METHOD FOR PRODUCING BLANK, METHOD FOR PRODUCING PRESS-FORMED PART, METHOD FOR JUDGING SHAPE, PROGRAM FOR JUDGING SHAPE, APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING BLANK, AND BLANK

Abstract

The present invention has as its technical problem to provide a punching method able to stably secure a stretch-flangeability equal to or greater than the case of using a punch having a flat blade at its bottom surface. The punching method of the present invention is a method of punching a metal sheet using a punching and shearing device provided with a punch having an upper blade having a horizontal part with respect to the cutting line in part and having parts other than the horizontal part comprised of inclined parts and a die having a lower blade wherein the upper blade used for the punching process has a shape where the inclined parts first contact the metal sheet at the time of a punching process.

Claims

1. A method for producing a blank comprising by using a punching and shearing device having a punch having an upper blade and a die having a lower blade, punching a metal sheet placed between the punch and the die, the upper blade comprising a first inclined part, second inclined part, and third inclined part provided in that order in a cutting line direction of the metal sheet, an angle θ.sub.1 of the first inclined part with respect to the metal sheet in the cutting line direction, an angle θ.sub.2 of the second inclined part with respect to the metal sheet in the cutting line direction, and an angle θ.sub.3 of the third inclined part with respect to the metal sheet in the cutting line direction satisfying θ.sub.2≤θ.sub.1/2 and θ.sub.2≤θ.sub.3/2, and at the time of the punching, the first inclined part and the third inclined part contacting the metal sheet, then the second inclined part contacting the metal sheet, wherein, in a point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n) of the shape of the upper blade comprising sets of cutting line direction positions (x.sub.n) and displacements (y.sub.n) of the upper blade along the direction of movement of the punch corresponding to the x.sub.n in a direction away from the metal sheet, a second order difference quotient J2n=(y.sub.n+1−2y.sub.n+y.sub.n−1)/(Δx).sup.2, a maximum value J2.sub.max of the second order difference quotient, and J3.sub.n=J2.sub.n/|J.sub.2 max| are defined, a first point where an absolute value of J3.sub.n becomes a predetermined threshold value δ.sub.2 or more is a boundary position of the first inclined part and the second inclined part, and a last point is a boundary position of the second inclined part and the third inclined part, and θ.sub.1, θ.sub.2, and θ.sub.3 mean respectively the average values of the maximum values and minimum values of the angles formed with the metal sheet by tangents at any points of the first inclined part, the second inclined part, and the third inclined part.

2. The method for producing a blank according to claim 1, wherein the angle θ.sub.2 of the second inclined part with respect to the metal sheet in the cutting line direction satisfies θ.sub.2≤3.0°.

3. The method for producing a blank according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises before the punching, a step of judging a shape of the upper blade before stamping and a step of adjusting a shear angle of the upper blade based on the result of judgment of the shape of the upper blade.

4. A method for producing a press-formed part comprising press-forming a blank obtained by the method according to claim 1 to obtain a press-formed part.

5. A method for judging a shape of an upper blade used in the method according to claim 3, the method for judging a shape comprising a step of inputting a point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n) of the shape of the upper blade comprised of sets of cutting line direction positions (x.sub.n) and displacements (y.sub.n) of the upper blade along the direction of movement of the punch corresponding to the x.sub.n in a direction away from the metal sheet, a step of calculating a first-order difference quotient J1.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−y.sub.n)/Δx for the input point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n), a step of calculating a second order difference quotient J2.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−2y.sub.n+y.sub.n−1)/(Δx).sup.2, a step of calculating a maximum value J2.sub.max of the second order difference quotient, a step of calculating a type judgment value J3.sub.n=J2.sub.n/J.sub.2 max|, and a step of judging it is necessary to adjust a shear angle of the upper blade if an absolute value J3.sub.n is a predetermined threshold value δ.sub.2 or more and J3.sub.n is positive at one or both of a boundary of the second inclined part and the first inclined part and a boundary of the second inclined part and the third inclined part.

6. A program for judging a shape of an upper blade used in the method according to claim 3, the program executing a step of inputting a point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n) of the shape of the upper blade comprised of sets of cutting line direction positions (x.sub.n) and displacements (y.sub.n) of the upper blade along the direction of movement of the punch corresponding to the x.sub.n in a direction away from the metal sheet, a step of calculating a first-order difference quotient J1.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−y.sub.n)/Δx for the input point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n), a step of calculating a second order difference quotient J2.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−2y.sub.n+y.sub.n−1)/(Δx).sup.2, a step of calculating a maximum value J2.sub.max of the second order difference quotient, a step of calculating a type judgment value J3.sub.n=J2.sub.n/|J.sub.2 max|, and a step of judging it is necessary to adjust a shear angle of the upper blade if an absolute value J3.sub.n is a predetermined threshold value δ.sub.2 or more and J3.sub.n is positive at one or both of a boundary of the second inclined part and the first inclined part and a boundary of the second inclined part and the third inclined part.

