METHOD FOR DESIGNING AND OPERATING A WIND POWER PLANT, WIND POWER PLANT, AND WIND FARM

Abstract

A method for designing and operating a wind power plant for generating electrical power from wind, wherein the wind power plant has an aerodynamic rotor with rotor blades of which the blade setting angle can be adjusted, wherein the rotor blades are populated with a plurality of vortex generators between the rotor blade root and the rotor blade tip, characterized in that the population with the vortex generators in the longitudinal direction of the respective rotor blade is carried out up to a radius position which is determined depending on the air density at a site of the wind power plant. A rotor blade of a wind power plant, to an associated wind power plant and to a wind farm.

Claims

1. A method for operating a wind power plant for generating electrical power from wind, wherein the wind power plant has an aerodynamic rotor with a plurality of rotor blades of which the blade setting angle can be adjusted, the method comprising determining a population of a plurality of vortex generators based on an air density at a site of the wind power plant, wherein the population is from the rotor blade root up to a radius position in a longitudinal direction of the respective rotor blade.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein determining the population comprises determining the radius position based on the air density such that a power loss to be expected on account of an increase in an angle of attack on the rotor blade caused by a decreasing air density is compensated for.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein when the air density decreases, the determining the population comprises determining the radius position depending on the air density in such a way that an increase in the blade setting angle is compensated for.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1, comprising arranging the plurality of vortex generators in the population of the respective rotor blade with increasing values for the radius position as the air density decreases.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, comprising setting the blade setting angle depending on the radius position determined for the population with the plurality of vortex generators.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, comprising operating the wind power plant, and wherein determining the population further comprises determining the population further based on a specific rated power at which the wind power plant is operated.

7. The method as claimed in claim 6, wherein a value for the radius position up to which the population of the respective rotor blade with the plurality of vortex generators becomes greater as a tip speed ratio decreases, wherein the tip speed ratio is defined as a ratio of a speed of the rotor blade tip at the rated rotor speed to the rated wind speed when the rated power is reached.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1, comprising storing a plurality of blade setting characteristic curves, and selecting one blade setting characteristic curve from amongst the stored blade setting characteristic curves depending on the radius position determined for the population with the vortex generators, and using the one blade setting characteristic curve for setting the blade setting angle.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising operating the wind power plant at a rated rotor speed depending on the site, and determining the population of the plurality of vortex generators depending on the rated rotor speed.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the radius position is determined depending on a sound level at the site of the wind power plant.

11. A rotor blade comprising: a suction side and a pressure side, and a plurality of vortex generators arranged at least on the suction side between the rotor blade root and the rotor blade tip, wherein the plurality of vortex generators are arranged in a longitudinal direction of the rotor blade up to a radius position depending on a site-specific air density.

12. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 11, wherein arranging the plurality of vortex generators starting from the rotor blade root, in a direction of the rotor blade tip, up to a radius position of the rotor blade is restricted by a site-specific tip speed ratio.

13. A wind power plant comprising: an aerodynamic rotor, a plurality of rotor blades coupled to the aerodynamic rotor, wherein blade setting angles of the plurality of rotor blades are adjustable, wherein the aerodynamic rotor is configured to be operated at a settable rated rotor speed, a plurality of vortex generators on each rotor blade of the plurality of rotor blades, and a control system, wherein the control system is configured to determine a population of the plurality of vortex generators on each rotor blade based on an air density at a site of the wind power plant, wherein the population is from a rotor blade root up to a radius position in a longitudinal direction of the respective rotor blade.

14. The wind power plant as claimed in claim 13, wherein the rotor has at least one rotor blade as claimed in claim 11.

15. A wind farm comprising a plurality of wind power plants as claimed in claim 13.

16. The rotor blade as claimed in claim 12, wherein the radius position increases from a relatively high tip speed ratio to a relatively low tip speed ratio.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

[0039] The invention will be described in more detail below with reference to one possible exemplary embodiment with reference to the appended figures, in which:

[0040] FIG. 1 shows a wind power plant according to the present invention;

[0041] FIG. 2 shows a diagrammatic view of a single rotor blade;

[0042] FIG. 3 shows, by way of example, different curves for angles of attack on the rotor blade given a specific rated power of the wind power plant over the standardized rotor radius for four different operating situations;

[0043] FIG. 4 shows exemplary curves of the lift-to-drag ratio for the four different operating situations of the wind power plant;

[0044] FIG. 5 shows exemplary power curves for different operating situations; and

[0045] FIG. 6 shows, by way of example, two blade setting angle characteristic curves for two different operating situations.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0046] The explanation of the invention on the basis of examples with reference to the figures takes place in a substantially diagrammatic manner, and the elements which are explained in the respective figure can be exaggerated therein for improved illustration and other elements can be simplified. Thus, for example, FIG. 1 illustrates a wind power plant per se diagrammatically, with the result that an arrangement of vortex generators which is provided cannot be seen clearly.

