METHOD FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATED TO THE COMPACTION STATE OF A SOIL WHEN PERFORMING A COMPACTION OPERATION WITH A SOIL COMPACTOR

Abstract

A method for providing information related to the compaction state of a soil when performing a compaction operation with a soil compactor comprises the operations: a) detecting a vertical acceleration and a horizontal acceleration of a vibratory roller when moving a soil compactor over a soil to be compacted, b) determining a measurement relationship between a ground contact force (F.sub.b) and a deflection (s.sub.w) of the vibratory roller for one vibration cycle using the vertical acceleration and horizontal acceleration detected in operation a), c) determining a simulation relationship (Z.sub.S) between the ground contact force (F.sub.b) and the deflection (s.sub.w) for one vibration cycle using a ground model taking into account at least one simulation parameter, d) comparing the simulation relationship (Z.sub.S) to the measurement relationship, e) determining that a default value of the at least one simulation parameter taken into account in the ground model substantially represents a corresponding soil parameter of the soil to be compacted when the simulation relationship (Z.sub.S) substantially corresponds to the measurement relationship.

Claims

1. A method for providing information related to the compaction state of a soil when carrying out a compaction process with a soil compactor (10), wherein the soil compactor (10) comprises at least one vibratory roller (24) with an imbalance arrangement (28) rotating about a roller rotation axis (W) of the at least one vibratory roller (24), wherein in association with the at least one vibratory roller (24) an acceleration detection arrangement (30, 32) is provided for detecting a vertical acceleration (a.sub.z) of the vibratory roller (24) substantially orthogonal to the soil (12) to be compacted and a horizontal acceleration (a.sub.x) of the at least one vibratory roller (24) substantially parallel to the soil (12) to be compacted, comprising the operations: a) detecting the vertical acceleration (a.sub.z) and the horizontal acceleration (a.sub.z) of the at least one vibratory roller (24) when the soil compactor (10) moves over the soil (12) to be compacted, b) determining a measurement relationship (Z.sub.M) between a ground contact force (F.sub.b) and a deflection (s.sub.w) of the vibratory roller (24) for at least one vibration cycle using the vertical acceleration (a.sub.z) and horizontal acceleration detected in operation a), c) determining a simulation relationship (Z.sub.S) between the ground contact force (F.sub.b) and the deflection (s.sub.w) for at least one vibration cycle using a ground model taking into account at least one simulation parameter, d) comparing the simulation relationship (Z.sub.S) determined in operation c) for at least one vibration cycle to the measurement relationship (Z.sub.M) determined in operation b) for at least one vibration cycle, e) determining that a default value of the at least one simulation parameter taken into account in the ground model substantially represents a corresponding soil parameter of the soil (12) to be compacted, if the comparison performed at operation d) shows that the simulation relationship (Z.sub.S) determined for at least one vibration cycle substantially corresponds to the measurement relationship (Z.sub.M) determined for at least one vibration cycle.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that operations b) and c) take into account the deflection in a working direction (A) of the vibratory roller (24) corresponding substantially to a direction of the maximum ground contact force (F.sub.bmax).

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that operation c) comprises an operation c1) for determining a contact perimeter length (2b) of the vibratory roller (24) in the course of a vibration cycle, and that the contact perimeter length (2b) forms a simulation parameter of the ground model.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, in operation c1), the contact perimeter length (2b) is determined based on the vertical acceleration (a.sub.z) and horizontal acceleration (a.sub.x) determined in operation a) and based on a movement speed of the soil compactor (10) in a movement direction (B) of the soil compactor (10).

5. The method according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that, in operation c1), the contact perimeter length (2b) is determined with a front perimeter length section (b.sub.v) preceding a contact center in a movement direction (B) of the soil compactor (10) and a rear perimeter length section (b.sub.h) trailing the contact center in the movement direction (B) of the soil compactor (10), and in that an asymmetry parameter representing the condition of the soil (12) is formed based on a length of the front perimeter length section (b.sub.v) and a length of the rear perimeter length section (b.sub.h).

6. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that a soil elasticity modulus (E.sub.geo) forms a simulation parameter of the ground model.

7. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the ground model takes into account a ground deformation behavior represented at least by a spring force component (F.sub.b,k) and a damper force component (F.sub.b,c), and in that operation c) comprises an operation c2) for determining the spring force component (F.sub.b,k) and an operation c3) for determining the damper force component (F.sub.b,c).

