Sealing arrangement between two ring-shaped walls of an aircraft engine

Abstract

A sealing arrangement is provided between inner and outer coaxial ring-shaped walls of an aircraft engine. The outer wall has an axial end with a U-shaped cross-section parallel to axis, the opening therein being oriented axially in a first direction. The inner wall has an axial end with a U-shaped cross-section parallel to axis, the opening therein being oriented axially in the opposite direction. The U-shaped end of the outer wall includes a ring-shaped free edge axially engaged in the opening in the axial end of the inner wall. The U-shaped end of the inner wall includes a ring-shaped free edge axially engaged in the opening in the axial end of the outer wall. The walls define therebetween a ring-shaped gas channel having a substantially S-shaped axial cross-section.

Claims

1. A sealing arrangement between two annular walls of an aircraft engine, the two annular walls comprising an inner wall and an outer wall coaxially positioned around an axis, wherein: the outer wall comprises an axial end with a cross-section that has the shape of a U having an axis of symmetry arranged parallel to the axis, the U having an opening oriented axially in a first direction; and the inner wall comprises an axial end with a cross-section that has the shape of a U having an axis of symmetry arranged parallel to the axis, the U having an opening oriented axially in a second direction opposite the first direction; the U of the axial end of the outer wall comprising a free annular edge engaged axially in the opening of the axial end of the inner wall, and the U of the cross-section of the axial end of the inner wall comprising a free annular edge engaged axially in the opening of the U of the cross-section of the axial end of the outer wall, so that the inner and outer walls define between them an annular gas passage with an S-shaped axial section, wherein at least one seal is mounted in said annular gas passage, the at least one seal including at least one of a labyrinth seal, a brush seal, and a carbon seal and wherein in the said annular gas passage, radial gaps are provided (i) between the two free annular edges of the walls and (ii) between the free annular edge of each wall and a surface of the other wall, wherein the gaps are equal.

2. The sealing arrangement according to claim 1, wherein said at least one seal is mounted in at least one of the opening of the axial end of the inner wall and the opening of the axial end of the outer wall.

3. The sealing arrangement according to claim 2, wherein the at least one seal is mounted in said annular gas passage between the free annular edge of the U of the cross-section of the axial end of the outer wall and the free annular edge of the U of the axial end of the inner wall.

4. The sealing arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the at least one seal is mounted in said annular gas passage between the free annular edge of the U of the cross-section of the axial end of one of the outer and inner walls or of each inner and outer walls and a surface facing the other wall.

5. The sealing arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the at least one seal comprises one of a brush seal and a carbon seal the at least one seal being mounted between the axial end of the free edge of the U of the cross-section of the axial end of one of the inner and outer walls and the opening of the other of the inner and outer walls.

6. The sealing arrangement according to claim 1, wherein the axial end of one of the inner and outer walls is formed in one piece with the one of the inner and outer walls, and the axial end of the other of the inner and outer walls is formed by an insert on the other of the inner and outer walls.

7. The sealing arrangement according to claim 1, wherein each free annular edge is engaged in one of the openings over an axial distance corresponding to 40% to 60% of the axial dimension of the one of the openings.

8. An aircraft turbomachine comprising at least one arrangement according to claim 1.

9. A sealing arrangement between two annular walls of an aircraft engine, the two annular walls comprising an inner wall and an outer wall coaxially positioned around an axis, wherein: the outer wall comprises an axial end with a cross-section that has the shape of a U having an axis of symmetry arranged parallel to the axis, the U having an opening oriented axially in a first direction; and the inner wall comprises an axial end with a cross-section that has the shape of a U having an axis of symmetry arranged parallel to the axis, the U having an opening oriented axially in a second direction opposite the first direction; the U of the axial end of the outer wall comprising a free annular edge engaged axially in the opening of the axial end of the inner wall, and the U of the cross-section of the axial end of the inner wall comprising a free annular edge engaged axially in the opening of the U of the cross-section of the axial end of the outer wall, so that the inner and outer walls define between them an annular gas passage with an S-shaped axial section, wherein each free annular edge is engaged in one of the openings over an axial distance corresponding to 40% to 60% of the axial dimension of the one of the openings.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) The present invention will be better understood and other details, characteristics and advantages of the present invention will appear more clearly on reading the following description, with reference to the annexed drawings on which:

(2) FIG. 1 represents a perspective view of an aircraft engine with two counter-rotating propellers concerned by the invention.

(3) FIG. 2 represents an axial half-section of the engine of FIG. 1 showing areas using an arrangement according to the invention to ensure the sealing between two cylindrical walls engaged coaxially one inside the other.