[0047] FIG. 1 shows a wind power plant 100 with a tower 102 and a nacelle 104. A rotor 106 with three rotor blades 108 and a spinner is arranged on the nacelle 104. During operation, the rotor 106 is set in a rotational movement by way of the wind and, as a result, drives a generator in the nacelle 104. The blade angle of the rotor blades 108 can be set. The blade setting angles γ of the rotor blades 108 can be changed by pitch motors which are arranged at rotor blade roots 114 (FIG. 2) of the respective rotor blades 108. The rotor 106 is operated at an adjustable rated rotor speed n. The rotor speed n may differ depending on the operating mode. In a power-optimized operating mode, the rotor 106 can be operated at as high a rated rotor speed as possible, whereas the rotor 106 is operated at a relatively low rotor speed in a part-load operating mode.

[0048] In this exemplary embodiment, the wind power plant 100 is controlled by a control system 200 which is part of a comprehensive control system of the wind power plant 100. The control system 200 is implemented, in general, as part of the control system of the wind power plant 100.

[0049] The wind power plant 100 can be operated in a power-optimized operating mode and optionally also in a part-load operating mode, for example a sound-reduced operating mode, by means of the control system 200. In the power-optimized operating mode, the wind power plant 100, independently of sound level requirements, generates the optimum rated power that can be generated with the wind power plant 100 depending on the air density at the site of the wind power plant 100. In the sound-reduced operating mode, the wind power plant 100 is operated at a rotor speed that is reduced in comparison to the power-optimized operating mode, in order to set a sound level which is less than or equal to a sound level prespecified by sound level requirements. The wind power plant 100 can optionally be designed and operated by means of the control system 200 in such a way that an annual energy production is maximized depending on the air density and while complying with the sound level requirements at the site of the wind power plant 100.

[0050] A plurality of these wind power plants 100 may form part of a wind farm. The wind power plants 100 in this case are subject to a wide variety of environmental conditions, depending on their site. In particular, the characteristics of the wind field to which the wind power plants are exposed during diurnal and seasonal changes may differ greatly. The wind field is characterized by a large number of parameters. The most important wind field parameters are average wind speed, turbulence, vertical and horizontal shear, change in wind direction over height, oblique incident flow and air density. Furthermore, general conditions such as sound level requirements made of the wind power plant may differ depending on its site. These may also differ at different times, for example may be different during the day than at night or at rest times.

[0051] With a view to the wind field parameter air density, one measure for operating a wind power plant provides for countering the increase in the angles of attack on the rotor blade, which increase is caused by the decreasing air density, by way of increasing the blade setting angle γ, which is also called the pitch angle, starting from a certain power in order to avoid the threat of flow separation in the central region of the rotor blade 108, which flow separation would lead to large power losses. This raising of the blade setting angle γ in this case leads to power losses of the wind power plant 100, but these power losses in general turn out to be smaller than the power losses which would occur as a result of the flow separation occurring at the respective rotor blades 108. Furthermore, provision is made to raise the rated speed at sites with a low air density in order to thereby counter the drop in the tip speed ratio caused by the air density.

[0052] It is now proposed to take into consideration a design of the population with vortex generators 118, which design is matched to a site with a relatively low air density ρ.sub.A, as is illustrated in FIG. 2 by way of example. The vortex generators 118 which are fitted over an extended region in the central part of the rotor blade 108 depending on the air density ρ.sub.A determined at a site of the wind power plant 100 prevent flow separation in the central part and as a result it is possible to reduce or even entirely dispense with the raising of the blade setting angle γ, and this can lead to greater production by the wind power plant 100 overall.