8. The method according to claim 3 and claim 6 and claim 7, characterized in that the spring force component (F.sub.b,k) is determined as a function of the soil elasticity modulus (E.sub.geo) and the contact perimeter length (2b) in operation c2), or/and in that the damper force component (F.sub.b,c) is determined as a function of the soil elasticity modulus (E.sub.geo) and the contact perimeter length (2b) in operation c3).

9. The method according to claim 7 or claim 8, characterized in that, in operation c2), the spring force component (F.sub.b,k) is determined for one vibration cycle with a first spring force component portion (F.sub.1) for a phase with increasing penetration depth of the vibratory roller (24) into the ground and with a second spring force component portion (F.sub.2) for a phase with decreasing penetration depth of the vibratory roller (24).

10. The method according to claim 9, characterized in that, in operation c2), the second spring force component portion (F.sub.2) is determined taking into account a relief stiffness factor in such a way that in a transition from the phase of decreasing penetration depth of the vibratory roller (24) to an out-of-contact phase, the spring force component (F.sub.b,k) and the damper force component (F.sub.b,c) compensate each other substantially completely, wherein in the out-of-contact phase the at least one vibratory roller (24) is substantially not in contact with the soil (12) to be compacted, wherein the relief stiffness factor can form a stiffness parameter representing the condition of the soil.

11. The method according to claim 10, characterized in that operation c) comprises an operation c4) for determining the ground contact force (F.sub.b) for a vibration cycle based on the spring force component (F.sub.b,k) determined in operation c2) and the damper force component (F.sub.b,c) determined in operation c3).

12. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that, if detected during operation e) that the deviation of the simulation relationship (Z.sub.S) from the measurement relationship (Z.sub.M) does not fall below a predetermined deviation threshold, the operations c) to e) are repeated while changing at least one simulation parameter when operation c) is carried out until the deviation of the simulation relationship (Z.sub.S) from the measurement relationship (Z.sub.M) falls below the predetermined deviation threshold.

13. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that a correlation factor is determined between the simulation parameter determined in operation e) as substantially representing the corresponding soil parameter and a measured value of the soil parameter of the compacted soil (12), or in that the simulation parameter determined in operation e) as substantially representing the corresponding soil parameter is linked to a correlation factor to obtain an actual value of a soil parameter.

14. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that operations a) to e) are repeatedly carried out during the movement of the soil compactor (10) when carrying out a compaction operation.

15. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that, during a compaction process, a data set is generated with a plurality of positions on the soil (12) to be compacted and the value determined in association therewith of the at least one simulation parameter determined when carrying out operations a) to e) as substantially representing a soil parameter.

Description

[0031] The present invention is described below with reference to the accompanying figures. Wherein:

[0032] FIG. 1 shows a side view of a soil compactor in simplified form;

[0033] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the accelerations occurring in the course of a vibration cycle on a vibratory roller of the soil compactor of FIG. 1 orthogonal to a surface of a soil to be compacted and parallel to this surface;

[0034] FIG. 3 is a working diagram derived from the diagram in FIG. 2, showing the ground contact force plotted over a vibration path of the vibratory roller in a working direction;

[0035] FIG. 4 shows the movement of the vibratory roller of the soil compactor of FIG. 1 over multiple vibration cycles;

[0036] FIG. 5 shows a physical substitute model of a soil to be compacted;

[0037] FIG. 6 shows a representation corresponding to FIG. 3 of a simulation relationship between the ground contact force and the vibration path of the vibratory roller in the working direction.

[0038] In FIG. 1, a soil compactor is generally designated 10. The soil compactor 10 moving in a direction of movement B on a soil 12 to be compacted is constructed with a rear carriage 14 and a front carriage 16 pivotally supported thereon. A drive unit and drive wheels 18 driven by the same for moving the soil compactor 10 in the direction of movement B or in the opposite direction are provided on the rear carriage 14. Furthermore, an operator's station 20 is provided on the rear carriage 14 for an operator operating the soil compactor 10. From the operator's station, the operator can operate the soil compactor 10 to perform a compaction operation, and information relevant to the compaction operation can be displayed to the operator on a display unit 22.

