A METHOD FOR FOOD PACKAGE ASSESSMENT, AND A SYSTEM THEREOF

Abstract

A method for food package assessment, said method comprising determining an identity associated to a device linked to an operator to perform one or several tasks related to the food package assessment, transmitting instructions related to the food package assessment to the device associated with the identity, receiving measurements from the device in response to the instructions, and determining food package assessment data based on the measurements.

Claims

1. A method for food package assessment, said method comprising: determining an identity associated with a device linked to an operator to perform at least one task related to the food package assessment, transmitting instructions related to the food package assessment to the device associated with the identity, receiving measurements from the device in response to the instructions, and determining food package assessment data based on the measurements.

2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: determining locations associated with a plurality of devices associated with a plurality of identities, and determining an instructions-associated location linked to the instructions, wherein determining the identity linked to the operator identified to perform the at least one task related to the food package assessment comprises identifying the device associated with the identity having a location closest to the instructions-associated location.

3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: receiving a package identity together with the measurements, wherein the package identity is determined by the device.

4. The method according to claim 3, further comprising: determining a package location by using the device, receiving the package location together with the measurements, determining further instructions based on the measurements, determining a further identity linked to a further operator based on the package location, transmitting the further instructions to the further operator, and receiving further measurements from the further operator, wherein the food package assessment is based on the measurements and the further measurements.

5. The method according to claim 4, further comprising receiving conditions for surroundings based on the package location.

6. The method according to claim 4, wherein determining the package location comprises: scanning a package associated with the package identity by using the device, determining a device location for the device during scanning the package, and setting the package location to the device location.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the food package assessment comprises incubation of packages.

8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: comparing the measurements from the device linked to the identity with other measurements from other devices linked to other identities, and responsive to deviations being found, transmitting a notification to the device linked to the identity.

9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: analyzing the food package assessment data to identify a food safety risk, and responsive to identifying the food safety risk: transmitting a recall request, and/or stopping food production.

10. A system for food package assessment, said system comprising: a plurality of devices associated with identities and linked to operators, and a server configured to: determine an identity among the identities, linked to an operator identified to perform at least one task related to the food package assessment, transmit instructions related to the food package assessment to a device associated with the identity, receive measurements from the device in response to the instructions, and determine food package assessment data based on the measurements.

11. The system according to claim 10, wherein the server is further configured to determine locations associated with a plurality of devices associated with a plurality of identities, determine an instructions-associated location linked to the instructions, and identify the device associated with the identity having a location closest to the instructions-associated location.

12. The system according to claim 10, wherein: the server is further configured to receive a package identity together with the measurements, and the plurality of devices are configured to determine the package identity.

13. The system according to claim 10, wherein the server is further configured to receive a package identity and a package location together with the measurements, and wherein the plurality of devices are configured to determine the package identity and the package location.

14. The system according to claim 13, wherein the server is further configured to receive conditions for surroundings together with the measurements, and wherein the plurality of devices are further configured to receive conditions for surroundings.

15. The system according to claim 11, wherein the plurality of devices are further configured to scan a package associated with the package identity, determine a device location while scanning the package, and set the package location to the device location.

16. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: analyzing the food package assessment data to identify a food safety risk, and responsive to identifying the food safety risk: stopping a food packaging machine, thereby stopping food production.

17. The system according to claim 10, wherein the server is further configured to: analyze the food package assessment data to identify a food safety risk, and responsive to identifying the food safety risk: stopping a food packaging machine, thereby stopping food production.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0022] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings, in which

[0023] FIG. 1 is a known system for assessing food package integrity.

[0024] FIG. 2 is a system according to the invention.

[0025] FIGS. 3a and 3b is a flowchart illustrating a method for food package assessment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0026] With reference to FIG. 1, a known system 100 for assessing food package integrity is illustrated. The known system 100 comprises a reel of packaging material 102 and a pipe 104 providing packaging material and food product, respectively, to a filling machine 106, also known as a packaging machine. In the particular example illustrated in FIG. 1, the packaging material is a carton-based packaging material and the filling machine 106 is a roll-fed filling machine. Other variants are blanks-fed filling machines or PET bottling machines.

[0027] The filling machine 106 is producing packages 108 filled with the food product, such as milk. After being produced, the packages 108 can be further handled by downstream equipment, such as card board packers, film wrappers, straw applicators, palletizers, etc. In the particular example illustrated, the packages 108 are fed to a palletizer 110 that is loading the packages onto a pallet 112.

