MULTIFUNCTIONAL CYCLIC ORGANIC CARBONATES AS CURING AGENTS FOR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS HAVING PHENOLIC HYDROXYL GROUPS

Abstract

The invention relates to a curable mixture comprising at least one organic compound having phenolic hydroxyl groups and at least one multifunctional cyclic organic carbonate as crosslinking agent, to a method of curing the said organic compound having phenolic hydroxyl groups with at least one multifunctional cyclic organic carbonate, and to binders for coating compositions, adhesive compositions, or filler compositions comprising at least one organic compound having phenolic hydroxyl groups and at least one multifunctional cyclic organic carbonate.

Claims

1.-13. (canceled)

14. A curable mixture comprising at least one organic compound having phenolic hydroxyl groups and at least one multifunctional cyclic organic carbonate C as crosslinking agent.

15. The curable mixture of claim 14, wherein the organic compound having phenolic hydroxyl groups is a novolak N, a tannin T, or a lignin L.

16. The curable mixture of claim 15, wherein the novolak N is made by reaction of phenol C.sub.6H.sub.5OH and formaldehyde HCHO.

17. The curable mixture of claim 15, wherein the novolak N is made by reaction of a mixture of phenol C.sub.6H.sub.5OH with at least one alkylphenol having from one to twenty carbon atoms in the alkyl group, and formaldehyde HCHO.

18. The curable mixture of claim 15, wherein the lignin L is selected from the group consisting of Kraft lignin, soda lignin, sulphite lignin, and organosolv lignin.

19. The curable mixture of claim 14, wherein the multifunctional cyclic organic carbonate C has at least two cyclocarbonate structures in its molecule, wherein the cyclocarbonate structures obey the formula ##STR00003## where R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 are independently of each other selected from the group consisting of H and alkyl groups having from one to six carbon atoms.

20. The curable mixture of claim 14, wherein the multifunctional cyclocarbonate is a cyclocarbonate C6 that has six ring atoms (1,3-dioxane-2-ones), as depicted in Formula II ##STR00004## where each of R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 is independently selected from the group consisting of H and alkyl groups having from one to six carbon atoms.

21. The curable mixture of claim 19, wherein the multifunctional cyclic organic carbonate is obtainable from a multifunctional epoxide by insertion of carbon dioxide into multifunctional epoxides E, or by reaction of vicinal diols D having at least two sets of vicinal diol groups, with a dialkyl carbonate or a monofunctional cyclocarbonate.

22. The curable mixture of claim 21, wherein the epoxide E is selected from the group consisting of a novolak which is etherified with an average of at least two molecules of glycidol, an epoxy resin obtainable by reacting a multifunctional hydroxyaromatic compound with epichlorohydrin or with a multifunctional epoxide based on aromatic or aliphatic multifunctional hydroxy compounds, and multifunctional epoxidised olefin oligomers or polymers, and multifunctional epoxidised vegetable oils, wherein the word multifunctional always means at least two functionalities.

23. The curable mixture of claim 21, wherein a multifunctional vicinal diol D is made from a lignin L or from a tannin T by reaction thereof with a hydroxyfunctional cyclic carbonate to lead to a bis(hydroxyalkyl) derivate having at least two bis(hydroxyalkyl) groups per molecule.

24. The curable mixture of claim 23, where the hydroxyfunctional cyclic carbonate is glycerol carbonate.

25. A method of curing the curable mixture of claim 14, which comprises reacting the said organic compound with at least one multifunctional cyclic organic carbonate C wherein in mass ratio m.sub.O/m.sub.CC is from 0.1 to 10, where m.sub.O is the mass of the organic compound, and m.sub.CC is the mass of the multifunctional cyclocarbonates CC used.

26. A binders for coating compositions, adhesive compositions, or filler compositions comprising the curable mixture as claimed in claim 14.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

[0007] FIG. 1 shows elugrams from a size-exclusion chromatographic analysis where the elugrams of pure lignin (the reactant) and a polymer formed by reaction of lignin with the multifunctional cyclocarbonates BCC (difunctional; FIG. 1a) and TCC (trifunctional; FIG. 1b), catalysed by DBU, at 170° C., and a 12 h-reaction time are compared; the larger molecules formed in the reaction eluting before the smaller lignin molecules.

[0008] FIG. 2 shows the thermal behaviour of mixtures of multifunctional cyclic carbonates, novolak (2 b) or lignin (2a), BCC and catalyst (DBU) of examples 8 and 10.

[0009] FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate FTIR spectroscopic investigations of the crosslinking reaction with multifunctional cyclic carbonates.

[0010] FIG. 5 shows examples of ABES tests with mixtures of lignin, lignin prepolymer and TCC in different mixing ratios. Shear strengths of about 4 MPa (4 N/mm.sup.2) have been obtained with a mass ratio of the said components of approximately 1:1:1.

[0011] FIG. 6 shows the ABES test results obtained for mixtures of lignin prepolymer, lignin, TCC, adipic acid and soy protein isolate in different mixing ratios. Shear strengths of about 4 MPa (4 N/mm.sup.2) were obtained with a mass fraction of lignin prepolymer between 20% and 30%. Furthermore, it was found that the addition of soy protein isolate or of adipic acid in a mass fraction of up to 20% in the mixture, respectively, does not lead to a significant reduction or to an enhancement of the adhesion under the given conditions, measured by the shear strength σ.sub.s.

[0012] FIG. 7 shows the ABES test results of a further test series where the shear strength σ.sub.s of different mixtures containing lignin prepolymer, lignin, TCC, adipic acid, and chickpea flour (“KEM”) were examined. Mixtures with a mass fraction w(LP) of lignin prepolymer of from approximately 20% to 40%, a mass fraction w(L) of lignin of approximately 20%, and a mass fraction w(TCC) of TCC of approximately from 30% to 40% led to shear strength σ.sub.s of more than 4 MPa (4 N/mm.sup.2). The addition of KEM or adipic acid in a mass fraction of up to 40%, respectively, did not increase or decrease the adhesion significantly under the given conditions, measured by the shear strength σ.sub.s.

[0013] FIG. 8 provides a comparison of the shear strength σ.sub.s measured in the ABES tests for the optimum compositions from the tests in FIGS. 6 and 7 using: [0014] lignin L, lignin prepolymer LP, and TCC (leftmost bar 1), [0015] lignin L, lignin prepolymer LP, TCC, adipic acid ADA, and chickpea flour KEM (second bar 2), [0016] lignin L, lignin prepolymer LP, and TCC (leftmost bar), adipic acid ADA, and soybean protein isolate SPI (third bar 3), and tetramine, rightmost bar 4).

