METHODS FOR CULTIVATING SPHAGNUM
20220217926 · 2022-07-14
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
The invention provides a method for cultivating Sphagnum that has been applied to a surface of a field, the method comprising controllably irrigating the Sphagnum, wherein the controllably irrigating comprises applying water to a surface of the Sphagnum and/or to the surface of the field. The invention also relates to Sphagnum obtainable by a method of the invention.
Claims
1. A method for cultivating Sphagnum that has been applied to a surface of a field, the method comprising controllably irrigating the Sphagnum, wherein the controllably irrigating comprises one or more of applying water to a surface of the Sphagnum and applying water to the surface of the field.
2. (canceled)
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the controllably irrigating does not comprise saturating the field with water to submerge at least a portion of the Sphagnum with water.
4. (canceled)
5. (canceled)
6. (canceled)
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the field has a water table, and wherein the controllably irrigating does not increase a level of the water table.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the controllably irrigating comprises applying between 3.5 and 35 L of water per m.sup.2 per week.
9. (canceled)
10. (canceled)
11. (canceled)
12. (canceled)
13. (canceled)
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein a weight of water to a dry weight of the Sphagnum are in a ratio of between 5:1 and 60:1.
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein a weight of water to a dry weight of the Sphagnum are in a ratio of between 8:1 and 45:1.
16. The method according to claim 1, wherein a weight of water to a dry weight of the Sphagnum are in a ratio of between 10:1 and 40:1.
17. The method according to claim 1, wherein a weight of water to a dry weight of the Sphagnum are in a ratio of between 12:1 and 35:1.
18. (canceled)
19. (canceled)
20. The method according to claim 1, wherein the controllably irrigating ensures that at least a portion of the surface of the Sphagnum remains in contact with air in order to permit gaseous exchange.
21. (canceled)
22. (canceled)
23. (canceled)
24. The method according to claim 1, wherein the controllably irrigating comprises applying water from above the Sphagnum.
25. The method according to claim 1, wherein the controllably irrigating comprises spray irrigation.
26. The method according to claim 1, wherein the controllably irrigating comprises drip irrigation.
27. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method is carried out for at least 12 hours, 1 day, 1 week or 1 month.
28. The method according to claim 1, further comprising covering the Sphagnum.
29. The method according to claim 28, wherein a mesh cover is applied to the Sphagnum.
30. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the use of a sensor that measures evaporation of the water, wherein an irrigation parameter is altered when the evaporation of the water is sensed.
31. The method according to claim 1, further comprising harvesting the Sphagnum.
32. The method according to claim 31, further comprising providing a growing medium comprising the harvested Sphagnum.
33. (canceled)
34. A method for cultivating Sphagnum that has been applied to a surface of a field, the method comprising controllably irrigating the Sphagnum, and covering the Sphagnum with a cover.
35. (canceled)
36. (canceled)
37. (canceled)
38. (canceled)
39. (canceled)
40. (canceled)
41. (canceled)
42. (canceled)
43. (canceled)
44. A method for cultivating Sphagnum that has been applied to a growth surface, the method comprising controllably irrigating the Sphagnum, wherein the controllably irrigating comprises one or more of applying water to a surface of the Sphagnum and applying water to the growth surface.
45. (canceled)
46. (canceled)
47. (canceled)
48. (canceled)
49. (canceled)
50. (canceled)
51. (canceled)
52. (canceled)
53. (canceled)
54. (canceled)
55. (canceled)
56. (canceled)
57. (canceled)
58. (canceled)
59. (canceled)
60. (canceled)
61. (canceled)
62. (canceled)
63. (canceled)
64. (canceled)
65. (canceled)
66. (canceled)
67. (canceled)
68. (canceled)
69. (canceled)
70. (canceled)
71. (canceled)
72. (canceled)
73. (canceled)
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0123] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the following Figures and Examples.
