Fault detection in hybrid DC-DC power convertors
11293992 · 2022-04-05
Assignee
Inventors
- Mojtaba Ashourloo (Toronto, CA)
- Venkata Raghuram Namburi (Brampton, CA)
- Gerard Villar Piqué (Eindhoven, NL)
- John Pigott (Phoenix, AZ)
- Olivier Trescases (Toronto, CA)
- Hendrik Bergveld (Eindhoven, NL)
- Alaa Eldin Y El Sherif (Plano, TX, US)
Cpc classification
H02M3/07
ELECTRICITY
H02M1/32
ELECTRICITY
H02M1/0095
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
There are disclosed fault detection circuits and methods for an N-to-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter. A short circuit fault detection circuit comprises: first and second measuring circuits configured to measure first and second voltages, Vsw1, Vsw2, at the switching node in the first and second state; first and second calculation circuits configured to calculate first and second absolute error voltage as an absolute difference of the respective first and second voltages in one operating cycle (Vsw1[n−1], Vsw2[n−1]) and in a next subsequent operating cycle (Vsw1[n], Vsw2[n]); and first and second fault circuits configured to provide first and second fault outputs indicative of a fault in response to the respective first or second absolute error voltage exceeding a short-circuit-trip level. Open circuit fault detection circuits and methods are also disclosed.
Claims
1. A fault detection circuit for a N-to-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter having at least (N−1) level-setting capacitors, an input terminal for receiving an input voltage, a ground terminal, and a switching node connected to an inductor, and operational according to an operating cycle comprising first, second and third states; the fault detection circuit comprising: a first measuring circuit configured to measure a first voltage, VSW1, at the switching node in the first state in which first and second sets of the level-setting capacitors are being charged and discharged; a first calculation circuit configured to calculate a first error voltage as a difference of the first voltage in one operating cycle (VSW1[n−1]) and in a next subsequent operating cycle (VSW1 [n]); a first fault circuit configured to provide a first fault output indicative of a fault in response to an absolute value of the first error voltage exceeding a short-circuit-trip level; a second measuring circuit configured to measure a second voltage, VSW2, at the switching node in the second state in which the first and second sets of the level-setting capacitors are being respectively discharged and charged; a second calculation circuit configured to calculate a second error voltage as a difference of the second voltage in one operating cycle (VSW2[n−1] and in a next subsequent operating cycle (VSW2[n]); and a second fault circuit configured to provide a second fault output indicative of a fault in response to an absolute value of the second error voltage exceeding the short-circuit-trip level.
2. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first and second calculation circuits, and the first and second fault circuits are digital circuits.
3. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: a third measuring circuit configured to measure the input voltage; a third calculation circuit configured to calculate a third error voltage as the value of: the sum of the first and the second voltage in one operating cycle minus 2/N times the input voltage; and a third fault detection circuit configured to provide a third fault output indicative of a fault in response to an absolute value of the second error voltage exceeding an open-circuit-trip level.
4. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 3, wherein the first, second and third calculation circuits, and the first, second and third fault circuits are digital circuits.
5. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 4, further comprising a circuit providing a summary fault output in response to at least one of the first, second and third fault outputs being indicative of a fault.
6. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 4, wherein each of the first, second and third measuring circuits comprise an analog-to-digital converter.
7. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 4, wherein each of the first, second and third measuring circuits comprise the same analog-to-digital converter.
8. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 4, wherein each of the first, second, and third fault detection circuits comprises a comparator.
9. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 8, wherein each of the first and second fault detection circuits comprises the same comparator.
10. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first, second and third calculation circuits, and the first, second and third fault circuits are analog circuits.
11. The fault detection circuit as claimed in claim 1, wherein N=4, the first set of level-setting capacitors comprises a first capacitor and a third capacitor, and the second set of level-setting capacitors comprises a second capacitor.
