Control structure
11299901 · 2022-04-12
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F16F1/027
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
E04H9/021
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
F16F13/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
E04B1/98
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
F16F2224/0208
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16M2200/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16M13/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
A47B96/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
F16F1/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
E04B1/98
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
F16F13/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16M13/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
A47B96/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
A control structure device for racks or buildings. The device is able to limit forces developed within itself or a structure (e.g. building or storage rack) it connects with and is seismically supportive of as it endures ground or base motion input from a seismic event. The control structure may comprise a relatively inflexible rocker frame which is pivotably connected to a foundation. Rotation of the rocker frame causes a flexural member to flexurally displace to limit force and energy in the system.
Claims
1. A force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure comprising: a pivotable rocker frame having a pivot connection to a structural member; a yield connector comprising a resistively and resiliently deformable, elastoplastically yielding yield element, the yield connector being directly or indirectly connected between the rocker frame and the structural member wherein the yield connector comprises a first anchor for direct or indirect connection to a first end region of the yield element, and a second anchor for direct or indirect connection to a second end region of the yield element, and wherein the second anchor and second end region are configured with at least one of a free translational boundary condition or a free translational and rotational boundary condition wherein the second end region is able to translate or translate and rotate relative to a reaction surface or reaction point at the second anchor, whereby the yield connector is able to elastoplastically displace while maintaining a constant resistive yield force, and control and limit a dynamic response of the control structure and a mass seismically supported by the control structure, during a seismic event.
2. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the structural member comprises a structural base or foundation, and the yield connector is directly connected between the rocker frame and the structural base or foundation.
3. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the structural member comprises a structural base or foundation, and the yield connector is connected between the rocker frame and a further structural member, the further structural member being pivotably connected to the structural base or foundation.
4. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 3 wherein the further structural member comprises a chord.
5. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the structural member is pivotably connected to a structural base or foundation.
6. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 further comprising a secondary flexural member provided between the yield connector and the structural member.
7. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the yield connector further comprises a flexural deflection limiter configured to stop flexure of a yielding element at a prescribed limit.
8. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 7 further comprising a secondary flexural member configured to yield upon the prescribed limit being reached.
9. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the yield connector comprises a pivot connector to connect to either the rocker frame or the structural member.
10. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the yield connector comprises a guide configured to receive and guide a connector configured to connect to either the rocker frame or the structural member.
11. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 10 wherein the yield connector comprises a pivot connector to connect to either the rocker frame or the structural member and the pivot connector is configured to maintain the connector orthogonal to the yield element.
12. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 10 wherein the connector comprises a part of one of: the structural member; the rocker frame; a further structural member.
13. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the yield element comprises a plate or a plurality of plates.
14. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the first anchor is configured for connection to the rocker frame and a second anchor for connection to the structural member.
15. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the yield element is displaced and increases in length between the first and second anchors during a seismic event.
16. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 15 wherein no membrane forces are generated in the yield element during displacement.
17. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the yield element undergoes plastic deformation at a yield zone intermediate the first anchor and second anchor during a seismic event as a result of relative oscillatory movement between the rocker frame and the structural member.
18. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the rocker frame comprises a vertical aspect and the structural member comprises a horizontal structural base or foundation.
19. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the rocker frame has a horizontal aspect and is pivotably connected at each end to vertical chords which are pivotably connected to a horizontal base or foundation.
20. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 1 wherein the rocker frame comprises part of, or is connected to, a shelving or racking or building structure.
21. A force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure comprising: a pivotable rocker frame having a pivot connection to a structural member and being configured to be connected to a shelving, racking or building structure, the pivotable rocker frame being configured to rotate about the pivot connection as the shelving, racking or building structure moves relative to the structural member in response to a seismic event, a yield connector comprising a resistively and resiliently deformable, elastoplastically yielding yield element, wherein the yield connector comprises a first anchor for direct or indirect connection to the rocker frame distal from the pivot connection and a second anchor for direct or indirect connection to the structural member, and wherein one of the first or second anchors is configured with a free translational and rotational boundary condition whereby the yield element is displaced and undergoes plastic deformation at a yield zone intermediate the first anchor and second anchor during a seismic event as a result of relative oscillatory movement between the rocker frame and the structural member, and wherein the yield connector maintains a constant resistive yield force to thereby control rotation of the rocker frame about the pivot connection, the constant resistive yield force limiting and controlling the magnitude of a dynamic response force developed within the control structure during the seismic event.
22. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure of claim 21 wherein the dynamic response force is independent of the magnitude of the seismic event.
23. A structure supported on a foundation, the structure comprising: a framework, the framework being connected to a pivotable rocker frame having a pivot connection to the foundation and being configured to rotate about the pivot connection as the framework moves relative to the structural member in response to a seismic event, a yield connector comprising a resistively and resiliently deformable, elastoplastically yielding yield element, and wherein the yield connector comprises a first anchor for direct or indirect connection to the rocker frame distal from the pivot connection and a second anchor for direct or indirect connection to the foundation, and wherein one of the first or second anchors is configured with a free translational and rotational boundary condition whereby the yield element is displaced and undergoes plastic deformation at a yield zone intermediate the first anchor and second anchor during a seismic event as a result of relative oscillatory movement between the rocker frame and the foundation, and wherein the yield connector maintains a constant resistive yield force to thereby control rotation of the rocker frame about the pivot connection, the constant resistive yield force limiting and controlling the magnitude of a dynamic response force developed within the framework during the seismic event.
24. The structure of claim 23 wherein a dynamic response force developed in the foundation during the seismic event is limited by the constant resistive yield force.
25. The structure of claim 23 wherein the framework has or supports a mass, and a dynamic response force developed in the mass during the seismic event is limited by the constant resistive yield force.
26. The structure of claim 23 wherein the dynamic response force is independent of the magnitude of the seismic event.
27. A force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure comprising: a pivotable rocker frame pivotably connected to a structural member, a yield connector located between and directly or indirectly connecting rocker frame to structural member, the yield connector comprising a resistively and resiliently deformable elastoplastically yielding yield element, the yield element having a first region connected to a first anchor and a second end region connected to a second anchor, the first and second anchor directly or indirectly connecting to the rocker frame or structural member, the yield connector configured with free translational or free translational and free rotational boundary conditions, wherein the second end, edge, or boundary region of the yield element, is able to translate or translate and rotate relative to the reaction surface or reaction point at its second anchor, and without generating membrane forces within the yield element, and wherein the resultant reaction force at the reaction surface or reaction point, is able to rotate as the yield element elastoplastically displaces, and remain orthogonal to the tangent plane at the reaction surface of the yield element, and wherein the horizontal component of the resultant reaction force acts in the same direction as the horizontal translation component of the displacing end region, the yield element able to elastoplastically displace while maintaining a constant resistive yield force, enabling the control structure to form an elastoplastic mechanism, able to cyclically displace and plastically flow, in response to a forcing event or in response to base motion input from a seismic event, with a constant resistive yield force, the seismic control structure able to control and limit its dynamic response and control and limit the response acceleration and dynamic response of a mass it is seismically supportive of.
28. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein the yield connector is connected between the rocker frame and a further structural member, the further structural member and rocker frame being pivotably connected to the structural member.
29. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 28 wherein the structural member and further structural member comprise pivotably connected chords.
30. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 6 wherein the secondary flexural member enables independent adjustment of the natural elastic response frequency of the control structure.
31. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 7 further comprising a secondary flexural member, wherein the secondary flexural member and the flexural deflection limiter enable the control structure to provide a two tier, elastic stiffening, ductile response.
32. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 13 wherein the or each plate is configured to flex about a minor bending axis and flexurally yield at a specific yield zone and is displaced to high elastoplastic displacements and high ductility values while maintaining the constant resistive yield force.
33. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein the yield element is displaced and freely increases and decreases in length between the first and second anchors during a seismic event.
34. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 33 wherein the length of the yield element along a flexing curve of the yield element is able to freely increase and decrease length between the first and second anchors and wherein reaction resultants rotate and remain orthogonal with a tangent plane of the yield element during a seismic event.
35. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 1, wherein the yield element has a spanning aspect and is configured with simply supported, flexurally continuous or flexurally restrained boundary conditions at the second end region.
36. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 29 wherein the yield connector is connected between the chords and wherein interlaminar displacement along and between the chords is resisted by a constant interlaminar shear force produced by flexural yielding of the yield element.
37. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein the yield element is able to cyclically displace to plastic strain values within the yield element along a positive yield plateau and to and beyond plastic strain values at maximum stress values within a strain hardening region of the stress-strain curve of the yielding material from which the yield element is formed.
38. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 14 wherein the yield connector comprises a casing and a guided pushrod, the pushrod linking the yield connector to the rocker frame, and the casing being pivotably connected to the structural member, and wherein the guided pushrod is configured to connect to the yield element at the first anchor, and the casing is configured to connect to the yield element at the second anchor.
39. A force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure comprising a rocker frame which is pivotably connected to a structural base or structural member, wherein rotation of the rocker frame about the pivotal connection causes a pivotably anchored flexural yield member which is directly or indirectly connected to the rocker frame, but distal to the rocker frame pivot, to flexurally displace, wherein the yield member is configured with a (i) free translational or (ii) free translational and free rotational boundary condition to allow it to flex and yield about its minor bending axis to high elastoplastic displacements and high ductility values while maintaining a constant resistive yield force, and wherein the structure is able to dissipate energy and limit forces developed within itself or a structure it connects with and is seismically supportive of as it endures ground or base motion input from a seismic event.
40. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 39 wherein the yield member comprises: a first anchor secured directly or indirectly to the rocker frame, a second anchor secured to another structural member of the control structure or to a foundation base, the flexural yield member having a first region and a second region spaced from the first region and located respectively by the first anchor and second anchor, whereby the first anchor secures the first region to the rocker frame so that the first region is able to move with the rocker frame relative to the second region and second structural member being another member of the control structure or foundation base, during a seismic event, and the second anchor allowing translation or translation and rotation of the second region relative to the second anchor during rocking movement of the rocker frame relative to the second structural member allowing the flexural yield member to flexurally yield while maintaining a stable constant resistive yield force.
41. The force limiting and energy dissipating seismic control structure as claimed in claim 40 wherein at the second region the flexural member is able to translate or translate and rotate relative to its respective anchor and at the other of the first or second regions the flexural member is pinned or cantilevered to its respective anchor.
Description
FIGURE DESCRIPTIONS
(1) The invention will now be described by way of example only and with reference to the drawings in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66) Alpha1 Rocker Frame
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110) Alpha2 Rocker Frame
(111)
(112)
(113)
(114)
(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123)
(124)
(125)
(126)
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)
(132)
(133)
(134)
(135)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(136) The invention relates to a control structure which helps direct and control the motion of connected force limiting and energy dissipating structural members (preferably a plate or plates of a yield anchor), which are capable of stable cycling high displacement elasto-plastic flexure about their minor bending axis, or out of plane bending.
(137) The invention comprises a device and mechanism, or more specifically a control structure with a pivoting rocker frame, which directs and governs the motion of a connected force limiting and energy dissipating structural plate(s) with connector (yielding connector or yield connector) which by its form is capable of producing a stable, constant resistive yield force while flexurally yielding about its minor (or out of plane) bending axis to high elasto-plastic displacements. The plate(s) action enables the control structure, it is a part of, to form a stable elasto-plastic mechanism which is able to flow and cycle to high elasto-plastic displacements with constant resistive force, in resistive response to ground (base) motion input, while internal forces within it or any adjacent structure it may also be seismically supportive of, are maintained and limited to maximum values which are a function of the yield force of the structural plates which are part of it.
(138) The control structure by governing the motion of the yielding plates within it in a controlled manner is subsequently modifying its own natural response (displacement, velocity, acceleration) and response of masses or adjacent structures it may be directly or indirectly seismically supportive of.
(139) By flowing as a stable, high displacement capable, elasto-plastic mechanism with constant resistive yield force; the control structure is limiting the magnitude of accelerations and dynamic forces that can develop within its members as it endures the ground motion (displacement, velocity, acceleration) input.
(140) That is, the control structure directs and controls the motion of the yielding plates; while the plates, yielding at a constant resistive force, limit the forces generated within the structure(s).
