Efficient antifouling and hydrophilic polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane and preparation method thereof

Abstract

A preparation method of an antifouling and hydrophilic polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane includes through the .sup.60Co-γ radiation grafting chemical modification method, evenly distributing an ionic liquid on a surface of a polyethersulfone material, wherein the ionic liquid containing unsaturated bonds is connected with the polyethersulfone material through chemical bonds, and then obtaining an asymmetric porous membrane by the immersion-precipitation phase transformation method, and finally performing Soxhlet extraction on the porous membrane, so as to migrate the grafted ionic liquid from an interior of the porous membrane to a surface of the porous membrane to be enriched, so that the adsorption and antibacterial properties of the porous membrane are improved. A mass ratio of the ionic liquid to the polyethersulfone material is in a range of (2-11):100. The ultrafiltration membrane is an asymmetric porous membrane, and has excellent antifouling properties, good pure water flux and a good BSA retention rate.

Claims

1. A preparation method of an efficient antifouling and hydrophilic polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration membrane, the preparation method comprising steps of: (1) obtaining a mixed solution by mixing a PES solution with an ionic liquid (IL) and a solvent according to a mass ratio in a reactor, wherein the mass ratio of the ionic liquid to the PES solution is in a range of (2-11):100, the ionic liquid is an ionic liquid containing unsaturated bonds; (2) obtaining a mixed PES/IL blend film by casting the mixed solution, followed by removing the solvent by drying; (3) obtaining an IL grafted PES (PES-g-IL) film by performing radiation on the mixed PES/IL blend film in a polyethylene plastic bag, wherein the radiation is .sup.60Co-γ radiation at room temperature in air or nitrogen environment with a radiation dose of 30 kGy; and (4) preparing the PES-g-IL film into a solution, and obtaining a PES-g-IL porous membrane from the solution through immersion-precipitation phase inversion method.

2. The preparation method according to claim 1, further comprising performing Soxhlet extraction on the PES porous membrane, so as to enrich the ionic liquid on a surface of the PES porous membrane.

3. The preparation method according to claim 1, wherein the ionic liquid containing unsaturated bonds is an imidazole ionic liquid whose cationic structural formula is ##STR00002## wherein R1 is C1-C24 alkyl or C2-C24 alkenyl, R2 is C2-C24 alkenyl, an anion in the ionic liquid is PF.sub.6.sup.−, BF.sub.4.sup.−, Br.sup.−, Cl.sup.−, I.sup.−, NO.sub.3.sup.−, CF.sub.3CO.sub.2.sup.−, CH.sub.3COO.sup.− or (CF.sub.3SO.sub.3).sub.2N.sup.−.

4. The preparation method according to claim 2, wherein performing Soxhlet extraction on the PES porous membrane at a temperature in a range of 80° C. to 120° C. for 1 h to 48 h in methanol.

5. The preparation method according to claim 1, wherein in the step (1), mixing the PES solution with the ionic liquid at 60° C.

6. The preparation method according to claim 1, wherein in the step (1), the solvent is N,N-dimethylformamide.

7. An antifouling and hydrophilic polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane prepared by the preparation method according to claim 1.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024] FIGS. 1-1(1)-FIGS. 1-1(6) are SEM images of the first comparative example (pure PES porous membrane), the first embodiment (2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the second embodiment (4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the third embodiment (6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the second comparative example (10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane), respectively, wherein a, b and c are microstructure of the cross section, upper surface and lower surface of every sample, respectively.

[0025] FIG. 1-2(1) and FIG. 1-2(2) are SEM images of the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the fifth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane), respectively, wherein a, b and c are microstructure of the cross section, upper surface and lower surface of every sample, respectively.

[0026] FIG. 1-3(a) and FIG. 1-3(b) are SEM element analysis diagrams of the fifth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane) and the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), respectively.