[0053] FIG. 2 shows a diagrammatic view of a single rotor blade 108 having a rotor blade leading edge 110 and a rotor blade trailing edge 112. The rotor blade 108 has a rotor blade root 114 and a rotor blade tip 116. The distance between the rotor blade root 114 and the rotor blade tip 116 is called the outside radius R of the rotor blade 108. The distance between the rotor blade leading edge 110 and the rotor blade trailing edge 112 is called the profile depth T. At the rotor blade root 114 or, in general, in the region close to the rotor blade root 114, the rotor blade 108 has a large profile depth T. At the rotor blade tip 116, by contrast, the profile depth T is very much smaller. The profile depth T decreases significantly starting from the rotor blade root 114, in this example after an increase in the blade inner region, up to a middle region. A separation point (not illustrated here) may be provided in the middle region. From the middle region up to the rotor blade tip 116, the profile depth T is almost constant, or the decrease in the profile depth T is significantly reduced.

[0054] The illustration in FIG. 2 shows the suction side of the rotor blade 108. Vortex generators 118 are arranged on the suction side. Alternative refinements of the vortex generators 118 as active or passive elements for influencing flow are conceivable. Whereas the vortex generators 118 in the example illustrated are shown arranged on the suction side of the rotor blade 108, vortex generators 118 on the pressure side of the rotor blade 108 with the population are possible as an alternative or else in addition. The placement of the vortex generators 118 can take place in the region of the rotor blade leading edge 110 or else at another position between the rotor blade leading edge 110 and the rotor blade trailing edge. The extent of the population with the vortex generators 118 begins in the region of the rotor blade root 114 and runs in the direction of the rotor blade tip 116.

[0055] With respect to the rotor 106, the vortex generators 118 extend in the radial direction up to a position PA or PB on the rotor blade 108. In this case, the respective position PA or PB on the rotor blade 108 is specified as the radius position with respect to a standardized radius r/R. The radius position with respect to the standardized radius r/R represents the position on the rotor blade 108 along the rotor blade longitudinal axis as radius r.sub.a, r.sub.b of the respective position P.sub.A, P.sub.B with respect to the outside radius R of the rotor 108 or represents the rotor blade length. As a result, the relevant position P.sub.A or P.sub.B on the rotor blade 108 as the radius position can be indicated by a value in the range of from 0 (zero) to 1 (one).

[0056] FIG. 3 shows, for four exemplary, different operating situations (case 1 to case 4) which are listed in the following table, by way of example different curves 120 (case 1), 122 (case 2), 124 (case 3) and 126 (case 4) at a power in the region of the rated power for angles of attack α on the rotor blade 108 over the radius position r/R. The operating situations case 1 to case 4 differ from one another in respect of the values for air density ρ.sub.A, ρ.sub.B and position P.sub.A, P.sub.B of the population of the rotor blade 108 with vortex generators 118 and a blade setting angle characteristic curve P.sub.ρA, P.sub.ρB selected for operation.

TABLE-US-00001 Table of Operating Situations Case 1 Air density ρ.sub.B, vortex generators up to P.sub.B, blade setting angle characteristic curve P.sub.ρB Case 2 Air density ρ.sub.A, vortex generators up to P.sub.B, blade setting angle characteristic curve P.sub.ρB Case 3 Air density ρ.sub.A, vortex generators up to P.sub.B, blade setting angle characteristic curve P.sub.ρA Case 4 Air density ρ.sub.A, vortex generators up to P.sub.A, blade setting angle characteristic curve P.sub.ρB

[0057] Case 1 is based on the air density ρ.sub.B, for example the standard air density ρ.sub.B=1.225 kg/m.sup.3. For this air density, the wind power plant, owing to the vortex generators arranged up to the position P.sub.B, can be operated with the preferred blade setting angle characteristic curve PρB, without a stall occurring along the rotor blade.

[0058] Cases 2 to 4 are then based on an air density ρ.sub.A that is lower than the air density ρ.sub.B. In case 2, the configuration of case 1 is adopted, that is to say operating parameters that are otherwise the same are used for operation at the lower air density.

Disadvantageous stalls occur here.

[0059] In order to counter these stalls, a blade setting angle characteristic curve PρA is provided in case 3, this ensuring that no stalls occur, but significant production losses likewise occur overall as in case 2 with the blade setting angle characteristic curve PρB.

[0060] Case 4 describes a solution in line with which more reliable operation with the preferred blade setting angle characteristic curve P.sub.ρB in spite of a low air density ρ.sub.A is possible without stalls occurring, owing to the change in the vortex generators up to P.sub.A. As an alternative, a blade setting angle characteristic curve which lies between the blade setting angle characteristic curves P.sub.ρA and P.sub.ρB can be used.