[0017] FIG. 9 shows the results of determination of the longitudinal tensile shear strength test according to DIN EN 302-1, where beech wood panels with a length of 340 mm, a width of 150 mm, and a thickness of 5 mm were conditioned in a standardised climate (25° C., 65% relative air humidity), and bonded with adhesive mixtures applied in an areic density of 150 g/m.sup.2 at a pressure of 0.3 MPa and at a temperature of 180° C. for 60 min.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0018] The multifunctional cyclic carbonates C according to the invention have at least two, and preferably from two to twelve, particularly preferably, from two to six, cyclocarbonate structures in their molecules. A cyclocarbonate structure obeys the formula

##STR00001##

[0019] where R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 are independently of each other selected from the group consisting of H and alkyl groups having at least one carbon atom, preferably from one to six carbon atoms. They can be formed by insertion of carbon dioxide into multifunctional epoxides E having at least two epoxide groups per molecule, or by reaction of vicinal diols D having at least two sets of vicinal diol groups, with a dialkyl carbonate or a monofunctional cyclocarbonate such as ethylenecarbonate (1,3-dioxolan-2-one) or propylenecarbonate (4-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-one).

[0020] Multifunctional epoxides E are preferably selected from low molar mass epoxide resins that have specific amounts of epoxide groups of from 0.2 mol/kg to 5.4 mol/kg, preferably novolak epoxy resins which may have average degrees of polymerisation which is equal to the average number of epoxide groups per molecule, of from 2.0 to 5.0, and preferably, a specific amount of epoxide groups of 4.5 mol/kg to 6 mol/kg. In these novolak epoxy resins, usually all phenolic hydroxyl groups have been converted to epoxide groups by reaction of the novolak with epichlorohydrin. Other multifunctional epoxides can be prepared by epoxidation of polyolefins which comprise residual carbon-carbon double bonds, preferably polymers made from alkadienes such as polybutadiene or polyisoprene, or copolymers made from alkenes and alkadienes such as ethylene-butadiene, ethylene-propylene-1,4-hexadiene, or styrene-butadiene copolymers. In these polymers and copolymers, reaction of olefinic unsaturations to epoxides is preferably made only partially. It is also possible to use epoxidised vegetable oils, such as epoxidised soy bean oil or epoxidised linseed oil. All these multifunctional epoxides can be converted to multifunctional carbonates C by insertion of carbon dioxide, preferably in the presence of a catalyst.

[0021] A further source of multifunctional epoxides are ethers of multifunctional alcohols and glycidol, which are reacted with carbon dioxide in the known way to produce the multifunctional cyclocarbonates. Examples of these multifunctional cyclocarbonates made by insertion of carbon dioxide into glycidylethers of polyoxyethylene glycol having a degree of polymerisation from three to one hundred and fifty, the corresponding polyoxypropylene glycols, and random or block copolymers of these, polyoxybutylene glycols, as well as low molar mass polyols such as trimethylol ethane, trimethylol propane, trimethylolbutane, erythritol, pentaerythritol, and ditrimethylol ethane, ditrimethylol propane, ditrimethylol-butane, dierythritol, and dipentaerythritol.

[0022] A further preferred multifunctional cyclocarbonate can be formed from lignin L where both phenolic hydroxyl groups and aliphatic hydroxyl groups are first converted to oxalkylated derivatives by reaction thereof with glycerol carbonate to create aliphatic vicinal 1,2-diol structures, which diols D are then converted to cyclocarbonates by reaction thereof with linear carbonates such as dimethylcarbonate or diethylcarbonate, or by transesterification with cyclocarbonates such as ethylenecarbonate or propylenecarbonate. Kraft lignin, soda lignin, sulphite lignin, or the so-called organosolv lignin which latter is free from sulphur are preferably used in these reactions.

[0023] Other multifunctional cyclocarbonates can also be formed from tannins T. Tannins are a class of polyphenolic compounds that share a property, viz. binding to, and precipitation of, proteins and other classes of organic compounds such as amino acids and alkaloids. Their molar mass ranges from about 500 g/mol for esters of sugars and gallic or digallic acid, to about 20 kg/mol for proanthocyanidines. Basic chemical structures are derived from gallic acid (3,4,5-tri-hydroxybenzoic add), 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene (phloroglucinol), and flavan-3-ol. Naturally occurring tannins are found in leaf, bud, seed, root, and stem tissues. A structural differentiation for tannins has been proposed by Khanbabee and van Ree in Natural Product Reports 2001, vol. 18, pages 641 to 649, as Gallotannins, Ellagitannins, Complex Tannins and Condensed Tannins. Gallotannins are ester of gallic acid or its depsidic derivatives with (mostly sugar-based, catechin-based or terpenoid-based) polyols, Ellagitannins comprise acidic components based on ellagic acid (2,3,7,8-tetrahydroxy-chromeno[5,4,3,c,d,e]chromene-5,10-dione) and do not contain glycosidically linked catechin units, Complex Tannins are those in which a catechin unit is bound glycosidically to a gallotannin or ellagitannin unit, and Condensed Tannins are all oligomeric and polymeric proanthocyanidines formed via linkage of the C4-atom of one catechinunit with a C8- or C6-atom of the next monomeric catechin unit. The sugar-based polyols include, i.a., D-glucopyranose, D-hamamelose, sucrose, shikimic acid, and quercitols. They all comprise both phenolic and cycloaliphatic hydroxyl groups. Naturally occurring tannins are usually mixtures of at least two of these four classes. Like in lignins, their phenolic hydroxyl groups, and also aliphatic hydroxyl groups, can be converted to cyclocarbonates by reaction with glycerolcarbonate to form bis-hydroxyethyl derivatives that are cyclised in the following step by reaction with a linear or branched dialkylcarbonate or a cyclic alkylenecarbonate to form multifunctional cyclocarbonates.

[0024] In the same way, also novolaks can be converted under consumption of at least two of their phenolic hydroxyl groups to multifunctional cyclocarbonates by reaction of novolaks with glycerol cyclocarbonate to form bishydroxyalkyl novolaks in the first step, which hydroxyalkyl novolaks are then transesterified in a second step with further linear or cyclic carbonate to form a multifunctionalnovolak cyclocarbonate.

