PROCESS OF DISPOSAL IN PILES OF TAILINGS STEMMING FROM THE IRON ORE PROCESSING METHOD
20220258180 · 2022-08-18
Inventors
Cpc classification
Y02W30/52
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B09B3/70
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B03D1/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D2221/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B09B3/70
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The present invention discloses a process of disposal of tailings in piles stemming from the iron ore processing method, replacing dams, and comprising the steps of thickening the ultra-fine tailings, thickening the sandy tailings, mixing the tailings in the proportion of 80 to 90% by weight of sandy tailings and 10 to 20% by weight of ultra-fine tailings, addition of coagulant, addition of flocculant, filtering the mixture and piling the filtered tailings. Unlike traditional processes, this invention promotes an economically and technically feasible tailing disposal process that can be added to any conventional iron ore concentration plant without the need for any change in the process flowchart.
Claims
1. Process of disposal in tailings piles stemming from the iron ore processing method comprising the following steps: a. thickening the ultra-fine tailings in a thickener; b. thickening the sandy tailings in a thickener; c. mixing the sandy tailings with the ultra-fine tailings and adding coagulant for the pre-treatment 1 of the tailings mixture; d. performing the pre-treatment 2 of the tailings mixture with the addition of a flocculant agent; e. filtering the tailings mixture; f. piling of the filtered tailings.
2. Process of disposal in piles, according to claim 1, wherein step a) comprises a high-density thickener (HD—High Density).
3. Process of disposal in piles, according to claim 1, wherein step b) comprises a conventional type of thickener.
4. Process of disposal in piles, according to claim 1, wherein step c) comprises mixing the tailings in the proportion of 80 to 90% by weight of sandy tailings and 10 to 20% by weight of ultra-fine tailings.
5. Process of disposal in piles, according to claim 1, wherein step c) comprises the addition of coagulant in the proportion of 100 to 130 g/t (grams of coagulant per ton of tailing mixture).
6. Process of disposal in piles, according to claim 1, wherein step d) comprises the addition of flocculant in the proportion of 15 to 30 g/t (grams of coagulant per ton of tailing mixture).
7. Process of disposal in piles, according to claim 1, wherein step e) comprises a filtering process performed in a vertical vacuum disc filter.
8. Process of disposal in piles, according to claim 1, wherein step e) comprises a filtering that results in a moisture content of the final filtered cake from 10 to 18%.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0034] The present invention is described in detail based on the respective figures:
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0048] Although the present invention may be susceptible to different embodiments, preferred embodiments are shown in the drawings and in the following detailed discussion, with the understanding that the present description is to be considered an example of the principles of the invention and that it is not meant to limit the present invention to what was illustrated and described herein.
[0049] Unless otherwise noted, all parts and percentages are indicated by weight.
[0050] The main approach of the present invention is related to a process of disposal in piles of tailings stemming from the iron ore processing method, comprising the following steps: [0051] A. thickening the ultra-fine tailings with a high-density thickener (HD—High Density); [0052] B. thickening the sandy tailings with a conventional thickener; [0053] C. mixing the tailings in the proportion of 80 to 90% by weight of sandy tailings and 10 to 20% by weight of ultra-fine tailings and adding the coagulant for the pre-treatment 1 of the tailings mixture; [0054] D. performing the pre-treatment 2 of the tailings mixture with the addition of a flocculant agent; [0055] E. filtering the tailings mixture in a vertical vacuum disc filter; [0056] F. piling the filtered tailings mixture.
[0057] The iron ore concentration process that is most used by the mining industry consists of flotation. The use of this process requires previous desliming steps, which consist of removing the ultra-fine ore, which impairs the efficiency of the concentration process.
[0058] In general, the desliming of this ore is carried out using equipment such as hydrocyclones. As presented by
[0059] The present invention uses ultra-fine tailings from the desliming process and sandy tailings from the flotation process as starting material. The tailings are thickened, mixed, treated, filtered and piled, as represented in
[0060] The ultra-fine tailings from desliming basically comprise gangue minerals, particularly quartz and kaolinite, and iron minerals. Typically, the ultra-fine tailings have about 60% particles smaller than 10 μm and 20% smaller than 3 μm, in addition to a maximum particle size (top size) of nearly 45 μm.
