TRANSITIONS FOR JOINING CRASH IMPACT ATTENUATOR SYSTEMS TO FIXED STRUCTURES

Abstract

A transition system for connecting a crash attenuator to a roadside fixed structure, such as a concrete traffic barrier, includes a plate adapted to securely attach to a desired location on the fixed structure, the plate having a flat surface adapted to correspond to a flat surface on the fixed structure, and being reinforced by a plurality of backing ribs for strength.

Claims

1. A transition system adapted for securing a roadside safety system to a fixed structure, the transition system comprising: a plate having a forward end and a rearward end, as well as a front face and a rear face; and a transition mount adapted to secure a rearward end of the roadside safety system to the forward end of the plate, the plate comprising a flat surface which is configured to be conformed to a corresponding surface on the fixed structure.

2. The transition system as recited in claim 1, and further comprising a plurality of apertures disposed through the front and rear faces of the plate at its rearward end, the plurality of apertures being adapted to receive mechanical fasteners for securing the plate to the corresponding surface on the fixed structure.

3. The transition system as recited in claim 1, wherein the plate includes a taper from a location partially along a length of the plate and extending at an angle rearwardly to the rearward end of the plate.

4. The transition system as recited in claim 3, wherein the location partially along the length of the plate is about midway along a distance between the forward end of the plate and the rearward end of the plate.

5. The transition system as recited in claim 3, wherein the plate comprises a first width at its forward end and a second width at its rearward end, the second width being smaller than the first width.

6. The transition system as recited in claim 5, wherein the width of the plate narrows gradually from the first width at the location partially along the length of the plate to the second width at the rearward end of the plate because of the taper.

7. The transition system as recited in claim 6, wherein the corresponding surface on the fixed structure is also flat, so that the plate flat surface is adapted to lie in a flush manner on the corresponding flat surface on the fixed structure.

8. The transition system as recited in claim 7, wherein the second width at the rearward end of the plate is adapted to correspond in size to a width of the corresponding flat surface on the fixed structure.

9. The transition system as recited in claim 8, wherein the taper angle is adapted to the length of the transition plate and to a size of the corresponding flat surface on the fixed structure.

10. The transition system as recited in claim 9, wherein the size of the corresponding flat surface on the fixed structure is one or more of its length, width, or area.

11. The transition system as recited in claim 1, wherein the transition mount is secured to the forward end of the plate by either mechanical fasteners or by one or more welds.

12. The transition system as recited in claim 1, and further comprising a plurality of reinforcement ribs disposed in spaced relation to one another on the rear face of the plate.

13. A transition system adapted for securing a roadside safety system to a fixed structure, the transition system comprising: a plate having a forward end and extending along a length to a rearward end, as well as a front face and a rear face; a transition mount adapted to secure a rearward end of the roadside safety system to the forward end of the plate; and a plurality of reinforcement ribs disposed in spaced relation to one another on the rear face of the plate.

14. The transition system as recited in claim 13, wherein each of the plurality of reinforcement ribs is disposed along the length of the plate, each of the plurality of reinforcement ribs having a length.

15. The transition system as recited in claim 14, wherein the lengths of at least two of the plurality of reinforcement ribs are different from one another.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] FIG. 1 is an isometric view of an exemplary embodiment of a crash attenuator and transition structure constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention, taken from a forward perspective, looking rearward;

[0016] FIG. 2 is an isometric view similar to FIG. 1, taken from a rearward perspective, looking forward;

[0017] FIG. 3 is an isometric view of an exemplary embodiment of the transition structure of the present invention;

[0018] FIG. 4 is a plan view of the transition structure of FIG. 3;

[0019] FIG. 5 is a top view of the transition structure of FIGS. 3 and 4; and

[0020] FIG. 6 is a plan view of the rear or back face of the transition structure of FIGS. 3-5.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0021] Referring now more particularly to the drawings, there is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 a vehicular crash attenuator 10, which is secured to a fixed abutment or structure 20 by means of a transition plate 30. The transition plate 30 is shown in greater detail in FIGS. 3-6.