(141) The plates are effectively cushioning the control structures response to ground motion or base excitation.
(142) Contingent on the plates to limit the forces within the control structure and any connected structure; is their ability to sustain potentially high cycling elasto-plastic displacements (deformation) in a stable manner while maintaining a constant resistive yield force.
(143) The magnitude of the peak elasto-plastic displacement demand on the plates is a function of a number of variables including; ground motion (acceleration) input, mass seismically supported by structure and its distribution, elastic natural frequency of structure(s) (inclusive of plates) and yield strength of plate(s).
(144) The ability of the plate(s) to sustain the cycling peak displacement demands on them, while maintaining a stable constant resistive yield force is further dependent on their material stress-strain characteristics, and structural form.
(145) For convenience, reference will herein predominantly be made to an energy absorbing system 1000 control structure for use in or incorporated in a storage rack 3. It will be appreciated that other applications of the present invention exist. Such include but are not limited to high rise buildings.
(146) During a seismic event, as described previously, storage racks can sway in a lengthwise and width-wise direction.
(147) During a seismic event the equivalent force applied to the structure can be approximated to be acting at say around 70% the height of the storage rack 3 or load supporting structure. This does, depend on the weight distribution of goods supported on the rack 3.
(148) The system of the current invention can be incorporated (and retrofitted) to a storage rack or structure to modify and control the displacement, velocity and acceleration response of both the structure and masses supported by it, to ground motion (earthquake acceleration) input and limit the forces generated within the members of the rack structure or building structure and the control structure seismically supportive of it during a seismic event.
(149) The present invention utilises a system as part of or incorporated into a structure to restrain (but not prevent) the structure against movement during a seismic event and dissipate energy during movement. The present invention incorporates a rocker 2000 as part of a substantially stiff control structure that incorporates at least one yield connector to (c) transfer movement induced forces from the upper region of a storage rack or building structure to the foundation, and (d) intermediate of the foundation and the upper region through plastic yielding of the yield members (plates) of the control structure, limit forces that could develop both within the control structure and any adjacent structure it is seismically supportive of (rack or building).
(150) The simple structural behaviour of the yield plate of the yield connector 230 allows for its performance to be both load tested and/or calculated accurately. Its design is such that its yield force and energy absorbing performance remains predictable during each movement cycle of the control structure and storage rack during a seismic event. The yield connector utilises a flexure member 100, that is able to deform. The flexure member 100 (also herein referred to as the plate) is designed or has its performance known for its intended purpose. As such the more accurate the analysis of it the more simplified the design of the overall structure can be and the more predictable the outcome will be during a seismic event. Further to this, it is important that the flexure member 100 (plate) is not able to develop tensile or compressive membrane forces within itself as it flexes to high transverse plastic displacements during yield. Membrane forces generated within a yielding member (plate) will both increase the (plate) stiffness and result in an increasing force resistance within the plate with increased deformation. This in turn will reduce its energy dissipating and force limiting ability, resulting in higher forces being developed in both the control structure and any adjacent structure the control structure may be seismically supportive of.
(151)
(152) The pivot anchor 240 provides a dedicated pivot for rotational movement of the frame 280 of the control structure it is part of. The movement is constrained at least in part by the yield connectors 230 that are disposed outwardly from each side of the pivot anchor 240 in the lengthwise direction. Preferably the pivot anchor 240 is located centrally and intermediate two spaced apart connectors 230A and 230B. Preferably the connectors 230A and 230B are the same.
(153) In some embodiments, the rocker 2000 comprises a frame 280 which engages the two spaced apart yield connectors 230 and the pivot anchor 240. The frame 280 may be part of the storage rack or be incorporated therewith preferably to extend and be secured (directly or indirectly) to an upper region 27 of the storage rack 3 or to each floor of a general building structure. The upwardly extending parts of the frame 280 connecting to the storage rack allow for some or all of the forces from the swaying of the rack 3 or structure to be transferred to the pivot anchor 240 and the yield plates of the connector 230. The motion of the frame 280 being compatible with the motion of the rack 3 or structure. The connection between the control structure and any other adjacent structures it is seismically supportive of must be compatible with the motion of the control structure. For example a vertically slotted pinned connection at the centrelines of the frame pivot 240 or chord base pivots 315. The frame 280 may be short as shown in
(154)
(155) The energy absorbing system 1000 (control structure) may be joined to an upper region 27 of a storage rack 3. This may be two thirds up the height of the storage rack 3. This is a typical approximation of where the equivalent applied forces from seismic activity may be focused. It is envisaged that a person skilled in the art will realise that the energy absorbing system 1000 may be engaged at any height to a storage rack depending on the characteristics of stiffness required for the rack.
