Bioactive extract, fraction of <i>Cassia occidentalis </i>and formulation thereof for bone regeneration
11304927 · 2022-04-19
Assignee
Inventors
- Naibedya Chattopadhayay (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Subhashis Pal (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Sudhir Kumar (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Ramakrishna Eppalapally (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Padam Kumar (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Sapana (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Jiaur Rahaman Gayen (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Riyazuddin Mohammed (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Sabyasachi Sanyal (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Anagha Gurjar (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Prabhat Ranjan Mishra (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Naresh Mittapelly (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Kamal Ram Arya (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Brijesh Kumar (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Srikanta Rath (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Arun Kumar Trivedi (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
- Maurya Rakesh (Uttar Pradesh, IN)
Cpc classification
A61K31/7048
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K47/46
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/0053
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K47/10
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61P19/08
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/1075
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61K47/44
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/7048
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The present invention relates to a bioactive extract, fraction of Cassia occidentalis and formulation thereof for bone regeneration and treatment of glucocorticoid induced musculo-skeletal diseases and associated electrolyte imbalances.
Claims
1. A formulation for fracture healing and protection against corticosteroid-induced musculo-skeletal diseases, wherein the formulation comprises Cassia occidentalis extract and/or bioactive fraction optionally along with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, wherein the formulation comprises alcoholic extract and/or bioactive fraction in an amount ranging from 2-10% w/w, oil in an amount ranging from 20-60% w/w, surfactant in an amount ranging from 20-40% w/w, co-surfactant in an amount ranging from 12-28% w/w, solubilizer in an amount ranging from 5-10% w/w, and excipients in an amount ranging from 10-60% w/w.
2. The formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the oil is oleic acid, peanut oil, linoleic acid, soya bean oil, or a combination thereof.
3. The formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the surfactant and cosurfactant is polysorbate 80, polysorbate 20, polysorbate 60, medium-chain triglycerides of caprylic (C8) and capric (10) acids, polyoxyl 35 castor oil, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, propylene glycol monocaprylate 90, tocopherol polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS), poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol) (poloxamer 407), propylene carbonate, polyethylene glycol, or 1,2, ethanediol.
4. The formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the solubilizer is polyethylene glycol, with different molecular weights ranging from 200-5000, glycerol, caprylcaproyl macogol glycerides, lauroglycol, soya lecithin, egg lecithin, cholic acid and deoxycholic acid, polyvinyl caprolactam-polyvinyl acetate polyethylene glycol graft copolymer, sorbitan monolaurate 20, or sorbitan monolaurate 80.
5. The formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the one or more excipients are polymers of sugars or inorganic materials.
6. The formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the formulation is useful for treatment of fracture healing and corticosteroid-induced musculo-skeletal diseases and associated electrolyte imbalances.
7. A process for preparation of the formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the process comprises the steps of: a. percolating powdered Cassia occidentalis plant material with alcohol for a period ranging between 20 to 24 hrs followed by collecting the percolate, b. repeating the step (a) for 4 to 5 times to obtain the alcoholic extract, c. fractioning the alcoholic extract as obtained in step (b) with n-hexane to obtain hexane soluble fraction and hexane insoluble residue, d. triturating the hexane insoluble residue as obtained in step (c) with ethylacetate to obtain ethylacetate soluble fraction and ethylacetate insoluble residue, e. suspending the ethylacetate insoluble residue as obtained in step (d) with water followed by extracting with n-butanol to obtain n-butanol soluble fraction, f. isolating Apigenin, 4-methoxy-2′,4′-dihydroxy chalcone), 7,4′-dihydroxy flavone, Luteolin, 7,3′,4′-trihydroxy-flavone, Emodin, Nicotinic acid, Chrysophanol 1-O-β-Gentiobioside, Rhamnocathartin, Isovitexin or Apigenin 6c-glucoside from the n-butanol soluble fraction as obtained in step (e) by chromatographic methods, g. solubilizing Cassia extract/fraction obtained in step (b) or in step (e) with surfactant mixture under stirring to obtain a nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation, h. converting the emulsion liquid preconcentrate of step (g) into a solid system in situ to obtain the formulation by mixing with a solid carrier wherein the weight ratio of liquid in-situ nanoemulsion system to solid carrier is from 1:0.5 to 1:10.
8. The process as claimed in claim 7 wherein the alcohol is selected from ethanol or butanol.
9. The process as claimed in claim 7 wherein the surfactant mix consists of surfactant 20-40% w/w and co-surfactant 5-10% w/w.
10. The process as claimed in claim 7 wherein the solid carrier is selected from the group consisting of HPMC, soluplus, colloidal silica, hypermellose, and aerosil.
11. The formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the formulation has an effective osteoinductive and a skeletal preservation dose is reduced to 50 mg/kg in a butanolic fraction formulation from 250 mg/kg in an ethanolic extract.
