PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS COMPRISING SODIUM PALMITOYL-L-PROLYL-L-PROLYLGLYCYL-L-TYROSINATE AND METHODS FOR PREPARING THE SAME

Abstract

The present invention relates to a pharmaceutical formulation having excellent bioavailability and stability, comprising sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate (Compound I) as an active ingredient. The pharmaceutical formulation according to the present invention can be usefully used as a dosage form for treating inflammatory bowel disease and the like since Compound I, an active ingredient, is not decomposed in the stomach and released in the intestine.

Claims

1. A pharmaceutical formulation comprising a sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate salt of Formula 1 below. ##STR00007##

2. The pharmaceutical formulation for oral administration according to claim 1, characterized in that the pharmaceutical formulation is in the form of a tablet or capsule.

3. A pharmaceutical formulation for oral administration comprising a sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate salt of Formula 1 below and an enteric polymer. ##STR00008##

4. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the enteric polymer is at least one selected from the group consisting of a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer, a methyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate-methacrylic acid copolymer, a methacrylic acid-ethyl acrylate copolymer, cellulose acetate phthalate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate trimellitate, carboxymethyl ethyl cellulose, and shellac.

5. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the enteric polymer is a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer, a methyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate-methacrylic acid copolymer, or a mixture thereof.

6. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the enteric polymer is a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate 1:1 copolymer, a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate 1:2 copolymer, or a mixture thereof.

7. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the enteric polymer is a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate 1:2 copolymer.

8. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the enteric polymer comprises a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate 1:1 copolymer and a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate 1:2 copolymer in a weight ratio of 1:1.

9. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the pharmaceutical formulation comprises the enteric polymer in an amount of 10 to 300 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of the sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate salt.

10. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the pharmaceutical formulation comprises the enteric polymer in an amount of 20 to 80 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of the sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate.

11. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the pharmaceutical formulation further comprises at least one additive selected from the group consisting of microcrystalline cellulose, mannitol, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), polyethylene oxide, sodium croscarmellose, crospovidone, polyoxyglyceride, magnesium aluminometasilicate, magnesium stearate, talc, and sodium starch glycolate.

12. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the pharmaceutical formulation further comprises at least one additive selected from the group consisting of magnesium stearate, sodium starch glycolate, talc, and triethyl citrate (TEC).

13. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that the pharmaceutical formulation comprises a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate 1:2 copolymer as the enteric polymer, and further comprises hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and magnesium stearate.

14. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate is dissolved at pH 6.0 or higher.

15. The pharmaceutical formulation according to claim 3, characterized in that in the dissolution test at 37° C. and 100 rpm according to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) type 2 paddle method, 20% or less of sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate is dissolved in a pH 6.0 buffer for 1 hour, and 80% or more of sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate is dissolved in a pH 7.4 buffer for 1 hour.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0021] FIG. 1 is a typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate (Compound I).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION FOR WORKING THE INVENTION

[0022] The pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention comprises sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate (Compound I), a compound of Formula 1 below, as an active ingredient:

##STR00003##

[0023] The pharmaceutical formulation may be tablets such as plain tablets, coated tablets, multi-layered tablets, or pressure-coated tablets, powders, granules, or capsule, and may be suitably tablets or capsules, and may comprise a pharmaceutically acceptable additive.

[0024] Pharmaceutically acceptable additives are those known in the art as natural or synthetic materials that are suitable for use in humans and animals since they do not have excessive side effects (such as, toxicity, irritation, or allergic reaction). As pharmaceutically acceptable additives, for example, diluents, binders, disintegrating agents, lubricants, stabilizing agents, coloring agents, flavors, surfactants and the like may be used.

[0025] As a diluent, starch, microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, glucose, mannitol, alginate, alkaline earth metal salt, clay, polyethylene glycol and dicalcium phosphate and the like may be used, but are not limited thereto.

[0026] As a binder, starch, microcrystalline cellulose, highly dispersible silica, mannitol, lactose, polyethylene glycol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, natural gum, synthetic gum, copovidone and gelatin and the like may be used, but are not limited thereto.

[0027] As a disintegrating agent, starch or modified starch such as sodium starch glycolate, corn starch, potato starch or pregelatinized starch, microcrystalline cellulose, low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose or alginic acid, crosslinked celluloses such as sodium croscarmellose, gums such as guar gum and xanthan gum, and crosslinked polymers such as crospovidone and the like may be used.

[0028] As a lubricant, talc, magnesium stearate, lauryl sulfate, hydrogenated vegetable oil, sodium benzoate, sodium stearyl fumarate, glyceryl monostearate and polyethylene glycol and the like may be used, and as a stabilizing agent, ascorbic acid, citric acid, butylated hydroxy anisole, butylhydroxy toluene, tocopherol derivatives and the like may be used.

[0029] Surfactants include sodium lauryl sulfate and poloxamer, a poly(oxyethylene-oxypropylene) block copolymer, as well as pharmaceutically acceptable additives such as polyoxyglyceride, magnesium aluminometasilicate, triethyl citrate (TEC) may be selected and used.

[0030] In the examples of the present invention, (silicified) microcrystalline cellulose, crospovidone, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, magnesium stearate, talc, TEC and the like are used as such a additive, but the scope of the present invention is not limited to using the additive, and the above described additive may be included in a conventionally used dose by the selection of those of skill in the art.

[0031] The pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention may comprise an enteric polymer. The enteric polymer is able to allow Compound I, which is vulnerable to gastric acid and various digestive enzymes, to reach stably the large intestine and exhibit a therapeutic effect on inflammatory bowel disease and the like.

[0032] An enteric polymer having pH-dependent solubility in an aqueous environment of the gastrointestinal tract is known in the art and includes a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer, a methyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate-methacrylic acid copolymer, a methacrylic acid-ethyl acrylate copolymer, cellulose acetate phthalate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate trimellitate, carboxymethyl ethyl cellulose and shellac and the like.