[0028] Overall, pieces of equipment involved in packaging the food product, in this particular example the filling machine 106 and the palletizer 110, may be referred to as a packaging line 114.

[0029] To assess package integrity, i.e. that the packages 108 are closed such that no unwanted microorganisms or other external factors may spoil the food product, a sample package 116 may be captured from the packages 108 by an operator 118. After having received the sample package 116, the operator 118 performs a number of measurements on the sample package 116 and enters information into a computer 120. The computer 120 may be a stand-alone computer, but it may also be connected to other computers via a cloud service 122. In case the operator 118 finds that the sample package 116 does not meet pre-set quality conditions, the operator 118 may request that further actions are taken.

[0030] FIG. 2 illustrates a system 200 according to the present invention. As the known system 100 illustrated in FIG. 1, the system 200 comprises the packaging line 114 comprising the reel 102, the pipe 104, the filling machine 106, the packages 108, the palletizer and the pallet 112.

[0031] However, unlike the known system 100, the system 200 comprises a plurality of operators 202a, 202b, 202c, each having a device 204a, 204b, 204c, such as a mobile phone or tablet, communicatively connected to a server 206. Having such a set-up it is made possible to send instructions 208a, 208b,208c to the devices 204a, 204b, 204c from the server 206 whenever needed. Thus, instead of having a passive approach that is based on that the operator 118, as illustrated in FIG. 1, follows a scheme provided to him or her, the system 200 provides the possibility for an active approach in which the instructions 208a, 208b, 208c are provided to the operators 202a, 202b, 202c.

[0032] After having transmitted the instructions 208a, 208b, 208c, which may be provided to one or several of the operators 202a, 202b, 202c, the operators capture sample packages 210a, 210b, 210c and perform tasks assigned in the instructions 208a, 208b, 208c. Where to pick the sample packages 210a, 210b, 210c may be included in the instructions. Measurements 212a, 212b, 212c made on the sample packages 210a, 210b, 210c can be transferred from the devices 204a, 204b, 204c to the server 206.

[0033] The measurements 212a, 212b, 212c can be processed by the server 206 itself or by a cloud service 214, or a combination thereof. Optionally, additional data may be received from another cloud service 216 associated with another packaging line such that the measurements can be assessed more reliably. In a similar manner, data may be transmitted from the cloud service 214 associated to the server 206 to the other cloud service 216.

[0034] An output from the processing of the measurements is food packaging assessment data 216. This data may be a Boolean indicating only whether or not the packages 210a, 210b, 210c provide sufficient integrity or not, or it may contain more detailed data such that e.g. a root cause for insufficient integrity can be identified.

[0035] The devices 204a, 204b, 204c may be associated with identities 220a, 220b, 220c. In case the devices are mobile phones or tablets, the identities may be MAC addresses, but the identities may also be made specifically for this purpose. An advantage with having identities for the devices is that, if a specific operator is associated to a specific device, operator-specific deviations in measurements can be identified. As an effect, if it can be identified that the specific operator is not performing the measurements correctly, this can be identified and training may be provided such that in turn a reliability of the measurements can be improved.

[0036] Further, the devices 204a, 204b, 204c may be provided with cameras such that optical marks, such as QR codes, provided on the packages can be scanned. Since the optical marks may contain package identity information, it is possible not only to identify the operator performing the tasks resulting in the measurements, but also a package identity of the package being measured. The package identity 222a, 222b, 22c may be transmitted from the device together with the measurements. By knowing the package identity, the server 206 may capture additional information in the form of e.g. parameter settings used in the filling machine 106 when producing the package, which in turn provides for that an improved analysis of the measurements can be made.

[0037] Still further, the devices 204a, 204b, 204c may GPS-enabled or in any other way provided with means for determining their positions. By having the positions of the devices, it is possible to also determine where the measurements take place since the devices are used for performing the measurements. This especially holds true if the devices are used for scanning the packages to determine the package identities. In this way also the package location 222a, 222b, 222c may be transmitted together with the measurements.

[0038] Another effect of having position information for the devices 204a, 204b, 204c is that the instructions may be sent to an operator being close to a location from which the packages are to be captured. For instance, if it can be determined that the operator is close to the palletizer 110 and the package to be measured is to be captured from the palletizer, the instructions may be sent to this operator.

