Coated packaging
11344473 · 2022-05-31
Assignee
Inventors
- Christopher Weikart (Auburn, AL, US)
- Becky L. Clark (Auburn, AL, US)
- Adam Stevenson (Opelika, AL, US)
- John T. Felts (Alameda, CA)
Cpc classification
C23C16/45523
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61M2005/3131
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M2205/0238
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C23C16/045
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61J1/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G01N2800/042
PHYSICS
G01N27/227
PHYSICS
G01N33/5308
PHYSICS
A61L31/16
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61L31/088
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G01N33/74
PHYSICS
A61J1/1468
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61J1/05
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61J1/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61L31/14
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61L31/16
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61J1/05
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C23C16/455
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C23C16/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A vessel has an interior surface facing a lumen. The interior surface includes a tie coating or layer, a barrier coating or layer, and a pH protective coating or layer. The tie coating or layer can comprise SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or SiN.sub.xC.sub.y, where x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3. The barrier coating or layer can comprise SiO.sub.x, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9. The barrier coating or layer reduces the ingress of atmospheric gas into the lumen. The pH protective coating or layer can comprise SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or SiN.sub.xC.sub.y, as well. In an embodiment, in the presence of a fluid composition contained in the lumen and having a pH between 5 and 9, the calculated shelf life of the package can be more than six months at a storage temperature of 4° C.
Claims
1. A vessel comprising: a thermoplastic wall having an interior surface enclosing at least a portion of a lumen; a tie coating or layer comprising SiO.sub.xC.sub.yH.sub.z or SiN.sub.xC.sub.yH.sub.z in which x is from 0.5 to 2.4 as measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), y is from 0.6 to 3 as measured by XPS, and z is from 2 to 9 as measured by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS), the tie coating or layer having an outer surface facing the interior surface of the thermoplastic wall and the tie coating or layer having an interior surface; a barrier coating or layer of SiO.sub.x, in which x is from 1.5 to 2.9 as measured by XPS, the barrier coating or layer positioned between the interior surface of the tie coating or layer and the lumen; and a pH protective coating or layer of SiO.sub.xC.sub.yH.sub.z, in which x is from 0.5 to 2.4 as measured by XPS, y is from 0.6 to 3 as measured by XPS, and z is from 2 to 9 as measured by RBS, positioned between the barrier coating or layer and the lumen, in which an FTIR absorbance spectrum of the pH protective coating or layer has a ratio greater than 0.9 between: the maximum amplitude of the Si-O-Si symmetrical stretch peak between 1000 and 1040 cm.sup.−1, and the maximum amplitude of the Si-O-Si asymmetric stretch peak between 1060 and 1100 cm.sup.−1; in which the silicon dissolution rate by a 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer diluted in water for injection, adjusted to pH 8 with concentrated nitric acid, and containing 0.2 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant, from the vessel is less than 170 ppb/day.
2. The vessel of claim 1, in which at least one of the tie coating or layer, the barrier coating or layer, or the pH protective coating or layer is applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).
3. The vessel of claim 1, which is a syringe barrel, a vial, a cartridge or a blister package.
4. The vessel of claim 1, in which at least a portion of the thermoplastic wall comprises: a polyolefin a polyvinylalcohol a polymethacrylate ether a polyacrylic acid a polyamide a polyimide a polysulfone a polylactic acid a cyclic olefin polymer or copolymer a polyester or a combination of a polyolefin and a polyester.
5. The vessel of claim 1, in which, for at least one of the pH protective coating or layer or the tie coating or layer, x is from 1 to 2 as measured by XPS, y is from 0.6 to 1.5 as measured by XPS, and z is from 2 to 5 as measured by RBS.
6. The vessel of claim 1, in which the pH protective coating or layer is from 10 to 1000 nm thick.
7. The vessel of claim 1, in which the rate of erosion of the pH protective coating or layer, if directly contacted by a fluid contained in the lumen having a pH greater than 5, is less than 20% of the rate of erosion of the barrier coating or layer, if directly contacted by the same fluid under the same conditions.
8. The vessel of claim 1, having a shelf life, while directly contacted by a fluid contained in the lumen having a pH greater than 5, of at least two years, based on storage of the vessel containing the fluid at 20° C.
9. The vessel of claim 1, in which a fluid contained in the lumen having a pH greater than 5 removes the pH protective coating or layer at a rate of 1 nm or less of pH protective coating or layer thickness per 88 hours of contact with the fluid.
10. The vessel of claim 1, wherein the pH protective coating or layer shows an O-Parameter measured with attenuated total reflection (ATR) of less than 0.4, measured as:
11. The vessel of claim 1, in which the tie coating or layer has an average thickness from 5 to 200 nm.
12. The vessel of claim 1, which is a prefilled syringe having a syringe barrel coated on its interior wall with the tie coating or layer, barrier coating or layer, and pH protective coating or layer, further having a plunger seated in the barrel and containing a pharmaceutical composition having a pH greater than 5 contained in the lumen, the prefilled syringe having a shelf life of at least six months.
13. A process for making a vessel according to claim 1, the process comprising the steps: forming a tie coating or layer; forming a barrier coating or layer; and forming a pH protective coating or layer positioned between the barrier coating or layer and the lumen, the pH protective coating or layer and tie coating or layer together being effective to keep the barrier coating or layer at least substantially undissolved as a result of attack by a fluid contained in the lumen having a pH greater than 5 for a period of at least six months.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34) The following reference characters are used in the drawing figures:
(35) TABLE-US-00001 210 Pharmaceutical package 212 Lumen 214 Wall 216 Outer surface 218 Fluid 220 Interior surface (of 288) 222 Outer surface (of 288) 224 Interior surface (of 286) 226 Outer surface (of 286) 228 Vial 230 Blister package 250 Syringe barrel 252 Syringe 254 Inner or interior surface (of 250) 256 Back end (of 250) 258 Plunger (of 252) (relatively sliding part) 259 Lubricant 260 Front end (of 250) 262 Closure 264 Inner or interior surface (of 262) 268 Vessel 270 Closure 272 Interior facing surface 274 Lumen 276 Wall-contacting surface 278 Inner or interior surface (of 280) 280 Vessel wall 281 Lubricity coating or layer 282 Stopper 283 PH protective coating or layer 284 Shield 285 Vessel coating or layer set 286 pH protective coating or layer 287 Deposit of lubricant 288 Barrier layer 289 Tie coating or layer 290 Apparatus for coating, for example, 250 292 Inner or interior surface (of 294) 294 Restricted opening (of 250) 296 Processing vessel 298 Outer surface (of 250) 302 Tie coater 304 Barrier coater 306 pH protective coater 308 Fluid filler 310 Fluid supply 312 Closure installer 314 Closure supply
(36) In the context of the present invention, the following definitions and abbreviations are used:
(37) The term “at least” in the context of the present invention means “equal or more” than the integer following the term. The word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality unless indicated otherwise. Whenever a parameter range is indicated, it is intended to disclose the parameter values given as limits of the range and all values of the parameter falling within said range.
(38) “First” and “second” or similar references to, for example, deposits of lubricant, processing stations or processing devices refer to the minimum number of deposits, processing stations or devices that are present, but do not necessarily represent the order or total number of deposits, processing stations and devices or require additional deposits, processing stations and devices beyond the stated number. These terms do not limit the number of processing stations or the particular processing carried out at the respective stations. For example, a “first” deposit in the context of this specification can be either the only deposit or any one of plural deposits, without limitation. In other words, recitation of a “first” deposit allows but does not require an embodiment that also has a second or further deposit.
(39) For purposes of the present invention, an “organosilicon precursor” is a compound having at least one of the linkages:
(40) ##STR00001##
which is a tetravalent silicon atom connected to an oxygen or nitrogen atom and an organic carbon atom (an organic carbon atom being a carbon atom bonded to at least one hydrogen atom). A volatile organosilicon precursor, defined as such a precursor that can be supplied as a vapor in a PECVD apparatus, is an optional organosilicon precursor. Optionally, the organosilicon precursor is selected from the group consisting of a linear siloxane, a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, an alkyl trimethoxysilane, a linear silazane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, and a combination of any two or more of these precursors.
(41) The feed amounts of PECVD precursors, gaseous reactant or process gases, and carrier gas are sometimes expressed in “standard volumes” in the specification and claims. The standard volume of a charge or other fixed amount of gas is the volume the fixed amount of the gas would occupy at a standard temperature and pressure (without regard to the actual temperature and pressure of delivery). Standard volumes can be measured using different units of volume, and still be within the scope of the present disclosure and claims. For example, the same fixed amount of gas could be expressed as the number of standard cubic centimeters, the number of standard cubic meters, or the number of standard cubic feet. Standard volumes can also be defined using different standard temperatures and pressures, and still be within the scope of the present disclosure and claims. For example, the standard temperature might be 0° C. and the standard pressure might be 760 Torr (as is conventional), or the standard temperature might be 20° C. and the standard pressure might be 1 Torr. But whatever standard is used in a given case, when comparing relative amounts of two or more different gases without specifying particular parameters, the same units of volume, standard temperature, and standard pressure are to be used relative to each gas, unless otherwise indicated.
(42) The corresponding feed rates of PECVD precursors, gaseous reactant or process gases, and carrier gas are expressed in standard volumes per unit of time in the specification. For example, in the working examples the flow rates are expressed as standard cubic centimeters per minute, abbreviated as sccm. As with the other parameters, other units of time can be used, such as seconds or hours, but consistent parameters are to be used when comparing the flow rates of two or more gases, unless otherwise indicated.
(43) A “vessel” in the context of the present invention can be any type of vessel with at least one opening and a wall defining an inner or interior surface. The substrate can be the wall of a vessel having a lumen. Though the invention is not necessarily limited to pharmaceutical packages or other vessels of a particular volume, pharmaceutical packages or other vessels are contemplated in which the lumen has a void volume of from 0.5 to 50 mL, optionally from 1 to 10 mL, optionally from 0.5 to 5 mL, optionally from 1 to 3 mL. The substrate surface can be part or all of the inner or interior surface of a vessel having at least one opening and an inner or interior surface. Some examples of a pharmaceutical package include, but are not limited to, a vial, a plastic-coated vial, a syringe, a plastic coated syringe, a blister pack, an ampoule, a plastic coated ampoule, a cartridge, a bottle, a plastic coated bottle, a pouch, a pump, a sprayer, a stopper, a needle, a plunger, a cap, a stent, a catheter or an implant.
(44) The term “at least” in the context of the present invention means “equal or more” than the integer following the term. Thus, a vessel in the context of the present invention has one or more openings. One or two openings, like the openings of a sample tube (one opening) or a syringe barrel (two openings) are preferred. If the vessel has two openings, they can be of same or different size. If there is more than one opening, one opening can be used for the gas inlet for a PECVD coating method according to the present invention, while the other openings are either capped or open. A vessel according to the present invention can be a sample tube, for example for collecting or storing biological fluids like blood or urine, a syringe (or a part thereof, for example a syringe barrel) for storing or delivering a biologically active compound or composition, for example a medicament or pharmaceutical composition, a vial for storing biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions, a pipe, for example a catheter for transporting biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions, or a cuvette for holding fluids, for example for holding biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions.
(45) A vessel can be of any shape, a vessel having a substantially cylindrical wall adjacent to at least one of its open ends being preferred. Generally, the interior wall of the vessel is cylindrically shaped, like, for example in a sample tube or a syringe barrel. Sample tubes and syringes or their parts (for example syringe barrels) are contemplated.
(46) A “hydrophobic layer” in the context of the present invention means that the coating or layer lowers the wetting tension of a surface coated with the coating or layer, compared to the corresponding uncoated surface. Hydrophobicity is thus a function of both the uncoated substrate and the coating or layer. The same applies with appropriate alterations for other contexts wherein the term “hydrophobic” is used. The term “hydrophilic” means the opposite, i.e. that the wetting tension is increased compared to reference sample. The present hydrophobic layers are primarily defined by their hydrophobicity and the process conditions providing hydrophobicity.
(47) In the empirical composition Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.yH.sub.z or the equivalent composition SiO.sub.xC.sub.y, the values of w, x, y, and z used throughout this specification should be understood as ratios or an empirical formula (for example for a coating or layer), rather than as a limit on the number or type of atoms in a molecule. For example, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, which has the molecular composition Si.sub.4O.sub.4C.sub.8H.sub.24, can be described by the following empirical formula, arrived at by dividing each of w, x, y, and z in the molecular formula by 4, the largest common factor: Si.sub.1O.sub.1C.sub.2H.sub.6. The values of w, x, y, and z are also not limited to integers. For example, (acyclic) octamethyltrisiloxane, molecular composition Si.sub.3O.sub.2C.sub.8H.sub.24, is reducible to Si.sub.1O.sub.0.67C.sub.2.67H.sub.8. Also, although SiO.sub.xC.sub.yH.sub.z is described as equivalent to SiO.sub.xC.sub.y, it is not necessary to show the presence of hydrogen in any proportion to show the presence of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y.
(48) “Wetting tension” is a specific measure for the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of a surface. An optional wetting tension measurement method in the context of the present invention is ASTM D 2578 or a modification of the method described in ASTM D 2578. This method uses standard wetting tension solutions (called dyne solutions) to determine the solution that comes nearest to wetting a plastic film surface for exactly two seconds. This is the film's wetting tension. The procedure utilized is varied herein from ASTM D 2578 in that the substrates are not flat plastic films, but are tubes made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube and (except for controls) coated according to the Protocol for coating Tube Interior with Hydrophobic Coating or Layer (see Example 9 of EP2251671 A2).
(49) The atomic ratios of silicon, oxygen, and carbon can be determined by XPS. The atomic ratio of H atoms cannot be measured by XPS, which does not detect hydrogen. Optionally, the proportion of H atoms can be determined separately, for example by Rutherford backscattering or hydrogen forward scattering, preferably the former. Also, unless otherwise indicated here, the value of w is normalized to 1, and the subscript w is then conventionally omitted. The coating or layer may thus in one aspect have the formula Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.yH.sub.z, for example where w is 1, x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4, y is from about 0.6 to about 3, and z is from about 2 to about 9. The same coating or layer, with the same determination of w, x, and y, may thus in another aspect have the formula SiO.sub.xC.sub.y, for example where x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4, y is from about 0.6 to about 3, and w and z are omitted. Typically, such coating or layer would hence contain 36% to 41% carbon normalized to 100% carbon plus oxygen plus silicon.
(50) The term “syringe” is broadly defined to include cartridges, injection “pens,” and other types of barrels or reservoirs adapted to be assembled with one or more other components to provide a functional syringe. “Syringe” is also broadly defined to include related articles such as auto-injectors, which provide a mechanism for dispensing the contents.
(51) A coating or layer or treatment is defined as “hydrophobic” if it lowers the wetting tension of a surface, compared to the corresponding uncoated or untreated surface. Hydrophobicity is thus a function of both the untreated substrate and the treatment.
