Optimized pharmaceutical formulation for the treatment of inflammatory conditions of the esophagus

Abstract

Disclosed is an optimized pharmaceutical formulation for the treatment of inflammatory conditions of the esophagus. A pharmaceutical formulation in the form of an orodispersible effervescent tablet is stable, easy to produce, and can be used without dissolving same in a liquid. It is not necessary to drink anything with the tablet as this would reduce the time that the budesonide solution remains in the affected regions of the esophagus. The effervescent tablet of the invention surprisingly resulted in an unexpectedly high rate of histological remission in patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis.

Claims

1. An orodispersible effervescent tablet formulated to release budesonide in an oral cavity for a period of 1.5 minutes to 2 minutes, said tablet comprising: a. 0.25 mg to 5 mg of budesonide, and b. a gas generating system comprising (i) a weak acid or salt thereof, and (ii) a salt of an acid that, in conjunction with a further acid, can release a gas and produce an effervescent reaction upon contact with saliva, wherein said effervescent reaction provides a concentrated distribution of budesonide targeted directly to one or more inflammatory regions of an esophageal mucosa while minimizing undesired absorption of budesonide into systemic circulation and/or through an oral mucosa.

2. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet further comprises 0.1% to 1.0% by weight sucralose, based on the weight of the finished tablet.

3. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet further comprises 0.01% to 0.2% by weight docusate sodium, based on the weight of the finished tablet.

4. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet further comprises polyvinylpyrrolidone.

5. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet further comprises mannitol.

6. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet further comprises macrogol 6000.

7. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet further comprises magnesium stearate.

8. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet has a diameter of 5 to 10 mm.

9. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet has a height of 1.5 to 3.0 mm.

10. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet has a mass of 100 mg to 200 mg.

11. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet has a fracture strength of 10 N to 100 N.

12. The tablet of claim 1, wherein said tablet has a friability of at most 5%.

13. The tablet of claim 1, wherein (b)(i) comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable weak acid or salt thereof that decreases the pH value in an aqueous solution, and (b)(ii) comprises a salt of a pharmacologically acceptable acid.

14. The tablet of claim 13, wherein (b)(i) is selected from the group consisting of tartaric acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, and citric acid.

15. The tablet of claim 13, wherein (b)(i) is selected from the group consisting of sodium, magnesium, and calcium salts of tartaric acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, or citric acid.

16. The tablet of claim 13, wherein (b)(i) is selected from the group consisting of disodium citrate, monosodium citrate, and mixtures thereof.

17. The tablet of claim 13, wherein (b)(ii) is a salt of carbonic acid.

18. The tablet of claim 13, wherein (b)(ii) is selected from the group consisting of carbonates and hydrogen carbonates.

19. The tablet of claim 13, wherein (b)(ii) is selected from the group consisting of NaHCO.sub.3, Na.sub.2CO.sub.3, KHCO.sub.3, K.sub.2CO.sub.3, CaCO.sub.3, and mixtures thereof.

20. An orodisperisble effervescent tablet formulated to deliver budesonide directly to an esophageal mucosa in a subject in need thereof, said tablet comprising: a. 0.1 to 20 mg budesonide; and b. a gas generating system comprising (i) a weak acid or salt thereof, and (ii) a salt of an acid that, in conjunction with a further acid, can release a gas; wherein said gas generating system generates an effervescent reaction upon contact with saliva that causes said tablet to disintegrate into a plurality of small budesonide-containing particles that, in turn, suspend in saliva, further wherein said particle-containing saliva, when swallowed, is relatively uniformly distributed on the subject's esophagus to form a budesonide-containing adhesion that provides a concentrated distribution of budesonide targeted directly to inflammatory regions of the subject's esophageal mucosa while minimizing absorption through the subject's oral mucosa.

21. The tablet of claim 20, wherein localized budesonide delivery extends for 1.5 to 2 minutes.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) FIG. 1 presents a bar graph depicting the mean load with eosinophils, measured as a mean number of eosinophils/mm.sup.2 hpf, in the proximal, the central (Mid) and the distal esophageal segments subsequent to treatment with an orodispersible, budesonide-containing effervescent tablet of the present invention (BUET), either as a twice-daily dose of one tablet with 1 mg of active ingredient (BUET 2×1 mg) or as a twice-daily dose of one tablet with 2 mg of active ingredient (BUET 2×2 mg), as compared to a Placebo.

