LITHIUM NICKEL MANGANESE COBALT COMPOSITE OXIDE AS A POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR RECHARGEABLE LITHIUM ION BATTERIES

Abstract

A positive electrode active material powder suitable for lithium-ion batteries, comprising lithium transition metal-based oxide particles, said particles comprising a core and a surface layer, said surface layer being on top of said core, said particles comprising the elements: Li, a metal M′ and oxygen, wherein the metal M′ has a formula: M′=(Ni.sub.z(Ni.sub.0.5Mn.sub.0.5).sub.yCo.sub.x).sub.1-kA.sub.k, wherein A is a dopant, 0.60≤z≤0.86, 0.05≤y≤0.20, 0.05≤x≤0.20, x+y+z+k=1, and k≤0.01, said positive electrode active material powder having a median particle size D50 ranging from 5 μm to 15 μm and a surface layer thickness ranging from 10 nm to 200 nm,

said surface layer comprising: sulfur in a content superior or equal to 0.150 wt % and inferior or equal to 0.375 wt % with respect to the total weight of the positive electrode active material powder, and aluminum in a content superior or equal to 0.05 wt % and inferior or equal to 0.15 wt % with respect to the total weight of the positive electrode active material powder,
said surface layer of lithium transition metal-based oxide particles comprising a LiAlO.sub.2 phase and an LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2 phase with M″ comprising: Ni, Mn, and Co, said LiAlO.sub.2 phase being present in the surface layer in a content superior or equal to 0.10 at % and inferior or equal to 0.30 at % with respect to the total atomic content of M′ in the positive electrode active material powder, said LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2 phase being present in the surface layer in a content inferior to 0.14 at % with respect to the total atomic content of M′ in the positive electrode active material powder.

Claims

1-16. (canceled)

17. A positive electrode active material powder suitable for lithium-ion batteries, comprising lithium transition metal-based oxide particles, said particles comprising a core and a surface layer, said surface layer being on top of said core, said particles comprising the elements: Li, a metal M′ and oxygen, wherein the metal M′ has a formula: M′=(Ni.sub.zMn.sub.yCo.sub.x).sub.1-kA.sub.k, wherein A is a dopant, 0.60≤z<0.86, 0.05≤x≤0.20, x+y+z+k=1, and k≤0.01, said positive electrode active material powder having a median particle size D50 ranging from 5 μm to 15 μm and a surface layer thickness ranging from 10 nm to 200 nm, said surface layer comprising: sulfur in a content superior or equal to 0.150 wt % and inferior or equal to 0.375 wt % with respect to the total weight of the positive electrode active material powder, and aluminum in a content superior or equal to 0.05 wt % and inferior or equal to 0.15 wt % with respect to the total weight of the positive electrode active material powder, said surface layer of lithium transition metal-based oxide particles comprising a LiAlO.sub.2 phase and an LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2 phase with M″ comprising: Ni, Mn, and Co, said LiAlO.sub.2 phase being present in the surface layer in a content superior or equal to 0.10 at % and inferior or equal to 0.30 at % with respect to the total atomic content of M′ in the positive electrode active material powder, said LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2 phase being present in the surface layer in a content inferior to 0.14 at % with respect to the total atomic content of M′ in the positive electrode active material powder.

18. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, wherein said particles comprises the elements: Li, M′ and oxygen, wherein M′ has a formula: M′=Ni.sub.zMn.sub.yCo.sub.xA.sub.k, wherein A is a dopant, 0.70≤z≤0.86, 0.05≤y≤0.20, 0.05≤x≤0.20, x+y+z+k=1, and k≤0.01.

19. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, wherein said lithium transition metal-based oxide particles have an Al surface coverage A1/A2 that is superior or equal to 100, wherein A1 is an atomic ratio Al/(Ni+Mn+Co+Al+S) of the elements Al, Ni, Mn, Co, and S contained in the surface layer, said atomic ratio Al being obtained by XPS spectrum analysis and wherein A2 is an atomic ratio Al/(Ni+Mn+Co+Al+S) obtained by ICP.

20. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, having a carbon content of less than 200 ppm.

21. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, having a Li/(Ni+Mn+Co+A) atomic ratio or a Li/(Ni+Mn+Co+A+Al) atomic ratio superior or equal to 0.96 and inferior or equal to 1.05.

22. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 19, wherein said surface layer exhibits an Al2p peak with a maximum peak intensity in the binding energies range from 73.0±0.2 eV to 74.5±0.2 eV, said intensity being obtained by XPS spectrum analysis.

23. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, wherein said surface layer of lithium transition metal-based oxide particles have sulfate ion (SO.sub.4.sup.2−) in a content superior or equal to 4500 ppm and inferior or equal to 11250 ppm.

24. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, wherein said lithium transition metal-based oxide particles have a sulfate ion surface coverage S1/S2 that is superior to 0.85 and inferior or equal to 1.00, wherein S1 is an amount of sulfate ion contained in the surface layer, and wherein S2 is a total amount of sulfate ion in the particles.

25. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, having a general formula: Li.sub.1+a′((Ni.sub.z′M.sub.y′Co.sub.x′Al.sub.vS.sub.w).sub.1-kA.sub.k).sub.1-aO.sub.2, wherein only A is a dopant, 0.60≤z′<0.86, 0.05≤y′≤0.20, 0.05≤x′≤0.20, and x′+y′+z′+v+w+k=1, 0.0018≤v≤0.0053, 0.006≤w≤0.012, −0.05≤a′≤0.05, and k≤0.01.

26. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, wherein A comprises one or more of Al, B, S, Mg, Zr, Nb, W, Si, Ba, Sr, Ca, Zn, Cr, V, Y, or Ti, and wherein the amount of each of the elements of A is superior to 100 ppm with respect to the total weight of the positive electrode active material powder.

27. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17, wherein the thickness of the surface layer corresponds to a minimal distance D defined either as:
D (in nm)=L.sub.S1−L.sub.S2, wherein L.sub.S1 is a first point location at the center of a particle, L.sub.S2 is a second point location in a line defined between said first point location and a geometric center of said particle, wherein a content of S is measured by TEM-EDS at the second point location L.sub.S2 is superior or equal to 0 at % and inferior or equal to 5.0 at % of a content of S measured at the first point location, said second content of S (S.sub.2) being defined as:
S.sub.2 (in at %)=S.sub.3±0.1 at %, S.sub.3 being a content of S (in at %) at a third point location (LS.sub.3) in said line, said third point being located at any location between the geometric center of said particle and the second point location L.sub.S2.

28. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 27, wherein:
S.sub.1−S.sub.2≥10.0 at %

29. The positive electrode active material powder according to claim 27, wherein Al is present in the surface layer in a content 1 defined as: $l\left(\mathrm{mol}\%\right)={\left(\frac{\mathrm{Al}}{M^{*}}\right)}_{\mathrm{ICP}}\times \left(A{l}_{\mathrm{surface}}/A{l}_{\mathrm{total}}\right)$ with: ${\left(\frac{\mathrm{Al}}{M^{*}}\right)}_{\mathrm{ICP}}$ is the atomic ratio of Al content on M* content in the powder measured by ICP, and ${\mathrm{Al}}_{\mathrm{surface}}/{\mathrm{Al}}_{\mathrm{total}}=\frac{\frac{4}{3}{\pi \left(\mathrm{Area}2\right)}^3-\frac{4}{3}{\lambda \left(\mathrm{Area}2-\mathrm{Area}1\right)}^3}{\frac{4}{3}{\pi \left(\mathrm{Area}2\right)}^3}\times 100$ wherein: Al.sub.surface is the content of Al in at % in the surface layer measured by EDS; Al.sub.total the total content of Al in at % in the particles of said powder measured by EDS; Area1 is the integral of the Al/M* content measured by cross-section-TEM-EDS over D: $\mathrm{Area}1\left(\mathrm{at}\%/\mathrm{at}\%\right)={\int }_{x=0}^{x=D}\frac{\mathrm{Al}}{M^{*}}\left(x\right),$  where: Al(x) is the atomic content of Al at a point x of a cross sectional particle measured by cross-section-TEM EDS, M*(x) is the atomic content of Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and S, at a point x of a cross sectional particle measured by cross-section-TEM EDS, and x is the distance expressed in nm measured by TEM between said first and second point locations. Area2 is the integral of the Al/M* content measured by cross-SEM EDS over a distance C: $\mathrm{Area}2\left(\mathrm{at}\%/\mathrm{at}\%\right)={\int }_{x=0}^{x=C}\frac{\mathrm{Al}}{M^{*}}\left(x\right),$  where: Al(x) is the atomic content of Al at a point x of a cross sectional particle measured by cross-section-TEM EDS, M*(x) is the atomic content of Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and S, at a point x of a cross sectional particle measured by cross-section-TEM EDS, and x is the distance expressed in nm and measured by TEM between said first point location (at x=0 nm) and the geometric center of said particle (at x=C), wherein C ranges from 2.5 μm to 7.5 μm.