7. An apparatus for producing a blank used in the method according to claim 3, the apparatus comprising an input unit for inputting a point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n) of the shape of the upper blade comprised of sets of cutting line direction positions (x.sub.n) and displacements (y.sub.n) of the upper blade along the direction of movement of the punch corresponding to the x.sub.n in a direction away from the metal sheet, a first calculating part for calculating a first-order difference quotient J1.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−y.sub.n)/Δx for the input point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n), a second calculating part for calculating a second order difference quotient J2.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−2y.sub.n+y.sub.n−1)/(Δx).sup.2, a third calculating part for calculating a maximum value J2.sub.max of the second order difference quotient, a fourth calculating part for calculating a type judgment value J3.sub.n=J2.sub.n/|J.sub.2 max|, and a judging part for judging it is necessary to adjust a shear angle of the upper blade if an absolute value J3.sub.n is a predetermined threshold value δ.sub.2 or more and J3.sub.n is positive at one or both of a boundary of the second inclined part and the first inclined part and a boundary of the second inclined part and the third inclined part.

8. A blank having a sheared end face comprising a region A of a width of 5 mm surrounded by two vertical lines drawn in the thickness direction in the sheared end face, the area ratio of the secondary sheared surface at that region A being A.sub.2/2 or less, the radius of curvature of the region A in a top view being ½ or less of R, wherein A.sub.2 means an area ratio of a secondary sheared surface of an entire range of a sheared end face, and R means a center value of a radius of curvature of an entire range of a blank line in a top view.

9. The blank according to claim 8, wherein the area ratio of the sheared surface at the region A is not more than 80% of the area ratio of the sheared end face at the region excluding the region A from the entire range of the sheared end face.

10. The blank according to claim 8, wherein a change in the area ratio of the sheared surface in the sheet width direction of the region A is within ±20%.

11. The method for producing a blank according to claim 2, wherein the method comprises before the punching, a step of judging a shape of the upper blade before stamping and a step of adjusting a shear angle of the upper blade based on the result of judgment of the shape of the upper blade.

12. A method for producing a press-formed part comprising press-forming a blank obtained by the method according to claim 2 to obtain a press-formed part.

13. A method for producing a press-formed part comprising press-forming a blank obtained by the method according to claim 3 to obtain a press-formed part.

14. The blank according to claim 9, wherein a change in the area ratio of the sheared surface in the sheet width direction of the region A is within ±20%.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0031] FIG. 1 is a view schematically showing a punching process.

[0032] FIG. 2 is a view schematically showing the features of a punched surface 8.

[0033] FIG. 3 is a view schematically showing a punching process by a conventional inclined blade, where (a) is a front elevation and (b) is a side view showing a cross-section along the line A-A of (a)

[0034] FIG. 4 is a view schematically showing a punching and shearing device applying an inclined blade partially having a horizontal part with respect to a cutting line direction, where (a) is a front elevation and (b) is a side view showing a cross-section along the line B-B of (a).

[0035] FIG. 5 gives views showing shapes of punches with shear angles used in the study of the present invention.

[0036] FIG. 6 gives views showing the configuration of a drum type stretch flange test die used in the study of the present invention, wherein (a) is a perspective view, (b) is a front view, and (c) is a side view.

[0037] FIG. 7 is a view showing a shape of a punched part used in the study of the present invention.

[0038] FIG. 8 is a view showing results of a survey of fracture limit strain for samples punched using different shapes of shear angle type punches.

[0039] FIG. 9 gives views schematically showing an example of a stretch flange part, wherein (a) is a view showing a blank (workpiece) before formation of a flange and (b) is a view showing a member after formation of a flange.

[0040] FIG. 10 is a view showing the shape of a punch including horizontal parts at two ends of an upper blade.

[0041] FIG. 11 is a flow chart for judging a type of shape of a punch from 2D shape data of a punch in the present invention.

[0042] FIG. 12 is an example of judgment of a type of shape of a punch from 2D shape data of the punch in the present invention.

[0043] FIG. 13 is an example of judgment of a type of shape of a punch from 2D shape data of the punch in the present invention.

[0044] FIG. 14 is an example of judgment of a type of shape of a punch from 2D shape data of the punch in the present invention.

[0045] FIG. 15 is an example of judgment of a type of shape of a punch from 2D shape data of the punch in the present invention.

[0046] FIG. 16 is an example of judgment of a type of shape of a punch from 2D shape data of the punch in the present invention.