[0039] A compactor roller or vibratory roller 24 is supported on the front carriage 16 as a compaction tool so that it can rotate about a roller rotation axis W that is orthogonal to the drawing plane of FIG. 1. In the two axial end regions of the compactor roller 24 or of a shell 26 thereof, the latter is suspended via elastic suspension arrangements on the front carriage 16 in such a way that the vibratory roller 24 can be deflected transversely to the roller rotation axis W with respect to the front carriage 16. A drive motor may be associated with the compactor roller 24 for driving the same to rotate about the roller rotation axis W.

[0040] Such a deflection of the vibratory roller 24 can be caused by an imbalance arrangement 28 arranged inside the same with at least one unbalanced mass which can be driven to rotate about the roller rotation axis W and which has a center of mass eccentric to the roller rotation axis W. The rotation of the imbalance arrangement 28 about the roller rotation axis W and the centrifugal forces that occur and are transmitted to the vibratory roller 24 and act orthogonally to the roller rotation axis W generate a periodic deflection of the vibratory roller 24 with respect to the front carriage 16. This deflection or the forces acting on the vibratory roller 24 during rotation of the imbalance arrangement 28 can be detected by acceleration sensors 30, 32 associated with the vibratory roller 24. In this context, the acceleration sensor 30 may be configured or arranged to detect a vertical acceleration a.sub.z, i.e., an acceleration that is directed substantially orthogonally to the surface of the soil 12 to be compacted. The acceleration sensor 32 may be configured or arranged to detect a translational horizontal acceleration a.sub.x, which is an acceleration directed substantially parallel to the surface of the soil 12 to be compacted. For example, the two acceleration sensors 30, 32 may be provided on a bearing shell of a bearing rotatably supporting the vibratory roller 24 in one of its axial end portions with respect to the front carriage 16. It should be noted that, for example, such a pair of acceleration sensors 30, 32 may also be provided at both axial end regions of the vibratory roller 24 to be able to detect the accelerations or forces acting on the vibratory roller 24 in both axial end regions.

[0041] FIG. 2 illustrates the vertical acceleration a.sub.z and horizontal acceleration a.sub.x occurring through the acceleration sensors 30, 32 in the course of a vibration cycle, for example a complete revolution of the imbalance arrangement 28. In this case, the diagram of FIG. 2 shows an operating condition in which, due to the forces generated by the imbalance arrangement 28, the vibratory roller 24 periodically lifts temporarily from the soil 12 to be compacted during each vibration cycle and subsequently strikes the soil again, penetrating the soil 12 to be compacted.

[0042] At time t.sub.1, the vibratory roller 24 lifts off the soil 12 to be compacted, such that the force acting on the vibratory roller 24 is substantially determined from the product of the mass of the vibratory roller 24 and the acceleration occurring at each time, as well as from the force from the vibratory excitation and from the static axle load. At time t.sub.2, the vibratory roller 24 again comes into contact with the soil 12 to be compacted and, in the course of this movement, increasingly penetrates the soil 12, compacting it in the process. In this phase, in which the vibratory roller 24 is in contact with the soil 12, i.e. between the times t.sub.2 and t.sub.1, a ground contact force F.sub.b acts between the ground 12 and the vibratory roller 24, which is substantially also determined by the reaction generated by the soil 12 to the load applied by the vibratory roller 24. As the vibratory roller 24 penetrates the soil 12 to be compacted, the ground contact force F.sub.b increases until the ground contact force F.sub.b reaches its maximum value F.sub.bmax at a time t.sub.3. It can be clearly seen in FIG. 2 that, in the state of maximum ground contact force F.sub.bmax, the force is not oriented exactly orthogonal to the soil 12, but is slightly inclined forward, which is substantially due to the fact that the soil compactor 10 moves forward in the direction of movement B during such a vibration cycle, and therefore the vibratory roller 24 penetrates the soil 12 at an oblique forward angle as it moves downward toward the soil 12. The direction corresponding substantially to the orientation of the maximum ground contact force F.sub.b is considered the working direction A. A direction orthogonal to it is considered as a normal direction N to the working direction A.

[0043] FIG. 2 further shows that, over one vibration cycle, the curve representing the development of the accelerations is shifted downward by a constant offset V representing this load factor due to the load of the front carriage 16 and also of the rear carriage 14 resting on the vibratory roller 24, wherein the load component acting constantly orthogonally to the surface of the soil 12 is also taken into account here.