[0124]
[0125]
[0126]
[0127]
[0128]
[0129]
[0130]
[0131]
[0132]
[0133]
[0134]
[0135]
EXAMPLES
Comparative Example 1
Conventional Methods for Cultivating Sphagnum
[0136] S. Wichmann et al. (2017) Mires and Peat, Vol. 20, Article 03, pp. 1-19, describes a conventional method of Sphagnum farming using paludiculture, which does not employ controllable irrigation according to the present invention. A first trial on a former bog grassland was performed by Wichmann et al. The trial on bog grassland was performed at Rastede (Lower Saxony, NW Germany) and consisted of two phases: (a) preparing the site; and (b) initiating the Sphagnum culture. This involved forming Sphagnum production strips, narrow ditches for irrigation around each production strip, and bunds or banks to be used as causeways. 30-50 cm of the layer of top soil was removed using a tracked excavator. Narrow ditches (approximately 50 cm wide and 50 cm deep) were constructed along with bunds, and pumps and underground pipes for irrigation were installed. The Sphagnum fragments were spread onto the production strips. The ditches were filled with water and the water table was raised immediately. Sphagnum papillosum was the species of Sphagnum used.
[0137] This method provides a high water table which is raised and maintained by the use of ditches and underground pipes. This achieved productivity levels of 3.25 t ha.sup.−1 a.sup.−1 of average annual dry mass harvest, with a bulk density of 30 g L.sup.−1, which corresponds to 108 m.sup.3 ha.sup.−1 a.sup.−1. This has been plotted in
[0138] A second trial using a floating mat system was performed by Wichmann et al. Buoyant mats supporting Sphagnum were floated on a surface of an artificial water body. Floating mats from panels of polystyrene foam (2 cm thick) were wrapped in an absorbent textile (polypropylene fleece) to allow water supply to the Sphagnum from underneath. The Sphagnum fragments were applied to the surface of the mats and covered with a thin straw mat. Sphagnum papillosum was the species of Sphagnum used.
[0139] This method provides water directly below the surface of the Sphagnum by floating on a surface of a body of water. Water is transported to the Sphagnum around the mat by capillary action through the textile. This achieved productivity levels of 6 t ha.sup.−1 a.sup.−1 of average annual dry mass harvest for floating mats. As the bulk density was also 30 g L.sup.−1, this corresponds to 200 m.sup.3 ha.sup.−1 a.sup.1 and is shown in
Example 2
Methods for Cultivating Sphagnum According to the Invention
Materials & Methods
[0140] Sphagnum was cultivated in accordance with a method of the present invention. In more detail, BeadaGel™ (commercially available from BeadaMoss®, UK) was spread at 3 l/m.sup.2 on a peat surface of a field. Four species were used: Sphagnum fallax, Sphagnum palustre, Sphagnum capillifolium, and Sphagnum squarrosum. Water was supplied with overhead (spray) irrigation (applied at 2.6 l/m.sup.2 whenever the surface of the Sphagnum appeared dry). The water contained a nutrient composition comprising Hortifeeds NPK 15-5-15. This gave a final nutrient content comprising: 2.92 mg/L of sodium, 13.17 mg/L of magnesium, 106.50 mg/L of potassium, 36.96 mg/L of calcium, 0.41 mg/L of manganese, 0.09 mg/L of copper, 0.55 mg/L of zinc, 4.30 mg/L of sulfur, 0.19 mg/L of boron, 24.57 mg/L of phosphorus, 0.98 mg/L of iron, 0.05 mg/L of molybdenum, 0.16 mg/L of chloride, 0.00 mg/L of nitrite, 10.36 mg/L of sulphate, 378.62 mg/L of nitrate, and 17.36 mg/L of ammonium. Hortifeeds 15-5-15 is commercially available from Hortifeeds, UK. Growth was carried out for a period of 12 months before harvesting. Once harvested, volume was assessed by using the Growing Media industry standard method: BS EN 12579:2000 “Soil Improvers and Growing Media”.
Results
[0141]
[0142] The results also show the improvement in growth is not limited to one particular species of Sphagnum and can be extrapolated across the genus. Improved growth was achieved in the four different species, namely Sphagnum fallax, Sphagnum palustre, Sphagnum capillifolium, and Sphagnum squarrosum.