[0061] Specifically, FIG. 3 shows, by way of example, various curves 120, 122, 124, 126 for the angle of attack a at a power close to rated power, e.g., 95% of the rated power, of the wind power plant 100 with respect to the radius position r/R for the four operating situations case 1 to case 4. The curve 120 is established for case 1. The curve 122 is established for case 2. The curve 124 is established for case 3. The curve 126 is established for case 4.

[0062] Furthermore, the maximum permissible angles of attack α.sub.A, α.sub.B, and α.sub.0 or stall angles are illustrated by dashed lines. The maximum permissible angle of attack α.sub.0 is established when there are no vortex generators 118 arranged on the rotor blade 108. The maximum permissible angle of attack α.sub.B is established when population with vortex generators 118 up to position P.sub.B on the rotor blade 108 is provided, this corresponding to a radius position r/R of approximately 0.55 in the exemplary embodiment illustrated. The maximum permissible angle of attack α.sub.A is established when population with vortex generators 118 up to position P.sub.A on the rotor blade 108 is provided, this corresponding to a radius position r/R of approximately 0.71.

[0063] The sudden increases in the maximum permissible angles of attack α.sub.A, an at the radius position r/R of approximately 0.71 or 0.55 and the permissible angles of attack α.sub.A, an that have risen sharply in the direction of the blade root 114 are caused by the vortex generators 118 that are fitted. The population of the rotor blade 108 with vortex generators 118 switches the flow separation to significantly increased angles of attack α.sub.A, an and therefore allows the profile to be operated in a considerably extended angle of attack range.

[0064] Without the use of vortex generators 118 up to the radius position r/R of below 0.71 or 0.55, the maximum permissible angles of attack α.sub.A, an until this radius range is reached would be significantly lowered, this being indicated in FIG. 3 by the line for the maximum permissible angle of attack α.sub.0. It is clear that the angles of attack α occurring at the air density ρ.sub.B in this rotor blade range would even already in case 1, indicated by the line 120, lead to the maximum permissible angles of attack α.sub.0 being overshot and therefore to the stall in the absence of vortex generators 118.

[0065] If the wind power plant 100 and the respective rotor blade 108 are operated at the reduced air density ρ.sub.A, as is assumed in case 2, without further measures, an angle of attack curve, as illustrated by way of example by the line 122 in FIG. 3, can be established. In case 2, the maximum permissible angles of attack an are overshot between the radius positions 0.55<r/R<0.78 and power-reducing flow separations occur there. The overshootings of the maximum permissible angles of attack an starting from the position P.sub.B in the direction of the blade tip 116 typically occur in case 2 since the increases in the angle of attack, caused by the drop in air density, increase from the blade tip 116 to the blade root 114, i.e., the further the profile section is located on the rotor blade 108 on the inside in the radial direction, the higher are the increases in the angle of attack experienced by the profile section. In other words, the overshootings of the maximum permissible angles of attack α.sub.B decrease in the direction of the blade tip 116, wherein the greatest risk of the angle of attack being overshot is at the position P.sub.B.

[0066] This relationship is clarified by the illustration in FIG. 4. FIG. 4 illustrates exemplary curves 128, 130, 132, 134 for the lift-to-drag ratio for the four different operating situations case 1 to case 4. The curve 128 is established for case 1. The curve 130 is established for case 2. The curve 132 is established for case 3. The curve 134 is established for case 4.

[0067] For case 1, it can be seen in the first instance that the lift-to-drag ratios according to the curve 128 up to a radius position r/R<0.55 are small and rise suddenly starting from this radius position r/R and increase toward the outside to the rotor blade tip 116, to higher radius positions r/R>0.55. The low values for the lift-to-drag ratios in the curve 128 are due to the population with vortex generators 118 which generally lead to increased drag coefficients.

[0068] The curves 130, 132, 134 of the lift-to-drag ratios in cases 2 to 4 are substantially qualitatively similar to the curve 128 up to the radius position r/R of approximately 0.55. For case 2, it can be seen with reference to curve 130 that the lift-to-drag ratios significantly drop to a low level starting from the position P.sub.B, up to which the population with vortex generators 118 is provided in case 2, at a radius position r/R=0.55, this being associated with the flow separation occurring there. In case 2, illustrated by way of example, the flow separation is limited to a central region of the rotor blade 108 in the radial direction, so that in case 2 the lift-to-drag ratios in the outer region r/R>0.8 settle at the level with separation-free flow around the rotor blade region there.