[0044] A vibration path representing the deflection s.sub.w of the vibratory roller 24 in the working direction A can be determined for each vibration cycle by double integration of the accelerations shown in the diagram of FIG. 2 for a vibration cycle or recorded by measurement. A measurement relationship Z.sub.M between the ground contact force F.sub.b and the deflection s.sub.w can be determined as shown in FIG. 3 from this deflection s.sub.w of the vibratory roller 24, which can be determined for each point in time of a vibration cycle, and the ground contact force F.sub.b, which is also known for each point in time of the vibration cycle. This measurement relationship Z.sub.M represents a working diagram, wherein the area enclosed by the curve which represents the measurement relationship Z.sub.M represents the compaction work performed.

[0045] In the diagram of FIG. 3, the time t.sub.1 again represents the time at which the vibratory roller 24 loses contact with the soil 12 and lifts off from it. At time t.sub.2, the vibratory roller 24 comes back into contact with the soil 12. In the course of the then occurring penetration movement, the ground contact force F.sub.b increases until it reaches its maximum F.sub.bmax at time t.sub.3. At time t.sub.4, the state of maximum penetration into the soil 12 is reached and a reversal of the direction of movement occurs until the vibratory roller 24 lifts off the soil 12 again at time t.sub.1. Thus, the vibratory roller 24 performs a movement having an amplitude A.sub.s with respect to a center of deflection s.sub.w in the working direction A in one vibration cycle.

[0046] The relationship shown in FIG. 3 can be analyzed to obtain information about the condition of the soil 12. For example, an approximate correlation with the stiffness or load stiffness of the soil and thus also the degree of compaction achieved can be established from the slope of the approximately linear course of the measurement relationship Z.sub.M between the times t.sub.2 and t.sub.3. As indicated above, the area enclosed by the measuring relationship Z.sub.M can be used to infer the compaction work and thus also the energy introduced into the soil 12. However, such analyses of a measurement relationship Z.sub.M, as shown in FIG. 3, allow only a comparatively limited provision of information about the condition of the soil in the context of an area-wide dynamic compaction control, especially since a change in process parameters, such as the travel speed of the soil compactor 12, also leads to a change in this relationship and thus to different results of analysis.

[0047] The present invention aims at allowing a more comprehensive and precise statement about the condition of the soil 12 by taking into account such a measurement relationship Z.sub.M as shown for a vibration cycle in FIG. 3. The measures provided for this purpose in accordance with the invention are explained below.

[0048] FIG. 4 shows the movement of the vibratory roller 24 during multiple successive vibration cycles. It should be noted that such vibration cycles are comparatively short-lived events compared to the rolling motion of the vibratory roller 24. The imbalance arrangement 28 rotates at a speed of several tens of revolutions per second, whereas a complete revolution of the vibratory roller 24 generally takes several seconds as the soil compactor 10 moves in the direction of movement B. This means that during one complete revolution of the vibratory roller 24, the number of vibratory cycles may be in the range of 100 or more. This in turn means that the rolling motion or rotation of the vibratory roller 24 that occurs during each vibration cycle can be neglected.

[0049] In FIG. 4, the curve K shows the movement of the center point of the vibratory roller 24, i.e. the roller rotation axis W, in the course of successive vibration cycles in the horizontal direction x and the vertical direction z. This movement is substantially composed of the periodic up-down or forward-backward movement of the vibratory roller 24 caused by the operation of the imbalance arrangement 28 and the movement of the soil compactor 10, and thus also of the vibratory roller 24, in the direction of movement B, which substantially corresponds to an orbital movement of the roller rotation axis W. A movement pattern occurring in such a periodical lifting movement of the vibratory roller 24 can be clearly seen, in which pattern the vibratory roller 24 lifts off the soil 12 more strongly in every second vibration cycle than in a respective intermediate vibration cycle. Such a pattern of movement will occur primarily when a comparatively high degree of compaction of the soil 12 has been achieved. The vibratory roller 24 this can have the same course of movement in each period of the movement, i.e. also lift off from the soil 12 to substantially the same extent, in the case of comparatively little compacted soil 12. The course of the curve K can be determined mathematically from the accelerations a.sub.z and a.sub.x detected by the acceleration sensors 30, 32 and the speed at which the soil compactor 10 moves in the direction of movement B, which is also detected by measurement, for example. While the movement of the vibratory roller 24 caused by the movement of the imbalance arrangement 28 can be derived by double integration of the curve resulting from the measured accelerations, the movement in the direction of movement B superimposed on this movement can be determined by multiplying the known or detected speed of the soil compactor 10 by time, such that the location represented by the curve K and the direction of movement of the center of the compactor roller 24 are known for each point in time.

