Conductor

Abstract

An aluminium based conductor made of an alloy has at least 98 wt % aluminium, from 0.25 to 0.45 wt % iron, from 0.07 to 0.25 wt % copper and from 0.001 to 0.10 wt % boron, having high strength and conductivity. The present arrangement also includes a method for obtaining such conductors.

Claims

1. An aluminium based conductor made of an alloy comprising: at least 98 wt % aluminium, from 0.25 to 0.45 wt % iron, from 0.07 to 0.25 wt % copper and from 0.001 to 0.10 wt % boron.

2. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises from 0.30 to 0.35 wt % iron, preferably 0.31-0.32 wt % iron.

3. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises from 0.15 to 0.20 wt % copper, preferably 0.16-0.18 wt % copper.

4. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises 0.001 to 0.04 wt % boron.

5. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises up to 0.50 wt % total of other elements, selected from a group consisting of Mn, Cr, Ni, Bi, Ga, V, Ti, Zn, Si and Mg, each element being present in an amount of less than 0.20 wt %.

6. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises at least 99 wt % aluminium.

7. The conductor according to claim 1, with an average grain size in the longitudinal direction (length) superior to 3 μm and an average grain size in the transversal direction (width) inferior to 2 μm.

8. The conductor according to claim 1, with an average elongation ratio of the grain of more than 1.2, preferably of more than 1.5, most preferably of more than 2.

9. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein the aluminium based conductor is obtained by a process comprising the steps of: a. providing the alloy in a molten form; b. rod casting the alloy yielding a rod; and c. drawing the rod to a conductor having a desired final geometry.

10. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein said conductor has an ultimate tensile strength of at least 180 MPa measured according to ISO 6892-1.

11. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein said conductor has a conductivity of more than 59% IACS, measured according to IEC 60468.

12. The conductor according to claim 1, wherein said conductor has an elongation at break of >2.0% measured according to ISO 6892-1.

13. A subsea cable comprising: the conductor according to claim 1.

14. The subsea cable according to claim 13, where the subsea cable is an armorless subsea cable.

15. A method for producing a conductor including the steps of: a. providing an alloy comprising 0.25 to 0.45 wt % iron, from 0.07 to 0.25 wt % copper and from 0.001 to 0.10 wt % boron, and at least 98% aluminium in a molten form; b. rod casting said composition yielding a rod; and c. drawing the rod to a conductor having a desired final geometry.

Description

SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0044] The present invention is described in detail by reference to the following drawings:

[0045] FIG. 1a is an Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) scan of an embodiment of the invention.

[0046] FIG. 1b is a light optical image of a microstructure of an exemplary conductor according to the invention.

[0047] FIG. 2 is a graph representing the conductivity of different conductors as a function of their ultimate tensile strength.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0048] The present invention provides an improved conductor useful in building and communication wire applications, especially in subsea power cable applications, especially in armorless subsea cable applications.

[0049] The conductor of this invention is an Aluminium-conductor (Al-conductor) and is made of an alloy comprising from 0.25 to 0.45 wt % iron, from 0.07 to 0.25 wt % copper and from 0.001 to 0.10 wt % boron, and at least 98 wt %, at least 99 wt %, at least 99.2 wt % or at least 99.4 wt % aluminium.

[0050] Preferably the conductor is made of an alloy comprising from 0.30 to 0.35 wt % iron, more preferably 0.31-0.32 wt % iron. Preferably the conductor is made of an alloy comprising from 0.15 to 0.20 wt % copper, more preferably 0.16-0.18 wt % copper. Preferably the conductor can be made of an alloy comprising 0.001 to 0.04 wt % boron

[0051] In exemplary embodiments of the conductor according to the invention the alloy may comprise less than 0.05 wt % zinc, less than 0.2 wt % silicon, less than 0.1 wt % magnesium and other elements that together sum up to less than 0.15 wt %. Preferably the conductor according to the invention may advantageously be made of an alloy also comprising less than 0.05 wt % zinc, less than 0.1 wt % silicon, less than 0.05 wt % magnesium and other elements that together sum up to less than 0.1 wt %. An exemplary Al-conductor according to the invention may advantageously be made of an alloy also comprising 0.0036 wt % silicon, 0.002 wt % magnesium.

[0052] Other elements refer to additional elements that may be added to the alloy selected from a group consisting of Mn, Cr, Ni, Bi, Ga, V, Ti, Zn, Si, P, Sn, S, Be, Co, Zr, Pb, Na, Sr, Li, Cd and Mg etc. to improve for example the strength, the thermal stability of the conductor, etc, or undesirable but unavoidable impurities.

