ESTER SYNTHESIS USING HETEROGENEOUS AU/TIO2 CATALYST

Abstract

A process for direct esterification of an alkyl aldehyde with an alkyl alcohol to produce an alkyl ester is disclosed. The process comprises reacting an alkyl aldehyde with an alkyl alcohol in the presence of an Au/TiOa catalyst, a base and an enal or oxygen to form an ester and an aldehyde. The process avoids liberation of water and avoids the step of oxidation of the alkyl aldehyde to an alkyl acid.

Claims

1. A process for preparing esters comprising: a) combining an alkyl aldehyde with an alkyl alcohol to form a first mixture; b) heating said first mixture in the presence of an Au/TiO.sub.2 catalyst in the presence of a base and oxygen to form a second mixture comprising an ester and an alkyl aldehyde; c) recovering said ester and said alkyl aldehyde from said second mixture.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein said alkyl alcohol is methanol.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein said alkyl aldehyde is 2-ethylhexaldehyde.

4. A process for preparing esters comprising: a) combining an alkyl aldehyde with an alkyl enal to form a first mixture; b) heating said mixture in the presence of an Au/TiO.sub.2 catalyst and in the presence of a base to form a second mixture comprising an alkyl ester and an aldehyde; and c) recovering said alkyl ester and said aldehyde from said second mixture.

5. The process of claim 4 wherein said alkyl aldehyde is 2-ethylhexaldehyde.

6. The process of claim 4 wherein said alkyl enal is 2-ethylhexyl enal.

7. A process for preparing 2-ethylhexyl methyl ester comprising: a) combining 2-ethylhexaldehyde with 2-ethylhexenal to form a first mixture; b) heating said first mixture in the presence of a Au/TiO.sub.2 catalyst in the presence of a base and oxygen to form a second mixture comprising methyl-2-ethylhexanoate and 2-ethylhexaldehyde; and c) recovering said methyl-2-ethylhexanoate and said 2-ethylhexaldehyde from said second mixture.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0019] As used herein the following terms have the meaning as described below:

[0020] The term “M2EH” refers to methyl-2-ethylhexanoate.

[0021] The term “TEG” refers to triethylene glycol.

[0022] The term “TEG-2EH” refers to triethylene glycol 2-ethylhexanoate.

[0023] The term “2-HEH” refers to 2-ethylhexaldehyde.

[0024] The term “MeOH” refers to methanol.

[0025] The term “2EH” refers to 2-ethylhexyl alcohol.

[0026] The term “2HEHenal” refers to 2-ethylhexyl enal.

[0027] As used herein, the indefinite articles “a” and “an” mean one or more, unless the context clearly suggests otherwise. Similarly, the singular form of nouns includes their plural form, and vice versa, unless the context clearly suggests otherwise.

[0028] While attempts have been made to be precise, the numerical values and ranges described herein should be considered to be approximations (even when not qualified by the term “about”). These values and ranges may vary from their stated numbers depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention as well as the variations resulting from the standard deviation found in the measuring techniques. Moreover, the ranges described herein are intended and specifically contemplated to include all sub-ranges and values within the stated ranges. For example, a range of 0 to 100 is intended to describe and include all values within the range including sub-ranges such as 0.1-99.9, 60 to 90 and 70 to 80.

[0029] It has been surprisingly discovered that a method to directly esterify an alkyl aldehyde such as 2-ethylhexyl aldehyde with an alkyl alcohol such as methanol avoids liberation of water and avoids the step of oxidation of the alkyl aldehyde such as 2-ethylhexyl aldehyde to an alkyl acid such as 2-ethylhexyl acid.

[0030] This invention utilizes a heterogenous Au/TiO.sub.2 catalyst, available commercially from Strem Chemicals, Inc. The presence of low amounts of a base such as NaOH are required for the reaction to proceed. Other suitable bases include alkali/alkaline earth bases such as LiOH, KOH, Ca(OH).sub.2, and Mg(OH).sub.2, and alkali/alkaline earth methoxides such as sodium methoxide, and potassium methoxide.

[0031] The presence of an oxidant was required to accept the H.sub.2 formed during the reaction. Oxidants include O.sub.2 and an unsaturated species such as an enal.

[0032] In one embodiment 2-ethylhexyl enal can be utilized as the H.sub.2 acceptor, subsequently forming another 2-ethylhexaldehyde molecule that was compatible with the process.