12. A method for programming a fault detection circuit to detect a fault in a N-to-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter having an operating cycle and having at least (N−1) level-setting capacitors, an input terminal for receiving an input voltage, a ground terminal, and a switching node connected to an inductor; the method comprising configuring the fault detection circuit for: measuring a voltage at the switching node in first and second states in which first and second sets of level-setting capacitors are being charged and discharged, and discharged and charged, respectively; calculating a first error voltage, using a first calculation circuit, as a difference of the voltage at the switching node in the first state in an operating cycle and a next subsequent operating cycle; calculating a second error voltage, using a second calculation circuit, as a difference of the voltage at the switching node in the second state in an operating cycle and a next subsequent operating cycle; comparing the sum of the voltages, using a third calculation circuit, at the switching node in first and second states with 2/N times the input voltage, to determine a third error voltage; detecting a fault in response to either an absolute value of the third error voltage exceeding a first trip voltage level, or an absolute value of either the first or second error voltages exceeding a second trip voltage level.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein in the first state a first set of capacitors is charged and a second set of capacitors is discharged such that in normal operation the switching node is 1/N times the voltage of the input terminal; wherein in the second state the first set of capacitors is discharged and the second set of capacitors is charged such that in normal operation the switching node is quarter 1/N times the voltage of the input terminal, and in the third state the switching node is short-circuited to the ground terminal; and wherein a cycle of normal operation comprises operating successively in the first, third, second and third states.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein calculating a first absolute error voltage as an absolute difference of the voltage at the switching node in the first state in an operating cycle and a next subsequent operating cycle comprises: subtracting the respective switching node voltage in the first and second states in the (n−1)th cycle (VSW1[n−1], VSW2[n−1]) to determine a first and a second absolute errors (Vsc1,err, VSW2,ERR), according to:
VSW1,ERR=|VSW1[n]−VSW1[n−1]|, and
VSW2,ERR=|VSW2[n]−VSW2[n−1]|.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein comparing the sum of the voltages at the switching node in first and second states with 2/N times the input voltage, to determine a third absolute error voltage comprises: summing the switching node voltage in the first and second states in the (n)th cycle to determine a sum value (Vsum[n]), according to
(V SUM[n]=VSW1[n]+VSW2[n]), and subtracting 2/N times the input voltage to determine a third absolute error (VSUM,ERR) according to:
V SUM,ERR=|V SUM[n]−VIN/2.
16. The method of claim 12, wherein N=4, the first set of level-setting capacitors comprises a first capacitor and a third capacitor, and the second set of level-setting capacitors comprises a second capacitor.
17. An N-to-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter having at least (N−1) level-setting capacitors, an input terminal for receiving an input voltage, a ground terminal, and a switching node connected to an inductor, and operational according to an operating cycle comprising first, second and third states; and fault detection circuit comprising: a first measuring circuit configured to measure a first voltage, VSW1, at the switching node in the first state in which first and second sets of the level-setting capacitors are being charged and discharged; a first calculation circuit configured to calculate a first error voltage as a difference of the first voltage in one operating cycle (VSW1[n−1]) and in a next subsequent operating cycle (VSW1 [n]); a first fault circuit configured to provide a first fault output indicative of a fault in response to an absolute value of the first error voltage exceeding a short-circuit-trip level; a second measuring circuit configured to measure a second voltage, VSW2, at the switching node in the second state in which the first and second sets of the level-setting capacitors are being respectively discharged and charged; a second calculation circuit configured to calculate a second error voltage as a difference of the second voltage in one operating cycle (VSW2[n−1] and in a next subsequent operating cycle (VSW2[n]); and a second fault circuit configured to provide a second fault output indicative of a fault in response to an absolute value of the second error voltage exceeding the short-circuit-trip level.
18. The N-to-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter of claim 17, wherein the fault detection circuit further comprises: a third measuring circuit configured to measure the input voltage; a third calculation circuit configured to calculate a third error voltage as the value of: the sum of the first and the second voltage in one operating cycle minus 2/N times the input voltage; and a third fault detection circuit configured to provide a third fault output indicative of a fault in response to an absolute value of the second error voltage exceeding an open-circuit-trip level.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1) Embodiments will be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13) It should be noted that the Figures are diagrammatic and not drawn to scale. Relative dimensions and proportions of parts of these Figures have been shown exaggerated or reduced in size, for the sake of clarity and convenience in the drawings. The same reference signs are generally used to refer to corresponding or similar features in modified and different embodiments.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
(14)
(15) The 4-to-1 Dickson typology hybrid DC-DC power converter illustrated in
(16) The 4-to-1 Dickson topology shown in
(17) The converter 100 shown in
(18) Six of the switches, S.sub.1, S.sub.4, S.sub.5, . . . S.sub.8 are arranged in series such that if all the switches were closed, the input voltage would be shorted. Counting from the ground up, a first capacitor C.sub.1 is connected in parallel with the second and third of the series-connected switches (S.sub.4 and S.sub.5). That is to say it is connected between a node 160 joining the first and second of the series connected switches S.sub.1 and S.sub.4 and a node 162 between the third and fourth switches S.sub.5 and S.sub.6. As will be discussed in more detail below, this capacitor charges to one quarter of the input voltage V.sub.IN.