12. The formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the formulation has an effective muscle protective dose is reduced to 50 mg/kg in a butanolic fraction formulation from 250 mg/kg in an ethanolic extract.
13. The formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein the formulation is a bioactive fraction and the relative bioavailability (as shown by AUC) of apigenin 6-C-glucoside/isovitexin (biomarker) in the fraction is enhanced by more than 5 fold as compared to the extract.
14. The formulation of claim 5, wherein the one or more excipients are a polymer of a sugar selected from the group consisting of hypermellose, aeosil, HPMC, and soluplus and/or an inorganic material selected from the group consisting of colloidal silica, calcium carbonate, and calcium phosphate.
15. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the extract/bioactive fraction contains marker compounds Apigenin and Isovitexin.
16. The formulation of claim 15, wherein Apigenin is present in an amount of 0.0005% to 0.002% and Isovitexin is present in an amount of 0.0006% to 0.0008%.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
ABBREVIATIONS
(15) BMC—bone marrow stromal cells
(16) OVX—ovariectomy
(17) BMD—bone mineral density
(18) RCO—Rat calvarial osteoblasts
(19) M.P—Methylprednisolone
(20) FBS—Fetal bovine serum
(21) PBS—Phosphate Buffer Saline
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(22) Accordingly, the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition useful for the treatment of fracture healing and corticosteroid-induced musculo-skeletal diseases and associated electrolyte imbalances comprising of compounds of formula apigenin (219/K007) and apigenin-6-C-glycoside (219/K017),
(23) ##STR00001##
2-10% W/W ethanolic/butanolic fraction of Cassia occidentalis extract(s); oil (20-60% W/W) comprising of peanut or linoleic acid or soya bean oil or a combination thereof; Surfactant 8 HLB-20-40% W/W comprising of Tween 80; co-surfactant—12-28% W/W comprising of 1, 2 ethanediol; Solubilizer—5-10% W/W comprising of PEG 1000.
(24) Another embodiment of the invention provides abioactive fraction (219/F005) obtained from plant Cassia occidentalis stem/leaf wherein the fraction comprises; (219/F005: 1.50 to 1.70% with respect to dry Cassia occidentalis stem, 4772/F004: 1.1 to 1.4% with respect to dry Cassia occidentalis leaves).
(25) Furthermore, another embodiment provides a compound 219/K017 from 219/C002 was significantly more effective than 219/K007 in reversing osteopenia in mice as total bone volume and bone strength of femur were respectively 72% and 80% higher in 219/K017 than 219/K07 treatment.
(26) Another embodiment discloses, Compound 219/K017 (isovitexin) is in the range of 0.0006 to 0.0008%.
(27) Even further, another embodiment provides the fraction 219/F005 was more potent in bone regenerative effect than the extract 219/, as 100 mg/kg dose of 219/F005 had equivalent osteoinduction parameters to that achieved by 219/C002 at 250 mg/kg dose.
(28) Another embodiment discloses the fraction, 219/F005 was more potent than 219/C002 in preserving bone from MP-induced loss as 100 mg/kg dose of 219/F005 had equivalent bone volume and bone strength parameters to that achieved by 219/C002 at 250 mg/kg dose.
(29) Further, another embodiment provides a process for preparation of bioactive fractions from plant Cassia occidentalis stem (plant 219), wherein the process steps comprising: (a) powdering the stems of the plant Cassia occidentalis; (b) percolating the powder as obtained in step (a) with alcohol for a period ranging between 20 to 24 hrs followed by collecting the percolate; (c) repeating the step (b) for 4 to 5 times to obtain the alcoholic extract 219/C002; (d) fractioning the alcoholic extract as obtained in step (c) with n-hexane to obtain hexane soluble fraction and hexane insoluble residue; (e) triturating the hexane insoluble residue as obtained in step (d) with ethylacetate to obtain ethylacetate soluble fraction and ethylacetate insoluble residue; (f) suspending the ethylacetate insoluble residue as obtained in step (e) with water followed by extracting with n-butanol to obtain n-butanol soluble fraction 219/F005; (g) isolating 10 compounds 219/K007 to 219/K015 and 219/K015, 219/K017 from fraction 219/F005 by chromatographic methods; (h) Solubilizing cassia extract (2 to 10% w/w) obtained in step (e) in 75 to 150 mL of surfactant mixture to obtain the formulation; optionally dissolving the fraction (2 to 10% w/w) obtained in step (f) in 75 to 150 mL of surfactant mixture to obtain the formulation.
(30) Furthermore, another embodiment provides the excipients used herein are polymers from sugars such as hypermellose, HPC etc. or inorganic materials such as colloidal silica. The ratio of liquid in-situ nanoemulsion system to solid carrier was from 1:0.5 to 1:10.
