POLYMERIC ANION-CONDUCTING MEMBRANE

20220243012 · 2022-08-04

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    The present invention provides compounds, especially polymeric compounds, having preferably at least one spiro or piperidine structural unit, a process for preparation thereof and the use thereof as anion conducting membrane.

    Claims

    1. Compound containing at least one unit of the formula (I) ##STR00008## with X being a structure element comprising a nitrogen atom with a positive charge bonded to C.sup.1 and C.sup.2 and bonded via two bonds to one or two hydrocarbon radical(s) comprising 1 to 12, preferably 1 to 6, more preferably 1 or 5 carbon atoms and Z being a structure element comprising a carbon atom being bonded to C.sup.3 and C.sup.4 and at least one aromatic 6-ring directly bonded to one of the oxygen atoms, wherein the aromatic rings might be substituted with one or more halogen and/or one or more C.sub.1- to C.sub.4-alkyl radicals.

    2. Compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the compound is represented by formula (Ia) or (Ib) ##STR00009## with Y=same or different halogen, preferably F, M being an integer from 1 to 500, preferably 5 to 250, X being a structure element comprising a nitrogen atom with a positive charge bonded to C.sup.1 and C.sup.2 and bonded via two bonds to one or two hydrocarbon radical(s) comprising 1 to 12, preferably 1 to 6, more preferably 1 or 5 carbon atoms and Z being a structure element comprising a carbon atom being bonded to C.sup.3 and C.sup.4 and at least one aromatic 6-ring directly bonded to one of the oxygen atoms, wherein the aromatic rings might be substituted with one or more halogen and/or one or more C.sub.1- to C.sub.4-alkyl radicals.

    3. Compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the structure element X represents a unit of formula (IIa) or (IIb) ##STR00010##

    4. Compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the structure element X present represents in more than 50%, preferably in more than 75%, and most preferred in more than 90% of its occurrence a unit of formula (IIa) or (IIb).

    5. Compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the structure element Z represents a unit of formula (IIIa) ##STR00011## with R.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3, and R.sub.4, being the same or different —H or an alkyl group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, R.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3, and R.sub.4 each preferably being a methyl or tert-butyl group, more preferably being a methyl group.

    6. Compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the compound is represented by at least one of formulas (IVa) to (IVd), ##STR00012## with M.sup.a and M.sup.b being an integer of from 1 to 500, preferably of from 5 to 250, and wherein the aromatic rings might further be substituted with one or more halogen and/or one or more C.sub.1- to C.sub.4-alkyl radicals.

    7. Compound according to claim 1, characterized in that the aromatic rings in the compounds of formula (I), (Ia), (Ib), (IVa), (IVb), (IVc), and (IVd) are not further substituted with one or more halogen or one or more C.sub.1- to C.sub.4-alkyl radicals.

    8. Process for preparing compounds according to claim 1, characterized in that it comprises a step in which a compound of the formula (V) ##STR00013## is reacted with one compound selected from formulas (VIa) to (VIb) ##STR00014## wherein the aromatic rings might further be substituted with one or more halogen and/or one or more C.sub.1- to C.sub.4-alkyl radicals.

    9. Process according to claim 8, characterized in that it comprises a step where an alkylating reagent, preferably a methylating reagent, is used.

    10. Process according to claim 8, characterized in that the aromatic rings in the compounds of formula (V), (VIa), and (VIb) are not further substituted with one or more halogen or one or more C.sub.1- to C.sub.4-alkyl radicals.

    11. (canceled)

    12. (canceled)

    13. Electrolyzer, characterized in that it includes a compound according to claim 1.

    14. An anion conducting membrane comprising a compound according to claim 1.

    15. A method for performing an electrochemical process, preferably selected from electrolysis, electrodialysis and fuel cell technology, wherein an anion conducting membrane according to claim 14 is employed.

