SCREW BONE IMPLANT
20220104856 · 2022-04-07
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61F2/4465
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B17/70
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B17/7064
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B17/8645
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B17/863
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A screw implant is provided for the distraction, fusion, or compression of two adjacent bone structures or two adjacent bone fragments. The implant is a fully threaded screw with a headless proximal end having a drive engagement feature and a blunt distal end for insertion into bone or related tissue. The implant has roughened and porous surfaces throughout and is fully coated with hydroxyapatite and/or tri-calcium phosphate to allow for bone in-growth. The implant may have uniform low pitch cortical threads, or variable pitch threads, with low pitch cortical threads on one end and larger pitch cancellous threads on the other end. The implant may be used for the distraction of spinal vertebrae. The implants may have a cannulation channel and fenestrations.
Claims
1. An implant for fusion of two adjacent bone structures or two adjacent bone fragments, comprising a fully threaded screw with a proximal end having a drive engagement feature and a distal end for insertion into bone or related tissue, wherein a. the screw has roughened surfaces throughout, is fully coated with hydroxyapatite and/or tri-calcium phosphate, and is porous to allow for bone in-growth; b. the proximal end of the screw is headless and the distal end to the head is flattened, rounded, or blunted; c. the screw has uniform low pitch cortical threads, with a major diameter of 3 mm to 7 mm, and a length of 5 mm to 65 mm; and d. the screw is made from titanium alloy or tantalum alloy with a similar modulus of elasticity to bone.
2. An implant for fusion of two adjacent bone structures or two adjacent bone fragments, comprising a fully threaded screw with a proximal end having a drive engagement feature and a distal end for insertion into bone or related tissue; wherein a. the screw has roughened surfaces throughout, is fully coated with hydroxyapatite and/or tri-calcium phosphate, and is porous to allow for bone in-growth; b. the proximal end of the screw is headless and the distal end to the head is flattened, rounded, or blunted; c. the screw has variable pitch threads, having low pitch cortical threads distal to the head, and larger pitch cancellous threads proximal to the head, wherein; the screw has a uniform major diameter of 3 mm to 7 mm for the entire length, and a length of 5 mm to 65 mm; d. wherein the screw is made from titanium alloy or tantalum alloy with a similar modulus of elasticity to bone.
3. An implant for fusion of two adjacent bone structures or two adjacent bone fragments, comprising a fully threaded screw with a proximal end having a drive engagement feature and a distal end for insertion into bone or related tissue; wherein a. the screw has roughened surfaces throughout, is fully coated with hydroxyapatite and/or tri-calcium phosphate, and is porous to allow for bone in-growth; b. the proximal end of the screw is headless and the distal end to the head is flattened, rounded, or blunted; c. the screw has variable pitch threads, having large pitch cancellous threads distal to the head, and low pitch cortical threads proximal to the head, wherein; the screw has a uniform major diameter of 3 mm to 7 mm for the entire length, and a length of 5 mm to 65 mm; d. wherein the screw is made from titanium alloy or tantalum alloy with a similar modulus of elasticity to bone.
4. The screw of claims 1-3, wherein the screw diameter (major diameter) is 4 mm to 5 mm.
5. The screw of claims 1-3, wherein the screw length is selected from 10 mm, 12 mm, and 15 mm.
6. The screw of claims 1-3, wherein the implant is solid without cannulation.
7. The screw of claims 1-3, wherein the implant is cannulating to allow placement with a guidewire.
8. The screw of claims 1-3, wherein the screw comprises one or more fenestrations with or without cannulation.
9. A method of fusing spinal vertebrae, comprising the implant of claim 1 inserted in-line with a joint between two vertebrae.
10. A method of fusing cervical spinal vertebrae, comprising the implant of claim 1 inserted in-line with a facet joint between two vertebrae
11. A method of fusing cervical spinal vertebrae, comprising the implant of claim 1 inserted in-line with a facet joint in the C3-C7 vertebrae.
12. A method of fusing spinal vertebrae comprising the implant of claim 2 or claim 3 inserted across a joint between two vertebrae.
