Pneumatic tire
11446965 · 2022-09-20
Assignee
Inventors
- Takanori Uemura (Hiratsuka, JP)
- Takayuki Shiraishi (Hiratsuka, JP)
- Hiraku Kouda (Hiratsuka, JP)
- Tatsuro Shinzawa (Hiratsuka, JP)
Cpc classification
B60C11/1204
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/1281
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/1263
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60C11/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
In a pneumatic tire, a sipe includes an edge on a leading side and an edge on a trailing side; the edge on the leading side and the edge on the trailing side each include a chamfered portion shorter than a sipe length of the sipe; a non-chamfered region in which other chamfered portions are not present is provided at portions facing the chamfered portions of the sipe; and for all chamfered portions, including at least the chamfered portions of the sipe, formed on grooves other than main grooves, a total projected area A.sub.IN of the chamfered portions located on a vehicle mounting inner side and a total projected area A.sub.OUT of the chamfered portions located on a vehicle mounting outer side satisfy a relationship A.sub.IN>A.sub.OUT.
Claims
1. A pneumatic tire with a designated mounting direction with respect to a vehicle, comprising: in a tread portion, main grooves extending in a tire circumferential direction; and a sipe extending in a tire lateral direction disposed in ribs defined by the main grooves; wherein the sipe comprises an edge on a leading side and an edge on a trailing side; the edge on the leading side and the edge on the trailing side each comprise a chamfered portion shorter than a sipe length of the sipe, only one of the chamfered portions being present on each of the leading side and the trailing side; a non-chamfered region in which other chamfered portions are not present is provided at portions facing the chamfered portions of the sipe; and for all chamfered portions, comprising at least the chamfered portions of the sipe, formed on grooves other than the main grooves, a total projected area A.sub.IN of the chamfered portions located on a vehicle mounting inner side and a total projected area A.sub.OUT of the chamfered portions located on a vehicle mounting outer side satisfy a relationship A.sub.IN>A.sub.OUT, and the ribs are intermediate land portions disposed offset from the tire equatorial plane, the sipe in one of the intermediate land portions opens at ends to two of the main grooves, and the sipe in an other one of the intermediate land portions terminates in the other one of the intermediate land portions.
2. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein a maximum depth x (mm) of the sipe and a maximum depth y (mm) of the chamfered portions satisfy a relationship x×0.1≤y≤x×0.3+1.0; and a sipe width of the sipe is constant in a range from an end portion located on an inner side in a tire radial direction of the chamfered portions to a groove bottom of the sipe.
3. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the total projected area A.sub.IN of the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting inner side and the total projected area AouT of the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting outer side satisfy a relationship
3%≤(A.sub.IN−A.sub.OUT)/A.sub.IN×100%≤50%.
4. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the sipe is disposed in two or more ribs of the ribs defined by the main grooves.
5. The pneumatic tire according to claim 4, wherein the all chamfered portions consist of the chamfered portions of the sipes.
6. The pneumatic tire according to claim 2, wherein the total projected area A.sub.IN of the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting inner side and the total projected area A.sub.OUT of the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting outer side satisfy a relationship 3%≤(A.sub.IN−A.sub.OUT)/A.sub.IN×100%≤50%.
7. The pneumatic tire according to claim 6, wherein the sipe is disposed in two or more ribs of the ribs defined by the main grooves.
8. The pneumatic tire according to claim 7, wherein the all chamfered portions consist of the chamfered portions of the sipes.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(11) Configurations of embodiments of the present technology are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. In
(12) As illustrated in
(13) A carcass layer 4 is mounted between the pair of bead portions 3, 3. The carcass layer 4 includes a plurality of reinforcing cords extending in the tire radial direction and is folded back around bead cores 5 disposed in each of the bead portions 3 from a tire inner side to a tire outer side. A bead filler 6 having a triangular cross-sectional shape formed from rubber composition is disposed on the outer circumference of the bead core 5.