30. Process for the manufacturing of a positive electrode active material according to claim 17, comprising the consecutive steps of a) preparing a lithium transition metal-based oxide compound, b) mixing said lithium transition metal-based oxide compound with a source of sulfate ion, and with water, thereby obtaining a mixture, and c) heating the mixture in an oxidizing atmosphere in a furnace at a temperature between 350° C. and less than 500° C., for a time between 1 hour and 10 hours so as to obtain the positive electrode active material powder according to the present invention.

31. A battery comprising the positive electrode active material powder according to claim 17.

32. An electric vehicle or a hybrid electric vehicle comprising the battery according to claim 31.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0088] FIG. 1A. SEM image for particles with a monolithic morphology

[0089] FIG. 1B. SEM image for particles with a polycrystalline morphology

[0090] FIG. 2. Schematic image of a cross section of positive electrode active material particle according to the invention wherein L.sub.S1 is a first point location at a periphery of the cross section of the particle, L.sub.S2 is a second point location located on an imaginary line between the geometric center of said particle and L.sub.S1. D is the thickness of the surface layer defined as the distance between L.sub.S1 and L.sub.S2 (cfr. Embodiment 9).

[0091] FIG. 3A. XPS Al peak deconvolution of EX1 before fitting process (x-axis: binding energy, y-axis: count)

[0092] FIG. 3B. XPS Al peak deconvolution of EX1 after fitting process (x-axis: binding energy, y-axis: count)

[0093] FIG. 4A. Al2p and Ni3p XPS spectra of EX1, CEX1, and CEX3 (x-axis: binding energy, y-axis: count)

[0094] FIG. 4B. Binding energy range for Al2p3 XPS peaks each for of LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2, LiAlO.sub.2, and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 phases. The vertical dashed line shows Al2p3 XPS peak position for CEX1 whereas the vertical solid line shows the Al2p3 XPS peak position for EX1.

[0095] FIG. 5: Full cell testing results of EX1, CEX1, and CEX3 at the range from 2.7V to 4.2V at 25° C. and 45° C. (x-axis: cycle number, y-axis: capacity retention)

[0096] FIG. 6A. TEM-EDS analysis result of S of EX1 (x-axis: distance where 0 is the starting point of the surface layer, y-axis: element in atomic ratio)

[0097] FIG. 6B. TEM-EDS analysis result of Al of EX1 (x-axis: distance where 0 is the starting point of the surface layer, y-axis: element in atomic ratio)

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0098] In the drawings and the following detailed description, preferred embodiments are described so as to enable the practice of the invention. Although the invention is described with reference to these specific preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to these preferred embodiments. the invention includes numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents that are apparent from consideration of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.

A) ICP Analysis

[0099] The Li, Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and S contents of the positive electrode active material powder are measured with the Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) method by using an Agillent ICP 720-ES. 2 g of product powder sample is dissolved into 10 mL of high purity hydrochloric acid in an Erlenmeyer flask. The flask is covered by a glass and heated on a hot plate at 380° C. until complete dissolution of the precursor. After being cooled to room temperature, the solution of the Erlenmeyer flask is poured into a 250 mL volumetric flask. Afterwards, the volumetric flask is filled with deionized water up to the 250 mL mark, followed by complete homogenization. An appropriate amount of solution is taken out by pipette and transferred into a 250 mL volumetric flask for the 2.sup.nd dilution, where the volumetric flask is filled with internal standard and 10% hydrochloric acid up to the 250 mL mark and then homogenized. Finally, this 50 mL solution is used for ICP measurement. The atomic ratio of Al to the total amount of Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and S (Al/(Ni+Mn+Co+Al+S) (at %)) is named A2.

[0100] The amount of sulfate ion (SO.sub.4.sup.2−) in the entire powder, which is named S2, is obtained by the below equation:

[00007]$\mathrm{Sulfate}\mathrm{ion}\left(\mathrm{ppm}\right)=S\left(\mathrm{wt}\%\right)\times \frac{M{W}_{\mathrm{SO}4}}{M{W}_S}\times \frac{10000\mathrm{ppm}}{1\mathrm{wt}\%}$

*MW.sub.SO4/MW.sub.S, molecular weight of SO.sub.4 divided by molecular weight of S, is 2.996 value.

[0101] To investigate the S content in the surface of lithium transition metal-based oxide particles according to the invention, washing and filtering processes are performed. 5 g of the positive electrode active material powder and 100 g of ultrapure water are measured out in a beaker. The electrode active material powder is dispersed in the water for 5 minutes at 25° C. using a magnetic stirrer. The dispersion is vacuum filtered, and the filtered solution is analyzed by the above ICP measurement to determine the amount of S present in the surface layer. The amount of the remaining S in the washed powder after the washing and filtering processes is defined as a dopant (as it corresponds to the content of S present in the core) and the amount of the removed S from the washed powder after the washing and filtering processes is defined as the amount of S present in the surface layer. The amount of sulfate ion (SO.sub.4.sup.2−) in the particle surface layer is obtained by multiplying the amount of S from this analysis by 2.996 and 10000 ppm, which is named S1. A sulfate ion surface coverage, S1/S2, is calculated by dividing S1 by S2.

B) X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Measurement

[0102] In the present invention, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is used to identify and to determine the content (in at %) of each of the Al-based compounds or phases present in the surface layer of the cathode material particles according to the invention.

[0103] Such an identification includes to perform: i) a fitting of Al2p peaks identified by XPS (cfr. section B2—XPS peak treatment) followed by ii) a quantitative phase analysis by calculating of the content for each of the compounds identified by the fitting of the Al2p peaks (cfr. section B3—content of Al-based compounds).

[0104] Also, XPS is used in the framework of the present invention to measure an Al surface coverage value which indicates the degree of homogeneity of said Al distribution in the surface layer of the particles according to the present invention.

B1) XPS Measurement Conditions

[0105] For the surface analysis of lithium transition metal-based oxide particles, XPS measurement is carried out using a Thermo K−α+ (Thermo Scientific) spectrometer. Monochromatic Al Kα radiation (hu=1486.6 eV) is used with a spot size of 400 μm and measurement angle of 45°. Wide survey scan to identify elements present at the surface is conducted at 200 eV pass energy. C1s peak having a maximum intensity (or centered) at 284.4 eV is used as a calibrate peak position after data collection. Accurate narrow-scans are performed afterwards at 50 eV for at least 10 scans for each identified element to determine the precise surface composition.

B2) XPS Peak Treatment

[0106] In XPS measurement, the signal is acquired from the first few nanometers (e.g. 1 nm to 10 nm) of the sample surface layer. Therefore, all elements measured by XPS are contained in the surface layer. It is assumed that the surface layer has a homogeneous distribution of the identified phases.

[0107] The quantitative phase analysis of XPS raw data is based on the treatment of XPS signals leading to a deconvolution of XPS peaks and to the determination of the contributions of the existing Al-based compounds to the deconvoluted peaks.

[0108] The XPS peak deconvolution is conducted to obtain the different contributions of atomic Al-based compounds including LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2, LiAlO.sub.2, and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 in the surface layer of investigated positive electrode active material particles. Al.sub.2O.sub.3 compound results from the heating of Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3 that has not reacted with the lithium of the first sintered lithium transition metal-based oxide compound.