[0047] FIG. 17 is a view explaining a sheared surface of a blank obtained by the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0048] First, the details of the study conducted by the inventors leading to completion of the present invention will be explained.

[0049] The inventors intensively studied the relationship between four patterns of shapes of punches shown in FIG. 5 and the stretch-flangeability of a punched surface 8 for a workpiece 1 punched by a punch 2.

[0050] FIG. 5 shows shapes of punches when viewed from the front. (a) to (c) show inclined blades having a first inclined part, second inclined part, and third inclined part in that order in the cutting line direction. The first inclined part forms an angle θ.sub.1 with the metal sheet in the cutting line direction, the second inclined part forms an angle θ.sub.2 with the metal sheet in the cutting line direction, and the third inclined part forms an angle θ.sub.3 with the metal sheet in the cutting line direction.

[0051] Here, in a point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n) of the shape of the upper blade comprised of sets of cutting line direction positions (x.sub.n) and displacements (y.sub.n) of the upper blade along the direction of movement of the punch corresponding to the x.sub.n in a direction away from the metal sheet, a second order difference quotient J2.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−2y.sub.n+y.sub.n−1)/(Δx).sup.2, a maximum value J2.sub.max of the second order difference quotient, and J3.sub.n=J2.sub.n|J.sub.2 max| are defined, a first point where an absolute value of J3.sub.n becomes a predetermined threshold value δ.sub.2 or more is a boundary position of the first inclined part and the second inclined part, and a last point is a boundary position of the second inclined part and the third inclined part.

[0052] Further, θ.sub.1, θ.sub.2, and θ.sub.3 are respectively the average values of the maximum values and minimum values of the angles formed with the metal sheet by tangents at any points of the first inclined part, the second inclined part, and the third inclined part. In the examples of FIG. 5, the first inclined part, second inclined part, and third inclined part are shaped straight in the cutting line directions. The angles with the metal sheet which any tangents in the cutting line directions form at the inclined parts are constant. Further, in the examples of FIG. 5, θ.sub.1=θ.sub.3 and θ.sub.2=0.0°.

[0053] (a) shows a shape with a horizontal part provided between the R shear angle part and reverse shear angle part therefore a shape where the shear angle parts first penetrate the workpiece and the center horizontal part finally penetrates it (below, referred to as “TYPE-A”). (b) shows a shape where a horizontal part is provided at part of a shear angle part inclined in one direction therefore a shape where one of the shear angle parts first penetrates the workpiece, then the center part and after that the other shear angle part penetrate the workpiece (below, referred to as “TYPE-B”). (c) shows a shape where a horizontal part is provided at a wedge therefore a shape where the center horizontal part first penetrates the workpiece and finally the shear angle part penetrates it (below, referred to as “TYPE-C”). (d) shows a flat blade with no inclined parts (below, referred to as “TYPE-1”).

[0054] For TYPE-A, TYPE-B, and TYPE-C, further, four types of punches changed in widths of horizontal parts and shear angles were prepared.

[0055] These shapes of punches were used for punching using the drum type stretch flange test die shown in FIG. 6. The blank lines, as shown in FIG. 7, seen from a top view, are the same with R30 mm and an opening angle of θ120°. Only the punches were changed and the patterns of shear angle parts and horizontal parts were changed. The punches were arranged so that at the time of the punching process, the center positions of the second inclined parts of the punches in the cutting line directions became positions corresponding to the center positions of the blank lines.

[0056] The 13 types of drum type test punches shown in Table 1 were prepared and used for punching processes in a 60 ton crank press. The test materials were made thickness 1.4 mm JSC980Y and the punching clearances were made constant ones of 12.6% of the sheet thicknesses of the workpieces.

[0057] After punching, the samples were subjected to side bend tests to investigate the fracture limit strains. Each sample was tested twice. The results are shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Width “w” of second inclined θ.sub.1 Fracture Name of part (θ.sub.3) θ.sub.2 limit shape of punch [mm] [°] [°] strain TYPE-1 — 0.0 0.0 0.23 0.22 TYPE-A-1 20.0 0.5 0.0 0.24 0.25 TYPE-A-2 20.0 1.0 0.0 0.26 0.26 TYPE-A-3 40.0 0.5 0.0 0.24 0.26 TYPE-A-4 40.0 1.0 0.0 0.26 0.26 TYPE-B-1 20.0 0.5 0.0 0.24 0.25 TYPE-B-2 20.0 1.0 0.0 0.26 0.24 TYPE-B-3 40.0 0.5 0.0 0.25 0.25 TYPE-B-4 40.0 1.0 0.0 0.26 0.24 TYPE-C-1 20.0 0.5 0.0 0.20 0.22 TYPE-C-2 20.0 1.0 0.0 0.19 0.22 TYPE-C-3 40.0 0.5 0.0 0.12 0.12 TYPE-C-4 40.0 1.0 0.0 0.23 0.22