(31) Furthermore, another embodiment provides the formulation wherein the relative bioavailability (as shown by AUC) of the apigenin 6-C-glucoside (biomarker) is enhanced by more than 5 fold as compared to the extract.
(32) Furthermore, the formulation, 219/C002-F had significantly greater bone regenerative effect than 219/C002.
(33) Furthermore, another embodiment discloses, the formulation, 219/F005-F was more potent in bone regenerative effect than 219/F005 as 50 mg/kg dose of 219/F005-F had equivalent increase in serum osteogenic marker to that achieved by 219/F005 at 100 mg/kg dose.
(34) Furthermore, the formulation, 219/F005-F was more potent than 219/C002 in preserving bone from MP-induced loss as 50 mg/kg dose of 219/F005-F had equivalent bone volume and bone strength parameters to that achieved by 219/F005 at 100/kg dose.
(35) Even furthermore, the formulation wherein the effective osteoinductive and skeletal preservation dose is reduced to 50 mg/kg in 219/F005-F from 250 mg/kg in 219/C002.
(36) Furthermore, another embodiment discloses the formulation wherein the effective muscle protective dose is reduced to 50 mg/kg in 219/F005-F from 250 mg/kg in 219/C002. 1. Isolation of compounds from n-butanol soluble fraction (219/F005) of Cassia occidentalis stems (
(37) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Principal Component Analysis of 219/C002 [Ethanolic extract of stem] mg/g Emodin 0.50 Chlorogenic acid 0.38 Ferulic acid 0.8 Protocatachuic acid 1.28 Apigenin 1.95 Kaempferol 0.41 Lutcolin 6.23 Quercetin 2.0 3′,4′,7-trihydroxyflavone 58.4 Isovitexin/apigeninC- 7.28 glucoside Rhamnocathartin 0.61 4. Two different fraction of ethanolic extract (219/C002, 4772/A001) were evaluated for new bone formation at fracture site. It was found that 219/C002 is active at 250 mg/Kg dose and 4772/A001 showed activity at 750 mg/kg dose. (
(38) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 List of pure compound isolated from 219/C002 and their osteogenic concentrations Name of the compound Activity 219/K007 + (1 μM) 219/K008 − 219/K009 + (10 nM) 219/K010 + (1 nM) 219/K011 + (10 nM) 219/K012 + (10 nM) 219/K013 − 219/K014 − 219/K015 − 219/K017 + (1 μM) 6. Mineralization assay were performed by using 6 active component of the extract and all the compounds promoted mineralized nodule formation. (
(39) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparative PK of the unformulated and formulated fraction Formulation contains excipients that are GRAS (generally recognized as safe) under sections 201(s) and 409 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of U.S. FDA 219/K007 219/K017 C.sub.max AUC C.sub.max AUC Oral dose (ng/mL) (hr*ng/mL) (ng/mL) (hr*ng/mL) 219-C002 500 mg/kg 0.93 ± 0.06 4.63 ± 2.34 0.15 ± 0.03 5.05 ± 0.57 extract 219-C002 500 mg/kg 1.19 ± 1.37 5.65 ± 2.47 4.34 ± 1.55 26.21 ± 17.19 formulation 11. Fracture healing efficacy of 219/F005 (butanolic fraction) at 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg dose and found that 100 mg/kg was the effective dose. (
(40) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Comparative analysis among different fraction of Cassia extract for secondary osteoporosis. MP+ MP+ MP+ 219/C002 219/F005 219/F005-F Parameter Sham MP (250 mg/kg) (100 mg/kg) (50 mg/kg) BMD (gm-HA/cm.sup.3) 0.383 ± 0.016 0.281 ± 0.015** 0.347 ± 0.012 0.342 ± 0.014 0.388 ± 0.021 BV/TV (%) 25.04 ± 1.32 18.33 ± 0.96*** 21.66 ± 0.86*.sup.,a 21.84 ± 0.77*.sup.,b 24.21 ± 0.99 Serum PINP 82.16 ± 3.02 50.17 ± 2.57*** 69.09 ± 5.02*.sup.,a 76.21 ± 5.86 77.18 ± 5.33 (ng/ml) Max power (N) 119.01 ± 5.32 82.17 ± 3.77** 93.5 ± 4.37*.sup.,a 107.33 ± 3.56 119.33 ± 4.84 Energy (mJ) 121.35 ± 6.64 75.67 ± 3.48** 98.2 ± 6.71*.sup.,a 105.67 ± 6.01 116.33 ± 3.77 Stiffness 143.2 ± 7.27 108.17 ± 5.18** 123.5 ± 3.81* 124.5 ± 4.81 138.5 ± 5.17 (N/mm) Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10/group); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus vehicle. .sup.aP < 0.05 and .sup.bP < 0.01 versus MP. 14. Serum electrolytes were measured and found that after MP treatment serum sodium level was increased and potassium level was decreased. 219/C002 (ethanolic fraction) could significantly mitigate changes in electrolyte and butanolic fraction (particularly formulation) completely restored serum sodium imbalance in MP treated animals. (
EXAMPLES
(41) The following examples are given by way of the illustration of the present invention and should not be construed to limit the scope of the present invention.