(19) The remaining two switches, S.sub.2 and S.sub.3 are connected in series with each other and in parallel with the first two switches (S1 and S4) of the series connected switches, again counting from the ground up. A second capacitor C2 is connected between the node 164 between the remaining two switches S2 and S3, and a node 166 between the fourth and fifth of the series connected switches S.sub.6 and S.sub.7. This capacitor charges to one half of the input voltage V.sub.IN.
(20) Finally, a third capacitor is connected between the node 160 between the first and second switches of the series connected switches, and a node 168 between the fifth and sixth of the series connected switches S.sub.7 and S.sub.8. This capacitor charges to three-quarters of the input voltage V.sub.IN.
(21) In order to understand the charging of the capacitors, and the resulting voltage at the switching voltage V.sub.SW, the operating cycle of the converter will now be described. In particular, the operating cycle has first, second and third states. These are depicted in
(22) In the first state (also referred to as “state I”), the switches S.sub.2, S.sub.4, S.sub.6 and S.sub.8 are closed, whereas the switches S.sub.1, S.sub.3, S.sub.5, and S.sub.7 are open, as shown in
(23) In the second state (also referred to as “state II”), the switches S.sub.1, S.sub.3, S.sub.5 and S.sub.7 are closed, whereas the switches S.sub.2, S.sub.4, S.sub.6, and S.sub.8 are open, as shown in
(24) In the third state (also referred to as “state 0”), switches S.sub.1, S.sub.2, S.sub.3 and S.sub.4 are closed, whereas switches S.sub.5, S.sub.6, S.sub.7 and S.sub.8 are open. In consequence the switching node is short-circuited to ground. Thus, V.sub.SW=0V.
(25) The Open/Closed status of each of the eight switches (either open—O, or closed—C) for each of the three operating states, state II, state II and state 0 of the switching cycle are listed in
(26) During a complete switching period (cycle), the operation transitions through State I.fwdarw.State 0.fwdarw.State II.fwdarw.State 0. That is to say, the switching period consists of operation in a sequence of the first, third, second and third state. This is illustrated in
(27) This results in a square waveform of V.sub.SW at having a period 1/(2f.sub.SW) 325 of twice the cycling frequency with voltage levels equal to V.sub.IN/4 and 0. Because the voltage swing at the switching node is reduced compared to a regular inductive power converter, the duty cycle is not as extremely low, which makes this topology particularly suited for high-voltage-ratio down conversion.
(28) Since the voltage V.sub.SW at the switching node derives from a different capacitor and switch arrangement in the first state relative to the second state, these voltages are shown separately for the first state V.sub.SW1 and the second state V.sub.SW2, at 330 and 340 for completeness.
(29) Finally,
(30)
(31) Towards the left-hand side of the figure is illustrated normal operation. At a moment 405, shown by the dashed line in
(32) To detect such an SCF according to one or more embodiments, the following methodology is used:
(33) First, the switching node voltage V.sub.SW is sampled at every switching period during the first and the second states—that is to say State I (Vsw1[n]) and State II (Vsw2[n]). In
(34) Second, these 2 values are compared with their corresponding values in the previous sampling period (V.sub.SW1[n−1] and V.sub.SW2[n−1]). In normal operation, these voltages are nearly constant as illustrated by the correspondence of the voltage measured at the first state V.sub.SW1 at 431 and 432. However, in the case that a fault develops, these voltages will change, as illustrated by the voltage during the second state during normal operation shown at 441 compared with the voltage after the development of the SCF, at 442.