[0033] A commercially available enteric polymer includes Eudragit® sold by Evonik Industries, and Eudragit® includes Eudragit® L 100 (a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer 1:1) and Eudragit® S 100 (a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer 1:2). Specifically, Eudragit® L 30 D-55 (a dispersion of a methacrylic acid-ethyl acrylate copolymer 1:1) and Eudragit® L-100-55 (a methacrylic acid-ethyl acrylate copolymer 1:1) have been reported to be dissolved at pH 5.5 or higher, and Eudragit® L100 (a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer 1:1) and Eudragit® L 12.5 (a solution of a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer 1:1) have been reported to be dissolved at pH 6.0 to 7.0, and Eudragit® S 100 (a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer 1:2), Eudragit® S 12.5 (a dispersion of a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer 1:2) and Eudragit® FS 30D (a dispersion of aqueous solution of a methyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate-methacrylic acid copolymer) have been reported to be dissolved at pH 7.0 or higher.

[0034] The pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention may further comprise anti-tacking agents and/or plasticizers, for example talc, triethyl citrate (TEC), glyceryl monostearate, acetyl triethyl citrate, acetyl tributyl citrate, polyethylene glycol, acetylated monoglyceride, glycerin, triacetin, propylene glycol, phthalate ester (for example, diethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate), titanium dioxide, ferric oxide, and the like.

[0035] In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention may comprise a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer as an enteric polymer, and may preferably comprise a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer 1:1 (Eudragit® L100), a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate copolymer 1:2 (Eudragit® S 100), or a mixture thereof.

[0036] In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention may comprise a methyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate-methacrylic acid copolymer (Eudragit® FS 30D) as an enteric polymer, and may further comprise PlasACRYL™ T20, which serves as an anti-tacking agent, a plasticizer, and a stabilizing agent.

[0037] In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention may be a matrix tablet comprising an enteric polymer in a matrix along with an active ingredient (Compound I) and other pharmaceutically acceptable additives, or a tablet coated with an enteric polymer.

[0038] In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention may be a capsule filled with a mixture of an active ingredient, an enteric polymer, and other pharmaceutically acceptable additives into a capsule, wherein the active ingredient may be filled into a capsule in the form of granules coated with an enteric polymer. In addition, the enteric polymer may coat a capsule containing an active ingredient. The capsule may be a gelatin capsule or an HPMC capsule, but is not limited thereto.

[0039] The pharmaceutical formulation according to the present invention may be prepared by methods known in the art, for example dry or wet granulation, roller compression or direct compression process.

[0040] In addition, in the pharmaceutical formulation according to the present invention, a method for preparing a coating layer may be appropriately selected from conventional methods for preparing a coating layer by those of skill in the art, and includes a fluidized bed coating method, a pan coating method, a dry coating method, and the like. The coating layer may be formed using a coating agent, a coating aid, or a mixture thereof. Also, in addition to an enteric coating to which an enteric polymer is applied, a seal coating (for example, Opadry Clear or Opadry AMB, manufactured by Colorcon) may be further applied.

[0041] The pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention may be prepared by 1) a method of mixing and compressing an active ingredient with an enteric polymer to prepare a tablet, 2) a method of treating an active ingredient with an enteric polymer to prepare granules and then filling a capsule with the granules, or 3) a method of filling a capsule with an active ingredient, and then coating the capsule with an enteric polymer, and the like.

[0042] In the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention, an enteric polymer may be included in an amount of 5 to 500 parts by weight, 10 to 300 parts by weight, or 15 to 100 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of an active ingredient, and may be preferably included in an amount of 20 to 80 parts by weight.

[0043] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a pharmaceutical formulation for oral administration for treating inflammatory bowel disease, comprising sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate (Compound I).

[0044] In one embodiment, in the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention, the active ingredient is dissolved in a condition of pH 7 or higher.

[0045] In one embodiment, for the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention, when the dissolution test in vitro is carried out at 37° C. and 100 rpm in a solvent of 500 mL of 0.1 N HCl for 1 to 2 hours, in a pH 6.0 buffer for 1 to 4 hours, in a pH 7.4 buffer for 1 to 6 hours according to the USP type 2 paddle method, the active ingredient is not substantially dissolved in a condition of 1 N HCl and pH 6.0, and 90% or more of the active ingredient is released at pH 7.4 within 4 hours.

[0046] In one embodiment, when the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention is stored for 1 to 6 months in a long-term storage stability condition (25° C./60% RH) and an accelerated stability condition (40° C./75% RH), the content of the active ingredient remains substantially the same, and there is substantially no generation of new impurities or no increase in impurities, and the dissolution pattern before and after storage is substantially the same.

[0047] Therefore, the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention can delay the dissolution of the active ingredient until it reaches a non-acidic environment in which the active ingredient (Compound I) can be rapidly dissolved, and thus the pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention can be very usefully applied to treat inflammatory bowel diseases and the like, which require the release of the active ingredient into lesions of the lower small intestine or the large intestine.

[0048] Hereinafter, the embodiments and examples of the present application will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings so that a person of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention belongs can easily practice. However, the present application can be implemented in various forms and is not limited to the embodiments and examples described herein.

[0049] Throughout the specification of the present application, unless otherwise stated, when a certain part “comprises” a certain component, it means that the part can further comprise other components, not exclude other components.

[0050] Throughout the specification of the present application, the term “about” means that the number or range is not limited to the exact number or range in which the number or range is presented, but that the number or range includes a value around the cited number or range as understood by those of skill in the art depending on the context in which the number or range is used.

Preparation Example 1

Preparation of Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II)

[0051] ##STR00004##

[0052] The compound of Formula II above, palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine, was prepared according to the method described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/205,853, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Preparation Example 2

Preparation of Sodium Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate (Compound I)

[0053] ##STR00005##

[0054] Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine may be treated with a sodium base such as Na.sub.2CO.sub.3, NaHCO.sub.3 or NaOH and converted to sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate (Compound I).