(52) the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps,
(53) the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(54) The present invention will now be described more fully, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which several embodiments are shown. This invention can, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth here. Rather, these embodiments are examples of the invention, which has the full scope indicated by the language of the claims. Like numbers refer to like or corresponding elements throughout. The following disclosure relates to all embodiments unless specifically limited to a certain embodiment.
(55) Referring to
(56) The vessel 210 of
(57) The wall 214 has an interior surface facing the lumen, an outer surface, and a vessel coating set 285 on at least a portion of the wall 214 facing the lumen 212. The interior surface comprises a tie coating or layer 289, a barrier coating or layer 288, and a pH protective coating or layer 286. This embodiment of the vessel coating or layer set 285 is sometimes known as a “trilayer coating” in which the barrier coating or layer 288 of SiO.sub.x optionally is protected against contents having a pH otherwise high enough to remove it by being sandwiched between the pH protective coating or layer 286 and the tie coating or layer 289, each an organic layer of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y as defined in this specification.
(58)
(59) Tie Coating or Layer
(60) Referring to
(61) Optionally, the tie coating or layer 289 improves adhesion of the barrier coating or layer 288 to the substrate or wall 214. For example, the tie coating or layer 289, also referred to as an adhesion layer or coating, can be applied to the substrate and the barrier layer can be applied to the adhesion layer to improve adhesion of the barrier layer or coating to the substrate. Optionally, the adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 is also believed to relieve stress on the barrier coating or layer 288, making the barrier layer less subject to damage from thermal expansion or contraction or mechanical shock.
(62) Optionally, the tie coating or layer 289 applied under a barrier coating or layer 288 can improve the function of a pH protective coating or layer 286 applied over the barrier coating or layer 288.
(63) Optionally, the adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 is also believed to decouple defects between the barrier coating or layer 288 and the COP substrate. This is believed to occur because any pinholes or other defects that may be formed when the adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 is applied tend not to be continued when the barrier coating or layer 288 is applied, so the pinholes or other defects in one coating do not line up with defects in the other. Optionally, the adhesion or tie coating or layer 289 has some efficacy as a barrier layer, so even a defect providing a leakage path extending through the barrier coating or layer 289 is blocked by the adhesion or tie coating or layer 289.
(64) Optionally, the tie coating or layer 289 comprises SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or SiN.sub.xC.sub.y, preferably can be composed of, comprise, or consist essentially of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y, wherein x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3. The atomic ratios of Si, O, and C in the tie coating or layer 289 optionally can be:
(65) Si 100:O 50-150:C 90-200 (i.e. x=0.5 to 1.5, y=0.9 to 2);
(66) Si 100:O 70-130:C 90-200 (i.e. x=0.7 to 1.3, y=0.9 to 2)
(67) Si 100:O 80-120:C 90-150 (i.e. x=0.8 to 1.2, y=0.9 to 1.5)
(68) Si 100:O 90-120:C 90-140 (i.e. x=0.9 to 1.2, y=0.9 to 1.4), or
(69) Si 100:O 92-107:C 116-133 (i.e. x=0.92 to 1.07, y=1.16 to 1.33).
(70) The atomic ratio can be determined by XPS. Taking into account the H atoms, which are not measured by XPS, the tie coating or layer 289 may thus in one aspect have the formula Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.yH.sub.z (or its equivalent SiO.sub.xC.sub.y), for example where w is 1, x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4, y is from about 0.6 to about 3, and z is from about 2 to about 9. Typically, tie coating or layer 289 would hence contain 36% to 41% carbon normalized to 100% carbon plus oxygen plus silicon.
(71) Optionally, the tie coating or layer can be similar or identical in composition with the pH protective coating or layer 286 described elsewhere in this specification, although this is not a requirement.
(72) Optionally, the tie coating or layer 289 is on average between 5 and 200 nm (nanometers), optionally between 5 and 100 nm, optionally between 5 and 20 nm thick. These thicknesses are not critical. Commonly but not necessarily, the tie coating or layer 289 will be relatively thin, since its function is to change the surface properties of the substrate.
(73) The tie coating or layer 289 has an interior surface facing the lumen 212 and an outer surface facing the wall 214 interior surface. Optionally, the tie coating or layer 286 is at least coextensive with the barrier coating or layer. Optionally, the tie coating or layer is applied by PECVD, for example of a precursor feed comprising octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS), tetramethyldisiloxane (TMDSO), or hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO).
(74) Barrier Coating or Layer
(75) Referring to
(76) The barrier coating or layer 286 optionally can be applied directly or indirectly to the thermoplastic wall 214 (for example the tie coating or layer 289 can be interposed between them) so that in the filled pharmaceutical package or other vessel 210 the barrier coating or layer 286 is located between the inner or interior surface of the wall 214 and the lumen 212 that is adapted to contain a fluid to be stored. The barrier coating or layer 286 of SiO.sub.x is supported by the thermoplastic wall 214. The barrier coating or layer 286 as described elsewhere in this specification, or in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188, can be used in any embodiment.
(77) The barrier layer optionally is characterized as an “SiO.sub.x” coating, and contains silicon, oxygen, and optionally other elements, in which x, the ratio of oxygen to silicon atoms, is from about 1.5 to about 2.9, or 1.5 to about 2.6, or about 2. One suitable barrier composition is one where x is 2.3, for example.
(78) Optionally, the barrier coating or layer 288 is from 2 to 1000 nm thick, optionally from 4 nm to 500 nm thick, optionally between 10 and 200 nm thick, optionally from 20 to 200 nm thick, optionally from 20 to 30 nm thick, and comprises SiO.sub.x, wherein x is from 1.5 to 2.9. The barrier coating or layer 288 of SiO.sub.x has an interior surface 220 facing the lumen 212 and an outer surface 222 facing the interior surface of the tie coating or layer 289. For example, the barrier coating or layer such as 288 of any embodiment can be applied at a thickness of at least 2 nm, or at least 4 nm, or at least 7 nm, or at least 10 nm, or at least 20 nm, or at least 30 nm, or at least 40 nm, or at least 50 nm, or at least 100 nm, or at least 150 nm, or at least 200 nm, or at least 300 nm, or at least 400 nm, or at least 500 nm, or at least 600 nm, or at least 700 nm, or at least 800 nm, or at least 900 nm. The barrier coating or layer can be up to 1000 nm, or at most 900 nm, or at most 800 nm, or at most 700 nm, or at most 600 nm, or at most 500 nm, or at most 400 nm, or at most 300 nm, or at most 200 nm, or at most 100 nm, or at most 90 nm, or at most 80 nm, or at most 70 nm, or at most 60 nm, or at most 50 nm, or at most 40 nm, or at most 30 nm, or at most 20 nm, or at most 10 nm, or at most 5 nm thick.
(79) Ranges of from 4 nm to 500 nm thick, optionally from 7 nm to 400 nm thick, optionally from 10 nm to 300 nm thick, optionally from 20 nm to 200 nm thick, optionally from 20 to 30 nm thick, optionally from 30 nm to 100 nm thick are contemplated. Specific thickness ranges composed of any one of the minimum thicknesses expressed above, plus any equal or greater one of the maximum thicknesses expressed above, are expressly contemplated.
(80) The thickness of the SiO.sub.x or other barrier coating or layer can be measured, for example, by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and its composition can be measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
(81) Optionally, the barrier coating or layer 288 is effective to reduce the ingress of atmospheric gas into the lumen compared to a vessel without a barrier coating or layer. Optionally, the barrier coating or layer 288 provides a barrier to oxygen that has permeated the wall 214. Optionally, the barrier coating or layer 288 is a barrier to extraction of the composition of the wall 214 by the contents of the lumen 212.
(82) pH Protective Coating or Layer
(83) Certain barrier coatings or layers 286 such as SiO.sub.x as defined here have been found to have the characteristic of being subject to being measurably diminished in barrier improvement factor in less than six months as a result of attack by certain relatively high pH contents of the coated vessel as described elsewhere in this specification, particularly where the barrier coating or layer directly contacts the contents. The inventors have found that barrier layers or coatings of SiO.sub.x are eroded or dissolved by some fluids, for example aqueous compositions having a pH above about 5. Since coatings applied by chemical vapor deposition can be very thin—tens to hundreds of nanometers thick—even a relatively slow rate of erosion can remove or reduce the effectiveness of the barrier layer in less time than the desired shelf life of a product package. This is particularly a problem for aqueous fluid pharmaceutical compositions, since many of them have a pH of roughly 7, or more broadly in the range of 4 to 8, alternatively from 5 to 9, similar to the pH of blood and other human or animal fluids. The higher the pH of the pharmaceutical preparation, the more quickly it erodes or dissolves the SiO.sub.x coating. Optionally, this problem can be addressed by protecting the barrier coating or layer 288, or other pH sensitive material, with a pH protective coating or layer 286.
(84) The pH protective coating or layer 286 optionally provides protection of the underlying barrier coating or layer 288 against contents of the vessel 210 having a pH from 4 to 8, including where a surfactant is present. For a prefilled pharmaceutical package that is in contact with the contents of the lumen 212 from the time it is manufactured to the time it is used, the pH protective coating or layer 286 optionally prevents or inhibits attack of the barrier coating or layer 288 sufficiently to maintain an effective oxygen barrier over the intended shelf life of the prefilled syringe. The rate of erosion, dissolution, or leaching (different names for related concepts) of the pH protective coating or layer 286, if directly contacted by a fluid, is less than the rate of erosion of the barrier coating or layer 288, if directly contacted by the fluid having a pH of from 5 to 9. The pH protective coating or layer 286 is effective to isolate a fluid 218 having a pH between 5 and 9 from the barrier coating or layer 288, at least for sufficient time to allow the barrier coating to act as a barrier during the shelf life of the pharmaceutical package or other vessel 210.
(85) The inventors have further found that certain pH protective coatings or layers of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or SiN.sub.xC.sub.y formed from polysiloxane precursors, which pH protective coatings or layers have a substantial organic component, do not erode quickly when exposed to fluids, and in fact erode or dissolve more slowly when the fluids have pHs within the range of 4 to 8 or 5 to 9. For example, at pH 8, the dissolution rate of a pH protective coating or layer made from the precursor octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, or OMCTS, is quite slow. These pH protective coatings or layers of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or SiN.sub.xC.sub.y can therefore be used to cover a barrier layer of SiO.sub.x, retaining the benefits of the barrier layer by protecting it from the fluid in the pharmaceutical package. The protective layer is applied over at least a portion of the SiO.sub.x layer to protect the SiO.sub.x layer from contents stored in a vessel, where the contents otherwise would be in contact with the SiO.sub.x layer.
(86) Although the present invention does not depend upon the accuracy of the following theory, it is further believed that effective pH protective coatings or layers for avoiding erosion can be made from siloxanes and silazanes as described in this disclosure. SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or SiN.sub.xC.sub.y coatings deposited from cyclic siloxane or linear silazane precursors, for example octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS), are believed to include intact cyclic siloxane rings and longer series of repeating units of the precursor structure. These coatings are believed to be nanoporous but structured and hydrophobic, and these properties are believed to contribute to their success as pH protective coatings or layers, and also protective coatings or layers. This is shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,901,783. SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or SiN.sub.xC.sub.y coatings also can be deposited from linear siloxane or linear silazane precursors, for example hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) or tetramethyldisiloxane (TMDSO).
(87) The inventors offer the following theory of operation of the pH protective coating or layer described here. The invention is not limited by the accuracy of this theory or to the embodiments predictable by use of this theory.
(88) The dissolution rate of the SiO.sub.x barrier layer is believed to be dependent on SiO.sub.x bonding within the layer. Oxygen bonding sites (silanols) are believed to increase the dissolution rate.
(89) It is believed that the OMCTS-based pH protective coating or layer bonds with the silanol sites on the SiO.sub.x barrier layer to “heal” or passivate the SiO.sub.x surface and thus dramatically reduces the dissolution rate. In this hypothesis, the thickness of the OMCTS layer is not the primary means of protection—the primary means is passivation of the SiO.sub.x surface. It is contemplated that a pH protective coating or layer as described in this specification can be improved by increasing the crosslink density of the pH protective coating or layer.
(90) The pH protective coating or layer 286 optionally is effective to keep the barrier coating or layer 288 at least substantially undissolved as a result of attack by the fluid 218 for a period of at least six months.
(91) The pH protective coating or layer optionally can prevent or reduce the precipitation of a compound or component of a composition in contact with the pH protective coating or layer, in particular can prevent or reduce insulin precipitation or blood clotting, in comparison to the uncoated surface and/or to a barrier coated surface using HMDSO as precursor.
(92) Referring to
(93) Si 100:O 50-150:C 90-200 (i.e. x=0.5 to 1.5, y=0.9 to 2);
(94) Si 100:O 70-130:C 90-200 (i.e. x=0.7 to 1.3, y=0.9 to 2)
(95) Si 100:O 80-120:C 90-150 (i.e. x=0.8 to 1.2, y=0.9 to 1.5)
(96) Si 100:O 90-120:C 90-140 (i.e. x=0.9 to 1.2, y=0.9 to 1.4), or
(97) Si 100:O 92-107:C 116-133 (i.e. x=0.92 to 1.07, y=1.16 to 1.33) or
(98) Si 100:O 80-130:C 90-150.
(99) Alternatively, the pH protective coating or layer can have atomic concentrations normalized to 100% carbon, oxygen, and silicon, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of less than 50% carbon and more than 25% silicon. Alternatively, the atomic concentrations are from 25 to 45% carbon, 25 to 65% silicon, and 10 to 35% oxygen. Alternatively, the atomic concentrations are from 30 to 40% carbon, 32 to 52% silicon, and 20 to 27% oxygen. Alternatively, the atomic concentrations are from 33 to 37% carbon, 37 to 47% silicon, and 22 to 26% oxygen.
(100) Optionally, the atomic concentration of carbon in the pH protective coating or layer, normalized to 100% of carbon, oxygen, and silicon, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), can be greater than the atomic concentration of carbon in the atomic formula for the organosilicon precursor. For example, embodiments are contemplated in which the atomic concentration of carbon increases by from 1 to 80 atomic percent, alternatively from 10 to 70 atomic percent, alternatively from 20 to 60 atomic percent, alternatively from 30 to 50 atomic percent, alternatively from 35 to 45 atomic percent, alternatively from 37 to 41 atomic percent.
(101) Optionally, the atomic ratio of carbon to oxygen in the pH protective coating or layer can be increased in comparison to the organosilicon precursor, and/or the atomic ratio of oxygen to silicon can be decreased in comparison to the organosilicon precursor.
(102) Optionally, the pH protective coating or layer can have an atomic concentration of silicon, normalized to 100% of carbon, oxygen, and silicon, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), less than the atomic concentration of silicon in the atomic formula for the feed gas. For example, embodiments are contemplated in which the atomic concentration of silicon decreases by from 1 to 80 atomic percent, alternatively by from 10 to 70 atomic percent, alternatively by from 20 to 60 atomic percent, alternatively by from 30 to 55 atomic percent, alternatively by from 40 to 50 atomic percent, alternatively by from 42 to 46 atomic percent.