Example 1 Specifications of Raw Materials Used in the Extraction Process
(42) C. occidentalis Linn. which is known as Kaasaariin Ayurveda, Kasondi in Hindi and Coffee Senna in English, belongs to Caesalpiniaceae family. It is an erect herb, commonly found by road sides, ditches and waste dumping sites throughout India. C. occidentalis is a common weed found throughout India (up to an altitude of 1500 m) from Jammu and Kashmir to Kanyakumari and used for a variety of purposes in indigenous, and folk medicines. The plant C. occidentalis was collected from Gram Panchayat, Raipur Raja VikasKhandBaksiKaTalab, Itaunza, Lucknow—226203 Uttar Pradesh. Plant species is abundantly available in the wild and collected from the surrounding areas of aforementioned geographical location (27.08080 N and 80.89590 E). Stem of the plant was separated and allowed to dry under shade. Ten kg each of dried stem (Cassia occidentalis stem, CDRI plant code No. 219) and leaves (Cassia occidentalis leaves, CDRI plant code No. 4772) was powdered prior to extraction.
Example 2
(43) Preparation of Ethanolic Extract of C. occidentalis Stems (219/C002)
(44) The powdered stem (10 kg) placed in a percolator with ethanol (35 L) and allowed to stand for about 24 h. The percolate was collected. This process of extraction was repeated 5×. The combined extract was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure at 45° C. Weight of the extract obtained was 600.00 g (6% of 219/C002).
Example 3
(45) Fractionation of Ethanolic Extract of C. occidentalis Stem
(46) Ethanolic extract (600 g, 219/C002) of stem was triturated with hexane (500 ml×5). The n-hexane soluble fraction was concentrated under the reduced pressure at 40° C. Weight of hexane soluble fraction was 180 g (1.8% with respect to dry plant material, F003). The insoluble residue was triturated with ethylacetate (500 ml×4) and the ethylacetate soluble fraction was concentrated under reduced pressure at 40° C., that yielded 72 g (0.72% with respect to dry plant material, F004). Then ethylacetate insoluble residue was suspended into water (500 ml), extracted with n-butanol (300 ml×5). The combined n-butanol soluble fraction was concentrated under the reduced pressure at 45° C. and weight of n-butanol soluble fraction was 168 g (1.68% with respect to dry plant material, F005). The aqueous fraction obtained was 170 g (1.7% with respect to dry plant material, F006).
Example 4
(47) Isolation of Compounds from n-Butanol Soluble Fraction (219/F005)
(48) The n-butanol soluble fraction (219/F005, 168.0 g) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (1.5 kg, 60-120 mesh) eluted with a gradient solvent of chloroform-methanol (100:00, 95:05, 90:10, 85:15, 80:20, 75:25, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50) and finally eluted with methanol yielded fifty fractions (1000 ml each). On the basis of TLC profile, similar fractions were combined to give ten sub-fractions, F005A-F005J.
(49) Sub-fraction F005B was subjected to column chromatography over a silica gel (230-400) using a gradient solvent system chloroform-methanol. On elution of column with chloroform-methanol (99;1) afforded yellow color solid (30 mg, 0.0003%, designated as 219/K007, identified as apigenin). On further elution of column with chloroform-methanol (98:2) afforded brick red colored solid compound (15 mg, 0.00015%, designated as 219/K008, identified as 4-methoxy-2′,4′-dihydroxy chalcone) and elution with chloroform-methanol (95:5) afforded pale yellow colored solid compound (10 mg, 0.00010%, designated as 219/K009, identified as 7,4′-dihydroxy flavone).
(50) Sub-fraction F005C was subjected to column chromatography over a silica gel (230-400) using a gradient solvent system chloroform-methanol. On elution of column with chloroform-methanol (95:5) afforded yellow solid compound (34 mg, 0.00034%, designated as 219/K010, identified as luteolin). On further elution of column with chloroform-methanol (94:6) afforded greenish yellow colored solid compound (8 mg, 0.00008%, designated as 219/K011, identified as 7, 3′, 4′-trihydroxy-flavone).
(51) Sub-fraction F005D was subjected to column chromatography using a chloroform-methanol with varying polarity. On elution of column with chloroform-methanol (92:8) afforded orange red colored compound (15 mg, 0.00015%, designated as 219/K012, identified as emodin) and further elution with chloroform-methanol (90:10) afforded brown solid (20 mg, 0.00020%, designated as 219/K013, identified as nicotinic acid).
