HOLED INGOT IMPROVING A LINE PRODUCTIVITY

Abstract

An ingot, having a volume between 0.15 m.sup.3 and 0.80 m.sup.3 and a surface area to volume ratio between 10 m.sup.−1 and 18 m.sup.−1, made of at least one metal, having longitudinal faces extending between two end faces and including at least one hole extending from one of the longitudinal faces, the maximum distance between any point of the hole periphery, to its closest longitudinal face, noted MaxL, the at least one hole being configured such that said maximum distance MaxL is smaller than the minimal distance, noted MinE, between any point of the hole periphery and its closest end face.

Claims

1-10. (canceled)

11. An ingot having a volume between 0.15 m.sup.3 and 0.80 m.sup.3 and a surface area to volume ratio between 10 m.sup.−1 and 18 m.sup.−1, made of at least one metal, and comprising: two end faces; longitudinal faces extending between the two end faces, the longitudinal faces including a first and a second longitudinal face; and at least one hole extending from the first longitudinal faces to the second longitudinal face, the hole having a hole periphery, a maximum distance between any point of the hole periphery, to a closest of the longitudinal faces being defined as MaxL, the at least one hole being configured such that MaxL is smaller than a minimal distance, defined as MinE, between any point of the hole periphery and a closest of the two end faces.

12. The ingot as recited in claim 11 wherein the ingot is a parallelepiped.

13. The ingot as recited in claim 11 wherein the first longitudinal face is opposite the second longitudinal face.

14. The ingot as recited in claim 11 wherein the at least one hole has a cylindrical or conical shape.

15. The ingot as recited in claim 11 wherein the at least one hole includes two holes defining two maximum distances, MaxL′ and MaxL″, and two hole peripheries, any point of a hole periphery being spaced from any point of another hole periphery by a distance, defined as Sp, that is bigger at least than max(MaxL′, MaxL″).

16. The ingot as recited in claim 11 wherein the at least one hole includes three holes defining three maximum distances, MaxL′, MaxL″ and MaxL′″, and three hole peripheries, any point of a hole periphery being spaced from any point of another hole periphery by a distance that is at least bigger than max(MaxL′, MaxL″, MaxL′″).

17. The ingot as recited in claim 11 wherein the volume is between 0.15 m.sup.3 and 0.40 m.sup.3.

18. The ingot as recited in claim 11 wherein the surface area to volume ratio is between 12 m.sup.−1 and 18 m.sup.−1.

19. A method for managing a bath level of a molten alloy and reducing the dross formation inside a tank wherein the ingot as recited in claim 11 is fully immersed into said bath.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017] To illustrate the invention, various embodiments and trials of non-limiting examples will be described, particularly with reference to the following figures:

[0018] FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a classical coating installation.

[0019] FIG. 2 exhibits several modelled ingot shapes during an ingot feeding process in determined industrial process condition for an embodiment of a classical ingot at determined melting times.

[0020] FIG. 3 is a schematic view of an embodiment of the present invention.

[0021] FIG. 4A exhibits a front view (A) and FIG. 4B a top view (B) of an embodiment of the present invention.

[0022] FIG. 5 exhibits several modelled ingot shapes during an ingot feeding process in determined industrial process condition for an embodiment of the present invention at determined melting times.

[0023] FIG. 6 is a schematic view of an embodiment of a parallelepipedal ingot as understood in the present invention.

[0024] FIG. 7 is a schematic view of an embodiment of the present invention with two holes.

[0025] FIG. 8 is a schematic top view of an embodiment of the present invention with two holes.

[0026] FIG. 9 is a schematic of an embodiment of the present invention with three holes.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0027] As illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4A and 4B, the invention relates to an ingot 10, having a volume between 0.15 m.sup.3 and 0.80 m.sup.3 and a surface area to volume ratio between 10 m.sup.−1 and 18 m.sup.−1, made of at least one metal, having longitudinal faces 13 extending between two end faces (14a, 14b) and comprising at least one hole 11 extending from one of said longitudinal faces 13 to a second longitudinal face, the maximum distance between any point of the hole periphery 110, to the closest longitudinal face (13), being noted MaxL, said at least one hole being configured such that said maximum distance MaxL is smaller than the minimal distance, being noted MinE, between any point of the hole periphery and the closest end face (14a, 14b). The ingot is defined by a length which is bigger than the height and the width of said ingot. In the case where the ingot cannot be clearly defined by a length, a width and a height, for example an egg or pyramidal form, the projection of such ingot on a surface can be used to define a width and a height and the length can be defined as the maximum distance between two points of the ingot.

[0028] Said ingot has a volume between 0.15 m.sup.3 and 0.80 m.sup.3. On one hand, if the ingot volume exceeds 0.80 m.sup.3, the ingot might be difficult to transport, stock, handle and/or used by the supplying mean of the coating line. On the other hand, if the ingot volume is lower than 0.15 m.sup.3, the productivity might be negatively impacted because the time taken to handle and place the ingot on the supplying mean will be too high compared to the ingot melting time.