(103) As another option, a pH protective coating or layer is contemplated in any embodiment that can be characterized by a sum formula wherein the atomic ratio C:O can be increased and/or the atomic ratio Si:O can be decreased in comparison to the sum formula of the organosilicon precursor.
(104) The atomic ratio of Si:O:C or Si:N:C can be determined by XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy). Taking into account the H atoms, the pH protective coating or layer may thus in one aspect have the formula Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.yH.sub.z, or its equivalent SiO.sub.xC.sub.y, for example where w is 1, x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4, y is from about 0.6 to about 3, and z is from about 2 to about 9.
(105) The thickness of the pH protective coating or layer as applied optionally is between 10 and 1000 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 900 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 800 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 700 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 600 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 500 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 400 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 300 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 200 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 100 nm; alternatively from 10 nm to 50 nm; alternatively from 20 nm to 1000 nm; alternatively from 50 nm to 1000 nm; alternatively from 50 nm to 800 nm; optionally from 50 to 500 nm; optionally from 100 to 200 nm; alternatively from 100 nm to 700 nm; alternatively from 100 nm to 200 nm; alternatively from 300 to 600 nm. The thickness does not need to be uniform throughout the vessel, and will typically vary from the preferred values in portions of a vessel.
(106) The pH protective coating or layer can have a density between 1.25 and 1.65 g/cm.sup.3, alternatively between 1.35 and 1.55 g/cm.sup.3, alternatively between 1.4 and 1.5 g/cm.sup.3, alternatively between 1.4 and 1.5 g/cm.sup.3, alternatively between 1.44 and 1.48 g/cm.sup.3, as determined by X-ray reflectivity (XRR). Optionally, the organosilicon compound can be octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and the pH protective coating or layer can have a density which can be higher than the density of a pH protective coating or layer made from HMDSO as the organosilicon compound under the same PECVD reaction conditions.
(107) The pH protective coating or layer optionally can have an RMS surface roughness value (measured by AFM) of from about 5 to about 9, optionally from about 6 to about 8, optionally from about 6.4 to about 7.8. The R.sub.a surface roughness value of the pH protective coating or layer, measured by AFM, can be from about 4 to about 6, optionally from about 4.6 to about 5.8. The R.sub.max surface roughness value of the pH protective coating or layer, measured by AFM, can be from about 70 to about 160, optionally from about 84 to about 142, optionally from about 90 to about 130.
(108) The interior surface of the pH protective optionally can have a contact angle (with distilled water) of from 90° to 110°, optionally from 80° to 120°, optionally from 70° to 130°, as measured by Goniometer Angle measurement of a water droplet on the pH protective surface, per ASTM D7334-08 “Standard Practice for Surface Wettability of Coatings, Substrates and Pigments by Advancing Contact Angle Measurement,”
(109) Optionally an FTIR absorbance spectrum of the pH protective coating or layer 286 of any embodiment has a ratio greater than 0.75 between the maximum amplitude of the Si—O—Si symmetrical stretch peak normally located between about 1000 and 1040 cm-1, and the maximum amplitude of the Si—O—Si assymmetric stretch peak normally located between about 1060 and about 1100 cm-1. Alternatively in any embodiment, this ratio can be at least 0.8, or at least 0.9, or at least 1.0, or at least 1.1, or at least 1.2. Alternatively in any embodiment, this ratio can be at most 1.7, or at most 1.6, or at most 1.5, or at most 1.4, or at most 1.3. Any minimum ratio stated here can be combined with any maximum ratio stated here, as an alternative embodiment of the invention of
(110) Optionally, in any embodiment the pH protective coating or layer 286, in the absence of the medicament, has a non-oily appearance. This appearance has been observed in some instances to distinguish an effective pH protective coating or layer from a lubricity layer, which in some instances has been observed to have an oily (i.e. shiny) appearance.
(111) Optionally, for the pH protective coating or layer 286 in any embodiment, the silicon dissolution rate by a 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer diluted in water for injection, adjusted to pH 8 with concentrated nitric acid, and containing 0.2 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant, (measured in the absence of the medicament, to avoid changing the dissolution reagent), at 40° C., is less than 170 ppb/day. (Polysorbate-80 is a common ingredient of pharmaceutical preparations, available for example as Tween®-80 from Uniqema Americas LLC, Wilmington Del.)
(112) Optionally, for the pH protective coating or layer 286 in any embodiment, the silicon dissolution rate is less than 160 ppb/day, or less than 140 ppb/day, or less than 120 ppb/day, or less than 100 ppb/day, or less than 90 ppb/day, or less than 80 ppb/day. Optionally, in any embodiment of
(113) Optionally, for the pH protective coating or layer 286 in any embodiment the total silicon content of the pH protective coating or layer and barrier coating, upon dissolution into a test composition with a pH of 8 from the vessel, is less than 66 ppm, or less than 60 ppm, or less than 50 ppm, or less than 40 ppm, or less than 30 ppm, or less than 20 ppm.
(114) The pH protective coating or layer 286 has an interior surface facing the lumen 212 and an outer surface facing the interior surface of the barrier coating or layer 288. Optionally, the pH protective coating or layer 286 is at least coextensive with the barrier coating or layer 288. The pH protective coating or layer 286 alternatively can be less extensive than the barrier coating, as when the fluid does not contact or seldom is in contact with certain parts of the barrier coating absent the pH protective coating or layer. The pH protective coating or layer 286 alternatively can be more extensive than the barrier coating, as it can cover areas that are not provided with a barrier coating.
(115) The pH protective coating or layer 286 optionally can be applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) of a precursor feed comprising an acyclic siloxane, a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, a silatrane, a silquasilatrane, a silproatrane, an azasilatrane, an azasilquasiatrane, an azasilproatrane, or a combination of any two or more of these precursors. Some particular, non-limiting precursors contemplated for such use include octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS).
(116) Optionally, an FTIR absorbance spectrum of the pH protective coating or layer 286 has a ratio greater than 0.75 between the maximum amplitude of the Si—O—Si symmetrical stretch peak between about 1000 and 1040 cm.sup.−1, and the maximum amplitude of the Si—O—Si assymmetric stretch peak between about 1060 and about 1100 cm.sup.−1.
(117) In the presence of a fluid composition having a pH between 5 and 9 contained in the lumen 212, the calculated shelf life of the vessel 210 is more than six months at a storage temperature of 4° C. Optionally, the rate of erosion of the pH protective coating or layer 286, if directly contacted by a fluid composition having a pH of 8, is less than 20% optionally less than 15%, optionally less than 10%, optionally less than 7%, optionally from 5% to 20%, optionally 5% to 15%, optionally 5% to 10%, optionally 5% to 7%, of the rate of erosion of the barrier coating or layer 288, if directly contacted by the same fluid composition under the same conditions. Optionally, the fluid composition removes the pH protective coating or layer 286 at a rate of 1 nm or less of pH protective coating or layer thickness per 44 hours of contact with the fluid composition.
(118) Optionally, the silicon dissolution rate of the pH protective coating or layer and barrier coating or layer by a 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer diluted in water for injection, adjusted to pH 8 with concentrated nitric acid, and containing 0.2 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant from the vessel is less than 170 parts per billion (ppb)/day.
(119) Optionally, the total silicon content of the pH protective coating or layer 286 and the barrier coating or layer 288, upon dissolution into 0.1 N potassium hydroxide aqueous solution at 40° C. from the vessel, is less than 66 ppm.
(120) Optionally, the calculated shelf life of the vessel 210 (total Si/Si dissolution rate) is more than 2 years.
(121) Optionally, the pH protective coating or layer 286 shows an O-Parameter measured with attenuated total reflection (ATR) of less than 0.4, measured as:
(122)
(123) The O-Parameter is defined in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070, which claims an O-parameter value of most broadly from 0.4 to 0.9. It can be measured from physical analysis of an FTIR amplitude versus wave number plot to find the numerator and denominator of the above expression, as shown in
(124) U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070 asserts that the claimed O-parameter range provides a superior pH protective coating or layer, relying on experiments only with HMDSO and HMDSN, which are both non-cyclic siloxanes. Surprisingly, it has been found by the present inventors that 0-parameters outside the ranges claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070 provide even better results than are obtained in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070. Alternatively in the embodiment of
(125) Optionally, the pH protective coating or layer shows an N-Parameter measured with attenuated total reflection (ATR) of less than 0.7, measured as:
(126)
(127) The N-Parameter is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070, and is measured analogously to the O-Parameter except that intensities at two specific wave numbers are used—neither of these wave numbers is a range. U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070 claims a passivation layer with an N-Parameter of 0.7 to 1.6. Again, the present inventors have made better coatings employing a pH protective coating or layer 286 having an N-Parameter lower than 0.7, as described above. Alternatively, the N-parameter has a value of at least 0.3, or from 0.4 to 0.6, or at least 0.53.
(128) The protective coating or layer of Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.y or its equivalent SiO.sub.xC.sub.y also can have utility as a hydrophobic layer, independent of whether it also functions as a pH protective coating or layer. Suitable hydrophobic coatings or layers and their application, properties, and use are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188. Dual functional protective/hydrophobic coatings or layers having the properties of both types of coatings or layers can be provided for any embodiment of the present invention.
(129) Graded Composite Layer
(130) Another expedient contemplated here, for adjacent layers of SiO.sub.x and a pH protective coating or layer, is a graded composite of any two or more adjacent PECVD layers, for example the barrier coating or layer 288 and a pH protective coating or layer 286 and/or a lubricity coating or layer 281. A graded composite can be separate layers of a protective and/or barrier layer or coating with a transition or interface of intermediate composition between them, or separate layers of a protective and/or hydrophobic layer and SiO.sub.x with an intermediate distinct pH protective coating or layer of intermediate composition between them, or a single coating or layer that changes continuously or in steps from a composition of a protective and/or hydrophobic layer to a composition more like SiO.sub.x, going through the primer coating or layer in a normal direction.
(131) The grade in the graded composite can go in either direction. For example, the composition of SiO.sub.x can be applied directly to the substrate and graduate to a composition further from the surface of a primer coating or layer, and optionally can further graduate to another type of coating or layer, such as a hydrophobic coating or layer or a lubricity coating or layer. Additionally, in any embodiment an adhesion coating or layer, for example Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.y, or its equivalent SiO.sub.xC.sub.y, optionally can be applied directly to the substrate before applying the barrier layer. A graduated primer coating or layer is particularly contemplated if a layer of one composition is better for adhering to the substrate than another, in which case the better-adhering composition can, for example, be applied directly to the substrate. It is contemplated that the more distant portions of the graded primer coating or layer can be less compatible with the substrate than the adjacent portions of the graded primer coating or layer, since at any point the primer coating or layer is changing gradually in properties, so adjacent portions at nearly the same depth of the primer coating or layer have nearly identical composition, and more widely physically separated portions at substantially different depths can have more diverse properties. It is also contemplated that a primer coating or layer portion that forms a better barrier against transfer of material to or from the substrate can be directly against the substrate, to prevent the more remote primer coating or layer portion that forms a poorer barrier from being contaminated with the material intended to be barred or impeded by the barrier.
(132) The applied coatings or layers, instead of being graded, optionally can have sharp transitions between one layer and the next, without a substantial gradient of composition. Such primer coating or layer can be made, for example, by providing the gases to produce a layer as a steady state flow in a non-plasma state, then energizing the system with a brief plasma discharge to form a coating or layer on the substrate. If a subsequent primer coating or layer is to be applied, the gases for the previous primer coating or layer are cleared out and the gases for the next primer coating or layer are applied in a steady-state fashion before energizing the plasma and again forming a distinct layer on the surface of the substrate or its outermost previous primer coating or layer, with little if any gradual transition at the interface.
(133) An embodiment can be carried out under conditions effective to form a hydrophobic pH protective coating or layer on the substrate. Optionally, the hydrophobic characteristics of the pH protective coating or layer can be set by setting the ratio of the O2 to the organosilicon precursor in the gaseous reactant, and/or by setting the electric power used for generating the plasma. Optionally, the pH protective coating or layer can have a lower wetting tension than the uncoated surface, optionally a wetting tension of from 20 to 72 dyne/cm, optionally from 30 to 60 dynes/cm, optionally from 30 to 40 dynes/cm, optionally 34 dyne/cm. Optionally, the pH protective coating or layer can be more hydrophobic than the uncoated surface.
(134) Equipment
(135) PECVD Apparatus for Forming PECVD Coating or Layer
(136) PECVD apparatus, a system and precursor materials suitable for applying any of the PECVD coatings or layers described in this specification, specifically including the tie coating or layer 289, the barrier coating or layer 288, or the pH protective coating or layer 286 is described in described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188, which is incorporated by reference.
(137) An overview of these conditions is provided in
(138) The vessels can then be conveyed to a barrier coater 304, which is suitable apparatus for applying a barrier coating or layer to the interior surface of the wall, such as the PECVD apparatus described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188.
(139) The vessels can then be conveyed to a pH protective coater 306, which is suitable apparatus for applying a pH protective coating or layer to the interior surface of the wall, such as the PECVD apparatus described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188. This then completes the coating set.
(140) Optionally, further steps can be carried out by the system. For example, the coated vessels can be conveyed to a fluid filler 308 which places fluid from a fluid supply 310 into the lumens of the coated vessels.
(141) For another example the filled vessels can be conveyed to a closure installer 312, which takes closures, for example plungers or stoppers, from a closure supply 314 and seats them in the lumens of the coated vessels.
(142) In any embodiment of the invention, the tie coating or layer optionally can be applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).
(143) In any embodiment of the invention, the barrier coating or layer optionally can be applied by PECVD.
(144) In any embodiment of the invention, the pH protective coating or layer optionally can be applied by PECVD.
(145) In any embodiment of the invention, the vessel can comprise or consist of a syringe barrel, a vial, cartridge or a blister package.
(146) Reaction conditions for forming the SiO.sub.x barrier layer are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188, which is incorporated by reference.
(147) The tie or adhesion coating or layer can be produced, for example, using as the precursor tetramethyldisiloxane (TMDSO) or hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) at a flow rate of 0.5 to 10 sccm, preferably 1 to 5 sccm; oxygen flow of 0.25 to 5 sccm, preferably 0.5 to 2.5 sccm; and argon flow of 1 to 120 sccm, preferably in the upper part of this range for a 1 mL syringe and the lower part of this range for a 5 ml. vial. The overall pressure in the vessel during PECVD can be from 0.01 to 10 Torr, preferably from 0.1 to 1.5 Torr. The power level applied can be from 5 to 100 Watts, preferably in the upper part of this range for a 1 mL syringe and the lower part of this range for a 5 ml. vial. The deposition time (i.e. “on” time for RF power) is from 0.1 to 10 seconds, preferably 1 to 3 seconds. The power cycle optionally can be ramped or steadily increased from 0 Watts to full power over a short time period, such as 2 seconds, when the power is turned on, which may improve the plasma uniformity. The ramp up of power over a period of time is optional, however.