(156) Preferably the energy absorbing system 1000 comprises a top attachment 250. The top attachment 250 is be configured to attach to a member such as bracing 26 (sometimes known in the industry as plan bracing) of the storage rack 3. If the bracing is a strut or other similar stiff member, preferably this top attachment can pivoted so it does not create any torque or moments in the frame 280 or rack 3.
(157) The bracing 26 is merely a method of connecting the top of the frame 280 or top attachment 250 to the storage rack 3. Where two racks are provided back to back, bracing is typically located intermediate of the racks as shown in
(158) The plan bracing 26 can span two or more racks. Intermediate the two racks is gap 23 where the energy absorbing system 1000 is located. In alternative embodiments the energy absorbing system 1000 is located at the front face of a storage rack or on both the front and back face.
(159) The frame 280 is preferably a relatively stiff structure compared to the flexible nature of the flexure member 100 (yield plates). Preferably the frame 280 is of a truss type configuration. The truss may be of a multitude of designs and configurations as appropriate for the construction and required functional characteristics of the energy absorbing system 1000. In applications to general building structures a stiff planar reinforced concrete element could also be used for frame 280 (
(160) As briefly described earlier, the energy absorbing system 1000 (control structure) is connected or able to be connected to the storage rack 3 or other structure at or near its upper region 27. It is retrofittable to the storage rack or other structure. Given that the stiff frame 280 has little internal displacement (distortion) under applied load, the stiff frame 280 gets rocked or rotated about the pivot anchor 240. The role of the frame 280 is to transfer forces during length wise movement from the upper region 27 to the pivot 240. The rocking movement about the pivot anchor 240 is transferred to the spaced apart yield connectors 230. The rocking movement is then at least partially absorbed by the flexure members 100 (yield plates) as these plastically flex. For example, as shown in
(161)
(162) This embodiment is referenced by numerals 300. I.e. the frame 280, is referenced as the frame 280 and so forth. In this example, the energy absorbing system 1000 effectively comprises two pivot anchors connected by a frame 380. The frame 380 pivots about each pivot anchor 340 and also connects to yield plates which are set within their own rockers. The yield connectors 331-334 are comprised of yield plates supported within yield plate rockers.
(163) The energy absorbing system 1000 locates a rocker 2000 intermediate of two substantially stiff vertical chords 310 (also known as vertical chords) that can sway relative to the ground. The vertical chords 310 are pivotally connected by pivot anchors 315 to the foundation 4. The vertical chords 310 are shown schematically in
(164) The frame 380 is preferably a stiff truss like configuration, as described previously, to help transfer forces and movement between the two vertical chords 310. The functionality of the two pivot rocker 2000 is much the same as the rocker 2000 previously described. It comprises pivot anchors 240 that allow the frame to pivot relative the vertical chords 310. The yield connectors 331-334 and the frame pivots 240 in this embodiment are not anchoring the rocker 2000 or frame 380 directly to the foundation, but anchoring the frame 380 to each vertical chord 310 that in turn is pivotally anchored to the foundation 4. The foundation 4 is the floor of a structure, a foundation, or a beam or truss type system.
(165) The pivot anchor 315 is engaged to the foundation 4 and defines a rotational axis parallel to the foundation 4 and perpendicular to the lengthwise direction of the storage rack 3. In the preferred embodiment the upper regions 312 of the stiff vertical chords 310 may or may not be connected/engaged with the upper region of the storage rack 3 or building structure.
