SINGLE PHASE SINGLE STAGE BI-DIRECTIONAL LEVEL 1 ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY CHARGER

Abstract

A single phase single stage level-1 electric vehicle (EV) battery charger can control the power flow in both directions. The converter efficiency is high as the devices undergo ZCS which reduces switching loss in the devices. This converter does not require any intermediate DC link capacitor stage and the power density of the converter is high.

Claims

1. A power converter having bidirectional power flow capabilities and inherent power factor correction (PFC) control, comprising: a high frequency transformer comprising a primary AC side, a secondary side, and a resonating circuit, wherein the primary AC side of the high frequency transformer comprises a current-fed full bridge matrix converter, wherein the current-fed full bridge matrix converter comprises eight silicon carbide (SiC) metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) positioned in four pairs, wherein a first pair of SiC MOSFETS consists of a first A SiC MOSFET and a first B SiC MOSFET, wherein a second pair of SiC MOSFETs consists of a second A SiC MOSFET and a second B SiC MOSFET, wherein a third pair of SiC MOSFETs consists of a third A SiC MOSFET and a third B SiC MOSFET, and wherein a fourth pair of SiC MOSFETs consists of a fourth A SiC MOSFET and a fourth B SiC MOSFET, wherein the secondary side of the high frequency transformer comprises a full bridge matrix converter, wherein the full bridge matrix converter comprises four SiC MOSFETs, wherein the four SiC MOSFETs consist of a fifth SiC MOSFET, a sixth SiC MOSFET, a seventh SiC MOSFET, and an eighth SiC MOSFET, and wherein the resonating circuit comprises a leakage inductor of the high frequency transformer and a capacitor.

2. An electric vehicle (EV) battery charger comprising the power converter of claim 1.

3. The electric vehicle (EV) battery charger of claim 2, further comprising an input source and a battery.

4. One or more photovoltaic cells comprising the power converter of claim 1.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0008] FIG. 1 shows converter topology for a preferred embodiment of a single phase, single stage level-1 bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charger.

[0009] FIG. 2 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 1 of operation during grid to vehicle (G2V) mode.

[0010] FIG. 3 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 2 of operation during G2V mode.

[0011] FIG. 4 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 3 of operation during G2V mode.

[0012] FIG. 5 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 4 of operation during G2V mode.

[0013] FIG. 6 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 9 of operation during vehicle to grid (V2G) mode.

[0014] FIG. 7 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 10 of operation during V2G mode.

[0015] FIG. 8 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 11 of operation during V2G mode.

[0016] FIG. 9 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 12 of operation during V2G mode.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0017] The present disclosure relates to a single phase, single stage level-1 electric vehicle (EV) charger. The single phase single stage level-1 EV battery charger can control the power flow in both directions. Preferred switching sequences of the devices are also described. The converter efficiency is high as the devices undergo ZCS which reduces switching loss in the devices. This converter does not require any intermediate DC link capacitor stage. As an advantage, the power density of the converter is high.

[0018] FIG. 1 shows converter topology for a preferred embodiment of a single phase, single stage level-1 bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charger having inherent PFC control. The primary AC side includes 8 silicon carbide (SiC) metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) labeled M.sub.1a to M.sub.4b and the secondary side includes 4 SiC MOSFETs labeled M.sub.5 to M.sub.8. The converter develops a high frequency AC in the primary side of the isolating transformer, operating as a cycloconverter. It is then rectified in the secondary side to generate DC voltage. Similar operation is conducted in reverse direction for reverse power flow. Zero current switching (ZCS) is achieved with the help of a resonating circuit that includes leakage inductance (L.sub.k) of the transformer and an external capacitor (C.sub.k).

[0019] The converter topology shown in FIG. 1 is a preferred embodiment that can be extended to various applications. The proposed topology can be extended for grid integration of photovoltaic cells. It can operate independently in both grid connected mode and islanded mode. The proposed EV charger topology can also be extended for bidirectional power flow with a three phase operation.

[0020] FIG. 2 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter during mode of operation that is grid to vehicle (G2V) mode. In this mode, which may be referred to as Mode 1, power is transferred from the input source (Vin) to the battery (Vbat). For G2V operation, active switching is conducted in the primary side and the secondary side devices are operated as a diode bridge rectifier. For positive input voltage (Vin>0), the operation can be divided from Mode 1 to Mode 4. Similarly, the operation can be divided from Mode 5 to Mode 8 for Vin<0. In this mode M.sub.1a, M.sub.2a are kept on and M.sub.1b and M.sub.2b are kept off. As a result, the input current flows from the source (V.sub.in) to leakage inductor (L.sub.k) and capacitor (C.sub.k) through M.sub.1a, M.sub.2a and diodes of M.sub.1b and M.sub.2b. In the secondary side, diodes of M.sub.5 and M.sub.6 conduct to charge the battery (V.sub.bat).