    Description

    EXAMPLES

    Example 1: Synthesis of Piperidine Containing Monomer (VIb)

    [0031] One 500 ml three-necked flask with internal thermometer, heating with magnetic stirrer and reflux cooler was fed with 150 g of acetic acid, 17 g (0.15 mol) of N-Methylpiperidone, 49 g (0.40 mol) of 2,6-Dimethylphenol and 30 g of concentrated hydrochloric acid. Subsequently, this solution was heated under stirring to 90° C. Over the reaction time a significant part of the product precipitated. After 40 hours, the reaction mass was cooled to room temperature. The crystallized precipitate was filtered off, washed three times with a small amount of acetic acid and suspended in a mixture of 250 g of water with 400 g of ethanol. Subsequently, the suspension was heated to 80° C. leading to dissolution of suspended solid. By adding ammonia solution N-Methyl-4,4-Bis (3′,5′-Dimethyl, 4′-Hydroxyphenyl)-Piperidine monomer was precipitated. After cooling to room temperature this was filtered off, the filter cake was 3 times washed with water and dried overnight in vacuum.

    Example 2: Synthesis of Piperidine Containing Polymer

    [0032] Synthesis was performed in a 500 mL three-necked flask with oil bath, mechanical stirrer, a packed column with distillation head cooler with adjustable return ratio and condensate removal. At the beginning of synthesis 0.09 mol (30.51 g) of N-Methyl-4,4-Bis (3′,5′-Dimethyl, 4′-Hydroxyphenyl)-Piperidine, 0.09 mol (19.62 g) of 4,4′-Difluorobenzophenone, 105 g of dimethylacetamide and 0.135 mol of finely ground K.sub.2CO.sub.3 were mixed under nitrogen atmosphere over 1 hour at room temperature. Afterwards the temperature of the oil bath was increased to 235° C. leading to boiling of the reaction mixture. Generated water was removed using the column and 55 g of dimethylacetamide were added to the reaction mixture. After 4 hours additional 50 g dimethylacetamide were added to the reaction mixture and the temperature of the oil bath was decreased to 190° C. After 10 hours the heating of the oil bath was turned off and the reaction product was cooled down to room temperature and poured into water. The product was washed with hot water two times and one time with an ethanol:water=1:1 mixture (by volume). Finely, it was dried under vacuum at 125° C. overnight. The yield was almost stoichiometric at 45 g.

    Example 3: Quaternization of Piperidine Containing Polymer from Example 2

    [0033] 10 g of the polymer from Example 2 were dissolved in 45 g of dimethylacetamide under stirring at 50° C. for 1 hour. After cooling of the polymer solution down to 30° C. 4.13 g of iodomethane were slowly added dropwise to the polymer solution and it was stirred for additional 2 hours. Excess of iodomethane was removed after quaternization of the polymer by use of a vacuum pump at 200 mbar and the gas phase was passed through two serially arranged gas washing bottles filled with an aqueous 30 wt.-% solution of KOH.

    Example 4: Membrane Casting of Piperidine Containing Polymer from Example 3

    [0034] The solution of the quaternized polymer from Example 3 was directly used for preparation of the membrane. The required amount of polymer solution was taken up with a syringe and applied directly through a 0.45 μm PTFE filter on a glass plate preheated to 40° C. For the coating of the glass plate, an applicator with doctor blade was automatically pulled over the glass plate at a speed of 5 mm/s. The applied wet layer was pre-dried for 12 hours under nitrogen atmosphere at room temperature and then dried for 6 hours at 60° C. under vacuum.