(4) FIG. 3 schematically represents a perspective view represented in an axial plane of a sealing arrangement according to the invention.

(5) FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 represent a perspective view represented in an axial plane of the positions of the arrangement in FIG. 3 for different radial displacements between the two cylindrical walls.

DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

(6) FIGS. 1 and 2 present an aircraft engine using the invention with a couple of counter-rotating propellers, 1 and 2. The couple of propellers is placed at the rear of the engine and drives the air circulating around a fairing 3 of revolution enveloping the engine. The engine, of turbomachine type, comprises a gas generator 4, not explained but whose place is indicated by a rectangle, which is fed by a central air inlet. The gas generator 4 rotates a power turbine 5 that drives a power turbine 5 that rotates around the engine axis X, via an epicyclic gearbox, the first propeller 1 in one direction and the second propeller 2 in the opposite direction. The annular exhaust gas duct 6 from the turbine passes between the outer fairing 3, at which the roots of the blades of the propellers 1 and 2 are located, and an inner fairing 7, surrounding the rotating shafts of the propellers. As shown in FIG. 2, there is thus for each propeller, 1 and 2, at the passage of each casing, at least one joint, 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, and 8e, between two substantially cylindrical walls which are in rotation with respect to each other and for which sealing must be ensured. Indeed, on both sides of the walls, at the joint, the gases have different dynamic properties and pressures. Moreover, if we take for example joint 8a of the rotating wall connected at the root of the first propeller 1 with an external fixed fairing element 3, surrounding the exhaust duct 6 at the turbine outlet 5, the thermal expansions of the two parts can be very different since one is in contact with the external ambient air and the other with the hot air leaving the turbine.

(7) FIG. 3 describes an embodiment of a sealing arrangement according to the invention between two annular walls, 9 and 10, nested one inside the other along their common axis X, at a junction such as those described above.

(8) The inner wall 9, coming from the left in the figure, comprises an axial end 11 forming a radially outer return, the axial profile of which has substantially the profile of a U parallel to the axis and open to the left. The axial end 11 thus comprises a first section 12 formed by an element of the inner wall 9 whose cylindrical outer surface of radius R1 is in the extension of the wall 9 on the left. A substantially radial base 13 and a cylindrical free edge 14 whose inner surface is at a radial distance h1 from the outer surface of the inner wall.

(9) Conversely, the outer wall 10, coming from the right in the figure, comprises an axial end 15 forming a radially inner return whose axial profile has substantially a U-shaped profile parallel to the axis and open to the right. This second U thus comprises a first section 16 formed by an external wall element 10 whose internal cylindrical surface of radius R2 is in the extension of the wall on the right. A substantially radial base 17 and a cylindrical free edge 18 whose outer cylindrical surface is at a radial distance h2 from the inner surface of the outer wall.

(10) As shown in FIG. 1, the axial ends, 11 and 15, of the two walls, 9 and 10, interlock with a radial overlap of the free edge 18 of the radial end 15 of the outer wall 10 by the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9.

(11) Note here that the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10 is formed by an insert, which is mounted on the main cylindrical body of the outer wall by a flange 19. This is due to assembly considerations. Thus, the insert with its nesting in the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9 can be installed first, and then the main body of the outer wall 10 can be brought in from the right and fixed at its axial end by the flange 19. The insert also allows increased accessibility in case the sealing arrangements need to be repaired/maintained. However, the presence of a flange 19 is an option depending on the configuration of the parts, which can be either rotors or stators, to which the inner and outer walls are attached.

(12) Here, the radial gap between the free edge 18 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10 and the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9, the radial gap between the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9 and the outer wall 10, and the radial gap between the free edge 18 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10 and the inner wall 9 all have approximately the same value dH. In addition, the two free edges, 18 and 14, overlap axially for a distance L1, which is significantly greater than the thickness of the walls, 9 and 10.

(13) In addition, an axial gap dx1 is provided between the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9 and the base 17 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10. Similarly, an axial gap dx2 is provided between the free edge 18 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10 and the base 13 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9.

(14) In this way, a free annular space with a substantially S-shaped radial cross-section is formed between the axial ends 11 and 15 of the two walls 9 and 10. This free annular space allows the two walls, 9 and 10, to rotate freely relative to each other around the axis X. On the other hand, this free annular space connects an outer cavity through its left axial opening, between the inner wall 9 and the free edge 18 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10, and an inner cavity through its right axial opening, between the outer wall 10 and the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9.

(15) The arrangement comprises a first seal 20 installed between the faces facing the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9 and the free edge 18 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10. The elements of this first seal 20 extend substantially over the entire axial extension L1 of the overlap of the two free edges, 18 and 14.