[0027] FIG. 2-1 is a contact angle diagram of the first comparative example (pure PES porous membrane), the first embodiment (2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the second embodiment (4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the third embodiment (6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the second comparative example (10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane).

[0028] FIG. 2-2 is a contact angle diagram of the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the fifth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane).

[0029] FIG. 3 is a pure water flux diagram of the first comparative example (pure PES porous membrane), the first embodiment (2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the second embodiment (4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the third embodiment (6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the second comparative example (10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane).

[0030] FIG. 4-1 is a flux recovery and loss diagram of the first comparative example (pure PES porous membrane), the first embodiment (2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the second embodiment (4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the third embodiment (6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the second comparative example (10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane).

[0031] FIG. 4-2 is a flux recovery and loss diagram of the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the fifth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

[0032] The present invention is explained in detail with reference to drawings and embodiments, but the present invention is not limited to the scope of these embodiments.

[0033] In the embodiments and comparative examples thereof provided by the present invention, the polymer PES (polyethersulfone) is used as the matrix. The polymer PES is produced by BASF SE and has the model of ULTRASON E6020P.

[0034] The imidazole ionic liquid (IL) containing unsaturated bonds used in the embodiments is 1-vinyl-3-butylimidazole tetrafluoroborate solution.

First Embodiment

[0035] Step (1): firstly, add 9.8 g of PES and 0.2 g of 1-vinyl-3-butylimidazole tetrafluoroborate solution into a reactor, mix at 60° C. for 6 h, cool down to room temperature, pour into a PTFE (poly tetra fluoroethylene) mold, volatilize solvent and dry under vacuum for 24 h to form a PES/IL blend film, and obtain an IL grafted PES (PES-g-IL) film by radiating the PES/IL blend film at an adsorbed dose of 30 kGy under room temperature, wherein .sup.60Co-γ is a radiation source.

[0036] Step (2): perform Soxhlet extraction with methanol for 24 h and followed by vacuum drying on the PES-g-IL film obtained by the step (1), prepare a casting solution with a concentration of 20% from the extracted film, coat the casting solution on a glass plate, and obtain a 2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane through immersion-precipitation phase inversion method in a coagulation bath.

Second Embodiment

[0037] Step (1): firstly, add 9.6 g of PES and 0.4 g of 1-vinyl-3-butylimidazole tetrafluoroborate solution into a reactor, mix at 60° C. for 6 h, cool down to room temperature, pour into a PTFE (poly tetra fluoroethylene) mold, volatilize solvent and dry under vacuum for 24 h to form a PES/IL blend film, and radiate the PES/IL blend film at an adsorbed dose of 30 kGy under room temperature, wherein .sup.60Co-γ is a radiation source.

[0038] Step (2): perform Soxhlet extraction with methanol for 24 h and followed by vacuum drying on the radiated film obtained by the step (1), prepare a casting solution with a concentration of 20% from the extracted film, coat the casting solution on a glass plate, and obtain a 4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane through immersion-precipitation phase inversion method in a coagulation bath.

Third Embodiment

[0039] Step (1): firstly, add 9.4 g of PES and 0.6 g of 1-vinyl-3-butylimidazole tetrafluoroborate solution into a reactor, mix at 60° C. for 6 h, cool down to room temperature, pour into a PTFE (poly tetra fluoroethylene) mold, volatilize solvent and dry under vacuum for 24 h to form a PES/IL blend film, and radiate the PES/IL blend film at an adsorbed dose of 30 kGy under room temperature, wherein .sup.60Co-γ is a radiation source.

[0040] Step (2): perform Soxhlet extraction with methanol for 24 h and followed by vacuum drying on the radiated film obtained by the step (1), prepare a casting solution with a concentration of 20% from the extracted film, coat the casting solution on a glass plate, and obtain a 6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane through immersion-precipitation phase inversion method in a coagulation bath.