[0029] Said ingot has a surface area to volume ratio between 10 m.sup.−1 and 18 m.sup.−1. On one side, if this ratio is lower than 10 m.sup.−1, it lowers the melting rate of the ingot due to a low exchange surface between the ingot and the molten metal bath which negatively impacts the line productivity and the bath management due to the risk of ingot pile formation at the tank bottom. On the other side, if this ratio exceeds 18 m.sup.−1, considering the claimed ingot, it would apparently weaken the choc resistance of the ingot and thus increase the ingot breakage risk.

[0030] Driven by the idea of reducing the ingot melting time and the ingot pile formation, an ingot comprising a hole as previously described is particularly interesting for two main reasons. Firstly, such a hole permits to fragment the ingot into several pieces during its supply. As illustrated in FIG. 5, said fragmentation is done in the plans (12a and 12b) comprising holes (11a and 11b) and perpendicular to the ingot length of said ingot. In FIG. 5, said fragmentation is modelled for the same condition as in the FIG. 1. The time noted, from 0 to 25 min, is the time during which the ingot is completely immersed. Thanks to this fragmentation, the surface exchange between the molten metal bath and the ingots is increased and so is the ingot melting rate. Secondly, said claimed ingot is easy to cast, even from an existing mould. For example, a part can be added inside the mould to have the desired hole.

[0031] Consequently, the melting speed of the ingot is hence increased which reduces the formation of ingots pile at the bottom of said tank permitting to increase a line productivity and the coating quality and to reduce the dross formation.

[0032] The hole can have the form of a cone, a cylinder, a cylinder of revolution, a portion of a sphere. Said holes are solely used for increasing the ingot melting speed. Said holes are not used for handling nor for inserting the ingot into the bath.

[0033] The claimed ingot is made of at least one metal. Preferably, the ingot is at least made of zinc and/or silicon and/or magnesium and/or aluminium.

[0034] Preferably, said ingot 10 is a parallelepiped. The ingot is described as parallelepipedal, but, as represented in FIG. 6, the term “parallelepipedal” includes crenellations 16, attachment means 17, any rim or edges 18 and/or any common ingot geometry. Such crenellations are mainly used for handling purpose, e.g.: for elevating the ingot. Moreover, the ingot shape, a parallelepiped is commonly used and would thus need only minor or no change to the supplying system to be industrially implemented and used. Furthermore, because it does not contain any protuberance nor fragile edges or sections, which might break during the ingot handling and/or addition, the claimed ingot is choc resistant and thus industrially suitable.

[0035] Preferably, as illustrated in FIG. 3, said at least one hole (11) extends from a first longitudinal face of said ingot to a second longitudinal face of said ingot being the opposite face of said first longitudinal face.

[0036] Preferably, said at least one hole 11 has a cylindrical or conical shape. When the conical shaped hole does not extend from one face to another face, it is preferentially oriented such that the cone base is on the along the ingot surface. It permits to ease the unmoulding of the ingots having a cylindrical or a conical shaped hole because their circumference does not increase along the hole depth.

[0037] Preferably, said at least one hole is characterised by a height h, wherein said height h is perpendicular to the ingot length. Having such a hole eases the ingot fragmentation because the surface in the fragmentation plan is smaller thanks to the hole orientation compared to an ingot having a hole with the same geometry (shape and diameter) but with a height not perpendicular to said ingot length. Preferably, all the holes are characterised by a height, wherein said height is perpendicular to said ingot length.

[0038] Preferably, said ingot comprises n holes, defining n maximum distance (MaxD1, . . . , MaxDn) and n holes peripheries any point of a hole periphery being spaced from any point of another hole periphery by a distance, noted Sp, that is at least bigger than max(MaxD1, . . . , MaxDn). Spacing the holes by such a distance permits to fragment the ingot into (n+1) parts during the ingot melting and thus increases the melting speed and reduces the formation of an ingot pile.

[0039] Preferably, as illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8 said ingot comprises two holes (11′, 11″) defining two maximum distances, MaxL′ and MaxL″, and two holes peripheries (110′, 110″), any point of a hole periphery (110′) being spaced from any point of another hole periphery (110″) by a distance, noted Sp, that is at least bigger than max(MaxL′, MaxL″). Spacing the holes by such a distance permits to fragment the ingot into three parts during the ingot melting and thus increases the melting speed and reduces the formation of an ingot pile.

[0040] Preferably, as shown in FIG. 9, said ingot comprises three holes, defining three maximum distances, MaxL′, MaxL″ and MaxL′″, and three holes peripheries, any point of a hole periphery being spaced from any point of another hole periphery by a distance that is at least bigger than max(MaxL′, MaxL″, MaxL′″). Spacing the holes by such a distance permits to fragment the ingot into four parts during the ingot melting and thus increases the melting speed and reduces the formation of an ingot pile.

[0041] Preferably, said ingot has a volume between 0.15 m.sup.3 and 0.40 m.sup.3.

[0042] Preferably, said ingot has a surface area to volume ratio between 12 m.sup.−1 and 18 m.sup.−1. Such a ratio range increases even further the productivity because the lower threshold is increased compared to the previous mentioned range.

[0043] The invention also refers to a process for managing a bath level of a molten alloy and reducing the dross formation inside a tank wherein an ingot, according to anyone of claims 1 to 10, is fully immersed into said bath.