[0055] For example, 8.6 kg of NaHCO.sub.3 was added to reactor 1, and 452 kg of water was added thereto. The NaHCO.sub.3 aqueous solution in reactor 1 was transferred to another container A, and then 45 kg of palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine was added to reactor 1. 368 kg of the solution in the container A was added to reactor 1 and stirred for 1 to 3 hours at 20 to 30° C. 82 kg of the solution in the container A was added to reactor 1 and stirred for 1 to 5 hours at 20 to 30° C. The temperature was raised to 45-55° C., and then the mixture was further stirred for 3 to 5 hours. After the reaction was completed, the resulting sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate (Compound I) was centrifuged to remove water, and then washed with 66 kg of acetone. After drying, 44.2 kg of the resulting Compound I was placed in an LDPE bag and a fiber drum and stored for further treatment.

[0056] 42.7 kg of 44.2 kg of Compound I was added to reactor 1, and 396 kg of tetrahydrofuran (THF) was added to reactor 1, and then heated to 40-50° C. to dissolve completely. The dissolved solution was filtered to remove impurities, and THF was removed under reduced pressure, and then 100 kg of THF was added again to dissolve completely at 40-50° C. 360 kg of acetone was further added and stirred at 40-50° C. for 1 to 2 hours. The temperature of the reactor was lowered to −5 to 5° C., and the obtained solid was dried under reduced pressure to obtain 37.48 kg of the final compound (sodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate (Compound I)). The image of Compound I was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The confirmed image is shown in FIG. 1, and as shown in FIG. 1, Compound I exhibited a nearly circular shape.

[0057] .sup.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 9.38 (brs, 1H), 8.13 (t, 1H, J=5.6 Hz), 7.25 (d, 1H, J=6.4 Hz), 6.87 (d, 2H, J=8.0 Hz), 6.55 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz), 4.49 (dd, 1H), 4.27 (dd, 1H), 3.90 (dd, 1H), 3.57-3.44 (m, 6H), 2.95-2.78 (m, 2H), 2.20 (m, 2H), 2.08-1.7 (m, 8H), 1.44 (m, 2H), 1.42 (s, 24H), 0.85 (t, 3H, J=6.4 Hz); LCMS (m/z) 671.5 (MH.sup.+ of free form, palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine).

Preparation Example 3

Preparation of Disodium Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate

[0058] ##STR00006##

[0059] In the method for preparing Compound I, an excess of NaOH (for example; 4 equivalents) was added to prepare disodium palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate. However, it was confirmed that since it was very hygroscopic, it could not be maintained in the form of the solid powder.

Test Example 1

Solubility of Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II)

[0060] The solubility was tested in various solvents for palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II). The solubility test was performed by manual dilution combined with visual observation. The results of the experiment are shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Solubility Results at Room Temperature Solubility Solubility Solvent (mg/mL) Solvent (mg/mL) Methanol 1-5 Heptane <1 Ethanol <1 Cyclohexane <1 Isopropyl Alcohol <1 1,4-dioxane <1 1-Butanol <1 DMSO 10-25 Acetonitrile <1 DMF 1-5 Acetone <1 N-methyl pyrrolidone 1-5 Methyl Ethyl Ketone <1 Water <1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone <1 Methanol-H.sub.2O (1:1) <1 Ethyl Acetate <1 Methanol-H.sub.2O (3:1) <1 Isopropyl Acetate <1 Ethanol-H.sub.2O (1:1) <1 Methyl t-Butyl Ether <1 Ethanol-H.sub.2O (3:1) <1 Tetrahydrofuran <1 ACN-H.sub.2O (1:1) <1 2-Methyl Tetrahydrofuran <1 Acetone-H.sub.2O (1:2) <1 Toluene <1 THF-H.sub.2O (1:1) 1-5

[0061] As shown in Table 1 above, it was confirmed that palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II) had low solubility in most organic solvents and water (<1 mg/mL).

Test Example 2

Measurement of Solubility of Micronized Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II)

[0062] In order to increase the solubility of palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II) in water, Compound II was micronized to have a particle size of less than 5 μm, and its solubility was measured.

[0063] The solubility was measured by the following method. An appropriate amount of sample was placed in a 1.5 mL HPLC vial, and then 1.0 mL of solvent was added. The HPLC vial was shaken at 25° C. at a speed of 700 rpm, then the slurry was filtered, and the filtrate was analyzed by HPLC. In this case, the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 2 μg/mL.

[0064] The results of measuring the solubility are shown in Table 2 below.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Name Solvent Solubility (mg/mL) Compound II Water <LOQ SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.01 Micronized Compound II Water <LOQ (Particle Size <5 μm) SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.05 Limit of Quantification (LOQ) = 2 μg/mL. SGF: Simulated Gastric Fluid FaSSIF: Fasted State Simulated Intestinal Fluid

[0065] As shown in Table 2 above, it was confirmed that there was no significant difference in the solubility between Compound II and the micronized Compound II.

Test Example 3

Measurement of Solubility of Amorphous Solid Dispersion Form of Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II)

[0066] In order to increase the solubility of palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II) in water, the amorphous solid dispersions of Compound II were prepared, and then the solubility was measured.