[0058] FIG. 8 shows the results of Table 1. Group 1 gives the test results for TYPE-A-1, TYPE-B-1, and TYPE-C-1 of Table 1, Group 2 gives the test results for TYPE-A-2, TYPE-B-2, and TYPE-C-2 of Table 1, Group 3 gives the test results for TYPE-A-3, TYPE-B-3, and TYPE-C-3 of Table 1, and Group 4 gives the test results for TYPE-A-4, TYPE-B-4, TYPE-C-4 of Table 1. The “Xx-y” of the graph abscissas (X is either of A, B, and C and “x”, “y” are numerical values) means the y-th test result of TYPE-X-x. The horizontal lines in the graphs are the average value of TYPE-1, while the bars are the two test results for the four types of samples of TYPE-A, TYPE-B, and TYPE-C. The ordinates of the graphs show the fracture limit strain.

[0059] The specific method for the side bend test is disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2009-145138.

[0060] Specifically, the side bend test machine has a pair of arm parts attached able to pivot at support points of respectively different positions, a pair of holding parts at the front end parts of the arm parts for fastening the top and bottom surfaces of the two end parts of test pieces having marking lines or mark points at their top surfaces or bottom surfaces together with the arm parts, and load applying means for applying loads to the rear ends of the pair of arm parts. The pair of arm parts are configured so that their leg parts cross each other. Further, by applying loads to the rear ends by the load applying means and by the front end parts of the pair of arm parts moving in respectively opposite directions to separate while centered about their respective support points, this has the function of imparting tension and bending deformation to the end faces in the sheet thickness direction at the center parts of the test pieces in the longitudinal direction fastened by the arm parts and holding parts.

[0061] Further, using the side bend test machine, the top and bottom surfaces of the two end parts of the test pieces with marking lines or mark points on their top surfaces or bottom surfaces are fastened by the arm parts and holding parts at the front end parts of the pair of arm parts, then loads are applied to the rear ends of the pair of arm parts by the load applying means to impart tension and bending deformation so that the end faces in the sheet thickness direction at the center parts of the test pieces in the longitudinal direction are spread apart. Based on an image obtained by a first observing means stored by a storage means, strain when a crack runs through the end face in the thickness direction of a test piece observed by the first observing means is calculated based on the marking lines or mark points observed by two observing means.

[0062] As will be understood from FIG. 8, in the case of the shape of TYPE-C, it was confirmed that the break strain becomes smaller than the case of using a flat blade, that is, the stretch-flangeability sometimes falls. As will be understood from these results, it is possible to avoid a drop in the stretch-flangeability by checking the shape of the upper blade of the punch in advance so as not to perform a punching process by a punch of TYPE-C, that is, a shape of the upper blade of (c), where the horizontal part of the upper blade first penetrates the workpiece.

[0063] In other words, it is possible to avoid a drop in the stretch-flangeability by using a punch like TYPE-A or TYPE-B where the inclined parts first penetrate the workpiece. The inclined parts first penetrating the workpiece may be inclined parts at the two sides of a horizontal part like in TYPE-A or may be only an inclined part at one side of a horizontal part like in TYPE-B.

[0064] The cause of the drop in the stretch-flangeability in the TYPE-C may be as follows:

[0065] When using a punching process to form a flange at a workpiece 1 shaped such as in FIG. 9(a) and making the scheduled stretch flange part 22 the stretch flange part 21, tensile stress is applied to the punched surface 8 (cut surface). The tensile stress becomes largest at the center of the stretch flange part 21.

[0066] If the upper blade of the punch is the shape of TYPE-C, at the start of the punching process, only the horizontal part of the upper blade penetrates near the center of the scheduled stretch flange part. At this time, the horizontal part of the upper blade does not have the effect of reduction of load due to a shear angle, so the situation becomes one where the workpiece cannot be easily penetrated, formation of a fracture surface is delayed, and the sheared surface ratio increases. As a result, the work hardening of the workpiece becomes greater. This part becomes a part where tensile stress is applied the most at the time of formation of a flange, so the stretch-flangeability falls.