(16) Several options are available to realize this first seal 20. A first option uses an architecture with labyrinth lips on the faces with an abradable material on the part of the opposite surface facing the lips. A second option is the use of a brush seal. A third option is to mount a carbon seal plated on a sealing track by a spring system. The choice of these different options, known to the person skilled in the art, depends on the nature of the two cavities to be separated. Both may contain air, or one may contain oil and the other air, for example.

(17) The arrangement also comprises a second seal 21 that is installed between the faces facing the free edge 18 in the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10 and the section 12 of the inner wall 9 in the axial end 11. This second seal 21 has an axial extension substantially equal to that L1 of the first seal 20. The same options are available for this second seal 21 as for the first seal.

(18) In an embodiment variant, a third seal 22 is installed between the faces facing the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9 and the section 12 of the outer wall 10 in the axial end 15. This third seal 22 has an axial extension substantially equal to that L1 of the first seal 20. The same options are available for this third seal 22 as for the previous seals.

(19) In another embodiment variant, only the first 20 and third 22 seals are installed.

(20) Advantageously, the sealing arrangement also comprises a fourth seal 23, between the base 17 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10 and the end of the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9, as well as a fifth seal 24, between the base 13 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9 and the end of the free edge 18 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10.

(21) To make these seals, 23 and 24, the option of using a brush seal can be taken. It is also possible to take the option to mount a carbon seal plated on a sealing track by a spring system. These options are to be preferred to a labyrinth because, here, the seal surface is small, limited to the thickness of the wall at the end of the free edge, 14 or 18. As before, the choice of these different options, known to the person skilled in the art, depends on the nature of the two cavities to be separated.

(22) The nested architecture of the arrangement allows, in the case of strong radial displacements, to optimize the leakage rate on an alternation between the activation of the first seal or the second seal. FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 illustrate this property by showing the operation of the arrangement for different variations of the radial gap between the two walls. In this example, the consumption of the clearance is mostly related to the displacement of the inner wall 9.

(23) With reference to FIG. 4, in a cold configuration, where the radius R1 of the inner wall 9 is the smallest, the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9 approaches radially the free edge 18 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 10. The elements of the second seal 21 or the third seal 22, depending on the variant used, may be too open. On the other hand, the first seal 20 provides a sealing because these elements are close together. This first axial seal 20 is said to be optimum in “cold” conditions. With reference to FIG. 5, in a standard configuration, corresponding to the presentation made in FIG. 3, the successive radial clearances between the different nested sections of the axial ends, 11 and 15, of the two walls, 9 and 10, are approximately equal. In the first variant of the embodiment, the first axial seal 20 and the second axial seal 21 are active. In another variant, the third axial seal 22 is also active. Due to the radial gaps between the sections, the individual axial seals are not at their optimum efficiency. However, the nested appearance allows the effect of each seal to be combined in series, which compensates for the mismatch.

(24) With reference to FIG. 6, in a hot configuration, the radius R1 of the inner wall 9 having increased, this results in a small clearance between the free edge 18 of the axial end 15 of the outer wall 19 and the section 12 of the inner wall 9 in the axial end 11, and the same applies to the clearance between the free edge 14 of the axial end 11 of the inner wall 9 and the section 16 of the outer wall 10 in the axial end 15. The first axial seal 20 is not operational because its surfaces are too far apart, but with a small clearance between its surfaces, the second axial seal 21 provides a sealing. It is said to be optimum when “hot”. In the variants where it is available, the third axial seal 22 also provides optimum sealing in this case.

(25) In the embodiment variants where they exist, the radial seals, 23 and 24, between the base, 13 or 17, of one axial end, 11 or 15, and the free edge, 18 or 14, of the other axial end, provide an additional sealing which is added in series to that of the axial seals, 20 or 21, in the S-shaped annular passage of the arrangement.

(26) In FIGS. 4 to 6, the two walls, 9 and 10, are in an average axial position relative to each other. A relatively large axial clearance is left between the bases, 13 or 17, and the free edges, 18 or 14, at the axial end to allow relative axial translations without contact. The operation of the radial seals, 23 and 24, is therefore not necessarily optimum, but it is in addition to that of the axial seals, 20 or 21.

(27) If the two annular walls, 9 and 10, move apart axially, then the bases, 13 and 17, move closer to the free edge, 18 and 14, at the other end and the seals, 23 and 24, can provide an additional strong seal. Otherwise, the effectiveness of the radial seals, 23 and 24, diminishes, but, as shown in FIGS. 4 to 6, sealing is provided anyway by the axial seals, 20 and 21.