    Example 5: Synthesis of Spiro Containing Monomer (VIa)

    [0035] In a 2 L three-necked flask with magnetic stirrer, temperature control and condenser 36 g (0.26 mol) of K.sub.2CO.sub.3 were dissolved in 150 ml of EtOH. Then 57.3 g (0.40 mol) of 1,4-Dioxa-8-azaspiro[4,5]decane were dissolved in 800 ml of EtOH and transferred in three-necked flask. After that temperature was regulated to 35° C. Subsequently, a solution of 92 g (0.40 mol) of 1,5-Dibrompentane in 150 ml of EtOH was added dropwise over 12 hours. After 70 hours reaction products were cooled to room temperature, precipitated KBr was separated by filtration and the solution was concentrated on a rotary evaporator. During concentration process additional amount of KBr crystallizes and was filtered off. The filtrate solidified at temperature below 80° C., was filtered and used without further purification as one of educts for synthesis of spiro containing monomer (VIa).

    [0036] In a 500 ml round bottom flask with magnetic stirrer and oil bath 51.5 g (0.177 mol) of the molecule described above and 0.44 mol of 2,6-Dimethylphenol and 20 g (0.21 mol) of methanesulfonic acid, 1 g of water and 0.90 g (0.005 mol) of Sodium 3-mercapto-1-propanesulfonate were stirred for 70 hours at 100° C. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and mixed three times with 200 g of water. After that it was distilled at 10 mbar pressure to remove volatile substances. Spiro containing monomer (VIa) partially solidified and was two times recrystallized in 25 vol % mixture of EtOH in water.

    Example 6: Synthesis of Spiro Containing Polymer

    [0037] Synthesis was performed in a 100 mL three-necked flask with oil bath, mechanical stirrer, a packed column with distillation head cooler with adjustable return ratio and condensate removal. At the beginning of synthesis 0.01 mol (4.89 g) of 3,3-bis(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-6-azaspiro [5.5]undecane-6-ium methane sulfonate, 0.01 mol (2.18 g) of 4,4′-Difluorobenzophenone, 15 g of dimethylacetamide and 0.0125 mol (1.73 g) of finely ground K.sub.2CO.sub.3 were mixed under nitrogen atmosphere over 1 hour at room temperature. After that, the temperature of the oil bath was increased to 235° C. leading to boiling of the reaction mixture. Generated water was removed using the column and 8 g of dimethylacetamide were added to the reaction mixture. After 10 hours heating the oil bath was turned off and reaction product was cooled down to room temperature and poured in ethyl acetate. The product was washed with hot water three times and one time with an ethanol:water=1:1 (by volume) mixture. Finely, it was dried under vacuum at 110° C. overnight.

    Example 7: Membrane Casting of Spiro Containing Polymer from Example 6

    [0038] 10 g of polymer from Example 6 were dissolved in 30 g of dimethylacetamide under stirring at 50° C. for 1 hour. The required amount of polymer solution was taken up with a syringe and applied directly through a 0.45 μm PTFE filter on a glass plate preheated to 40° C. For the coating of the glass plate, an applicator with doctor blade was automatically pulled over the glass plate at a speed of 5 mm/s. The applied wet layer was pre-dried for 12 hours under nitrogen at room temperature and then dried for 6 hours at 60° C. under vacuum.

    Example 8: Synthesis of Spiro Containing Block-co-Polymer

    [0039] Step 1: In a 100 ml three-necked flask with magnetic stirrer, heating and reflux condenser, 0.02 mol (6.72 g) 4,4′-(Hexafluoroisopropylidene)diphenol, 0.018 mol (3.924 g) 4,4′-Difluorobenzophenone were dissolved in 24 g dimethylformamide. After adding 0.0225 mol (3.1 g) milled K.sub.2CO.sub.3, all educts were refluxed for 4 hours and then cooled to room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere.

    [0040] Step 2: In a 250 ml three-necked flask with mechanical stirrer, heating, column with distillate removal head 0.02 mol (9.78 g) of spiro containing monomer (VIa) from Example 5, 0.022 mol (4.796 g) 4,4′-Difluorobenzophenone, 0.0225 mol (3.1 g) milled K.sub.2CO.sub.3 were mixed in 35 g dimethylformamide and slowly heated to boiling. As a result, a sparingly soluble precipitate was formed and was resolved completely in the course of reaction. Water formed during the reaction was removed at the column head. Mixture of educts was refluxed for 15 hours and then cooled to room temperature under nitrogen.