[0021] FIG. 3 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 2 of G2V mode. In Mode 2, Device M.sub.4a is turned on and then M.sub.2a is turned off. As a result, ZCS occurs for M.sub.2a. In this case, the input current (I.sub.in) freewheels through M.sub.1a, M.sub.4a and diodes of M.sub.1b and M.sub.4b. The capacitor C.sub.k and inductor L.sub.k starts resonating. This resonance causes the leakage current through L.sub.k to reach input current level. As a result, a voltage spike does not appear across the primary device. In other words, the C.sub.k acts as a snubber capacitor. It helps in arresting the voltage overshoot caused due to the current mismatch between the leakage inductor and line inductor. At the end of Mode 2, M.sub.3a is turned on. It exhibits ZCS turn-on.

[0022] FIG. 4 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 3 during G2V mode. In Mode 3, M.sub.1a is turned off. The input current flows through M.sub.3a, M.sub.4a and diodes of M.sub.3b and M.sub.4b. The current direction reverses in the leakage inductor L.sub.k and C.sub.k. In the secondary side, diodes of M.sub.7 and M.sub.8 conduct to charge the battery (V.sub.bat).

[0023] FIG. 5 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 4 during G2V mode. In this mode, M.sub.2a is turned on and then M.sub.4a is turned off. As a result M.sub.4a experiences ZCS turn-off. In this case, the input current (I.sub.in) freewheels through M.sub.3a and M.sub.2a. The capacitor C.sub.k and inductor L.sub.k starts resonating. This resonance causes the leakage current through L.sub.k to reach input current level similar to Mode 2. As a result, a voltage spike does not appear across the primary device. This helps in arresting the voltage overshoot caused due to the current mismatch between the leakage inductor and line inductor. At the end of Mode 3, M.sub.1a is turned on. It exhibits ZCS turn-on.

[0024] During V.sub.in>0, Mia, M.sub.2a, M.sub.3a and M.sub.4a exhibit ZCS. In a similar fashion, Mode 5 to Mode 8 can also be explained. Here M.sub.1b, M.sub.2b, M.sub.3b and M.sub.4b exhibit ZCS. It is important to notice that C.sub.k continues to conduct current even if V.sub.bat>V.sub.in. As a result, there is a path for the input current to flow at every switching condition. This phenomena ensures PFC for all loading conditions.

[0025] In vehicle to grid (V2G) mode, power is transferred from the battery (V.sub.bat) to the grid (V.sub.in). For V2G operation, battery side devices are switched in square wave mode and three level sine triangle pulse-width modulation (PWM) switching is conducted for the grid side devices. For positive input voltage (V.sub.in>0), the operation can be divided from Mode 9 to Mode 12. Similarly, the operation can be divided from Mode 13 to Mode 16 for V.sub.in<0. For V2G operation, the resonating capacitor C.sub.k is removed from the circuit through a contactor.

[0026] FIG. 6 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 9 during V2G mode. In this mode, M.sub.5 and M.sub.6 in the secondary side are kept on. The grid current flows through M.sub.1b, M.sub.2b and diodes of M.sub.1a and M.sub.2a.

[0027] FIG. 7 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 10 during V2G mode. In Mode 10, M.sub.4b is turned on. As a result, the grid current freewheels through M.sub.4b, M.sub.1b and diodes of M.sub.1a and M.sub.4a. M.sub.2b is turned off once the grid current is completely transferred to the freewheeling branch exhibiting ZCS turn-off. At the end of this mode M.sub.3b is turned on. M.sub.3b experiences ZCS turn on as there is no current through it.

[0028] FIG. 8 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 11 during V2G mode. In Mode 11, M.sub.1b is turned off. As a consequence, grid current flows through M.sub.4b, M.sub.3b and diodes of M.sub.4a and M.sub.4a respectively. This switching cycle reverses the direction of current flowing through the leakage inductor (L.sub.k).

[0029] FIG. 9 shows a preferred embodiment of a converter in Mode 12 during V2G mode. At the end of mode 11, M.sub.2b is turned on again. The grid current again freewheels through M.sub.2b, M.sub.3b and diodes of M.sub.2a and M.sub.3a. After the transfer of grid current to the freewheeling branch, M.sub.4b is turned off. It exhibits ZCS turn-off.