[0069] In order to avoid this undesired phenomenon of flow separation on the rotor blade 108, the overshooting of the angles of attack α.sub.B is countered according to the prior art by way of the wind power plant 100 increasing the blade setting angle γ starting from a wind speed or a power starting from which the overshooting of the angles of attack α.sub.B is expected. Therefore, for example, a blade setting angle γ which is characteristic of the air density ρ.sub.A, that is to say a blade setting angle characteristic curve P.sub.ρA, is selected. The increase in the blade setting angle leads to a reduction in the angles of attack a on the rotor blade 108 over the entire rotor radius R, so that the angles of attack α are again in a permissible range in the previously critical rotor blade region, this being illustrated by the curve 124 in FIG. 3 for case 3.

[0070] However, this procedure has the disadvantage that, as a result of increasing the blade setting angles γ of the rotor blades 108, the so-called pitching, the angles of attack a are also reduced in the outer region of the rotor blade 108, i.e., also in regions where there is typically no risk of flow separation. Therefore, on account of the pitching, the reduction in the angle of attack can lead directly to power losses of the wind power plant 100.

[0071] It is therefore proposed that the population with the vortex generators 118 in the longitudinal direction of the respective rotor blade 108 is carried out up to a radius position r/R which is determined depending on the air density ρ.sub.A or ρ.sub.B of the wind power plant 100 determined at the site. As a result, the described disadvantage of the power loss of the wind power plant 100 which results from the pitching for compensating for the change in the air density can be reduced in particular.

[0072] As already discussed further above, the largest increases in the angle of attack occur in the central part of the rotor blade 108 during operation of the wind power plant 100 at relatively low air densities ρ.sub.A. This is the case in particular at radius positions which are adjacent in the radial direction to the position P.sub.B of vortex generators 118 that are already fitted. In order to counter this, it is provided in the case of operation of the wind power plant 100 at sites with a relatively low air density ρ.sub.A to extend the population of the rotor blades 108 with vortex generators 118 radially beyond the position P.sub.B up to a position P.sub.A. As a result, the risk of flow separations in the central part of the rotor blade, in particular between position P.sub.B and position P.sub.A, is countered.

[0073] A further aspect is that of adjusting the control of the blade setting angles γ at sites with a relatively low air density ρ.sub.A during the extended population or fitting of vortex generators 118 on the rotor blades 108 in such a way that the blade setting angles γ are reduced at sites with a relatively low air density ρ.sub.A. The angle of attack curve for an exemplary procedure according to this control is illustrated in FIG. 3 by the line 126 for the operating situation case 4. Owing to the population of the respective rotor blade 108 with vortex generators 118 beyond the position P.sub.B, the maximum permissible angles of attack as are increased between the radius positions 0.55<r/R<0.71. Therefore, angles of attack α which are in the permissible range are established in this rotor blade section, i.e., between the radius positions 0.55<r/R<0.71, during operation of the wind power plant 100. Furthermore, it is clear that the angles of attack a on the entire rotor blade 108 have risen in comparison to case 3, illustrated by the line 124, this leading to production gains due to an increased power draw, primarily in the outer part of the rotor blade, by the wind power plant 100. The pitch motors are driven by the control system 200.

[0074] The population of rotor blades 108 with vortex generators 118 is accompanied by a reduction in the lift-to-drag ratios, as was discussed further above. With reference to the illustration in FIG. 4, the problem of reducing the lift-to-drag ratio by population with the vortex generators 118 is explained for the operating situation in case 4. By way of extending the population with vortex generators 118 up to a radius position r/R=0.71 in position P.sub.A, the lift-to-drag ratio up to this position remains at a lower level than is the case in the operating situations case 1 and case 3. However, with suitable design, more power is again generated in the outer region of the rotor blade 108, i.e., a position with a radius position r/R>0.71, this being associated with increases in production which are then established.

[0075] This increase in production due to increasing generation of power in the outer region of the rotor blade 108 is shown by way of example in FIG. 5. FIG. 5 shows, by way of example, different power curves 136, 138, 140 for the operating situations case 1, case 3 and case 4. The power curve 136 is established in case 1, the power curve 138 is established in case 3 and the power curve 140 is established in case 4.