[0050] With the curve K determined taking into account the accelerations a.sub.z and a.sub.x and the speed of movement of the soil compactor 10 in the direction of movement B, or the movement of the vibratory roller 24 represented by this curve K during the successive vibration cycles, it becomes possible to calculate a contact perimeter length of the vibratory roller 24, represented in FIG. 4 by the variable 2b, for each vibration cycle in the course of a respective vibration cycle, i.e. during the penetration and the return movement of the vibratory roller 24 into or from the soil 10, taking into account the geometry of the soil 12 to be compacted.

[0051] FIG. 4 shows, based on the profile of the surface of the soil 12 indicated by a dashed line shown in the last vibration cycle, that this profile is substantially defined by a substantially straight section of the soil 12 not yet impacted by the vibratory roller 24 before the impact of the vibratory roller 24 on the soil 12 in the last vibration cycle shown, visible on the right, and a section curved like a segment of a circle, which results from the last complete vibration cycle and the deformation of the soil 12 that occurs in the process. The line of contact S of these two sections of the surface of the soil 10 represents the area in which, at time t.sub.2, the vibratory roller 24 comes into contact with the soil 12 in the last vibration cycle shown.

[0052] Starting from an approximately linear contact in the area S over the entire axial length of the vibratory roller 24 or the roller shell 26 thereof, the contact perimeter length 2b increases in the course of the penetration movement of the vibratory roller 24 into the soil 12, i.e. substantially between the time t.sub.2 and the time t.sub.4 at which the maximum penetration depth is reached. The product of the contact perimeter length 2b and the axial length 2a of the roller shell 26 gives the area over which the vibratory roller 24 is in contact with the soil 12 to be compacted for each point in time of the penetration movement.

[0053] This area or the contact perimeter length 2b can be determined mathematically due to the fact that the curve K indicates how the vibratory roller 24 moves and that, as shown in FIG. 4, it is basically known or can be assumed which geometry the soil 12 has in the area in which the vibratory roller 24 comes into contact therewith during a respective vibration cycle. In a simplifying assumption, it can be assumed that the vibratory roller 24 comes into contact with the soil 12 uniformly over its axial length in the course of a vibration cycle and thus penetrates it uniformly. Further, as a simplifying assumption, it can be assumed that the soil 12 substantially retains its shape in the course of a complete vibration cycle after reaching time t.sub.1 at the transition from a relief to a loss of contact in the measuring relationship Z.sub.M of FIG. 3. In the case of more complex models, it can also be taken into account metrologically or mathematically that the vibratory roller 24 wobbles, i.e. does not penetrate the soil 12 in the same way at both axial ends, which can be detected, for example, by providing respective sensors 30, 32 in association with both axial ends of the vibratory roller 24. It can then also be taken into account mathematically that the vibratory roller 24 penetrates the soil 12 to different extents over its axial length and thus different contact perimeter lengths 2b result over the length of the vibratory roller 24.

[0054] FIG. 4 shows that the contact perimeter length 2b is basically divided into two perimeter length sections b.sub.h and b.sub.v which are not symmetrical with respect to a contact center Z, that is, do not have the same length. The contact center Z is defined, for example, by the area in which a line passing through the roller rotation axis W in the vertical direction z intersects the soil 12, for example in the state of maximum penetration. This asymmetry with regard to the lengths of the two perimeter length sections b.sub.h and b.sub.v, which also results or can be derived from the calculation of the contact perimeter length 2b, provides information about the pushing effect of the vibratory roller 24 and also depends on the deformation behavior of the soil 12 and can thus be used to make a statement about the condition of the soil 12 during compaction. It should be noted that knowledge of this asymmetry can be obtained solely from measurable variables, namely the accelerations a.sub.z and a.sub.x and the speed of movement of the soil compactor in the direction of movement B, using mathematical calculation methods when taking into account the geometric conditions of the soil, without having to take into account any information that is not known with regard to the structure of the soil.