(52) Sub-fraction F005E was subjected to reverse phase chromatography over RP-18 by using varying amount of methanol in water as eluent system. On elution of column with water-methanol (75:25) afforded (4 mg, 0.00004%, designated as 219/K014, identified as chrysophanol 1-O-β-Gentiobioside) and on further elution of column with water-methanol (70:30) afforded (4 mg, 0.00004%, designated as 219/K015, identified as rhamnocathartin).
(53) Sub-fraction F005F was subjected to reverse phase chromatography over RP-18 by using varying amount of methanol in water as eluent system. On elution of column with water-methanol (65:35) afforded (70 mg, 0.0007%, designated as 219/K017, identified as isovitexin).
Example 5
(54) Preparation of Ethanolic Extract of C. occidentalis Leaves (4772/A001)
(55) Powdered leaves of C. occidentalis (10 kg) were placed in percolator with ethanol (40 L) and allowed to stand at room temperature for about 24 hours. The percolate was collected. This process of extraction was repeated 5×. The combined extract was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure at 45° C. Weight of extract was 700 g (yield 7%, designated as 4772/A001).
Example 6
(56) Fractionation of Ethanolic Extract (4772/A001) of C. occidentalis Leaves
(57) Ethanol extract (700 g) was triturated with hexane (500 ml×5). The hexane soluble fraction was then concentrated under the reduced pressure at 40° C., weight of hexane fraction obtained 300 g (3%, 4772/F002). The insoluble residue was triturated with ethylacetate (500 ml×4), the ethylacetate soluble fraction was concentrated under reduced pressure at 40° C., yielded 60 g (0.6%, with respect to dry plant material, 4772/F003). The insoluble residue was suspended in water (500 ml), extracted with n-butanol (250 ml×5). The n-butanol soluble fraction was concentrated under the reduced pressure at 45° C. Weight of n-butanol soluble and water soluble fraction was 120 g (1.2%, 4772/F004) and 200 g (2%, 4772/F005) respectively.
Example 7
(58) Isolation of Compounds from n-Butanol Soluble Fraction (4772/F004)
(59) The n-butanol soluble fraction (4772/F004, 120.0 g) was subjected to a column chromatography over silica gel (1.25 Kg, 60-120 mesh) eluted with gradient solvent of chloroform:methanol (100:00, 95:05, 90:10, 80:20, 75:25, 70:30, 50:50) and finally with methanol yielded forty fractions (1000 ml each). On the basis of TLC profile, similar fractions were combined to give seven sub-fractions F004A-F00G.
(60) Sub-fraction F004A was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (230-400) using gradient solvent system chloroform:methanol. On elution of column with chloroform:methanol (99:1) afforded white crystals (40 mg, 0.0004% designated as 4772/K006, identified as 2-C-Methyl-D-erythrono-1,4-lactone).
(61) Sub-fraction F004B was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (230-400) using gradient solvent system chloroform:methanol. On elution of column with chloroform:methanol (98:2) afforded white crystals (100 mg, 0.001% designated as 4772/K011, identified as chrysoeriol). On further elution of column with mixture of chloroform:methanol (98:02) afforded yellow solid (100 mg, 0.001% designated as 4772/K012, identified as apigenin, identical with 219/K007 isolated from stem).
(62) Sub-fraction F004C was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (230-400) using gradient solvent system chloroform:methanol. On elution of column with mixture of chloroform:methanol (95:05) to give white crystals (80 mg, 0.0008%, designated as 4772/K013, identified as 1H-indole-3-carboxylic acid).
(63) Sub-fraction F004D was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (230-400) using gradient solvent system chloroform:methanol. On elution of column with mixture of chloroform:methanol (96:4) to gave greenish powder (50 mg, 0.0005%, designated as 4772/K014, identified aspterospermin C).
(64) Sub-fraction F004E was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (230-400) using gradient solvent system chloroform:methanol. On elution of column with mixture of chloroform:methanol (95:5) to gave yellow crystals (40 mg, 0.0004%, designated as 4772/K015, identified as luteolin, identical with 219/K010 isolated from stem).
(65) Sub-fraction F004F was subjected to reverse phase column chromatography over RP-18 silica gel using mixture of water:methanol solvent system. Elution of column with mixture of water:methanol (80:20) afforded pale yellow solid (300 mg, 0.003%, designated as 4772/K016, identified as isovitexin, identical with 219/K017 isolated from stem).
Example 8
(66) Confirmation of Oral Absorption by Finger Printing
(67) Instrument Used:
(68) LC-MS/MS-API 4000 (Q-TRAP) triple quadrupole (AB-SCIEX, Toronto, Canada). The mass spectrometer was operated using an electrospray atmospheric pressure ionization source in positive ion mode.
(69) a) Fingerprinting of 219/C002 Extract
(70) Primary stock: 1 mg/mL in DMSO
(71) Secondary stock: 50 ng/mL in Methanol
(72) Continuous injection at 10 μL/min from secondary stock.