[0067] Furthermore, punches with lengths W of the second inclined part and angles θ.sub.1, θ.sub.2, θ.sub.3 of the first, second, and third inclined parts changed were used for similar punching processes. After punching, the samples were investigated for fracture limit strain. The results are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Width “w” of second inclined θ.sub.1 Fracture Name of part (θ.sub.3) θ.sub.2 limit shape of punch [mm] [°] [°] strain TYPE-A-5 10.0 1.0 0.0 0.26 0.25 TYPE-A-6 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.26 0.25 TYPE-A-7 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.20 0.20 TYPE-A-8 40.0 0.1 0.0 0.23 0.22 TYPE-A-9 40.0 5.0 0.0 0.24 0.25 TYPE-B-5 10.0 1.0 0.0 0.25 0.25 TYPE-B-6 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.20 0.20 TYPE-B-7 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.20 0.20 TYPE-B-8 40.0 0.1 0.0 0.23 0.22 TYPE-B-9 40.0 5.0 0.0 0.25 0.25 TYPE-C-5 10.0 1.0 0.0 0.20 0.20 TYPE-C-6 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.20 0.20 TYPE-C-7 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.20 0.20 TYPE-C-8 40.0 0.1 0.0 0.23 0.23 TYPE-C-9 40.0 0.5 0.0 0.21 0.22

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Width “w” of second inclined θ.sub.1 Fracture Name of part (θ.sub.3) θ.sub.2 limit shape of punch [mm] [°] [°] strain TYPE-A-10 40.0 1.0 0.5 0.25 0.25 TYPE-A-11 40.0 2.0 1.0 0.24 0.24 TYPE-A-12 40.0 6.0 3.0 0.17 0.17 TYPE-A-13 40.0 0.8 0.5 0.24 0.24 TYPE-B-10 40.0 1.0 0.5 0.25 0.25 TYPE-B-11 40.0 2.0 1.0 0.24 0.24 TYPE-B-12 40.0 6.0 3.0 0.15 0.15 TYPE-B-13 40.0 0.8 0.5 0.24 0.24 TYPE-C-10 40.0 1.0 0.5 0.20 0.20 TYPE-C-11 40.0 2.0 1.0 0.20 0.20 TYPE-C-12 40.0 6.0 3.0 0.15 0.15 TYPE-C-13 40.0 0.8 0.5 0.23 0.23

[0068] From the above results, it will be understood that when looking at the length W of the second inclined part, if W=3.0 mm, the effect of improvement of the fracture limit strain is small and that W≥5.0 mm is preferably satisfied. Further, it will be understood that the effect is obtained even when the angles of the first and third inclined parts are θ.sub.1=θ.sub.3=5.0°, but when θ.sub.1=θ.sub.3=0.1°, the effect is small. Further, it will be understood that the angle of the second inclined part preferably satisfies θ.sub.2≤1.0°. Furthermore, it will be understood that if the difference of the angle of the first (third) inclined part and the angle of the second inclined part is small, the effect is small and that θ.sub.2≤θ.sub.1/2(θ.sub.2≤θ.sub.3/2) is preferably satisfied.

[0069] Note that, as will be understood from Table 2, in the case of W=5.0 mm, with TYPE-A, the fracture limit strain becomes larger compared with TYPE-B. This is due to the fact that in the case of TYPE-A, the horizontal part penetrates in the state where the inclined parts at the two sides have already penetrated, while in the case of TYPE-B, the horizontal part penetrates in the state where one inclined part remains. As a result, it is believed a difference arises in the range of W in which a high stretch-flangeability can be secured. That is, it will be understood that with TYPE-A, a high stretch-flangeability can be secured over a broader range than TYPE-B and therefore it is superior to TYPE-B.

[0070] Furthermore, a punch shown in FIG. 10 including horizontal parts at the two ends of the upper blade was used to conduct similar tests. As a result of two tests, the fracture limit strains were 0.22 and 0.21. No effect of improvement of fracture limit strain could be seen. This is believed to be because the horizontal parts not having the effect of reduction of load due to the shear angle first penetrated the workpiece.

[0071] Next, the steps in a method for judging the shape of the upper blade of a punch will be explained.

[0072] The shape of the upper blade of a punch, as illustrated above, has a width of the horizontal part of tens of mm and a shear angle of about 1.0°, so visually judging the shape is extremely difficult. Therefore, a laser displacement meter or a contact type 3D shape measuring apparatus etc. is used to measure the shape of the upper blade, but according to the present invention, the following method is used to simply judge from the measurement data of the shape whether the shape of the upper blade of the punch is a shape suitable for punching.

[0073] First, 2D data of the inclined upper blade of the punch measured by a laser displacement meter or a contact type 3D shape measurement apparatus etc. is input. The 2D data is a point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n) (n=1 to k) comprised of “k” sets of cutting line direction positions (x.sub.n) of equal intervals and displacements (y.sub.n) of the upper blade along the direction of movement of the punch corresponding to the x.sub.n.Math.y.sub.n is a displacement which is smallest at the position first penetrating the workpiece and becomes larger in value the further away. The position in the direction of movement of the punch where y.sub.n=0 may be freely set.

