SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INCREASING SOCIAL PHONE CALLS BETWEEN THE YOUNG AND ELDERLY
20220222697 · 2022-07-14
Inventors
Cpc classification
G06Q30/0208
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
The invention allows people to impose their will on how their friends/family members socialize with one another. Incentives can vary from cash to simply challenging one party to do the right thing. For example, a middle-aged mother wants her daughter to call her grandmother more often. The invention provides a new way the mother can request, incentivize, and validate the phone calls her daughter makes to her grandmother.
Claims
1-11. (canceled)
12. A computer-implemented method to incentivize socializing communication comprising: receiving a set of rules for implementation by a party B regarding said communication of said party B with a party C; receiving a definition of reward given to said Party B, subject to implementation of said rules by said party B; and validating compliance in implementing said rules by said party B.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said validation is conditional on approval of said rules by said party B.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein said rules received from a party A.
15. The method of claim 12, comprising notifying said party A regarding said compliance or non-compliance.
16. The method of claim 12, wherein said set of rules comprises minimal communication duration.
17. The method of claim 12, wherein said validating being performed by Artificial Intelligence (AI) analyzing content of said communication.
18. The method of claim 12, wherein said validating comprises utilizing voice recognition to validate the identity of said party B.
19. The method of claim 12, wherein said validating comprises utilizing voice recognition to validate the identity of said party C.
20. The method of claim 12, wherein said reward is a payment.
21. The method of claim 12, wherein said set of rules comprises minimal communication duration.
22. The method of claim 12, wherein said set of rules comprises a permissible time period between said communications.
23. The method of claim 14, comprising verifying that said party B is a family member of at least one of said party A and said party B.
24. The method of claim 23 wherein said verifying selected from the group consisting of voice recognition, user information of said party A, user information of said party B, user information of said party C, and combinations thereof.
25. A computerized apparatus having a processor, said processor being adapted to perform the steps of: receiving a set of rules for implementation by a party B regarding said communication of party said B with a party C; receiving a definition of reward given to said Party B, subject to implementation of said rules by said party B; and validating compliance in implementing said rules by party said B.
26. The apparatus of claim 25 wherein said rules received from a party A.
27. The apparatus of claim 26, comprising verifying that said party B is a family member of at least one of said party A and said party B.
28. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein said verifying selected from the group consisting of voice recognition, user information of said party A, user information of said party B, user information of said party C, and combinations thereof.
29. A computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium retaining program instructions, which program instructions when read by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method comprising: receiving a set of rules for implementation by a party B regarding said communication of said party B with a party C; receiving a definition of reward given to said Party B, subject to implementation of said rules by said party B; validating compliance in implementing said rules by said party B.
30. The product of claim 28 wherein said rules received from a party A.
31. The apparatus of claim 29, comprising verifying that said party B is a family member of at least one of said party A and said party B.
Description
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0019] There are many embodiments of the invention. Party B may be requested to call Party C in accordance with a specific time period such as hourly, daily, weekly or monthly. For example, Party A may request Party B call Party C each month for the next six months. The computer application/internet website may require a time period to elapse between the calls made between Party B and Party C in order to collect an additional benefit/payment from Party A.
[0020] Party A may request that both Party B and Party C communicate with each other in a specific way. Other types of requests could involve Party B advising Party C on a number of different topics. Party A may want to teach Party C something through Party B.
[0021] Technology can be used to authenticate if Party B communicated with Party C in the manner that Party A prescribed or vice versa. Multiple tools could be used to validate communications between Party B and Party C such as monitoring, voice recognition software, and artificial intelligence. This assures Party A whether the discipline imposed on Party B actually occurred. A minimum time between each communication between Party A and Party B call may be imposed by Party A in order for Party B to be compensated. Essentially, Party A manufactures rules of conduct that Party B must abide by in their communications with Party C. Such conditions can be imposed on Party B in order to receive payment from Party A.
[0022] During each call, voice recognition software could be used to validate the parties on the call and track the time both parties engaged on the call. Artificial intelligence listening in on the conversations could validate whether the types of discussions that take place are permissible in accordance with Party A's guidelines.
[0023] The computer application/internet site could have a selection of disciplines/tasks that Party A can request that Party B conduct with Party C; essentially, a script that Party A wants Party B to use when communicating with Party C. The mode of communication may also differ between Party B and Party C. Video, text, or email could be used as a mode of communication between Party B and Party C rather than voice only.
[0024] Simultaneously, Party A may request Party B and Party C to communicate with each other in a specific way over an extended period of time to achieve a specific purpose. For example, Party A, acting in the role of a matchmaker, wants Party B and Party C to get together as a couple. Party A requests that Party B and Party C talk daily on the phone for one hour and each of them will get a $50 Amazon gift card for each call made. This way, Party A is able to incentivize Party B and Party C to socially develop a relationship between each other—which results in using the said invention to impose the will of Party A onto Party B and Party C.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0025]
[0029]
[0042]