(148) The pH protective coating or layer 286 coating or layer described in this specification can be applied in many different ways. For one example, the low-pressure PECVD process described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188 can be used. For another example, instead of using low-pressure PECVD, atmospheric PECVD can be employed to deposit the pH protective coating or layer. For another example, the coating can be simply evaporated and allowed to deposit on the SiO.sub.x layer to be protected. For another example, the coating can be sputtered on the SiO.sub.x layer to be protected. For still another example, the pH protective coating or layer 286 can be applied from a liquid medium used to rinse or wash the SiO.sub.x layer.
(149) Other precursors and methods can be used to apply the pH protective coating or layer or passivating treatment. For example, hexamethylene disilazane (HMDZ) can be used as the precursor. HMDZ has the advantage of containing no oxygen in its molecular structure. This passivation treatment is contemplated to be a surface treatment of the SiO.sub.x barrier layer with HMDZ. To slow down and/or eliminate the decomposition of the silicon dioxide coatings at silanol bonding sites, the coating must be passivated. It is contemplated that passivation of the surface with HMDZ (and optionally application of a few mono layers of the HMDZ-derived coating) will result in a toughening of the surface against dissolution, resulting in reduced decomposition. It is contemplated that HMDZ will react with the —OH sites that are present in the silicon dioxide coating, resulting in the evolution of NH3 and bonding of S—(CH3)3 to the silicon (it is contemplated that hydrogen atoms will be evolved and bond with nitrogen from the HMDZ to produce NH3).
(150) It is contemplated that this HMDZ passivation can be accomplished through several possible paths.
(151) One contemplated path is dehydration/vaporization of the HMDZ at ambient temperature. First, an SiO.sub.x surface is deposited, for example using hexamethylene disiloxane (HMDSO). The as-coated silicon dioxide surface is then reacted with HMDZ vapor. In an embodiment, as soon as the SiO.sub.x surface is deposited onto the article of interest, the vacuum is maintained. The HMDSO and oxygen are pumped away and a base vacuum is achieved. Once base vacuum is achieved, HMDZ vapor is flowed over the surface of the silicon dioxide (as coated on the part of interest) at pressures from the mTorr range to many Torr. The HMDZ is then pumped away (with the resulting NH3 that is a byproduct of the reaction). The amount of NH3 in the gas stream can be monitored (with a residual gas analyzer—RGA—as an example) and when there is no more NH3 detected, the reaction is complete. The part is then vented to atmosphere (with a clean dry gas or nitrogen). The resulting surface is then found to have been passivated. It is contemplated that this method optionally can be accomplished without forming a plasma.
(152) Alternatively, after formation of the SiO.sub.x barrier coating or layer, the vacuum can be broken before dehydration/vaporization of the HMDZ. Dehydration/vaporization of the HMDZ can then be carried out in either the same apparatus used for formation of the SiO.sub.x barrier coating or layer or different apparatus.
(153) Dehydration/vaporization of HMDZ at an elevated temperature is also contemplated. The above process can alternatively be carried out at an elevated temperature exceeding room temperature up to about 150° C. The maximum temperature is determined by the material from which the coated part is constructed. An upper temperature should be selected that will not distort or otherwise damage the part being coated.
(154) Dehydration/vaporization of HMDZ with a plasma assist is also contemplated. After carrying out any of the above embodiments of dehydration/vaporization, once the HMDZ vapor is admitted into the part, a plasma is generated. The plasma power can range from a few watts to 100+ watts (similar powers as used to deposit the SiO.sub.x). The above is not limited to HMDZ and could be applicable to any molecule that will react with hydrogen, for example any of the nitrogen-containing precursors described in this specification.
(155) Another way of applying the pH protective coating or layer is to apply as the pH protective coating or layer an amorphous carbon or fluorocarbon coating, or a combination of the two.
(156) Amorphous carbon coatings can be formed by PECVD using a saturated hydrocarbon, (e.g. methane or propane) or an unsaturated hydrocarbon (e.g. ethylene, acetylene) as a precursor for plasma polymerization. Fluorocarbon coatings can be derived from fluorocarbons (for example, hexafluoroethylene or tetrafluoroethylene). Either type of coating, or a combination of both, can be deposited by vacuum PECVD or atmospheric pressure PECVD. It is contemplated that that an amorphous carbon and/or fluorocarbon coating will provide better passivation of an SiO.sub.x barrier layer than a siloxane coating since an amorphous carbon and/or fluorocarbon coating will not contain silanol bonds.
(157) It is further contemplated that fluorosilicon precursors can be used to provide a pH protective coating or layer over an SiO.sub.x barrier layer. This can be carried out by using as a precursor a fluorinated silane precursor such as hexafluorosilane and a PECVD process. The resulting coating would also be expected to be a non-wetting coating.
(158) It is further contemplated that any embodiment of the pH protective coating or layer processes described in this specification can also be carried out without using the article to be coated to contain the plasma. For example, external surfaces of medical articles, for example catheters, surgical instruments, closures, and others can be protected or passivated by sputtering the coating, employing a radio frequency target.
(159) Yet another coating modality contemplated for protecting or passivating an SiO.sub.x barrier layer is coating the barrier layer using a polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin resin. For example, the barrier coated part can be dip coated in a fluid polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin resin melt, solution or dispersion and cured by autoclaving or other heating at a temperature between 60 and 100° C. It is contemplated that a coating of polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin resin can be preferentially used in aqueous environments between pH 5-8, as such resins are known to provide high wet strength in paper in that pH range. Wet strength is the ability to maintain mechanical strength of paper subjected to complete water soaking for extended periods of time, so it is contemplated that a coating of polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin resinon an SiO.sub.x barrier layer will have similar resistance to dissolution in aqueous media. It is also contemplated that, because polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin resin imparts a lubricity improvement to paper, it will also provide lubricity in the form of a coating on a thermoplastic surface made of, for example, COC or COP.
(160) Even another approach for protecting an SiO.sub.x layer is to apply as a pH protective coating or layer a liquid-applied coating of a polyfluoroalkyl ether, followed by atmospheric plasma curing the pH protective coating or layer. For example, it is contemplated that the process practiced under the trademark TriboGlide®, described in this specification, can be used to provide a pH protective coating or layer that is also a lubricity layer, as TriboGlide® is conventionally used to provide lubricity.
(161) Exemplary PECVD reaction conditions for preparing a pH protective coating or layer 286 in a 3 ml sample size syringe with a ⅛″ diameter tube (open at the end) are as follows:
(162) For depositing a pH protective coating or layer, a precursor feed or process gas can be employed having a standard volume ratio of, for example: from 0.5 to 10 standard volumes, optionally from 1 to 6 standard volumes, optionally from 2 to 4 standard volumes, optionally equal to or less than 6 standard volumes, optionally equal to or less than 2.5 standard volumes, optionally equal to or less than 1.5 standard volumes, optionally equal to or less than 1.25 standard volumes of the precursor, for example OMCTS or one of the other precursors of any embodiment; from 0 to 100 standard volumes, optionally from 1 to 200 standard volumes, optionally from 1 to 80 standard volumes, optionally from 5 to 100 standard volumes, optionally from 10 to 70 standard volumes, of a carrier gas of any embodiment, for example argon. from 0.1 to 10 standard volumes, optionally from 0.1 to 2 standard volumes, optionally from 0.2 to 1.5 standard volumes, optionally from 0.2 to 1 standard volumes, optionally from 0.5 to 1.5 standard volumes, optionally from 0.8 to 1.2 standard volumes of an oxidizing agent.
The power level can be, for example, from 0.1-500 watts.
Specific Flow rates and power levels contemplated include:
OMCTS: 2.0 sccm
Oxygen: 0.7 sccm
Argon: 7.0 sccm
Power: 3.5 watts
PECVD Process for Trilayer Coating
(163) Other general coating parameter ranges, with preferred ranges in parentheses, for a trilayer coating for a 1 mL syringe barrel are shown in the PECVD Trilayer Process General Parameters Tables (1 mL syringe and 5 mL vial).
(164) TABLE-US-00002 PECVD Trilayer Process General Parameters Table (1 mL syringe) Parameter Units Tie Barrier pH Protective Power W 40-90 140 40-90 (60-80) (60-80) TMDSO Flow sccm 1-10 None 1-10 (3-5) (3-5) HMDSO Flow sccm None 1.56 None O.sub.2 Flow sccm 0.5-5 20 0.5-5 (1.5-2.5) (1.5-2.5) Argon Flow sccm 40-120 0 40-120 (70-90) (70-90) Ramp Time seconds None None None Deposition seconds 0.1-10 20 0.1-40 Time (1-3) (15-25) Tube Pressure Torr 0.01-10 0.59 0.01-10 (0.1-1.5) (0.1-1.5)
(165) TABLE-US-00003 PECVD Trilayer Process General Parameters Table (5 mL vial) Parameter Units Adhesion Barrier Protection Power W 40-90 140 40-90 (60-80) (60-80) TMDSO Flow sccm 1-10 None 1-10 (3-5) (3-5) HMDSO Flow sccm None 1.56 None O.sub.2 Flow sccm 0.5-5 20 0.5-5 (1.5-2.5) (1.5-2.5) Argon Flow sccm 40-120 0 40-120 (70-90) (70-90) Ramp Time seconds None None None Deposition Time seconds 0.1-10 20 0.1-40 (1-3) (15-25) Tube Pressure Torr 0.01-10 0.59 0.01-10 (0.1-1.5) (0.1-1.5)
(166) Examples of specific coating parameters that have been used for a 1 mL syringe and 5 mL vial are shown in the PECVD Trilayer Process Specific Parameters Tables (1 mL syringe and 5 mL vial):
(167) TABLE-US-00004 PECVD Trilayer Process Specific Parameters Table (1 mL syringe) Parameter Units Tie Barrier Protection Power W 70 140 70 TMDSO Flow sccm 4 None 4 HMDSO Flow sccm None 1.56 None O.sub.2 Flow sccm 2 20 2 Argon Flow sccm 80 0 80 Ramp Time seconds None None None Deposition Time seconds 2.5 20 10 Tube Pressure Torr 1 0.59 1
(168) TABLE-US-00005 PECVD Trilayer Process Specific Parameters Table (5 mL vial) Parameter Units Adhesion Barrier Protection Power W 20 40 20 TMDSO sccm 2 0 2 Flow HMDSO sccm 0 3 0 Flow O.sub.2 Flow sccm 1 50 1 Argon Flow sccm 20 0 20 Ramp Time seconds 0 2 2 Deposition seconds 2.5 10 10 Time Tube Torr 0.85 1.29 0.85 Pressure
(169) The O-parameter and N-parameter values for the pH protective coating or layer applied to the 1 mL syringe as described above are 0.34 and 0.55, respectively.
(170) The O-parameter and N-parameter values for the pH protective coating or layer applied to the 5 mL vial are 0.24 and 0.63, respectively.
(171) Vessels Generally
(172) A vessel with a primer coating or layer as described herein and/or prepared according to a method described herein can be used for reception and/or storage and/or delivery of a compound or composition. The compound or composition can be sensitive, for example air-sensitive, oxygen-sensitive, sensitive to humidity and/or sensitive to mechanical influences. It can be a biologically active compound or composition, for example a pharmaceutical preparation or medicament like insulin or a composition comprising insulin. In another aspect, it can be a biological fluid, optionally a bodily fluid, for example blood or a blood fraction. In certain aspects of the present invention, the compound or composition can be a product to be administrated to a subject in need thereof, for example a product to be injected, like blood (as in transfusion of blood from a donor to a recipient or reintroduction of blood from a patient back to the patient) or insulin.
(173) A vessel with a primer coating or layer as described herein and/or prepared according to a method described herein can further be used for protecting a compound or composition contained in its interior space against mechanical and/or chemical effects of the surface of the vessel material. For example, it can be used for preventing or reducing precipitation and/or clotting or platelet activation of the compound or a component of the composition, for example insulin precipitation or blood clotting or platelet activation.
(174) It can further be used for protecting a compound or composition contained in its interior against the environment outside of the pharmaceutical package or other vessel, for example by preventing or reducing the entry of one or more compounds from the environment surrounding the vessel into the interior space of the vessel. Such environmental compound can be a gas or liquid, for example an atmospheric gas or liquid containing oxygen, air, and/or water vapor.
(175) A vessel with a primer coating or layer as described herein can also be evacuated and stored in an evacuated state. For example, the primer coating or layer allows better maintenance of the vacuum in comparison to a corresponding vessel without a primer coating or layer. In one aspect of this embodiment, the vessel with a primer coating or layer is a blood collection tube. The tube can also contain an agent for preventing blood clotting or platelet activation, for example EDTA or heparin.
(176) Any of the above-described embodiments can be made, for example, by providing as the vessel a length of tubing from about 1 cm to about 200 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 150 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 120 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 100 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 80 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 60 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 40 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 30 cm long, and processing it with a probe electrode as described below. Particularly for the longer lengths in the above ranges, it is contemplated that relative motion between the probe and the vessel can be useful during primer coating or layer formation. This can be done, for example, by moving the vessel with respect to the probe or moving the probe with respect to the vessel.
(177) In these embodiments, it is contemplated that the barrier coating or layer can be thinner or less complete than would be preferred to provide the high gas barrier integrity needed in an evacuated blood collection tube. In these embodiments, it is contemplated that the primer coating or layer can be thinner or less complete than would be preferred to provide the long shelf life needed to store a liquid material in contact with the barrier layer for an extended period.
(178) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel has a central axis.
(179) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel wall is sufficiently flexible to be flexed at least once at 20° C., without breaking the wall, over a range from at least substantially straight to a bending radius at the central axis of not more than 100 times as great as the outer diameter of the vessel.
(180) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the bending radius at the central axis is not more than 90 times as great as, or not more than 80 times as great as, or not more than 70 times as great as, or not more than 60 times as great as, or not more than 50 times as great as, or not more than 40 times as great as, or not more than 30 times as great as, or not more than 20 times as great as, or not more than 10 times as great as, or not more than 9 times as great as, or not more than 8 times as great as, or not more than 7 times as great as, or not more than 6 times as great as, or not more than 5 times as great as, or not more than 4 times as great as, or not more than 3 times as great as, or not more than 2 times as great as, or not more than, the outer diameter of the vessel.
(181) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel wall can be a fluid-contacting surface made of flexible material.
(182) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel lumen can be the fluid flow passage of a pump.
(183) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel can be a blood bag adapted to maintain blood in good condition for medical use.
(184) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the polymeric material can be a silicone elastomer or a thermoplastic polyurethane, as two examples, or any material suitable for contact with blood, or with insulin.
(185) In an optional embodiment, the vessel has an inner diameter of at least 2 mm, or at least 4 mm.
(186) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel is a tube.
(187) As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the lumen has at least two open ends.
(188) Pharmaceutical Package
(189) The vessel 210 illustrated most broadly by
(190)
(191) Optionally for any of the embodiments of
(192) Optionally for any of the embodiments of
(193) Optionally for any of the embodiments of
(194) Optionally for any of the embodiments of
(195) Referring to
(196) Optionally, a hydrophilic further primer layer of SiO.sub.x can be applied on top of the primer coating or layer 286 made of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y or SiN.sub.xC.sub.y. Although the portions of this further primer layer exposed to the fluid 218 will erode, if the pH is high enough, the portions of this further primer layer protected by the plunger seal(s) from the fluid 218 will remain in place and further reduce the Fi experienced when the syringe is used.