[0109] The XPS peaks measured for the positive electrode active material powder according to the invention are essentially a combination of multiple sub-peaks located within a narrow range of binding energies. An Al.sub.2p peak having a maximum intensity appearing (or centered) at a range of binding energies going from 70 eV to 79 eV consists of contributions from different sub-peaks of different Al containing compounds. The location (position of the maximum intensity) of each sub-peak is different from each other.

[0110] The XPS signal treatment including XPS peak deconvolution process in this invention follows the steps provided hereunder:

Step 1) removal of background by a linear function,
Step 2) deciding an equation of a fitting model,
Step 3) deciding the constraints of variables in the equation of a fitting model,
Step 4) deciding the initial values of variables before a calculation,
Step 5) executing the calculation

Step 1) Removal of Background by a Linear Function

[0111] In this invention, the XPS signal treatment is performed using a spectrum of an Al2p narrow scan in the range from 65±0.5 eV to 85±0.5 eV, wherein the spectrum comprises an Al2p peak having a maximum intensity (or being centered) in a range from 70 eV to 85 eV and overlaps with Ni3p peaks, each of these peaks having a maximum intensity (or being centered) in a range from 65 eV to 71 eV. The background of the measured data point is linearly baselined at the range from 65.0±0.5 eV to 81.5±0.5 eV.

Step 2) Deciding an Equation of a Fitting Model

[0112] There are four sub-peaks of a Ni3p peak and three sub-peaks of an Al2p peak having a maximum intensity in the range from 65.0±0.5 eV to 81.5±0.5 eV. The peaks are labelled as Ni3p1, Ni3p1 satellite, Ni3p2, Ni3p2 satellite, Al peak1, Al peak2, and Al peak3. The satellite peak is a minor additional peak appearing at a few eV higher binding energy than its primary peak. It is associated with the unfiltered X-Ray source from anode material in the XPS instrument. Al peaks 1 to 3 correspond to the compounds present in the particle surface layer, each are related to the: i) LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2, ii) LiAlO.sub.2, and iii) Al.sub.2O.sub.3 phases, respectively.

[0113] Table 1.1 shows the reference of the maximum peak intensity position range for the LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2, LiAlO.sub.2, and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 phases. The range of binding energy of Al peak1 varies with the amount of Al doped in the structure.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1.1 XPS peak reference Binding Energy range Compound Peak (eV) attributed Literature reference Al peak1 72.6-73.1 LiM″.sub.1-a Chem. Mater. Vol. 19, No. 23, 5748- Al.sub.aO.sub.2 5757, 2007; J. Electrochem. Soc., 154 Al peak2 73.5-73.9 LiAlO.sub.2 (12) A1088-1099, 2007; and Chem. Mater. Vol. 21, No.23, 5607-5616, 2009. Al peak3 73.9-74.3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Moulder, J. F., Handbook of XPS, Perkin-Elmer, 1992

[0114] The equation of a fitting model is according to the pseudo-Voigt equation which is a combination of Gaussian and Lorentzian functions commonly used for XPS peak fitting. The equation is:

[00008]$y=y_o+A^{\prime }\left[m_u\frac{2}{\pi }\frac{w}{4{\left(x-x_c\right)}^2+w^2}+\left(1-m_u\right)\frac{\sqrt{4\ln 2}}{\sqrt{\pi }w}{e}^{\frac{4ln2}{w^2}{\left(x-x_c\right)}^2}\right]$

with y.sub.o=an offset, x.sub.c=a center position of the sub-peak, A′=an area of sub-peak, w=a width of sub-peaks (full width at half maximum or FWHM), and m.sub.u=a profile shape factor.

Step 3) Deciding the Constraints of Variables in the Equation of a Fitting Model

[0115] The constraints of five variables (y.sub.0, x.sub.c, A′, w, m.sub.u) are described below: [0116] y.sub.0 (offset): [0117] y.sub.0 of all 7 sub-peaks are 0. [0118] x.sub.c (a center position of the sub-peak): [0119] X.sub.c of Ni3p1≥66.0 eV; [0120] X.sub.c of Ni3p1≤X.sub.c of Ni3p1 satellite—0.7 eV; [0121] X.sub.c of Ni3p1 satellite ≤X.sub.c of Ni3p2—0.7 eV; [0122] X.sub.c of Ni3p2≤72 eV [0123] X.sub.c of Ni3p2≤X.sub.c of Ni3p2 satellite—0.7 eV; [0124] 72.3 eV≤X.sub.c of Al peak1≤73.3 eV; [0125] 73.3 eV≤X.sub.c of Al peak2≤73.9 eV; and [0126] 73.9 eV≤X.sub.c of Al peak3≤74.3 eV.

[0127] The ranges of X.sub.c for Al peaks 1 to 3 are determined from Chem. Mater. Vol. 19, No. 23, 5748-5757, 2007; 3. Electrochem. Soc., 154 (12) A1088-1099, 2007; and Chem. Mater. Vol. 21, No. 23, 5607-5616, 2009. [0128] A′ (area of sub-peaks): [0129] A′ of Ni3p1*0.1≤A′ of Ni3p1 satellite*1.2≤A′ of Ni3p1; [0130] A′ of Ni3p2*0.1≤A′ of Ni3p2 satellite; and [0131] A′ of all 7 sub-peak are superior to 1.0. [0132] w (width of sub-peaks): [0133] 1.2≤w≤1.8 [0134] M.sub.u (profile shape factor):
0.1≤m.sub.u≤0.9

Step 4) Deciding the Initial Values of Variables Before a Calculation

[0135] A calculation for fitting sub-peaks is reproducible when the initial values of variables are obtained according to the following procedure: [0136] 1) The initial values of y.sub.0, w, m.sub.u are set to 0, 1.5, and 0.7, respectively. [0137] 2) The initial values of x.sub.c of the sub-peaks Ni3p1, Ni3p1 satellite, Ni3p2, Ni3p2 satellite, Al peak1, Al peak2, and Al peak3 are 67.0 eV, 68.0 eV, 69.0 eV, 70.0 eV, 73.0 eV, 73.7 eV, and 74.3 eV, respectively. [0138] 3) The initial values of A′ of the sub-peaks Ni3p1, Ni3p1 satellite, Ni3p2, and Ni3p2 satellite are obtained by the following procedure: [0139] 3.a) The A′ of the sub-peak of Ni3p1 is a maximum peak intensity of a Ni3p peak multiplied by a 1.5 factor, wherein the shape of the peak is estimated as a triangle having a base of 3 eV. [0140] 3.b) The A′ of the sub-peak of Ni3p2 is 60% of that of Ni3p1. [0141] 3.c) The A′ of the sub-peak of Ni3p1 satellite is 80% of that of Ni3p1. [0142] 3.d) The A′ of the sub-peak of Ni3p2 satellite is 80% of that of Ni3p2. [0143] 4) The initial values of A′ of the sub-peaks Al peak1, Al peak2, and Al peak3 are obtained by following the procedure below:
4.a) A′ values of the three sub-peaks of Al2p are calculated according to the following equation:

A′=Fraction Factor (FF)×Estimated Area×Normalization Factor (NF)

[0144] A fraction Factor (FF) is a function of x.sub.c of three sub-peaks of Al2p in the range from x.sub.o to x.sub.n where x.sub.o=72.8 eV and x.sub.n=74.6 eV. The intensity of Al peak1 linearly decreases from x.sub.n to x.sub.o.

4.b) The intensity of Al peak3 linearly increases from x.sub.n to x.sub.o. The intensity of Al peak2, which is located between Al peak1 and Al peak3, has therefore the highest intensity at its center 73.7 eV. The Fraction Factor (FF) for each sub-peak is calculated according to the below equations:

[00009]$\mathrm{FF}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}1=\frac{x_n-x_c}{x_n-x_o};\mathrm{FF}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}2=-4\times {\left(\left(\frac{x_n-x_c}{x_n-x_o}\right)-0.5\right)}^2;\mathrm{and}\mathrm{FF}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}3=x_n-\left(\frac{x_n-x_c}{x_n-x_o}\right).$

[0145] The estimated area is a maximum peak intensity of an Al2p peak*2.5, wherein the shape of the peak is estimated as a triangle having a base of 5 eV.