Fourth Embodiment

[0041] Step (1): firstly, add 9.0 g of PES and 1.0 g of 1-vinyl-3-butylimidazole tetrafluoroborate solution into a reactor, mix at 60° C. for 6 h, cool down to room temperature, pour into a PTFE (poly tetra fluoroethylene) mold, volatilize solvent and dry under vacuum for 24 h to form a PES/IL blend film, and radiate the PES/IL blend film at an adsorbed dose of 30 kGy under room temperature, wherein .sup.60Co-γ is a radiation source.

[0042] Step (2): perform Soxhlet extraction with methanol for 24 h and followed by vacuum drying on the radiated film obtained by the step (1), prepare a casting solution with a concentration of 20% from the extracted film, coat the casting solution on a glass plate, and obtain a 10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane through immersion-precipitation phase inversion method in a coagulation bath.

Fifth Embodiment

[0043] Perform surface treatment on the 10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane prepared by the fourth embodiment at 100° C. for 48 h, and obtain a 10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane after drying.

First Comparative Example

[0044] Step (1): firstly, add 10.0 g of PES into a reactor, dissolve at 60° C. for 6 h, cool down to room temperature, pour into a PTFE mold, volatilize solvent and dry under vacuum for 24 h to form a PES film.

[0045] Step (2): prepare a casting solution with a concentration of 20%, coat the casting solution on a glass plate, and obtain a pure PES porous membrane through immersion-precipitation phase inversion method in a coagulation bath.

Second Comparative Example

[0046] Step (1): firstly, add 9.0 g of PES and 1.0 g of 1-vinyl-3-butylimidazole tetrafluoroborate solution into a reactor, mix at 60° C. for 6 h, cool down to room temperature, pour into a PTFE (poly tetra fluoroethylene) mold, volatilize solvent and dry under vacuum for 24 h to form a PES/IL blend film, and radiate the PES/IL blend film at an adsorbed dose of 30 kGy under room temperature, wherein an electron beam is a radiation source.

[0047] Step (2): perform Soxhlet extraction with methanol for 24 h and followed by vacuum drying on the radiated film obtained by the step (1), prepare a casting solution with a concentration of 20% from the extracted film, coat the casting solution on a glass plate, and obtain a 10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane through immersion-precipitation phase inversion method in a coagulation bath.

[0048] The structure and properties of the porous membranes obtained by the first, second, third and fourth embodiments and the first and second comparative examples are characterized systematically.

[0049] As shown in FIGS. 1-1(1)-FIGS. 1-1(6), the 2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane obtained by the first embodiment, the 4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane obtained by the second embodiment, the 6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane obtained by the third embodiment, the 10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane obtained by the fourth embodiment, the pure PES porous membrane obtained by the first comparative example, and the 10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane obtained by the second comparative example are analyzed with SEM (scanning electron microscope). It is able to seen that the grafting of ionic liquid has a great influence on the membrane structure of PES. The number of finger pores is increased significantly, the distribution density thereof is increased, the pore size on the upper surface of the membranes are increased, and the finger pores are more penetrating. It is believed that the grafting of the ionic liquid leads to the improvement of hydrophilicity of molecular chains of PES, which accelerates the diffusion rate of molecular chains into the coagulation bath, so that the membrane pores are increased in number and size. This explains the subsequent increase in flux. However, the sample which takes the electron beam as the radiation source is unable to be grafted with the ionic liquid, so that the hydrophilic modification effect of the ionic liquid to PES is unable to be reflected, and there is no obvious effect on the morphology of the membrane pores.

[0050] According to FIG. 1-2(1) and FIG. 1-2(2), the microstructure of PES modified porous membrane has not changed significantly after subjecting to Soxhlet extraction, indicating that the surface treatment by Soxhlet extraction has little effect on the pore structure of the PES modified porous membrane.