(73) b) Fingerprinting of Blank Rat Plasma:
(74) Blood was collected from overnight fasted rats and plasma was seperated. Plasma was precipitated with methanol (1:5 v/v), vortexed and centrifuged. The supernatant was collected and diluted with methanol (1:10 v/v). Continuous injection at 10 μL/min
(75) c) Fingerprinting of 250 mg/kg (Oral) 219/C002 Treated Rat Plasma
(76) Overnight fasted rats were administered 250 mg/kg 219/C002 extract suspension orally. Blood was collected after 45 min and plasma was separated. Plasma was precipitated with methanol (1:5 v/v), vortexed and centrifuged. The supernatant was collected and diluted with methanol (1:10 v/v). Continuous injection into the column at 10 μL/min.
Example 9
(77) Rat Calvarial Osteoblasts (RCO) Culture
(78) Calvaria from ten to twelve 1-2 day old rat pups were harvested, cleaned, and subjected to five sequential enzymatic digestions (0.1% diaspase and 0.1% collagenase I) of 10-15 min each. Cells from second to fifth digestion were collected, centrifuged, re-suspended and cultured in α-MEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (complete growth medium).
Example 10
(79) Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Assay
(80) For ALP assay, RCO were trypsinized at 80% confluence and 2×10.sup.3 cells/well were seeded onto 24-well plates. Cells were treated with different compounds isolated from extract & vehicle for 48 h in α-MEM supplemented with 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 50 mg/ml ascorbic acid and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (osteoblast differentiation medium).
(81) At the end of the experiment, cells were washed with PBS, freeze fractured by placing the plates at −70° C. for 15 minutes followed by bringing to room temperature. ALP activity was measured by adding 100 □l p-nitrophenylphosphate buffer (2 mg/ml pNPP and 0.25 mM MgCl.sub.2 in 1 M diethanolamine). The absorption was measured at 405 nm with a microplate reader.
Example 11
(82) Mineralization of BMCs
(83) The effect of active compounds on the mineralization of bone marrow stromal cells (BMCs), cells were harvested from the femurs of 3-month-old female rats (180 gm). Bone marrow was flushed out in 10 ml of osteoblast differentiation medium containing 10.sup.−7M dexamethasone (bone marrow differentiation medium). Released BMCs were collected and seeded (4×10.sup.6 cells/well) onto 12-well plates in bone marrow differentiation medium. BMCs were cultured with various compounds for 21 days at 37° C. in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO.sub.2 with change in medium every 48 h.
(84) At the end of the experiment, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 minutes. Calcium deposition by osteoblasts in the form of mineralized nodule was determined by alizarin red-S staining. Extraction of the stain was performed by 10% centylpyridiniumchloride (CPC) for colorimetric quantification at 595 nm.
Example 12
(85) Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed to determine the relative expressions of osteoblast and osteoclast specific genes in bones. GAPDH was used as the internal control. Primers were designed by the Universal ProbeLibrary (Roche Applied Science) for the following genes: RunX2, BMP2 and type 1 collagen (Col1). cDNA was synthesized with RevertAidcDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, Austin, USA) using 2 μg total RNA. Relative mRNA levels of these genes was determined using a Light Cycler 480 through SYBR green chemistry (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, USA).
Example 13
(86) Drill-Hole Injury in the Femur:
(87) A drill-hole was created in adult rats by inserting a drill bit with a diameter of 0.8 mm in the anterior portion of the diaphysis of femur, 2 cm above the knee joint. Treatments were given for 12 days prior to termination. 24 h before termination, calcein, a bone-seeking fluorochrome was administered to each rats (20 mg/kg, i.p.) to measure new bone formation at the fractured callus. On the 12.sup.th day, rats were killed and femurs were collected and stored in 70% isopropanol for 48 h, and embedded in an acrylic material. Sections (60 μm) through the fracture callus were made using Isomet-Slow Speed Bone Cutter (Buehler, Lake Bluff, Ill.) followed by photography using confocal microscope (LSM 510 Meta, Carl Zeiss, Inc., Jena, Germany) with appropriate filters. The intensity of calcein binding was calculated using Carl Zeiss AM 4.2 image-analysis software.
Example 14
(88) Osteopenic Mice Model:
(89) 50 adult female balb/c mice (20±3 g, 10-12 months) underwent either sham surgery or ovariectomy (OVX). 6 weeks post-surgery, mice were scanned using μCT to ensure development of osteopenia. Treatments of 219/K007 (5 mg/kg), 219/K017 (1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg), PTH (40 μg/kg) and vehicle (water) were given to OVX mice with osteopenia for another 6 weeks, and vehicle treatment was given to sham operated mice for the same duration (n=10/group). After 6 weeks all mice were sacrificed and bones were collected for further experiment.