4.c) A Normalization Factor (NF) is added to subtract the overlapping area from the total calculated peak when the sub-peaks are summed. It is important because the first two components in the peak area (A′) equation (Fraction Factor and Estimated Area) include some overlapped regions which render the calculated intensity excessively high. In the calculation method, sub-peaks are simplified so as to be considered like a triangle shape with a height t and a base b.

[0146] The locations of a maximum intensity are 72.8 eV, 74.0 eV, and 74.6 eV for Al peak1, Al peak2, and Al peak3, respectively. All sub-peaks are assumed to have the same size and shape with base b is set to be 1.8 eV. Normalization factor for each sub-peak is calculated as:

[00010]$\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{NF}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}1=\frac{\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}1}{\mathrm{overlapped}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}1}\\ =\frac{\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.3.Math.t\right)}{\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.3.Math.t\right)++\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.2.3\frac{23}{30}t\right)}\\ =0.57;\end{array}$$\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{NF}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}2=\frac{\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}2}{\mathrm{overlapped}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}2}\\ =\frac{\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.3.Math.t\right)}{\begin{array}{c}\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.3.Math.t\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.2.3.Math.\frac{23}{30}t\right)+\\ \left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.2.4.Math.\frac{24}{30}t\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.1.7.Math.\frac{17}{30}t\right)\end{array}}\\ =0.39;\mathrm{and}\end{array}$$\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{NF}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}3=\frac{\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}3}{\mathrm{overlapped}\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{peak}3}\\ =\frac{\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.3.Math.t\right)}{\begin{array}{c}\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.3.Math.t\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.2.4.Math.\frac{24}{30}t\right)+\\ \left(\frac{1}{2}.Math.1.7.Math.\frac{17}{30}t\right)\end{array}}\\ =0.51.\end{array}$

[0147] Table 1.2 shows the example of initial values of variables for EX1.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1.2 Example of initial values of variables for EX1 Param- Ni3p1 Ni3p2 Al Al Al eters Ni3p1 satellite Ni3p2 satellite peak1 peak2 peak3 y.sub.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x.sub.c 67.0 68.0 69.0 70.0 73.0 73.7 74.3 A′ 5966.6 4773.3 3579.9 2864.0 5721.7 11443.4 8582.6 W 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 m.sub.u 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7

Step 5) Executing the Calculation

[0148] The peak deconvolution process is assisted by a Solver tool, embedded in the Microsoft Excel software Version 1808. The minimum value of a target cell is set as the objective of the Solver calculation. The target cell returns the sum of squares of differences between a measured curve and a calculated curve. The calculation is terminated when the correlation coefficient between a measured curve and a calculated curve reaches 99.5% or more. When the number is closer to 100% it shows the shape of a calculated curve is closely matched with the shape of a measured curve. Otherwise, iterations will continue to reach the minimum value of the objective.

[0149] An Al2p peak of EX1 before and after fitting process is shown in FIG. 3A (x-axis: binding energy, y-axis: count) and FIG. 3B (x-axis: binding energy, y-axis: count), respectively. The result of calculated variables is shown in Table 1.3.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 1.3 Calculated parameter after fitting for EX1 Param- Ni3p1 Ni3p2 Al Al Al eter Ni3p1 satellite Ni3p2 satellite peak1 peak2 peak3 y.sub.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x.sub.c 67.1 68.4 69.9 70.6 73.2 73.8 74.3 A′ 6863.7 5414.2 2545.1 2202.9 4248.1 7240.5 6401.8 w 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.4 m.sub.u 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7

B3) Content of Al-Based Compounds Linked to Identified Al Sub-Peaks 1 to 3

[0150] The ratio of A′ (area) of each Al sub-peak is directly converted to the relative atomic ratio among corresponding Al compounds in a surface layer by dividing the area of each Al sub-peak by the total area of all three Al sub-peaks. The amount of LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2, LiAlO.sub.2, and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 is then provided with respect to the total atomic content of M′ in the positive electrode active material powder.

[0151] For example, the relative atomic ratio of Al peak1 (LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2): Al peak2 (LiAlO.sub.2): Al peak3 (Al.sub.2O.sub.3) is 23.7 at %:40.5 at %:35.8 at % in the surface layer of EX1 based on Table 1.2. Since the total content of aluminum is contained in the surface layer of EX1 and is obtained by ICP analysis, the amount of LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2, LiAlO.sub.2, and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 with respect to the total atomic content of M′ of the positive electrode active material powder is obtained by multiplying the atomic percentage of Al/M′ in the positive electrode active material powder (measured by ICP) and the relative atomic ratio of each Al sub-peaks (measured by XPS). For example, the amount of LiAlO.sub.2 in EX1 is 0.377 (at %) (Al/M′)*40.5% (LiAlO.sub.2/(LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2+LiAlO.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3)=0.15 at %.

B4) XPS Peak Integration and Coverage

[0152] All primary peaks for other elements except Al2p are fitted using the Thermo Scientific Avantage software with a Smart background. The background is a Shirley-type baseline with the constraint that background intensity must be lower than the data point intensity. An Al2p peak integrated area is calculated as the total area of Al peak1, Al peak2, and Al peak3 in B2) XPS deconvolution process. Scofield relative sensitivity library is used for the calculation of atomic fractions from the integrated peak area. The atomic ratio of Al to the total amount of Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and S (Al/(Ni+Mn+Co+Al+S) (at %/at %)) is named Al.

[0153] The Al surface coverage value is calculated as the fraction of Al on the surface of particle (A1), measured by XPS, divided by the Al fraction in the particle (A2), measured by ICP. The surface coverage of the positive electrode active material by Al is calculated as follow:

[00011]$\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{surface}\mathrm{coverage}=\frac{\mathrm{Al}/M^{*}\left(\mathrm{XPS}\right)}{\mathrm{Al}/M^{*}\left(\mathrm{ICP}\right)}=\frac{A1}{A2}$

Where M* is the total atomic fraction of Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and S of the positive electrode active material particles.

[0154] The surface coverage by Al indicates the degree of coverage of the positive active electrode active material particles by aluminum. If the Al surface coverage value is high, the Al compound covers the surface with a homogenous distribution.

C) Carbon Measurement

[0155] The content of carbon of the positive electrode active material powder is measured by Horiba EMIA-320V carbon/sulfur analyzer. 1 g of hNMC powder is placed in a ceramic crucible in a high frequency induction furnace. 1.5 g of tungsten and 0.3 g of tin as accelerators are added into the crucible. The powder is heated at a programmable temperature. Gases produced during the combustion are then analyzed by four Infrared detectors. The analysis of low and high CO.sub.2 and CO determines carbon concentration.

D) PSD Measurement

[0156] A particle-size distribution (PSD) is measured using a Malvern Mastersizer 3000 with Hydro MV wet dispersion accessory after dispersing the powder in an aqueous medium. In order to improve the dispersion of the powder, sufficient ultrasonic irradiation and stirring is applied, and an appropriate surfactant is introduced. D10, D50, and D90 are defined as the particle size at 10%, 50%, and 90% of the cumulative volume % distribution. A span is defined as span=(D90−D10)/D50.

E) TEM-EDS Measurement

[0157] To examine the Al distribution within a lithium transition metal-based oxide particle, cross-sectional TEM lamellas of particles are prepared by a Helios Nanolab 450 hp (FEI, USA) Dual Beam Scanning Electron Microscope-Focused Ion Beam (SEM-FIB). Ga ion beam is used with 30 kV voltage and 30 pA-7 nA current. The etched sample has a dimension of 5×8 μm with 100 nm thickness. Using the prepared sample, the surface property from the top to the center of the lithium transition metal-based oxide particle is analyzed by TEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The TEM-EDS is performed on a JEM-2100F (JEOL, https://www.jeol.co.jp/en/products/detail/JEM-2100F.html) with X-Max.sup.N 80T (Oxford instruments, https://nano.oxinst.com/products/x-max/x-max). An EDS analysis of the lithium transition metal-based oxide particle provides the quantitative element analysis of the cross-section. The Al and S are normalized by M* where M* is the total atomic fraction of Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and S.