[0025] It is also possible to use 1,3-diols to form cyclocarbonates C6 that have six ring atoms (1,3-dioxane-2-ones), as depicted in Formula II

##STR00002##

where each of R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 is independently selected from the group consisting of H and alkyl groups having from one to six carbon atoms.

[0026] The novolaks N which can be used in the invention are low molar mass polymers derived from phenol or alkylphenols, where the alkyl groups have from one to twenty carbon atoms, or mixtures of both wherein preferably, phenol and at least one alkylphenol are present in the mixture, and formaldehyde. The alkyl group is linear or branched. The novolaks N usually have a dropping temperature of up to 150° C., as determined according to ASTM D566, and preferably, a number average molar mass M.sub.n of up to 2000 g/mol. This temperature, also referred to as “dropping point”, is also determined according to the method described in DIN EN ISO 2176:1995 (published 1997-05) “Petroleum Products—Lubricating Grease—Determination of Dropping Point”.

[0027] Crosslinked novolaks made by crosslinking novolaks N with multifunctional cyclocarbonates C or C6, or mixtures of both, can be used in all common applications such as adhesives and bonding, laminates, plywood and other composite wood products such as particle board, wafer board, fibre board and strand board, moulding compositions, protective coatings, in insulation materials, foundry and shell moulding materials, with preference in the following applications: as binders for abrasives, friction materials, mineral or stone fibres, refractories, textile felts, or as impregnation resins for paper, wood, fabricated wood, tissue and woven material.

[0028] Crosslinking is preferably effected by mixing the novolak N and the multifunctional cyclocarbonates C or C6, or mixtures of both, in mass ratios m.sub.N/(m.sub.C+m.sub.C6) of from 0.1 to 10, preferably from 0.3 to 3, and most preferred, from 0.4 to 2.5, where m.sub.N is the mass of the novolak N, and m.sub.C+m.sub.C6 is the sum of the masses of the multifunctional cyclocarbonates C and C6 used.

[0029] Crosslinked lignins made by crosslinking lignin L with multifunctional cyclocarbonates C or C6, or mixtures of both, can be used in all applications mentioned supra, preferably in the following applications: adhesives, impregnation resins for paper, wood, fabricated wood, tissue and woven material, and as binders for abrasives, friction materials, mineral or stone fibres, refractories, and textile felts.

[0030] Crosslinking is preferably effected by mixing the lignin L and the multifunctional cyclocarbonates C or C6, or mixtures of both, in mass ratios m.sub.L/(m.sub.C+m.sub.C6) of from 0.1 to 10, preferably from 0.3 to 3, and most preferred, from 0.4 to 2.5, where m.sub.L is the mass of the lignin L, and m.sub.C+m.sub.C6 is the sum of the masses of the multifunctional cyclocarbonates C and C6 used.

[0031] With preference, combinations of novolaks and lignin or tannin or both can be made by mixing of these materials, or by including lignin and/or tannin in the synthesis of a novolak by replacing at least a part of the phenol in the synthesis of a novolak, thus leading to lignin-modified novolaks or tannin-modified novolaks, or novolaks modified by both lignin and tannin. These modified novolaks or mixtures can be crosslinked in the same way with the multifunctional cyclocarbonates C or C6, or mixtures of both, as described supra.

[0032] The combination of lignin L as hydroxyfunctional organic compound with a curing agent which is a cyclocarbonate made from lignin is particularly preferred, as the similarity of both constituents leads to a homogeneous mixture of both constituents which facilitates the curing reaction. In the same way, the combination of a novolac resin with a multifunctional cyclocarbonate made from a novolak by reaction thereof with a monofunctional cyclocarbonate to form a hydroxyalkylated novolak which can then be reacted with a further dialkyl carbonate or alkylene carbonate to form a cyclocarbonated novolak has the same advantage of forming a homogeneous mixture of resin and curing agent. These two embodiments are therefore a preferred way of application of the inventive idea to a practical solution.

[0033] By using different chemical species as crosslinking agent, and as compound to be crosslinked, micro-heterogeneities can be created that impart a two-phase structure to the resulting crosslinked material that leads to improved toughness properties. Examples for formation of two-phase materials is a novolak that is crosslinked with a purely aliphatic multifunctional cyclocarbonate, such as those derived from epoxidised fatty oils, from dimer fatty acids such as those described in He, X. et al., Polymers 2018, 10, p. 262 et seq., and from epoxidised polydienes.

[0034] The organic compounds having phenolic hydroxyl groups that are cured or crosslinked with the multifunctional cyclic carbonates can also include low to intermediate molar mass compounds such as tannin T as mentioned supra, as tannin has also phenolic hydroxyl groups which easily react with cyclocarbonates under ring opening.

[0035] The invention is illustrated by the following examples which are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES

[0036] Lignins: Organosolv lignin was produced using a mixture of masses of 1 kg each of ethanol and of water in pulping of 0.5 kg of beech wood chips (OL) with a liquor to biomass mass ratio of 4:1, with an addition of 10 g of H.sub.2SO.sub.4 (0.5% of the mass of the solvent mixture). The technical lignins from Kraft pulping processes were obtained from Suzano (spruce/pine, KL), the soda lignin (wheat straw, SL) was purchased from Green Value, and sulphite lignin was purchased from Tembec. The organosolv lignin was used if not mentioned otherwise.

[0037] Tannin: Acacia mearnsii (Black wattle), obtained from Christian D. Markmann GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.

[0038] Novolaks: products having three different dropping points (T.sub.D=114° C.; 128° C.; and 135° C. as measured according to DIN ISO 2176) have been used in the experiments. The values cited in the examples apply to a novolak of T.sub.D=114° C., obtained from Prefere Resins Germany GmbH as “Novolak DP 114” unless stated differently.

[0039] Multifunctional cyclic carbonates: The multifunctional cyclic carbonates (e.g. poly(ethyleneglycol) dipropylene carbonate) were synthesised by a base catalysed one step reaction from the corresponding epoxides (in this case, poly(ethyleneglycol) diglycidyl ether) and CO.sub.2. The epoxides were obtained from Sigma Aldrich, Alfa Aesar and HOBUM Oleochemicals, and the catalysts (tetra-n-butylammoniumbromide and 1,8-diazabicyclo-[5.4.0]undec-7-ene) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and Alfa Aesar.