[0055] A physical model is established for the soil in the procedure according to the invention for providing information about the condition of the soil 12 to be compacted. In the Kelvin-Voigt ground model shown as an example in FIG. 5, the soil is represented by two force components. The force component F.sub.b,k corresponds to a spring force component, which is substantially represented by a spring stiffness K.sub.(b). The force component F.sub.b,c corresponds to a damper force component, which is substantially represented by a damping parameter C.sub.(b). The ground contact force F.sub.b which acts between the soil behaving according to this model and the vibratory roller 24 can thus be calculated as the sum total of the two force components F.sub.b,k and F.sub.b,c.

[0056] For the ground model shown in FIG. 5, for example, the spring stiffness K.sub.(b) and the damping parameter C.sub.(b) can be taken into account in accordance with Wolf's cone model for compressible soils using the two formulas given below:

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}{K}_{\left(b\right)}=\frac{G.Math.b}{1-v}.Math.\left[3.1.Math.{\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)}^{0.78}+1.6\right]& \left(1\right)\\ C_{\left(b\right)}=4.Math.\sqrt{2.Math.\rho .Math.G.Math.\frac{1-v}{1-2.Math.v}}.Math.a.Math.b& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

[0057] In these formulas, the variable b corresponds to half the contact perimeter length 2b, the profile of which, as explained previously with reference to FIG. 4, can be determined mathematically for each vibration cycle from the time the vibratory roller 24 impacts the soil 12 until loss of contact is reached. The variable a corresponds to half the axial length 2a of the vibratory roller 24 or roller shell 26, such that the product of half the axial length a of the vibratory roller 24 and half the contact perimeter length b, which varies in the course of a penetration movement, is substantially a quarter of the contact area with which the vibratory roller 24 is in contact with the soil 12 at any point in time in the course of one vibration cycle. The quantity ν represents Poisson's ratio of the soil and can be assumed to have a value between 0 and about ⅓, assuming that the soil to be taken into account in the model is compressible. The quantity p corresponds to the density of the structural material of the soil, which is assumed to be approximately constant.

[0058] It should be noted at this point that other or additional variables, such as the mass of the soil, may also be taken into account if other models are used.

[0059] The variable G, also commonly referred to as the shear modulus, can be determined using the following formula:

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}G=\frac{E_{\mathrm{geo}}}{2.Math.\left(1+v\right)}& \left(3\right)\end{array}$

wherein the variable E.sub.geo represents the modulus of elasticity of the soil.

[0060] Taking into account these quantities a, b, ν, ρ, E.sub.geo, the spring stiffness K.sub.(b) and the damping parameter C.sub.(b) can thus be determined using the formulas (1), (2) and (3) provided above. It can be seen in the above example of a ground model that the modulus of elasticity E.sub.geo or the shear modulus of the soil taking said variable into account is used as an essential variable characterizing the condition of the soil, in addition to the variables ρ, ν, a and b, which are assumed to be known or determined by calculation.

[0061] Using a plausible assumption for the value of the elastic modulus E.sub.geo, a simulation relationship Z.sub.S shown in FIG. 6 can be determined, which relationship is based on the ground model shown in FIG. 5 and the variables spring stiffness K.sub.(b) and damping parameter C.sub.(b), which are assumed by way of example using the above formulas (1) to (3).

[0062] The force components F.sub.b,k and F.sub.b,c are calculated for one vibration cycle using the formulas (1) and (2) for the spring stiffness K.sub.(b) and the damping parameter C.sub.(b) to determine the simulation relationship Z.sub.S shown in FIG. 6, which reproduces the relationship between the ground contact force F.sub.b and the deflection s.sub.w of the vibratory roller 24 in the working direction A, for example by taking into account the ground model shown in FIG. 5 and represented by the formulas (1) to (3). In connection with the spring force component F.sub.b,k, spring force component portions F.sub.1 and F.sub.2, each represented by a dash-dot-dash line, are determined for a phase between times t.sub.2 and t.sub.4 with increasing penetration depth and a phase between times t.sub.4 and t.sub.1 with decreasing penetration depth. This makes it possible to consider the fact that such a soil exhibits different stiffness behaviors in the loaded phase on the one hand and the relief phase on the other, which can be taken into account by introducing a relief stiffness factor for the relief phase, i.e. the phase of decreasing penetration depth between times t.sub.4 and