(2) FIG. 2 presents a bar graph depicting the mean total endoscopic intensity score subsequent to the two treatments (BUET 2×1 mg and BUET 2×2 mg) as compared to a Placebo.

(3) FIG. 3 graphically depicts the long-lasting clinical effect subsequent to the two treatments (BUET 2×1 mg and BUET 2×2 mg) as compared to a Placebo.

(4) FIG. 4 graphically demonstrate the frequency of dysphagia events subsequent to the two treatments (BUET 2×1 mg and BUET 2×2 mg) as compared to a Placebo.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(5) An essential component of the orodispersible effervescent tablet is a system that can generate a gas in the presence of saliva so as to achieve the effervescent effect. It is required that said gas generating system is pharmaceutically acceptable. On the one hand, such a gas generating system is comprised of a weak acid or a salt of a weak acid, respectively. In the presence of water the free weak acid arises from this. However, the acid must not be too strong in order to avoid health problems. This may be tartaric acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, and more preferably citric acid. Usually, the salts of the acids are used, i.e. for example sodium, magnesium, or calcium salts. The other component of the gas generating system is comprised of a salt of an acid that in conjunction with a further acid can release a gas. Preferably, these are salts of the carbonic acid. These may be carbonates or hydrogen carbonates, such as for example sodium or potassium carbonate or sodium or potassium hydrogen carbonates or calcium carbonates as well as mixtures of these salts. It is essential that a gas perfectly safe for health, namely CO.sub.2, is released in small amount during use of the effervescent tablet. The gas is released by the interaction of the gas generating components with the saliva.

(6) An orodispersible effervescent tablet according to the invention has a mass that is between 100 mg and 200 mg, preferably the orodispersible effervescent tablets have a mass of 120 mg to 160 mg. Most preferred embodiments of the orodispersible effervescent tablets have a mass of 133 mg to 147 mg.

(7) Also the size of the effervescent tablet according to the invention is essential. Preferably, the effervescent tablets have a diameter between 5 and 10 mm. Preferably, the effervescent tablets are round, although a very round shape being not necessarily required. Deviations from the round shape may also be selected. Preferably, the effervescent tablets are biplane with the diameter preferably being between 6.0 and 8.0 mm, and more preferably between 6.9 and 7.3 mm. The height of the orodispersible effervescent tablet is preferably between 1.5 and 3.0 mm, more preferably between 1.6 and 2.8 mm, and most preferably between 1.8 and 2.6 mm.

(8) As to the mechanical properties of the orodispersible effervescent tablet these are essential. The fracture strength of the effervescent tablet is preferably between a value of 10 and 100 N, more preferably between 20 N and 70 N, and is preferably determined according to the European Pharmacopoeia in accordance with the 2.9.8. monography.

(9) During the test of the mechanical strength of tablets the solid specimen is clamped between two plungers or a plunger and an anvil. Then, a force is applied to the specimen (tablet) and the force required to cause a break in the tablet is determined. Determination of the fracture strength of the orodispersible effervescent tablet according to the invention can be performed for example with fully automatic test devices. For example, such test systems are offered by Pharmatest under the designation WHT 3ME. Of course, equivalent test apparatus can also be used.

(10) The preferable fracture strength on the one hand allows a good and reproducible industrial manufacture, but also a sufficient mechanical stability. According to the invention, the orodispersible effervescent tablets have a friability (abrasion strength) of at most 5%, preferably at most 1%. The friability (abrasion strength) is preferably determined in accordance with the European Pharmacopoeia according to the 2.9.7. monography.

(11) Shape, consistency, and mechanical properties of the orodispersible effervescent tablet are essential, since on the one hand the size and shape allow the continuous and relatively uniform dispersal in the presence of saliva. On the other hand, they allow a sufficient mechanical stability, so that the effervescent tablet in the normal use does not prematurely break into pieces and because of that a use according to the invention is no longer possible. The properties of the orodispersible effervescent tablet have the effect that no foreign-body sensation develops in the mouth and thus, the use is found to be subjectively pleasant by the patient.

(12) The properties of the effervescent tablet described in the particularly preferred embodiment allow the variable single dose administration of budesonide in an amount of preferably 0.5 to 3 mg of budesonide. Here, the amount of active ingredient processed has no effect on the described quality parameters that are relevant for the use, such as size, shape, and mechanical stability. Dividing the tablet is not necessary, rather one tablet corresponds to the dose to be used.