##STR00001##

EXAMPLES

[0033] The present invention includes and expressly contemplates any and all combinations of embodiments, features, characteristics, parameters, and/or ranges disclosed herein. That is, the invention may be defined by any combination of embodiments, features, characteristics, parameters, and/or ranges mentioned herein.

[0034] This invention can be further illustrated by the following examples of preferred embodiments thereof, although it will be understood that these examples are included merely for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention unless otherwise specifically indicated.

Example 1: O.SUB.2 .as Oxidant for the Reaction

[0035] 80 g 2-ethylhexaldehyde, 50 g methanol, 3 g of 1 wt % Au/TiO.sub.2 (ground), 1 g of 50 wt % NaOH in water were placed in a 300 mL nominal Hastelloy autoclave. The reaction temperature was maintained at less than 40° C. Back-pressure was maintained at 100 psig while flowing 8 vol % O.sub.2 balance N.sub.2 at 2,000 sccm while stirring at 1500 RPM.

[0036] The presence of the O.sub.2 (diatomic oxygen from a mixture of 8% O.sub.2 in N.sub.2 oxidizes the aldehyde to the acid in the solution phase. However, for the side reaction that generated the 2EH-methylester it acts as the oxidant to accept the liberated H.sub.2 and formed H.sub.2O resulted in a significant amount of the 2-ethylhexaldehyde reacting to form 2-ethyl hexyl acid, with approximately 5% of the 2-ethylhexaldehyde forming the desired methyl-2-ethylhexanoate product. Table 1 shows the level of methyl-2-ethylhexanoate formed as determined by Gas Chromatography (GC) as a function of reaction time. This series of reactions shows what combination of catalysts were needed to form the desired methyl ester product. It specifically shows that both the heterogeneous Au/TiO.sub.2 catalyst and solution phase base (sodium hydroxide or sodium methoxide) were needed to catalyze the formation of methylester. GC using elution times was used to determine the known species. Subsequent confirmation of speciation was confirmed by GS/Mass Spectroscopy,

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Methyl-2-ethylhexanoate % as function of catalyst combination and time 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min Au/TiO2 0.23 0.32 0.30 Au/TiO2 + 4.03 5.26 5.52 5.61 NaOH NaOH 0 0 0 Au/TiO2 + 2.10 3.26 3.03 3.25 NaOMe

Example 2: 2-ethylhexyl enal as oxidant for the reaction

[0037] 10 g 2-ethylhexaldehyde, 10 g 2-ethylhexyl enal, 50 g methanol, 3 g of 1 wt % Au/TiO.sub.2 (ground), 0.65 g of 50 wt % NaOH in water where added to a 150 mL titanium autoclave. The reaction temperature was maintained at 150° C. and the reactor was purged with N.sub.2, then self-pressurized to about 210 psig while stirring.

[0038] Half of the starting 2-ethylhexaldehyde reacted to form the desired methyl-2-ethylhexanoate. Some of the 2-ethylhexaldehyde was hydrogenated to 2-ethylhexyl alcohol. The GC results are shown in Table 2 using elution times for the known species. Subsequent confirmation of speciation was confirmed by GC/MS.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Species % as a function of time 0 min 25 min 80 min 150 min 240 min 2HEHenal 21.07 17.17 12.83 9.03 5.33 2-HEH 22.75 22.52 22.91 23.57 23.57 M2EH 2.43 4.79 7.45 10.18 13.17 2EH 2.05 2.88 3.54 4.28 5.19

[0039] This example shows the ability of the 2-ethylhexyl enal to act as the oxidant (H.sub.2 acceptor) to drive the reaction forward. With the milder oxidant the aldehyde is not oxidized to the carboxylic acid and the enal that accepts the H.sub.2 becomes an aldehyde species that can react further to the methyl ester, making the reaction a net neutral in aldehyde. This process has high atom efficiency by using the H.sub.2 liberated by the methyl ester formation to hydrogenate the enal, which would normally have to be hydrogenated under high pressure H.sub.2. And in the case of using O.sub.2 as the oxidant, the H.sub.2 liberated is lost as water. The Table 2 also shows that the reaction is not 100% selective for the enal accepting H.sub.2, the aldehyde can accept the H.sub.2 to form 2-ethylhexyl alcohol.