[0039] Having the positions of the devices 204a, 204b, 204c also provides for that conditions for the surroundings 222a, 222b, 222c can be identified and transmitted together with the measurements. The conditions may be captured by having sensors, such as temperature sensors and humidity sensors, incorporated in the devices, but it is also possible for the devices 204a, 204b, 204c to indirectly determine the conditions by sending a request for the conditions together with the position data to external sensors, and receiving the conditions from the external sensors. The external sensors may e.g. be temperature sensors and/or humidity sensors provided in a facility housing the packaging line 114.

[0040] Identifying the conditions for the surroundings may be of relevance since temperature and/or humidity may affect the measurements, and the conditions for the surroundings may vary in different parts of the facility housing the packaging line. For instance, the packaging line 114 may be arranged such that the pipe 104 and the reel 102 is placed in a cold section, e.g. below 10 degrees Celsius, of the facility and the palletizer 110 is placed in a warm section, above 10 degrees Celsius, of the facility.

[0041] Even though illustrated that the package identity, the package location and the conditions for the surroundings are grouped, it should be understood that these can be handled separately as well.

[0042] As illustrated in FIG. 2, the sample packages 110a, 110b, 110c may not only be captured from the packaging line 114, but also from an incubator 224. By holding the sample packages for a pre-determined period of time under controlled conditions, reliable assessment of the package integrity can be made. Further, even though not illustrated, the sample packages may be captured from a ware house, placed at a different location than the packaging line, or in a food store, also placed elsewhere.

[0043] An advantage with the approach described above is that the assessment of packages can be made quicker, which provides for that food safety risks can be identified quicker, which in turn further reduces a risk that food product not safe to consume reaches consumers and also that the food production can be stopped such that a number of wasted packages can be reduced.

[0044] Still an advantage is that the assessment may be dynamic. For instance, in case a certain measurement is received it may be pre-programmed in the server 206 which instructions to transmit as a next step. The dynamic approach comes especially handy when being combined with several devices placed in different locations. For instance, in case the sample package held in the incubator 224 indicates that there may be a food safety risk, instructions may be sent to an operator placed in the ware house, placed in a different location, to perform measurements on packages kept in the ware house and coming from the same batch as the sample package held in the incubator.

[0045] Although indicated above that each operator is associated to a device this does not have to be the case. There may be a group of operators using the same device or the devices may be shared among all the operators.

[0046] FIGS. 3a and 3b is a flowchart 300 illustrating a method for food package assessment.

[0047] In a first step 302 an identity associated to the device 204a, 204b, 204c can be identified.

[0048] In a second step 304, the instructions 208a, 208b, 208c can be transmitted to the device.

[0049] In a third step 306, the measurements 212a, 212b, 212c from the device can be received.

[0050] In a fourth step 308, the food package assessment data 218 can be determined.

[0051] In a fifth step 310, locations associated to a plurality of devices may be determined. In a sixth step 312, an instructions-associated location may be determined. In a seventh step 314, that may be part of the first step 302, a device having a location closest to the instructions-associated location may be identified. In other words, if the instructions are to be performed in a specific location, the device closest to this specific location may be identified and instructions may be transmitted to this device.

[0052] In an eighth step 316, a package identity may be received together with the measurements.

[0053] In a ninth step 318, a package location may be determined by the device.

[0054] In a tenth step 320, the package location may be received together with the measurements.

[0055] In an eleventh step 322, further instructions may be determined based on the measurements.

[0056] In a twelfth step 324, a further identity linked to a further operator may be determined based on the package location,

[0057] In a thirteenth step 326, the further instructions may be transmitted to the further operator.

[0058] In a fourteenth step 328, further measurements may be received from the further operator.

[0059] In a fifteenth step 330, conditions for surroundings determined based on the package location may be received.

[0060] The ninth step 318 may comprise a first sub-step 332 of scanning the package with the device, a second sub-step 334 of determining the device location during the step of scanning, and a third sub-step 336 of setting the package location to the device location.

[0061] In a sixteenth step 338, the measurements from the device linked to the identity can be compared with other measurements from other devices linked to other identities. If deviations are found 340, in a seventeenth step 342 a notification to the device linked to the identity may be transmitted.

[0062] In an eighteenth step 344, the food package assessment data 218 can be analyzed to identify a food safety risk. If the food safety risk is identified 346, in a nineteenth step 348 a recall request can be transmitted, and/or, in a twentieth step 350 the food production can be stopped.

[0063] Even though illustrated and described in a certain order it should be understood that the steps can be made in other orders as well.

[0064] From the description above follows that, although various embodiments of the invention have been described and shown, the invention is not restricted thereto, but may also be embodied in other ways within the scope of the subject-matter defined in the following claims.