[0143] Of particular interest is the comparison between the productivity of the Sphagnum species in the “Outside” conditions of the present invention and the productivity of Sphagnum papillosum of Wichmann et al (“Former Bog” and “Floating Mat” in
Example 3
Materials & Methods
[0144] Sphagnum was cultivated in accordance with a method of the present invention. BeadaGel™ (commercially available from BeadaMoss®, UK) was spread at 3 l/m.sup.2 on a peat surface in a glasshouse. Six species were used: Sphagnum capillifolium, Sphagnum fallax, Sphagnum magellanicum, Sphagnum papillosum, Sphagnum squarrosum, and Sphagnum palustre. The glasshouse was at a minimum temperature of 5° C. and ventilated at 20° C., and water was applied with overhead (spray) irrigation (applied at 2.6 l/m.sup.2 whenever the surface of the Sphagnum appeared dry). The water contained a nutrient composition comprising Hortifeeds NPK 15-5-15. This gave a final nutrient content comprising: 2.92 mg/L of sodium, 13.17 mg/L of magnesium, 106.50 mg/L of potassium, 36.96 mg/L of calcium, 0.41 mg/L of manganese, 0.09 mg/L of copper, 0.55 mg/L of zinc, 4.30 mg/L of sulfur, 0.19 mg/L of boron, 24.57 mg/L of phosphorus, 0.98 mg/L of iron, 0.05 mg/L of molybdenum, 0.16 mg/L of chloride, 0.00 mg/L of nitrite, 10.36 mg/L of sulphate, 378.62 mg/L of nitrate, and 17.36 mg/L of ammonium. Hortifeeds 15-5-15 is commercially available from Hortifeeds, UK. Growth was carried out for a period of 12 months before harvesting. Once harvested, volume was assessed by using the Growing Media industry standard method: BS EN 12579:2000 “Soil Improvers and Growing Media”.
Results
[0145]
[0146] Based on these results, it is technically credible that Sphagnum papillosum would have shown similar improved growth properties in the method of Example 2. Moreover, it would be expected that Sphagnum papillosum would perform better than Sphagnum fallax in the experiment the results of which are presented in
Example 4
Materials & Methods
[0147] Sphagnum was cultivated in accordance with a method of the present invention. In more detail, BeadaGel™ (commercially available from BeadaMoss®, UK) was spread at 3 l/m.sup.2 on a peat surface of a field. Sphagnum palustre was used. Water was supplied with overhead (spray) irrigation (applied at 2.6 l/m.sup.2 whenever the surface of the Sphagnum appeared dry). The water contained a nutrient composition comprising Hortifeeds NPK 15-5-15. This gave a final nutrient content comprising: 2.92 mg/L of sodium, 13.17 mg/L of magnesium, 106.50 mg/L of potassium, 36.96 mg/L of calcium, 0.41 mg/L of manganese, 0.09 mg/L of copper, 0.55 mg/L of zinc, 4.30 mg/L of sulfur, 0.19 mg/L of boron, 24.57 mg/L of phosphorus, 0.98 mg/L of iron, 0.05 mg/L of molybdenum, 0.16 mg/L of chloride, 0.00 mg/L of nitrite, 10.36 mg/L of sulphate, 378.62 mg/L of nitrate, and 17.36 mg/L of ammonium. Hortifeeds 15-5-15 is commercially available from Hortifeeds, UK. Growth was carried out for a period of 31 months before harvesting.
[0148] The harvest weight was measured, which is the wet weight of Sphagnum including the water it was holding. The dry weight was measured, which is the weight of Sphagnum once dried, without water. The dry weight was calculated after the Sphagnum had been heated until there was no further weight loss. This can be ensured by heating at 110° C. for 24 hours. The weight of water held by the Sphagnum is thus the difference in the harvest weight and the dry weight. Thus, the weight of water of the harvested Sphagnum was then calculated. The saturated weight of the Sphagnum was also measured by saturating the Sphagnum with water until it could hold no more water. The weight of the water of the saturated Sphagnum was then calculated. The ratios of the weight of water to the dry weight of Sphagnum were then calculated for the weight of water when the Sphagnum was harvested and the weight of water when the Sphagnum was saturated.