Example 15
(90) MP induced secondary osteoporosis model:
(91) 50 adult male SD rats (260±20 g, 8-10 months) were divided into 5 groups. 5 mg/Kg methylprednisolone was administered subcutaneously for 1 month to induce osteoporosis. 219/C002 (250 mg/kg), 219/F005 (100 mg/Kg), 219/F005-F (50 mg/kg) treatment were given to check the efficacy of the extract and its different fraction along with methylprednisolone (n=10/group). After 1 month all rats were sacrificed and bones were collected for further experiment.
Example 16
(92) CT Analysis:
(93) A high-resolution X-ray micro-computed tomographic (μCT) for two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) assessment of bones (excised bones) were carried out using a Sky Scan 1076 μCT scanner (SkyScan, Ltd, Kartuizersweg, Kontich, Belgium). Briefly, after scanning bone samples at a nominal resolution (pixels) of 9 μm, cross-sectional reconstruction was made using SkyScanNrecon software based on a modified Feldkamp algorithm. To analyze trabecular bone, region of interest was drawn on a total of 100 slices in the region of secondary spongiosa situated 1.5 mm away from the distal border of growth plate (GP) excluding primary spongiosa and cortical bone. Quantification was done by employing Batman software encumbered with trabecular (3D) and cortical (2D) bone programs. Using μCT scans, trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) of femurs was determined from the volume of interest made for cortical and trabecular region, respectively. For calibration, hydroxyl apatite phantom rods of 4 mm of diameter with known BMD (0.25 g/cm.sup.3 and 0.75 g/cm.sup.3) were employed.
Example 17
(94) Measurement of Bone-Turnover Markers:
(95) Animals were kept in metabolic cages without food but with respective treatment and ad libitum water. Fasting serum samples were collected after 24 h. Serumprocollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) levels were determined by ELISA (MyBioSource, USA.), following the manufacturer's protocols.
Example 18
(96) Three Point Bending Test:
(97) Bone mechanical strength was examined by three-point bending of femur diaphysis with bone strength tester TK 252C (Muromachi Kikai Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).
Example 19
(98) Measurement of Muscle Atrophy
(99) Gastrocnemius muscle samples were collected from each group and protein lysates were prepared to determine the levels of muscle atrogenes [atrogin 1, muscle ring finger protein (MuRF1)]. Relative expression of these proteins were detected by immunoblot analysis using specific antibodies, atrogin 1 (Abcam; 1:1000 dilution), MuRF1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1000 dilution) and GAPDH (Thermo Scientific; 1:1000 dilution). Densitometric analyses of immunoblots from three independent experiments were performed using ImageJ software.
Example 20
(100) Measurement of Serum Cations:
(101) Serum level of the Na.sup.+ and K.sup.+ were determined using Blood-Gas-Electrolyte MetaboliteAnalyser. Serum calcium was determined by a colorimetric kt (Sigma-Aldrich).
Example 21
(102) Measurement of Biomarkers in Serum:
(103) The mass spectrometer [LC-MS/MS-API 4000 (Q-TRAP) triple quadrupole (AB-SCIEX, Toronto, Canada)] was used for the assay. Overnight fasted rats were administered 250 mg/kg extract suspension orally. Blood was collected after 45 min and plasma was separated. Plasma was precipitated with methanol, vortexed and centrifuged. The supernatant was collected and diluted with methanol. Continuous injection at 10 μL/min was done for extract, blank plasma and extract treated plasma. 23 compounds were detected in extract and in extract-treated rat plasma but not in blank rat plasma. 5 out of 23 are known/characterized molecule named Picolonic acid; 4′,7-dihydroxyflavone; Apigenin; Luteolin; Apigenin 6-C-glucoside. This experiment confirms the oral absorption of biomarkers present in the extract.
Example 22
(104) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation was prepared by mixing weighed quantity of C. occidentalis extract (219/C002)(2.5% W/W) with oleic acid (25 W/W), peanut oil (25% W/W), polysorbate 80 (25% W/W), and 1, 2 ethanediol (22.5% W/W). The mixture was stirred at 45.0 for 12 hr to obtain a clear dispersion. This formulation was stored at ambient temperature for further use.
Example 23
(105) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation was prepared by dissolving weighed quantity of C. occidentalis extract (219/C002) (5% W/W) in the mixture of soya oil (55% W/W), Pluronic PF 127 (20% W/W), propylene carbonate (20% W/W) and poly ethylene glycol 1000. The mixture was kept on stirring at room temperature to get a clear solution. The formulation was stored at room temperature until further use.
Example 24
(106) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation was prepared by mixing weighed quantity of C. occidentalis extract (219/C002) (10% W/W) in the mixture of oleic acid (50% W/W), vitamin E Tocopherol succinate poly ethylene glycol 1000 (2% W/W) and 1, 2 ethanediol 28% W/W. The mixture was stirred at ambient conditions to form a clear pre-concentrate. The formulation was stored until use ambient conditions.