(197) Optionally for any of the embodiments of
(198) Optionally for any of the embodiments of
(199) Optionally, in any embodiment of
(200) Any minimum time stated here can be combined with any maximum time stated here, as an alternative embodiment of the invention of
(201) Optionally for any of the embodiments of
(202) Examples of suitable inhalation anesthetics to be contained in the lumen 212 of
(203) Examples of suitable injectable drugs to be contained in the lumen 212 of
(204) Examples of suitable liquid drugs (non-injectable) to be contained in the lumen 212 of
(205) Examples of suitable drug classes to be contained in the lumen 212 of
(206) Examples of suitable diagnostic tests to be contained in the lumen 212 of
(207) Even another embodiment is a medical or diagnostic kit including a vessel having a pH protective coating or layer as defined in any embodiment herein on a substrate as defined in any embodiment above. Optionally, the kit additionally includes a medicament or diagnostic agent which is contained in the vessel; and/or a hypodermic needle, double-ended needle, or other delivery conduit; and/or an instruction sheet.
(208) Vessel Containing Viable Blood, Having a Primer Coating or Layer Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor
(209) Even another embodiment is a blood containing vessel. Several non-limiting examples of such a vessel are a blood transfusion bag, a blood sample collection vessel in which a sample has been collected, the tubing of a heart-lung machine, a flexible-walled blood collection bag, or tubing used to collect a patient's blood during surgery and reintroduce the blood into the patient's vasculature. If the vessel includes a pump for pumping blood, a particularly suitable pump is a centrifugal pump or a peristaltic pump. The vessel has a wall; the wall has an inner or interior surface defining a lumen. The inner or interior surface of the wall has an at least partial primer coating or layer of a protective layer, which optionally also presents a hydrophobic surface. The primer coating or layer can be as thin as monomolecular thickness or as thick as about 1000 nm. The vessel contains blood viable for return to the vascular system of a patient disposed within the lumen in contact with the hydrophobic layer.
(210) An embodiment is a blood containing vessel including a wall and having an inner or interior surface defining a lumen. The inner or interior surface has an at least partial primer coating or layer that optionally also presents a hydrophobic surface. The primer coating or layer can also comprise or consist essentially of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y where x and y are as defined in this specification. The thickness of the hydrophobic coating or layer is within the range from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner or interior surface. The vessel contains blood viable for return to the vascular system of a patient disposed within the lumen in contact with the hydrophobic coating or layer.
(211) Primer Coating or Layer Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor Reduces Clotting or Platelet Activation of Blood in the Vessel
(212) Another embodiment is a vessel having a wall. The wall has an inner or interior surface defining a lumen and has an at least partial primer coating or layer that presents a hydrophobic surface, where optionally x and y are as previously defined. The thickness of the primer coating or layer is from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner or interior surface. The primer coating or layer is effective to reduce the clotting or platelet activation of blood exposed to the inner or interior surface, compared to the same type of wall uncoated with a hydrophobic layer.
(213) It is contemplated that the incorporation of a hydrophobic layer will reduce the adhesion or clot forming tendency of the blood, as compared to its properties in contact with an unmodified polymeric or SiO.sub.x surface. This property is contemplated to reduce or potentially eliminate the need for treating the blood with heparin, as by reducing the necessary blood concentration of heparin in a patient undergoing surgery of a type requiring blood to be removed from the patient and then returned to the patient, as when using a heart-lung machine during cardiac surgery. It is contemplated that this will reduce the complications of surgery involving the passage of blood through such a pharmaceutical package or other vessel, by reducing the bleeding complications resulting from the use of heparin.
(214) Another embodiment is a vessel including a wall and having an inner or interior surface defining a lumen. The inner or interior surface has an at least partial primer coating or layer that presents a hydrophobic surface, the thickness of the primer coating or layer being from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner or interior surface, the primer coating or layer being effective to reduce the clotting or platelet activation of blood exposed to the inner or interior surface.
(215) Vessel Containing Viable Blood, Having a Primer Coating or Layer of Group III or IV Element
(216) Another embodiment is a blood containing vessel having a wall having an inner or interior surface defining a lumen. The inner or interior surface has an at least partial primer coating or layer of a composition comprising one or more elements of Group III, one or more elements of Group IV, or a combination of two or more of these. The thickness of the primer coating or layer is between monomolecular thickness and about 1000 nm thick, inclusive, on the inner or interior surface. The vessel contains blood viable for return to the vascular system of a patient disposed within the lumen in contact with the primer coating or layer.
(217) Primer Coating or Layer of Group III or IV Element Reduces Clotting or Platelet Activation of Blood in the Vessel
(218) Optionally, in the vessel of the preceding paragraph, the primer coating or layer of the Group III or IV Element is effective to reduce the clotting or platelet activation of blood exposed to the inner or interior surface of the vessel wall.
(219) Insulin Vessel
(220) As one option, the compound or a component of the composition is insulin, and precipitation of the insulin is prevented or reduced. As another option, the compound or a component of the composition is blood or a blood fraction, and blood clotting or platelet activation is prevented or reduced. As still another option, the vessel with a primer coating or layer is a blood collection tube. Optionally, the blood collection tube can contain an agent for preventing blood clotting or platelet activation, for example ethylenediamineteetraacetic acid (EDTA), a sodium salt thereof, or heparin.
(221) The use of a coated substrate according to any described embodiment is contemplated for storing insulin.
(222) Protocols and Test Methods
(223) Atomic Composition
(224) The atomic compositions of the tie coating or layer, the barrier coating or layer, and the pH protective coating or layer are characterized using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), to measure silicon, oxygen, and carbon, and either Rutherford backscattering (RBS) or hydrogen forward scattering (HFS) spectrometry to measure hydrogen. A separate analytical method is used to determine the hydrogen content because XPS does not detect hydrogen. The following methods are used, unless otherwise expressly indicated.
(225) XPS Protocol
(226) XPS data is quantified using relative sensitivity factors and a model that assumes a homogeneous layer. The analysis volume is the product of the analysis area (spot size or aperture size) and the depth of information. Photoelectrons are generated within the X-ray penetration depth (typically many microns), but only the photoelectrons within the top three photoelectron escape depths are detected. Escape depths are on the order of 15-35 Å, which leads to an analysis depth of −50-100 Å. Typically, 95% of the signal originates from within this depth.
(227) The following analytical parameters are used: Instrument: PHI Quantum 2000 X-ray source: Monochromated Alka 1486.6 eV Acceptance Angle+23° Take-off angle 45° Analysis area 600 μm Charge Correction C1s 284.8 eV Ion Gun Conditions Ar+, 1 keV, 2×2 mm raster Sputter Rate 15.6 Å/min (SiO2 Equivalent)
(228) Values given are normalized to 100 percent using the elements detected. Detection limits are approximately 0.05 to 1.0 atomic percent.
(229) Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS)
(230) RBS spectra are acquired at a backscattering angle of 160° and an appropriate grazing angle (with the sample oriented perpendicular to the incident ion beam). The sample is rotated or tilted with a small angle to present a random geometry to the incident beam. This avoids channeling in both the film and the substrate. The use of two detector angles can significantly improve the measurement accuracy for composition when thin surface layers need to be analyzed.
(231) When a thin (<100 nm) amorphous or polycrystalline film resides on a single crystal substrate “ion channeling” may be utilized to reduce the backscattering signal from the substrate. This results in improved accuracy in the composition of layers containing elements that overlay with the substrate signal, typically light elements such as oxygen, nitrogen and carbon.
(232) Analytical Parameters: RBS
(233) He++ Ion Beam Energy 2.275 MeV Normal Detector Angle 160° Grazing Detector Angle −100° Analysis Mode CC RR
(234) Spectra are fit by applying a theoretical layer model and iteratively adjusting elemental concentrations and thickness until good agreement is found between the theoretical and the experimental spectra.
(235) Hydrogen Forward Scattering Spectrometry (HFS)
(236) In an HFS experiment a detector is placed 30° from the forward trajectory of the incident He++ ion beam and the sample is rotated so that the incident beam strikes the surfaces 75° from normal. In this geometry it is possible to collect light atoms, namely hydrogen, forward-scattered from a sample after collisions with the probing He++ ion beam. A thin absorber foil is placed over the detector to filter out He++ ions that are also forward scattered from the sample.
(237) Hydrogen concentrations are determined by comparing the number of hydrogen counts obtained from reference samples after normalizing by the stopping powers of the different materials. A hydrogen implanted silicon sample and a geological sample, muscovite, are used as references. The hydrogen concentration in the hydrogen implanted silicon sample is taken to be its stated implant dose of 1.6×1017±0.2×1017 atoms/cm.sup.2. The muscovite (MUSC) sample is known to have ˜6.5±0.5 atomic percent hydrogen.
(238) Samples are checked for hydrogen loss in the analyzed region. This is done by acquiring spectra for different acquisition times (initially a short exposure followed by a longer exposure to the He++ beam). Charge accumulations for 5 and 40 μC are used. A lower proportional signal in the 40 μC spectrum indicates hydrogen loss. In those cases the shorter exposure is chosen for analysis at the expense of higher noise in the spectrum. To account for surface hydrogen due to residual moisture or hydrocarbon adsorption a silicon control sample is analyzed together with the actual samples and the hydrogen signal from the control sample is subtracted from each of the spectra obtained from the actual samples. During the HFS acquisition backscattering spectra are acquired using the 160° angle detector (with the sample in forward scattering orientation). The RBS spectra are used to normalize the total charge delivered to the sample.
(239) Analytical Parameters: HFS
(240) He++ Ion Beam Energy 2.275 MeV Normal Detector Angle 160° Grazing Detector Angle −30° Ion Beam to Sample Normal 75°
Protocol for Total Silicon Measurement
(241) This protocol is used to determine the total amount of silicon coatings present on the entire vessel wall. A supply of 0.1 N potassium hydroxide (KOH) aqueous solution is prepared, taking care to avoid contact between the solution or ingredients and glass. The water used is purified water, 18 MΩ quality. A Perkin Elmer Optima Model 7300DV ICP-OES instrument is used for the measurement except as otherwise indicated.
(242) Each device (vial, syringe, tube, or the like) to be tested and its cap and crimp (in the case of a vial) or other closure are weighed empty to 0.001 g, then filled completely with the KOH solution (with no headspace), capped, crimped, and reweighed to 0.001 g. In a digestion step, each vial is placed in an autoclave oven (liquid cycle) at 121° C. for 1 hour. The digestion step is carried out to quantitatively remove the silicon coatings from the vessel wall into the KOH solution. After this digestion step, the vials are removed from the autoclave oven and allowed to cool to room temperature. The contents of the vials are transferred into ICP tubes. The total Si concentration is run on each solution by ICP/OES following the operating procedure for the ICP/OES.
(243) The total Si concentration is reported as parts per billion of Si in the KOH solution. This concentration represents the total amount of silicon coatings that were on the vessel wall before the digestion step was used to remove it.
(244) The total Si concentration can also be determined for fewer than all the silicon layers on the vessel, as when an SiO.sub.x barrier layer is applied, an SiO.sub.xC.sub.y second layer (for example, a lubricity layer or a pH protective coating or layer) is then applied, and it is desired to know the total silicon concentration of just the SiO.sub.xC.sub.y layer. This determination is made by preparing two sets of vessels, one set to which only the SiO.sub.x layer is applied and the other set to which the same SiO.sub.x layer is applied, followed by the SiO.sub.xC.sub.y layer or other layers of interest. The total Si concentration for each set of vessels is determined in the same manner as described above. The difference between the two Si concentrations is the total Si concentration of the SiO.sub.xC.sub.y second layer.
(245) Protocol for Measuring Dissolved Silicon in a Vessel
(246) In some of the working examples, the amount of silicon dissolved from the wall of the vessel by a test solution is determined, in parts per billion (ppb), for example to evaluate the dissolution rate of the test solution. This determination of dissolved silicon is made by storing the test solution in a vessel provided with an SiO.sub.x and/or SiO.sub.xC.sub.y coating or layer under test conditions, then removing a sample of the solution from the vessel and testing the Si concentration of the sample. The test is done in the same manner as the Protocol for Total Silicon Measurement, except that the digestion step of that protocol is replaced by storage of the test solution in the vessel as described in this protocol. The total Si concentration is reported as parts per billion of Si in the test solution
(247) Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate
(248) As shown in the working examples, the silicon dissolution rate is measured by determining the total silicon leached from the vessel into its contents, and does not distinguish between the silicon derived from the pH protective coating or layer 286, the lubricity layer 281, the barrier coating or layer 288, or other materials present.
(249) The average dissolution rates reported in the working examples are determined as follows. A series of test vessels having a known total total silicon measurement are filled with the desired test solution analogous to the manner of filling the vials with the KOH solution in the Protocol for Total Silicon Measurement. (The test solution can be a physiologically inactive test solution as employed in the present working examples or a physiologically active pharmaceutical preparation intended to be stored in the vessels to form a pharmaceutical package). The test solution is stored in respective vessels for several different amounts of time, then analyzed for the Si concentration in parts per billion in the test solution for each storage time. The respective storage times and Si concentrations are then plotted. The plots are studied to find a series of substantially linear points having the steepest slope.
(250) The plot of dissolution amount (ppb Si) versus days decreases in slope with time, even though it does not appear that the Si layer has been fully digested by the test solution.
(251) For the PC194 test data in Table 10 below, linear plots of dissolution versus time data are prepared by using a least squares linear regression program to find a linear plot corresponding to the first five data points of each of the experimental plots. The slope of each linear plot is then determined and reported as representing the average dissolution rate applicable to the test, measured in parts per billion of Si dissolved in the test solution per unit of time.
(252) Protocol for Determining Calculated Shelf Life
(253) The calculated shelf life values reported in the working examples below are determined by extrapolation of the total silicon measurements and average dissolution rates, respectively determined as described in the Protocol for Total Silicon Measurement and the Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate. The assumption is made that under the indicated storage conditions the SiO.sub.xC.sub.y pH protective coating or layer will be removed at the average dissolution rate until the coating is entirely removed. Thus, the total silicon measurement for the vessel, divided by the dissolution rate, gives the period of time required for the test solution to totally dissolve the SiO.sub.xC.sub.y coating. This period of time is reported as the calculated shelf life. Unlike commercial shelf life calculations, no safety factor is calculated. Instead, the calculated shelf life is the calculated time to failure.
(254) It should be understood that because the plot of ppb Si versus hours decreases in slope with time, an extrapolation from relatively short measurement times to relatively long calculated shelf lives is believed to be a “worst case” test that tends to underestimate the calculated shelf life actually obtainable.