[0061] The sandy tailings from the flotation basically consist of quartz and hematite minerals. Typically, the sandy tailings have about 90% particles smaller than 150 μm, 50% smaller than 75 μm, 30% smaller than 45 μm and only 5% particles smaller than 10 μm.
[0062] As represented by the flowchart in
[0063] The use of conventional processes to dewater ultra-fine tailings presents serious operational problems, mainly with regard to its efficiency. For this reason, special thickening equipment is recommended, such as the high-density thickener (HD—High Density).
[0064] The high-density thickener has the capacity of processing material with a solid mass concentration between 20% to 45% and obtaining a denser underflow, with 35 to 55% solid mass concentration, for afterwards mixing it with sandy tailings. Preferably, the percentage of solids after thickening the ultra-fine tailings is from 45 to 55%.
[0065] The high-density thickener (HD—High Density) is characterized by having a lateral height equal to or greater than 6 meters, a smaller area compared to conventional thickeners and by promoting greater thickening of the underflow.
[0066] The second step in the process of the present invention consists of thickening the sandy tailings, as presented in
[0067] As presented in
[0068] After carrying out tests with different percentages of each type of tailing, it is recommended the use of at most 90% by weight of sandy tailings, since the greater the amount of sandy tailings, the greater the wind drag after building the piles. For the disposal of only sandy tailings, a very efficient or aggressive wind drag combat system must also be provided, because when the surface moisture records values below 5.5% (mining moisture), the volume of dragged particles is very high. Wind drag is significantly reduced with the presence of ultra-fine tailings together with the sandy tailings.
[0069] With regard to the proportion of used ultra-fine tailings, it is recommended the use of at most 20% by weight of ultra-fine tailings, since exceeding this percentage leads to a significant drop in performance in terms of the workability aspect of the piles. This happens because the moisture of the total filtered tailings exceeds the critical moisture, above 100% of the material saturation degree, causing great difficulty in the construction of the landfill, with the presence of a “rubbery” behavior (large openings in the landfill generated by the attempt to move trucks). Therefore, it is not possible to compact the tailings immediately after they are disposed of in the pile. If more than 20% of ultra-fine tailings are used, a resting period is required after the tailings are disposed of in the landfill, between 4 to 5 days, to ensure moisture reduction, and only then compacting the tailings. This fact renders the operationalization of the process unfeasible.
[0070] Therefore, one concludes that the use of 80 to 90% by weight of sandy tailings and, consequently, 10 to 20% of ultra-fine tailings is the ideal proportion for an efficient and technically and economically viable process, however, without limiting the use of other proportions by means of the present invention.
[0071] The mixture of the sandy tailings with the ultra-fine tailings is carried out in a stirring tank, with a stirring time of 10 to 15 minutes, or until the material is completely homogenized. In this same mixing tank, coagulant reagent is added at the rate of 100 to 130 g/t (grams of coagulant per ton of tailings mixture) and the stirring must be maintained for at least 10 minutes more.
[0072] The used coagulant reagent must be a product that promotes coagulation in order to remove suspended solids, perform solid/liquid separation and accelerate the sedimentation of solids. An example of this reagent is the coagulant WD 545PI, commercialized by the company Werdyal Tratamento Ambiental Ltda. The addition of a coagulant can reduce the pH of the mixture, enhancing the subsequent filtration step.
[0073] According to
[0074] It is indispensable that the addition of flocculant be carried out immediately before the filtering step, since the shear forces resulting from agitation or pumping can break the flakes, impairing the integrity thereof. For this reason, installing a flocculation box immediately before filtering is recommended.
[0075] The flocculant agent is added at a rate of 15 to 30 g/t (grams of flocculant per ton of tailings mixture). An example of this reagent is the anionic flocculant powder FLOPAM AN 934 MPM, commercialized by the company SNF Floerger.