    [0041] Step 3: The reaction mass of Step 1 was slowly added into the reaction mass of Step 2 and 25 g dimethylformamide were added to this mixture. The apparatus was purged with nitrogen and boiled for 6 hours at reflux and while stirring. The solution was cooled to room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere.

    Example 9: Membrane Casting of Spiro Containing Block-co-Polymer from Example 8

    [0042] 10 g of polymer from Example 8 were dissolved in 30 g of dimethylacetamide under stirring at 50° C. for 1 hour. The required amount of polymer solution was taken up with a syringe and applied directly through a 0.45 μm PTFE filter on a glass plate preheated to 40° C. For the coating of the glass plate, an applicator with doctor blade was automatically pulled over the glass plate at a speed of 5 mm/s.

    [0043] The applied wet layer was pre-dried for 12 hours under nitrogen at room temperature and then dried for 6 hours at 60° C. under vacuum.

    Example 10: Ion Exchange of Membranes

    [0044] The membranes prepared in Examples 4, 7, and 9 respectively were ion-exchanged: Samples of the membranes were placed in aqueous 1 M KOH solution for 24 hours at 60° C. Afterwards the membrane samples were rinsed off with deionized water and placed in fresh portions of the deionized water 3 times for 1 hour each at 60° C. Subsequently, the membrane samples were stored in a fresh portion of the deionized water overnight at room temperature.

    Example 11: Measurement of Ionic Conductivity (IC)

    [0045] The in-plane ionic conductivity of ion-exchanged membrane samples from Example 10 were measured by means of impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in a conventional 4-electrode arrangement. The membrane sample was mounted in a commercial BT-112 cell (Bekk Tech LLC), so that the two outer Pt wires were placed under the sample and the two midpoint Pt wires above the sample. The BT-112 cell was mounted between 2 PTFE plates and filled with deionized water. The temperature of the deionized water was controlled by a water bath and deionized water was pumped permanently through the cell. The calculation of the membrane resistance (R.sub.membrane) was carried out by fitting acquired EIS spectrum using a widely used R (RC) Randles equivalent circuit. The ionic conductivity (a) of the membrane sample is given by equation (1):


    σ=L/(R.sub.membran*A)   (1)

    where L is the distance between Pt wires (5 mm) and A is the area of the membrane sample between the two outer Pt wires. Each measurement was repeated for 3 samples per membrane and a mean±standard deviation was calculated.

    [0046] Two commercially available ion exchange membranes were tested in the same way. The results of the measurements are given in Table 1.

    Example 12: Measurement of Water Uptake (VW)

    [0047] Ion-exchanged membrane samples from Example 10 (3 samples per membrane tested) were used for measurement of water uptake. All samples were dried for 24 hours in a vacuum oven at 40° C. and 25 mbar, then cooled in a desiccator to room temperature and weighted. For the measurement of the water uptake, membrane samples were stored for 24 hours in deionized water at 25° C. Subsequently, the weight of each sample was determined again. For this purpose, adhering water was removed from the membrane with the aid of a filter paper. Each measurement was repeated 3 times and a mean±standard deviation was calculated. The water uptake (WU) results from equation (2):


    WU=(m.sub.wet−m.sub.dy)/m.sub.y*100%   (2)

    with m.sub.wet the mass of the sample after swelling and m.sub.dry the mass of the sample after drying.

    [0048] Two commercially available ion exchange membranes were tested in the same way. The results of the measurements are given in Table 1.