(13) The less the dose of budesonide in the effervescent tablet, the higher the demands on the selection of suitable excipients for ensuring a sufficient long-term stability of the dosage form. Then, an undesired decomposition of the active ingredient would be particularly undesired if low doses are administered, because then the pharmaceutically sufficient amount of the active ingredient would no longer be present in the tablets. Surprisingly, it was shown that the physicochemical stability of budesonide in the effervescent tablet is only allowed by the composition according to the invention. Even if individual excipients are part of the prior art of effervescent tablets, preferably only exactly with the qualitative and quantitative composition according to the invention a long-term stability of the dosage form of up to 36 months for all dosage strengths of a budesonide effervescent tablet for orodispersible use is possible. The effervescent tablets according to the invention can be stored at room temperature.

(14) In a preferred embodiment, an orodispersible effervescent tablet according to the invention contains a polyvinylpyrrolidone. These are polymerization products of the vinylpyrrolidone. The low molecular polyvinylpyrrolidones are hygroscopic, according to the invention it is particularly preferred to use the povidone K25. It is also possible to use derivatives of polyvinylpyrrolidone that are known in this field. The amount of polyvinylpyrrolidone used (for example povidone K25) is preferably 1 to 10, more preferably 1.5 to 3.5% by weight, based on the finished tablet.

(15) It is required for the orodispersible effervescent tablet according to the invention to have a pleasant taste. Thus, in a preferred embodiment there is added a substance that leaves a sweet taste upon dissolution in the mouth. Since the use of sucrose can be detrimental, preferably an alternative sweetener is used. In a preferred embodiment this is sucralose. Sucralose is sucrose with the hydroxyl residues being replaced by chlorine atoms. Compared to sucrose sucralose is significantly sweeter. However, the manufacturing conditions and other constituents of the orodispersible effervescent tablet have to be adjusted such that no dispersal of the sucralose occurs that could lead to undesired discolorations. In the orodispersible effervescent tablet the proportion of sucralose preferably is between 0.1 and 1.0% by weight, more preferably between 0.2 and 0.6% by weight, based on the finished tablet.

(16) A further preferably used constituent of the orodispersible effervescent tablet is docusate sodium. This is a white, wax-like substance that is used as a solubilization and emulsifying agent in particular to the active ingredient budesonide. The amount of docusate sodium preferably is between 0.01 and 0.2% by weight, more preferably 0.02 to 0.15% by weight, based on the finished tablet.

(17) A further preferably used excipient is mannitol. The mannitol used in accordance with the invention in preferred embodiment is a polymorph, crystalline solid. The two most often characterized modifications are β and α mannitol that are also designated as modifications I and II. As further modification there was also described δ mannitol. For the manufacture of the orodispersible effervescent tablets according to the invention the properties of the excipients, particularly that of the mannitol, have to meet special requirements. On the one hand it is required that the powder mixtures during the manufacture have a good flowability, on the other hand an optimum compactness is essential, i.e. the ability to form tablets of high strength with low compacting force. Here, the particle size distribution of the individual mannitol crystals can play a central role. According to the invention there is preferably used an amount of 2.0 to 10.0% by weight, more preferably 4.0 to 7.0% by weight of mannitol, based on the finished tablet.

(18) A further important excipient that is preferably used in accordance with the invention are polyethylene glycols. In a preferred embodiment macrogol 6000 is used in an amount of 1.0 to 10% by weight, preferably 2.0 to 7.0% by weight, based on the finished tablet.

(19) A further preferred excipient component is magnesium stearate that is preferably used in an amount of 0.01 to 0.5% by weight, more preferably in an amount of 0.05 to 0.15% by weight.

(20) The components that achieve the effervescent effect in terms of the weight make up the main part of the orodispersible effervescent tablet. Here, in a preferred embodiment this is a mixture of disodium citrate, monosodium citrate as well as sodium hydrogen carbonate. Said effervescent mixture makes up a proportion of weight of about 70 to 95% by weight, preferably 85 to 92% by weight, based on the finished orodispersible effervescent tablet. It is especially the particle shape of the components of the effervescent mixture that is relevant for the mechanical properties of the orodispersible effervescent tablet. Thus, from the available qualities of the individual components there must be selected those which in cooperation with the other excipients and the pharmaceutically active ingredient budesonide can be compacted such that the properties of the finished orodispersible effervescent tablet, particularly the intended fracture strength and friability, can be achieved.