(35) The absolute value of the difference between 2 consecutive samples of the same State is computed as V.sub.SW1,ERR or V.sub.SW2,ERR:
(36) That is to say,
V.sub.SW1,ERR=|V.sub.SW1[n]−V.sub.SW1[n−1]|, and
V.sub.SW2,ERR=|V.sub.SW2[n]−V.sub.SW2[n−1]|.
(37) During normal operation this error value is low, being at or close to 0.
(38) Third, if the difference is larger than a particular absolute error magnitude V.sub.TRIP,SCF, a fault is signalled, since when a fault occurs, this error value becomes non-zero.
(39) It will be appreciated that as an alternative to determining the absolute value of the difference between 2 consecutive samples of the same State, a simple difference may be determined, and this compared with a threshold or trigger level.
(40) In the example shown in
(41) As can be seen in
(42)
(43) Consider again that, in normal operation, the sum of the voltages levels of the switching nodes during state I and state II (respectively V.sub.IN/4 and V.sub.IN/4) is equal to the voltage across the capacitor C2 (V.sub.IN/2). Furthermore, the voltage across the capacitor C2 is always equal, or very close, to V.sub.IN/2 even during transients—such as when the converter adapts to a change in the load—provided that the transients are not faster than the switching frequency of the converter. In normal operation it would not be expected that transients would be faster than the switching frequency of the converter. This feature may be used to manipulate the values measured at the switching node to detect OCF events in addition to or as an alternative to the above-mentioned detection of SCF events:
(44) In essence, an OCF in any of the power switches or floating—that is to say, level-setting—capacitors may be detected by:
(45) First, the switching node voltage V.sub.SW is sampled at every switching period during State I (V.sub.SW1[n]) and State II (V.sub.SW2[n]), as described above.
(46) Second, these two values are added at every sampling period into a V.sub.SUM[n] value=(V.sub.SUM[n]=V.sub.SW11[n]+V.sub.SW22[n]).
(47) Third, the absolute value of the difference between Vsum[n] and half of the input voltage (V.sub.IN) is calculated, that is to say:
V.sub.SUM,ERR=|V.sub.SUM[n]−V.sub.IN/2|.
(48) And finally if this difference is larger than a particular error magnitude V.sub.TRIP,OCF a fault may be signalled.
(49) As discussed above with respect to the threshold for the short-circuit faults, the magnitude of the threshold V.sub.TRIP,OCF may be optimally selected based on the design parameters of the power converter. This may enable adequately fast detection of a fault, whilst still providing adequate robustness towards transient variations of the operating modes which may be expected due to normal operation, for instance due to variation of the load, as mentioned above. It should be noted that typically severity of open-circuit faults is lower than that of short-circuit faults, and thus a slower reaction in general may be acceptable for normal applications.
(50) Again, it will be appreciated that as an alternative to determining the absolute value of the difference between Vsum[n] and half of the input voltage, a simple difference may be determined, and this compared with a threshold or trigger level.
(51) Turning to the detail of
(52) A conceptual circuit arrangement 600 to carry out the methods just described for detection of one or both of SCFs and OCFs is shown in
(53) ADC 611 is triggered to sample the voltage at the switching node V.sub.SW, again once every switching cycle—in this instance this is determined by SW.sub.8 being closed so the converter is in state II, although in other embodiments different switches (for instance, SW.sub.2, SW.sub.4 or SW.sub.6) may be used as the trigger event.
(54) Similarly, ADC 621 is triggered to sample the voltage at the switching node V.sub.SW, again once every switching cycle—in this instance this is determined by SW7 being closed so the converter is in state I, although in other embodiments different switches (for instance, SW.sub.1, SW.sub.3 or SW.sub.5) may be used as the trigger event.
(55) Each of these values, for the nth switching cycle (that is to say, V.sub.SW1[n] and V.sub.SW2[n]) is used both in the determination of SCF and OCF.