13. A method of fusing cervical spinal vertebrae comprising the implant of claim 2 or claim 3 inserted across a facet joint between two vertebrae.
14. A method of fusing cervical spinal vertebrae comprising the implant of claim 2 or claim 3 inserted across a facet joint in the C3-C7 vertebrae.
15. A method of fusing two bones or two bone fragments comprising the implant of claim 2 or claim 3 inserted across a joint between the two bones or bone fragments.
16. A method of fusing two disjointed bones or bone fragments comprising inserting the implant of claim 2 or 3 across a joint between the bone fragments wherein the implant stabilizes or compresses the joint.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0031] This invention provides an implant for fusion of cervical spinal vertebrae, wherein the implant is a fully threaded screw with a cylindrical body as shown in
[0032] The inventive implants may be used for distraction, fusion, and bone compression of adjacent bones or bone fragments, including vertebrae. In an embodiment, the screws are inserted into the posterior facet joint between two vertebrae. Alternatively, the screws can be inserted across a facet joint using a drilled hole and optionally a guide wire. In contrast to the prior art devices discussed above, such as the CAVUX®, HONOUR® ORB, Valeo® II C, UNIFLEX® Cervical cage, which require malleting or tamping during insertion, the inventive implants 100 are inserted by being screwed into position. All of the above referenced prior art devices are cages and have a boxy or wedge shape to some extent. All of the cage-like devices must be malleted into position. The inventive devices which are screwed into position for vertebral distraction afford a much greater degree of control for the surgeon. Malleting also has the disadvantage that fracturing or chipping of bone at the facet joint is a common adverse event. If this occurs, invasive remediation is required such as open or traditional fusion with screws and rods.
[0033] In another embodiment, the implants such as those illustrated in
[0034] The inventive device has significant advantages over the screws disclosed in US 2009/0312763 A1 (763) at FIGS. 39-47. The '763 devices do not have the osteoconductive hydroxyapatite or TCP coatings of the inventive implants and do not have porous surfaces and roughened surfaces.
[0035] The inventive devices have features to facilitate osseoincorporation or osseointegration of the implant into bone tissue. In an embodiment, the inventive implants are equipped with a roughened surface with a HA and/or TCP to facilitate bone ongrowth on the implant. (Jung Taek Kim, MD and Jeong Joon Yoo, “Implant Design in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty,” Hip Pelvis. 2016 June; 28(2): 65-75, doi: 10.5371/hp.2016.28.2.65 (see p. 65)) The porous surfaces facilitate bone ingrowth. Bone ingrowth refers to the formation of bone within an irregular surface of an implant, which improves the implant's integration into bone. The presence of a porous-coated implant evokes a cellular and physiological response that resembles the healing cascade of cancellous defects. In porous implants, the void spaces are filled with newly formed bone tissue when the implants are stable. Fenestrations promote bone through-growth, meaning bone growth through the fenestrations.
[0036] The insertion of the implants 100 may take two or more configurations. One embodiment is shown in
[0037] With either installation configuration, the width of the dissection can be narrower than is required with the DePuy/Synthes SYNAPSE™ and the Stryker OASYS® system.
[0038]
[0039] In the embodiment shown in
[0040] The “major diameter” (D.sub.maj) is defined as the maximum outside diameter of the threads. The D.sub.maj, is the larger of two extreme diameters delimiting the height of the thread profile, as a cross-sectional view is taken in a plane containing the axis of the threads. The “minor diameter” (D.sub.min) is the diameter of the core of the implant, i.e., at the bottom of the threads. The D.sub.min is the lower extreme diameter of the thread. As used herein, the “core diameter” or “shaft diameter” is equivalent to the minor diameter. In an embodiment, the implant has a uniform major diameter for the entire length, except for the rounded, flattened, or blunted distal tip. “Thread height” is defined at D.sub.maj-D.sub.min. In an embodiment, the D.sub.min may vary, particularly in embodiments with variable thread pitches, in order to keep the D.sub.maj uniform. In such embodiments, the D.sub.min will be smaller in sections of the screw with larger cancellous threads than in sections of the screw with smaller cortical threads.