(21) Of course, all of the components of the orodispersible effervescent tablet must add up to 100% by weight.

(22) The orodispersible effervescent tablet according to the invention preferably can be used for the treatment but also for the prevention of inflammatory conditions of the esophagus. The formulation according to the invention allows a continuous delivery of the active ingredient that is pleasant for the patient and that is relatively uniformly distributed on the esophagus. Thus, the active ingredient budesonide is targetedly and efficiently topically brought to the inflammatory regions of the esophagus. The orodispersible effervescent tablets according to the invention are particularly preferably used for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.

(23) Preferred embodiments of the present invention are explained by the following examples.

EXAMPLE 1

(24) It was surprisingly found that a physicochemical stability of the budesonide effervescent tablets of up to 36 months as well as the quality parameters relevant for the use of the effervescent tablet such as size, shape, and mechanical stability can be achieved by the qualitative and quantitative composition given in table 1.

(25) In table 1, there are given particularly preferred concentration information of the components that are preferably used according to the invention. It has not necessarily fully been complied with the values given in the table. However, the essential components and the ratios of the individual components to each other are decisive for the advantageous properties of the orodispersible budesonide effervescent tablets according to the invention.

(26) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Composition of preferred budesonide effervescent tablets Composition [mg] Budesonide Budesonide Budesonide 0.5 mg 1 mg 2 mg Effervescent Effervescent Effervescent tablet tablet tablet Granulate Budesonide 0.50 1.00 2.00 Disodium citrate 67.00 67.00 67.00 Monosodium citrate 15.00 15.00 15.00 Sodium hydrogen 45.00 45.00 45.00 carbonate Povidone K25 2.00 2.00 2.00 Sucralose 0.30 0.30 0.30 Docusate sodium 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sum 129.85 130.35 131.35 Final mixture Mannitol 5.95 5.95 5.95 Macrogol 6000 5.00 5.00 5.00 Magnesium stearate 0.10 0.10 0.10 Sum 140.90 141.40 142.40

EXAMPLE 2

(27) The results of the durability tests of budesonide 1 mg effervescent tablets at different storage conditions are summarized in table 2. Compared to the initial values even during the storage under the conditions of loading tests no relevant changes were shown.

(28) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Stability results of budesonide 1 mg effervescent tablets Storage period at 25° C./60% relative humidity in months Initially 3 6 9 12 18 24 Fracture strength 36 33 35 35 36 36 35 [N] Dispersal in water 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.8 1.5 1.4 2.9 [Minutes] Content of budesonide 101.4 99.5 100.0 100.7 99.5 99.9 98.0 [%] Sum of total impurities <0.1 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.19 0.22 [%] Storage period at 30° C./65% relative humidity in months Initially 3 6 9 12 18 Fracture strength 36 37 34 36 34 28 [N] Dispersal in water 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.7 2.9 [Minutes] Content of budesonide 101.4 100.5 99.6 100.0 98.1 97.3 [%] Sum of total impurities <0.1 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.40 [%] Storage period at 40° C./75% relative humidity in months Initially 1 2 3 Fracture strength 36 21 36 38 [N] Dispersal in water 1.3 0.9 1.7 1.8 [Minutes] Content of budesonide 101.4 100.2 100.6 99.5 [%] Sum of total impurities <0.1 0.14 0.27 0.39 [%]

EXAMPLE 3

(29) Compared to the initial values especially during the storage under the condition of climatic zone II no relevant changes are shown. In contrast, the results of table 3 demonstrated that in case of only a slight deviation from this recipe (e.g. exchange of 0.40 mg sucralose with 1.0 mg aspartame) the long-term stability of the budesonide 1 mg effervescent tablets is no longer given. As the failed attempt reveals impressively, in case of a changed recipe the decomposition of budesonide after equally long storage periods increases by a factor of ca. 7. Since this decomposition turns out even more clearly with dosages of less than 1 mg of budesonide the physicochemical stability of the effervescent tablet is preferably given with the qualitative and quantitative composition given in table 1. With less than 1 mg of budesonide per orodispersible effervescent tablet the instability turns out even more clearly.