[0074] Next, a first-order difference quotient J1.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−y.sub.n)/Δx is found for the point cloud (x.sub.n, y.sub.n) (n=2 to k−1).

[0075] If an absolute value |J1.sub.n| of the first-order difference quotient J1.sub.n is larger than a predetermined threshold value δ.sub.1 for judgment of a horizontal part, it will be understood that the upper blade between the n-th to n+1-th point of the point cloud is inclined. The threshold value δ.sub.1 can for example be made 0.1. Next, a second order difference quotient J2.sub.n=(y.sub.n+1−2y.sub.n+y.sub.n−1)/(Δx).sup.2 is found. Furthermore, a maximum value J2.sub.max of the second order difference quotient is found. The maximum value J2.sub.max of the second order difference quotient is the maximum value from the second order difference quotients (y.sub.3−2y.sub.2+y.sub.1)/(Δx).sup.2 to (y.sub.k−2y.sub.k−1+y.sub.k−2)/(Δx).sup.2 found by changing the “n” of the point cloud (x, y).

[0076] Next, a type judgment value J3.sub.n=J2.sub.n/|J2.sub.max| is found. When an absolute value of J3.sub.n is larger than a threshold value δ.sub.2 for judgment of a type, the n-th point corresponds to the position where the shape of the upper blade changes. The threshold value δ.sub.2 is a value not more than 1 and can be freely set in accordance with need. For example, δ.sub.2=0.5 may be set.

[0077] At this time, if the sign of J3.sub.n is negative, the inclined part is a shape inclined downward with respect to the horizontal part (direction close to workpiece) while if the sign of J3.sub.n is positive, the inclined part is a shape inclined upward with respect to the horizontal part (direction far from workpiece). That is, it is possible to judge the direction of inclination of the inclined part from the sign of J3.sub.n.

[0078] As explained above, the shape used in the present invention is the shape of TYPE-A such as in FIG. 5(a). That is, if, at one or both of the boundary of the second inclined part and the first inclined part and the boundary of the second inclined part and third inclined part, the absolute value of J3.sub.n is a predetermined threshold value δ.sub.2 or more and J3.sub.n is positive, it is necessary to adjust the shear angle of the upper blade

[0079] If illustrating a flow chart of this judgment, the result becomes like in FIG. 11. The shape of the punch is judged by making a computer etc. run a program for judging the shape of the upper blade for performing such processing. Specific examples of this judgment are shown in FIGS. 12 to 16.

[0080] FIG. 12(a) shows the punch shape (x, y) and J1.sub.n, while (b) shows the punch shape (x, y) and J3.sub.n. In this example, at the two ends of the horizontal part (|J|.sub.n|<δ.sub.1), there are points where the absolute value of J3.sub.n is larger than δ.sub.2 and the sign of J3.sub.n is negative (|J3.sub.n|<δ.sub.2, J3.sub.n<0). In this case, the shape of the punch is judged to be TYPE-A.

[0081] In the examples of FIGS. 13 and 14, at one end of the horizontal part (|J1.sub.n|<δ.sub.1), there is a point where the absolute value of J3.sub.n is larger than δ.sub.2 and the sign of J3.sub.n is negative (|J3.sub.n|<δ.sub.2, J3.sub.n<0), while at the other end, there is a point where the absolute value of J3.sub.n is larger than δ.sub.2 and the sign of J3.sub.n is positive (|J2.sub.n|<δ.sub.2, J3.sub.n>0). In this case, the shape of the punch is judged to be TYPE-B.

[0082] In the example of FIG. 15, at the two ends of the horizontal part (|J1.sub.n|<δ.sub.1), there are points where the absolute value of J3.sub.n is larger than δ.sub.2 and the sign of J3.sub.n is positive (|J3.sub.n|<δ.sub.2, J3.sub.n>0). In this case, the shape of the punch is judged to be TYPE-C.

[0083] The example of FIG. 16 is a mixed pattern of TYPE-A, TYPE-B, and TYPE-C. If the punch is such a shape, it may be considered to use the pattern so that the shapes of TYPE-B and TYPE-C do not face the scheduled stretch flange part where the end face properties of the punched surface most become a problem, but it is preferable to not use this considering the stability of the processing.

[0084] In the method of judgment of the present invention, the value of J3.sub.n is stable with respect to changes of the value of Δx. The absolute values of J1.sub.n and J2.sub.n do not have to be high precision. That is, in the judgment of the shape of the punch by the present algorithm, close examination of Ax and study of the effects on J1.sub.n and J2.sub.n in advance are not necessary. It is possible to easily judge the shape of the punch without considering measurement precision.

