Thermoplastic elastomer compositions having micronized rubber powder

Abstract

Thermoplastic elastomers comprising micronized or pulverized rubber powders are disclosed having physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers. For example, the use of finer mesh MRP (e.g., particles of size that would pass through 40 mesh or smaller) to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers. Similarly, the use of a glycidyl functional terpolymer (optionally in combination with trimellitic anhydride or “TMA”) to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers comprising MRP results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers. Moreover, the use of styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene thermoplastic (e.g., “SEBS”) in place of the base polypropylene thermoplastic elastomer to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers comprising MRP also results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers.

Claims

1. A thermoplastic elastomer, comprising a base elastomer, recycled vulcanizate, and a reactive terpolymer, wherein the reactive terpolymer is glycidyl functional terpolymer.

2. The composition of claim 1, further comprising a co-reactant.

3. The composition of claim 2, wherein the co-reactant is selected from the group consisting of an anhydride, a polyphosphoric acid, and combinations thereof.

4. The composition of claim 1, further comprising a process aid.

5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the base elastomer is selected from the group consisting of a polyolefin elastomer, a styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene thermoplastic elastomer, and combinations thereof.

6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the recycled vulcanizate is derived from tire rubber compounds.

7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the recycled vulcanizate is derived from ethylene propylene diene monomer compounds.

8. The composition of claim 1, wherein the recycled vulcanizate is 60 mesh or finer.

9. The composition of claim 3, wherein the anhydride is a trimellitic anhydride.

10. The composition of claim 5, wherein the polyolefin elastomer is selected from the group consisting of a polypropylene elastomer, a polyethylene elastomer, and combinations thereof.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS

(1) Briefly described, and according to particular embodiments, aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to thermoplastic elastomers comprising micronized or pulverized rubber powders that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers.

(2) Generally, ground tire rubber, or GTR, comprises reclaimed elastomer materials of particle size distributions that range from a diameter of 2 mm to 0.5 mm and are produced in a variety of ways including grinding methods such as cryogenic grinding. Micronized rubber powder, or MRP, is termed as such because it generally comprises reclaimed elastomer materials with a significant fraction of particles less than 100 microns in size. MRP may also be produced by either ambient or cryogenic grinding methods. Powders such as GTR and MRP are commonly designated by their mesh size. For example, powders in the size range of 10-30 mesh generally are considered GTR, whereas 40-300 mesh materials generally are considered MRP. GTR typically is less expensive than MRP because of the higher manufacturing cost required for making the smaller particles. Because of this cost difference, GTR generally is used instead of MRP, unless the specific application requires properties than can only be achieved through the use of MRP.

(3) Reclaimed elastomer materials used to manufacture GTR and MRP generally are obtained from previously-manufactured products (e.g., used and unused vehicle tires) and from vulcanized scrap generated during the manufacturing process (e.g., vulcanized scrap generated from the tire manufacturing process), and, thus, the GTR and MRP are generally vulcanized and lacking any functionalization or surface-activation. GTR and MRP are relatively inert (e.g., the particles are non-reactive with virgin matrix materials). As such, GTR and MRP have been limited in their use as a component in thermoplastic elastomer compositions because when added at high levels, the resultant thermoplastic elastomers exhibit diminished performance characteristics.

(4) As described further in this disclosure, the use of finer mesh MRP (e.g., particles of size that would pass through 40 mesh or smaller) to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers. Similarly, the use of a glycidyl functional terpolymer (optionally, in combination with trimellitic anhydride “TMA,” polyphosphoric acid “PPA,” or other anhydrides) to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers comprising MRP results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers. Moreover, the use of styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene thermoplastic elastomer (e.g., “SEBS”) in place of the base polypropylene thermoplastic elastomer to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers comprising MRP also results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers.