Results
[0149] The results are displayed below in Table 1. The maximum ratio achieved by saturating the Sphagnum is 43.80. A range of water content suitable for cultivation of Sphagnum may be expressed as a ratio of weight of water to dry weight of Sphagnum of between 5 and 60 (preferably less than 43.80) in order to cultivate the Sphagnum and to ensure that a surface of the Sphagnum remains in contact with air in order to permit gaseous exchange. In other words, the ratio is below saturation to facilitate growth and provide partial saturation. A preferred range is between 12 and 35.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Ratios of weights compared to dry weights of Sphagnum. Harvest Sphagnum Weight/g 104 Dry Sphagnum Weight/g 11.74 Harvest Water Weight/g 92.26 Saturated Sphagnum Weight/g 526 Saturated Water Weight/g 514.26 Ratio Harvest Water Weight to Dry Sphagnum Weight 7.86 Ratio Saturated Water Weight to Dry Sphagnum Weight 43.80
Example 5
Materials & Methods
[0150] Sphagnum was cultivated in accordance with a method of the present invention. In more detail, small plug-sized hummocks of Sphagnum, using BeadaHumok™ (commercially available from BeadaMoss®, UK) were planted in onto a bog grassland where the grass had been killed by herbicide and cultivation. Sphagnum palustre was used. BeadaHumok™ were planted by hand at a density of 30 units per m.sup.2 and water was applied using an irrigation system to controllably irrigate the Sphagnum in accordance with the invention. Water was applied at 2.6 l/m.sup.2 whenever the surface of the Sphagnum appeared dry. The water contained a nutrient composition comprising Hortifeeds NPK 15-5-15. This gave a final nutrient content comprising: 2.92 mg/L of sodium, 13.17 mg/L of magnesium, 106.50 mg/L of potassium, 36.96 mg/L of calcium, 0.41 mg/L of manganese, 0.09 mg/L of copper, 0.55 mg/L of zinc, 4.30 mg/L of sulfur, 0.19 mg/L of boron, 24.57 mg/L of phosphorus, 0.98 mg/L of iron, 0.05 mg/L of molybdenum, 0.16 mg/L of chloride, 0.00 mg/L of nitrite, 10.36 mg/L of sulphate, 378.62 mg/L of nitrate, and 17.36 mg/L of ammonium. Hortifeeds 15-5-15 is commercially available from Hortifeeds, UK. A trial was conducted using spray irrigation, and another trial was conducted using drip irrigation. Four replicate plots of size 2 m×2 m were used for each of the four treatments, under each of the irrigation systems. The treatments were ‘no cover’ and 3 different cover materials: straw (applied at 0.3 kg/m.sup.2); perforated white plastic; and a very fine woven insect mesh of 0.3×0.7 mm 120 g/m.sup.2. The initial size of the hummocks was measured and growth in terms of percentage increase in coverage area was assessed again two months later.
Results
[0151]
Example 6
Materials & Methods
[0152] Sphagnum was applied to a peat surface and a peat surface with a fleece cover and grown under the same conditions. Sphagnum was cultivated in accordance with a method of the present invention. In more detail, BeadaGel™ (commercially available from BeadaMoss®, UK) was spread at 3 l/m.sup.2 on a peat surface of a field. The species used was Sphagnum capillifolium. Water was supplied with overhead (spray) irrigation (applied at 2.6 l/m.sup.2 whenever the surface of the Sphagnum appeared dry). The water contained a nutrient composition comprising Hortifeeds NPK 15-5-15. This gave a final nutrient content comprising: 2.92 mg/L of sodium, 13.17 mg/L of magnesium, 106.50 mg/L of potassium, 36.96 mg/L of calcium, 0.41 mg/L of manganese, 0.09 mg/L of copper, 0.55 mg/L of zinc, 4.30 mg/L of sulfur, 0.19 mg/L of boron, 24.57 mg/L of phosphorus, 0.98 mg/L of iron, 0.05 mg/L of molybdenum, 0.16 mg/L of chloride, 0.00 mg/L of nitrite, 10.36 mg/L of sulphate, 378.62 mg/L of nitrate, and 17.36 mg/L of ammonium. Hortifeeds 15-5-15 is commercially available from Hortifeeds, UK. Growth was carried out for a period of 43 weeks.