(14) A plurality of belt layers 7 are embedded on the outer circumferential side of the carcass layer 4 in the tread portion 1. The belt layers 7 each include a plurality of reinforcing cords that are inclined with respect to the tire circumferential direction, with the reinforcing cords of the different layers arranged in a criss-cross manner. In the belt layers 7, the inclination angle of the reinforcing cords with respect to the tire circumferential direction ranges from, for example, 10° to 40°. Steel cords are preferably used as the reinforcing cords of the belt layers 7. To improve high-speed durability, at least one belt cover layer 8, formed by arranging reinforcing cords at an angle of, for example, not greater than 5° with respect to the tire circumferential direction, is disposed on an outer circumferential side of the belt layers 7. Nylon, aramid, or similar organic fiber cords are preferably used as the reinforcing cords of the belt cover layer 8.
(15) Note that the tire internal structure described above represents a typical example for a pneumatic tire, and the pneumatic tire is not limited thereto.
(16) Sipes 11 including a pair of chamfered portions 12 are formed in each of the center rib 100A and the intermediate ribs 100B, 100C. The sipes 11 includes a sipe 110A disposed in the center rib 100A and sipes 110B, 110C disposed in each of the intermediate ribs 100B, 100C. The chamfered portions 12 include a chamfered portion 120A formed on the sipe 110A, a chamfered portion 120B formed on the sipe 110B, and a chamfered portion 120C formed on the sipe 110C.
(17) The sipes 110A are inclined in the same direction with respect to the tire lateral direction and are formed at intervals in the tire circumferential direction in the center rib 100A. One end of the sipe 110A communicates with the inner main groove 9A, and the other end terminates within the center rib 100A. That is, the sipe 110A is a semi-closed sipe.
(18) The sipes 110B are inclined in the same direction with respect to the tire lateral direction and are formed at intervals in the tire circumferential direction in the intermediate rib 100B. One end of the sipe 110B communicates with the inner main groove 9A, and the other end communicates with the outer main groove 9B. That is, the sipe 110B is an open sipe. The sipes 110C are inclined in the same direction with respect to the tire lateral direction and are formed at intervals in the tire circumferential direction in the intermediate rib 100C. One end of the sipe 110C terminates within the intermediate rib 100C, and the other end communicates with the outer main groove 9B. That is, the sipe 110C is a semi-closed sipe.
(19) Lug grooves 200 that do not communicate with the outer main groove 9B extend in the tire lateral direction, are inclined in the same direction with respect to the tire lateral direction, and are formed at intervals in the tire circumferential direction in the shoulder ribs 100D, 100E. The lug grooves 200 include lug grooves 200A formed in the shoulder rib 100D and lug grooves 200B formed in the shoulder rib 100E.
(20)
(21) As illustrated in
(22) The chamfered portions 12 includes a chamfered portion 12A on the leading side with respect to the rotation direction R and a chamfered portion 12B on the trailing side with respect to the rotation direction R. At portions facing the chamfered portions 12, non-chamfered regions 13 in which other chamfered portions are not present are provided. In other words, a non-chamfered region 13B on the trailing side with respect to the rotation direction R is provided at a portion facing the chamfered portion 12A, and a non-chamfered region 13A on the leading side with respect to the rotation direction R is provided at a portion facing the chamfered portion 12B. The chamfered portion 12 and the non-chamfered region 13 in which other chamfered portions are not present are disposed adjacent to one another on the edge 11A on the leading side and the edge 11B on the trailing side of the sipe 11 in this manner.
(23) As illustrated in
(24)
(25) In the pneumatic tire described above, for all of the chamfered portions, including at least the chamfered portions 12 of the sipes 11, formed on grooves other than the main grooves 9, a total projected area A.sub.IN of all the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting inner side and a total projected area A.sub.OUT of all the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting outer side satisfy the relationship A.sub.IN>A.sub.OUT. In the embodiment of
(26) As illustrated in
(27) In the pneumatic tire described above, the chamfered portion 12 that is shorter than the sipe length L of the sipe 11 is provided on each of the edge 11A on the leading side and the edge 11B on the trailing side of the sipe 11, and the non-chamfered regions 13 in which other chamfered portions are not present, are disposed at the portions facing the chamfered portions 12 of the sipe 11. Thus, the drainage effect can be improved with the chamfered portions 12, and a water film can be effectively removed by the edge effect in the non-chamfered regions 13 in which the chamfered portion 12 is not provided. As a result, the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be greatly improved. Moreover, the chamfered portion 12 and the non-chamfered region 13 in which chamfered portions are not present, are disposed alongside each other on the edge 11A on the leading side and the edge 11B on the trailing side in this manner. Thus, the effect of enhancing wet performance as described above when braking and driving can be maximally achieved. Furthermore, the vehicle mounting outer side is a large contributor to noise performance. Thus, for all the chamfered portions, including at least the chamfered portions 12 of the sipes 11, which are chamfered portions formed on grooves other than the main grooves 9, by the total projected area A.sub.OUT of the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting outer side being relatively small, the ground contact pressure on the vehicle mounting outer side can be reduced, which leads to a reduction in noise generated when running. As a result, the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces, the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces, and noise performance can be enhanced in a well-balanced manner.