(5) Generally, in one embodiment, the properties of the thermoplastic elastomers disclosed herein are believed to be due to favorable reactions between the glycidyl group of the terpolymer and the rubber (e.g., MRP). The anhydride and/or PPA generally is a co-reactant that accelerates the reaction. Similar behaviors have been observed in asphalt systems in which the glycidyl group interacts with the asphaltenes. In one embodiment, the carbon black in the rubber and asphaltenes do have some similarities in structure (e.g., some potentially reactive polar groups on the carbon rings), which is why it is believed that the properties of the thermoplastic elastomers disclosed herein are due to favorable reactions between the glycidyl group of the terpolymer and the rubber.

(6) The disclosed thermoplastic elastomers comprise MRP in place of some of the base elastomer and/or polymer and are suitable for manufacturing via both extrusion and injection molding. As used herein, the term “MicroDyne” or “MD” refers to a brand name of vulcanized elastomer particles (e.g., cured rubber particles, recycled rubber particles, ground tire rubber, GTR, micronized rubber powder, or MRP) produced by Lehigh Technologies, Inc., of Tucker, Ga. According to particular embodiments, the particles described herein are produced via a cryogenic grinding system described by U.S. Pat. No. 7,445,170, entitled “Process and Apparatus for Manufacturing Crumb and Powder Rubber,” and an impact mill as described by U.S. Pat. No. 7,861,958, entitled “Conical-Shaped Impact Mill.” In other embodiments of the present disclosure, these micronized rubber powders are produced via a variety of other known processes and techniques as will occur to one of ordinary skill in the art, and the powders used herein are not limited to the specific cryogenic grinding processes described herein.

(7) As also used herein and recited in the attached exhibits, “MD-400” generally refers to a reclaimed elastomer material composition (i.e., micronized rubber powder) conforming to conventional mesh standards (e.g., the American Standard Sieve Series, ASTM E11:95) with particles of a size that would pass through sieves with larger openings but would be retained by a 40-mesh sieve (e.g., with openings of size 0.425 mm), “MD-180” generally refers to MRP conforming to conventional mesh standards with particles of a size that would pass through sieves with larger openings but would be retained by a 80-mesh sieve (e.g., with openings of size 0.180 mm), “MD-105” generally refers to MRP conforming to conventional mesh standards with particles of a size that would pass through sieves with larger openings but would be retained by a 140-mesh sieve (e.g., with openings of size 0.106 mm), and so on. Further, “TR” generally refers to MRP manufactured from tire rubber and “EP” generally refers to MRP manufactured from ethylene propylene diene monomer (e.g., “EPDM”) rubber. Thus, MD-400-TR, MD-180-EP, MD-105-TR, MD-105-EP, etc. are proprietary brand names used to describe specific reclaimed elastomer material compositions (whether GTR or MRP) produced by Lehigh Technologies, Inc., which comprise particles of the identified predetermined particle size distributions and rubber compositions. As will be understood and appreciated, the specific formulations associated with MD-400, MD-180, MD-105, or any other formulation are presented purely for illustrative purposes and elastomeric compositions, reclaimed elastomer material compositions, or other elastomer formulations contemplated by the present disclosure are not limited to the specific characteristics or features recited herein.

(8) Aspects of the present disclosure include several novel material combinations for thermoplastic elastomers that allow for use of MRP and other materials that enable the resulting elastomers to behave like virgin thermoplastic elastomers. First, the use of finer mesh MRP (e.g., particles of size that would pass through 40 mesh or smaller) to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers.

(9) Second, the use of a glycidyl functional terpolymer (e.g., ELVALOY® 5170, etc.), optionally in combination with TMA, PPA, or other anhydrides to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers comprising MRP results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers.

(10) Third, the use of styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene thermoplastic elastomer (e.g., “SEBS”, KRATON™ MD1653, etc.) in place of the base polypropylene thermoplastic elastomer to manufacture thermoplastic elastomers comprising MRP also results in thermoplastic elastomers that have physical properties equivalent to those of virgin thermoplastic elastomers.

(11) Exemplary Thermoplastic Elastomer Formulations.