[0076] By way of comparing initially the operating situations in case 1 and case 3, which differ only by way of the operation of the wind power plant 100 at different air densities ρ.sub.A and ρ.sub.B, it can be determined that the power curve 136 drops to power curve 138 when a changeover is made from the relatively high air density ρ.sub.B to the relatively low air density ρ.sub.A. This sharp drop in the power curve 136 in case 1 to the power curve 138 in case 3 is the result of the reduction in density and additionally the associated increase in the blade setting angle γ for ensuring separation-free flow around the respective rotor blade 108. For case 4, an increased power draw by the wind power plant 100 is established starting from a wind speed v′ and a power P′. When this power P′ is reached, according to case 4, with population of the respective rotor blade 108 with vortex generators 118 up to the position P.sub.A depending on the air density ρ.sub.A determined at the site of the wind power plant 100, the control of the blade setting angle γ is based on a blade setting angle value that is reduced in comparison to the blade setting angle value that is used as a basis for control of the blade setting angle γ in case 3. This power draw, which is increased until the rated power P.sub.rated is reached, in case 4 leads to the production gains by way of which the increased drag in the region of the additional population by vortex generators 118 beyond position P.sub.B up to position P.sub.A can be compensated for.

[0077] FIG. 6 shows, by way of example, two blade setting angle characteristic curves 142, 144 for two different operating situations. The blade setting angle characteristic curve 142 is based on the operating situation in case 3 of control of the blade setting angle γ. The blade setting angle characteristic curve 144 is based on the operating situation in case 4 of control of the blade setting angle γ by the control system 200. As can be seen from the curves 142, 144, the wind power plant 100 in case 4 can be operated with a smaller increase in the blade setting angle γ than is possible in case 3 when a standardized power P′/P.sub.rated is reached.

[0078] In case 3, starting from the standardized power P′/P.sub.rated with site-independent population of the rotor blade 108 with vortex generators 118 up to the position P.sub.B, the relatively low air density ρ.sub.A prevailing at the site of the wind power plant 100 is countered by the pitching with large blade setting angles γ. In case 4 however, starting from the standardized power P′/P.sub.rated with site-dependent population of the rotor blade 108 with vortex generators 118 up to the position P.sub.A, pitching with smaller blade setting angles γ is rendered possible, as a result of which the reduction in the angle of attack turns out to be smaller.

[0079] A further aspect takes into account that site-dependent rated powers P.sub.rated are provided for operational management for one wind power plant type. In this case, the rated power P.sub.rated can be increased by increasing the rated speed. Given the same power, relatively high rated speeds lead to relatively high tip speed ratios in the region of the rated power P.sub.rated and therefore to reduced angles of attack α. The risk of flow separation is accordingly reduced.

[0080] In return, this leads to fitting of vortex generators in the radial direction being able to be reduced, and this can lead to less noise and to increases in power. It may therefore be advantageous to make provision for the rotor blades 108 of wind power plants 100 of one plant type which are operated at different rated powers P.sub.rated to also be populated with vortex generators 118 up to different positions P.sub.A, P.sub.B in the radial direction in such a way that the lower the rated power P.sub.rated or rated rotor speed, the further to the outside vortex generators 118 are fitted.

[0081] As an alternative or in addition to the rated power P.sub.rated or rated rotor speed, a further suitable reference variable which is used for adjusting the population with the vortex generators 118 is accordingly the tip speed ratio of the wind power plant 100. When the rotor speed is constant and the power is relatively low, this leads to a relatively high tip speed ratio, wherein the radius position r/R up to which the rotor blade 108 is populated with vortex generators 118 is reduced, that is to say is moved closer to the rotor blade root 114, based on this relatively high tip speed ratio. Accordingly, the radius position r/R can be increased, that is to say moved closer to the rotor blade tip 116, with a dropping rotor speed and a constant power.

[0082] If both the rotor speed and the power drop, the ratio determines whether the tip speed ratio ultimately drops or increases. The question of whether the tip speed ratio drops or increases is not clear without more precise information. The ultimately increasing or dropping tip speed ratio can then preferably be used to determine the radius position r/R up to which the rotor blades are populated with vortex generators.

[0083] The population of the rotor blade 108 with vortex generators 118 can optionally also be additionally carried out depending on a sound level to be set at the site of the wind power plant 100. For example, the production quantity or another parameter depending on the rotor speed, blade setting angle of the rotor blades and radius position up to which the population with the vortex generators in the longitudinal direction of the respective rotor blade is carried out can be iteratively optimized in relation to one another depending on the air density and the sound level to be set at the site of the wind power plant, until a boundary condition is satisfied. The boundary condition may be, for example, that the difference between production quantities established in two successive iteration steps is lower than a prespecified limit value. This can make it possible to achieve a maximum production quantity not only taking into account the air density but additionally also the sound level requirements at the site of the wind power plant.