[0067] The measurement results are shown in Tables 3 and 4 below.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Name Media Solubility (mg/mL) Compound II: Compound II: Water <LOQ Kollidon Kollidon VA64 SGF (pH =1.2) <LOQ VA64 = 1:1 1:1 Simple Mixture FaSSIF 0.01 Amorphous Solid Water <LOQ Dispersion SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.34 Compound II: Compound II: Water <LOQ Kollidon Kollidon VA64 SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ VA64 = 1:2 1:2 Simple Mixture FaSSIF 0.01 Amorphous Solid Water <LOQ Dispersion SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.06 Compound II: Compound II: Water <LOQ PVP K30 = 1:1 PVP K30 SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ 1:1 Simple Mixture FaSSIF 0.01 Amorphous Solid Water <LOQ Dispersion SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.09 Compound II: Compound II: Water <LOQ PVP K30 = 1:2 PVP K30 SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ 1:2 Simple Mixture FaSSIF <LOQ Amorphous Solid Water <LOQ Dispersion SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.12 Limit of Quantification (LOQ) = 2 μg/mL.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Name Media Solubility (mg/mL) Compound II: Compound II: Water <LOQ HPMC HPMC E3 = SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ E3 = 1:1 1:1 Simple Mixture FaSSIF 0.01 Amorphous Solid Water <LOQ Dispersion SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.35 Compound II: Compound II: Water <LOQ HPMC HPMC E3 = SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ E3 = 1:2 1:2 Simple Mixture FaSSIF 0.01 Amorphous Solid Water <LOQ Dispersion SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.55 Compound II: Compound II: Water <LOQ HPMC HPMC ASMG = SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ ASMG = 1:1 1:1 Simple Mixture FaSSIF <LOQ Amorphous Solid Water <LOQ Dispersion SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.01 Compound II: Compound II: Water <LOQ HPMC HPMC ASMG = SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ ASMG = 1:2 1:2 Simple Mixture FaSSIF <LOQ Amorphous Solid Water <LOQ Dispersion SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF <LOQ Limit of Quantification (LOQ) = 2 μg/mL.

[0068] As shown in Tables 3 and 4 above, it was confirmed that there was no significant difference in the solubility between the simple mixture and the solid dispersion.

Test Example 4

Measurement of Solubility of Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II) to which Surfactant is Added

[0069] In order to increase the solubility of palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosine (Compound II) in water, a surfactant such as sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) was added, and the solubility was measured. The results of measuring the solubility are shown in Table 5 below.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Name Media Solubility (mg/mL) Compound II 1% SLS Water 0.47 SGF (pH = 1.2) 0.09 FaSSIF 1.99 5% SLS Water 1.92 SGF (pH = 1.2) 0.38 FaSSIF 5.09 1% Poloxamer 188 Water <LOQ SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.01 5% Poloxamer 188 Water <LOQ SGF (pH = 1.2) <LOQ FaSSIF 0.01 Limit of Quantification (LOQ) = 2 μg/mL.

[0070] As shown in Table 5 above, it was confirmed that there was no significant increase in the solubility when the surfactant was added.

Test Example 5

Solubility of Sodium Palmitoyl-L-prolyl-L-prolyl-glycyl-L-tyrosinate Salt (Compound I) and Other Salts

[0071] The solubility was tested at room temperature in various solvents for Compound I. In addition, the solubility test was performed by manual dilution combined with visual observation. Specifically, 2 mg of Compound I was added to a 1.5 mL HPLC vial and continuously stirred at ambient temperature while the solvent was gradually added. The results of measuring the solubility are shown in Table 6 below.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Solvent Solubility (mg/mL) Methanol >100 Ethanol   50-100 Isopropyl alcohol   50-100 1-Butanol   50-100 Acetonitrile <1 Acetone <1 Methyl Ethyl Ketone   3.3-5.0 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone   1.2-1.4 Ethyl Acetate <1 Isopropyl Acetate <1 Methyl t-Butyl Ether <1 Tetrahydrofuran >100 2-Methyl Tetrahydrofuran >100 Toluene   50-100 Heptane <1 Cyclohexane <1 1,4-Dioxane 33.3-50 DMSO   50-100 DMF    20-33.3 N-Methyl pyrrolidone   50-100 Water >100 Methanol-H.sub.2O (1:1) >100 Methanol-H.sub.2O (3:1) >100 Ethanol-H.sub.2O (1:1)   50-100 Ethanol-H.sub.2O (3:1)   50-100 Acetonitrile-H.sub.2O (1:1)   50-100 Acetone-H.sub.2O (1:2)   50-100 Tetrahydrofuran-H.sub.2O (1:1)   50-100

[0072] As shown in Table 6 above, it was confirmed that the water solubility of Compound I was higher by tens of thousands of times or more compared to that of Compound II in an acid form. Specifically, it was confirmed that the solubility of Compound II was lower than the limit of quantification (LOQ, 2 μg/mL), but the solubility of Compound I was 100 mg/mL or more.

[0073] In addition to Compound I, various salts of the compound were prepared from Compound II, and the solubility in water was measured, and the results are shown in Table 7 below.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Salt Form of Compound II Solubility (mg/mL) Calcium Salt <1 Magnesium Salt <1 Zinc Salt <1 Meglumine Salt <10 Arginine Salt <10

[0074] As shown in Table 7 above, the various salts of Compound II were prepared, but it was confirmed that they all exhibited a low solubility of 10 mg/mL or less in water. As a result, it can be seen that the sodium salt form (Compound I) of Compound II disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2017/0008924 has the excellent pharmaceutical properties and is therefore most suitable for development as a medicament.

[0075] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail through the additional experiments on various dosage forms comprising Compound I as an active ingredient, but the following examples are provided only for the purpose of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.

[0076] Dissolution Test

[0077] The dissolution test was performed by the USP type II paddle method in a condition of 37° C., 100 rpm. Specifically, the dissolution tests were performed in an acidic environment by using 0.1 N HCl, in an acidic environment of pH 6.0 by adding a buffer solution (the fine adjustment of pH was performed by 5 N HCl), and in a neutral environment of pH 7.4, respectively.

[0078] The method for preparing the buffer solution and a 0.1 N HCl solution is as follows.

[0079] Preparation of a 0.1 N HCl solution: Based on the preparation of 24 L of a solution, 198 mL of hydrochloric acid was added to 24 L of purified water and mixed well.

[0080] Preparation of a buffer solution: Based on the preparation of 6 L of a solution, 255.44 g of sodium phosphate tribasic dodecahydrates (Na.sub.3PO.sub.4.12H.sub.2O) was added to 6 L of purified water and mixed well. The concentration of this buffer solution is 112 mM.