(28) In the pneumatic tire described above, the maximum depth x (mm) and the maximum depth y (mm) preferably satisfy the relationship of Formula (1) below. By providing the sipes 11 and the chamfered portions 12 so as to satisfy the relationship of Formula (1) below, compared to a known chamfered sipe, the chamfered area can be minimized, so the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces can be improved. As a result, the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be improved in a compatible manner. Here, when y<x×0.1 is true, the drainage effect from the chamfered portions 12 is insufficient, and when y>x×0.3+1.0 is true, the rigidity of the rib 10 is reduced, leading to a reduction in the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces. In particular, the relationship y≤x×0.3+0.5 is preferably satisfied.
x×0.1≤y≤x×0.3+1.0 (1)
(29) For the all chamfered portions, the total projected area A.sub.IN of the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting inner side and the total projected area A.sub.OUT of the chamfered portions located on the vehicle mounting outer side preferably satisfy the following Formula (2). More preferably, the range is from 10% to 30%. By setting the total projected area difference between the total projected area A.sub.IN of the chamfered portions on the vehicle mounting inner side and the total projected area A.sub.OUT of the chamfered portions on the vehicle mounting outer side in this manner, an effect of suppressing noise can be obtained, and both the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be enhanced.
3%≤(A.sub.IN−A.sub.OUT)/A.sub.IN×100%≤50% (2)
(30) In the pneumatic tire described above, the sipes 11 are preferably disposed in two or more ribs 10 of the plurality of ribs 10 defined by the main grooves 9. With the sipes 11 being disposed in two or more of the ribs 10 in this manner, the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be enhanced in a well-balanced manner.
(31) In particular, all the chamfered portions including at least the chamfered portions 12 of the sipes 11, which are chamfered portions formed on grooves other than the main grooves 9, are preferably configured by the chamfered portion 12 of the sipe 11. In such a case, the total projected area difference (A.sub.IN−A.sub.OUT) between the total projected area A.sub.IN of all the chamfered portions on the vehicle mounting inner side and the total projected area A.sub.OUT of all the chamfered portions on the vehicle mounting outer side is equal to the total projected area difference (A.sub.IN′−A.sub.OUT′) between the total projected area A.sub.IN′ of the chamfered portions 12 of the sipes 11 on the vehicle mounting inner side and the total projected area A.sub.OUT′ of the chamfered portions 12 of the sipes 11 on the vehicle mounting outer side. With all of the chamfered portions described above being configured by only the chamfered portion 12 in this manner, the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be enhanced in a well-balanced manner.
(32)
(33) In an embodiment of the present technology, the side having the inclination angle θ on the acute angle side of the sipe 11 is defined as the acute angle side, and the side having the inclination angle θ on the obtuse angle side of the sipe 11 is defined as the obtuse angle side. The chamfered portions 12A, 12B formed on the edges 11A, 11B of the sipe 11 are formed on the acute angle side of the sipe 11. With the sipe 11 being chamfered on the acute angle side in this manner, uneven wear resistance performance can be further enhanced. Alternatively, the chamfered portions 12A, 12B may be formed on the obtuse angle side of the sipe 11. With the chamfered portion 12 being formed on the obtuse angle side of the sipe 11 in this manner, the edge effect is increased, and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be further improved.
(34) In an embodiment of the present technology, the overall shape of the sipe 11 described above is curved, allowing the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces to be improved. However, a portion of the sipe 11 may have a curved or bent shape in a plan view. With the sipe 11 being formed in this manner, the total amount of edges 11A, 11B of the sipes 11 is increased, and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be improved.