(56) For the determination of a SCF, the value V.sub.SW1[n] is stored in memory element 612, which may be, for instance, a flipflop, and is subtracted from the previous value V.sub.SW1[n−1] at logic 613. The absolute value of the signal is determined, shown as at 614, to determine the error signal V.sub.SW1,ERR. This is compared with the threshold level V.sub.TRIP,SCF in comparator 615, which may be implemented, as shown, as a Schmitt trigger, to result in a first short-circuit fault detection signal FD.sub.SCF,OUT. Correspondingly, the value V.sub.SW2[n] is stored in memory element 622, and is subtracted from the previous value V.sub.SW2[n−1] at logic 623. The absolute value of the signal is determined, shown as at 624, to determine the error signal V.sub.SW1,ERR. This is compared with the threshold level or short-circuit-trip level, V.sub.TRIP,SCF at comparator 625, which may, as shown, be implemented as a Schmitt trigger to result in a second short-circuit fault detection signal FD.sub.SCF,OUT.
(57) For the determination of an OCF, the values V.sub.SW1[n] and V.sub.SW2[n] are summed, as shown in 631 and the value V.sub.IN/2 is subtracted as shown at 632. The absolute value is determined at 633, to provide the signal V.sub.SUM,ERR. This is compared with the threshold level, or open-circuit-trip level, V.sub.TRIP,OCF at comparator 635, which may as shown be implemented as a Schmitt trigger to result in an open-circuit fault detection signal FD.sub.OCF,OUT.
(58) Finally, the two short-circuit detection fault detection signals FD.sub.SCF,OUT and the open-circuit fault detection signal FD.sub.OCF,OUT are combined in logic 640 to provide a generic fault detection signal FD.
(59) It will be appreciated, that the above conceptual circuit may be implemented in many different ways. In particular, although separate ADCs 601, 611 and 621 have been shown, the same ADC may be utilised to sample the switching voltage V.sub.SW at different times to put into effect requirements of 611 and 621, and the same ADC may further be used to measure the voltage V.sub.IN at a separate moment in the switching cycle. Thus three ADCs may not be required; either one or two may be used instead.
(60) Similarly, three comparators 615, 625 and 635 are shown but the skilled person will appreciate that the same circuit elements or digital processing block may be used to carry out two or more of these functions.
(61) Furthermore, in
(62) The description above has focused on a 4-to-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter. However, as already mentioned, the present disclosure extends to Dickson topology converters with other step-down ratios, in general N-to-1.
(63)
(64) In the 6-to-1 topology shown, N is equal to 6; there are a total of 10 switches, SW.sub.1, SW.sub.2 . . . SW.sub.10—that is to say, 4+N. Further, there are 5 floating, or level-setting, capacitors, C.sub.1, C.sub.2 . . . C.sub.5. That is to say there are (N−1) capacitors. The capacitors form a sort of modified ladder, in which one terminal of each of the successive capacitors is connected to a node at a separate “rung” of the ladder, 762, 764 . . . 770 respectively—(the reader may find it instructive to compare these with nodes 162, 166 and 168 of the 4-to-1 convertor shown in
(65) Each of the further node and the yet further node can be switched between the switching node V.sub.SW 140 and ground. In the first state of the operating cycle, State I, the odd capacitors are charged (by switching node 760 to ground), whilst of the even capacitors are discharged (node 764 is switched to the switching node V.sub.SW 140). Conversely, in the first state of the operating cycle, State II, the odd capacitors are discharged (by switching node 760 to the switching node V.sub.SW 140), whilst of the even capacitors are charged (node 764 is switched to ground). In the third state, state, the switching node is grounded (by closing at least one of the pairs of switches SW.sub.4 and SW.sub.1, and SW.sub.3 and SW.sub.2). Thus in this case, the odd capacitors C.sub.1, C.sub.3 and C.sub.5 form a first set of capacitors which are charged during the first state, State I, and discharged during the second state, State II. The even capacitors C.sub.2, and C.sub.4 form a second set of capacitors which are discharged during the first state, State I, and charged during the second state, State II.
(66) In the figure, it is indicated for each of the switches, those which are closed in State I and State II, by the addition of a second subscript: that is to say the even switches SW.sub.6, SW.sub.8 and SW.sub.10 are closed in State I, indicated by SW.sub.6 (1), SW.sub.8 (1) and SW.sub.10 (1), and the odd switches SW.sub.5, SW.sub.7 and SW.sub.9 are closed in State II, indicated by SW.sub.5 (2), SW.sub.7 (2) and SW.sub.9 (2). Similarly, the open/closed state of the four switches which control the nodes 760 and 764 are shown (SW.sub.1 (2), SW.sub.2 (1), SW.sub.3 (2) and SW.sub.4 (1).