[0053] An improved grain structure, as shown in FIG. 2 is obtained when the Al-conductor is prepared by a process route involving casting, rolling and drawing. The process route comprises the steps of: [0054] Providing the above described alloy in a molten (liquid) form [0055] Rod casting said alloy yielding a rod. Rod casting entails inline rolling to a desired rod dimension. [0056] The yielding rod may preferably have an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) between 115 and 180 MPa, preferably 138-160 MPa. These conditions shall also at minimum may preferably yield a conductivity of 60.5% IACS, preferably >60.7% IACS. [0057] This rod must then be reduced in cross-section area to a certain range in order to a achieve the desired properties. This depends on the strength of this rod. Such a process is well known to the person skilled in the art. Accordingly, the rod is drawn to a desired final geometry, yielding the conductor eventually followed by stranding to the final conductor design. The conductor will now consist of material with minimum 180 MPa UTS and a minimum conductivity of 59% IACS.

[0058] Conductivity measured according to IEC 60468.

[0059] Tensile strength & elongation to fracture measured according to ISO 6892-1.

[0060] Table 1 to 4 present materials that are known in the art and their properties.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Properties of rod/drawing stock according to EN 1715-2. Rm. Conductivity (min-max) (Min.) Material [MPa] [% IACS] AW1370 H0  60-80 61.9 AW1370 H14 115-130 61.5 AW8030 H24 100-150 60.2 AW8176 H24 100-150 60.2

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Chemical composition of AW-8xxx series according to EN 1715. 2 Si Fe Cu Al (min.) AW8030 0.1 0.3-0.8 0.15-0.30 98.55 AW8176 0.03-0.15 0.4-1.0 —

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Properties of drawn and heat-treated AW-6101/6201 according to EN 1715, according to EN 50183 Rm. (min.) Conductivity [MPa] (Nom.) [% IACS] AL4 315 52.9 AL5 295 55.25 AL7 255 57.5

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Properties of drawn AW 8030 & 8176 according to EN 1715-2, according to ASTM B800-05 Conductivity Temper Rm. [MPa] (Min.) [% IACS] 0  59-110 60.6 H1x or H2x 103-152

[0061] The following examples are all based on an Al-conductors comprising from 0.25 to 0.45 wt % iron, from 0.07 to 0.25 wt % copper, from 0.001 to 0.10 wt % boron, less than 0.05 wt % zinc, less than 0.2 wt % silicon, less than 0.1 wt % magnesium, other elements that together sum up to less than 0.1 wt %, and at least 98% aluminium.

[0062] A conductor is considered to have a sufficient elongation at break if the elongation at break is >1.8%, preferably >2%, most preferably >3%.

[0063] The average elongation ratio is equal to the average longitudinal size (or length) divided by the average transversal size (or width).

Example 1

[0064] Rod [0065] Ø09.5 mm/70.9 mm.sup.2 [0066] UTS [Mpa]=180 [0067] The alloy comprises 0.31 wt % Fe, 0.035 wt % Si, 0.18 wt % Cu, 0.002 wt % B, 0.002 wt % Mg, 0.006 wt % Ti and 99.4 wt % Al [0068] The rod is reduced to a shaped profile with area of 15.9 mm.sup.2 by cold drawing. This corresponds to 78% cross section reduction relative to the original rod. The final wire has the following properties: [0069] UTS: 262 Mpa [0070] Conductivity: 59.2% IACS [0071] Elongation at break: >2.9% (Sufficient for conductors) [0072] The microstructure of the conductor obtained in this example is shown in FIG. 1a and measured by the line intercept method: [0073] Average grain size in transversal direction: 1.406 μm (+0.091 μm/−0.081 μm) [0074] Average grain size in longitudinal (drawing) direction: 3.419 μm (+3.48 μm/−1.47 μm) [0075] Average elongation ratio>2 [0076] Light optical image of microstructure shows finely dispersed iron particles (black), in the aluminium alloy (white) as shown in FIG. 1b.

Example 2

[0077] Rod [0078] Ø9.5 mm/70.9 mm.sup.2 [0079] UTS [Mpa]=180 [0080] The alloy comprises 0.31 wt % Fe, 0.035 wt % Si, 0.18 wt % Cu, 0.002 wt % B, 0.002 wt % Mg, 0.006 wt % Ti and 99.4 wt % Al [0081] The rod is reduced to a shaped profile with area of 27.1 mm.sup.2 by cold drawing. This corresponds to 62% cross section reduction relative to the original rod. The final wire has the following properties: [0082] UTS: 210 Mpa [0083] Conductivity: 59.2% IACS [0084] Elongation at break: >2.2% (Sufficient for conductors)

Example 3

[0085] Rod [0086] Ø9.5 mm/70.9 mm.sup.2 [0087] UTS [Mpa]=150 [0088] The alloy comprises 0.32 wt % Fe, 0.036 wt % Si, 0.17 wt % Cu, 0.004 wt % B, 0.002 wt % Mg, 0.006 wt % Ti and 99.4 wt % Al [0089] The rod is reduced to a shaped profile with area of 21.0 mm.sup.2 by cold drawing. This corresponds to 67% cross section reduction relative to the original rod. The final wire has the following properties: [0090] UTS: 223 Mpa [0091] Conductivity: 59.45% IACS [0092] Elongation at break: >3.4% (Sufficient for conductors)