(255) Measurement of Coating Thickness
(256) The thickness of a PECVD coating or layer such as the pH protective coating or layer, the barrier coating or layer, the lubricity coating or layer, and/or a composite of any two or more of these layers can be measured, for example, by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). An exemplary TEM image for a pH protective coating or layer is shown in
(257) The TEM can be carried out, for example, as follows. Samples can be prepared for Focused Ion Beam (FIB) cross-sectioning in two ways. Either the samples can be first coated with a thin layer of carbon (50-100 nm thick) and then coated with a sputtered coating or layer of platinum (50-100 nm thick) using a K575X Emitech primer coating or layer system, or the samples can be coated directly with the protective sputtered Pt layer. The coated samples can be placed in an FEI FIB200 FIB system. An additional coating or layer of platinum can be FIB-deposited by injection of an organometallic gas while rastering the 30 kV gallium ion beam over the area of interest. The area of interest for each sample can be chosen to be a location half way down the length of the syringe barrel. Thin cross sections measuring approximately 15 μm (“micrometers”) long, 2 μm wide and 15 μm deep can be extracted from the die surface using an in-situ FIB lift-out technique. The cross sections can be attached to a 200 mesh copper TEM grid using FIB-deposited platinum. One or two windows in each section, measuring about 8 μm wide, can be thinned to electron transparency using the gallium ion beam of the FEI FIB.
(258) Cross-sectional image analysis of the prepared samples can be performed utilizing either a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), or a Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM), or both. All imaging data can be recorded digitally. For STEM imaging, the grid with the thinned foils can be transferred to a Hitachi HD2300 dedicated STEM. Scanning transmitted electron images can be acquired at appropriate magnifications in atomic number contrast mode (ZC) and transmitted electron mode (TE). The following instrument settings can be used.
(259) TABLE-US-00006 Scanning Transmission Electron Instrument Microscope Manufacturer/Model Hitachi HD2300 Accelerating Voltage 200 kV Objective Aperture 2 Condenser Lens 1 Setting 1.672 Condenser Lens 2 Setting 1.747 Approximate Objective Lens Setting 5.86 ZC Mode Projector Lens 1.149 TE Mode Projector Lens 0.7 Image Acquisition Pixel Resolution 1280 × 960 Acquisition Time 20 sec. (x4
(260) For TEM analysis the sample grids can be transferred to a Hitachi HF2000 transmission electron microscope. Transmitted electron images can be acquired at appropriate magnifications. The relevant instrument settings used during image acquisition can be those given below.
(261) TABLE-US-00007 Instrument Transmission Electron Microscope Manufacturer/Model Hitachi HF2000 Accelerating Voltage 200 kV Condenser Lens 1 0.78 Condenser Lens 2 0 Objective Lens 6.34 Condenser Lens Aperture 1
(262) TABLE-US-00008 Instrument Transmission Electron Microscope Objective Lens Aperture for imaging 3 Selective Area Aperture for SAD N/A
SEM Procedure
(263) SEM Sample Preparation: Each syringe sample was cut in half along its length (to expose the inner or interior surface). The top of the syringe (Luer end) was cut off to make the sample smaller.
(264) The sample was mounted onto the sample holder with conductive graphite adhesive, then put into a Denton Desk IV SEM Sample Preparation System, and a thin (approximately 50 Å) gold coating was sputtered onto the inner or interior surface of the syringe. The gold coating is used to eliminate charging of the surface during measurement.
(265) The sample was removed from the sputter system and mounted onto the sample stage of a Jeol JSM 6390 SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope). The sample was pumped down to at least 1×10-6 Torr in the sample compartment. Once the sample reached the required vacuum level, the slit valve was opened and the sample was moved into the analysis station.
(266) The sample was imaged at a coarse resolution first, then higher magnification images were accumulated. The SEM images provided in the Figures are 5 μm edge-to-edge (horizontal and vertical).
(267) AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy) Procedure.
(268) AFM images were collected using a NanoScope III Dimension 3000 machine (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, Calif., USA). The instrument was calibrated against a NIST traceable standard. Etched silicon scanning probe microscopy (SPM) tips were used. Image processing procedures involving auto-flattening, plane fitting or convolution were employed. One 10 μm×10 μm area was imaged. Roughness analyses were performed and were expressed in: (1) Root-Mean-Square Roughness, RMS; 2 Mean Roughness, Ra; and (3) Maximum Height (Peak-to-Valley), Rmax, all measured in nm (see Table 5 and
(269) Additional analysis of the 10 μm×10 μm images represented by
(270) The Digital Instruments Nanoscope III AFM/STM acquires and stores 3-dimensional representations of surfaces in a digital format. These surfaces can be analyzed in a variety of ways.
(271) The Nanoscope III software can perform a roughness analysis of any AFM or STM image. The product of this analysis is a single page reproducing the selected image in top view. To the upper right of the image is the “Image Statistics” box, which lists the calculated characteristics of the whole image minus any areas excluded by a stopband (a box with an X through it). Similar additional statistics can be calculated for a selected portion of the image and these are listed in the “Box Statistics” in the lower right portion of the page. What follows is a description and explanation of these statistics.
(272) Image Statistics:
(273) Z Range (Rp): The difference between the highest and lowest points in the image. The value is not corrected for tilt in the plane of the image; therefore, plane fitting or flattening the data will change the value.
(274) Mean: The average of all of the Z values in the imaged area. This value is not corrected for the tilt in the plane of the image; therefore, plane fitting or flattening the data will change this value.
(275) RMS (Rq): This is the standard deviation of the Z values (or RMS roughness) in the image. It is calculated according to the formula:
Rq={Σ(Z1−Zavg)2/N}
(276) where Zavg is the average Z value within the image; Z1 is the current value of Z; and N is the number of points in the image. This value is not corrected for tilt in the plane of the image; therefore, plane fitting or flattening the data will change this value.
(277) Mean roughness (Ra): This is the mean value of the surface relative to the Center Plane and is calculated using the formula:
Ra=[1/(LxLy)]∫oLy∫oLx{f(x,y)}dxdy
(278) where f(x,y) is the surface relative to the Center plane, and Lx and Ly are the dimensions of the surface.
(279) Max height (Rmax): This is the difference in height between the highest and lowest points of the surface relative to the Mean Plane.
(280) Surface area: (Optical calculation): This is the area of the 3-dimensional surface of the imaged area. It is calculated by taking the sum of the areas of the triangles formed by 3 adjacent data points throughout the image.
(281) Surface area diff: (Optional calculation) This is the amount that the Surface area is in excess of the imaged area. It is expressed as a percentage and is calculated according to the formula:
Surface area diff=100[(Surface area/S12−1]
(282) where S1 is the length (and width) of the scanned area minus any areas excluded by stopbands.
(283) Center Plane: A flat plane that is parallel to the Mean Plane. The volumes enclosed by the image surface above and below the center plane are equal.
(284) Mean Plane: The image data has a minimum variance about this flat plane. It results from a first order least squares fit on the Z data.
EXAMPLES
Examples 1-4—Conditions for Production of pH Protective Layer
(285) Some conditions used for production of pH Protective Layers are shown in Table 1.
(286) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 1 OMCTS-BASED PLASMA pH PROTECTIVE COATING OR LAYER MADE WITH CARRIER GAS pH protective protective protective Carrier pH protective pH protective coating or OMCTS O2 Gas (Ar) coating or coating or PH protective layer Time Flow Rate Flow Rate Flow Rate layer Power Example layer Type Monomer (sec) (sccm) (sccm) (sccm) (Watts) 1 Uncoated n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a (Control) COC 2 Silicon oil n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a (Industry on COC Standard) 3 L3 lubricity OMCTS 10 sec 3 0 65 6 (without coating or Oxygen) layer over SiO.sub.x on COC 4 L2 pH OMCTS 10 sec 3 1 65 6 (with protective Oxygen) coating or layer over SiO.sub.x on COC
Examples 5-8
(287) Syringe samples were produced as follows. A COC 8007 extended barrel syringe was produced according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe Barrel. An SiO.sub.x barrier coating or layer was applied to the syringe barrels according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with SiO.sub.x. A pH protective coating or layer was applied to the SiO.sub.x coated syringes according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS, modified as follows. Argon carrier gas and oxygen were used where noted in Table 2. The process conditions were set to the following, or as indicated in Table 2: OMCTS—3 sccm (when used) Argon gas—7.8 sccm (when used) Oxygen 0.38 sccm (when used) Power—3 watts Power on time—10 seconds
Syringes of Examples 5, 6, and 7 were tested to determine total extractable silicon levels (representing extraction of the organosilicon-based PECVD pH protective coating or layer) using the Protocol for Measuring Dissolved Silicon in a Vessel, modified and supplemented as shown in this example.
(288) The silicon was extracted using saline water digestion. The tip of each syringe plunger was covered with PTFE tape to prevent extracting material from the elastomeric tip material, then inserted into the syringe barrel base. The syringe barrel was filled with two milliliters of 0.9% aqueous saline solution via a hypodermic needle inserted through the Luer tip of the syringe. This is an appropriate test for extractables because many prefilled syringes are used to contain and deliver saline solution. The Luer tip was plugged with a piece of PTFE beading of appropriate diameter. The syringe was set into a PTFE test stand with the Luer tip facing up and placed in an oven at 50° C. for 72 hours.
(289) Then, either a static or a dynamic mode was used to remove the saline solution from the syringe barrel. According to the static mode indicated in Table 2, the syringe plunger was removed from the test stand, and the fluid in the syringe was decanted into a vessel. According to the dynamic mode indicated in Table 2, the Luer tip seal was removed and the plunger was depressed to push fluid through the syringe barrel and expel the contents into a vessel. In either case, the fluid obtained from each syringe barrel was brought to a volume of 50 ml using 18.2MΩ-cm deionized water and further diluted 2× to minimize sodium background during analysis. The CVH barrels contained two milliliters and the commercial barrels contained 2.32 milliliters.
(290) Next, the fluid recovered from each syringe was tested for extractable silicon using the Protocol for Measuring Dissolved Silicon in a Vessel. The instrument used was a Perkin Elmer Elan DRC II equipped with a Cetac ASX-520 autosampler. The following ICP-MS conditions were employed: Nebulizer: Quartz Meinhardt Spray Chamber: Cyclonic RF (radio frequency) power: 1550 Watts Argon (Ar) Flow: 15.0 L/min Auxiliary Ar Flow: 1.2 L/min Nebulizer Gas Flow: 0.88 L/min Integration time: 80 sec Scanning mode: Peak hopping RPq (The RPq is a rejection parameter) for Cerium as CeO (m/z 156: <2%
(291) Aliquots from aqueous dilutions obtained from Syringes E, F, and G were injected and analyzed for Si in concentration units of micrograms per liter. The results of this test are shown in Table 2. While the results are not quantitative, they do indicate that extractables from the pH protective coating or layer are not clearly higher than the extractables for the SiO.sub.x barrier layer only. Also, the static mode produced far less extractables than the dynamic mode, which was expected.
(292) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 2 OMCTS PH PROTECTIVE COATING OR LAYER (E and F) OMCTS O.sub.2 Ar Example (sccm) (sccm) (sccm) 5 3.0 0.38 7.8 6 3.0 0.38 7.8 7 n/a n/a n/a (SiO.sub.xonly) 8 n/a n/a n/a (silicon oil)
Examples 9-11
(293) Syringe Examples 9, 10, and 11, employing three different pH protective coatings or layers, were produced in the same manner as for Examples 5-8 except as follows or as indicated in Table 3: OMCTS—2.5 sccm Argon gas—7.6 sccm (when used) Oxygen 0.38 sccm (when used) Power—3 watts Power on time—10 seconds
(294) Syringe Example 9 had a three-component pH protective coating or layer employing OMCTS, oxygen, and carrier gas. Syringe Example 10 had a two component pH protective coating or layer employing OMCTS and oxygen, but no carrier gas. Syringe Example 11 had a one-component pH protective coating or layer (OMCTS only). Syringes of Examples 9-11 were then tested for lubricity as described for Examples 5-8.
(295) The pH protective coatings or layers produced according to these working examples are also contemplated to function as protective coatings or layers to increase the shelf life of the vessels, compared to similar vessels provided with a barrier coating or layer but no pH protective coating or layer.
(296) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 3 OMCTS pH protective coating or layer OMCTS -2.5 sccm Argon gas -7.6 sccm (when used) Oxygen 0.38 sccm (when used) Power - 3 watts Power on time - 10 seconds
Examples 12-14
(297) Examples 9-11 using an OMCTS precursor gas were repeated in Examples 12-14, except that HMDSO was used as the precursor in Examples 12-14. The results are shown in Table 4. The coatings produced according to these working examples are contemplated to function as pH protective coatings or layers, and also as protective coatings or layers to increase the shelf life of the vessels, compared to similar vessels provided with a barrier coating or layer but no pH protective coating or layer.
(298) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 4 HMDSO pH protective coating or layer HMDSO O.sub.2 Ar Example (sccm) (sccm) (sccm) 12 2.5 0.38 7.6 13 2.5 0.38 — 14 2.5 — —
(299) The pH protective coatings or layers produced according to these working examples are also contemplated to function as protective coatings or layers to increase the shelf life of the vessels, compared to similar vessels provided with a barrier coating or layer but no pH protective coating or layer.
(300) TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 5 Dep. OMCTS Ar/O.sub.2 Power Time AFM RMS Example (sccm) (sccm) (Watts) (sec) (nanometers) 15 2.0 10/0.38 3.5 10 16 17 19.6, 9.9, 9.4 (Average = 13.0 21 2.0 10/0.38 4.5 10 22 FIG. 7 23 12.5, 8.4, 6.1 (Average = 6.3) 24 2.0 10/0 3.4 10 25 1.9, 2.6, 3.0 (Average = 2.3)
(301) TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 6 Siloxane Power Dep. Time SiO.sub.x/Lub Coater Mode Feed Ar/O.sub.2 (W) (Sec.) Example 18 SiO.sub.x: Auto-Tube Auto HMDSO 0 sccm Ar, 37 7 SiO.sub.x/Baseline 52.5 in, 90 sccm O.sub.2 OMCTS Lub 133.4 cm. Lubricity: Auto-S same OMCTS, 10 sccm Ar 3.4 10 2.0 sccm 0.38 sccm O.sub.2 Example 19 SiO.sub.x: same same same same 37 7 SiO.sub.x/High Pwr OMCTS Lub Lubricity: same same same same 4.5 10 Example 20 SiO.sub.x: Auto-Tube same same 0 sccm Ar, 37 7 SiO.sub.x/No O.sub.2 90 sccm O.sub.2 OMCTS Lub Lubricity: Auto-S same same 10 sccm Ar 3.4 10 0 sccm O.sub.2
Summary of Lubricity and/or Protective Measurements
(302) [Table 8 shows a summary of the above OMCTS coatings or layers
(303) TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 8 Summary Table of OMCTS PH PROTECTIVE COATING OR LAYER from Tables 1, 2, 3 and 5 OMCTS O.sub.2 Ar Power Dep Time Example (sccm) (sccm) (sccm) (Watt) (sec) 3 3.0 0.00 65 6 10 4 3.0 1.00 65 6 10 5 3.0 0.38 7.8 6 10 6 3.0 0.38 7.8 6 10 9 2.5 0.38 7.6 6 10 10 2.5 0.38 0.0 6 10 11 2.5 0.00 0.0 6 10 15 2.0 0.38 10 3.5 10 16 2.0 0.38 10 4.5 10 16A 2.0 0.00 10 3.4 10 18 2.0 0.38 10 3.4 10 19 2.0 0.38 10 4.5 10 20 2.0 0.00 10 3.4 10
Comparative Example 26: Dissolution of SiO.SUB.x .Coating Versus pH
(304) The Protocol for Measuring Dissolved Silicon in a Vessel is followed, except as modified here. Test solutions—50 mM buffer solutions at pH 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12 are prepared. Buffers are selected having appropriate pKa values to provide the pH values being studied. A potassium phosphate buffer is selected for pH 3, 7, 8 and 12, a sodium citrate buffer is utilized for pH 6 and tris buffer is selected for pH 9. 3 ml of each test solution is placed in borosilicate glass 5 ml pharmaceutical vials and SiO.sub.x coated 5 ml thermoplastic pharmaceutical vials. The vials are all closed with standard coated stoppers and crimped. The vials are placed in storage at 20-25° C. and pulled at various time points for inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP) analysis of Si content in the solutions contained in the vials, in parts per billion (ppb) by weight, for different storage times.