[0040] The experimental results are also illustrated in the figures, wherein

[0041] FIG. 1 shows elugrams from a size-exclusion chromatographic analysis where the elugrams of pure lignin (the reactant) and a polymer formed by reaction of lignin with the multifunctional cyclocarbonates BCC (difunctional; FIG. 1a) and TCC (trifunctional; FIG. 1b), catalysed by DBU, at 170° C., and a 12 h-reaction time are compared; the larger molecules formed in the reaction eluting before the smaller lignin molecules. In these elugrams of Example 22, the detector signal (usually based on refractive index, or visible light or UV absorption which signals are proportional to the mass fraction of the detected substance in the eluate) is plotted against the volume V. of the eluate. The dotted line represents the elugram of the lignin used, while the solid line represents the elugram of a reaction product of lignin with a bis-carbonate (FIG. 1a, BCC, see Example 16 infra) and a tris-carbonate (FIG. 1b, TCC, see Example 17 infra), catalysed with DBU (see infra), both reacted at 170° C. for 12 h. Dimethylsulfoxide with addition of lithium bromide in a mass fraction of 1% was used as eluent with a polymer standard service (PSS) column set PolarGel-M® (7.5×300 mm) and a guard column (8×50 mm). The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min at 60° C. 10 mg of the lignin and polymer samples were dissolved with a concentration of 1 mg/ml and shaken in the eluent for 24 h at room temperature. Detection was made using an RI detector (RI-71, Showa Denko) and an UV detector (UV-2077+, Jasco).

[0042] FIG. 2 shows the thermal behaviour of mixtures of multifunctional cyclic carbonates, novolak (2 b) or lignin (2a), BCC and catalyst (DBU) of examples 8 and 10. The lower line shows the base line. The upper curve which, of course, is not reversible, shows the exotherm heat flow during the curing reaction. In these graphs, the reaction of multifunctional cyclic carbonates with novolak and lignin was examined thermoanalytically by temperature-modulated differential scanning calorimetry (DSC-TOPEM®). The samples were measured with a multi-frequency temperature modulation technique at a heating rate of 2 K/min from 50° C. to 250° C. in a N.sub.2 atmosphere. It was found that, depending on the mixture composition, novolak and lignin react with the multifunctional cyclic carbonates in an exothermic crosslinking reaction in a temperature range from about 150° C. to 240° C. The exemplary thermograms show the corresponding exothermic and non-reversing signals. In further experiments, it was also shown that the crosslinking temperature depends on the amount of catalyst. The more DBU was added to the mixture (in an amount of substance-ratio n(DBU)/n(cyclocarbonate groups) between 0 mol/mol to 0.1 mol/mol), the lower the corresponding crosslinking temperature and the higher the intensity of the exothermic and non-reversing signals in the thermogram.

[0043] FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate FTIR spectroscopic investigations of the crosslinking reaction with multifunctional cyclic carbonates. The conversion of the cyclic carbonate function by ring opening and CO.sub.2 evolution during the crosslinking reaction was monitored by FTIR spectroscopy. In these figures, the intensity of the FTIR signal at approximately 1794 cm.sup.−1 which is caused by the C—O stretching mode of the cyclic carbonate function, was examined as a function of the reaction temperature in a range of from 25° C. (room temperature, “RT”)up to 250° C. Mixtures of lignin, multifunctional cyclic carbonates (in mass ratios of 1:1) and catalyst were each heated for one hour at different temperatures. The obtained FTIR spectra were plotted against the reaction temperature (FIG. 3a, left). It can be seen that the intensity of the carbonate band decreases with increasing reaction temperature. Accordingly, a conversion of the carbonate function can be assumed. The FTIR absorbance at 1794 cm.sup.−1 has been plotted against the reaction temperature (FIG. 3b, right). The absorbance decreases from a temperature of about 150° C. and reaches a plateau at about 220° C. It can be assumed that a crosslinking reaction takes place in this temperature range and the ring opening proceeds faster at higher temperatures under the given conditions.

[0044] Corresponding experiments with mixtures of novolaks, multifunctional cyclic carbonates (in a mass ratio of 1:1) and catalyst showed similar results (FIGS. 4a and 4b).

[0045] In FIGS. 5 to 9, results of adhesion tests have been illustrated. The shear strength as was determined by Automated Bonding Evaluation System (“ABES”). Beech veneer strips had been conditioned in a standardised climate (25° C., 65% relative air humidity) and were coated with adhesive in an areic density of 100 g/m.sup.2. The veneers were then pressed at 150° C. for nine minutes (540 s). A standard phenolic resin was used as reference.

[0046] FIG. 5 shows examples of ABES tests with mixtures of lignin, lignin prepolymer and TCC in different mixing ratios. Shear strengths of about 4 MPa (4 N/mm.sup.2) have been obtained with a mass ratio of the said components of approximately 1:1:1.

[0047] FIG. 6 shows the ABES test results obtained for mixtures of lignin prepolymer, lignin, TCC, adipic acid and soy protein isolate in different mixing ratios. Shear strengths of about 4 MPa (4 N/mm.sup.2) were obtained with a mass fraction of lignin prepolymer between 20% and 30%. Furthermore, it was found that the addition of soy protein isolate or of adipic acid in a mass fraction of up to 20% in the mixture, respectively, does not lead to a significant reduction or to an enhancement of the adhesion under the given conditions, measured by the shear strength as.

[0048] FIG. 7 shows the ABES test results of a further test series where the shear strength as of different mixtures containing lignin prepolymer, lignin, TCC, adipic acid, and chickpea flour (“KEM”) were examined. Mixtures with a mass fraction w(LP) of lignin prepolymer of from approximately 20% to 40%, a mass fraction w(L) of lignin of approximately 20%, and a mass fraction w(TCC) of TCC of approximately from 30% to 40% led to shear strength a, of more than 4 MPa (4 N/mm.sup.2). The addition of KEM or adipic acid in a mass fraction of up to 40%, respectively, did not increase or decrease the adhesion significantly under the given conditions, measured by the shear strength as.

[0049] FIG. 8 provides a comparison of the shear strength a, measured in the ABES tests for the optimum compositions from the tests in FIGS. 6 and 7 using: [0050] lignin L, lignin prepolymer LP, and TCC (leftmost bar 1), [0051] lignin L, lignin prepolymer LP, TCC, adipic acid ADA, and chickpea flour KEM (second bar 2), [0052] lignin L, lignin prepolymer LP, and TCC (leftmost bar), adipic acid ADA, and soybean protein isolate SPI (third bar 3), and [0053] a reference which is a phenolic resin (novolak DP 114 cured with hexamethylene tetramine, rightmost bar 4).

