METHOD OF PREPARING REGENERATED SPENT FERMENTED BEVERAGE MEDIA FOR RE-USE IN STABILIZATION AND FILTRATION OF FERMENTED BEVERAGES

Abstract

This disclosure includes regenerated inorganic fermented beverage stabilization and/or clarification media and a process for such regeneration. Inorganic stabilization and clarification media (for processing beer or the like) may include expanded perlite or other expanded natural glasses, diatomaceous earth, silica gel or other precipitated silicas and compositions that incorporate these materials. Such media may be regenerated individually, together in a mixture or together as part of a composite product. The regenerated media meet the requirements for physical and chemical properties for re-use and replacement of the majority of particulate inorganic filtration media and inorganic stabilization media consumed in stabilization and clarification processes, and the related regeneration process provides for substantial benefits to brewers through a reduction of costs to purchase and transport stabilization and clarification media, to dispose of spent cake and/or membrane retentate, while providing for substantial reductions in the introduction of soluble impurities into the fermented beverage.

Claims

1-30. (canceled)

31. A method of preparing a media for re fermented beverages comprising: heating a spent fermented beverage media in an oxidizing environment to form a regenerated spent fermented beverage media for re-use in stabilization of fermented beverages, wherein the regenerated spent fermented beverage media includes silica stabilization media.

32. The method of claim 31, further comprising dewatering the spent fermented beverage media prior to heating for regeneration.

33. The method of claim 32, further comprising drying the spent fermented beverage media prior to heating for regeneration.

34. The method of claim 31, wherein heating the spent fermented beverage media in an oxidizing atmosphere in a temperature range of about 600° C. to about 800° C.

35. The method of claim 34, wherein the temperature range is about 650° C. to about 750° C.

36. The method of claim 34, wherein heating the spent fermented beverage media occurs for a time period between 30 seconds and 1 hour.

37. The method of claim 31, wherein heating the spent fermented beverage media occurs in an oxidizing environment having a sufficient amount of oxygen to form the regenerated spent fermented beverage media.

38. The method of claim 37, wherein the oxidizing atmosphere is achieved by intimately contacting the spent fermented beverage media with air containing oxygen sufficient to fully oxidize organic matter in the spent fermented beverage media.

39. The method of claim 38, wherein the air, as supplied, contains 15% to 50% oxygen by volume.

40. The method of claim 31, wherein the spent fermented beverage media further comprises an inorganic material other than silica stabilization media.

41. The method of claim 40, wherein the inorganic material is selected from the group consisting of diatomite, perlite, rice hull ash or combinations thereof.

42. The method of claim 31, further comprising adding an oxidizing agent to the spent fermented beverage media during the heating.

43. The method of claim 42, wherein the oxidizing agent is selected from the group consisting of oxygen-enriched air, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, fluorine, chlorine, nitric acid, an alkali nitrate, peroxymonosulfuric acid, peroxydisulfuric acid, an alkali salt of peroxymonosulfuric acid, an alkali salt of peroxydisulfuric acid, an alkali salt of chlorite, alkali salt of chlorate, alkali salt of perchlorate or alkali salt of hypochlorite.

44. The method of claim 31, further comprising adding a stabilization media and to the regenerated spent fermented beverage media to adjust at least one of a stabilization capability of the regenerated spent fermented beverage media, a size exclusion of the regenerated spent fermented beverage media or a permeability of the regenerated spent fermented beverage media.

45. The method of claim 31, further comprising adding a filtration media to the regenerated spent fermented beverage media to adjust at least one of a stabilization capability of the regenerated spent fermented beverage media, a size exclusion of the regenerated spent fermented beverage media or a permeability of the regenerated spent fermented beverage media.

46. The method of claim 31, wherein the silica stabilization media is selected from the group consisting of silica xerogel, silica hydrogel, hydrated silica xerogel or silica hydrous gel.

47. The method of claim 31, further comprising heating the spent fermented beverage media for regeneration of a stabilizing-filtration media.

48. The method of claim 47, wherein the stabilizing-filtration media comprises a modified diatomite stabilizing-filtration media.

49. The method of claim 47, wherein the stabilizing-filtration media comprises Celite Cynergy.

50. The method of claim 31, further comprising: accumulating spent fermented beverage media; segregating, prior to the heating, the spent fermented beverage media according to at least one of a permeability range, a stabilization media content or an extractable chemistry; and storing the spent fermented beverage media prior to regeneration.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0054] Disclosed herein are regenerated spent media and a method of regenerating such spent media. Disclosed herein are embodiments of regenerated spent media containing silica stabilization media, and a method of regenerating such media spent in the stabilization or the stabilization and clarification of liquids, especially fermented beverages such as beer. The term “media” in this disclosure means one or more medium. Such regenerated silica stabilization media are reusable for the same purpose and have the same, similar or better stabilizing performance as new silica stabilization media. Also disclosed herein is a method of regenerating spent media (resulting from fermented beverage stabilization and clarification) that contains both inorganic filtration media and silica stabilization media (e.g., mixtures or composites of filtration media and silica stabilization media). Such regenerated media is reusable for the same purpose and has the same, similar or better filtration and stabilization performance as comparable new media.

[0055] Silica stabilization media disclosed herein may include materials described by common industry practice as silica gels, especially xerogel types. Silica gel adsorbents with similar properties have also sometimes been erroneously described as precipitated silica, and we include any synthetic silicas capable of adsorbing proteins from beer as silica gel for the purposes of this disclosure. Thus, as used herein, silica stabilization media is media that selectively removes certain proteins; such silica stabilization media includes silica gels (e.g., silica xerogels, hydrated silica xerogels, silica hydrogels, hydrated or hydrous silica gels, silica gel adsorbents, precipitated silica gel), precipitated silica, or any synthetic silica capable of adsorbing proteins from beer or other fermented beverages.

[0056] To regenerate a spent silica stabilization media, adsorbed organic matter such as proteins need to be removed. Other organic matter, such as yeast cell debris, trapped in the spent silica stabilization media need also to be removed. At the same time, it is essential that silica properties such as pore structure, surface area and surface reactivity be preserved to maintain its stabilization functionality.

[0057] Protein removal might conceptually be achieved by desorption such as washing with hot water or diluted acidic or basic solutions. Hot water or dilute acid washing may not be able to effectively remove all adsorbed proteins. Washing with a basic solution tends to partially dissolve silica gel and damage its pore structure and surface reactivity. As a result, the use of a wet process to regenerate silica stabilization media following its use to stabilize beer has not yet been demonstrated.

[0058] The inventors of this disclosure have been successful in using a thermal process (thermal treatment in an oxidizing environment to combust proteins and other organic matter) to regenerate silica stabilization media and to regenerate stabilizing-filtration media that includes silica stabilization media (for example, modified diatomite stabilizing-filtration media that includes silica stabilization media) previously used in beer stabilization. The inventors have determined that such a thermal process is effective if the temperature and heat transfer are carefully controlled, as this is necessary to prevent the collapse of the silica pore structure.

[0059] As disclosed herein, silica stabilization media or stabilizing-filtration media that includes silica stabilization media (e.g., modified diatomite stabilizing-filtration media that includes silica stabilization media) may be regenerated to a state in which its beer/fermented beverage stabilization effectiveness is essentially restored by heating at a temperature between about 600° C. to about 800° C. in an oxidizing environment for an appropriate period of time. When used herein in the context of a temperature for heating spent fermented beverage media to form regenerated media, the term “about” means plus or minus 10° C. An oxidizing environment herein means sufficient chemical driving force for completely breaking down molecular structures of proteins and other organic matter present in the spent media by oxidation reactions of these organic contaminants so that they form volatile gases, preferably of their highest oxidation states. This may be achieved by supplying sufficient oxygen during the regeneration process in excess of the amount required to react with all organic matter present to form volatile gases, preferably of highest oxidation states. The means of supplying a sufficient amount of oxygen may include intimately contacting the spent media with air during regeneration, supplying fresh air during regeneration and supplying oxygen enriched air during regeneration. This may also be achieved by the addition of one or more other types of oxidizing agents, in place of or in addition to oxygen (although the addition of oxidizing agents may not be necessary when a sufficient amount of oxygen is present).

[0060] The oxidizing reaction is enabled and enhanced, both thermodynamically and kinetically, by heating. The heating may be at a temperature between about 600° C. to about 800° C. In another embodiment, the heating may be at a temperature between about 650° C. to about 750° C. In yet another embodiment, the heating may be at a temperature between about 690° C. to about 710° C. Reduced temperatures (e.g., less than about 600° C.) tend to cause insufficient removal of organic matter from spent silica stabilization media while excessive temperatures (e.g., more than about 800° C.) tend to cause collapsing of the pore structure of the silica stabilization media. The time needed to complete the oxidation reactions depends on both the temperature and the oxidation environment. In one embodiment, the time period for heating was 30 seconds to an hour. In another embodiment, the time period for heating was 30 seconds to 30 minutes. In yet another embodiment, in which the heating temperature was about 690° C. to about 710° C., the heating time period was 1 minute to 30 minutes. In some embodiments, the heating was conducted at an elevation of about 1370 meters where the nominal atmospheric pressure is about 645 mmHg or about 85% of that at the sea level. When used herein in the context of elevation, the term “about” means plus or minus 50 meters.