[0158] The measured line scan of Al/M* and S/M* as a function of a linear distance in a cross section of particle is smoothed by Savitzhky-Golay filter with the points of 20 using Origin 9.1 software so as to mitigate intrinsic analytical error of EDS.

F) Coin Cell Testing

F1) Coin Cell Preparation

[0159] For the preparation of a positive electrode, a slurry that contains a positive electrode active material powder, conductor (Super P, Timcal), binder (KF #9305, Kureha)—with a formulation of 90:5:5 by weight—in a solvent (NMP, Mitsubishi) is prepared by a high-speed homogenizer. The homogenized slurry is spread on one side of an aluminum foil using a doctor blade coater with a 230 μm gap. The slurry coated foil is dried in an oven at 120° C. and then pressed using a calendaring tool. Then it is dried again in a vacuum oven to completely remove the remaining solvent in the electrode film. A coin cell is assembled in an argon-filled glovebox. A separator (Celgard 2320) is located between a positive electrode and a piece of lithium foil used as a negative electrode. 1M LiPF.sub.6 in EC/DMC (1:2) is used as electrolyte and is dropped between separator and electrodes. Then, the coin cell is completely sealed to prevent leakage of the electrolyte.

F2) Testing Method

[0160] The testing method is a conventional “constant cut-off voltage” test. The conventional coin cell test in the present invention follows the schedule shown in Table 2. Each cell is cycled at 25° C. using a Toscat-3100 computer-controlled galvanostatic cycling station (from Toyo).

[0161] The schedule uses a 1 C current definition of 220 mA/g. The initial charge capacity (CQ1) and discharge capacity (DQ1) are measured in constant current mode (CC) at C rate of 0.1 C in the 4.3V to 3.0V/Li metal window range.

[0162] The irreversible capacity IRRQ is expressed in % as follows:

[00012]$\mathrm{IRRQ}\left(\%\right)=\frac{\left(\mathrm{CQ}1-\mathrm{DQ}1\right)}{\mathrm{CQ}1}\times 100$

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 2 Cycling schedule for Coin cell testing method Charge Discharge V/Li V/Li End Rest metal End Rest metal C Rate current (min) (V) C Rate current (min) (V) 0.1 — 30 4.3 0.1 — 30 3.0

G) Full Cell Testing

G1) Full Cell Preparation

[0163] 650 mAh pouch-type cells are prepared as follows: a positive electrode active material, conductor (Super-P, Timcal), graphite (KS-6, Timcal) as positive electrode conductive agents, and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF 1710, Kureha) as a positive electrode binder are added to N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) as dispersion medium so that the mass ratio of the positive electrode active material powder, conductive agents (super P and graphite), and binder is set at 92/3/1/4. Thereafter, the mixture is kneaded to prepare a positive electrode slurry. The resulting positive electrode mixture slurry is then applied onto both sides of a positive electrode current collector, made of a 15 μm thick aluminum foil. The width of the applied area is 43 mm and the length is 407 mm. Typical loading weight of a positive electrode active material is about 11.5±0.2 mg/cm.sup.2. The electrode is then dried and calendared using a pressure of 120 Kgf (1176.8N) to an electrode density of 3.3±0.5 g/cm.sup.3. In addition, an aluminum plate serving as a positive electrode current collector tab is arc-welded to an end portion of the positive electrode.

[0164] Commercially available negative electrodes are used. In short, a mixture of graphite, carboxy-methyl-cellulose-sodium (CMC), and styrenebutadiene-rubber (SBR), in a weight ratio of 96/2/2, is applied on both sides of a copper foil. A nickel plate serving as a negative electrode current collector tab is arc-welded to an end portion of the negative electrode. A typical loading weight of a negative electrode active material is 8±0.5 mg/cm.sup.2. Non-aqueous electrolyte is obtained by dissolving lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF.sub.6) salt at a concentration of 1.0 mol/L in a mixed solvent of ethylene carbonate (EC), ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), and diethyl carbonate (DEC) in a volume ratio of 1:1:1. 1 wt % vinylene carbonate (VC), 0.5 wt % Lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB), 1 wt % LiPO.sub.2F.sub.2 are introduced in the above electrolyte as additives.

[0165] A sheet of the positive electrode, a sheet of the negative electrode, and a sheet of the separator made of a 20 μm-thick microporous polymer film (Celgard® 2320, Celgard) interposed between them are spirally wound using a winding core rod in order to obtain a spirally-wound electrode assembly. The assembly and the electrolyte are then put in an aluminum laminated pouch in an air-dry room with dew point of −50° C., so that a flat pouch-type lithium secondary battery is prepared. The design capacity of the secondary battery is 650 mAh when charged to 4.2V.

[0166] The non-aqueous electrolyte solution is impregnated for 8 hours at room temperature. The battery is pre-charged to 15% of its theoretical capacity and aged for a day at room temperature. The battery is then degassed using a pressure of −760 mmHg for 30 seconds, and the aluminum pouch is sealed. The battery is prepared for use as follows: the battery is charged using a current of 0.2 C (with 1 C=650 mA) in CC mode (constant current) up to 4.2V, then in CV mode (constant voltage) until a cut-off current of C/20 is reached, before the discharge in CC mode at 0.5 C rate, down to a cut-off voltage of 2.7V.

G2) Cycle Life Test

[0167] The prepared full cell battery is charged and discharged several times under the following conditions at 25° C. or 45° C., to determine their charge-discharge cycle performance: [0168] charge is performed in CC mode under 1 C rate up to 4.2V, then CV mode until C/20 is reached, [0169] the cell is then set to rest for 10 minutes, [0170] discharge is done in CC mode at 1 C rate down to 2.7V, [0171] the cell is then set to rest for 10 minutes, [0172] the charge-discharge cycles proceed until the battery reaches around 80% retained capacity. At that time, the cycle number before the 80% is indicated as “Cycle #80”. Every 100 cycles, one discharge is done at 0.2 C rate in CC mode down to 2.7V.

G3) Bulging Test

[0173] 650 mAh pouch-type batteries prepared by above preparation method are fully charged until 4.2V and inserted in an oven which is heated to 90° C., then stays for 4 hours. At 90° C., the charged positive electrode reacts with an electrolyte and creates gas. The evolved gas creates a bulging of the pouch. The increase of pouch thickness ((thickness after storage-thickness before storage)/thickness before storage) is measured after 4 hours.

H) Results

[0174] The invention is further illustrated by the following (non-limitative) examples:

Example 1

[0175] Polycrystalline hNMC powders (CEX1), having the formula Li.sub.1+a(Ni.sub.0.8Mn.sub.0.1Co.sub.0.1).sub.1-aO.sub.2 are obtained through a double sintering process which is a solid-state reaction between a lithium source and a transition metal-based source running as follows:

1) Co-precipitation: a transition metal-based hydroxide precursor M′O.sub.0.24(OH).sub.1.76 with metal composition M′=Ni.sub.0.80Mn.sub.0.10Co.sub.0.1 is prepared by a co-precipitation process in a large-scale continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) with mixed nickel-manganese-cobalt sulfates, sodium hydroxide, and ammonia.
2) Blending: the transition metal-based hydroxide and LiOH as a lithium source are homogenously blended at a lithium to metal M′ (Li/M′) ratio of 1.01 in an industrial blending equipment.
3) 1.sup.st sintering: the blend is sintered at 730° C. for 12 hours under an oxygen atmosphere. The sintered powder is crushed, classified, and sieved so as to obtain a sintered intermediate product.
4) 2.sup.nd sintering: the intermediate product is sintered at 830° C. for 12 hours under an oxygen atmosphere. The sintered powder is crushed, classified, and sieved so as to obtain CEX1 having a formula Li.sub.1.005M′.sub.0.995O.sub.2 (a=0.005) with M′=Ni.sub.0.8Mn.sub.0.10Co.sub.0.1. CEX1 has D50 of 12.0 μm and SPAN of 1.24. CEX1 comprises a trace of sulfur obtained from the metal sulfate sources in the Step 1) co-precipitation process.