(166) In a preferred embodiment, there is a first upper yield connector 331 and a second upper yield connector 332 respectively connected to a first of said vertical chords 313 and a second of said vertical chords 314. Furthermore there is a lower first yield connector 333 and a lower second yield connector 334 connected to respective first vertical chord 313 and second vertical chord 314. The flexure members 100 (plates)of the upper yield connectors 331 and 332 deflect in the opposite direction of movement of the storage rack 3 during lengthwise movement of the storage rack 3, and the lower yield connectors 333 and 334 deflect in the direction of lateral movement of the storage rack 3 during seismic activity.
(167) The frame 380 stays substantially horizontal during motion and together with the yield connectors 331-334 allows, yet resists, the racking movement of the energy absorbing structure.
(168) One type of yield connector 230 that may be used for many embodiments (excluding
(169) As discussed previously, it is ideal that tensile or compressive membrane forces do not develop in the flexure member 100 (plate). Briefly, the connector should allow for the flexure members 100 end regions 231, 232 to translate freely without impediment or restriction, or being encumbered, fettered or the like with the foundation 4 during a yielding condition. The ability of the end regions 231, 232 to translate relatively freely during yielding or lifting of the flexure member is preferred to allow the flexure member 100 to be pulled and deformed/deflected into a curve. In other words the yield member 100 plates are free to flex simply without generating any tensile or compressive membrane forces in the end regions 231, 232 and hence within themselves and for the simply spanning plate, shown in
(170) In one embodiment the flexure member may be described as a simply supported beam. Where a simply supported beam is well known and defined in classical mechanics. A simply supported beam, in one embodiment has a pinned end end condition at one end of a beam or plate (herein the flexure member), and a translational and pinned end end condition at the other end of a beam plate as shown in
(171) The yield connector must also allow for relatively easy lateral translation of a flexure member 100 end region during yielding. This lateral translation during yielding, allows the flexure member 100 to be drawn up with the rocker 2000 or rack during yielding without stretching, or generating membrane tension in the flexure member, or prying at the end regions. And subsequently the substantially lateral translation of an end region allows the flexure member 100 to be driven in the opposite direction, during its operational yielding in the opposite direction, without the flexure member 100 crumpling or kinking.
(172)
(173)
(174) A detailed view of the pivot anchor 340 engaged to a vertical chord 310 as per the configuration of
(175) The connection of the yielding member (plate) to the horizontal base 4 shown in
(176) A more ideal connection is shown schematically in
(177) The rockers function is to help maintain an orthogonal loading to the yield plate(s) supported and contained within its casing while the yield plate(s); loaded by the pin ended tension/compression ties (push rods) of the rocker frame, undergo high transverse elasto-plastic displacements.
(178) The rockers pivots may be either concentric with or eccentric to the yield plate(s) contained within it.
(179)
(180)
(181)
(182)
(183)
(184) In
(185) In
(186)
(187)
(188)
(189) A similar but less ideal yield plate rocker is also shown in
(190) Further arrangements and combinations of rocker frames, yield plate rockers and non-tensioning yield plates are presented in figures subtitled alpha1 rocker frame and alpha1 rocker frame
(191) Here rocker frames (e.g. frame 280), yield plates (e.g. flexure member 100) and yield plate rockers (e.g. yield plate connectors 230) are more specifically categorised; respectively as alpha frames (types alpha1 and alpha2), delta plates (types delta.sub.1 to delta.sub.6) and beta rockers (types beta.sub.1, beta.sub.2).
(192)
(193) In a further embodiment as shown in
(194) Alternatively the embodiment shown in
(195)
(196) An example of an energy absorbing structure 1000 (control structure) in a general building structure form is shown in
(197) A further embodiment of an energy absorbing system 1000—‘shear type’ embodiment, with ‘shear type’ yield connectors 230, is shown in
(198) Here flexural yielding in the plates is a co-reactive response to the inter-lamina shear forces and displacements generated between the exterior chord and interior frame chord as the (alpha.sub.2) control structure sways in response to ground motion input.
(199)
(200) The vertical chords 310 are preferably either tied at their top or upper region to the same rack 2, or they are not constrained and the frame 280 is constrained to the rack 2 or plan bracing. Alternatively, both the chords and the rocker are directly engaged with the rack 2.