[0061] Disclosed herein is a process for thermal regeneration of spent media from beer/fermented beverage stabilization (or stabilization and filtration or stabilizing-filtration). The spent media may be in the form of spent cake and/or (membrane) retentate, or the like. The spent media may include silica stabilization media, or mixtures or composites of silica stabilization media and filtration media. While the detailed description herein is made with reference to the regeneration of spent media from beer stabilization (or stabilization and filtration), the teachings of this disclosure may be employed with spent media from the stabilization (or stabilization and filtration or stabilizing-filtration) of other fermented liquids/beverages.

[0062] In an embodiment of the method disclosed herein, (beer) spent media containing inorganic silica stabilization media or containing (a mixture of or composites of) inorganic silica stabilization media and inorganic filtration media may be thermally regenerated by calcination in an oxidizing environment at about 600° C. to about 800° C. In some embodiments, but not necessarily all embodiments, an oxidizing agent in addition to oxygen may be used. The regenerated spent media obtained by the process disclosed herein has a beer stabilization (or stabilization and filtration or stabilizing-filtration) performance similar to corresponding new media.

[0063] In one embodiment, the method may further include adding an oxidizing agent to the spent fermented beverage media before calcination or during calcination. In a refinement, the oxidizing agent may be hydrogen peroxide, ozone, fluorine, chlorine, nitric acid, an alkali nitrate, peroxymonosulfuric acid, peroxydisulfuric acid, an alkali salt of peroxymonosulfuric acid, an alkali salt of peroxydisulfuric acid, an alkali salt of chlorite, alkali salt of chlorate, alkali salt of perchlorate or alkali salt of hypochlorite.

[0064] In an embodiment, the method may further comprise washing with an acid the spent fermented beverage media prior to calcination. In an embodiment, the method may further comprise washing with an acid the regenerated media after calcination. In a refinement of the above, the acid may be a mineral acid, an organic acid or a mixture thereof. In a further refinement, the mineral acid may be sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid or a mixture thereof. In another refinement, the organic acid may be acetic or citric acid or a mixture thereof.

[0065] In another aspect, a method of processing a fermented liquid is disclosed. The method may comprise mixing the fermented liquid with a mixture that includes regenerated silica stabilization media or a regenerated (blend/mix of or composite of) silica stabilization media and filtration media, and separating the mixture from the liquid through centrifugation, particle filtration or membrane filtration. The method may further comprise adding prior to separating the mixture from the fermented liquid: (1) new stabilization media; (2) new filtration media; (3) new stabilizing-filtration media; or (4) new stabilization and new filtration media to the mixture.

[0066] Products regenerable by the teachings of the present disclosure may include inorganic filtration media, silica stabilization media and their mixtures or composites. Such inorganic filtration media may include diatomite, expanded perlite, rice hull ash, their blends or composites of these materials. The diatomite that is regenerated may be natural, straight calcined or flux-calcined.

[0067] A composite herein is a particulate material that may comprise at least one individual particle that is further comprised of at least two smaller, non-homogeneous particles intimately bound through adhesion, sintering or fusion. A composite may also be a particulate material onto which another material is coated or deposited. For example, modified diatomite stabilizing-filtration media (both stabilizes and filters) includes composites containing silica stabilization media (e.g., composites containing silica adsorbents). In some embodiments, modified diatomite stabilizing-filtration media may be comprised of filtration media particulates (diatomite particulates) that are coated or deposited with silica stabilization media. These two materials may be so intimately bound together that they may not be separately observable under some levels of magnification, however the resulting effect (of the combination of these materials) on the surface area of the particulates of the stabilizing-filtration media is observable. As noted earlier, one example of a modified diatomite stabilizing-filtration media is Celite Cynergy®. Stabilizing-filtration media is also regenerable by the methods taught herein. Regenerated silica stabilization media may include various types of silica gel (e.g., silica xerogel, hydrated silica xerogel, silica hydrogel, hydrated or hydrous silica gel, silica gel adsorbent, precipitated silica gel), precipitated silica or any synthetic silica used for stabilizing beer or other fermented liquid beverages.

[0068] The regenerated silica stabilization media, the regenerated stabilizing-filtration media, and regenerated mixtures of filtration and stabilization media are tested for beer stabilizing capability in comparison with the corresponding new media (silica stabilization media, stabilizing-filtration media, or mixture of filtration and silica stabilization media). In each test cited in the examples, a sample of silica stabilization media, stabilizing-filtration media or mixture of filtration and stabilization media was mixed with 50-ml of a untreated (not yet stabilized) beer in a centrifuge tube in an ice-bath shaker for 30 minutes, followed by centrifugation then filtering through a #1 filter paper under vacuum. The treated and filtered beer was analyzed for alcohol chill haze (ACH) to characterize stability following the European Brewery Convention (EBC) method, as described in EBC Analytica 9.41—Alcohol Chill Haze in Beer. A 30-ml sample of the treated and filtered beer was collected in a turbidity cell, added and mixed with 0.9 ml dehydrated ethanol, and chilled at −5±0.1° C. for 40 minutes in an Isotemp™ II Recirculating Chiller (Fisher Scientific). The chilled beer sample was measured for turbidity (haze) immediately afterwards using a Hach® Ratio/XR Turbidimeter, reported in nephelometric turbidity units (ntu). A blank sample of the same beer (without the addition of stabilization media, stabilizing-filtration media, or filtration and stabilization media) was treated through the same process at the same time and was also measured for its alcohol chill haze, which was used as a baseline for determining the stabilization effectiveness of the media being tested in the term of the percentage reduction in alcohol chill haze. A percentage alcohol chill haze reduction (ACHR) is calculated by dividing the alcohol chill haze of a stabilized beer by the alcohol chill haze of the blank beer.

ACHR (%)=(1−ACH.sub.Stabilized/ACH.sub.Blank)*100,  [1]

[0069] where ACH.sub.Stabilized and ACH.sub.Blank are alcohol chill haze of stabilized and blank beers, respectively. A higher ACHR indicates a better performance of a beer stabilization medium. When characterizing a regenerated stabilization medium or a regenerated stabilizing-filtration medium or a mixture of regenerated stabilization and filtration media, a percentage Regeneration Efficiency (RE) is calculated as follows by dividing the ACHR of the regenerated media stabilized beer, ACHR.sub.Reg′d, by a benchmark ACHR, ACHR.sub.BM. An RE of 100% indicates a full regeneration of the stabilization media.

RE (%)=ACHR.sub.Reg′d/ACHR.sub.BM*100.  [2]

[0070] The benchmark ACHR is obtained by stabilizing the same beer under identical conditions with the new media from which the regenerated media are produced. Since thermal treatment usually changes and mostly reduces the volatile constituents of silica gel stabilization media, and the regenerated media usually have lower loss on ignitions (LOIs) than the combined LOIs of their respective new media constituents. A concept of “silica gel equivalency” is introduced to allow benchmarking on the same silica (SiO.sub.2) mass basis. The “silica gel equivalent” mass or dosage of a regenerated silica stabilization medium is calculated by factoring in the LOIs of the new and regenerated media, i.e.,

M.sub.Stab.Equiv.=M.sub.Reg′d*(1−LOI.sub.Reg′d)/(1−LOI.sub.Stab).  [3]

[0071] For example, a regenerated silica stabilization medium with 0.2% LOI is regenerated from a spent silica xerogel having 13% LOI prior to use. For the regenerated medium at an actual mass dosage of 1.00 g/L, its equivalent mass dosage of the new silica xerogel is 1.00*(1−0.002)/(1−0.13)=1.15 g/L.

[0072] Similar equivalency calculations for both stabilization media and filtration media are applicable to regenerated media comprising both media.

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{M}_{\mathrm{Stab}.\mathrm{equiv}}=M_{\mathrm{Reg}\text{'}d}\frac{\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Reg}\text{'}d}\right)}{\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Stab}}\right)}\\ \frac{W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Stab}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Stab}}\right)}{W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Stab}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Stab}}\right)+W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Filt}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Filt}}\right)}\\ =M_{\mathrm{Reg}\text{'}d}\frac{W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Stab}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Reg}\text{'}d}\right)}{W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Stab}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Stab}}\right)+W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Filt}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Filt}}\right)},\end{array}\mathrm{and}& \left[4\right]\\ \begin{array}{c}{M}_{\mathrm{Filt}.\mathrm{equiv}}=M_{\mathrm{Reg}\text{'}d}\frac{\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Reg}\text{'}d}\right)}{\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Filt}}\right)}\\ \frac{W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Filt}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Filt}}\right)}{W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Stab}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Stab}}\right)+W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Filt}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Filt}}\right)}\\ =M_{\mathrm{Reg}\text{'}d}\frac{W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Stab}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Reg}\text{'}d}\right)}{W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Stab}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Stab}}\right)+W_{\mathrm{Cake}.\mathrm{Filt}}\left(1-{\mathrm{LOI}}_{\mathrm{Filt}}\right)},\end{array}& \left[5\right]\end{array}$

[0073] In Equations [3-5], M.sub.Stab.equiv and M.sub.Filt.equiv are respectively equivalent mass dosages of stabilization media and filtration media of single component or multi-component media. LOI.sub.Stab, LOI.sub.Filt and LOI.sub.Reg′d are loss on ignitions of new stabilization media, new filtration media and regenerated media, respectively; W.sub.Cake.Stab and W.sub.Cake.Filt are mass contents of the stabilization media and filtration media in the spent cake and M.sub.Reg′d actual mass dosage of the regenerated media, respectively.