[0076] As presented in
[0077] The filtered tailings then proceed to the last step of the process of the present invention, according to
[0078] The construction method commonly adopted in sterile pile operations is applied using layers with different heights. In this method, a crawler tractor levels (“breaks”) the pile of material, spreading the tailings and controlling the advance of the formation of the uniform thickness layer, and creating a new area (“place”) for the materials to be disposed of by the trucks. The process repeats until the final height level of the next layer. The compaction of the landfills is carried out through the movement of trucks and tractors over the landfill surface.
[0079] Thus, although only a few embodiments of the invention have been shown, it will be understood that several omissions, substitutions, and alterations can be made by a person skilled in the art, without teaching away the spirit and scope of the present invention. The embodiments described are to be considered only as illustrative and not restrictive in any aspects.
[0080] It is expressly provided that all combinations of elements that perform the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the invention. Substitutions of elements from one described embodiment to another are also fully intended and contemplated. It is also necessary to understand that the drawings are not necessarily made in scale, being only conceptual in nature. The intent is, therefore, to be limited, as indicated by the scope of the attached claims.
[0081] The following example is offered in order to assist in the understanding of the present invention and should not be considered as limiting its scope.
EXAMPLE
[0082] Tests were carried out for the processing of iron ore tailings, in a pilot plant, with the objective of evaluating the technical-operational feasibility of the disposal of tailings in piles. To carry out the tests, tailings were used from the processing of compact itabirite stemming from iron ore operations located in the Quadrilátero Ferrífero region (state of Minas Gerais, Brazil).
[0083] Table 1 shows the average chemical composition of the sandy tailings and ultra-fine tailings used in the pilot plant tests.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Chemical composition of iron ore tailings PPP (%) Fe SiO.sub.2 P Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Mn TiO.sub.2 CaO MgO Loss due to (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) calcination Sandy 19.3 70.5 0.02 0.61 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 1.16 Tailings Ultra-fine 48.9 16.3 0.13 5.39 0.18 0.28 0.02 0.12 7.39 Tailings
[0084] The first step consisted of thickening the ultra-fine tailings in a high-density thickener (HD—High Density). The obtained underflow had a solid mass concentration of 45% to 55%.
[0085] The second step consisted of thickening the sandy tailings in a conventional thickener. A conventional thickener measuring 8.2 meters in diameter was used, with a processing capacity of 110 t/h. The unit area was 0.020 m.sup.2/t/day. Despite a flocculant dosing system has been installed, it has not required for the tested tailings, as it has been possible to reach the expected concentration of solids in the underflow (60 to 65%), without an extensive presence of solids in the overflow (<0.3%). Even with the sparse presence of solids, the overflow was cloudy, as the pH of the slurry in the thickener feed, or flotation tailings, has been between 8.4 to 8.9 and at this pH value the ultrafine particles are dispersed, making the flow become a colloid.
[0086] The third step consisted of mixing the sandy tailings with the ultra-fine tailings in a stirring tank. Several tests were carried out to observe the behavior of tailings mixtures with different percentages of sandy tailings and ultra-fine tailings. However, the best results were obtained when the limit of 20% ultra-fine tailings and 90% sandy tailings was not exceeded, as can be seen in Table 2. Therefore, one has concluded that the use of 80 to 90% by weight of sandy tailings and, consequently, 10 to 20% of ultra-fine tailings is ideal for an efficient and technically and economically viable process. The stirring time for homogenization of the tailings mixture ranged from 10 to 15 minutes.
[0087]
[0088] In the mixing tank itself, the WD 545PI coagulant reagent, commercialized by the company Werdyal Tratamento Ambiental, was added at the original concentration of 89%. For the tests with the mixture containing the proportion of 80% sandy tailings to 20% ultra-fine tailings, the amount of added coagulant was 114 g/t (grams of coagulant per ton of tailing mixture). For the tests with the mixture containing the proportion of 90% sandy tailings to 10% ultra-fine tailings, the amount of added coagulant was 116 g/t (grams of coagulant per ton of tailing mixture). The tank stirring was maintained for 10 minutes after the addition of the coagulant. The addition of the coagulant reduced the pH of the mixture from 8.5-9.0 to 6.0-8.0. The increase in acidity benefits the subsequent filtration step.