[0054] Adipic acid was always added in the form of an aqueous solution (mass m(ADA) of adipic acid in a volume V of solution: the mass concentration β(ADA) is approximately 28 g/L at 25° C.).

[0055] FIG. 9 shows the results of determination of the longitudinal tensile shear strength test according to DIN EN 302-1, where beech wood panels with a length of 340 mm, a width of 150 mm, and a thickness of 5 mm were conditioned in a standardised climate (25° C., 65% relative air humidity), and bonded with adhesive mixtures applied in an areic density of 150 g/m.sup.2 at a pressure of 0.3 MPa and at a temperature of 180° C. for 60 min. After storage for seven days in the standardised climate, test specimens with a size of 150×20 mm.sup.2 were cut. The shear strength as was measured using a Zwick Z050 testing machine with a speed of 4 mm/min.

[0056] The shear strength of mixtures of lignin prepolymer LP, unmodified lignin L, and cyclic carbonate TCC with a mass mixing ratio of approx. 1:1:1 in the mixture reached approximately 6 MPa (6 N/mm.sup.2; left bar 1). For the reference sample using a standard phenolic resin (novolak DP 114 cured with hexamethylene tetramine, right bar 2), a value of approximately 11 MPa (11 N/mm.sup.2) was found.

[0057] Standard deviations found for these results depicted in FIGS. 8 and 9 are indicated as “I” intervals in these bars.

Example 1

[0058] In a series of experiments, the mass ratios of the constituents in a mixture of novolak, poly(ethyleneglycol) dipropylene carbonate (having a number average molar mass of ca. 400 g/mol, nonaethylene glycol, diether with glycerol-1,2-carbonate, “BCC”) and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (“DBU”) were varied (from 1.0 g to 5.0 g of novolak, from 1.0 g to 5.0 g of BCC, and from 0 g to 0.1 g of DBU). The mixtures were cured by heating to 190° C. for 1 h. The obtained products showed very low solubility in water, ethanol and acetone. Further details can be found in tables 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Example 2

[0059] In a series of experiments, the mass ratios of the constituents in a mixture of novolak, trimethylolpropane tripropylenecarbonate (trimethylolpropane, triether with glycerol-1,2-carbonate, “TCC”) and DBU were varied (from 1.0 g to 5.0 g of novolak, from 1.0 g to 5.0 g of TCC, and from 0 g to 0.15 g of DBU). The mixtures were cured by heating to 190° C. for 1 h. It could be shown that mixtures with mass fractions of TCC of from 40% to 70%, of novolak of from 30% to 60%, and of DBU of from 0.1% to 10% are particularly suitable for the crosslinking reaction. The obtained products showed very low solubility in water, ethanol and acetone. Further details can be found in tables 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Example 3

[0060] In a series of experiments, the mass ratios of the constituents in a mixture of novolak, carbonated soybean oil (made from epoxidised soy bean oil by converting the epoxide rings to cyclocarbonate, having approximately six carbonate groups per molecule, “CSBO”) and DBU were varied (from 1.0 g to 5.0 g of novolak, from 1.0 g to 5.0 g of CSBO, and from 0 g to 0.1 g of DBU). The mixtures were cured by heating to 190° C. for 1 h. It could be shown that mixtures with mass fractions of CSBO of from 50% to 70%, of novolak of from 30% to 50%, and of DBU of from 0.1% to 10% are particularly suitable for the crosslinking reaction. The obtained products showed very low solubility in water, ethanol and acetone. Further details can be found in tables 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Example 4

[0061] A mixture of 0.83 g of novolak, 1.3 g of TCC, and 0.15 g of DBU was completely cured by heating to 190° C. for 1 h. The adhesive strength was determined by different methods including screen tests and tensile shear strength tests. The tests showed very good results.

[0062] Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Example 5

[0063] A mixture of 0.90 g of novolak, 1.1 g of BCC, and 0.15 g of DBU was completely cured by heating to 190° C. for 1 h. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed very good results. Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Example 6

[0064] A mixture of 0.90 g of novolak, 1.2 g of CSBO, and 0.15 g of DBU was completely cured at 190° C. for 1 h. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results.

[0065] Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed very good results. Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Example 7

[0066] A mixture of 0.80 g of novolak, 1.2 g of TCC, and 0.05 g of DBU was completely cured by heating to 190° C. for 1 h. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results. Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Example 8

[0067] A mixture of 1.0 g of novolak, 1.0 g of BCC, and 0.05 g of DBU was completely cured by heating to 190° C. for 1 h. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results. Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

[0068] Examples with Lignin and Multifunctional Cyclic Carbonates

Example 9

[0069] A mixture of 3.0 g of lignin, 1.5 g of poly(ethyleneglycol) dipropylenecarbonate and 0.1 g of DBU was stirred at 170° C. for 8 h. The product mixture was washed several times with dimethyl sulfoxide (“DMSO”) as well as water and dried in a vacuum oven at 30° C. The yield of the obtained polymer product was 77% (3.45 g).

Example 10

[0070] A mixture of 0.75 g of lignin, 1.5 g of poly(ethyleneglycol) dipropylenecarbonate and 0.05 g of DBU was stirred at 170° C. for 5 h. The product mixture was washed several times with DMSO as well as water and dried in a vacuum oven at 30° C. The yield of the obtained polymer product was 66% (1.48 g).

Example 11

[0071] A mixture of 0.77 g of lignin, 1.6 g of carbonated soybean oil and 0.05 g of DBU was stirred at 170° C. for 8 h. The product mixture was washed several times with DMSO as well as water and dried in a vacuum oven at 30° C. The yield of the obtained polymer product was 21% (0.50 g).

Example 12

[0072] In a series of experiments, the amount of CSBO was varied from 0.2 g to 1.0 g in a mixture of 1.0 g of lignin and 1.3 g of water. The mixtures were cured by heating to 150° C. for 3 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results. Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Example 13

[0073] In a series of experiments, the amount of DBU was varied from 0 g to 0.35 g in a mixture of 1.0 g of lignin, 1.0 g of CSBO, and 1.3 g of water. The mixtures were cured by heating to 150° C. for 3 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results. Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Example 14

[0074] A mixture of 2.0 g of lignin, 1.0 g of TTC, and 3.5 g of water was completely cured at 150° C. for 3 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results. Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Example 15

[0075] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin, 1.5 g of TTC, and 0.4 g of DBU was completely cured at 190° C. for 30 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results. Further details can be found in tables 3, 4, and 5, and in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

[0076] Examples of Single Step Syntheses of Carbonate Modified Lignin Prepolymers

Example 16

[0077] A mixture of 30.0 g of lignin, 203 g of BCC, and 1.00 g of DBU was stirred at 170° C. for 12 h. This single step reaction led to a highly viscous fluid. Size Exclusion Chromatography (“SEC”) elugrams showed that the molar mass of the product thus obtained (solid line) is a multiple of the molar mass of the used lignin (dotted line; see SEC elugram in FIG. 1a). FTIR analyses showed that the product contained multiple cyclic carbonate functionalities. Therefore, it is suitable as prepolymer for further reactions.