(201) Examples of the shear transfer yield plates are shown in
(202) In a further embodiment as shown in
(203) Both the energy absorbing system 1000 and the horizontal chords 510 are retained and engaged intermediate two vertical chords 310 as previously described. In this embodiment, the energy absorbing system 1000 shares the same shear type yield connectors 230 as described earlier. The horizontal chords 510 are pivotally attached at each of their ends to the two spaced apart vertical chords 510.
(204) The relative movement of the vertical chords 310 and the rocker 2000, creates relative movement at the yield connectors 230. This produces flexure and yielding in the yield plates (yield members 100).
(205) The shear type yield connectors 230 as used in the vertical or horizontal shear embodiment are shown in detail in
(206) As stated previously all yield plates within and part of a control structure (designated as delta plates in the figures) are detailed to be free to translate at, at least one end region so as to help avoid self-generate internal membrane forces when flexing to high elasto-plastic displacements.
(207) The flexure member 100 is preferably connected at its end regions 231 and 232. The end regions of each flexure member 100 are connected to, or engage with, a stiffened or reinforced structure of the yield connector. The yield connector 230 is engaged intermediate or is integral with a) the vertical chord 310 and rocker 2000, in the vertical embodiment, or b) the horizontal chord 510 and rocker 2000, in the horizontal embodiment.
(208) In one embodiment as shown in
(209) Because the flexure member 100 is not translationally connected to the respective structure (i.e. it can slide relative to), the entire system must be tied together. For this reason, rigid but end pin connected ties 400 should be utilised to connect the vertical chords 310 to the rocker 2000. The ties 400 are preferably pin connected to the centrelines of the exterior chords 310 and the centreline of the frame 1000. The ties 400 are seen in
(210) The flexure members 100 herein described are force limiting and energy dissipating structural plates which transfer inter-lamina shear forces from exterior chord to interior chord of rocker frame through minor axis flexure and shear, and dissipate energy by minor axis flexural yielding.
(211) Preferably the entire system is composed substantially of metal. Even more preferably, composed of steel. The pivotable anchors, chords, frame, trusses are substantially stiff and rigid so as not to yield during a seismic event. There are variations that are available to an engineer to design the trusses, body, chords et cetera so they can withstand appropriate forces. For example the frame 280 could comprise a stiff planar reinforced concrete element (
(212) In further embodiments, any of the embodiments above may utilise a secondary flexure member for added resilience (
(213) By adjusting the relative strengths and elastic stiffness's of the yield plates and secondary flexure member a bi-linear elastic stiffening system can be developed in which yield can occur in one member only (either plate or secondary member) or both.
(214) A further embodiment is where a spring or elastic structural component is added to the pin ended ties connecting the frame 280 to the yield connectors in the alphas frame or a spring added at the connection of the exterior chords to the horizontal or vertical bases of the shear action alpha.sub.2 frames. This allows an independent adjustment of the control structures natural elastic frequency.
(215) Where a ground 2 has been mentioned, it is envisaged that the ground could also be a floor or ceiling of a building or structure, a beam, or truss, or part of a structure that is engaged to the anti-racking system as described.
(216) It is appreciated that where all of these structures and systems herein described are symmetrical, the systems may be halved or doubled or so forth and still be effective. For example the energy absorbing system 1000, may only have one yield connector 232 on one side of the pivot anchor 240. In a similar fashion, the energy absorbing system 400
(217) The embodiments described above may be altered and combined together to form further embodiments. A person skilled in the art will realise that these configurations can be adapted to suit many different purposes and functional characteristics of a structure or storage rack. Such as the height of the structure or storage rack, the number of storage racks to restrain, the weight of the structure or storage rack, the weight of the goods or structure, the tendency and frequency and magnitude of seismic events where the structure or rack is installed. Furthermore these configurations may be adapted depending on the materials used and the factor of safety required.
(218) Further variations of a system 1000 (control structure) are shown in
(219) During a seismic event the forces transferred through the ties 300 are tensile forces. More than one tie 300 can be attached to a rocker 2000. The rocker 2000 is preferably provided intermediate two ties 300. In alternative embodiments, the rocker 2000 may be at the end of a rack and only attached to a single tie 300.