(35) As illustrated in
(36) The maximum width of the chamfered portion 12 measured in the direction orthogonal to the sipe 11 is defined as a width W1. The maximum width W1 of the chamfered portion 12 is preferably from 0.8 times to 5.0 times the sipe width W of the sipe 11, and more preferably from 1.2 times to 3.0 times. With the maximum width W1 of the chamfered portion 12 being appropriately set with respect to the sipe width W in this manner, the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be improved in a compatible manner. When the maximum width W1 of the chamfered portion 12 is less than 0.8 times the sipe width W of the sipe 11, the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces cannot be sufficiently improved, and when the maximum width W1 is greater than 5.0 times the sipe width W, the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces cannot be sufficiently improved.
(37) Furthermore, the outer edge portion in the longitudinal direction of the chamfered portion 12 is formed parallel with the extension direction of the sipe 11. With the chamfered portion 12 extending parallel with the sipe 11 in this way, uneven wear resistance performance can be improved, and the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be improved in a compatible manner.
(38) As illustrated in
(39)
(40)
(41) The height in the tire radial direction of the raised bottom portion 14 formed in the sipe 11 is defined as a height H.sub.14. For the raised bottom portion 14A formed not at the end portion of the sipe 11, the maximum height from the groove bottom of the sipe 11 to the top surface of the raised bottom portion 14A is defined as a height H.sub.14A. The height H.sub.14A is preferably from 0.2 times to 0.5 times the maximum depth x of the sipe 11, and more preferably from 0.3 times to 0.4 times. By setting the height H.sub.14A of the raised bottom portion 14A disposed not at the end portion of the sipe 11 to a suitable height, the rigidity of the block 101 can be improved and the drainage effect can be maintained. As a result, the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be improved. Here, when the height H.sub.14A is less than 0.2 times the maximum depth x of the sipe 11, the rigidity of the block 101 cannot be sufficiently improved, and when the height H.sub.14A is greater than 0.5 times the maximum depth x of the sipe 11, the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces cannot be sufficiently improved.
(42) For the raised bottom portions 14B formed at both end portions of the sipe 11, the maximum height from the groove bottom of the sipe 11 to the top surface of the raised bottom portion 14B is defined as a height H.sub.14B. The height H.sub.14B is preferably from 0.6 times to 0.9 times the maximum depth x of the sipe 11, and more preferably from 0.7 times to 0.8 times. By setting the height H.sub.14B of the raised bottom portions 14B disposed at the end portions of the sipe 11 to a suitable height, the rigidity of the block 101 can be improved and the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces can be improved. Here, when the height H.sub.14B is less than 0.6 times the maximum depth x of the sipe 11, the rigidity of the block 101 cannot be sufficiently improved, and when the height H.sub.14B is greater than 0.9 times the maximum depth x of the sipe 11, the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces cannot be sufficiently improved.
(43) The length in the tire lateral direction of the raised bottom portion 14 of the sipe 11 is defined as a raised bottom length L.sub.14. The raised bottom lengths L.sub.14A, L.sub.14B of the raised bottom portions 14A, 14B is preferably from 0.3 times to 0.7 times the sipe length L, and more preferably from 0.4 times to 0.6 times. By the raised bottom lengths L.sub.14A, L.sub.14B of the raised bottom portions 14A, 14B being appropriately set in this manner, the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and the steering stability performance on wet road surfaces can be improved in a compatible manner.
Examples
(44) Tires according to a Conventional Example 1, 2 and Examples 1 to 5 were manufactured. The tires have a tire size of 245/40R19 and a designated mounting direction with respect to a vehicle and include, in a tread portion, main grooves extending in the tire circumferential direction, ribs defined by the main grooves, and sipes extending in the tire lateral direction in the ribs. The tires are set as indicated in Table 1 for the following: chamfer arrangement (both sides or one side), size relationship between sipe length L and chamfer lengths L.sub.A, L.sub.B, chamfer provided at portion facing chamfered portion, size relationship between total projected area A.sub.IN of all chamfered portions on the vehicle mounting inner side and total projected area A.sub.OUT of all chamfered portions on the vehicle mounting outer side, sipe width, total projected area difference between all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting inner side and all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting outer side ((A.sub.IN−A.sub.OUT)/A.sub.IN×100%), the number of ribs with sipes including chamfered portions, and total projected area difference between chamfered portions of sipes on the vehicle mounting inner side and chamfered portions of sipes on the vehicle mounting outer side ((A.sub.IN′−A.sub.OUT′)/A.sub.IN′×100%).