(305) The Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate Si content is used to monitor the rate of glass dissolution, except as modified here. The data is plotted to determine an average rate of dissolution of borosilicate glass or SiO.sub.x coating at each pH condition. Representative plots at pH 6 through 8 are
(306) The rate of Si dissolution in ppb is converted to a predicted thickness (nm) rate of Si dissolution by determining the total weight of Si removed, then using a surface area calculation of the amount of vial surface (11.65 cm2) exposed to the solution and a density of SiO.sub.x of 2.2 g/cm3.
(307) The coating thicknesses in
(308) The following conclusions are reached, based on this test. First, the amount of dissolved Si in the SiO.sub.x coating or glass increases exponentially with increasing pH. Second, the SiO.sub.x coating dissolves more slowly than borosilicate glass at a pH lower than 8. The SiO.sub.x coating shows a linear, monophasic dissolution over time, whereas borosilicate glass tends to show a more rapid dissolution in the early hours of exposure to solutions, followed by a slower linear dissolution. This may be due to surface accumulation of some salts and elements on borosilicate during the forming process relative to the uniform composition of the SiO.sub.x coating. This result incidentally suggests the utility of an SiO.sub.x coating on the wall of a borosilicate glass vial to reduce dissolution of the glass at a pH lower than 8. Third, PECVD applied barrier coatings for vials in which pharmaceutical preparations are stored will need to be adapted to the specific pharmaceutical preparation and proposed storage conditions (or vice versa), at least in some instances in which the pharmaceutical preparation interacts with the barrier coating significantly.
Example 27
(309) An experiment is conducted with vessels coated with SiO.sub.x coating+OMCTS pH protective coating or layer, to test the pH protective coating or layer for its functionality as a protective coating or layer. The vessels are 5 mL vials (the vials are normally filled with product to 5 mL; their capacity without headspace, when capped, is about 7.5 mL) composed of cyclic olefin co-polymer (COC, Topas® 6013M-07).
(310) Sixty vessels are coated on their interior surfaces with an SiO.sub.x coating produced in a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process using a HMDSO precursor gas according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiO.sub.x set forth above, except that equipment suitable for coating a vial is used. The following conditions are used. HMDSO flow rate: 0.47 sccm Oxygen flow rate: 7.5 sccm RF power: 70 Watts Coating time: 12 seconds (includes a 2-sec RF power ramp-up time)
(311) Next the SiO.sub.x coated vials are coated over the SiO.sub.x with an SiO.sub.xC.sub.y coating produced in a PECVD process using an OMCTS precursor gas according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity Coating set forth above, except that the same coating equipment is used as for the SiO.sub.x coating. Thus, the special adaptations in the protocol for coating a syringe are not used. The following conditions are used. OMCTS flow rate: 2.5 sccm Argon flow rate: 10 sccm Oxygen flow rate: 0.7 sccm RF power: 3.4 Watts Coating time: 5 seconds
(312) Eight vials are selected and the total deposited quantity of PECVD coating (SiO.sub.x+SiO.sub.xC.sub.y) is determined with a Perkin Elmer Optima Model 7300DV ICP-OES instrument, using the Protocol for Total Silicon Measurement set forth above. This measurement determines the total amount of silicon in both coatings, and does not distinguish between the respective SiO.sub.x and SiO.sub.xC.sub.y coatings. The results are shown below.
(313) TABLE-US-00016 Vial Total Silicon ug/L 1 13844 2 14878 3 14387 4 13731 5 15260 6 15017 7 15118 8 12736 Mean 14371 StdDev 877 Quantity of SiO.sub.x + Lubricity layer on Vials
(314) In the following work, except as indicated otherwise in this example, the Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate is followed. Two buffered pH test solutions are used in the remainder of the experiment, respectively at pH 4 and pH 8 to test the effect of pH on dissolution rate. Both test solutions are 50 mM buffers using potassium phosphate as the buffer, diluted in water for injection (WFI) (0.1 um sterilized, filtered). The pH is adjusted to pH 4 or 8, respectively, with concentrated nitric acid.
(315) 25 vials are filled with 7.5 ml per vial of pH 4 buffered test solution and 25 other vials are filled with 7.5 ml per vial of pH 4 buffered test solution (note the fill level is to the top of the vial—no head space). The vials are closed using prewashed butyl stoppers and aluminum crimps. The vials at each pH are split into two groups. One group at each pH containing 12 vials is stored at 4° C. and the second group of 13 vials is stored at 23° C.
(316) The vials are sampled at Days 1, 3, 6, and 8. The Protocol for Measuring Dissolved Silicon in a Vessel is used, except as otherwise indicated in this example. The analytical result is reported on the basis of parts per billion of silicon in the buffered test solutions of each vial. A dissolution rate is calculated in terms of parts per billion per day as described above in the Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate. The results at the respective storage temperatures follow:
(317) TABLE-US-00017 Shelf Life Conditions 23° C. Vial SiO.sub.x + Lubricity Vial SiO.sub.x + Lubricity Coating at pH 4 Coating at pH 8 Si Dissolution Rate 31 7 (PPB/day) Shelf Life Conditions 4° C. Vial SiO.sub.x + Lubricity Vial SiO.sub.x + Lubricity Coating at pH 4 Coating at pH 8 Si Dissolution Rate 7 11 (PPB/day)
(318) The observations of Si dissolution versus time for the OMCTS-based coating at pH8 and pH 4 indicate the pH 4 rates are higher at ambient conditions. Thus, the pH 4 rates are used to determine how much material would need to be initially applied to leave a coating of adequate thickness at the end of the shelf life, taking account of the amount of the initial coating that would be dissolved. The results of this calculation are:
(319) TABLE-US-00018 Vial SiO.sub.x + Lubricity Coating at pH 4 Si Dissolution Rate (PPB/day) 31 Mass of Coating Tested (Total Si) 14,371 Shelf Life (days) at 23° C. 464 Shelf Life (years) at 23° C. 1.3 Required Mass of Coating (Total Si) - 2 years 22,630 Required Mass of Coating (Total Si) - 3 years 33,945
Shelf Life Calculation
(320) Based on this calculation, the OMCTS protective layer needs to be about 2.5 times thicker—resulting in dissolution of 33945 ppb versus the 14,371 ppb representing the entire mass of coating tested—to achieve a 3-year calculated shelf life.
Example 28
(321) The results of Comparative Example 26 and Example 27 above can be compared as follows, where the “pH protective coating or layer” is the coating of SiO.sub.xC.sub.y referred to in Example BB.
(322) TABLE-US-00019 Shelf Life Conditions - - pH 8 and 23° C. Vial SiO.sub.x + Lubricity Vial SiO.sub.x Coating Si Dissolution Rate (PPB/day) 1,250 7
(323) This data shows that the silicon dissolution rate of SiO.sub.x alone is reduced by more than 2 orders of magnitude at pH 8 in vials also coated with SiO.sub.xC.sub.y coatings.
Example 29
(324) Another comparison is shown by the following data from several different experiments carried out under similar accelerated dissolution conditions, of which the 1-day data is also presented in
(325) TABLE-US-00020 Silicon Dissolution with pH 8 at 40° C. (ug/L) Vial Coating 1 2 3 4 7 10 15 Description day days days days days days days A. SiO.sub.x made with HMDSO 165 211 226 252 435 850 1,364 Plasma + Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.y or its equivalent SiO.sub.xC.sub.y made with OMCTS Plasma B. Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.y or its 109 107 76 69 74 158 198 equivalent SiO.sub.xC.sub.y made with OMCTS Plasma C. SiO.sub.x made with HMDSO 2,504 4,228 5,226 5,650 9,292 10,177 9,551 Plasma D. SiO.sub.x made with HMDSO 1,607 1,341 3,927 10,182 18,148 20,446 21,889 Plasma + Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.y or its equivalent SiO.sub.xC.sub.y made with HMDSO Plasma E. Si.sub.wO.sub.xC.sub.y or its 1,515 1,731 1,813 1,743 2,890 3,241 3,812 equivalent SiO.sub.xC.sub.y made with HMDSO Plasma
(326)
Example 30
(327) Samples 1-6 as listed in Table 9 were prepared as described in Example AA, with further details as follows.
(328) A cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) resin was injection molded to form a batch of 5 ml vials. Silicon chips were adhered with double-sided adhesive tape to the internal walls of the vials. The vials and chips were coated with a two layer coating by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The first layer was composed of SiO.sub.x with barrier properties as defined in the present disclosure, and the second layer was an SiO.sub.xC.sub.y pH protective coating or layer.
(329) A precursor gas mixture comprising OMCTS, argon, and oxygen was introduced inside each vial. The gas inside the vial was excited between capacitively coupled electrodes by a radio-frequency (13.56 MHz) power source. The monomer flow rate (Fm) in units of sccm, oxygen flow rate (Fo) in units of sccm, argon flowrate in sccm, and power (W) in units of watts are shown in Table 9.
(330) A composite parameter, W/FM in units of kJ/kg, was calculated from process parameters W, Fm, Fo and the molecular weight, M in g/mol, of the individual gas species. W/FM is defined as the energy input per unit mass of polymerizing gases. Polymerizing gases are defined as those species that are incorporated into the growing coating such as, but not limited to, the monomer and oxygen. Non-polymerizing gases, by contrast, are those species that are not incorporated into the growing coating, such as but not limited to argon, helium and neon.
(331) In this test, PECVD processing at high W/FM is believed to have resulted in higher monomer fragmentation, producing organosiloxane coatings with higher cross-link density. PECVD processing at low W/FM, by comparison, is believed to have resulted in lower monomer fragmentation producing organosiloxane coatings with a relatively lower cross-link density.
(332) The relative cross-link density of samples 5, 6, 2, and 3 was compared between different coatings by measuring FTIR absorbance spectra. The spectra of samples 5, 6, 2, and 3 are provided in
(333) A qualitative relation—whether the coating appeared oily (shiny, often with irridescence) or non-oily (non-shiny) when applied on the silicon chips—was also found to correlate with the W/FM values in Table 9. Oily appearing coatings deposited at lower W/FM values, as confirmed by Table 9, are believed to have a lower crosslink density, as determined by their lower sym/asym ratio, relative to the non-oily coatings that were deposited at higher W/FM and a higher cross-link density. The only exception to this general rule of thumb was sample 2 in Table 9. It is believed that the coating of sample 2 exhibited a non-oily appearance because it was was too thin to see. Thus, an oilyness observation was not reported in Table 9 for sample 2. The chips were analyzed by FTIR in transmission mode, with the infrared spectrum transmitted through the chip and sample coating, and the transmission through an uncoated null chip subtracted.
(334) Non-oily organosiloxane layers produced at higher W/FM values, which protect the underlying SiO.sub.x coating from aqueous solutions at elevated pH and temperature, were preferred because they provided lower Si dissolution and a longer shelf life, as confirmed by Table 9. For example, the calculated silicon dissolution by contents of the vial at a pH of 8 and 40° C. was reduced for the non-oily coatings, and the resulting shelf life was 1381 days in one case and 1147 days in another, as opposed to the much shorter shelf lives and higher rates of dissolution for oily coatings. Calculated shelf life was determined as shown for Example AA. The calculated shelf life also correlated linearly to the ratio of symmetric to asymmetric stretching modes of the Si—O—Si bond in organosiloxane pH protective coatings or layers.
(335) Sample 6 can be particularly compared to Sample 5. An organosiloxane, pH protective coating or layer was deposited according to the process conditions of sample 6 in Table 9. The coating was deposited at a high W/FM. This resulted in a non-oily coating with a high Si—O—Si sym/asym ratio of 0.958, which resulted in a low rate of dissolution of 84.1 ppb/day (measured by the Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate) and long shelf life of 1147 days (measured by the Protocol for Determining Calculated Shelf Life). The FTIR spectra of this coating is shown in
(336) An organosiloxane pH protective coating or layer was deposited according to the process conditions of sample 5 in Table 9. The coating was deposited at a moderate W/FM. This resulted in an oily coating with a low Si—O—Si sym/asym ratio of 0.673, which resulted in a high rate of dissolution of 236.7 ppb/day (following the Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate) and shorter shelf life of 271 days (following the Protocol for Determining Calculated Shelf Life). The FTIR spectrum of this coating is shown in
(337) Sample 2 can be particularly compared to Sample 3. A pH protective coating or layer was deposited according to the process conditions of sample 2 in Table 9. The coating was deposited at a low W/FM. This resulted in a coating that exhibited a low Si—O—Si sym/asym ratio of 0.582, which resulted in a high rate of dissolution of 174 ppb/day and short shelf life of 107 days. The FTIR spectrum of this coating is shown in
(338) An organosiloxane, pH pH protective coating or layer was deposited according to the process conditions of sample 3 in Table 9. The coating was deposited at a high W/FM. This resulted in a non-oily coating with a high Si—O—Si sym/asym ratio of 0.947, which resulted in a low rate of Si dissolution of 79.5 ppb/day (following the Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate) and long shelf life of 1381 days (following the Protocol for Determining Calculated Shelf Life). The FTIR spectrum of this coating is shown in
(339) TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 9 FTIR Absorbance Process Parameters Si Dissoution @ pH 8/40.sup.° C. Si—O—Si Si—O—Si Flow O.sub.2 Total Shelf Rate of sym stretch asym stretch Ratio Rate Flow Power W/FM Si life Dissolution (1000- (1160- Si—O—Si Samples OMCTS Ar Rate (W) (kJ/kg) (ppb) (days) (ppb/day) 1040 cm.sup.−1) 1100 cm.sup.−1) (sym/asym) Oilyness 1 3 10 0.5 14 21613 43464 385 293.18 0.153 0.219 0.700 YES 2 3 20 0.5 2 3088 7180 107 174.08 0.011 0.020 0.582 NA 3 1 20 0.5 14 62533 42252.17 1381 79.53 0.093 0.098 0.947 NO 4 2 15 0.5 8 18356 27398 380 187.63 0.106 0.141 0.748 YES 5 3 20 0.5 14 21613 24699 271 236.73 0.135 0.201 0.673 YES 6 1 10 0.5 14 62533 37094 1147 84.1 0.134 0.140 0.958 NO
Example 31
(340) An experiment similar to Example 27 was carried out, modified as indicated in this example and in Table 10 (where the results are tabulated). 100 5 mL COP vials were made and coated with an SiO.sub.x barrier layer and an OMCTS-based pH protective coating or layer as described previously, except that for Sample PC194 only the pH protective coating or layer was applied. The coating quantity was again measured in parts per billion extracted from the surfaces of the vials to remove the entire pH protective coating or layer, as reported in Table 10.