Example 2A: Determination if 2-Ethylhexaldehyde is Needed for Reaction

[0040] 20 g 2-ethylhexyl enal, 50 g methanol, 3 g of 1 wt % Au/TiO.sub.2 (ground), 0.65 g of 50 wt % NaOH in water where added to a 150 mL titanium autoclave. The reaction temperature was maintained at 150° C. and the reactor was purged with N.sub.2, then self-pressurized to about 210 psig while stirring.

[0041] Initially no 2-ethylhexaldehyde was added and the reaction was operated for 60 min, cooled and then 10 g of 2-ethylhexaldehyde was added to the reactor, vented with N.sub.2 and reheated to 150° C. to resume the reaction. While prior to introduction of 2-ethylhexaldehyde there was only trivial formation of methyl-2-ethylhexanoate, after introduction of the 2-ethylhexaldehyde the formation rate of methyl-2-ethylhexanoate was much higher, with a corresponding consumption of 2-ethylhexyl enal. Some of the 2-ethylhexaldehyde was hydrogenated to 2-ethylhexyl alcohol. The results are shown in Table 2A showing GC using elution times for the known species.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2A 30 55 120 160 205 280 345 425 0 min min min min min min min min 2-HEH 0.32 1.28 1.61 20.53 20.42 20.92 21.48 23.42 26.52 2HEHenal 44.73 42.55 42.80 35.76 33.95 33.53 32.36 29.54 24.37 M2EH 0 0.12 0.18 0.24 0.55 0.94 1.62 2.75 4.77

[0042] The low level of 2-ethylhexaldehyde and methyl-2-ethylhexanoate formation prior to introduction of a significant concentration of 2-ethylhexaldehyde was likely due to slow rates of hydrogen transfer reactions in which 2-ethylhexyl enal was hydrogenated, with the resulting 2-ethylhexaldehyde reacting further to methyl-2-ethylhexanoate. Upon introduction of higher concentrations (spiking) of 2-ethylhexaldehyde the desired formation of methyl-2-ethylhexanoate increased significantly. This result points to the importance of 2-ethylhexaldehyde as the reactive species in forming methyl-2-ethylhexanoate, and 2-ethylhexyl enal acting as the hydrogen acceptor which replenishes the concentration of 2-ethylhexaldehyde in the system.

Example 3: Direct Coupling Between 2-ethylhexyl enal, 2-ethylhexaldehyde and Triethylene glycol

[0043] 20.2 g 2-ethylhexyl enal, 20.5 g 2-ethylhexaldehyde, 6 g triethylene glycol, 2 g of 1 wt % Au/TiO.sub.2 (ground), and 0.38 g of 50 wt % NaOH in water were added to a 100 mL autoseal autoclave. The reaction temperature was maintained at 185° C. and the reactor was purged with N.sub.2, then self-pressurized to about 300 psig while stirring at 1000 rpm. Samples were withdrawn after every 60 minutes over a total reaction time of 6 hours. Trace amount of triethylene glycol 2-ethylhexanoate monoester (0.4 wt %) were detected by gas chromatography (GC). 2-ethylhexyl alcohol and 2-ethylhexyl acid were also detected in the mixture. No triethylene glycol 2-ethylhexanoate diester is detected.

Example 4: (Direct Coupling Between 2-ethylhexyl enal, 2-ethylhexaldehyde and Triethylglycol

[0044] 8.4 g 2-ethylhexyl enal, 8.5 g 2-ethylhexaldehyde, 40 g triethylene glycol, 2.45 g of 1 wt % Au/TiO.sub.2 (ground), and 0.51 g of 50 wt % NaOH in water where added to a 100 mL autoseal autoclave. The reaction temperature was maintained at 185° C. The reactor was purged with N.sub.2, then self-pressurized to about 300 psig while stirring at 1000 rpm. Samples were withdrawn after every 60 minutes over a total reaction time of 6 hours. Trace amount of triethylene glycol 2-ethylhexanoate monoester (0.2 wt %) was detected by GC. No triethylene glycol 2-ethylhexanoate diester was detected. 2-ethylhexyl alcohol and 2-ethylhexyl acid were also detected in the mixture.

[0045] These results demonstrate the feasibility of directly coupling an aldehyde with a long chain alcohol in a single reaction step.

[0046] In the specification, there have been disclosed certain embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being set forth in the following claims.