(220) The ties 300 have a low elasticity and minimal deformation during seismic activity. Preferably the ties 300 are metal cables. However the ties 300 may be braided line, or solid bar or the like. Any material and geometry substantially strong enough to take the tensile forces with low deformation may be used for the ties 300.
(221) The rocker 2000 (
(222) Preferably, the material variables of the rocker 2000, and more specifically the flexure member(s) 100, do not change significantly after each cycle. Importantly, the variables that stay substantially similar are the yield strength and elastic stiffness of the flexure member(s) 100. Preferably the flexure member(s) 100 has 1) a stable and constant cycling yield strength and 2) a stable and constant cycling elastic stiffness.
(223) Because the structural behaviour of the yield plates (flexure member 100) is simple to calculate or verify by load test their performance can be accurately assessed. This allows the performance of the control structure and any adjacent structure it seismically supports to also be accurately assessed. For example, the stiffness, deflection and deformation in operation, weaknesses, stress concentrations et cetera are able to be readily calculated. This allows the design of the rocker 2000 to be specifically designed. As such the more simplified the design can be, and the more accurate the analysis can be.
(224) The rocker 2000 of the present invention utilises the flexure member(s) 100 that throughout the oscillating forces does not significantly change its material properties. This is achieved by detailing the yielding members (plates) to be free to translate (slide) so as to simply flex without developing any membrane forces within themselves.
(225)
(226) These control structures are seismically supportive of load carrying rack structures or general building structures. Connection of these structures to the control structures is through typically inclined tensile cables or rods.
(227)
(228)
(229)
(230)
(231)
(232)
(233)
(234)
(235)
(236)
(237) In
(238)
(239)
(240)
(241) The base member allows i. the fixing (anchor) forces to the foundation (base) generated by the moment couple from the counter directional yield force in the yield plates to be reduced by leverage through the base member about its central pivot. ii. the natural elastic frequency and force/displacement characteristics of the control structure, in conjunction with any other structure it is seismically supportive of, to be adjusted independently. iii. As discussed previously from
(242) The rocker 2000 in most instances is intermediate two ties 300 of a racked system. In alternative embodiments, the tie anchor may be at the end of a rack system and only attached to a single tie 300 (not shown). The examples shown in
(243) The desirability of having two ties 300, acting in opposite directions, is due to the cycling response of the restrained structure during a seismic event.
(244) The ties are typically in cable or rod form and are only able to carry tensile loads. Hence at any time only one tie is engaged in load transfer from main structure to energy absorbing system 1000 (control structure). Load and motion reversal between both the main structure and ground results in switching tensile loads in the ties, the rocking of 2000 and the yield working of plates 401 and 402. With only one tie 300, after deformation in one direction, racking during the next cycle will incur slack in the tie 300 due to the previous deformation. However, one tie may be used albeit with less effectiveness than two tie, this could be at the ends of a rack where one tie is better than no ties to a tie anchor (
(245) In an alternative embodiment as shown in
(246) Preferably the entire rocker 2000 is substantially composed of metal. Even more preferably, the rocker 2000 is composed of steel. The rocker, rocker arms, upstand, and anchors are substantially stiff and rigid so as not to yield during a seismic event. There are many alternatives in the design to fabricate a rigid rocker frame.
(247) Where a foundation 4 has been mentioned, it is envisaged that the ground could also be a floor or ceiling of a building or structure, a beam, or truss, or part of a structure that is engaged to the anti-racking system as described.
(248) It is appreciated that where all of these structures and systems herein described are symmetrical, the systems may be halved or double or so forth and still be effective. For example the energy absorbing system 1000 may only have one yield connector 230 on one side of the pivot anchor 240.
(249) The embodiments described above may be altered and combined together to form further embodiments. A person skilled in the art will realise that these configurations can be adapted to suit many different purposes and functional characteristics of a structure or storage rack. Such as the height of the structure or storage rack, the number of storage racks to restrain, the weight of the structure or storage rack, the weight of the goods or structure, the tendency and frequency and magnitude of seismic events where the structure or rack is installed. Furthermore these configurations may be adapted depending on the materials used and the factor of safety required.
(250) Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to elements or integers having known equivalents, then such equivalents are included as if they were individually set forth.
(251) Although the invention has been described by way of example and with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that modifications and/or improvements may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.