[0063] The spring force component portion F.sub.1 for the loaded phase, i.e. the phase of increasing penetration depth between times t.sub.2 and t.sub.4, can be calculated by multiplying the spring stiffness K.sub.(b) by the vibration path in the working direction A over this phase between times t.sub.2 and t.sub.4. FIG. 6 clearly shows that a force profile is obtained which deviates from an exactly linear path. Likewise, the curve for the phase of decreasing penetration depth can be calculated between the times t.sub.4 and t.sub.1, wherein the relief stiffness factor already mentioned is also included by multiplying the product of spring stiffness K.sub.(b) and vibration velocity in the working direction A to be integrated over this time interval by the relief stiffness factor. As a boundary condition for the relief stiffness factor, it must be assumed that at the time when the contact between the vibratory roller 24 and the soil 12 ends, i.e. at time t.sub.1, the spring force component F.sub.b,k and the damper force component F.sub.b,c compensate each other to achieve an equilibrium of forces.

[0064] The damping force component F.sub.b,c is obtained for a respective vibration cycle by integrating the product of damping parameter C.sub.(b) and vibration velocity in the working direction A, which may have to be multiplied by a damping factor to be selected depending on the material, and is shown in FIG. 6 by the dotted line between times t.sub.2 and t.sub.1. It can be clearly seen that at time t.sub.4, i.e. when the vibratory roller 24 has penetrated the soil to the maximum extent, the damper force component F.sub.b,c is zero, since in this state the soil 12 is at rest and thus velocity-proportional forces become zero. Between times t.sub.4 and t.sub.1, i.e. when the load on the floor 12 is relieved, the damper force component F.sub.b,c counteracts the spring force component F.sub.b,k until these two force components F.sub.b,k (t.sub.1) and F.sub.b,c(t.sub.1) cancel each other out at time t.sub.1.

[0065] The simulation relationship Z.sub.S shown in FIG. 6, which represents the relationship between the ground contact force F.sub.b and the displacement s.sub.w based on the ground model for one vibration cycle, is obtained by adding the spring force component F.sub.b,k and the damper force component F.sub.b,c for each phase of the vibration cycle. This results in a simulation relationship Z.sub.S which, as a comparison of FIGS. 3 and 6 clearly shows, is qualitatively comparable to the measurement relationship Z.sub.M.

[0066] By suitable selection of the quantities entering the ground model, in particular the elasticity modulus E.sub.geo, it becomes possible to influence or change the simulation relationship Z.sub.S in such a way that it substantially corresponds to the measurement relationship. For this purpose, the simulation relationship Z.sub.S can be determined successively using slightly changed input variables, particularly by changing the elasticity modulus E.sub.geo, which represents an essential simulation parameter, and compared to the measurement relationship Z.sub.M in a best-fit process, for example. For this purpose, for example, the ground contact force F.sub.bmean averaged over the duration of at least one vibration cycle, the maximum ground contact force F.sub.bmax in the vibration cycle and the area delimited by the curve representing a respective relationship Z.sub.M or Z.sub.S can be compared with each other as comparison parameters. It should be noted that the average ground contact force F.sub.bmean is substantially equal to the static load exerted over the vibratory roller, since on average the soil compactor does not move upwards or downwards.

[0067] If a deviation is detected for each of these comparison parameters that is below a respective predetermined threshold for it, it is determined that these two relationships Z.sub.S and Z.sub.M substantially match each other, i.e. the deviation between them falls below a predetermined deviation threshold. Thus, it can be determined that the ground model used to obtain such a simulation relationship, with the simulation parameters taken into account in the process, reproduces the soil compacted by the soil compactor 10 with high accuracy. It can then further be determined that one or more of the simulation parameters taken into account in the model, such as the elastic modulus E.sub.geo, actually represents the corresponding soil parameter of the soil 12. In this state, such a simulation parameter can then be stored as a parameter representing the condition of the soil in the context of an area-wide dynamic compaction control. Other variables taken into account in the ground model in the process, such as the relief stiffness factor or the damping factor, can also be stored in connection with the modulus of elasticity as parameters describing the soil, of course in connection with the location at which the soil compactor 10 is located during a respective vibration cycle. Other variables, such as the asymmetry of the contact perimeter length 2b mentioned above, can also be recorded for evaluation or assessment of the quality of the soil 12.