Example 25
(107) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation was prepared by mixing weighed quantity of C. occidentalis extract (219/C002) (10% W/W) in the mixture of Caproyl 90 (30% W/W), Cremophor EL® (25 W/W), Transcutol (30% W/W). The mixture was stirred for 24 hr at room temperature a get a clear solution and the formulation was stored at room temperature till further use.
Example 26
(108) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation was prepared by mixing weighed quantity of C. occidentalis extract (219/C002) (10% W/W) in the mixture of Labrafac™ (45% W/W), polysorbate 80 (20%) and 1, 2 ethanediol (25% W/W). The mixture was stirred for 12 hr to obtain a clear solution. This formulation was stored at room temperature.
Example 27 (219/F005-F)
(109) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation was prepared by mixing weighed quantity of C. occidentalis fraction (219/F005) (2% W/W) with peanut oil (25% W/W), oleic acid (25 W/W), polysorbate 80 (25% W/W), and 1, 2ethanediol (23% W/W). The mixture was stirred at 45.0 for 12 hr to obtain a clear dispersion. This formulation was stored at ambient temperature for further use.
Example 28 (219/F005-F)
(110) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation was prepared by mixing weighed quantity of C. occidentalis fraction (219/F005) (10% W/W) in the mixture of oleic acid (50% W/W), 1, 2 ethanediol 28% W/W and vitamin E Tocopherol succinate poly ethylene glycol 1000 (2% W/W). The mixture was stirred at ambient conditions to form a clear pre-concentrate. The formulation was stored until use ambient conditions.
Example 29 (219/F005-F)
(111) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation was prepared by mixing weighed quantity of C. occidentalis fraction (219/F005) (10% W/W) in the mixture of polysorbate 80 (20% W/W), Labrafac™ (45% W/W), and 1, 2ethanediol (25% W/W). The mixture was stirred for 12 hr to obtain a clear solution. This formulation was stored at room temperature.
Example 30
(112) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate was converted in to solid systems in situ by mixing Aerosil® in ethanol in 1:1 ratio with nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation followed by spray drying.
Example 31
(113) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate was converted in to solid systems in situ by mixing hypermellose containing water and ethanol (2:8 v/v) mixture with nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation in a 2:1 ratio followed by spray drying.
Example 32
(114) The nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate was converted in to solid systems in situ by mixing HPMC and Soluplus® in water and ethanol (2:8 v/v) and nanoemulsion liquid preconcentrate formulation in a 1:1 ratio followed by spray drying.
Example 33
(115) LC-MS/MS method was developed for Biomarkers (apigenin and apigenin 6-C-glucoside) in negative ion mode for the oral PK studies.
(116) Shimadzu HPLC apparatus consisted of LC-20AD binary pumps and SIL-HTcautosampler, (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to inject 10 μL aliquots of the processed samples on a Phenomenex Luna C18 column (4.6×150 mm, 5.0 μm). The system was run in isocratic mode with the mobile phase consisting of methanol and 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer in the ratio of 95:5 (v/v) at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Mobile phase was duly filtered through 0.22 μm Millipore filter (Billerica, USA) and degassed ultrasonically for 15 min prior to use. Separations were performed at room temperature. Run time was for 4 min. Quercetin (50 ng/mL) was used as internal standard.
(117) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 7 LC-MS/MS method developed for Biomarkers (apigenin and apigenin 6-C-glucoside). Compound dependent Apigenin Quercetin parameters Apigenin 6-C-glucoside (I.S) Parent ion (m/z) 269.3 431.2 301.2 Daughter ion (m/z) 116.9 311 151 Dwell time (msec) 150 150 150 Declustering potential (V) −76 −100 −76 Entrance potential (V) −10 −10 −10 Collision energy (V) −49 −20 −31 Collision cell exit potential (V) −5 −31 −10 Source dependent parameters Ion source temperature (° C.) 500 Ion source gas 1 50 Ion source gas 2 50 Ion spray voltage (V) −4500 Collision gas 12 Curtain gas 30
(118) Rats were divided into two groups with six animals in each:
(119) 219-0002 extract—500 mg/kg
(120) 219-0002 formulation—500 mg/kg
(121) Rats were administered respective dose after fasting for overnight. Blood samples were collected at 5, 15 min, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Plasma was separated and processed for analysis. Data was analyzed by WinNonlin software.
ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION
(122) i. Cassia occidentalis extract, fraction and formulation for bone regeneration ii. Prevention for glucocorticoid-induced musculo-skeletal diseases caused due glucocorticoid iii. Treatment for glucocorticoid-induced musculo-skeletal diseases