[0176] Optionally, a source of dopant can be added in the co-precipitation process in Step 1) or in the blending step in the Step 2) together with lithium source. Dopant can be added, for instance, to improve the electrochemical properties of the positive electrode active material powder product.

[0177] CEX1 is not according to the present invention.

[0178] EX1, which is according to the present invention, is prepared by the following procedure. 1 kg of CEX1 is blended with an aluminum and sulfate ion solution, which is prepared using 11.68 g Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3.16H.sub.2O and 29.66 mL deionized purified water. The prepared blend is heated at 375° C. for 8 hours under an oxygen atmosphere. After heating, the powder is crushed, classified, and sieved so as to obtain EX1. Accordingly, the hNMC compound, EX1, contains about 1000 ppm Al with respect to the total weight of EX1. The preparation of EX1 from CEX1 is also called, in the framework of the present invention, a surface treatment.

[0179] EX1 has a polycrystalline morphology. This morphology can be modified into a monolithic morphology by applying the following steps 4a and 4b after the 2.sup.nd sintering [i.e. step 4 of the manufacturing process of CEX1 according to the Example 1] and before the subsequent crushing, classifying and sieving steps:

4a) subjecting the sintered intermediate product to a wet ball milling step whereby agglomerated primary particles are deagglomerated and a slurry comprising deagglomerated primary particles is obtained, and
4b) separating the deagglomerated primary particles from the slurry, and heat treating the deagglomerated primary particles at a temperature between 300° C. and at least 200° C. below the temperature in the 2.sup.nd sintering step (4) [i.e. of at most 630° C.], whereby single crystal monolithic particles are obtained.

[0180] Such a treatment to convert polycrystalline particles into monolithic particles is known from EX1 of WO2019/185349, in page 20, line 11 to page 20, line 33.

[0181] CEX2, which is not according to the present invention, is obtained according to the same method as EX1, except that the aluminum and sulfate ion solution is prepared using 23.36 g Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3.16H.sub.2O and 24.32 mL deionized purified water. Accordingly, the hNMC compound, CEX2, contains about 2000 ppm Al with respect to the total weight of CEX2.

[0182] CEX3, which is not according to the present invention, is prepared by the following procedure. 1 kg of CEX1 is blended with 2 g of Al.sub.2O.sub.3 powder and further with an aluminum and sulfate ion solution, which is prepared 12 g Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8 powder and 35 mL deionized purified water. The blend is heated at 375° C. for 8 hours under an oxygen atmosphere. After heating, the powder is crushed, classified, and sieved so as to obtain CEX3. Accordingly, the hNMC compound, CEX3, contains about 1000 ppm Al with respect to the total weight of CEX3.

[0183] The total amount of aluminum (Al), sulfur (S), sulfate ion (sulfate or SO.sub.4.sup.2−), and carbon (C) in EX1, CEX1, CEX2, and CEX3 is investigated as described in section A) ICP analysis and C) Carbon measurement. For EX1 and CEX3, Al compounds and its distribution on the surface layer are investigated by B) XPS measurement. EX1, CEX1, CEX2, and CEX3 are also evaluated as described in section F) coin cell testing. The analysis results are shown in Table 3.1 to Table 3.4 and FIG. 4A, FIG. 4B, and FIG. 5.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 3.1 ICP, C, and S surface coverage results ICP Entire hNMC powder Surface layer Sulfate ion According S2 S1 surface Carbon Sample to Al S Sulfate ion S* Sulfate ion coverage C Link to features of ID invention (wt %) (wt %) (ppm) (wt %) (ppm) S1/S2 (ppm) claim EX1 Yes 0.1058 0.3235 9691 0.2806 8406 0.87 108 In the claimed range CEX1 No 0.0015 0.1669 5000 0.1239 3712 0.74 270 Low Al and S CEX2 No 0.1854 0.4732 14176 0.3806 11402 0.80 58 High Al and S CEX3 No 0.0968 0.4333 12981 0.3891 11657 0.90 93 High S S*: amount of S in the surface layer S1 and S2: amount of sulfate ion obtained according to the following equations: S.sub.1 = S * (wt. %) × 2.996 × 10000 ppm, S.sub.2 = S (wt. %) × 2.996 × 10000 ppm

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 3.2 Coin cell performance of EXI, CEX1, CEX2, and CEX3 Coin cell testing Sample According DQ1 IRRQ ID to invention (mAh/g) (%) EX1 Yes 205.0  9.7 CEX1 No 195.3 13.9 CEX2 No 192.6 11.8 CEX3 No 193.6 13.8

[0184] EX1 shows improved electrochemical performance compared to CEX1 because the high C content of CEX1 causes poor electrochemical performance induced from a side reaction between the electrode active material and the electrolyte during cycling. A proper amount of S in the surface layer prevents the formation of impurities such as Li.sub.2CO.sub.3, which originate from a transition metal-based oxide precursor or from a lithium source (as an impurity). Exposure to an air of the hNMC powder during manufacturing also affects to increase the amount C, as an impurity.

[0185] For CEX2, which uses the surface treatment source containing twice as much Al and S as for EX1, the C content is further reduced, but DQ1 and IRRQ are deteriorated. This is because too high contents of Al and S exist in the surface layer, which degrades battery performance.

[0186] To understand the sulfate ion surface coverage of the hNMC compounds prepared in Example 1, amounts of sulfate ion in the entire powder and the surface layer are investigated as described in section A) ICP analysis. The S content (or S content) in the entire powder of the positive electrode active material powder is determined by ICP, and the value obtained by converting the amount of S into the amount of sulfate ion is defined as S2. Also, the filtered solution from a mixture of the hNMC powder and water is investigated by ICP. The solution contains dissolved S from the surface layer of the lithium transition metal-based oxide particles. As a result, the S content obtained from the solution is converted to the amount of sulfate ion, which is named S1. Finally, the sulfate ion surface coverage is determined by dividing S1 by S2. When the sulfate ion surface coverage, S1/S2, is 0.85 or more, the C content is reduced and the electrochemical performance is improved as the core of the positive electrode active material powder is uniformly covered with the sulfate ion.

[0187] However, CEX3, which has a similar Al content (or Al content) but a higher S content induced by another surface treatment source, shows degraded capacity regardless of the excellent sulfate ion surface coverage. Therefore, in the present invention, the S content between 0.150 wt % and 0.375 wt % in the surface layer of the hNMC powder is preferred. In other words, the sulfate ion content between 4500 ppm to 11250 ppm in the surface layer of the hNMC powder is preferred.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 3.3 XPS peak deconvolution of EXI and CEX3 XPS-Atomic ratio/M′ (at %) Sample According to Al peak1 Al peak2 Al peak3 ID invention (LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2) (LiAlO.sub.2) (Al.sub.2O.sub.3) EX1 Yes 0.09 0.15 0.13 CEX3 No 0.04 0.10 0.21

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 3.4 Al surface coverage of EX1 and CEX3 ICP XPS A2 Al2p peak A1 Al surface Sample According Al/M* position Al/M* coverage ID to invention (at/at) (eV) (at/at) A1/A2 EX1 Yes 0.0038 73.78 0.528 139 CEX3 No 0.0035 74.08 0.486 139 M* = Ni + Mn + Co + Al + S

[0188] For further investigation of the surface properties, EX1, CEX1, and CEX3 are analyzed as described in section B) XPS measurement. As shown in FIG. 4A (x-axis: binding energy, y-axis: count), XPS spectra exhibits the peaks of Al2p and Ni3p having a maximum intensity at the range between 80 eV and 65 eV. The maximum peak intensity of Al2p of EX1 and CEX3 are at the binding energy of 73.78 eV and 74.08 eV, respectively. The Al2p peak position of EX1 and CEX3 having a maximum intensity are indicated in Table 3.4. As disclosed in Chem. Mater., 2017, 19, 5748-5757, if the Al2p peak position shifts to the lower binding energy while the Ni3p peak position does not change, it indicates the presence of LiAlO.sub.2 compound. A batter battery performance, as shown in Table 3.2 is attributed to the appearance in Al2p peak in the range from 73.6 eV to 74.1 eV, corresponding to the presence of LiAlO.sub.2 compound such as in EX1. FIG. 4B depicts the binding energy range for Al2p3 XPS peaks each for of LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2, LiAlO.sub.2, and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 phases. The vertical dashed line shows the Al2p3 XPS peak position for CEX1 whereas the vertical solid line shows the Al2p3 XPS peak position for EX1.