[0081] Stability Test

[0082] After the dosage forms prepared in the present invention were stored for a period of time in a long-term storage stability condition (25° C./60% RH) or an accelerated stability condition (40° C./75% RH), the content of individual impurities or total impurities was measured. The impurities were measured using a validated HPLC analysis method. The specific conditions are as follows.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Chromatography Condition Column Zorbax SB-C8 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) Column Temperature 50° C. Autosampler Temperature Ambient (20° C.) Injection Volume 10 μl (Needle Wash: 50% Methanol) Mobile Phase A 0.2% Trifluoroacetic Acid in Water Mobile Phase B 0.2% Trifluoroacetic Acid in Acetonitrile Mobile Mobile Gradient Time (min) Phase A (%) Phase B (%) 0.0 90 10 5.0 30 70 20.0 5 95 20.1 90 10 30.0 90 10 Flow rate    1.0 mL/min Detection Wavelength 220 nm Runtime    30 minutes

Example 1

Preparation of Enteric Coated Granules

[0083] Compound I was enteric coated with Eudragit L100/S100 (Eudragit L100:S100=1:1 (w/w)), talc, and triethyl citrate using anhydrous ethanol as a solvent. The specific composition of the granules is shown in Table 9 below.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) Compound I 70 Eudragit L100/S100 19 Talc 9 Triethyl Citrate 2 Anhydrous Ethanol (—)* Sum 100 *Removed during the process

[0084] For the enteric coated granules of Example 1, the dissolution test of Compound I was performed in an acidic environment of pH 6.0 and in a neutral environment of pH 7.4. The dissolution test results are shown in Table 10.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Dissolution Rate of Example 1 (%) Environment: 900 ml Buffer Environment: 900 ml Buffer pH 6.0 pH 7.4 Time (hr) Paddles: 100 rpm Paddles: 100 rpm 1 33 61 2 1 61 4 0 60

[0085] As shown in Table 10 above, the granules of Example 1 exhibited a dissolution rate of 33% after 1 hour in an acidic environment and maintained a dissolution rate of about 60% after 1 hour in a neutral environment. It was believed that the dissolution was not confirmed after 2 hours in an acidic environment, because Compound I was converted to Compound II (water solubility <2 μg/mL) in an acidic environment while the surface of the granules was gradually dissolved.

Examples 2 and 3

[0086] Preparation of Granules to which Seal Coating and Enteric Coating are Applied

[0087] Compound I was seal coated with Opadry Clear or Opadry AMB using water as a solvent and then enteric coated with Eudragit FS 30D/Plasacryl T20. The specific composition of the granules is shown in Table 11 below.

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Weight Ratio (%) Item Ingredient Example 2 Example 3 Active Ingredient Compound I 70 Seal Coating Opadry Clear 5 — Opadry AMB — 5 Water USP (—)* Enteric Coating Eudragit FS 30 D  22.5 Plasacryl T20  2.5 Water USP (—)* Sum 100 *Removed during the process

[0088] For the granules of Examples 2 and 3, the dissolution test of Compound I was performed in an acidic environment of pH 6.0 and in a neutral environment of pH 7.4. The dissolution test results are shown in Table 12 below.

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Dissolution Rate of Example 2 (%) Dissolution Rate of Example 3 (%) Environment: 900 Environment: 900 Environment: 900 Environment: 900 Time ml Buffer pH 6.0 ml Buffer pH 7.4 ml Buffer pH 6.0 ml Buffer pH 7.4 (hr) Paddles: 100 rpm Paddles: 100 rpm Paddles: 100 rpm Paddles: 100 rpm 1 59 65 65 69 2 70 65 62 69 4 66 65 1 69

[0089] As shown in Table 12 above, the granules of Examples 2 and 3 exhibited a dissolution rate of about 60% after 1 hour in an acidic environment. In addition, similar to Example 1, a phenomenon in which the detection amount of Compound I was partially decreased over time in an acidic environment was observed.

Example 4

Preparation of Direct Compression Tablet

[0090] 200 mg of Compound I was co-milled with microcrystalline cellulose and crospovidone and then compressed with magnesium stearate to prepare the tablets. The specific composition of the tablets is shown in Table 13.

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) mg/unit Compound I 50 200 Microcrystalline Cellulose 44 176 Crospovidone 5 20 Magnesium Stearate 1 4 Sum 100 400

Example 5

Preparation of Direct Compression Tablet

[0091] 200 mg of Compound I was dry blended with Eudragit L100, silicified microcrystalline cellulose and magnesium stearate and then compressed to prepare the tablets. The specific composition of the tablets is shown in Table 14.

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) mg/unit Compound I 40 200 Eudragit L 100 30 150 Silicified Microcrystalline Cellulose 29 145 Magnesium Stearate 1 5 Sum 100 500

[0092] For the tablets of Example 5, the dissolution test of Compound I was performed in an acidic environment of pH 6.0 and in a neutral environment of pH 7.4. The dissolution test results are shown in Table 15 below.

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Dissolution Rate of Example 5 (%) Environment: 900 ml Buffer Environment: 900 ml Buffer pH 6.0 pH 7.4 Time (hr) Paddles: 100 rpm Paddles: 100 rpm 1 1 55 2 0 69 4 0 95

[0093] As shown in Table 15 above, for the tablets of Example 5, it was confirmed that Compound I was not substantially dissolved in an acidic environment, and the dissolution of Compound I was gradually increased in a neutral environment, and the dissolution rate of Compound I was 95% after 4 hours.

Examples 6 and 7

Preparation of Direct Compression Tablet

[0094] 25 mg or 200 mg of Compound I was dry blended with Eudragit S100, silicified microcrystalline cellulose and magnesium stearate and then compressed to prepare the tablets. The specific composition of the tablets is shown in Table 16.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Weight Ratio mg/unit Ingredient (%) Example 6 Example 7 Compound I 40 25.0 200 Eudragit S100 20 12.5 100 Silicified Microcrystalline Cellulose 39 24.4 195 Magnesium Stearate 1 0.6 5 Sum 100 62.5 500

[0095] After the tablets of Examples 6 and 7 were stored for 1 month in an accelerated stability (40° C./75% RH) condition, the amount of impurities produced and the dissolution rate (%) before and after storage were compared. The results of the experiment are shown in Table 17.

TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Example 6 Example 7 Accelerated Condition T = 0 T = 1 month T = 0 T = 1 month Storage Period (40° C./75% RH) Individual Impurities Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected (<0.1%) (<0.1%) (<0.1%) (<0.1%) Total Impurities Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected Not Detected (<0.1%) (<0.1%) (<0.1%) (<0.1%) Dissolution Environment Hour Acidic Environment 2 All tablets were partially All tablets were partially (500 ml 0.1N HCl) disintegrated disintegrated After Dissolving 1 60 58 47 48 for 2 Hours in 2 83 84 101 103 Acidic Environment, 4 99 96 105 103 Neutral Environment 6 96 95 105 103 (Na.sub.3PO.sub.4, pH 7.4)

[0096] As shown in Table 17 above, it was confirmed that the impurities were not generated in both Examples 6 and 7. In addition, it was confirmed that all tablets were partially disintegrated in an acidic environment for 2 hours, and the dissolution progressed in a neutral environment.

[0097] It was confirmed that the dissolution rates before and after storage in an accelerated condition were substantially the same. Therefore, the tablets have excellent storage stability, and have a high dissolution rate of Compound I in an environment of the lower small intestine or the large intestine.

Example 8

[0098] Preparation of Tablets to which Seal Coating and Enteric Coating are Applied

[0099] 200 mg of Compound I was dry blended with the additives and then compressed to prepare the tablets. Seal coating was first performed in an aqueous solution using Opadry clear (HPMC/HPC) on the prepared tablets, and enteric coating was performed in an aqueous solution using Eudragit FS 30D and Plasacryl T20. The specific composition of the tablets is shown in Table 18.

TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 Weight Ratio Item Ingredient (%) mg/unit Core Compound I 40 200 HPMC 20 100 Mannitol 20 100 Microcrystalline Cellulose 15 75 Sodium Croscarmellose 4 20 Magnesium Stearate 1 5 Core Sum 100 500 Seal Coating Opadry clear — 25 Water USP — (—)* Enteric Coating Eudragit FS 30 D — 119 Plasacryl T20 — 12 Water USP — (—)* Total Weight of Tablet 656 *Removed during the process

Example 9

Preparation of Capsules

[0100] 200 mg of Compound I, polyethylene oxide, and crospovidone were mixed by V-blender for 3 minutes, co-milled, and then talc was added, and mixed by V-blender for 2 minutes again. The final mixture was filled into HPMC capsules. The specific composition of the capsules is shown in Table 19.

TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 19 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) mg/unit Compound I 50 200 Polyethylene Oxide 44 176 Crospovidone 5  20 Talc 1   4 Sum 100 400 HPMC Capsule “0” —   96* Capsule Weight — 496 *Average weight of 10 empty capsules

Example 10

Preparation of Capsules

[0101] Compound I (50%) and HPMC (50%) were dissolved using a methanol/dichloromethane mixed solvent. The solution was co-precipitated using a spray dryer and filled into HPMC capsules to complete enteric formulations. The specific composition of the capsules is shown in Tables 20 and 21 below.

TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 20 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) Compound I 50 HPMC 50 Methanol/Dichloromethane (900) * Mixed Solvent (1:1 w/w) Sum 100 * Removed during the process

TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 21 Ingredient mg/unit Product of Table 20 (Compound I:HPMC = 1:1) 400 HPMC Capsule “0”  96* Capsule Weight 496 *Average weight of 10 empty capsules

Example 11

Preparation of Capsules

[0102] 200 mg of Compound I, magnesium aluminometasilicate, polyoxyglyceride, and microcrystalline cellulose were wet granulated with anhydrous ethanol and co-milled. It was lubricated with sodium starch glycolate and magnesium stearate and then filled into HPMC capsules of size 0. The specific composition of the capsules is shown in Table 22.

TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 22 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) mg/unit Compound I 40 200 Polyoxyglyceride 21 104 Magnesium Aluminometasilicate 21 104 Microcrystalline Cellulose 15  75 Sodium starch Glycolate  3  13 Magnesium Stearate  1  4 Anhydrous Ethanol   (35) * (—)* Sum 100  500 HPMC Capsule “0” —   96** Capsule Weight — 596 *Removed during the process; **Average weight of 10 empty capsules

Example 12

[0103] Preparation of Capsules Filled with Enteric Coated Granules

[0104] Compound I was enteric coated with Eudragit FS 30D/Plasacryl T20 using a VFC Lab Micro fluid bed and using water as a solvent (Table 23). The enteric coated granules were mixed with magnesium stearate in a ratio of 99.5:0.5 (w/w) and filled into HPMC size 2 capsules to prepare the capsules. The specific composition of the capsules is shown in Tables 23 and 24.

TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 23 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) Compound I 75 Eudragit FS 30D 22.5 Plasacryl T20 2.5 Water USP (—)* Sum 100 *Removed during the process

TABLE-US-00024 TABLE 24 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) mg/capsule Enteric Coated Granule of Table 23 99.5 268 Magnesium Stearate  0.5   1.3 Sum 100   269 HPMC Capsule “2” —  61* Capsule Weight — 330 *Average weight of 10 empty capsules

Examples 13 and 14

[0105] Preparation of Capsules Filled with Enteric Coated Granules

[0106] 25 mg or 200 mg of Compound I was enteric coated directly with Eudragit L100/S100 (Eudragit L100:S100=1:1 (w/w)), triethyl citrate (TEC), talc, and anhydrous ethanol. The enteric coated granules were filled into HPMC capsules. The specific composition of the capsules is shown in Table 25.

TABLE-US-00025 TABLE 25 mg/unit Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) Example 13 Example 14 Compound I 60 25 200 Eudragit L100/S100 (1/1), TEC, Talc 40 17 133 Anhydrous Ethanol — (—)* (—)* Sum 100 42 333 HPMC Capsule —  48**   75*** Capsule Weight 90 408 *Removed during the process **Average weight of 10 empty capsules “Size 3”; ***Average weight of 10 empty capsules “Size 1”

[0107] The capsules filled with the enteric coated granules (Example 13) were tested for the stability and dissolution. The results of the experiment are shown in Table 26 below.

