Control ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit CPU Central Processing Unit DAC Digital-to-Analog Converter dB Decibel DPD Digital Predistortion DSP Digital Signal Processor eNB Enhanced or Evolved Node B FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array gNB New Radio Base Station LNA Low Noise Amplifier LTE Long Term Evolution LUT Look Up Table MIMO Multiple Input Multiple Output MME Mobility Management Entity MTC Machine Type Communication NR New Radio P1 dB 1 Decibel Compression Point P-GW Packet Data Network Gateway SCEF Service Capability Exposure Function SIMO Single Input Multiple Output SISO Single Input Single Output UE User Equipment
(57) Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.