(341) In this example, several different coating dissolution conditions were employed. The test solutions used for dissolution contained either 0.02 or 0.2 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant, as well as a buffer to maintain a pH of 8. Dissolution tests were carried out at either 23° C. or 40° C.
(342) Multiple syringes were filled with each test solution, stored at the indicated temperature, and analyzed at several intervals to determine the extraction profile and the amount of silicon extracted. An average dissolution rate for protracted storage times was then calculated by extrapolating the data obtained according to the Protocol for Determining Average Dissolution Rate. The results were calculated as described previously and are shown in Table 10. Of particular note, as shown on Table 10, were the very long calculated shelf lives of the filled packages provided with a PC 194 pH protective coating or layer:
(343) 21045 days (over 57 years) based on storage at a pH of 8, 0.02 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant, at 23° C.;
(344) 38768 days (over 100 years) based on storage at a pH of 8, 0.2 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant, at 23° C.;
(345) 8184 days (over 22 years) based on storage at a pH of 8, 0.02 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant, at 40° C.; and
(346) 14732 days (over 40 years) based on storage at a pH of 8, 0.2 wt. % polysorbate-80 surfactant, at 40° C.
(347) Referring to Table 10, the longest calculated shelf lives corresponded with the use of an RF power level of 150 Watts and a corresponding high W/FM value. It is believed that the use of a higher power level causes higher cross-link density of the pH protective coating or layer.
(348) TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 10 OMCTS Argon O.sub.2 Plasma Total Si Calculated Average Rate Flow Rate Flow Rate Flow Rate Power Duration W/FM (PPb) (OMCTS) Shelf-life of Dissolution Sample (sccm) (sccm) (sccm) (W) (sec) (kJ/kg) layer) (days) (ppb/day) Process Parameters Si Dissolution @ pH 8/23.sup.° C./0.02% Tween ®-80 PC194 0.5 20 0.5 150 20 1223335 73660 21045 3.5 018 1.0 20 0.5 18 15 77157 42982 1330 32.3 Process Parameters Si Dissolution @ pH 8/23.sup.° C./0.2% Tween ®-80 PC194 0.5 20 0.5 150 20 1223335 73660 38768 1.9 018 1.0 20 0.5 18 15 77157 42982 665 64.6 048 4 80 2 35 20 37507 56520 1074 52.62 Process Parameters Si Dissolution @ pH 8/40.sup.° C./0.02% Tween ®-80 PC194 0.5 20 0.5 150 20 1223335 73660 8184 9 018 1.0 20 0.5 18 15 77157 42982 511 84 Process Parameters Si Dissolution @ pH 8/40.sup.° C./0.2% Tween ®-80 PC194 0.5 20 0.5 150 20 1223335 73660 14732 5 018 1.0 20 0.5 18 15 77157 42982 255 168
Example 32
(349) Another series of experiments similar to those of Example 31 are run, showing the effect of progressively increasing the RF power level on the FTIR absorbance spectrum of the pH protective coating or layer. The results are tabulated in Table 11, which in each instance shows a symmetric/assymmetric ratio greater than 0.75 between the maximum amplitude of the Si—O—Si symmetrical stretch peak normally located between about 1000 and 1040 cm-1, and the maximum amplitude of the Si—O—Si assymmetric stretch peak normally located between about 1060 and about 1100 cm-1. Thus, the symmetric/assymmetric ratio is 0.79 at a power level of 20 W, 1.21 or 1.22 at power levels of 40, 60, or 80 W, and 1.26 at 100 Watts under otherwise comparable conditions.
(350) The 150 Watt data in Table 11 is taken under somewhat different conditions than the other data, so it is not directly comparable with the 20-100 Watt data discussed above. The FTIR data of samples 6 and 8 of Table 11 was taken from the upper portion of the vial and the FTIR data of samples 7 and 9 of Table 11 was taken from the lower portion of the vial. Also, the amount of OMCTS was cut in half for samples 8 and 9 of Table 11, compared to samples 6 and 7. Reducing the oxygen level while maintaining a power level of 150 W raised the symmetric/asymmetric ratio still further, as shown by comparing samples 6 and 7 to samples 8 and 9 in Table 11.
(351) It is believed that, other conditions being equal, increasing the symmetric/asymmetric ratio increases the shelf life of a vessel filled with a material having a pH exceeding 5.
(352) Table 12 shows the calculated O-Parameters and N-Parameters (as defined in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070) for the experiments summarized in Table 11. As Table 12 shows, the O-Parameters ranged from 0.134 to 0.343, and the N-Parameters ranged from 0.408 to 0.623—all outside the ranges claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,067,070.
(353) TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 11 Sym- Assym- OMCTS Argon O.sub.2 Plasma metric Stretch etricStretch Symmetric/ Flow Rate Flow Rate Flow Rate Power Duration W/FM Peak at 1000- Peak at 1060- Assymetric Samples (sccm) (sccm) (sccm) (W) (sec) (kJ/kg) 1040 cm−.sup.1 1100 cm−.sup.1 Ratio ID Process Parameters FTIR Results 1 1 20 0.5 20 20 85,730 0.0793 0.1007 0.79 2 1 20 0.5 40 20 171,460 0.0619 0.0507 1.22 3 1 20 0.5 60 20 257,190 0.1092 0.0904 1.21 4 1 20 0.5 80 20 342,919 0.1358 0.1116 1.22 5 1 20 0.5 100 20 428,649 0.209 0.1658 1.26 6 1 20 0.5 150 20 642,973 0.2312 0.1905 1.21 7 1 20 0.5 150 20 642,973 0.2324 0.1897 1.23 8 0.5 20 0.5 150 20 1,223,335 0.1713 0.1353 1.27 9 0.5 20 0.5 150 20 1,223,335 0.1475 0.1151 1.28
(354) TABLE-US-00024 TABLE 12 OMCTS Argon O.sub.2 Plasma Samples Flow Rate Flow Rate Flow Rate Power Duration W/FM O- N- ID (sccm) (sccm) (sccm) (W) (sec) (kJ/kg) Parameter Parameter Process Parameters 1 1 20 0.5 20 20 85,730 0.343 0.436 2 1 20 0.5 40 20 171,460 0.267 0.408 3 1 20 0.5 60 20 257,190 0.311 0.457 4 1 20 0.5 80 20 342,919 0.270 0.421 5 1 20 0.5 100 20 428,649 0.177 0.406 6 1 20 0.5 150 20 642,973 0.151 0.453 7 1 20 0.5 150 20 642,973 0.151 0.448 8 0.5 20 0.5 150 20 1,223,335 0.134 0.623 9 0.5 20 0.5 150 20 1,223,335 0.167 0.609
Example 33
(355) The purpose of this example was to evaluate the recoverability or drainage of a slightly viscous aqueous solution from glass, COP and coated vials,
(356) This study evaluated the recovery of a 30 cps (centipoise) carbohydrate solution in water-for-injection from (A) an uncoated COP vial, (B) an SiO.sub.x+pH protective layer coated COP vial prepared according to the above Protocol for Coating Syringe Barrel Interior with SiO.sub.x, followed by the Protocol for Coating Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS PH protective Coating or Layer, and (C) a glass vial.
(357) 2.0 ml of the carbohydrate solution was pipetted into 30 vials each of glass, COP and pH protective coated vials. The solution was aspirated from the vials with a 10 ml syringe, through a 23 gauge, 1.5″ needle. The vials were tipped to one side as the solution was aspirated to maximize the amount recovered. The same technique and similar withdrawal time was used for all vials. The vials were weighed empty, after placing 2.0 ml of the solution to the vial and at the conclusion of aspirating the solution from the vial. The amount delivered to the vial (A) was determined by subtracting the weight of the empty vial from the weight of the vial with the 2.0 ml of solution. The weight of solution not recovered (B) was determined by subtracting the weight of the empty vial from the weight of the vials after aspirating the solution from the vial. The percent unrecovered was determined by dividing B by A and multiplying by 100.
(358) It was observed during the aspiration of drug product that the glass vials remained wetted with the solution. The COP vial repelled the liquid and as the solution was aspirated from the vials. This helped with recovery but droplets were observed to bead on the sidewalls of the vials during the aspiration. The pH protective coated vials also repelled the liquid during aspiration but no beading of solution on the sidewalls was observed.
(359) The conclusion was that pH protective coated vials do not wet with aqueous solutions as do glass vials, leading to superior recovery of drug product relative to glass. PH protective coated vials were not observed to cause beading of solution on sidewall during aspiration of aqueous products therefore coated vials performed better than uncoated COP vials in product recovery experiments.
Example 34
(360) Syringe samples were produced as follows. A COC 8007 extended barrel syringe was produced according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe Barrel. An SiO.sub.x coating or layer was applied to some of the syringes according to the Protocol for coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with SiO.sub.x. A pH protective coating or layer was applied to the SiO.sub.x coated syringes according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity Coating, modified as follows. The OMCTS was supplied from a vaporizer, due to its low volatility. Argon carrier gas was used. The process conditions were set to the following: OMCTS—3 sccm Argon gas—65 sccm Power—6 watts Time—10 seconds
(361) The coater was later determined to have a small leak while producing the samples identified in the Table, which resulted in an estimated oxygen flow of 1.0 sccm. The samples were produced without introducing oxygen.
(362) The coatings produced according to these working examples are contemplated to function as primer coatings or layers, and also as protective coatings or layers to increase the shelf life of the vessels, compared to similar vessels provided with a barrier coating or layer but no pH protective coating or layer.
(363) PECVD Process for Trilayer Coating
(364) The PECVD trilayer coating described in this specification can be applied, for example, as follows for a 1 to 5 mL vessel. Two specific examples are 1 mL thermoplastic resin syringe and a 5 mL thermoplastic resin drug vial. Larger or smaller vessels will call for adjustments in parameters that a person of ordinary skill can carry out in view of the teaching of this specification.
(365) The apparatus used is the PECVD apparatus with rotating quadrupole magnets as described generally in this specification.
(366) The general coating parameter ranges, with preferred ranges in parentheses, for a trilayer coating for a 1 mL syringe barrel are shown in the PECVD Trilayer Process General Parameters Tables (1 mL syringe and 5 mL vial).
(367) TABLE-US-00025 PECVD Trilayer Process General Parameters Table (1 mL syringe) Parameter Units Tie Barrier pH Protective Power W 40-90 140 40-90 (60-80) (60-80) TMDSO Flow sccm 1-10 None 1-10 (3-5) (3-5) HMDSO Flow sccm None 1.56 None O.sub.2 Flow sccm 0.5-5.sup. 20 0.5-5.sup. (1.5-2.5) (1.5-2.5) Argon Flow sccm 40-120 0 40-120 (70-90) (70-90) Ramp Time seconds None None None Deposition Time seconds 0.1-10 20 0.1-40 (1-3) (15-25) Tube Pressure Torr 0.01-10.sup. 0.59 0.01-10.sup. (0.1-1.5) (0.1-1.5)
(368) TABLE-US-00026 PECVD Trilayer Process General Parameters Table (5 mL vial) Parameter Units Adhesion Barrier Protection Power W 40-90 140 40-90 (60-80) (60-80) TMDSO Flow sccm 1-10 None 1-10 (3-5) (3-5) HMDSO Flow sccm None 1.56 None O.sub.2 Flow sccm 0.5-5.sup. 20 0.5-5.sup. (1.5-2.5) (1.5-2.5) Argon Flow sccm 40-120 0 40-120 (70-90) (70-90) Ramp Time seconds None None None Deposition Time seconds 0.1-10 20 0.1-40 (1-3) (15-25) Tube Pressure Torr 0.01-10.sup. 0.59 0.01-10.sup. (0.1-1.5) (0.1-1.5)
Example 35
(369) Examples of specific coating parameters that have been used for a 1 mL syringe and 5 mL vial are shown in the PECVD Trilayer Process Specific Parameters Tables (1 mL syringe and 5 mL vial):
(370) TABLE-US-00027 PECVD Trilayer Process Specific Parameters Table (1 mL syringe) Parameter Units Tie Barrier Protection Power W 70 140 70 TMDSO Flow sccm 4 None 4 HMDSO Flow sccm None 1.56 None O.sub.2 Flow sccm 2 20 2 Argon Flow sccm 80 0 80 Ramp Time seconds None None None Deposition Time seconds 2.5 20 10 Tube Pressure Torr 1 0.59 1
(371) TABLE-US-00028 PECVD Trilayer Process Specific Parameters Table (5 mL vial) Parameter Units Adhesion Barrier Protection Power W 20 40 20 TMDSO Flow sccm 2 0 2 HMDSO Flow sccm 0 3 0 O.sub.2 Flow sccm 1 50 1 Argon Flow sccm 20 0 20 Ramp Time seconds 0 2 2 Deposition Time seconds 2.5 10 10 Tube Pressure Torr 0.85 1.29 0.85
(372) The O-parameter and N-parameter values for the pH protective coating or layer applied to the 1 mL syringe as described above are 0.34 and 0.55, respectively.
(373) The O-parameter and N-parameter values for the pH protective coating or layer applied to the 5 mL vial are 0.24 and 0.63, respectively.
Example 36
(374) Referring to
(375) TABLE-US-00029 TABLE Example 36 Syringe Location Adhesion Barrier Protection 1 46 75 343 2 38 55 273 3 86 47 493 4 42 25 287
(376) Referring to
(377)
(378) A syringe having a coating similar to the trilayer coating of
Example 37
(379)
Example 38
(380)
(381) TABLE-US-00030 Vial Coating Distribution Table Vial Location Adhesion Barrier Protection Total Trilayer, nm 1 13 29 77 119 2 14 21 58 93 3 25 37 115 177 4 35 49 158 242 5 39 49 161 249 6 33 45 148 226 7 31 29 153 213 8 48 16 218 282 9 33 53 155 241 10 31 29 150 210 Average 30 36 139 205
Example 39
(382)
(383) The three vials were each exposed to 1 N potassium hydroxide for four hours, then exposed for 24 hours to a ruthenium oxide (RuO4) stain that darkens any exposed part of the thermoplastic vial unprotected by the coatings. The high pH potassium hydroxide exposure erodes any exposed part of the barrier coating or layer at a substantial rate, greatly reduced, however by an intact pH protective coating or layer. In particular, the high pH exposure opens up any pinholes in the coating system. As FIG. #24 shows, the uncoated vial is completely black, showing the absence of any effective coating. The bilayer coating was mostly intact under the treatment conditions, but on microscopic inspection has many pinholes (illustrated by