(12) Exemplary thermoplastic elastomers according to the present disclosure were manufactured for testing with the following formulations and procedures:

(13) Generally, as shown in Tables 1 & 2 and as used in the exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations, VISTAMAXX™ 6502 refers to the brand name of a base elastomer manufactured by Exxon-Mobil; KRATON™ MD 1653 refers to the brand name of a base elastomer manufactured by Kraton; ELVALOY® 5170 refers to the brand name of a reactive terpolymer; manufactured by DuPont; and STRUKTOL® TR016 refers to the brand name of a compatibilizer manufactured by Struktol. This disclosure places no limitations on the types, brands, or formulations of base elastomers, reactive terpolymers, and compatibilizer used in the exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations as those base elastomers, reactive terpolymers, and compatibilizer used in the exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations are for exemplary purposes only.

(14) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Exemplary Thermoplastic Elastomer Formulations, grams Material Exemplary Purpose TPE 1 TPE 2 TPE 3 TPE 4 TPE 5 TPE 6 TPE 7 Vistamaxx ™ 6502 Base Elastomer 245 215 175 97 97 175 Kraton ™ MD 1653 Base Elastomer 97 Polypropylene Polymer 128 128 128 Elvaloy ® 5170 Reactive Terpolymer 30 15 15 15 15 15 TMA Co-Reactant 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Stuktol ® TR016 Compatibilizer 5 5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 MD-400-TR MRP Filler 750 750 300 250 7 MD-105-TR MRP Filler 250 250 300 Totals 1000 1000 500 500 500 500 500

(15) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Alternative Exemplary Thermoplastic Elastomer Formulations, grams Exemplary Material Purpose TPE 8 TPE 9 TPE 10 TPE 11 Vistamaxx ™ 6502 Base 110 110 175 148 Elastomer Polypropylene Polymer 115 115 77 Elvaloy ® 5170 Reactive 15 15 15 15 Terpolymer Struktol ® TR016 Process Aid 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 TMA Co-Reactant 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 MD-180-EP MRP Filler 250 300 250 MD-105-EP MRP Filler 250 Totals 500 500 500 500

(16) Referring to Tables 1 & 2, it may be seen that exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulation TPE1 comprises no reactive terpolymer or TMA, while all other exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations comprise reactive terpolymer and/or TMA.

(17) The samples of the exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations were formed from compounded pellets that were prepared with a conventional thermoplastic processing technique of, in various embodiments: blending of the components listed in Table 1 (e.g., typically either in either pellet or powder form), feeding the blend into a conventional heated twin screw extruder with a temperature of approximately 160° C.-180° C. to form a blended thermoplastic melt, extruding the melt in strand form into a cooling water bath, and chopping the cooled, extruded strands into compounded pellets. As will occur to one having ordinary skill in the art, this disclosure places no limitation on the thermoplastic processing technique. For example, other conventional thermoplastic extrusion techniques may be used to form the compounded pellets.

(18) A conventional thermoplastic injection molding process, in various embodiments, was used to form the samples of the exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations from the compounded pellets as follows: feeding the compounded pellets into a conventional thermoplastic injection molding machine, heating the pellets to approximately 160° C.-180° C. to form a melt, injection molding the melt to form a molded sheet, and die cutting test specimens using a conventional die cutting apparatus.

(19) Exemplary Thermoplastic Elastomer Testing Procedures.

(20) The physical properties of the previously-described exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations were tested using the test method ASTM D412-16, Die C. Generally, five samples of each exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulation were tested.

(21) Exemplary Thermoplastic Elastomer Test Results.