[0074] In the event that the equivalent dosage of a stabilization component in regenerated media is slightly different than the dosage of the new media (mostly due to LOI differentials). Equation [2] is modified to factored in the dosages to calculated an Adjusted Regeneration Efficiency (ARE), i.e.

ARE (%)=ACHR.sub.Reg′d/ACHR.sub.BM*(M.sub.BM/M.sub.Stab.Equiv)*100,  [6]

[0075] where M.sub.BM and M.sub.Stab.Equiv are respective mass dosages of the stabilization media in the benchmark test and its equivalent in the regenerated media test.

[0076] Regenerated silica stabilization and filtration media comprising inorganic filtration media and silica stabilization media are characterized by their filtration and stabilization performance against respective new media. In the examples, a small bench scale pressure filter was used for beer stabilization-filtration tests. It had a vertical cylindrical filter chamber of 1⅝ inch (41.3 mm) inside diameter and 2.5 inch (63.5 mm) height and a horizontal septum. A reverse plain Dutch weave wire mesh screen of 128×36 mesh (PZ80) was used as the septum in the examples. Before starting a filtration test, the septum was precoated with slurry of filtration or stabilization and filtration media in clean water by recirculation though the filter. A beer to be stabilized and filtered was cooled down to 1-2° C. in an ice-bath, and the stabilization and filtration media were added to and mixed in the beer with agitation for 30 minutes. The conditioned beer in the ice-bath was then fed to the filter at a desired constant flow rate by a peristaltic pump. Temperature of the beer feed, pressure in the filter chamber, and filtrate turbidity were monitored throughout the test. The stabilized and filtered beer was analyzed for clarity at 0° C. by a Hach Ratio/XR Turbidimeter in nephelometric turbidity units (ntu) and the alcohol chill haze following the EBC procedure (EBC Analytica 9.41—Alcohol Chill Haze in Beer) described above.

[0077] Beer filtration capability of the regenerated media may be characterized by a comparison between the turbidity of a first filtrate that results from filtering a raw beer with the regenerated media and the turbidity of a second filtrate that results from filtering the same raw beer under the same conditions (temperature and filtration rate) with new media (of the same composition as the regenerated media) at the same dosage. The turbidity of the first and second filtrates was measured at 0° C. using a ratio turbidity meter. The rates of pressure increase are measured in psig per minute or millibar per minute during both filtration tests and compared against each other. The inventors have found that the turbidity of the beer filtrates produced using the regenerated media is 50-200% of the turbidity of beer filtrates produced using new media having the same composition as the regenerated media.

[0078] Regenerated stabilization and filtration media in the examples were also analyzed for other properties. New and regenerated silica stabilization media were characterized by their Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by heating in a muffle furnace at 1800° F. (982° C.) for 60 minutes. For samples containing free moisture, the LOI measurement also included loss on drying. Specific surface areas as determined by the nitrogen adsorption method based on the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) theory. In order not to induce pore structure collapse, sample preparation for surface area measurement for samples containing greater than 20% LOI were soaked in methanol for 2 hours, dried at 70° C. overnight and degassed at 110° C. for 2 hours with nitrogen gas purging. Otherwise, samples were dried at 120° C. overnight and then degassed with nitrogen purging at 150° C. for 2 hours. Permeability and wet bulk density (WBD) were determined using an EP Permeameter, for which the concept and basic design are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,878,374. The solubilities of arsenic, aluminum and iron were determined by following the extraction method of EBC Analytica 10.6 (the “EBC Extraction Method”), in which a powder sample is stirred in a 1 wt % aqueous solution of potassium phthalate, in a solid to liquid ratio of 2.5:100, for 2 hours at the ambient temperature followed by filtering the slurry through a paper filter. The concentration of the target elements in the filtrates were analyzed by the inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP) and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAA).

Example 1

[0079] Britesorb® D300 is a silica xerogel beer stabilization media from PQ Corporation. It contains silica xerogel and about 1.2 wt % magnesium according to the manufacturer. The sample used in this disclosure was determined to have about 13% LOI and a specific surface area of 298 m.sup.2/g. It was heated at various temperatures in a muffle furnace for 30 or 60 minutes. The mass loss on heating during the process and specific surface area of the thermally treated samples were determined and are listed in Table I. It can be seen that the major dehydration of this silica (xerogel) stabilization media occurred at temperatures of 1300° F. (704° C.) and lower, however, significant loss in surface area after heating for 30 minutes occurred at temperatures 1400° F. (760° C.) and higher. This indicates that at temperatures around or below 1300° F. (704° C.) the xerogel's pore structure and surface area can be mostly preserved.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE I Thermal Stability of Silica (Xerogel) Stabilization Media Britesorb ® D300 Heating ° F. 220 1000 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1750 1800 temperature ° C. 104 538 649 704 760 816 871 954 982 and time min 60 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 Mass loss, % 6.3 10.7 10.4 12.4 12.6 12.7 13.4 13.6 12.9 Surface area, m.sup.2/g 298 299 301 294 200 163 81 17 n/a

Example 2

[0080] The thermally-treated silica (xerogel) stabilization media samples from Example 1 were tested for their effectiveness in stabilizing a filtered but untreated (not stabilized) laboratory-brewed ale by mixing in an ice-bath shaker for 30 minutes. The silica (xerogel) stabilization media dosage was 1.0 g/L Britesorb® D300 or equivalent, i.e., the actual dosages of the thermally treated samples were adjusted for the mass loss on heating. The stabilized beer samples were analyzed for the EBC alcohol chill haze, and the results are listed in Table II. After heating at 1200 or 1300° F. (649 or 704° C.) for 30 minutes, the silica (xerogel) stabilization media performed almost or fully as well as new Britesorb® D300 for stabilizing the beer, as indicated by the 94 or 100% Regeneration Efficiency.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE II Laboratory-brewed Ale Stabilization by Thermally Treated Britesorb ® D300 Blank Britesorb ® Heated silica (xerogel) Test beer D300 stabilization media Heated @ ° F. N/A N/A 1200 1300 ° C.  649  704 Alcohol chill haze, ntu 603 177  196  176 ACHR, %  0  71  67  71 Regeneration Eff., % N/A N/A  94  100

Example 3

[0081] A sample of Britesorb® D300 was used to treat a filtered but untreated (not stabilized) laboratory-brewed ale (16 ntu at ambient temperature) at 1.0 g/L in an ice-bath by shaking for 30 minutes. The treated beer was centrifuged and the sediment was collected and dried in an oven to form a spent silica stabilization medium (in this Example 3, a “spent silica xerogel”). The spent silica xerogel was regenerated by heating in a muffle furnace for 30 minutes, optionally with the presence hydrogen peroxide (added as a 35% solution). The resulting regenerated silica (xerogel) stabilization medium was tested for beer stabilization at 1.0 g/L Britesorb® D300 equivalent by mixing in an ice-bath shaker for 30 minutes (Table III). The silica (xerogel) stabilization medium regenerated at 1300° F. (704° C.) performed as well as new Britesorb® D300 for stabilizing the beer, as indicated by the 99% Regeneration Efficiency. The addition of hydrogen peroxide further enhanced the performance and increased the Regeneration Efficiency to 107%. Those regenerated at lower temperatures, with the presence of hydrogen peroxide, had lower but higher than 75% Regeneration Efficiency.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE III Laboratory-brewed Ale Stabilizadon by Regenerated Britesorb ® D300 Blank Britesorb ® Regenerated Silica (xerogel) Test beer D300 Stabilization Medium Heated @ ° F. N/A N/A 1300 1300 1200 1100 1000 ° C. 704 704 649 593 538 H.sub.2O.sub.2, g/g N/A N/A 0 0.7 1.2 1.8 1.8 xerogel ACH, ntu 390 102 105 82 150 160 170 ACHR, %  0  74 73 79 62 59 56 Reg. Eff., % N/A N/A 99 107 83 80 76

Example 4

[0082] A lager beer was obtained from a commercial brewery. The beer had passed through the primary filtration stage but not through the stabilization and polish filtration unit processes. Britesorb® D300 was added to the beer at 1.0 g/L and mixing was carried out in an ice-bath shaker for 30 minutes. The treated beer was centrifuged and the sediment was collected and dried in oven to form a spent silica stabilization medium (in this Example 4, a “spent silica xerogel”. The spent silica xerogel was regenerated by heating in a muffle furnace at 1300° F. (704° C.) for 30 minutes. The resulting regenerated silica (xerogel) stabilization medium was tested for stabilization effectiveness in the same lager beer against new Britesorb® D300 at various addition rates (Table IV). The regenerated silica (xerogel) stabilization medium worked as well as the new silica (xerogel) stabilization medium in stabilizing the lager beer.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE IV Stabilization of Commercial Lager by Regenerated Britesorb ® D300 Blank Regen- Test beer Britesorb ® D300 erated Xerogel, g/L equiv. 0 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.00 Alcohol chill- 146 70 63 55 50 44 43 haze, ntu ACHR, % 0 52 57 62 66 70 71 Reg. Eff., % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 101

Example 5

[0083] This example demonstrates regeneration of another silica stabilization media, Daraclar® 1015 from W.R. Grace & Co. This silica stabilization medium is a silica xerogel. A sample used in this disclosure was determined to have about 5% LOI and a specific surface area of 336 m.sup.2/g. A 0.50-g sample of the silica (xerogel) stabilization medium, Daraclar® 1015, was mixed with 500 ml of an unstabilized and unfiltered commercial Belgian tripel of 150 ntu (at 5° C.) for 30 minutes, and the spent silica (xerogel) stabilization medium was recovered by centrifugation and vacuum filtration. The treated beer was filtered through a No. 1 filter paper by vacuum. The treated beer was determined to have an EBC alcohol chill haze of 36 ntu vs 134 ntu of the untreated beer (also centrifuged and filtered the same way).