Example 17

[0078] A mixture of 16.3 g of lignin, 225 g of TCC, and 1.00 g of DBU was stirred at 170° C. for 12 h. A highly viscous resin with multiple cyclic carbonate functionalities and highly increased molar mass was obtained. See SEC elugram in FIG. 1b.

Example 18

[0079] A mixture of 19.2 g of lignin, 183 g of CSBO, and 1.00 g of DBU was stirred at 170° C. for 12 h. A viscous resin with multiple cyclic carbonate functionalities and increased molar mass was obtained.

Example 19

[0080] In a series of experiments, the mass ratios of the constituents in a mixture of lignin, BCC and DBU were varied (10 g of lignin, from 50 g to 150 g of BCC, and from 0.2 g to 0.6 g of DBU). All products obtained were viscous fluids with increased molar masses and feature multiple cyclic carbonate functionalities. It could be shown that the viscosity depends on the mass ratio of the constituents of the starting mixture. The lower the amount of BCC, the higher was the viscosity of the product.

Example 20

[0081] A mixture of 20 g of lignin, 200 g of BCC, and 5.5 g of DBU was stirred at 160° C. for 6 h. A highly viscous resin with multiple cyclic carbonate functionalities and highly increased molar mass was obtained.

Example 21

[0082] A mixture of 20 g of lignin, 200 g of CSBO, and 5.5 g of DBU was stirred at 160° C. for 6 h. A highly viscous resin with multiple cyclic carbonate functionalities and highly increased molar mass was obtained.

Example 22 SEC Analysis of Carbonate Modified Lignin Prepolymer Synthesis

[0083] The carbonate modified lignin prepolymer products obtained by single step synthesis were examined by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). The elugrams in FIGS. 1a and 1b show that the molar mass of the products is several times higher than the molar mass of the lignin starting compound. Accordingly, it can be assumed that individual lignin molecules have reacted with multifunctional carbonates to form lignin-based higher molar mass oligomers. These highly viscous resins serve as prepolymers for further reactions in the following examples and are hereinafter referred to as “lignin prepolymers”.

[0084] Examples with Novolak and Carbonate Modified Lignin Prepolymers

[0085] In these examples, the remaining cyclocarbonate groups of the “lignin prepolymers” react also with the novolak in the presence of the catalyst (DBU) and thereby lead to crosslinking of the mixtures.

Example 23

[0086] A mixture of 1.0 g of novolak, 1.0 g of lignin prepolymers, and 20 mg of DBU was completely cured at 220° C. for 30 min. The obtained products showed low solubility in water, ethanol, DMSO and acetone. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermogram of a corresponding mixture shows an exothermic signal in a temperature range from 190° C. to 240° C.

Example 24

[0087] A mixture of 1.0 g of novolak, 1.0 g of lignin prepolymers, and 40 mg of DBU was completely cured at 220° C. for 30 min. The obtained products showed low solubility in water, ethanol, DMSO and acetone. The DSC thermogram of a corresponding mixture shows an exothermic signal in a temperature range from 180° C. to 230° C.

Example 25

[0088] A mixture of 1.0 g of novolak and 1.0 g of lignin prepolymers without addition of catalyst (DBU) was completely cured at 220° C. for 30 min. The obtained products showed low solubility in water, ethanol, DMSO and acetone. The DSC thermogram of a corresponding mixture shows an exothermic signal in a temperature range from 190° C. to 240° C.

[0089] Examples with Lignin and Carbonate Modified Lignin Prepolymers

Example 26

[0090] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of unmodified lignin, 1.0 g of TCC, and 0.1 g of tetra-n-butylammoniumbromide (“TBAB”) was completely cured by heating to 170° C. for 9 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed very good results. Further details regarding adhesive strength tests can be found in table 5.

Example 27

[0091] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of unmodified lignin, 1.5 g of TCC, 1.0 g of soy protein isolate (“SPI”), 0.5 g of adipic acid, and 0.2 g of KOH was completely cured by heating to 170° C. for 9 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results. Further details regarding adhesive strength tests can be found in table 5.

Example 28

[0092] A mixture of 1.5 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of unmodified lignin, 1.5 g of TCC, 1.0 g of chickpea flour (“KEM”), and 0.2 g of KOH was completely cured by heating to 170° C. for 9 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results. Further details regarding adhesive strength tests can be found in table 5.

Example 29

[0093] A mixture of 5.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 5.0 g of unmodified lignin, and 5.0 g of TCC was completely cured by heating to 180° C. for 17 min. Adhesive strength tests showed very good results. Further details regarding adhesive strength tests can be found in table 5.

Example 30

[0094] A mixture of 0.5 g of lignin prepolymer, 0.5 g of unmodified lignin, and 0.5 g of CSBO was completely cured by heating to 190° C. for 2 h. Adhesive strength tests showed good results.

Example 31

[0095] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of BCC, 1.0 g of SPI and 40 mg of DBU was completely cured by heating to 180° C. for 30 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results.

Example 32

[0096] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of BCC and 1.0 g of SPI was completely cured by heating to 180° C. for 30 min. Adhesive strength tests with corresponding mixtures showed good results.

[0097] Examples with Tannin and Carbonate Modified Lignin Prepolymers

Example 33

[0098] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of unmodified tannin, 1.0 g of TCC, and 0.4 g of DBU was completely cured by heating to 190° C. for 30 min. The DSC thermogram of a corresponding mixture showed an exothermic signal in a temperature range from 130° C. to 230° C.

Example 34

[0099] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of unmodified tannin, 1.0 g of TCC, and 0.2 g of DBU was completely cured by heating to 190° C. for 30 min. The DSC thermogram of a corresponding mixture shows an exothermic signal in a temperature range from 140° C. to 240° C.

Example 35

[0100] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of unmodified tannin, 1.0 g of BCC, and 0.4 g of DBU was completely cured by heating to 190° C. for 30 min. The DSC thermogram of a corresponding mixture shows an exothermic signal in a temperature range from 130° C. to 230° C.