(45) Note that in Table 1, when the value of the “total projected area difference between all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting inner side and all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting outer side” is the same as the value of the “total projected area difference between chamfered portions of sipes on vehicle mounting inner side and chamfered portions of sipes on vehicle mounting outer side”, this means that all the chamfered portions including at least the chamfered portions of the sipes, which are chamfered portions formed on grooves other than main grooves, are configured by the chamfered portion of the sipe.
(46) These test tires underwent a sensory evaluation by a test driver for steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and steering stability performance on wet road surfaces and a sensory evaluation for noise performance. The results thereof are shown in Table 1.
(47) Sensory evaluation for steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and steering stability performance on wet road surfaces was performed with the test tires on a wheel with a rim size of 19×8.5 J mounted on a vehicle and inflated to an air pressure of 260 kPa. Evaluation results are expressed as index values, with the results of Conventional Example 1 being assigned as an index value of 100. Larger index values indicate superior steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and steering stability performance on wet road surfaces.
(48) The sensory evaluation for noise performance was performed with the test tires on a wheel with a rim size of 19×8.5 J mounted on a vehicle and inflated to an air pressure of 260 kPa. Evaluation results are expressed as index values, with the results of Conventional Example 1 being assigned as an index value of 100. Larger index values indicate superior noise performance.
(49) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Conventional Conventional Example 1 Example 2 Example 1 Chamfer arrangement (both sides Both sides Ones ide Both sides or one side) Size relationship between sipe L = L.sub.A, L.sub.B L= L.sub.A L > L.sub.A, L.sub.B length L and chamfer lengths L.sub.A, L.sub.B Chamfer provided at portion facing Yes No No chamfered portion Size relationship between total A.sub.IN = A.sub.OUT A.sub.IN = A.sub.OUT A.sub.IN > A.sub.OUT projected area A.sub.IN of all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting inner side and total projected area A.sub.OUT of all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting outer side Sipe width Constant Changes Changes Total projected area difference 0% 0% 3% between all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting inner side and all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting outer side ((A.sub.IN − A.sub.OUT)/A.sub.IN × 100%) Number of ribs with sipes including 1 1 1 chamfered portions Total projected area difference 0% 0% 3% between chamfered portions of sipes on vehicle mounting inner side and chamfered portions of sipes on vehicle mounting outer side ((A.sub.IN′ − A.sub.OU′)/A.sub.IN′ × 100%) Steering stability performance on dry 100 90 105 road surfaces Steering stability performance on wet 100 105 105 road surfaces Noise performance 100 100 102 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Chamfer arrangement (both sides or one side) Both sides Both sides Both sides Both sides Size relationship between sipe L > L.sub.A, L.sub.B L > L.sub.A, L.sub.B L > L.sub.A, L.sub.B L > L.sub.A, L.sub.B length L and chamfer lengths L.sub.A, L.sub.B Chamfer provided at portion No No No No facing chamfered portion Size relationship between total A.sub.IN > A.sub.OUT A.sub.IN > A.sub.OUT A.sub.IN > A.sub.OUT A.sub.IN > A.sub.OUT projected area A.sub.IN of all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting inner side and total projected area A.sub.OUT of all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting outer side Sipe width Constant Constant Constant Constant Total projected area difference 3% 20% 20% 20% between all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting inner side and all chamfered portions on vehicle mounting outer side ((A.sub.IN − A.sub.OUT)/A.sub.IN × 100%) Number of ribs with sipes 1 1 3 3 including chamfered portions Total projected area difference 3% 3% 3% 20% between chamfered portions of sipes on vehicle mounting inner side and chamfered portions of sipes on vehicle mounting outer side ((A.sub.IN′ − A.sub.OU′)/A.sub.IN′ × 100%) Steering stability performance on 106 107 108 109 dry road surfaces Steering stability performance on 106 107 108 109 wet road surfaces Noise performance 102 102 104 104
(50) As can be seen from Table 1, by devising the shape of the chamfered portions formed on the sipes, the tires of Examples 1 to 5 have enhanced noise performance and both enhanced steering stability performance on dry road surfaces and enhanced steering stability performance on wet road surfaces.