(30) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Lacking stability of budesonide 1 mg effervescent tablets with modified composition Storage period at 25° C./60% relative humidity in months Initially 3 6 9 12 18 27 Content of 98.6 99.7 101.1 99.8 98.9 96.8 95.7 Budesonide [%] Sum of total <0.1  0.31  0.66  0.86  0.81  1.05  1.63 impurities [%] Storage period at 30° C./65% relative humidity in months Initially 3 6 9 12 Content of 98.6 100.1 100.4 99.4 98.2 Budesonide [%] Sum of total <0.1  <0.1  0.91  1.01  1.31 impurities [%]

(31) In this test, 0.4 mg of sucralose were replaced by 1.0 mg aspartame.

EXAMPLE 4

(32) Clinical Data:

(33) In a 4-arm, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II multicenter study 2×1 mg/day or 2×2 mg/day of budesonide effervescent tablets were compared with 2×2 mg/day oral viscous budesonide suspension or placebo in the treatment of active eosinophilic esophagitis. Blinding was ensured by using the “Double-Dummy” technique. The aim of the study was to show the superiority of the budesonide formulations over placebo. The first primary partial endpoint of said study was the rate of the histological remission, wherein the eosinophils (eos) of the patients in remission had to attain mean number of <16 eos/mm.sup.2 hpf (“high power field”, i.e. the visual field in the microscope at a magnitude of 400×) after 2 weeks of treatment. As the second primary partial endpoint the difference in the mean number of eos/mm.sup.2 hpf between the beginning of the study and the end of the treatment was measured. Both described efficacy parameters were confirmatively examined in a closed test method to enable a comparison of all three verum groups with the placebo group. The design of the study including the described endpoints is virtually identical to the study described in the publication of Straumann, 2010 loc. cit.

(34) Surprisingly, the results of all three test formulations not only were significantly better than that of the placebo, but also better than that of the budesonide formulation that is described in the work of Straumann et al., 2010 loc. cit., in the dosage of 2×1 mg/day this result is significant.

(35) Table 4 shows the results for the histological remission defined as an average of <16 eos/mm.sup.2 hpf. Patients that prematurely left the study without a histological secondary inspection having taken place were analyzed as patients that are not in remission. In a sensitivity analysis only patients were analyzed who had completed the study.

(36) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Histological Remission Number (%) of patients with histological remission BUU-2/EEA Straumann (2010 loc. cit.) Budesonide Budesonide Budesonide 2 × 1 mg 2 × 2 mg 2 × 1 mg Tablet Tablet Placebo suspension Placebo FAS at wk 12** (LOCF) ITT 19/19 (100%) 18/19 (95%) 0/19 (0%) 13/18 (72%) 2/18 (11%) [95% RCI] [64.7%; 100%] [57.6%; 99.5%] — NA — p-value * <0.0001 <0.0001 — <0.0001 — PP at wk 12** (LOCF) ITT 19/19 (100%) 17/17 (100%) 0/17 (0%) — — [95% RCI] [63.1%; 100%] [61.3%; 100%] — — — p-value * <0.0001 <0.0001 — — — histological Remission defined as <5 eos/hpf (corresponding to <16 eos/mm.sup.2 hpf) FAS, Full Analysis Set; PP, Per Protocol Analysis Set; RCI, repeated confidence interval (for the difference between verum and placebo) * for the superiority of verum over placebo **at wk 12. at 12 weeks

(37) Also for the analysis of the co-primary endpoint the superiority over the placebo could be shown (table 5). (The comparison with Straumann is not possible, since this endpoint was not studied in Straumann).

(38) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Difference in the mean number eos/mm.sup.2 hpf (FAS) Budesonide Budesonide Budesonide 1 mg Tablet 2 mg Tablet 2 mg Susp. Placebo (n = 19) (n = 19) (n = 19) (n = 19) mean −119.919 (79.275) −128.120 (78.457) −96.665 (124.253) −7.882 (157.939) (SD) n n = 19 n = 18 n = 18 n = 19 p-value * 0.0006 0.0005 0.0041 — * for the superiority of verum over placebo

(39) Additionally, it could be shown for all verum groups that in all esophagus segments the load with eosinophils was almost completely eliminated (in a region of 0.2-2.7 eos/mm.sup.2 hpf). This result confirms that the pharmaceutical formulation according to the invention esophagus-selectively distributes the active ingredient over the entire esophagus. This is illustrated in FIG. 1.