[0189] The Al2p peak contains compounds such as LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2, LiAlO.sub.2, and Al.sub.2O.sub.3, and the respective amounts of these compounds are quantified by the procedure described in section B2) XPS peak deconvolution. Table 3.3 shows the Al peak position and quantification of Al compounds. In the case of EX1, which has excellent electrochemical performances, it is confirmed that the content of Al peak2, which indicates the presence of a LiAlO.sub.2 phase, is superior or equal to 0.10 at % and inferior or equal to 0.30 at % with respect to the total atomic content of M′ of the positive electrode active material powder. In addition, the LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2 content is inferior to 0.14 at % with respect to the total atomic content of M′ of the positive electrode active material powder.

[0190] In order to investigate the surface coverage by Al in the positive electrode active material powder, the atomic ratio of Al/M″ from XPS analysis (A1) is divided by the atomic ratio of Al/M″ from ICP analysis (A2), as indicated by B4) XPS peak integration and coverage. When the value of Al1/Al2 is higher than or equal to 100, it means the positive electrode active material compounds have Al uniformly distributed in the surface layer. As shown Table 3.4, EX1 and CEX3 have homogeneous Al distribution in the surface layer regardless of the surface treatment method.

[0191] To evaluate the full cell performance of hNMC powders in this Example, the full cell test is performed as described in section G2) Cycle life test in the range from 2.7V to 4.2V both at 25° C. and 45° C. To investigate the safety of full cell, the thickness increase is measured during the bulging test at 90° C. as described as in G3) Bulging test. Full cell test results of EX1, CEX1 and CEX3 are shown in Table 4 and FIG. 5 (x-axis: cycle number, y-axis: capacity retention). In Table 4, ‘Cycle #80%’ means the number of cycles reached before capacity retention of 80%.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 4 Full cell performance of EX1, CEX1 and CEX3 Bulging Full cell Thickness Method According Specific Effi- Cycle# Cycle# increase (%) Sample to capacity ciency 80% 80% after 90° C. ID invention (mAh/g) (%) (25° C.) (45° C.) bulging test EX1 Yes 194.9 83.1 463 362 24 CEX1 No 189.2 81.9 322 160 52 CEX3 No 192.5 83.4 347 216 26

[0192] As shown in Table 4 and FIG. 5, EX1 having Al compounds uniformly distributed on the surface layer exhibits higher specific capacity and better cycle life. When cycled at elevated temperature such as 45° C., it still shows good cycle stability. This result is correlated to the safety test where the thickness increase is alleviated by the surface treatment.

[0193] The surface layer of EX1 is confirmed as described in section E) TEM-EDS measurement, and the results is shown in FIG. 6A and FIG. 6B (x-axis: distance where 0 is the starting point of the surface layer, y-axis: element in atomic ratio). A cross-section sample prepared by SEM-FIB is investigated in a TEM/EDS equipment, and the Al and S content of the sample in atomic ratio is obtained by dividing by the total amount of transition metals, Al, and S.

[0194] It is shown in FIG. 6A that S/M* reaches 0 at % at a linear distance (or distance) of 100 nm from the external edge of the surface layer of the particles. The thickness of the surface layer of EX1 particles is therefore of 100 nm.

[0195] FIG. 6B shows that the total content of aluminum is contained in the 100 nm thickness surface layer of EX1 particles.

[0196] This is indeed expected since CEX1 particles (before the surface treatment) do not contain aluminum.

[0197] It is shown in FIG. 6A that the S/M* ratio reaches 0 at % at a linear distance (or distance) of 100 nm from the external edge of the surface layer of the particles. The thickness of the surface layer of EX1 particles is therefore of 100 nm.

[0198] FIG. 6B shows that the total content of aluminum is contained in the 100 nm thickness surface layer of EX1 particles.

[0199] This is indeed expected since CEX1 particles (before the surface treatment) do not contain aluminum.

[0200] In the case of a hNMC containing aluminum as a dopant present in its core, meaning before the surface treatment is applied, the amount of aluminum in a surface layer (Al.sub.surface) with respect to the total amount of aluminum in the positive electrode active material powder after the surface treatment is applied (Al.sub.total) of the hNMC according to the invention is obtained by the following procedure: [0201] 1) Firstly, the total amount of aluminum in the positive electrode active material powder (Al/M*.sub.ICP) is obtained by ICP analysis. [0202] 2) Secondly, an line profile of a cross section of a particle is measured by techniques such as EDS and/or EELS (Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy). [0203] 3) Thirdly, the thickness of the surface layer is determined based on the sulfur content evolution wrt the distance from the external edge of the particles (a distance from the external edge of the surface layer to a point in the particle when S/M*=0 or S/M* is constant), said minimal distance D being defined as:

D (in nm)=L.sub.S1−L.sub.S2  wherein L.sub.S1 is a first point location at the edge of a particle, L.sub.S2 is a second point location in a line defined between said first point location and a geometric center of said particle, wherein a content of S is measured by TEM-EDS at the second point location L.sub.S2 is superior or equal to 0 at % and inferior or equal to 5.0 at % of a content of S measured at the first point location (L.sub.S1), said second content of S (S2) being defined as:

S.sub.2 (in at %)=S.sub.3±0.1 at %,  S.sub.3 being a content of S (in at %) at a third point location (LS.sub.3) in said line, said third point being located at any location between the geometric center of said particle and the second point location L.sub.S2. [0204] 4) Fourthly, an Area1 parameter is obtained by integrating Al/M* on a distance in the surface layer in the one-dimensional line profile (cfr. FIG. 6B) and an Area2 parameter is obtained by integrating Al/M* by a distance from the external edge of the surface layer to the center of a particle. Assuming that a particle is spherical and the surface layer is uniform, Area1 and Area2 are used to calculate the atomic ratio of Al.sub.surface to Al.sub.total by a following equation.

[00013]${\mathrm{Al}}_{\mathrm{surface}}/{\mathrm{Al}}_{\mathrm{total}}=\frac{\frac{4}{3}{\pi \left(\mathrm{Area}2\right)}^3-\frac{4}{3}{\lambda \left(\mathrm{Area}2-\mathrm{Area}3\right)}^3}{\frac{4}{3}{\pi \left(\mathrm{Area}2\right)}^3}\times 100\left(\mathrm{at}\%\right)$

The amount of aluminum in a surface layer with respect to total atomic content of M′ in the positive electrode active material powder is obtained by multiplying the Al/M*.sub.ICP ratio to the Al.sub.surface/Al.sub.total ratio, according to the following equation: Al/M*.sub.ICP*Al.sub.surface/Al.sub.total.