Example 36

[0101] A mixture of 1.0 g of lignin prepolymer, 1.0 g of unmodified tannin, and 1.0 g of BCC was completely cured without addition of catalyst by heating to 190° C. for 30 min. The DSC thermogram of a corresponding mixture shows an exothermic signal in a temperature range from 140° C. to 240° C.

[0102] Examples with Variation of the Amount of the Catalyst

Example 37

[0103] In a series of experiments, the amount of the catalyst DBU was varied from 0 g to 0.40 g in a mixture of 0.10 g of lignin and 0.15 g of TCC. The DSC thermograms show a significant dependence on the amount of the catalyst. The higher the amount of the catalyst, the lower is the temperature of the exothermic signals indicating the crosslinking reaction. The exothermic DSC signals range from 130° C. to 240° C. The intensity of the exothermic signals also increases with an increasing amount of catalyst. Further details concerning thermoanalytical investigations can be found in the corresponding section further below.

Example 38

[0104] In a series of experiments, the amount of the catalyst DBU was varied from 0 g to 0.40 g in a mixture of 0.10 g of lignin and 0.15 g of BCC. The DSC thermograms show a significant dependence on the amount of the catalyst. The higher the amount of the catalyst, the lower is the temperature of the exothermic signals indicating the crosslinking reaction. The exothermic DSC signals range from 130° C. to 240° C. The intensity of the exothermic signals also increases with an increasing amount of catalyst.

Example 39

[0105] In a series of experiments, the amount of the catalyst DBU was varied from 0 g to 0.40 g in a mixture of 0.10 g of novolak and 0.15 g of TCC. The DSC thermograms show a significant dependency on the amount of the catalyst. The higher the amount of the catalyst, the lower is the temperature of the exothermic signals indicating the crosslinking reaction. The exothermic DSC signals range from 130° C. to 240° C. The intensity of the exothermic signals also increases with an increasing amount of catalyst.

Example 40

[0106] In a series of experiments, the amount of the catalyst DBU was varied from 0 g to 0.40 g in a mixture of 0.10 g of novolak and 0.15 g of BCC. The DSC thermograms show a significant dependence on the amount of the catalyst. The higher the amount of the catalyst, the lower is the temperature of the exothermic signals indicating the crosslinking reaction. The exothermic DSC signals range from 130° C. to 240° C. The intensity of the exothermic signals also increases with an increasing amount of catalyst.

[0107] Examples of Solubility Tests

[0108] It was tested under which conditions novolaks and lignin can be crosslinked with cyclic carbonates to form insoluble products. For this purpose, lignin, novolaks, cyclic carbonates (BCC, TCC and CSBO) and DBU were mixed in various proportions and combinations and heated at different temperatures.

[0109] The solvent DMSO was used for the solubility tests of the lignin-based products. It turned out that temperatures of at least 170° C. are necessary to obtain insoluble products from mixtures of lignin, cyclic carbonates (BCC and CSBO) and DBU under the tested conditions.

[0110] The solvents ethanol and acetone were used for the solubility tests of the novolak-based products. It has been found that mixtures of novolak, cyclic carbonates (BCC, TCC and CSBO) and DBU are converted to insoluble crosslinked products at temperatures of at least 150° C. under the given conditions. It also turned out that a mass fraction of CSBO of more than 50% is necessary to obtain insoluble products from mixtures containing novolak and CSBO.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Examples of solubility tests in DMSO with mixtures of lignin, cyclic carbonates (BCC and CSBO) and DBU as function of mass m of components, reaction temperature T.sub.r and reaction time t.sub.r m(Lignin) m(BCC) m(CSBO) M(DBU) T.sub.r t.sub.r solubility Test g g g g ° C. h in DMSO Solubility-test-01 3.0 1.5 — 0.10 25 (RT) 8 soluble Solubility-test-02 3.0 1.5 — 0.10 100 8 soluble Solubility-test-03 3.0 1.5 — 0.10 170 8 insoluble Solubility-test-04 2.3 2.3 — 0.10 170 8 insoluble Solubility-test-05 1.5 3.1 — 0.10 170 8 insoluble Solubility-test-06 0.75 1.5 — 0.054 150 1 soluble Solubility-test-07 0.77 1.5 — 0.053 170 1 insoluble Solubility-test-08 0.75 1.5 — 0.048 170 5 insoluble Solubility-test-09 0.79 1.6 — 0.046 170 8 insoluble Solubility-test-10 0.75 — 1.5 0.057 150 1 soluble Solubility-test-11 0.77 — 1.5 0.051 170 1 soluble Solubility-test-12 0.75 — 1.5 0.055 170 5 insoluble Solubility-test-13 0.77 — 1.6 0.05 170 8 insoluble

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Examples of solubility tests in ethanol and acetone with mixtures of novolak, cyclic carbonates (BCC, TCC and CSBO) and DBU as function of mass m of components, reaction temperature T.sub.r and reaction time t.sub.r m(DP114) m(BCC) m(TCC) m(CSBO) m(DBU) T.sub.r t.sub.r solubility in g g g g g ° C. h ethanol acetone Solubility-test-14 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 120 1 soluble soluble Solubility-test-15 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 130 1 soluble soluble Solubility-test-16 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 140 1 soluble soluble Solubility-test-17 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 150 1 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-18 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 160 1 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-19 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 170 1 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-20 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 180 1 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-21 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 190 1 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-22 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 200 1 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-23 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 210 1 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-24 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 220 1 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-25 0.80 1.2 — — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-26 0.90 1.1 — — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-27 0.95 1.05 — — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-28 1.0 1.0 — — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-29 1.05 0.95 — — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-30 1.1 0.9 — — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-31 1.2 0.8 — — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-32 0.80 — 1.2 — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-33 0.90 — 1.1 — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-34 0.95 — 1.05 — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-35 1.0 — 1.0 — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-36 1.05 — 0.95 — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-37 1.1 — 0.90 — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-38 1.2 — 0.80 — 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-39 0.80 — — 1.2 0.15 200 2 soluble soluble Solubility-test-40 0.90 — — 1.1 0.15 200 2 soluble soluble Solubility-test-41 0.95 — — 1.05 0.15 200 2 soluble soluble Solubility-test-42 1.0 — — 1.0 0.15 200 2 soluble soluble Solubility-test-43 1.05 — — 0.95 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-44 1.1 — — 0.90 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble Solubility-test-45 1.2 — — 0.80 0.15 200 2 insoluble insoluble

[0111] Examples of Adhesive Screening Tests

[0112] Adhesive tests of different mixtures were carried out in a screening process using beech wood specimens. For this purpose, the adhesive mixtures were applied to two wooden test pieces each, which were then pressed together and heated in the oven at 190° C. for two hours. The strength of the bond was tested manually after a cooling phase of two hours.