[0085] Note that, a punch judged to be TYPE-B or TYPE-C cannot be used as is, but if working the upper blade to rectify the shear angle and adjusting it to obtain the shape of TYPE-A, it is possible to use it in the same way as a punch judged to be TYPE-A. The upper blade after being worked is judged for shape again using the above method of judgment.

[0086] The constituent elements of the punching and shearing device with shear angle 15 used in the present invention will be explained next.

[0087] As shown in FIG. 4, the punching and shearing device with shear angle 15 is provided with at least a punch 2, die 3, and holder 9. The punch 2 is provided with an upper blade 10 at its bottom surface. This upper blade 10 has a first inclined part 12a, second inclined part 11, and third inclined part 12b in the width direction. In FIG. 4, the second inclined part is parallel to the cutting line direction.

[0088] The first inclined part 12a and the third inclined part 12b function as so-called “shear angle” parts. In the present invention, the shapes of the first inclined part 12a and third inclined part 12b are as explained above. A shape such as shown in FIG. 5(a) where the two ends (first inclined part and third inclined part) first penetrate the workpiece and finally the center part (second inclined part) penetrates it can be used. Shapes such as shown in (b) and (c) are not used. The punch 2 is configured to be able to operate toward the direction P shown in FIG. 4.

[0089] In the die 3, the end part positioned in the longitudinal direction of the top surface functions as a lower blade 3a. Above this lower blade 3a, the upper blade 10 of the punch 2 is positioned. The shapes of the side surface 2b at the bottom end side of the punch 2 and the side surface 3b at the top end side of the die 3 correspond to each other. Between these side surface 2b and side surface 3b, any clearance may be provided. This lower blade 3a may be configured to enable cutting of an open cross-section so as to enable blanking and may be configured to enable cutting of a closed cross-section to enable punching.

[0090] The workpiece 1 is placed on the top surface of the die 3. The thus placed workpiece 1 becomes gripped between the top surface of the die 3 and the bottom surface of the holder 9.

[0091] Regarding the second inclined part 11 of the upper blade 10, the above-mentioned second inclined part 11 of the punch 2 is preferably arranged at part of the workpiece 1, that is, part or all of the scheduled stretch flange part 22 where the end face properties of the punched surface 8 become the most problematic.

[0092] Next, the process of punching the workpiece 1 using the punching and shearing device with shear angle 15 comprised of such a constitution will be explained.

[0093] First, as shown in FIG. 4, the workpiece 1 is placed on the die 3, then the workpiece 1 is gripped between the top surface of the die 3 and the bottom surface of the holder 9. After that, the punch 2 having the upper blade 10 is pushed downward as shown by the direction P from above the workpiece 1. After that, a shear force acts on the workpiece 1 due to it being sandwiched between the lower blade 3a and the upper blade 10 whereby the workpiece 1 is cut and is punched to a predetermined shape.

[0094] Here, the first inclined part 12a and the third inclined part 12b are inclined in the width direction, so at the time of punching, a punching load is locally applied to the workpiece 1 to cut the workpiece 1. Since a punching load is locally applied, the required punching load can be decreased and further the noise can be reduced compared with a punch 2 with a flat bottom surface and using a flat blade.

[0095] As opposed to this, the second inclined part 11 does not locally apply a punching load like the first inclined part 12a and the third inclined part 12b, but the punched surface 8 punched by the small inclination second inclined part 11 is resistant to flexing in the width direction, so the punched surface 8 becomes uniform and the stretch-flangeability is improved. Further, the workpiece 1 is punched by the first inclined part 12a and the third inclined part 12b over a certain extent of range before being punched by the second inclined part 11, so the range which is punched by the second inclined part 11 becomes smaller compared with the punch 2 where the entire bottom surface is flat and as a result, the punching load required can be decreased and the noise can be reduced even when punching by the second inclined part 11.

[0096] That is, the punch 2 applying the present invention is provided with the second inclined part 11 at part of the upper blade 10 and with the first inclined part 12a and third inclined part 12b at the parts excluding the second inclined part 11, whereby it becomes possible to decrease the punching load and noise compared with a punch where the entire bottom surface is flat and while further making the punched surface uniform and improving the stretch-flangeability.

[0097] The length L1 of the upper blade 10 in the width direction of the second inclined part 11 (cutting line direction) is preferably made 10 to 60% of the length L2 in the width direction of the workpiece 1, more preferably 20 to 50%, still more preferably 30 to 40%.

[0098] If the length L1 of the second inclined part 11 is shorter than 10% of the length L2 of the workpiece 1 in the width direction, due to the first inclined part 12a and the third inclined part 12b around the second inclined part 11, the workpiece 1 will more easily flex in the width direction, the unevenness and work hardening of the punched surface 8 will increase, and the effect of the present invention of improvement of the stretch-flangeability will become harder to obtain.