(22) The exemplary results of the previously-described tests are as follows:

(23) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Exemplary Thermoplastic Elastomer Formulations (median values) TPE 1 TPE 2 TPE 3 TPE 4 TPE 5 TPE 6 TPE 7 TPE 8 TPE 9 TPE 10 TPE 11 Tensile Strength, MPa 4 4 5 12.4 9 11.5 5.7 9.4 8.7 5 7 Elongation at Break, % 364 400 394 337 325 345 495 400 356 415 342 Break Energy, MPa 6.6 8.8 9.9 20.9 11.0 19.8 14.1 18.8 15.5 10.4 12.0

(24) Generally, as shown in Table 3, the median value for each tested property is shown from the tests of the five samples of each of the exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations. In one embodiment, as shown in Table 3, the Tensile Strength refers to the maximum engineering tensile stress that a particular sample could withstand before breaking, wherein breaking is defined as sample rupture. Similarly, as shown in Table 3, in one embodiment, Elongation at Break is a measurement of the percent elongation of a thermoplastic elastomer sample (in comparison to its un-elongated stated) at the point that the thermoplastic elastomer sample breaks, wherein breaking is defined as sample rupture. Further, as shown in Table 3, Break Energy refers to the area under the stress-strain curve, which, in one embodiment, is approximated as:

(25) $\frac{\mathrm{Median}\mathrm{Tensile}\mathrm{Strength}\times \mathrm{Median}\mathrm{Elongation}\mathrm{at}\mathrm{Break}}{2}$

(26) Median Break Energy is generally used to compare results, considering that materials with a relative higher Median Break Energy represent an improvement.

(27) Referring to Table 3, in one embodiment, exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulation TPE1 has a median break energy of 6.6 MPa, and all other exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations have significantly higher break energies.

(28) Comparative Thermoplastic Elastomer Test Results.

(29) As shown in Table 4, the exemplary comparative/control thermoplastic elastomers tested were manufactured by GDC, Inc., of Goshen, Ind. (e.g., ENDURAPRENE 3370, 3380, and 3390), or Jabat, Inc., of Olney, Ill. (e.g., JABAT MR-POE (J2) and JABAT MR-POE-MP (J4)). Generally, as shown in Table 4, the exemplary comparative thermoplastic elastomer test results were gathered using the test method ASTM D412-16, Die C and the median value for each tested property is shown from the tests of the five samples of each of the exemplary comparative/control thermoplastic elastomers.

(30) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Exemplary Comparative Thermoplastic Elastomer Test Results Endura- Endura- Endura- Jabat Jarat prene prene prene MR-POE MR-POE-MP 3370 3380 3390 (J2) (J4) Tensile 2.1 2.4 4.3 3.4 4.7 Strength, MPa Elongation at 428 443 120 257 295 Break, % Break Energy, 4.494 5.316 2.58 4.369 6.9325 MPa

(31) In various embodiments, the comparative/control thermoplastic elastomers for which test results are shown in Table 4 generally represent thermoplastic elastomers formulations without finer mesh MRP, glycidyl functional terpolymer, TMA, PPA, other anhydrides, and/or SEBS. As shown in Table 4, in various embodiments, the median break energies of the comparative/control thermoplastic elastomers are almost all lower (e.g., less desirable) than the median break energies of the exemplary thermoplastic elastomer formulations.

(32) The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” as used in the claims and specification herein, shall be considered as indicating an open group that may include other elements not specified. The term “consisting essentially of,” as used in the claims and specification herein, shall be considered as indicating a partially open group that may include other elements not specified, so long as those other elements do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed invention. The terms “a,” “an,” and the singular forms of words shall be taken to include the plural form of the same words, such that the terms mean that one or more of something is provided. The terms “at least one” and “one or more” are used interchangeably. The term “one” or “single” shall be used to indicate that one and only one of something is intended. Similarly, other specific integer values, such as “two,” are used when a specific number of things is intended. The terms “preferably,” “preferred,” “prefer,” “optionally,” “may,” and similar terms are used to indicate that an item, condition or step being referred to is an optional (not required) feature of the invention. Ranges that are described as being “between a and b” are inclusive of the values for “a” and “b.”

(33) It should be understood from the foregoing description that various modifications and changes may be made to the embodiments of the present invention without departing from its true spirit. The foregoing description is provided for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed in a limiting sense. Only the language of the following claims should limit the scope of this invention.