(67) Short-circuit faults are detected as described above for the 4-to-1 case; open circuit faults are detected by comparing the sum of the voltages V.sub.SW at the switching node during the first and second state, with 2V.sub.IN/6, that is to say, V.sub.IN/3. In other words, the average voltage at switching node 140 during these two states, is compared with the expected step-down ratio V.sub.IN/6.
(68)
(69) Once again, short-circuit faults are detected as described above for the 4-to-1 case; open circuit faults are detected by comparing the sum of the voltages V.sub.SW at the switching node during the first and second state, with 2V.sub.IN/7. In other words, the average voltage at switching node 140 during these two states is compared with the expected step-down ratio V.sub.IN/7.
(70) The skilled person will immediately appreciate that for the general case, the schematics circuit shown in
(71) From reading the present disclosure, other variations and modifications will be apparent to the skilled person. Such variations and modifications may involve equivalent and other features which are already known in the art of hybrid power converters, and which may be used instead of, or in addition to, features already described herein.
(72) Although the appended claims are directed to particular combinations of features, it should be understood that the scope of the disclosure of the present invention also includes any novel feature or any novel combination of features disclosed herein either explicitly or implicitly or any generalisation thereof, whether or not it relates to the same invention as presently claimed in any claim and whether or not it mitigates any or all of the same technical problems as does the present invention.
(73) Features which are described in the context of separate embodiments may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination. The applicant hereby gives notice that new claims may be formulated to such features and/or combinations of such features during the prosecution of the present application or of any further application derived therefrom.
(74) For the sake of completeness it is also stated that the term “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, the term “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality, a single processor or other unit may fulfil the functions of several means recited in the claims and reference signs in the claims shall not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims.
LIST OF REFERENCE SIGNS
(75) 100 4-to-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter 110 switched inductor, L 120 output voltage, V.sub.OUT 130 output capacitor, C.sub.OUT 140 switching node 150 input voltage V.sub.IN 160 node between first (S.sub.1) and second (S.sub.4) series connected switches 162 node between third (S.sub.5) and fourth (S.sub.6) series connected switches 164 node between remaining switches (S.sub.2 and S.sub.3) 166 node between fourth (S.sub.6) and fifth (S.sub.7) series connected switches 168 node between fifth (S.sub.7) and sixth (S.sub.8) series connected switches 310 inductor current, IL 320 switching node voltage V.sub.SW 330 switching node voltage in state I, V.sub.SW1 340 switching node voltage in state II, V.sub.SW2 350 voltage across C.sub.1 352 voltage across C.sub.2 354 voltage across C.sub.3 405 moment of simulated fault 410 inductor current, IL 420 switching node voltage V.sub.SW 430 switching node voltage in state I, V.sub.SW1 440 switching node voltage in state II, V.sub.SW2 450 voltage across C.sub.1 452 voltage across C.sub.2 454 voltage across C.sub.3 460 error signal V.sub.SW1,SCF 461 error signal V.sub.SW1,SCF change moment 470 error signal V.sub.SW2,SCF 471 error signal V.sub.SW2,SCF change moment 481 short-circuit-trip positive level V.sub.TRIP,OCF 482 short-circuit-trip negative level V.sub.TRIP,SCF 560 error signal V.sub.SW1,OCF 581 open-circuit-trip positive level V.sub.TRIP,OCF 582 open-circuit-trip negative level V.sub.TRIP,OCF 600 conceptual fault-detection circuit 601 ADC 602 Divide-by-2 logic 611 ADC 612 memory element 613 difference logic 614 absolute value logic 615 comparator 621 ADC 622 memory element 623 difference logic 624 absolute value logic 625 comparator 631 summing logic 632 difference logic 633 absolute-value logic 635 comparator 640 OR LOGIC 700 6-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter 705 Load 760, 764 charge/discharge nodes 762, 766 . . . 770 ladder nodes 800 7-1 Dickson topology hybrid DC-DC power converter