[0099] If the length L1 of the second inclined part 11 is greater than 60% of the length L2 of the workpiece 1 in the width direction, since stretch flanging occurs due to the concentration of strain in the width direction (cutting line direction), the effect of the present invention of improvement of the stretch-flangeability will become harder to obtain.

[0100] However, these values may fluctuate depending on the working conditions or the material of the workpiece 1. The effects of the present invention cannot necessarily be obtained in all cases if over this range.

[0101] If the absolute values θ.sub.1, θ.sub.3 of the angles of the first inclined part 12a and the third inclined part 12b of the upper blade 10 in the width direction applying the present invention are in the range of 0.5 to 5.0°, there is almost no effect on the amount of work hardening or unevenness of the fracture surface at the part punched by the second inclined part 11.

[0102] If the absolute values θ.sub.1, θ.sub.3 of the angles of the first inclined part 12a and the third inclined part 12b become more than 5.0°, the effects of lightening the press load and reducing noise become greater, but the punched surface 8 of the part punched by the inclined blade 10 becomes worse in fracture surface properties (work hardening and unevenness of fracture surface). Therefore, it is preferable to make the absolute values θ.sub.1, θ.sub.3 of the angles of the first inclined part 12a and third inclined part 12b 0.5 to 5.0°. Further, θ.sub.1 and θ.sub.3 may differ if within the above range.

[0103] In the present invention, the metal sheet forming the workpiece is not particularly limited. A metal sheet made of iron, aluminum, titanium, magnesium and their alloys etc. can be punched. The sheet thickness is also not particularly limited, but the invention is suitable for working 0.5 to 4.0 mm metal sheet. Further, edge cracking in the stretch flanging easily occurs when press-forming high strength steel sheet to obtain press-formed parts, so the invention is particularly effective for working steel sheet with a tensile strength of 590 MPa or more.

[0104] The blank obtained by the above method has a sheared end face 31 such as in FIG. 17. The sheared end face includes a sheared surface 32 and a secondary sheared surface 33. The secondary sheared surface 33 sometimes becomes a shape split like in (a) and sometimes becomes a shape continuous like in (b).

[0105] At the sheared end face 31, if the area ratio of the secondary sheared surface 33 of the entire range of the sheared end face 31 is A2 and the center value of the radius of curvature of the entire range of the blank line when viewed from the top is R, there is a region A of a width of 5 mm surrounded by the two vertical lines drawn in the thickness direction in the sheared end face 31 where the area ratio of the secondary sheared surface 33 at that region A is A2/2 or less and radius of curvature of the region A when viewed from the top is ½ or less of R. Here, the radius of curvature of the blank line when viewed from the top is made one found for every 1 mm from the end of the blank line. The radius of curvature in the case where the blank line is straight is ∞. The region A in the figure is for explaining the range of the region A.

[0106] If there is a secondary sheared surface 33 present at the sheared end face 31 of the blank, the stretch-flangeability of the blank will easily fall. If the ratio of the secondary sheared surface 33 is large, the drop will become remarkable. If the ratio of the secondary sheared surface 33 at a region with a small radius of curvature of the blank line, that is, a location where deformation concentrates, becomes lower, the stretch-flangeability can be kept from dropping.

[0107] Further, the area ratio of the sheared surface 32 at the region A is preferably not more than 80% of the area ratio of the sheared end face 31 other than the region A, more preferably not more than 70%, still more preferably not more than 60%.

[0108] Further, if the ratio of the sheared surface 32 is uneven as well, the stretch-flangeability easily drops, so the change in the area ratio of the sheared surface 32 in the sheet width direction of the region A is preferably within ±20%. The change in the area ratio of the sheared surface 32 in the sheet width direction of the region A is obtained by finding the area ratio of the sheared surface 32 for each 1 mm from the end of the region A and finding the change of the same. The change of the sheared surface 32 is more preferably within ±15%, still more preferably within ±10%.

[0109] The larger such a width of the region A, the more preferable. It is more preferable to satisfy the above condition by a width of 7 mm and still more preferable to satisfy the above condition by a width of 10 mm.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

[0110] 1 workpiece [0111] 2 punch [0112] 3 die [0113] 3a lower blade [0114] 4 shear droop [0115] 5 shear surface [0116] 6 fracture surface [0117] 7 burr [0118] 8 punched surface [0119] 9 holder [0120] 10 upper blade [0121] 11 second inclined part [0122] 12a first inclined part [0123] 12b third inclined part [0124] 15 punching and shearing device [0125] 21 stretch flange part [0126] 22 scheduled stretch flange part [0127] 31 sheared end face [0128] 32 sheared surface [0129] 33 secondary sheared surface