TABLE-US-00026 TABLE 26 Accelerated Condition Storage Period Example 13 Example 14 (40° C./75% RH) T = 0 T = 1 month T = 0 T = 1 month Total Impurities (%) 0.55 0.62 0.51 0.61 Dissolution Environment Hour Acidic Environment 2 All capsules All capsules All capsules All capsules (500 ml 0.1 N were partially were partially were were swellen HCl) disintegrated disintegrated After Dissolving 1 105 100 80 84 for 2 Hours in 2 107 104 91 95 Acidic Environment, 4 107 104 104 102 Neutral Environment 6 107 103 105 104 (Na.sub.3PO.sub.4, pH 7.4)

[0108] As shown in Table 26 above, it was confirmed that Compound I was stable for 1 month in an accelerated stability condition (40° C./75% RH). In addition, it was confirmed that there was almost no generation or increase of impurities.

[0109] As a result of the dissolution test, it was confirmed that when the enteric capsules were exposed to a 0.1 N HCl dissolution solution for 2 hours, all the capsules were partially disintegrated or swellen. In addition, it was confirmed that, in a dissolution solution adjusted to pH 7.4 using a sodium phosphate buffer (Na.sub.3PO.sub.4 buffer), Compound I was released within 1 hour in substantially all capsules.

[0110] Therefore, it can be seen that the capsule can delay the release of Compound I until it reaches a non-acidic environment in which Compound I can be rapidly released. This property can be very useful in the dosage form of therapeutic agents for inflammatory bowel diseases, which require the release of the active ingredient such as Compound I into lesions of the lower small intestine or the large intestine.

Examples 15 and 16

[0111] Preparation of Capsules Filled with Enteric Coated Granules

[0112] 25 mg or 200 mg of Compound I was enteric coated granulated by a high-shear granulation method. The granulation was performed at 50° C. using anhydrous ethanol, and the granules were dried in an oven and then filled into HPMC capsules. The specific composition of the capsules is shown in Table 27.

TABLE-US-00027 TABLE 27 mg/unit Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) Example 15 Example 16 Compound I 75 25 200 Eudragit S 100 20  7  53 HPMC  4  1  11 Anhydrous Ethanol  (28) * (—)* (—)* Magnesium Stearate  1  0.3  3 Sum 100  33 267 HPMC Capsule —  48**   75*** Capsule Weight 81 342 *Removed during the process **Average weight of 10 empty capsules “Size 3”; ***Average weight of 10 empty capsules “Size 1”

Example 17

[0113] Preparation of Capsules to which Enteric Coating is Applied

[0114] 200 mg of Compound I was first filled into HPMC size 2 capsules, and the capsules were enteric coated with Eudragit FS 30D and Plasacryl T20 in aqueous solution. The composition of the capsules according to the present method is shown in Table 28.

TABLE-US-00028 TABLE 28 Item Ingredient mg/unit Active Ingredient Compound I 200 Capsule HPMC Capsule “2”  61* Core Sum 261 Enteric Coating Eudragit FS 30D  59 Plasacryl T20  6 Water USP (—)** Total Sum 326 *Average weight of 10 empty capsules; **Removed during the process

[0115] For the granules of Example 17, the dissolution test of Compound I was performed in an acidic environment of pH 6.0 and in a neutral environment of pH 7.4. The results are shown in Table 29.

TABLE-US-00029 TABLE 29 Dissolution Rate of Example 17 (%) Environment: 900 ml Buffer pH 6.0 Environment: 900 ml Buffer pH 7.4 Time (hr) Paddles: 100 rpm Paddles: 100 rpm 1 0 0 2 0 91 4 0 96

[0116] As shown in Table 29, in the capsules of Example 17, the dissolution of Compound I did not substantially occur in an acidic environment, and the dissolution of Compound I was gradually increased in a neutral environment, resulting in a dissolution rate of Compound I of 96% after 4 hours.

Examples 18 and 19

[0117] Preparation of Capsules to which Enteric Coating is Applied

[0118] 25 mg or 200 mg of Compound I was mixed with magnesium stearate in a weight ratio of 99:1 (Compound I:magnesium stearate), and the mixture was filled into HPMC capsules and then enteric coated with Eudragit L100/S100 (Eudragit L100:S100=1:1 (w/w)), triethyl citrate (TEC), and talc using anhydrous ethanol in a fluid bed. The composition of the capsules according to the present method is shown in Table 30.

TABLE-US-00030 TABLE 30 mg/unit Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) Example 18 Example 19 Compound I 99 25 200 Magnesium Stearate 1   0.3    2.4 HPMC Capsule —  48*  48* Core Sum 100 73 250 Eudragit L100/S100 —  70**   70** (1:1), TEC, Talc Capsule Weight 143  320 *Average weight of 10 empty capsules **Solid ingredients consisting of 48 mg of Eudragit L/S100 and 22 mg of TEC/talc

[0119] The enteric coated capsules (Examples 18 and 19) were tested for the stability and dissolution. The results are shown in Table 31.

TABLE-US-00031 TABLE 31 Accelerated Condition Storage Period Example 18 Example 19 (40° C./75% RH) T = 0 T = 1 month T = 0 T = 1 month Total Impurities (%) 0.64 0.66 0.58 0.66 Dissolution Environment Hour Acidic Environment 2 No change in capsule No change in capsule (500 ml 0.1 N HCl) After Dissolving 1 97 97 101 72 for 2 Hours in 2 99 99 106 105 Acidic Environment, 4 99 99 106 105 Neutral 6 99 99 106 106 Environment (Na.sub.3PO.sub.4, pH 7.4)

[0120] As shown in Table 31 above, it was confirmed that Compound I was stable for 1 month in an accelerated stability condition (40° C./75% RH), and there was almost no generation or increase of impurities.

[0121] As a result of the dissolution test, it was confirmed that when the enteric coated capsules were exposed to a 0.1 N HCl dissolution solution for 2 hours, all the capsules were stable. It was confirmed that, in a dissolution solution adjusted to pH 7.4 using a sodium phosphate buffer (Na.sub.3PO.sub.4 buffer), Compound I was dissolved from substantially all capsules. In addition, Compound I was dissolved within 1 hour from a plurality of capsules.