[0022] The vehicular crash attenuator 10 may be of any known type in the industry, typically constructed with a nosepiece 12 at a front end thereof, designed to absorb the first impact from an errant vehicle, and a plurality of compressible sections or stages 14 (FIG. 2). The illustrated example is the DELTA CRASH CUSHION® system, sold by the applicant for the present application, TrafFix Devices, Inc., of San Clemente, Calif., and herein expressly incorporated by reference, but other available crash attenuation systems, available from competitors in the roadside safety marketplace, may also be used.

[0023] The transition plate 30 is constructed to be conformed to or compatible with the surface of the fixed structure to which it is to be attached, so that the plate lies in a flush manner on that surface when attached. Thus, in the illustrated embodiment, the transition place 30 is substantially flat in configuration, as opposed to prior art transition plates which are typically of a thrie-beam construction. The term “substantially flat” means that it is designed to be flat, and is manufactured to that design, within certain reasonable tolerances. Henceforth, and throughout the claims, the term “flat” will be used, but it is to be understood to mean “substantially flat” to allow for the tolerances typical in all manufacturing operations. The transition plate, as shown, is designed with a taper and shape to mimic the concrete barrier, in this case a barrier commonly identified in the industry as a “Jersey Barrier” to which it is adapted to be attached. However, the type of fixed structure is not important to the invention—any such structure or object having an available flat surface to which the rearward end of the plate can be attached is potentially usable with the inventive transition system.

[0024] More particularly, the plate 30 includes a taper 32 from a location 34 partially (about midway) along a length of the plate 30 and extending rearwardly to a rearward end 36 of the plate 30. Thus, the plate 30 comprises a first width at its forward end, and a second smaller width at its rearward end 36, the width of the plate narrowing gradually from the first width to the second smaller width along the taper 32.

[0025] Bolt holes 40 are disposed in the rearward end 36 of the plate 30 for securing the plate 30 to the fixed structure 20, extending through a front face 41a of the plate and a rear face 41b of the plate. Note that the taper 32 may be adapted to narrow the plate 30 so that at its rearward end 36, it is sized so that its width corresponds to the width of an available flat surface 42 on the fixed structure 20, and the rearward end 36 of the plate 30 may thus be readily secured to the available flat surface 42 using bolts disposed through the bolt holes 40. Thus, the angle of the taper is adaptable to the length of the transition plate and the size (length, width, and/or area) of the available flat surface 42 on the structure 20, so that no matter the type of structure to which the transition is to be secured, that securement should be easily attained.

[0026] Transition mount 44 is adapted to secure the rearward end of the crash attenuator 10 to the transition plate 30. Fastening of the transition mount 44 may be attained by using mechanical fasteners, but may also be by welding.

[0027] Shims 46, illustrated as being of wood, may be inserted between the plate 30 and the fixed structure 20 in locations where there is a gap between the plate 30 and the structure 20, to fixedly secure the plate to the structure between the transition mount 44 and the fasteners at the rearward end 36 of the plate.

[0028] A plurality of ribs 48 may be advantageously secured to the rear face 41b of the transition plate 30 (FIG. 6) to reinforce the plate. As illustrated, the plurality of ribs are of differing lengths, extending along the length of the plate and spaced vertically from one another, in order to be adapted to the configuration and taper of the plate. Although the structural ribs 48 may be formed of most any known shape, such as commonly available box tubes, they are advantageously formed using a C-channel structure, with the open side of the C-channel facing the rear plate face 41b. This arrangement is advantageous because it avoids a double thickness of material, thus maximizing cost effectiveness without reducing the strength of the plate.

[0029] In one exemplary embodiment, for illustrative purposes only, the plate 30 is 3/16 inch plate, with a galvanized finish. The rearward end (second) width is 15.3 in., and the front end (first) width is 24.0 inches.

[0030] The innovative transition plate of the present invention has been found to result in successful crash testing under current federal MASH standards. In particular, it has been found to minimize snagging, minimize vehicle floor board deformation, and to maximize re-direction of the impacting vehicle.