[0068] Other variables, such as the settlement of the soil 12, i.e. the difference in height between the soil 12 before the contact with the vibratory roller 24 and afterwards, or the contact stress resulting from incremental summation of the acting force or the existing contact area, can also be determined and recorded with the procedure according to the invention based on the calculation of the penetration movement of the vibratory roller 24 into the soil 12 described above, or taken into account in the determination of the simulation relationship Z.sub.S and, for example, also be varied as simulation parameters. Furthermore, the phase position or also the direction of rotation of the imbalance arrangement 28 can be derived from the variables determined or calculated in the procedure according to the invention, for example from the acceleration of the vibratory roller 24 in the normal direction N, which is orthogonal to the working direction A, for example if this is not measured. Alternatively or additionally, in particular for providing information about the phase position, i.e. the rotational positioning, of the imbalance arrangement 28, the latter can be associated with a sensor the output signal of which reflects the phase position and thus also the direction of rotation of the imbalance arrangement 28. This information can also be used, for example, in the creation of the measurement relationship Z.sub.M shown in FIG. 3.

[0069] To bring the simulation parameters, such as the modulus of elasticity E.sub.geo, determined in the comparison of the simulation relationship Z.sub.S to the measurement relationship Z.sub.M as representing a respective soil parameter, into even better agreement with the actual condition of a soil, as described above, a correlation between a simulation parameter determined in this way and the value of the respective soil parameter actually present in a soil compacted in the process can be determined in field or laboratory tests in the form of a correlation factor linking these two variables. Such a correlation factor can then also be taken into account within the framework of the area-wide dynamic compaction control by linking it with the respective simulation parameter, i.e. multiplying it, for example, in order to be able to generate a parameter that reflects the actual value of the respective soil parameter with high precision.

[0070] Finally, it should be pointed out that the procedure according to the invention for determining parameters which have a high degree of accuracy in providing information about the condition of a compacted soil can be used for a wide variety of substrates to be compacted. For example, the procedure according to the invention can be used for compacting asphalt, as well as for compacting the soil to be placed under an asphalt layer. In principle, this procedure can be applied to all granular or plastic soil materials that can be compacted by means of such a soil compactor operating with a vibratory roller.

[0071] It should also be noted that the procedure according to the invention can also be used to not only permanently determine and record respective parameters associated with compaction locations in real time during the execution of a soil compaction process, but also to operate the soil compactor carrying out the soil compaction process in feedback in such a way that the compaction result is optimized taking into account the determined condition of the soil. If it is detected during a compaction process using the procedure according to the invention that sufficient compaction has not yet been achieved in specific areas, such areas can be passed over more frequently or repeatedly by controlling the soil compactor accordingly, while areas in which there is already a sufficient degree of compaction do not need to be passed over any further. Thus, a control of the compaction operation can be carried out, in which the soil compactor is either automatically moved by an automated control system to specific areas of a soil to be compacted, or the operator operating a compactor is provided with information about where the soil is to be compacted and in which way, or where it is no longer to be compacted. For example, such information may be graphically displayed on the display unit 22.

[0072] In summary, the method according to the invention for providing information related to the compaction state of a soil when performing a compaction operation with a soil compactor can be presented as follows: [0073] a) detecting a vertical acceleration and a horizontal acceleration of a vibratory roller when moving a soil compactor over a soil to be compacted, for example by means of one or more imbalance sensors, [0074] b) determining a measurement relationship between a ground contact force and a deflection of the vibratory roller for one vibration cycle using the vertical acceleration and horizontal acceleration detected in operation a), [0075] c) determining a simulation relationship between the ground contact force and the deflection for at least one vibration cycle using a ground model taking into account at least one simulation parameter, [0076] d) comparing the simulation relationship to the measurement relationship, [0077] e) determining that a default value of the at least one simulation parameter taken into account in the ground model substantially represents a corresponding soil parameter of the soil to be compacted when the simulation relationship substantially corresponds to the measurement relationship.