[0084] The spent silica (xerogel) stabilization medium was dried at 110° C. for 2 hours, dispersed through a 100 mesh sieve, and regenerated by heating in a muffle furnace at either 1200 or 1300° F. (649 or 304° C.) for 20 to 40 minutes. The regenerated silica (xerogel) stabilization medium samples were tested for stabilization effectiveness in the same Belgian tripel against new Daraclar® 1015 at a dosage of, adjusted for LOI differences, 1.0 g/L Daraclar® 1015 equivalent. Stabilization was carried out by mixing the silica stabilization media in beer for 30 minutes in an ice bath shaker. The treated beer samples were centrifuged, filtered through #1 filter paper under vacuum and characterized for EBC alcohol chill haze. The test results are listed in Table V. It can be seen that the regenerated silica (xerogel) stabilization medium samples performed as well as or slightly better than new Daraclar® 1015 in stabilizing the Belgian tripel, and in this case the lower temperature (1200° F. or 649° C.) and shorter heating time (20 min.) provided for higher Regeneration Efficiency.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE V Belgian Tripel Stabilizadon with Regenerated Daraclar ® 1015 Xerogel Blank Daraclar ® Regenerated Silica (Xerogel) Test beer 1015 Stabilization Media Heating °F. N/A N/A 1200 1200 1200 1300 1300 °C.  649  649  649  704  704 min  20  30  40  20  30 ACH, ntu 110 32  20  21  24  25  28 ACHR, %  0 74  81  81  78  77  75 Regeneration N/A N/A  114  113  109  108  104 Eff., %

Example 6

[0085] Becosorb® 2500 is a silica stabilization medium that is a hydrated silica xerogel from Eaton Corp. A sample of the product was determined to have 41% LOI and a specific surface area of 282 m.sup.2/g. It was tested for stabilization effectiveness in a commercial dark pale ale that had not yet been stabilized or filtered and which had a turbidity of 83 ntu at 5° C. A 0.20-g sample of the Becosorb® 2500 silica stabilization medium was mixed with 100 ml of the beer in an ice-bath shaker for 30 minutes, and the spent silica stabilization medium was recovered by centrifugation and vacuum filtration through a 0.45-μ membrane. The spent silica stabilization medium was dried at 120° C. for 4.5 hours and then regenerated by heating in a muffle furnace at 1300° F. (304° C.) for 30 minutes. The regenerated silica (hydrated xerogel) stabilization medium was tested for stabilization effectiveness in the same dark pale ale against new Becosorb® 2500 at a dosage of, adjusted for LOI differences, 0.84 g/L Becosorb® 2500 equivalent, under otherwise the same conditions and following the same procedure as described above. The blank beer had an EBC alcohol chill haze of 240 ntu, and the beers treated with new and the regenerated silica (hydrated xerogel) stabilization medium had 154 and 157 ntu ACH or 66 and 64% ACHR, respectively. This demonstrates a Regeneration Efficiency of 97%.

Example 7

[0086] Daraclar® 920, from W.R. Grace & Co., is a silica stabilization media that is a silica hydrogel. A sample of the product was determined to have 63% LOI and a specific surface area of 1074 m.sup.2/g. It was tested for stabilization effectiveness in a commercial dark pale ale that had not been stabilized or filtered, which had a turbidity of 83 ntu at 5° C. A 0.20-g sample of the Daraclar® 920 was mixed with 100 ml of the beer for 30 minutes in an ice-bath shaker and the spent silica (hydrogel) stabilization media was recovered by centrifugation and vacuum filtration through a 0.45-μ membrane. The spent silica (hydrogel) stabilization media was dried at 120° C. for 4.5 hours and then regenerated by heating in a muffle furnace at 1300° F. (304° C.) for 30 minutes. The regenerated silica (hydrogel) stabilization media was tested for stabilization effectiveness in the same dark pale ale against new Daraclar® 920 at a dosage of, adjusted for LOI differences, 0.84 g/L Daraclar® 920 equivalent, under otherwise the same conditions and following the same procedure as described above. The blank beer had an EBC alcohol chill haze of 240 ntu, and the beers treated with new and the regenerated silica (hydrogel) stabilization media had 186 and 208 ntu ACH or 35 and 19% ACHR, respectively. This demonstrates a Regeneration Efficiency of 55%.

Example 8

[0087] This example demonstrates the beer stabilization performance of a mixture comprising silica stabilization media and diatomite filtration media, in which such mixture had been regenerated from a beer spent cake comprising straight calcined diatomite (filtration media) and silica xerogel (silica stabilization media). The spent cake was generated by stabilization and filtration of 2.5 liter of a laboratory-brewed ale using a bench scale pressure filter. It contained 1.00 g of Celatom® FP-3, a straight calcined diatomite filtration media, as filtration precoat and 2.50 g each of Celatom® FP-3 and Britesorb® D300 as body-feed. Therefore, the spent cake had a silica xerogel to diatomite ratio of 1:1.4 by weight. The spent cake was dried in oven overnight at 110° C., and the dried spent cake had an LOI of 17.6%. It was dispersed through a 100-mesh screen and heated at 1300° F. (704° C.) for 30 minutes for regeneration. The regenerated media had 3.8% LOI and about 0.43 g/g or about 43 wt % Britesorb® D300 equivalent silica xerogel. It was tested for stabilization effectiveness in a laboratory-brewed ale against a benchmark of 1:1 mixture of Britesorb® D300 and Celatom® FP-3 (Table VI). The regenerated media, at silica xerogel dosage 5% below the benchmark, worked similarly as the mixture of new silica xerogel and diatomite in stabilizing the beer.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE VI Laboratory-brewed Ale Stabilization by Regenerated Silica Xerogel and Diatomite Media, g/L Stabilization Britesorb ® Celatom ® D300 ACH ACHR ARE Test D300 FP-3 Regenerated equivalent ntu % % Blank 0 0 0 0 455 0 N/A Benchmark 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 116 75 N/A Regenerated 0 0 0.97 0.95 123 73 103

Example 9

[0088] This example demonstrates the stabilization and filtration performance of a mixture comprising silica stabilization media and diatomite filtration media regenerated from a beer spent cake comprising silica xerogel and straight calcined diatomite. The mixture also included a small amount of new silica xerogel stabilization media to compensate for the lower content of silica xerogel in the regenerated media due to dilution by diatomite precoat that did not include silica xerogel. A 4-liter laboratory-brewed ale was split into two equal samples. One split, used in the benchmark run, was stabilized and filtered in a bench scale pressure filter at 30 ml/min, using 1.00 g Celatom® FP-3 as precoat and Britesorb® D300 and Celatom® FP-3 as body-feed at 1.00 and 1.25 g/L, respectively. The other split was tested under the same conditions with regenerated media (produced from a prior stabilization and filtration test using the same new filtration and stabilization media). The regenerated media had a silica xerogel to diatomite ratio of 1:1.4, contained 0.42 g/g or 42 wt % Britesorb® D300 equivalent silica xerogel and 5.7% LOI. In the test using the regenerated media, 1.00 g new Celatom® FP-3 was used in precoat, and 2.10 g/L of the regenerated media was used as body-feed, plus 0.10 g/L of new Britesorb® D300 (new media adjustment) to raise the silica xerogel to diatomite ratio back to 1:1.25 as prescribed. The experimental conditions and the test results are listed in Table VII. The combination of the regenerated media and the new media adjustment produced a filtrate with clarity and EBC alcohol chill haze similar to those produced using the new media, demonstrating a Regeneration Efficiency of 100%. Filtration pressure slope of the run with the regenerated media was only about 62% of that of the benchmark run, indicating the potential capability of the combination of regenerated media and the new media adjustment to provide for a much longer filtration cycle time.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE VII Stabilization and Filtration Using Regenerated Silica Xerogel and Straight Calcined Diatomite Body-feed, g/L Filtration Stabilization Total mbar/ ntu @ ACH ACHR ARE Test FP-3 D300 Regenerated xerogel min 0° C. ntu % % Blank N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 85 118 N/A N/A Benchmark 1.25 1.00 0 1.00 53 4.4 9.0 92 N/A Regenerated* 0 0.10 2.10 0.98 33 6.4 9.3 92 102 *combination of regenerated media and new media adjustment