Results
[0153]
Example 7
Materials & Methods
[0154] Sphagnum palustre was cultivated in accordance with a method of the present invention. In more detail, Sphagnum was applied onto a field with peatland soil, and a field with organo-mineral soil. Sphagnum palustre was used. Water was applied using an irrigation system to controllably irrigate the Sphagnum in accordance with the invention. Water was applied at 2.6 l/m.sup.2 whenever the surface of the Sphagnum appeared dry. The water contained a nutrient composition comprising Hortifeeds NPK 15-5-15. This gave a final nutrient content comprising: 2.92 mg/L of sodium, 13.17 mg/L of magnesium, 106.50 mg/L of potassium, 36.96 mg/L of calcium, 0.41 mg/L of manganese, 0.09 mg/L of copper, 0.55 mg/L of zinc, 4.30 mg/L of sulfur, 0.19 mg/L of boron, 24.57 mg/L of phosphorus, 0.98 mg/L of iron, 0.05 mg/L of molybdenum, 0.16 mg/L of chloride, 0.00 mg/L of nitrite, 10.36 mg/L of sulphate, 378.62 mg/L of nitrate, and 17.36 mg/L of ammonium. Hortifeeds 15-5-15 is commercially available from Hortifeeds, UK. Irrigation was applied using spray irrigation and drip irrigation. The treatments were ‘no cover’ and 3 different cover materials: straw (applied at 0.3 kg/m.sup.2); perforated white plastic; and a very fine woven insect mesh of 0.3×0.7 mm 120 g/m.sup.2. The Sphagnum was cultivated for 18 months, and the coverage of the Sphagnum for each treatment was observed. The coverage of Sphagnum over the area was measured as a percentage cover at intervals over a 7 month period. The greenhouse gas balance was measured in intervals to determine when net zero and sequestration were achieved.
Results
[0155]
[0156] As shown in
[0157] In the peatland trial, the Sphagnum with the plastic cover was observed to be greener than no cover or straw, and this was believed to be due to the shading effect of the plastic. Establishment was very good, and 100% coverage was achieved after 9-10 months. Observed growth under hot and dry conditions was particularly good due to the shading and good humidity and water retention. Weed ingress was much less than straw and no cover. In the organo-mineral trial, in
[0158] As shown in
[0159] In the peatland trial, the Sphagnum with the mesh cover performed similarly to the plastic cover but with faster establishment. Weed ingress was much lower than no cover and straw, and similar to the plastic cover. The mesh was far more robust than the plastic cover, and did not deteriorate, even over the 18 month period. Therefore, the mesh cover does not need replacing, providing a significant advantage, especially on large scale sites. Meanwhile, the mesh was observed to perform well under low light levels. In the organo-mineral trial, the establishment was excellent, and the growth was superior to other treatments.
[0160] Both the plastic and the mesh covers achieved a greenhouse gas balance (net zero) within 9 months after application, and provided significant sequestration in 10 months. This provides a dramatic effect for Sphagnum farming, and shows the advantages of such covers compared to no cover.
[0161] The two irrigation systems (drip and spray) were also compared on the different sites (peatland and organo-mineral). Drip irrigation was found to perform well on organo-mineral soil as this was relatively impermeable compared to peatland (i.e. not cracked), and so the water was able to spread over the surface without soaking into the soil, reducing wastage. During periods of irrigation interruption, the water on the surface acted as an extra buffer which provided an advantage.
[0162] Spray irrigation performed better on peatland soil as this was very permeable. The drip irrigation led to large water losses on permeable soil, which meant the spray system was more efficient and resulted in better growth for the same amount of water applied. The spray irrigation kept the Sphagnum sufficiently moist at the growing points (capitula at the top of the Sphagnum) without use of excessive amounts of water because the irrigation was supplied from above to the upper surface of the Sphagnum. The spray irrigation also does not rely on capillary action from the surface of the field to the top of the Sphagnum (e.g. capitula), meaning that water supply and thus growth does not deteriorate when the Sphagnum becomes taller and capillary action becomes less efficient over the larger distance.
[0163] All publications mentioned in the above specification are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations of the described methods and system of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in agriculture, horticulture, and plant technology or related fields are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.