(40) FIG. 1 shows the mean load with eosinophils in the respective esophagus segment. The esophagus was divided in proximal part, central part (Mid) and the distal part. It was given the mean number of eosinophils/mm.sup.2 hpf. The abbreviation EOT means “End of Treatment”.

EXAMPLE 5

(41) In addition to the described efficacy on the histology it was shown that a 2-week treatment with the formulation according to the invention also results in a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement of the eosinophilic esophagitis, based on the endoscopic image. This is illustrated in FIG. 2.

(42) In FIG. 2 there is given the mean total endoscopic intensity score. The abbreviation BUET means orodispersible, budesonide-containing effervescent tablet. The abbreviation 2×1 mg means twice-daily dose of one tablet with 1 mg of active ingredient. The abbreviation 2×2 mg means twice-daily dose of an orodispersible effervescent tablet with 2 mg of active ingredient.

(43) Baseline means the baseline, EOT means “End of Treatment”. Here, Baseline means the first visit of the patient on which the treatment starts and EOT is the last visit during the treatment. Since there is always applied the principle of the LOCF (last observation carried forward) the EOT visit can take place at different times, but always with all test parameters according to the protocol of the last visit of the patients.

EXAMPLE 6

(44) The orodispersible effervescent tablets according to the invention with 2 mg of budesonide per tablet in a study were administered to a group of patients between 20 and 50 years of age. The patients were treated in a test group with one 2 mg budesonide tablet per day. The control group got an orodispersible effervescent tablet without active ingredient (placebo). During a 15-days treatment it was found that the orodispersible budesonide-containing effervescent tablet was well tolerated and that the histological and clinical parameters were significantly improved in contrast to the placebo group. The orodispersible effervescent tablet in view of the applicability by all test persons was entirely evaluated as positive.

EXAMPLE 7

(45) In further examinations, serum/biomarkers for monitoring and checking the response to therapy of a medication of the eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) were identified. In the clinical study there were included EoE patients who have received a topical steroid therapy (the orodispersible effervescent tablet according to the patent). Various serum markers were tested for their suitability to what extent the response to therapy and the success of the therapy correlate with the changes of these serum markers. The sample material for the serum samples is derived from the clinical study described in the patent application (Example 4).

(46) The “eosinophilic cationic protein, ECP” proved to be particularly suitable as a marker. This is a cytotoxic protein that is released from the granules of activated eosinophilic granulocytes (Rothenberg, Gastroenterology 2009, 1238-1249). It is known that this protein seems to be suitable for monitoring the response of therapy under topical fluticasone (Schlag et al., J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014, 600-606).

(47) It was surprisingly found that ECP not only reflects the clinical results. In addition to the clear correlation between the histological remission and the decrease in the serum level of ECP during the 2-weeks treatment with 1 and 2 mg, respectively, of orodispersible budesonide effervescent tablets there was also shown a lasting therapy success after completion of the 2-weeks treatment. This is illustrated in FIG. 3 (right illustration on “Follow-up Phase, FU”; duration of FU: 2 weeks).

(48) From the experiments performed an additional effect can be deduced. The formulation according to the invention in addition to the effective treatment is also suitable to achieve an ongoing post-treatment clinical effect. It does not come to the frequently observed “rebound effect” when a drug therapy is completed.

EXAMPLE 8

(49) Specification of the Long-Lasting Clinical Effect

(50) The long-lasting clinical effect can be shown from additionally performed tests by illustrating the dysphagia score in the treatment-free follow-up period. Said instrument, the so-called “patient reported outcome”, demonstrates the frequency of dysphagia events from 0 (no event) to 4 (several events per day) as well as the intensity of these events from 0 (no difficulties in swallowing) to 5 (long-lasting, complete obstruction that requires an endoscopic intervention). The results of the BUU-2 study for this score show that the treatment effect, measured as mean change (in %), lasts between the last treatment and the end of the follow-up period in the verum groups (1 mg and 2 mg of budesonide). In both groups this change is negative, i.e. the score has improved from a higher to a lower value. In the placebo group said value with +25.5% has deteriorated significantly. The results of these tests are summarized in FIG. 4.