Example 10

[0089] This example demonstrates the stabilization and filtration performance of stabilization and filtration media regenerated from a beer spent cake comprising silica xerogel and flux-calcined diatomite. A small amount, as shown in table below, of new silica xerogel stabilization media (new media adjustment) was added to the regenerated media to rebalance the ratio between silica xerogel and diatomite. A 6-liter laboratory-brewed ale was divided into two equal splits, and one was used in the benchmark run. It was stabilized and filtered in a bench scale pressure filter at 40 ml/min using Britesorb® D300 and Celatom® FW-14, a flux-calcined diatomite, as body-feed in the 1:1 ratio. Due to the pressure limitation, the test was run in two subtests of 1.5-liter, each using 1.00 g Celatom® FW-14 as precoat. After drying and dispersion, the spent cake from this test was regenerated by heating at 1300° F. (704° C.) for 30 minutes in a muffle furnace, and the regenerated material had a silica xerogel to diatomite ratio of 3:5 (including two precoats), 0.39 g/g or 39 wt % Britesorb® D300 equivalent silica xerogel and 2.1% LOI. It was used to treat the other beer split at a dosage of 1.55 g/L under the same conditions. The filtration test was run in two equal subtests, each with 1.00 g Celatom® FW-14 as precoat. New Britesorb® D300 of 0.41 g/L (new media adjustment) was added to the body-feed to raise the ratio of silica xerogel to diatomite to 1:1 as prescribed. The experimental conditions and the test results are listed in Table VIII. The combination of regenerated media and the new media adjustment produced a filtrate with clarity and EBC alcohol chill haze similar to those produced with the new media, demonstrating a regeneration efficiency of 100%. The filtration pressure slope of the run with the regenerated media was only about 64% of that of the benchmark run, indicating the that the combination of regenerated media and the new media adjustment is likely to provide for a longer filtration cycle time.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE VIII Stabilization-Filtration Using Regenerated Silica Xerogel and Flux-calcined Diatomite Body-feed, g/L Filtration Stabilization Total mbar/ ntu @ ACH ACHR ARE Test FW-14 D300 Regenerated xerogel min 0° C. ntu % % Blank N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 78 120 N/A N/A Benchmark 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 76 4.8 10.3 91 N/A Regenerated* 0 0.41 1.55 1.01 49 6.3 9.2 92 100 *combination of regenerated media and new media adjustment

Example 11

[0090] This example demonstrates the stabilization and filtration performance of a filtration and stabilization media regenerated from a beer spent cake comprising silica xerogel and expanded and milled perlite. A 4-liter laboratory-brewed ale was divided into two equal splits, and one split was used in the benchmark run. It was stabilized and filtered in a bench scale pressure filter at 30 ml/min, using 0.60 g Celatom® CP-600P, an expanded and milled perlite, as precoat and Britesorb® D300 and Celatom® CP-600P as body-feed in the 1:1 ratio by weight. After drying and dispersion, the spent filter cake was regenerated by heating at 1300° F. (704° C.) for 30 minutes in a muffle furnace. The regenerated media had a silica xerogel to perlite ratio of 1:1.4, contained 0.44 g/g or 44 wt % Britesorb® D300 equivalent silica xerogel and 0.6% LOI. The second beer split was treated with the regenerated media as body-feed, supplemented with 0.22 g/L of Britesorb® D300 (new media adjustment) to increase the silica xerogel to perlite ratio to 1:1 as prescribed, and using 0.60 g Celatom® CP-600P as precoat, with the rest of conditions the same as the benchmark test. The experimental conditions and the test results are listed in Table IX. The combination of regenerated media and the new media adjustment produced a filtrate of slightly lower clarity (higher turbidity) at 41% of the pressure slope of the benchmark. A little more dispersion during regeneration to produce a slightly less permeable product would be expected to increase filtrate clarity without a pressure increase higher than that of the benchmark run. EBC alcohol chill haze of the filtrate from the regenerated run was similar to the benchmark run. Both produced about 91% alcohol chill haze reduction, with the regenerated run showing a 99% regeneration efficiency.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE IX Stabilization and Filtration Using Regenerated Silica Xerogel and Expanded Perlite. Body-feed, g/L Filtration Stabilization Total mbar/ ntu @ ACH ACHR ARE Test CP-600P D300 Regenerated xerogel min 0° C. ntu % % Blank N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 120 200 N/A N/A Benchmark 0.75 0.75 0 0.75 44 7.5 17.4 91 N/A Regenerated* 0 0.22 1.22 0.76 18 11.5 18.9 91 99 *combination of regenerated media and new media adjustment

Example 12

[0091] This example demonstrates the stabilization and filtration performance of a media regenerated from a beer spent cake containing Celite Cynergy®. Celite Cynergy is a stabilizing-filtration media of modified diatomite. The modified diatomite stabilizing-filtration media is a composite comprising diatomite filtration media and silica stabilization media. A 4-liter laboratory-brewed ale beer was divided into two equal splits, and one was stabilized and filtered in a bench scale pressure filter using Celite Cynergy at 30 ml/min. After drying and dispersion, the spent cake from this benchmark was regenerated by heating at 1300° F. (704° C.) in a muffle furnace for 30 minutes. The regenerated media had 0.54% LOI vs 1.3% LOI for the new Celite Cynergy. It was used to treat the second beer split under the same conditions. The experimental conditions and the test results are listed in Table X. In both tests, 1.00 g new Celite Cynergy was used in precoat. The regenerated media produced a filtrate with the same clarity and better EBC alcohol chill haze at the same rate of pressure increase. A Regeneration Efficiency of 101% was demonstrated.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE X Stabilization-Filtration by Regenerated Celite Cynergy ® Body-feed, g/L Filtration Stabilization Regen- mbar/ ntu @ ACH ACHR ARE Test Cynergy ® erated min 0° C. ntu % % Blank N/A N/A N/A 79 140 N/A N/A Benchmark 4.0 0 21 2.1 8.3 94 N/A Regenerated 0 4.0 20 2.0 6.4 96 101

Example 13

[0092] This is an example of regenerating a commercial beer spent cake comprising stabilization and filtration media. The spent cake sample was generated from processing an Indian pale ale and comprised Britesorb® XLC silica xerogel (silica stabilization media) and Celatom® FW-12 diatomite (filtration media) in a ratio of 4 to 25 by weight. The media used in the process, Britesorb® XLC and Celatom® FW-12 had 7.8% and 0.4% LOI, respectively. The whole batch of the spent cake was collected, dewatered by pressure filtration, dried and then dispersed through a hammer mill with an open discharge. The dispersed spent cake was sieved through a 100 mesh screen to remove a small amount of coarse particles. The processed spent cake had 11.2% LOI.

[0093] Small samples of the spent cake were tested for regeneration by heating in a muffle furnace at 1300° F. (704° C.) in a cold or preheated ceramic tray at various batch loadings for varying durations. Properties of the regenerated media are listed in Table XI, showing varying permeability, wet bulk density and LOI. The regenerated media were tested for stabilization effectiveness in a commercial dark pale ale against the new media (benchmarks) at the same dosages and the results are listed in Table XII. All regenerated media had alcohol chill haze reduction within ±20% of the new media (benchmarks). It should be noted that, adjusted for lower LOIs in the regenerated media, the equivalent silica xerogel dosages in the tests using the regenerated media were about 20% higher than those of the benchmarks. After factoring in the difference in equivalent dosage of silica xerogel used, the regeneration efficiency was calculated to be between 70-102%. At 1300° F. (704° C.), heating for 10 minutes in a hot tray produced the best regeneration efficiency (sample 22-6) for this spent cake.

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE XI India Pale Ale Spent Cake Regeneration at 704° C. Regeneration Test 22-5 22-8 22-4 22-6 22-7 22-9 22-10 Tray Cold Cold Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot g/batch 97 50 200 99 50 50 30 min 15 5 30 10 5 2 1.5 Regenerated media Permeability, 0.91 0.69 1.56 1.26 1.17 1.12 1.06 Darcy Wet Bulk lbs/ft.sup.3 21.1 21.1 18.1 19.3 19.8 19.9 20.4 Density g/cm.sup.3 0.34 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.33 LOI, % 0.57 1.00 0.22 0.51 0.36 0.48 0.69

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE XII Stabilization of Dark Pale Ale by Regenerated Media Test 1: Beer - 110 ntu @ 5° C. Test-2: Beer - 88 ntu @ 5° C. Stabilization Bench Bench Media Blank mark 22-4 22-5 22-6 Blank mark 22-7 22-8 22-9 22-10 FW-12, g/L 0 3.00 0 0 0 0 3.00 0 0 0 0 XLC, g/L 0 0.50 0 0 0 0 0.50 0 0 0 0 Regenerated, g/L 0 0 3.50 3.50 3.50 0 0 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Xerogel eq., g/L 0 0.50 0.61 0.60 0.60 0 0.50 0.61 0.60 0.60 0.60 ACH, ntu 210 110 120 101 87 205 83 92 74 95 102 ACHR, % 0 48 43 52 59 0 60 55 64 54 50 ARE, % N/A N/A 74 90 102 N/A N/A 77 89 75 70