[0030] Mode 9 to Mode 12 are continued until M.sub.5 and M.sub.6 are in the on-state in the secondary side. Once M.sub.7 and M.sub.8 are turned on, the switching cycles described above are reversed. In a similar fashion, the switching of the devices are carried out for V.sub.in<0. As described above, all devices on the primary side undergo ZCS.

REFERENCES

[0031] The following documents and publications are hereby incorporated by reference.

[0032] F. Jauch and J. Biela, “Single-phase single-stage bidirectional isolated ZVS ac-dc converter with PFC,” in Proc. 15th Int. Power Electron. Motion Control Conf., 2012, pp. S1d-S5d.

[0033] H. S. Athab, D. D. C. Lu, A. Yazdani, and W. Bin, “An efficient singleswitch quasi-active PFC converter with continuous input current and low dc-bus voltage stress,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1735-1749, April 2014.

[0034] C. Li, Y. Zhang, and D. Xu, “Soft-switching single stage isolated ac-dc converter for single-phase high power PFC applications,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Power Electron. ECCE Asia, 2015, pp. 1103-1108.

[0035] R. Watson and F. C. Lee, “A soft-switched, full-bridge boost converter employing an active-clamp circuit,” in Proc. 27th Annu. IEEE Power Electron. Spec. Conf., 1996, pp. 1948-1954.

[0036] C. Qiao and K. M. Smedley, “A topology survey of single-stage power factor corrector with a boost type input-current-shaper,” in Proc. 15.sup.th Annu. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., 2000, pp. 460-467.

[0037] M. Pahlevaninezhad, P. Das, P. Jain, A. Bakhshai, and G. Moschopoulos, “A self sustained oscillation controlled three level ac-dc single stage converter,” in Proc. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., 2012, pp. 1172-1178.

[0038] M. Z. Youssef and P. K. Jain, “Analysis and design of a compact single stage ac-dc resonant converter with high power factor,” in Proc. Can. Conf. Elect. Comput. Eng., 2007, pp. 702-705.

[0039] S. Dusmez, X. Li, and B. Akin, “A fully integrated three-level isolated single-stage PFC converter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2050-2062, April 2015.

[0040] S. Guo, X. Ni, K. Tan, and A. Q. Huang, “Operation principles of bidirectional isolated ac/dc converter with natural clamping soft switching scheme,” in Proc. 40th Annu. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc., 2014, pp. 4866-4872.

[0041] H. S. Ribeiro and B. Vieira Borges, “Solving technical problems on the full-bridge single-stage PFCs,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2264-2277, May 2014.

[0042] H. Pinheiro, P. Jain, and G. E. Z. Joos, “Self-oscillating resonant ac/dc converter topology for input power-factor correction,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 692-702, August 1999.

[0043] P. K. Jain, J. E. R. Espinoza, and N. Ismail, “A single-stage zero-voltage zero-current-switched full-bridge dc power supply with extended load power range,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 261-270, Apr. 1999.

[0044] J. Chen, R. Chen, and T. Liang, “Study and implementation of a single-stage current-fed boost PFC converter with ZCS for high voltage applications,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 379-386, January 2008.

[0045] B. Singh, B. N. Singh, A. Chandra, K. Al-Haddad, A. Pandey, and D. P. Kothari, “A review of single-phase improved power quality ac-dc converters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 962-981, October 2003.

[0046] D. Gautam, F. Musavi, M. Edington, W. Eberle, and W. G. Dunford, “An automotive on-board 3.3 kW battery charger for PHEV application,” in Proc. 2011 IEEE Veh. Power Propulsion Conf., 2011, pp. 1-6.

[0047] N. Weise and L. Doiron, “DQ current control of a bidirectional, isolated single-stage ac-dc converter,” in Proc. 29th Annu. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., 2014, pp. 1888-1893.

[0048] G. Xu, D. Sha, and X. Liao, “Input-series and output-parallel connected single stage buck type modular ac-dc converters with high-frequency isolation,” IET Power Electron., vol. 8, pp. 1295-1304, 2015.

[0049] W. Zhu, K. Zhou, M. Cheng, and F. Peng, “A high-frequency-link single phase PWM rectifier,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 289-298, January 2015.

[0050] M. S. Agamy and P. K. Jain, “A three-level resonant single-stage power factor correction converter: Analysis, design, and implementation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 2095-2107, June 2009.

[0051] J. Everts, F. Krismer, J. Van den Keybus, J. Driesen, and J. W. Kolar, “Optimal ZVS modulation of single-phase single-stage bidirectional DAB ac-dc converters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 3954-3970, August 2014.