[0122] In an accelerated stability condition, the dissolution results before and after storage were substantially the same.

Example 20

[0123] Preparation of Capsules to which Enteric Coating is Applied

[0124] 200 mg of Compound I was blended with magnesium stearate and then filled into HPMC capsules. The filled HPMC capsules were enteric coated with coating ingredients of Table 32 below using a fluid bed. The composition of the capsules according to the present method is shown in Table 33.

TABLE-US-00032 TABLE 32 Coating Suspension Coating Dry Mixture Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) Weight Ratio (%) Eudragit L100/S100 (1:1) 9.1 69 Triethyl Citrate 0.7 5 Talc 3.4 26 Anhydrous Ethanol 86.8 — Sum 100 100

TABLE-US-00033 TABLE 33 Ingredient Weight Ratio (%) mg/unit Compound I 99 200 Magnesium Stearate 1  2 Sum 100 202 HPMC Capsule —  62* Coating Ingredients of Table 32 —  84 Capsule Weight 348 * Average weight of 10 empty capsules

[0125] For the enteric coated capsules (Example 20), the dissolution test was performed, and the results are shown in Table 34 below.

TABLE-US-00034 TABLE 34 Dissolution Environment Hour Dissolution Rate of Example 20 (%) Acidic Environment 2 No change in capsule (500 ml 0.1 N HCl) After Dissolving for 2 1 44 Hours in Acidic 2 102 Environment, Neutral 4 102 Environment 6 102 (Na.sub.3PO.sub.4, pH 7.4)

[0126] As shown in Table 34 above, it was confirmed that when the enteric capsules were exposed to a 0.1 N HCl dissolution solution for 2 hours, there was no change in all the capsules, whereas Compound I was dissolved in a neutral environment.

Examples 21 to 23

[0127] Preparation of Capsules to which Enteric Coating is Applied

[0128] Compound I was mixed with Eudragit S100 and Pharmacoat Hypromellose 606 (HPMC). This mixture was subjected to fluid bed granulation processing with top spray nozzles using anhydrous ethanol as a granulating solvent (granulating liquid) to prepare the granules. The resulting granules were dried, then mixed with magnesium stearate, and filled into HPMC capsules. The composition of the capsules according to the present method is shown in Table 35.

TABLE-US-00035 TABLE 35 mg/unit Ingredient Weight ratio (%) Example 21 Example 22 Example 23 Compound I 75.0 25.0 100.0 200.0 Eudragit S100 20.0 6.67 26.7 53.3 HPMC 4.0 1.33 5.33 10.7 (Hypromellose 606) Magnesium Stearate 1.0 0.33 1.33 2.67 Anhydrous Ethanol Removed during process HPMC Capsule — 1 Unit Sum (Excluding Capsule 100 33.3 133.3 266.7 Weight)

[0129] The enteric coated capsules (Examples 21 to 23) were tested for the stability and dissolution. The results are shown in Tables 36 and 37.

TABLE-US-00036 TABLE 36 Results of Stability and Dissolution in Long-Term Storage Stability Condition (25°C./ 60% RH) Example 21 Example 22 Example 23 Storage Period (25° C./60% RH) T = 6 T = 6 T = 6 T = 0 months T = 0 months T = 0 months Individual Impurities RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: (RRT) 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 RRT 0.97: RRT 0.97: RRT 0.97: RRT 0.97: RRT 0.97: RRT 0.97: 0 <0.05 0 <0.05 0 <0.05 RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: 0.17 0.14 0.17 0.15 0.16 0.14 Total Impurities (%) 0.38 0.34 0.39 0.36 0.37 0.35 Dissolution Environment Hour Acidic 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environment (500 ml 0.1 N HCl) Na.sub.3PO.sub.4•12H.sub.2O 2.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 Buffer pH 3.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6.0 Na.sub.3PO.sub.4•12H.sub.2O 3.5 90 83 61 54 47 45 Buffer pH 4.0 93 96 95 90 96 91 7.4 5.0 NA 97 NA 99 NA 98

TABLE-US-00037 TABLE 37 Results of Stability and Dissolution in Accelerated Stability Condition (40° C./75% RH) Example 21 Example 22 Example 23 Storage Period (40° C./75% RH) T = 6 T = 6 T = 6 T = 0 months T = 0 months T = 0 months Individual Impurities RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: RRT 0.86: (RRT) 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.08 0.09 0.08 RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: RRT 0.97: RRT 0.97: RRT 0.97: RRT 0.97: 0.12 0.14 0 <0.05 0 0.05 RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: RRT 1.08: 0.17 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: RRT 1.17: 0.17 0.15 0.16 0.16 Total Impurities (%) 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.35 0.37 0.41 Dissolution Environment Hour Acidic 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environment (500 ml 0.1 N HCl) Na3PO4•12H2O 2.5 1 0 0 0 0 1 Buffer pH 3.0 1 1 0 0 0 2 6.0 Na3PO4•12H2O 3.5 90 77 61 65 47 48 Buffer pH 4.0 93 93 95 97 96 90 7.4 5.0 NA 95 NA 99 NA 99

[0130] As shown in Tables 36 and 37 above, it was confirmed that Compound I was stable for 6 months in a long-term storage stability condition (25° C./60% RH) and an accelerated stability condition (40° C./75% RH), and there was no generation of impurities or increase in impurities.

[0131] As a result of the dissolution test, it was confirmed that Compound I was not substantially dissolved in an acidic environment, and Compound I was dissolved in a neutral environment, and the dissolution results before and after storage were substantially the same.

[0132] Eventually, the enteric coated capsule of the present invention can delay the dissolution of Compound I until it reaches a non-acidic environment in which Compound I can be rapidly released, and thus the enteric coated capsule of the present invention is very useful as a dosage form of therapeutic agents for inflammatory bowel diseases, which require the release of the active ingredient such as Compound I into lesions of the lower small intestine or the large intestine.