Example 14

[0094] A few regenerated media of Example 13 were tested for stabilization effectiveness and filtration performance in a dark pale ale that had not been stabilized or filtered against a mixture of new media (benchmark), i.e., Britesorb® XLC silica xerogel (silica stabilization media) and Celatom® FW-12 diatomite (filtration media). The Celatom® FW-12 diatomite used in this test had 0.73 Darcy permeability and 20.9 lbs/ft.sup.3 (0.33 g/cm.sup.3) wet bulk density. The same Celatom® FW-12 was used in precoat at 1.00 g per batch. The raw beer had a turbidity of 32-40 ntu at 5° C. and 240-250 ntu EBC alcohol chill haze. Each test processed 2 L of the beer at a constant flow rate of 40 ml/min. The test conditions and results are listed in Table XIII. The beers treated with the regenerated media, after stabilization and filtration, had turbidities (at 0° C.) that were 20-45% lower than that of the benchmark filtrate. EBC alcohol chill hazes of the beers processed with the regenerated media were within a ±6% of the benchmark filtrate. The pressure slopes of the tests using the regenerated media were only about 20-55% of that of the benchmark test. It should be noted that the comparative tests were carried out under the basis of equal weight of body-feed media. Changes in LOIs of the media made difference in the actual usage of each component. With these corrections, the regenerated media runs used 5% more Celatom® FW-12 equivalent and 20% less silica xerogel equivalent relative to the benchmark. Based on the equivalent silica gel dosage, the regenerated media had 103-138% regeneration efficiency as determined by stabilization of this beer.

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE XIII Stabilization-Filtration of Dark Pale Ale by Regenerated Media Body-feed, g/L Filtration Stabilization Regen- FW-12 BS XLC mbar/ ntu @ ACH ACHR ARE Test FW-12 BS XLC erated equiv.* equiv.* min 0° C. ntu % % Blank N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 87-102 240-250 N/A N/A Benchmark 1.20 0.25 0 1.20 0.25 9.5 19.2 150 40 N/A 22-5 0 0 1.45 1.26 0.20 3.1 10.5 140 44 138 22-6 0 0 1.45 1.26 0.20 1.9 15.5 160 33 103 22-8 0 0 1.45 1.26 0.20 5.2 11.4 158 34 106 *Adjusted for LOI in new and regenerated media.

Example 15

[0095] A beer spent cake was collected from a German brewery. In the stabilization and filtration cycle the spent cake was formed, and a total of 37 kg of flux-calcined diatomite Celatom® FW-14, 150 kg of straight calcined diatomite Celatom® FP-3, 43 kg of silica xerogel Becosorb® 1000 and 3 kg of PVPP were used to process 971 hL of beer. The spent cake therefore contained silica xerogel and diatomite in a ratio of about 1:4 by weight. The spent cake was dewatered, dried and dispersed through a hammer mill. The resulting powder had about 14% LOI.

[0096] The dried and dispersed spent cake was run through the regeneration process of the current disclosure in a laboratory rotary electrical tube furnace made by Sentro Tech Corp., model STTR-1500C-3-024, equipped with a 3″ (76 mm) internal diameter high temperature alloy steel tube, with a hot zone length of 24″ (610 mm). The tube was tilted to an 11% slope and operated at 4.5 rpm. A knocking device was added to assist in dislodging material from the wall of the heated tube. The dried and dispersed spent cake was fed to the tube continuously with a volumetric feeder at a rate of 9.5 g/min, and the regenerated product was collected at the discharge end of the tube. The regeneration process was tested at temperatures of 1300 and 1350° F. (704 and 732° C.). The regenerated products were characterized by permeability, wet bulk density. LOI and specific surface area (Table XIV), and are compared to a mixture of Becosorb® 1000 and Celatom® FP-3. They were also tested for stabilizing a commercial Belgian tripel against a mixture of Becosorb® 1000 and Celatom® FP-3 at 1:4 by weight. The regenerated media performed as well as or slightly better than the benchmark in stabilizing a 120 ntu (at 5° C.) unstabilized Belgian tripel at a dosage of 2.5 g/L, unadjusted for LOI, showing regeneration efficiencies of 99-106%.

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE XIV Rotary Tube Furnace Regeneration of German Beer Spent Cake Regeneration New or Regenerated Media Surface Perm. WBD WBD LOI area, Test ° F. ° C. mDarcy lbs/ft.sup.3 g/cm.sup.3 % m.sup.2/g Becosorb ® 1000 N/A N/A 51 24.7 0.40 11.8 288 Celatom ® FP-3 N/A N/A 227 22.8 0.37 0.5 2.2 Benchmark* N/A N/A 141 24.0 0.38 3.3 59 Regenerated-1 1300 704 188 22.9 0.37 1.9 61 Regenerated-2 1350 732 208 22.5 0.36 0.5 50 *A mixture of Becosorh ® 1000 and Celatom ® FP-3 at 1:4 by weight, calculated LOI and specific surface area from component values.

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE XV Belgian Tripel Stabilization by Rotary Furnace Regenerated Media Media, g/L Stabilization Becosorb ® Celatom ® Regen- Xerogel ACH ACHR ARE Test 1000 FP-3 erated Equivalent ntu % % Blank 0 0 0 0 146 0 N/A Benchmark 0.50 2.00 0 0.50 66 55 N/A Regenerated-1 0 0 2.50 0.56 58 61 99 Regenerated-2 0 0 2.50 0.56 51 65 106

[0097] Regeneration Efficiencies of the spent media for stabilizing beers listed in above examples are summarized in Table XVI. The silica stabilization media include silica xerogel, hydrated or hydrous gel, and hydrogel. Modified diatomite stabilizing filtration media is also included in the results. The regenerated media are either silica gel or comprise silica gel and filtration media (diatomite or expanded perlite). The beers tested included varieties of ale and a lager. The Regeneration Efficiency in these examples varied from 55 to about 140%.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE XVI Regeneration Efficiency for Beer Stabilization - Summary Stabilization Silica gel Filtration Media Ratio RE or Example Type Grade* Media Stabilization:Filtration Beer ARE % 2, 3 Xerogel BS D300 Ale  76-107 4 Xerogel BS D300 Lager 101 5 Xerogel DRC 1015 Tripel 104-114 6 Hydrated BCS 2500 Pale Ale  97 7 Hydrogel DRC 920 Pale Ale  55 8 Xerogel BS D300 Calcined DE 1:1 Ale 103 9 Xerogel BS D300 Calcined DE 4:5 Ale 102 10 Xerogel BS D300 Fluxed DE 1:1 Ale 102 11 Xerogel BS D300 Exp'd Perlite 1:1 Ale  99 12 Modified DE Cynergy Modified DE N/A Ale 101 13, 14 Xerogel BS XLC Fluxed DE  4:25 IPA  70-138 15 Xerogel BCS 1000 Calcined DE 1:4 Tripel  99-106 *BS - Britesorb ®; DRC - Daraclar ®; BCS - Becosorb ®.

Example 17

[0098] Spent cakes which had previously been regenerated and evaluated (in Examples 9, 10 and 11) were again regenerated by the same method. Listed in Table XVII are certain properties of these twice regenerated materials, as compared to new media and their mixtures of the same ratios. It can be seen that the resulting combination of regenerated media and new media adjustment (as per the method of Examples 9, 10 and 11) has higher permeability than and similar wet bulk density as the corresponding mixtures of new media. The higher permeability explains the lower pressure increase during filtration, and similar wet bulk density indicates good integrity of the particles enduring the regeneration process. Specific surface area of the resulting combination (of regenerated media and new media adjustment as per the method of Examples 9, 10 and 11) similar to the new media indicates retained pore structure of silica xerogel stabilization media and inorganic filter media. Also shown are the significantly reduced solubilities of arsenic, aluminum and iron in the combination (of regenerated media and new media adjustment) as compared to the corresponding mixtures of the same compositions. This indicates that these soluble elements are mostly dissolved during the first use of the media, and subsequent filtration cycles using mostly the regenerated media cause much less metal and arsenic dissolution into beer, which is sometimes beneficial for beer stability and flavor.

TABLE-US-00017 TABLE XVII Properties of 2-Time. Regenerated Media vs. New Media Surface Perm. WBD Area EBC Solubility, ppm* Sample and Composition Ex. no. mD g/cm.sup.3 m.sup.2/g As Al Fe Britesorb ® D300 n/a 28 0.33 298 <0.1 1.5 0.5 Celatom ® FP-3 n/a 227 0.37 2.2 3 43 69 Celatom ® FW-14 n/a 1240 0.34 0.68 1 23 78 Celatom ® CP-600P n/a 613 0.20 1.3 0.5 133 37 Mix: FP-3/D300 (65/35) n/a 116 0.36 106 2 28 45 Regenerated: FP-3/D300 (65/35)  9 142 0.36 94 0.1 8 19 Mix: FP-3/D300 (63/37) n/a 243 0.38 111 0.7 15 49 Regenerated: FW-14/D300 (63/37) 10 409 0.38 111 0.2 5 15 Mix: CP-600P/D300 (58/42) n/a 295 0.27 126 0.3 78 22 Regenerated: CP-600P/D300 (58/42) 11 n/a n/a n/a 0.1 26 16 *Calculated values for mixtures of new media determined using the EBC Extraction Method.