[0089] The fourth step consisted of adding the anionic flocculant powder reagent FLOPAM AN 934 MPM, commercialized by the company SNF Floerger, diluted at 0.5%, to the tailings mixture. For the tests with the mixture containing the proportion of 80% sandy tailings to 20% ultra-fine tailings, the amount of added flocculant was 21 g/t (grams of coagulant per ton of tailing mixture). For the tests with the mixture containing the proportion of 90% sandy tailings to 10% ultra-fine tailings, the amount of added flocculant was 18 g/t (grams of coagulant per ton of tailing mixture). The flocculant was added in the flocculation box, which is located immediately before the vacuum disc filter.
[0090] The fifth stage of the process consisted of filtering the mixture in a vertical vacuum disc filter. A FLSmidth filter was used with 10 discs measuring 6 meters in diameter, with 47m.sup.2 of filtering area.
[0091] The tailings mixture was filtered, immediately after the addition of flocculant, and the unit filtration rate (UFR) ranged from 1.4 to 2.4 t/h/m.sup.2, as can be seen in Table 2. The moisture content of the final filtered cake was about 14%. The vacuum disc filter operated in a speed range of 1 to 2 rpm.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Result of the tailing mixture filtering in a vacuum disc filter Real Ratio UFR Dry Desired Ultra- Dp Drs Solids (t/h/m.sub.2) Moisture Cake Date Ratio Sandy fine t/m.sub.3 t/m.sub.3 % wet dry % t/h pH 14/jun 57/43 57.75 42.25 1.51 3.31 48.41 0.24 0.20 17.94 9.26 6.89 01/jun 70/30 72.6 27.4 1.83 3.13 66.66 0.78 0.67 13.78 31.61 6.15 01/jun 70/30 72.6 27.4 1.8 3.13 65.32 1.51 1.28 15.05 60.37 5.99 06/jun 70/30 71.23 28.77 1.69 3.15 59.86 0.99 0.83 16.08 39.05 7.05 09/jun 70/30 70.13 29.87 1.76 3.16 63.19 1.10 0.92 15.97 43.44 6.84 09/jun 70/30 70.13 29.87 1.76 3.16 63.19 1.25 1.04 16.62 48.99 6.94 12/jun 70/30 70 30 1.82 3.16 65.91 1.64 1.40 14.52 65.77 6.86 31/may 80/20 81 19 1.74 3.03 63.50 0.70 0.61 12.97 28.63 6.3 31/may 80/20 81 19 1.74 3.03 63.50 1.43 1.25 12.76 58.63 6.07 05/jun 80/20 79.8 20.2 1.74 3.04 63.35 1.48 1.24 16.33 58.20 6.26 05/jun 80/20 79.8 20.2 1.79 3.04 65.74 1.98 1.68 15.25 78.87 6.51 06/jun 80/20 80 20 1.69 3.04 60.82 1.36 1.14 16.08 53.64 7.05 14/jun 80/20 80 20 1.65 3.04 58.68 1.28 1.10 14.10 51.68 6.6 08/aug 80/20 80 20 1.68 3.04 60.32 1.34 1.16 13.72 54.34 6.6 16/aug 80/20 80 20 1.51 3.04 50.33 0.90 0.78 13.05 36.78 6.6 22/aug 80/20 80 20 1.65 3.04 58.70 1.30 1.12 14.00 52.55 6.6 29/aug 80/20 80 20 1.71 3.04 61.87 1.35 1.16 13.98 54.58 6.6 15/sep 80/20 80 20 1.68 3.04 60.32 1.35 1.16 13.81 54.69 6.6 21/sep 80/20 80 20 1.73 3.04 62.88 1.36 1.17 14.01 54.96 6.83 28/sep 80/20 80 20 1.74 3.04 63.38 1.35 1.16 13.99 54.57 6.95 03/act 80/20 80 20 1.76 3.04 64.35 1.39 1.20 14.02 56.17 7.01 02/jun 90/10 89.9 10.1 1.74 2.92 64.67 1.01 0.88 12.7 41.44 6.27 02/jun 90/10 89.9 10.1 1.71 2.92 63.13 2.43 2.12 12.96 99.41 6.32 03/jan 90/10 90 10 1.74 2.92 64.68 2.20 1.90 13.56 89.38 —
[0092] Regarding disc filters, two types of filtering fabrics from different suppliers were used, both of which yielded an excellent performance. They were: [0093] Casfil supplier: 100% polypropylene fiber; monofilament string; satin texture; grammage 285 g/m.sup.2; thickness 0.48 mm; air permeability 36 m.sup.3/min/m.sup.2; calendered finish. [0094] Valmet supplier: PT2031 SK filter screen; monofilament string.