Example 4

[0093] Rod [0094] Ø9.5 mm/70.9 mm.sup.2 [0095] UTS [Mpa]=150 [0096] The alloy comprises 0.32 wt % Fe, 0.036 wt % Si, 0.17 wt % Cu, 0.004 wt % B, 0.002 wt % Mg, 0.006 wt % Ti and 99.4 wt % Al [0097] The rod is reduced to a shaped profile with area of 13.4 mm.sup.2 by cold drawing. This corresponds to 82% cross section reduction relative to the original rod. The final wire has the following properties: [0098] UTS: 235 Mpa [0099] Conductivity: 59.54% IACS [0100] Elongation at break: >3.1% (Sufficient for conductors)

[0101] Said composition yield a finely tuned microstructure (FIGS. 1a and 1b) which gives the final material a surprisingly beneficial set of properties, especially when using the manufacturing route described above. In addition to the favorable combination of strength and conductivity, the material has superb fatigue and creep properties, discussed later. This is crucial for successful installation of subsea cables at large water depths, relative to the amount of steel armoring. i.e. the prescribed solution is particularly advantageous for armorless subsea cables.

[0102] The following table presents the measured tensile strength at rupture in thread (Rm), conductivity and elongation at break of known pre-existing solutions and of the new material (illustrated in examples 1-4):

TABLE-US-00005 Rm. Conductivity Elongation (min-max) (Min.) at break Material [MPa] [% IACS] [%] AW1370 H0  60-80 61.9 >40 AW1370 H14 115-130 61.5 >14 AW8030/AW 103-152 60.2-60.6 >10 8176 H1X or H2X AL5 295 55.25 >3.5 AL7 255 57.5 >3.0 Example 1 262 59.2 >2.9 Example 2 210 59.2 >2.2 Example 3 223 59.5 >3.4 Example 4 235 59.4 >3.1

[0103] These data can be seen in FIG. 2, and show why the current invention (through its examples) is advantageous.

[0104] Ultimate tensile strength can be used to make preliminary assessment of the material mechanical strength. For example, typical AW 1350/1370 aluminium is much softer than the other materials and cannot sustain similar mechanical loads. Rm is often used to characterize material strength but does not relate directly to the mechanical limits of a subsea cable conductor. The onset of yielding—i.e. plastic deformation of the material happen prior to the ultimate tensile strength is reached. This is necessary when comparing the higher strength materials such as 8000 and 6000 aluminium series. Subsea cables are also subjected to various prolonged tension or cyclic loading such as under installation or offshore jointing. It is expected that prolonged or cyclic loading will cause cable failure below both the material yield limit and ultimate tensile strength.

[0105] It is hence important to characterize the creep and fatigue strength of the materials. In subsea cables, fatigue and creep always co-occur. One way to characterize their combined effect is fatigue testing at elevated mean stress and/or varying test frequency where increased mean stress and/or reduced test frequency increases the amount of creep per cycle. In the following fatigue testing of AW 6201 in T6 condition similar to AL5 conditions is compared with Example 1:

TABLE-US-00006 Testing Stress Fatigue life mean stress amplitude Example 6201 T6 Estimated on the basis of the [MPa] [MPa] 1 literature (see in the paragraph below) 110 90 156,413 214,545 110 90 173,149 130 67 771,688 436,476 130 67 524,000

[0106] It is important to notice that these fatigue tests were done at 1 Hz instead of 10 Hz (as in “Fatigue-Creep in conductors and armoring as constraint for allowable installation depth”, 10.sup.th international conference on Insulated Power cables, 2019, Johanson et al.). Reducing the frequency gives more time for creep damage. Considering that the fatigue life to failure was still approximately the same or even better signify the improved fatigue-creep life of the example 1 composition and condition. This is particularly impressive when assessing the Rm and conductivity levels. The Rm value for the 6201 alloy was 37% higher while the conductivity was almost 7% lower.

[0107] The fatigue-creep properties are best described by fatigue testing at high mean stress relative to the material yield limit as this best investigates the mechanical properties required for having the cable sustain prolonged hang-off from an installation chute at large water depth which is experienced during installation and potential offshore splicing.

[0108] This improvement is due to the beneficial effect of iron and copper additions (in the amount specified in the current invention) on the drawing properties leading to the highly beneficial microstructure depictured in FIG. 1.

[0109] The conductor possesses other advantageous properties. Compared to a standard conductor, AA1370, the subject of this invention has an allowable strain is improved by 80-100%, stiffness by 100-110% and the maximal tension of the conductor is improved by 400-450%. Increased allowable strain of the conductor and conductor tension can significantly increase allowable installation depth for subsea power cables.

[0110] When used in a cable, the conductor increases the maximal cable tension by over 100%. High strength and low weight of the conductor reduces or removes the need for additional axial load carrying elements. This potentially enables armorless designs for installation at more than 1000 m water depth. Low depth challenges cannot be solved by currently available technology.

[0111] Furthermore, these conductors can be used to produce subsea cables with less armoring, which can significantly reduce cable costs.

[0112] These conductors can also be used in dynamic subsea power cables.

[0113] Such conductors allow to reduce cost of subsea cables by introducing a high strength conductor without compromising its conductivity, and the production process remains simple.