    Example 13: Measurement of Dimensional Stability (DS)

    [0049] Ion-exchanged membrane samples from Example 10 (3 samples per membrane tested) were used for the measurement of dimensional stability. All samples were dried for 24 hours in a vacuum oven at 40° C. and 25 mbar, then cooled in a desiccator to room temperature. Such parameters as the sample length, the sample width and the sample thickness were determined. To determine the swelling behavior, membrane samples were stored for 24 hours in deionized water at 25° C. Subsequently, the sample length, the sample width and the sample thickness were determined again. For this purpose, adhering water was removed from the membrane with the aid of a filter paper. Each measurement was repeated 3 times and a mean±standard deviation was calculated. The swelling behavior (referred to as dimensional stability, DS) in length, width and thickness is given by Equation (3):


    DS=(x.sub.wet−x.sub.dry)/x.sub.dry*100%   (3)

    with x.sub.wet the length, width or thickness of the sample after swelling and x.sub.dry the dry length, dry width or dry thickness of the sample.

    [0050] Two commercially available ion exchange membranes were tested in the same way. The results of the measurements are given in Table 1.

    Example 14: Measurement of Mechanical Strength in Deionized Water at Different Temperatures (DMA)

    [0051] Ion-exchanged membrane samples from Example 10 (3 samples per membrane tested) were stored for 24 in deionized water at 25° C. Before the sample was installed in the measuring system (DMA 8000 with water bath), the width and thickness of each membrane sample were determined. Each measurement was repeated 3 times and a mean±standard deviation was calculated. DMA measurement was performed as follows:—membrane sample is installed between two perpendicular braces with a static preload. In order to apply a static preload to the sample, the distance between the clamps (also referred to as free path length I) is reduced by about 1 mm during installation. The specimen is fixed between the two staples and then the original free path length is restored, stretching the specimen. The entire test setup is immersed in deionized water in a heated water bath so that the sample is completely surrounded by water. The measuring procedure involves the examination of the sample in a temperature range between room temperature (25° C.) and 90° C. at an applied heating rate of 2 K/min. Within this temperature interval, membrane sample is continuously loaded sinusoidally with an elongation c of 0.1% at a frequency of 1 Hz. The elongation in % results from equation (4):


    ε=Δl/l   (4)

    with Δl of the sample strain in mm and l of the free path. With a free path length of l=10 mm, an elongation of 0.01 mm results for ε=0.1%. Via a force sensor, the voltage required for the given strain is detected.

    [0052] Two commercially available ion exchange membranes were tested in the same way. The results of the measurement are given in Table 1.

    TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Experimental data obtained according to Examples 9 to 12 with membranes from Example 4 labeled as Membrane 1, from Example 7 labeled as Membrane 2, from Example 9 labeled as Membrane 3 (all three membranes were ion exchanged in OH-form as described in Example 10) and commercially available membranes. WU DS.sup.1 IC.sup.2 IC.sup.3 DMA.sup.4 [%] [%] [mS/cm] [mS/cm] [GPa] Membrane 1 10.4 ± 1.6 4.6 ± 0.4 84.1 ± 1.9 — 0.661 ± 0.11 Membrane 2  6.5 ± 1.9 3.9 ± 0.3 46.1 ± 1.6 —  0.446 ± 0.038 Membrane 3  6.9 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.1 11.2 ± 1.2 —  0.946 ± 0.092 FAA-3 28.4 ± 8.8 13.1 ± 2.7  30.9 ± 3.4 — 0.086 ± 0.01 Nafion N-115 14.0 ± 0.7 5.1 ± 0.5 — 110.7 ± 4.8 0.085 ± 0.01 FAA-3 is a commercially available anion exchange membrane from FUMATECH BWT GmbH Nafion N-115 is a commercially available cation exchange membrane from The Chemours Company .sup.1These data refer to the change in the thickness of the membrane .sup.2These data refer to the conductivity of the membrane measured in OH.sup.− form .sup.3These data refer to the conductivity of the membrane measured in H.sup.+ form .sup.4All membranes were measured in OH form @ 60° C. (Nafion was measured in H.sup.+ form)

    [0053] It can be seen from Table 1, that the membranes according to the invention show a DMA value that is at least 5 times higher than the DMA value of the prior art membranes. It is therefore possible to produce thinner membranes with equal mechanical stability.