[0051] FIG. 1-3(a) and FIG. 1-3(b) are SEM element analysis diagrams of the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the fifth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane), respectively. The results show that the grafted ionic liquid is able to migrate to the surface of the PES modified porous membrane after Soxhlet extraction. Therefore, the SEM element analysis diagram of the fifth embodiment shows more characteristic elements of the ionic liquid.

[0052] As shown in Table 1, the grafting of ionic liquid significantly improves the BSA retention rate of the PES modified porous membrane, which is mainly due to the improved hydrophilicity because of the grafting of ionic liquid. The ionic liquid is able to form a layer of water membrane on the surface of the porous membrane, so as to retain BSA macromolecules, and simultaneously, the dense pores on the surface of the porous membrane are also able to play a role in the retention of these macromolecules. However, in the second comparative example, since the ionic liquid is unable to be grafted, the retention performance of the porous membrane to BSA is not improve significantly.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Determination of BSA retention rate of BSA provided by the embodiments (PES modified porous membrane with different ionic liquid content) and comparative examples First Second Sample Comparative First Second Third Fourth Fifth Comparative name Example Embodiment Embodiment Embodiment Embodiment Embodiment Example BSA 40 80 73 79 83 85 45 Retention Rate (%)

[0053] FIG. 2-1 is a contact angle diagram of the first embodiment (2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the second embodiment (4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the third embodiment (6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the first comparative example (pure PES porous membrane), and the second comparative example (10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane). It is able to be seen that the ionic liquid itself has good hydrophilicity, and the PES grafted with the ionic liquid also shows the improvement of the hydrophilicity. As the content of the ionic liquid increases, the contact angle of the porous membrane becomes smaller and smaller, which also highlights an important feature of the present invention that the grafting of ionic liquid has a hydrophilic modification effect on PES, and with the improvement of hydrophilicity, the antifouling performance of the PES modified porous membrane grafted with the ionic liquid is greatly improved. The reason is that the improvement of hydrophilicity leads to the formation of a layer of water membrane on the surface of the PES porous membrane, which improves the antifouling performance of the PES membrane.

[0054] FIG. 2-2 is a contact angle diagram of the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane) and the fifth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane). The results show that the contact angle of the 10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane provided by the fifth embodiment is lower after extraction process, showing better hydrophilicity.

[0055] FIG. 3 is a pure water flux diagram of the first embodiment (2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the second embodiment (4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the third embodiment (6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the fourth embodiment (10 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the first comparative example (pure PES porous membrane) and the second comparative example (10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane). The above-mentioned phenomena, such as the increase of the diameter of membrane pores on the upper and lower surfaces of the porous membrane, the more penetrating finger pores, and the improvement of hydrophilicity, are responsible for the greatly improved pure water flux of the PES modified porous membrane.

[0056] FIG. 4-1 is a flux recovery and loss diagram of the first embodiment (2 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the second embodiment (4 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the third embodiment (6 wt % IL-PES modified porous membrane), the first comparative example (pure PES porous membrane), and the second comparative example (10 wt %-PES-electron beam radiated porous membrane). R.sub.t, R.sub.r and R.sub.ir represent total loss flux, reversible loss flux and irreversible loss flux, respectively. Therefore, it is concluded that the PES porous membrane grafted with the ionic liquid loses less flux, and the flux that is able to be recovered after BSA contamination is greater. As a result, it is believed that the PES-g-IL porous membrane has antifouling property. Besides, PES-g-IL porous membrane is able to prevent protein contamination and recover flux performance after BSA filtration, which is also the main object of the present invention.

[0057] As shown in FIG. 4-2, the fifth embodiment shows lower total loss flux, irreversible loss flux and higher reversible loss flux, indicating that the grafted ionic liquid is able to migrate to the surface of the PES modified porous membrane, so the 10 wt % IL-PES extracted modified porous membrane has better antifouling performance.

[0058] The above-mentioned embodiments are not a limitation of the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiments. Any content that meets the requirements of the present invention belongs to the protection scope of the present invention.