[0041] In an embodiment, the threads may have low crests, meaning shallow threads, that is, meaning the difference between the major and minor diameter will be smaller than a normal 1.25 mm to 1.75 mm pitch thread. This is similar to commonly used orthopedic set screws or cortex screws.
[0042] In an embodiment, the distal end 104 of implant 100 is flattened, rounded, or blunted. This is desirable to minimize damage during insertion and reduce the tolerance necessary to insert the implant without unnecessary damage at the implant site.
[0043] In an embodiment the proximal end 102 of the implant is headless and includes a drive engagement feature 120, such as a hexagonal head, star head, or Phillips head, for the insertion of a screwdriver to rotationally drive the implant into position. However, other shaped features are also contemplated (both male and female). For example, the drive engagement feature 120 can include a cruciate shape, square shape, six-point star shape, or the like. Where a hexagonal (or “hex”) feature is used (e.g., 120 in
[0044] In an embodiment, the implant 100 has no external head (headless), meaning the drive engagement feature 120 is recessed into the body of the implant and there is no portion of the device outside the shape of the cylinder or cone 106 (i.e., the minor diameter) needed to accommodate the drive engagement feature. This is important because in an embodiment, the inventive implant 100 may be driven entirely into the bone, with no portion of the screw exterior to the natural surface of the bone (
[0045]
[0046] In the embodiment shown in
[0047] In an embodiment, the implant of
[0048] In an embodiment as shown in
[0049] In an embodiment, the device of
[0050] In an embodiment, the device of
[0051] The inventive implant may be equipped with features to enhance bone in-growth. In an embodiment, the implant may be fabricated from a porous material known to enhance bone in-growth. In an embodiment, the implant may have a uniformly roughened surface to enhance bone on-growth and provide a scratch fit or interference fit. The implant may also be coated with an osteoconductive coating and equipped with fenestrations.
[0052] In an embodiment, the device of
[0053] In an embodiment, the entire implant may be fabricated from a medically compatible tantalum, titanium, tantalum alloy, or titanium alloy. For example, an appropriate titanium alloy may be titanium 6AL4V and 6AL4V ELI (ASTM Standard F1472, https://www.astm.org/Standards/F1472.htm (see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ti-6Al-4V)), which are alloys made with about 6% aluminum and 4% vanadium. An appropriate tantalum alloy may be tantalum alloyed with 2.5% to 10% tungsten, or 40% niobium. These materials are known to have good biocompatibility and match the modulus of elasticity of bone. In an embodiment, the implant may be manufactured from a titanium alloy in accordance with ASTM F136, or where exterior surfaces are coated with medical-grade commercially pure titanium (CP Ti) per ASTM F1580.
[0054] In an embodiment, titanium or tantalum alloys can be made with roughened and porous surfaces. See e.g., https://www.slideshare.net/sameerashar9/uncemented-femoral-stem and Vasconcellos L M et al. “Evaluation of bone ingrowth into porous titanium implant: histomorphometric analysis in rabbits,” Braz Oral Res. 2010 October-December; 24(4):399-405, DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000400005.
[0055] In an embodiment, all surfaces of the implant may be roughened with a macro surface roughness. This may be accomplished with a technique such as grit blasting, acid etching, or plasma spray coating (also called thermal spray coating). The rough surfaces are indicated in the drawings by the random dot pattern shown throughout.
[0056] In an embodiment, all surfaces of the implant 100 are coated with hydroxyapatite (HA) and/or tricalcium phosphate (TCP). HA and TCP are well known as osteoconductive materials that encourage bone growth.
[0057] In an embodiment, the implant may be fabricated from a porous material known to enhance bone in-growth, for example with pore sizes ranging in 100 to 900 μm to facilitate in-growth and have a porosity of 60-65% to mimic cancellous bone. Porosity may be created by mechanical manipulation of the screws, such with micro-drilling or laser drilling in an uneven pattern. The porosity is shown in the figures by the larger surface imperfections depicted as triangles.
[0058] The combination of surface roughness, HA or TCP coating, and porosity will facilitate bone in-growth which is desirable for fusion.