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 5 Summary of the invention and the process related thereto Link to the manufacturing process Claim Features according to EXI 1 Surface layer comprising sulfur in a The amount of sulfur, which further can be content superior or equal to 0.150 wt % converted into sulfate ion, is proportional and inferior or equal to 0.375 wt % to the amount of Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3 .Math. 16H.sub.2O added in with respect to the total weight of the the preparation of EX1 from CEX1. positive electrode active material The initial sulfur amount on the surface of powder. the positive electrode active material particles is represented by S* value of CEX1 in Table 3.1. Accordingly, the addition of 150-1400 ppm Al using Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3 .Math. 16H.sub.2O compound produces positive electrode active material powder surface layer comprising sulfur in the content superior or equal to 0.150 wt % and inferior or equal to 0.375 wt %. 6 LiAlO.sub.2 phase being present in the The amount of LiAlO.sub.2 and LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2 surface layer in a content superior or phase is related to the heating temperature equal to 0.10 at % and inferior or equal of the CEX1 blend with Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3 .Math. 16H.sub.2O as to 0.30 at % with respect to the total described in preparation of EX1. When the atomic content of M′ in the positive heating temperature is in the range of electrode active material powder, said 300° C.-500° C., there are more LiAlO.sub.2 phase LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2phase being present in the in the surface in comparison with the surface layer in a content superior or amount of LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2 or Al.sub.2O.sub.3. On the equal to 0 at % and inferior or equal to other hand, when the heating temperature 0.14 at % with respect to the total is higher than 500° C., there are more atomic content of M′ in the positive LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2 phase in the surface in compar- electrode active material powder. ison with the amount of LiAlO.sub.2 or Al.sub.2O.sub.3.

[0205] Table 5 summarizes the preparation process of the positive electrode active material according to this invention to achieve the claimed features.

Example 2

[0206] CEX4 is obtained according to the same method as CEX1, except that a transition metal-based hydroxide precursor M′O.sub.0.24(OH).sub.1.76 with metal composition M′=Ni.sub.0.80Mn.sub.0.10Co.sub.0.1 having a SPAN of 0.65 is pre-heated at 365° C. for 10 hours before blending with a Li source. Also, the final hNMC powder has a D50 of 11.7 μm and a span of 0.65, which value is much lower than that of CEX1. CEX4 is not according to the present invention.

[0207] EX2 is prepared according to the same method as EX1, except that CEX4 having a SPAN of 0.65 is used instead of CEX1 and the heating temperature is 400° C. in the surface layer process. EX2 is according to the present invention.

[0208] CEX5 is prepared according to the same method as EX2, except that the heating temperature is 550° C. in the surface treatment process. CEX5 is not according to the present invention.

[0209] The electrochemical performance of EX2, CEX4, and CEX5 is evaluated by the same method as in Example 1. The initial discharge capacities and irreversible capacities are shown in Table 6.1. The Al compound and its distribution on the surface of EX2, CEX4, and CEX5 are investigated by the same method in Example 1. The surface properties are illustrated in Table 6.2.

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 6.1 Coin cell performance of EX2, CEX4, and CEX5 Surface treatment Coin cell Link to Sample According Temperature DQ1 IRRQ features of ID to invention (° C.) (mAh/g) (%) claim EX2 Yes 400 206.4  9.9 — CEX4 No — 195.3 13.7 Low Al CEX5 No 550 195.3 13.4 High Al LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 6.2 XPS peak deconvolution of EX2 and CEX5 Atomic ratio/M′ (at %) Sample According Al peak1 Al peak2 Al peak3 ID to invention (LiM″.sub.1-aAl.sub.aO.sub.2) (LiAlO.sub.2) (Al.sub.2O.sub.3) EX2 Yes 0.05 0.13 0.18 CEX5 No 0.14 0.16 0.10

[0210] Table 6.1 shows that EX2 with a much narrow SPAN such as 0.65 exhibits a high discharge capacity and an excellent reversibility, as in EX1 in Example 1. As shown in Table 6.2, CEX5, a surface treated product at high temperature such as 550° C., has the amount of Al peak1 much higher than EX2 prepared at 400° C. Therefore, the heating temperature during surface treatment is preferred at 500° C. or lower.

Example 3

[0211] A Polycrystalline hNMC powder having the Ni to M′ atomic ratio of 87 at % is prepared in this Example to identify the surface treatment effect as follows:

1) Co-precipitation: a mixed metal-based hydroxide precursor M′O.sub.0.26(OH).sub.1.74 with metal composition M′=Ni.sub.0.87Mn.sub.0.03Co.sub.0.1 is prepared by a co-precipitation process in a large-scale continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) with mixed nickel-manganese-cobalt sulfates, sodium hydroxide and ammonia.
2) Blending: to obtain an intermediate product, the mixed transition metal-based precursor and LiOH.H.sub.2O as a lithium source are homogenously blended at a Li/M′ ratio of 0.99 in an industrial blending equipment.
3) Sintering: the blend is sintered at 755° C. for 12 hours under an oxygen atmosphere. After the sintering, the sintered powder is classified and sieved so as to obtain a non-agglomerated hNMC powder.

[0212] The final hNMC powder, which named CEX6, has the formula Li.sub.0.995M′.sub.1.005O.sub.2 and its D50 and SPAN are 12.8 μm and 1.41, respectively. CEX6 is not according to the present invention.

[0213] CEX7 is prepared according to the same method as EX1 except that CEX6 is used instead of CEX1. CEX7 is not according to the present invention.

[0214] The electrochemical performance of CEX6 and CEX7 is evaluated by the same method as Example 1. The initial discharge capacities and irreversible capacities are shown in Table 7.

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 7 Coin cell performance of CEX6 and CEX7 Coin cell Link to Sample According DQ1 IRRQ features ID to invention (mAh/g) (%) of claim CEX6 No 194.9 17.8 High Ni, no Al CEX7 No 186.1 18.6 High Ni

[0215] As shown in Table 6, hNMC compound (CEX7) with the atomic ratio of Ni to M′ as high as 0.80 still exhibits a low discharge capacity and a high IRRQ despite the surface treatment.

Example 4

[0216] A polycrystalline hNMC powder having a Ni to M′ atomic ratio of 86 at % with a formula Li.sub.1+a(Ni.sub.0.86Mn.sub.0.04Co.sub.0.10).sub.1-aO.sub.2 is prepared in this Example to identify the surface treatment effect as follows:

1) Co-precipitation: a transition metal-based hydroxide precursor M′O.sub.0.16(OH).sub.1.84 with metal composition M′=Ni.sub.0.86Mn.sub.0.04Co.sub.0.10 is prepared by a co-precipitation process in a CSTR with mixed nickel-manganese-cobalt sulfates, sodium hydroxide, and ammonia.
2) Blending: to obtain an intermediate product, the mixed transition metal-based precursor prepared from Step 1) and LiOH.H.sub.2O as a lithium source are homogenously blended at a Li/M′ ratio of 1.02 in an industrial blending equipment.
3) Sintering: the blend is sintered at 765° C. for 12 hours under an oxygen atmosphere. After the sintering, the sintered powder is classified and sieved so as to obtain a non-agglomerated hNMC powder.

[0217] The final hNMC powder, which named CEX8, has the formula Li.sub.1.002M′.sub.0.998O.sub.2 and its D50 and span are 11.2 μm and 0.53, respectively. CEX8 is not according to the present invention.

[0218] EX3 is prepared according to the same method as EX1 except that CEX8 is used instead of CEX1.

[0219] EX3, which is according to the present invention, is prepared by the following procedure: 1 kg of CEX8 is blended with an aluminum and sulfate ion solution, which is prepared by dissolving 11.68 g Al.sub.2(SO.sub.4).sub.3.16H.sub.2O into 29.66 mL deionized water. The prepared blend is heated at 375° C. for 8 hours under an oxygen atmosphere. After heating, the powder is crushed, classified, and sieved so as to obtain CEX8. Accordingly, the hNMC compound, EX3, contains about 1000 ppm Al with respect to the total weight of EX3.

[0220] The electrochemical performance of EX3 and CEX8 is evaluated by the same method as Example 1. The initial discharge capacities and irreversible capacities are shown in Table 8.

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 8 Coin cell performance of CEX8 and EX3 Coin cell Link to Sample According DQ1 IRRQ features ID to invention (mAh/g) (%) of claim EX3 Yes 212.3  8.1 High Ni, Al CEX8 No 207.6 11.2 High Ni, no Al

[0221] As shown in Table 8, hNMC compound (EX3) with the atomic ratio of Ni to M′ as high as 0.86 exhibits a higher DQ1 and IRRQ improvement in comparison with CEX8. The observation indicates surface treatment can be applied for the composition with atomic ratio of Ni to M′ of 0.86.