Example 18

[0099] This example demonstrates how permeability of a regenerated media can be adjusted by mixing with a new media to meet the requirement of filtration performance. A regenerated product comprising diatomite Celatom® FP-3 (filtration media) and silica xerogel Becosorb® 1000 (silica stabilization media) in a ratio of 4:25 (Example 13. Sample 22-4 in Table XI) had a much higher permeability as compared to a mixture of the same new media in the same ratio. A fine natural diatomite of 0.8 mDarcy permeability and 32.9 lbs/ft.sup.3 (0.53 g/cm.sup.3) wet bulk density was mixed with the regenerated product. Through this procedure, the permeabilities of the mixtures comprising regenerated media were reduced and closely matched that of the level of the mixture of new media (Table XVIII) when the natural diatomite additive comprised 10% of the regenerated media.

TABLE-US-00018 TABLE XVIII Permeability Adjustment of Regenerated Media Fine DE Permeability WBD Sample Addition, % Darcy g/cm.sup.3 Regenerated Media 0 1.56 0.29 Regenerated Media 5 1.04 0.31 Regenerated Media 10 0.48 0.33 Mix: BCS1000/FP-3 = 4/25 0 0.51 0.33

Example 19

[0100] A flux-calcined diatomite, Celatom® FW-12, lot 2D12F6, made from selected ores using special formulations, was determined to contain about 4% opal-C, no cristobalite and <0.1% quartz or a total content of crystalline silica of <1% by the method of PCT/US16/37830. PCT/US16/37816 and PCT/US16/37826, each by Lenz et al., described below.

[0101] Per Lenz et al. (PCT/US16/37830, PCT/US16/37816 and PCT/US16/37826), one relatively simple way to confirm the absence of cristobalite within a sample is to spike the sample (add a known amount of) with cristobalite standard reference material (i.e. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material 1879A), run XRD analysis on the spiked sample and then compare the original un-spiked sample diffraction pattern with the spiked sample pattern. If the spiked sample diffraction pattern simply increases the intensity of the primary and secondary peaks but does not show a position shift or show additional peaks, then the original sample most likely contains cristobalite. If the primary peak shifts and becomes sharper (or resolves into two separate peaks), and secondary peaks appear or become much better defined, then opal-C (and/or opal-CT) and not cristobalite is present in the original sample.

[0102] To determine whether a sample of a product that includes diatomite contains cristobalite or opal-C (and/or opal-CT) and then to quantify the opal-C (and/or opal-CT) and/or crystalline silica content involves a number of steps according to the Improved Method disclosed in Lenz et al. (PCT/US16/37830. PCT/US16/37816 and PCT/US16/37826), and referred to in Lenz et al, as the “LH Method.”

[0103] First, it is determined whether the sample contains water of hydration via high temperature loss on ignition testing. For example, a (representative) first portion of the sample is obtained and loss on ignition testing is performed on such first portion.

[0104] Second, bulk powder X-ray Diffraction is performed, and the resulting (first) diffraction pattern inspected. For example, preferably, a (representative) second portion of the sample is obtained and bulk powder XRD is performed on the second portion. Preferably, the second portion is milled prior to XRD. The resulting (first) diffraction pattern is analyzed for the presence or absence of opal-C (and/or opal-CT) and cristobalite. The resulting (first) diffraction pattern may also be analyzed for the presence or absence of other crystalline silica phases (for example, quartz and tridymite) within the (representative) second portion of the sample. If the (first) diffraction pattern is obviously indicative of opal-C (or opal-CT), then further analysis is not required to determine whether the sample contains cristobalite or opal-C (and/opal-CT). The opal-C (and/or opal-CT) diffraction pattern differs from that of α-cristobalite in the following ways: the primary peak (22°) and the secondary peak (36°) are at higher d-spacing (lower 20 angle), there is a broader primary peak for opal-C (and/or opal-CT) as measured using the “Full Width at Half Maximum” (FWHM) statistic, opal-C (and/or opal-CT) has poorly-defined peaks at 31.50° and 28.49° 2θ, and a much more significant amorphous background.

[0105] If the (first) diffraction pattern is questionable with regard to whether opal-C (and/or opal-CT) and/or cristobalite is present, then according to the LH Method a second XRD analysis is performed to determine whether opal-C (and/or opal-CT) and/or cristobalite is present. This time the analysis is performed on, preferably, another representative portion of the sample spiked with cristobalite standard reference material (NIST 1879a). For example, a (representative) third portion of the sample is obtained and then spiked with cristobalite standard reference material (NIST 1879a) and XRD is performed on the third portion. The resulting (second) diffraction pattern from the XRD on the third portion is analyzed. Preferably, the third portion is milled prior to XRD. If the original sample (for example, the representative second portion of) comprises opal-C (and/or opal-CT), the cristobalite spike significantly modifies the diffraction pattern (from that of the second portion) with additional peaks identifiable at 22.02° and 36.17° 2θ, along with more prominent peaks at 31.50° and 28.49° 2θ seen in the (second) diffraction pattern of the third portion. If the original sample (more specifically, the second portion of) comprises cristobalite, then addition of the cristobalite spike (to the third portion) only results in increased peak intensity and no other significant change from the (first) diffraction pattern of the second portion (as seen in the (second) diffraction pattern of the third portion).

[0106] Quantifying the opal-C (and/or opal-CT) content of a diatomite sample can be complicated as its diffraction pattern is a combination of broad peaks and amorphous background, and diatomite products often contain other x-ray amorphous phases in addition to opal. According to the LH Method, an estimate of the quantity is obtained by treating the opal-C (and/or opal-CT) peaks (collectively, if both phases are present) of the first diffraction pattern as if they are cristobalite and quantifying against cristobalite standards such as NIST 1879a. This method of quantification of opal-C (and/or opal-CT), which Lenz et al. (PCT/US16/37830, PCT/US16/37816 and PCT/US16/37826) calls the XRD Method, will usually underestimate the opal-C (and/or opal-CT) content but is effective for a number of purposes, such as manufacturing quality control. For clarity, this XRD Method is part of the umbrella LH Method. Alternatively (under the LH Method), a measure may be obtained by heating a representative portion of the sample (for example, a fourth portion) at very high temperature (e.g., 1050° C.) for an extended period (for example 24 to 48 hours) until that heated portion is fully dehydrated. This completely dehydrates opaline phases and forms cristobalite (reduces amorphous background component). XRD analysis is then performed on the fourth portion and the cristobalite in the resulting (third) diffraction pattern of the fourth portion can be quantified against the cristobalite standards to give an estimate of original opal-C (and/or opal-CT) content. Preferably, the fourth portion is milled prior to XRD. As long as additional flux is not added prior to heating the fourth portion, and the temperature kept below 1400° C., any quartz present in the fourth portion will not be converted to cristobalite.

[0107] To obtain the total crystalline silica content wt % of the sample according to the LH Method, the weight percentage of the identified cristobalite (if any), the weight percentage of the quartz (if any) and the weight percentage of tridymite (if any) are added together to calculate the total weight percentage of the crystalline silica content in the sample. To obtain the weight percentage of quartz or tridymite found to be present during the analysis of the (first) diffraction pattern of the second portion of the sample, each of quartz or tridymite may be compared to its respective standard (for example, NIST SRM 1878b for quartz) for quantification of the content, or be quantified through the use of an internal standard (such as corundum) and applicable relative intensity ratios. If it is determined by the LH Method that cristobalite is present, the cristobalite seen in the (first) diffraction pattern of the second portion of the sample, may be compared to its respective standard (for example NIST 1879a) for quantification of the content, or be quantified through the use of an internal standard (such as corundum) and applicable relative intensity ratios. In the unusual case where there is both opal-C (or opal-CT) and cristobalite present and the primary peak of the opal-C (or opal-CT) cannot be differentiated or de-convoluted from that of cristobalite, the opal-C (or opal-CT) and cristobalite are quantified as one phase and reported as cristobalite. The quantity of cristobalite thus reported will be higher than the actual quantity in the sample. Because the sample is a representative sample of the product, the total weight percentage of the crystalline silica content in the sample is considered to accurately represent the total weight percentage of the crystalline silica content in the product from which the sample was taken.

[0108] In Lenz et al. (PCT/US16/37830. PCT/US16/37816 and PCT/US16/37826), the bulk powder XRD work detailed was performed using a Siemens® D5000 diffractometer controlled with MDI™ Datascan5 software, with CuKα radiation, sample spinning, graphite monochromator, and scintillation detector. Power settings were at 50 KV and 36 mA, with step size at 0.04° and 4 seconds per step. JADE™ (2010) software was used for analyses of XRD scans. Sample preparation included SPEX® milling in zirconia vials with zirconia grinding media.