[0095] The special slurry pump used was a Nash-Krogh model (outlet ∅=1.5″×rotor ∅=9″), which proved to be an excellent option to replace the barometric leg.
[0096] The use of the coagulant and flocculant allowed for a good filtering performance, without impacting the useful life of the filter fabric, which remained around 2,100 hours, without foundation and without the need to use washing water.
[0097] The filtered tailings then proceeded to the step of disposal in piles. The filtered tailings were transported from the filtration plant to the disposal site, where they were unloaded, spread, and shaped into layers using a crawler tractor.
[0098] The first built experimental pile had the following dimensions: 160 meters length, 60 meters width, and 8.2 meters height. The construction of this experimental pile was carried out in layers, with height ranging from 600 mm to 4,000 mm. The dimensions of the subsequent built piles ranged according to the experience of the involved geotechnicians.
[0099] Tests carried out on all layers showed excellent geotechnical results. In the layers between 600 mm and 1,000 mm, optimum workability was identified with degrees of compaction near optimum humidity.
[0100] The compaction of the landfills was carried out through the movement of trucks and tractors over the landfill surface. Table 3 presents the critical moisture values in the piles.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Average results of the filtering and piling of tailing mixtures Proportion Dos. Dos. UFR Moisture in the Critical Moisture Sandy Ultra- Coag. Floc. (t/h/m.sup.2) Filter (%) in the Pile (%) Tail. fine Tail. g/t g/t Wet base Mining Geotechnical Mining Geotechnical 100 — — — 2.49 13.0 14.9 17.94 9.26 90 10 116 18 2.27 14.4 16.8 13.78 31.61 80 20 114 21 1.53 14.5 17.0 15.05 60.37 70 30 110 25 1.38 15.3 18.0 16.08 39.05
[0101] The mixture containing 80% sandy tailings and 20% ultra-fine tailings had an average geotechnical moisture in the order of 17.0% at the outlet of the disc filter, with a good performance in general, but in some instances moisture levels were found that hindered the performance of activities at the landfill, identified in
[0102] From field observations, this landfill was considered satisfactory, and this proportion is being recommended for use in industrial scale filtered pile tailing projects, although some difficulties have been identified in relation to the workability of the material immediately after the filter outlet, as can be seen in
[0103] The mixture containing 90% sandy tailings and 10% ultra-fine tailings presented excellent workability without moisture values approaching critical moisture, without the occurrence of difficulties in the construction of the landfill. The variation in filter outlet moistures below the saturation zone can be found in
[0104] It is observed in
[0105]
[0106] After the construction of the piles, a test was carried out with an off-road truck, model 775, loaded with approximately 60 tons of sterile. For the pile built with the mixture containing 80% of sandy tailings and 20% of ultra-fine tailings, the ground compression was equivalent with the dump truck, commonly used to build the piles, as shown in
[0107] Experimental landfills presented excellent results in terms of filtering and constructive workability, in addition to satisfactory results from field and laboratory geotechnical tests, and, for this reason, they are being recommended for future projects of disposal in filtered tailing piles. The project criteria and assumptions to be adopted must be determined according to the geometric configurations of the pile and the characteristics of its foundation.
[0108] Three forms of vegetation planting in the piles were further tested, namely (i) direct planting on the tailings, (ii) planting on a vegetal mesh and (iii) planting using a top soil layer.
[0109]