[0113] It has been shown that mixtures with novolaks and cyclic carbonate with a mass fraction of carbonate of from about 50% to 60% resulted in the highest bond strengths (Table 3). Furthermore, it was found that the adhesive strength of the mixtures depends on the DBU concentration. Mixtures of novolaks, cyclic carbonates and a mass fraction of DBU of 7.5% resulted in significantly higher strengths than corresponding mixtures with mass fractions of DBU of 0.25% (Table 4). This result corresponds to the results of the thermoanalytical investigations. Both methods show that the crosslinking process is significantly influenced by the amount of catalyst.

[0114] Further screening tests showed that mixtures of lignin prepolymer, lignin and cyclic carbonates led to excellent results in terms of adhesive strength (Table 5). It could also be shown that the addition of novolaks, chickpea flour (“KEM”), soy protein isolate (“SPI”), adipic acid (in aqueous solution) or glutaric acid (in aqueous solution) also gave excellent results.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Examples of adhesive strength pretests with mixtures of Novolak DP 114, cyclic carbonates (BCC, TCC or CSBO) and additional DBU catalyst as function of the mass of these components DP 114 BCC TCC CSBO Catalyst Adhesion m(DP114)/g m(BCC)/g m(TCC)/g m(CSBO)/g m(DBU)/g manual inspection Pretest-01 100 0 — — 0.25 none Pretest-02 65 35 — — 0.25 good Pretest-03 60 40 — — 0.25 good Pretest-04 55 45 — — 0.25 good Pretest-05 50 50 — — 0.25 excellent Pretest-06 45 55 — — 0.25 excellent Pretest-07 40 60 — — 0.25 excellent Pretest-08 35 65 — — 0.25 good Pretest-09 0 100 — — 0.25 none Pretest-10 100 — 0 — 0.25 none Pretest-11 65 — 35 — 0.25 none Pretest-12 60 — 40 — 0.25 good Pretest-13 55 — 45 — 0.25 good Pretest-14 50 — 50 — 0.25 good Pretest-15 45 — 55 — 0.25 good Pretest-16 40 — 60 — 0.25 excellent Pretest-17 35 — 65 — 0.25 good Pretest-18 0 — 100 — 0.25 none Pretest-19 100 — — 0 0.25 none Pretest-20 65 — — 35 0.25 none Pretest-21 60 — — 40 0.25 none Pretest-22 55 — — 45 0.25 none Pretest-23 50 — — 50 0.25 none Pretest-24 45 — — 55 0.25 none Pretest-25 40 — — 60 0.25 excellent Pretest-26 35 — — 65 0.25 good Pretest-27 0 — — 100 0.25 none

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Examples of adhesive strength pretests with mixtures of Novolak DP 114, carbonates (BCC or TCC) and additional DBU catalyst as function of the mass of these components Novolak BCC TCC Catalyst Adhesive Strength Test Code m(DP 114)/g m(BCC)/g m(TCC)/g m(DBU)/g (Manual Inspection) Pretest-28 40 60 — 7.5 excellent Pretest-29 45 55 — 7.5 excellent Pretest-30 47.5 52.5 — 7.5 excellent Pretest-31 50 50 — 7.5 excellent Pretest-32 55 45 — 7.5 excellent Pretest-33 35 — 65 7.5 excellent Pretest-34 40 — 60 7.5 excellent Pretest-35 42.5 — 57.5 7.5 excellent Pretest-36 45 — 55 7.5 good Pretest-37 50 — 50 7.5 good

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Examples of adhesive strength pretests with mixtures of lignin prepolymer, carbonates (BCC, TCC and CSBO), lignin, novolak DP 114, chickpea flour KEM, soybean protein isolate SPI, adipic acid ADA, and glutaric acid GA as function of the mass of these components Test lignin adipic glutaric Code prepolymer BCC TCC CSBO Lignin Novolak KONA SPI acid acid pretest m(LP)/g m(BCC)/g m(TCC)/g m(CSBO)/g m(L)/g m(N)/g m(KEM)/g m(SPI)/g m(ADA)/g m(GA)/g Adhesion 38 50.5 — 10.0 — 39.5 — — — — — excellent 39 33.4 — 33.4 — 33.2 — — — — — excellent 40 28.2 — 31.3 — 40.5 — — — — — excellent 41 39.1 — 27.2 — 33.7 — — — — — excellent 42 21.0 — 20.0 — 20.0 — 20.2 — — 18.9 excellent 43 20.7 — 20.4 — 21.1 — 19.5 — 18.4 — excellent 44 11.0 — 29.1 — 17.6 — 22.8 — 19.5 — excellent 45 31.5 — 11.8 — 19.2 — 18.0 — 19.5 — excellent 46 9.7 — 21.4 — 19.6 — 30.3 — 19.0 — excellent 47 19.6 — 16.8 — 16.8 — 19.2 — 27.5 — excellent 48 22.5 — 22.2 — 17.3 — 20.7 — 17.4 — excellent 49 25.1 — 25.1 — 25.9 — — 23.9 — — excellent 50 33.9 — — — — 33.0 33.1 — — — excellent 51 34.0 — — — — — 33.3 — 32.7 — none 52 51.2 — — — — — — — 48.8 — none 53 35.5 — — — — — — 32.0 32.4 — none 54 50.0 — — — — — — 25.6 24.4 — none 55 49.7 — — — — — — 50.3 — — none 56 36.9 — — — — — — 30.2 — 32.9 none 57 50.8 — — — — — — — — 49.2 none 58 — 49.6 — — — — — 50.4 — — none 59 — 51.1 — — — — — — — 48.9 none 60 — 51.3 — — — — — — 48.7 — none 61 — — 48.9 — — — — 51.1 — — none 62 — — 19.1 — 25.9 — 25.8 — 29.2 — none 63 — — 20.6 — 25.8 — 27.7 — — 26.0 none 64 — — — 50.7 — — — — — 49.3 none 65 — — — 49.9 — — — — 50.1 — none 66 — — — 49.4 — — — 50.6 — — none