[0109] Continuing on with the discussion of Example 19, this diatomite filtration media, Celatom® FW-12, lot 2D12F6, was used, together with a silica xerogel. Britesorb® XLC (silica stabilization media), to treat 2 liters of a commercial dark pale ale of 91 ntu turbidity at 5° C., at usages of 1.00 and 0.25 g/L respectively, by mixing in an ice bath shaker for 30 minutes. After the treatment, the spent media was concentrated by centrifugation and then recovered from the beer by vacuum filtration through a 0.45-μm membrane. The filter cake was dried at 120° C. overnight, and the dried spent media was determined to have an LOI of 14%. It was regenerated by heating at 1300° F. (704° C.) in a muffle furnace for 30 minutes. The regenerated media was tested for stabilization effectiveness in a commercial dark pale ale that had not been stabilized or filtered and which had a turbidity of 78 ntu (at 5° C.), against a benchmark containing the same ratio of stabilization and filtration media that was used to generate the spent media. At a usage of 1.25 g/L, the regenerated media reduced the EBC alcohol chill haze of the beer from 230 ntu (blank) to 140 ntu vs 138 ntu for the benchmark. The stabilization capability of the spent media was thus fully regenerated, and the regenerated media contained no cristobalite and <0.1% quartz as analyzed by the same method. This example demonstrates that the thermal regeneration process of this disclosure does not increase the content of crystalline silica in silica spent stabilization and/or filtration media.

Example 20

[0110] Contamination of food or beverage products by micro-organisms can be a significant health risk. As a result, it is important that stabilization and processing media used in food and beverage processing be free of contamination. This is an important consideration for regenerated media which have been previously exposed to food and beverages.

[0111] Two samples of regenerated media were sent to Analytical Laboratories in Boise, Id., USA, in order to characterize them for microbiological matter content. To run the microbiological analyses, 225 ml of sterile Butterfield's phosphate buffered dilution water was added to 25 g of each sample (1:10 dilution) and the two was mixed for 30 seconds. For each test a 1-ml aliquot of the suspension was pipetted to a standard agar plate for incubation under required conditions for a set period of time. The total numbers of colonies formed by the end of incubation were counted. All methods had a detection limit of 10 colony-forming unit per gram of a solid sample (CFU/g), or 1 CFU per 1 ml of 1:10 dilution (0.1 g of a sample being analyzed).

[0112] The methods used for analyzing molds and yeasts followed the American Public Health Association Method for the Microbiological Examination of Foods (4.sup.th Edition). The method described below for both the mold and yeast analyses will be called the method of the American Public Health Association for the Microbiological Examination of Foods or the “APHA MEF Method”. According to the APHA MEF Method used for the molds analyses and for yeasts analyses, chloramphenicol, an antibiotic, was added to the standard agar and the latter was solidified in plate before the sample dilution was pipetted to and spread over, and incubation was carried out in the dark at room temperature at 25° C. (+/−0.5° C.) for five days. The mold and yeast colonies were counted at the end of incubation.

[0113] The “Aerobic Plate Count” method of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8.sup.th Edition, was followed for both aerobic and anaerobic plate count analyses. The method described below for the aerobic and anaerobic bacteria analyses is referred to herein as the method of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual or the “USFDA Method”. If conducted for aerobic bacteria analyses, it may be referred to herein as the USFDA Method for aerobic plate. If conducted for anaerobic bacteria analyses, it may be referred to as the USFDA Method for anaerobic plate. According to the USFDA Method for aerobic plate, the sample dilution was pipetted to and mixed with the standard agar (without chloramphenicol) before it solidified and the set plates were incubated at 35° C. (+/−1° C.) for 48 hours (+/−2 hours) (in atmosphere). The aerobic bacteria colonies were counted at the end of incubation.

[0114] The same USFDA Method was adopted for the anaerobic plate analysis, except that the set plate was placed in an anaerobic chamber filled with carbon dioxide. More specifically, the sample dilution was pipetted to and mixed with the standard agar (without chloramphenicol) before it solidified and the set plates were incubated in an anaerobic chamber (filled with carbon dioxide) at 35° C. (+/−1° C.) for 48 hours (+/−2 hours). The anaerobic bacteria colonies were counted at the end of incubation.

[0115] The analytical results are listed in Table XIX. On these two samples of regenerated media, according to the analyst, in no case a single colony was observed on the agar growth media that contained a slurry containing 0.1 g of a powder sample being analyzed. The results were reported as <10 CFU/g, which is below the detection limit of the tests methods. In other words, neither regenerated media contained a detectable amount of aerobic or anaerobic bacteria or molds or live yeasts.

TABLE-US-00019 TABLE XIX Reported Microbiological Matter in Regenerated Media Aerobic Anaerobic Live Plate Plate Yeast Count Count Mold Cell Sample CFU/g CFU/g CFU/g CFU/g Rotary furnace regenerated <10 <10 <10 <10 German ale spent cake Muffle furnace regenerated <10 <10 <10 <10 US lager spent cake

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

[0116] The teachings of the present disclosure may be practiced on the industrial scale for regenerating spent media from fluid stabilization and clarification. In particular, the teachings of the present disclosure may be practiced in beer breweries or facilities making other types of fermented beverages in which a silica stabilization media is used to stabilize protein-induced chill haze. According to the process disclosed herein, spent media from stabilization, or stabilization and filtration processes of fermented beverages is heated in an oxidizing environment to form regenerated spent (fermented beverage) media. The thermal treatment removes proteins and other organic matter. Prior to the thermal treatment, the spent media may be collected/accumulated, dewatered by filtration or centrifugation, and dried and dispersed.

[0117] In some embodiments, the spent media may be stored prior to thermal treatment (heating for regeneration). Furthermore, prior to the thermal treatment, the spent fermented beverage media may be segregated to obtain spent media for thermal treatment that has a substantially uniform (plus or minus 10%) permeability. In other embodiments, the spent fermented beverage media may be segregated according to wider or narrower permeability range. In some embodiments, prior to the thermal treatment, the spent fermented beverage media may be segregated by stabilization media content or extractable chemistry.

[0118] The drying process may be carried out in an industrial oven, a tray drier, a rotary dryer or a flash dryer. The dried material may be dispersed in a controlled gentle milling device such as a milling fan, a hammer mill or a pin mill to avoid over milling, or it may be dispersed through a sieving device such as a centrifugal sifter or combination of a mill and a shifter.

[0119] Thermal treatment of the dispersed material may be accomplished in a fluidized furnace or a rotary kiln or in a traveling grate or multiple hearth kiln. The energy sources for the furnaces and kilns may include electricity, natural gas, petroleum or coal. Either conventional electric or dielectric furnaces may be utilized. Oxidizing agents other than oxygen may be added during the heat treatment. A fluidized furnace may provide the necessary oxidation environment, temperature and residence time required to achieve full combustion and removal of organic matter, such as yeast cell debris and adsorbed proteins without degrading pore structure and activity of the silica gel. Fluidized furnaces that may be used for this purpose include flash calciners and perlite expanders. Examples of flash calciners include fluidized bed reactors or flash calciners or roasters marketed by FL Smidth, the Torbed® reactors by Torftech, or catalytic flash calciners by Calix. Examples of perlite expanders that may be used for regenerating spent stabilization and filtration media include the conventional expanders from Silbrico, Incon and others, and the newly developed ones such as the Bublon furnaces from Bublon GmbH and FLLOX expanders from Effective Energy Associates, LLC (now Reaction Jets, LLC). After thermal treatment, the material is cooled, collected and dispersed if necessary for reuse.

[0120] In some embodiments, the thermal treatment of the spent media may take place within the same manufacturing location as the filtration process by which the spent fermented beverage media was produced. In other embodiments, the thermal treatment to form regenerated media may take place within a 100 mile radius of the location of the filtration process by which the spent fermented beverage media was produced.

[0121] To further reduce the solubility of undesired substances, an acid wash or rinse process may be included before or after thermal regeneration. To reuse the regenerated stabilization and filtration media, any loss during regeneration and imbalance in the ratio between the filtration media and the stabilization media may be supplemented and rebalanced by adding an appropriate amount of new materials, which can also be used to improve the performance of the regenerated media. Filtration performance may be adjusted by the addition of a new filtration media of a different permeability to adjust the permeability of the combined media. In a liquid filtration application, the regenerated stabilization and filtration media can be used as bodyfeed or as both precoat and bodyfeed.

[0122] In addition to providing similar beer stabilization and filtration performance to that of new media, the regenerated media of the present disclosure provide for substantially reduced transportation costs, substantially reduced or eliminated purchasing costs, and higher purity (in terms of reduced soluble impurities), all relative to new media, while retaining the robust flexibility of particulate stabilization and filtration media. Such attributes offer potentially significant savings to manufacturers and brewers as well as environmental benefits due to a significant reduction in both the carbon footprint for breweries and the space requirements for the disposal of single-use media in landfills. In addition to these benefits, the process and products described can be produced in both new and regenerated form free of crystalline silica, an important benefit to worker safety in the mining, processing, transportation, beer stabilization and clarification, regeneration and ultimately (after multiple uses) disposal or alternate use of these materials. The improved extractable chemistry of the regenerated media provides for a significant reduction in the impurities introduced into liquids from powdered stabilization (or stabilization and filtration) media. While only certain embodiments have been set forth herein, alternative embodiments and various modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.