Fire suppression agent composition

11291876 · 2022-04-05

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

Disclosed is a fire suppression agent composition including CF.sub.3I and an additional fire suppression agent selected from the group consisting of HFC-23, HFC-125, HFC-227ea, dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one (Novec 1230), and HCFO-1233zd(E), wherein the fire suppression agent composition passes the FAA aerosol can test.

Claims

1. A fire suppression agent composition comprising CF.sub.3I and an additional fire suppression agent selected from the group consisting of HFC-23, dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one, and HCFO-1233zd(E), wherein the fire suppression agent composition passes the FAA aerosol can test and CF.sub.3I is present in an amount of 40 to 70 wt %, based on the total weight of the fire suppression agent composition and the additional fire suppression agent is present in an amount greater than or equal to 30 wt %, based on the total weight of the fire suppression agent composition; wherein the molar ratio of CF.sub.3I to the additional fire suppression agent is 1.0 to 1.2.

2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the additional fire suppression agent has a boiling point lower than CF.sub.3I.

3. The composition of claim 2, wherein the difference between the boiling points is greater than or equal to 10° C.

4. The composition of claim 2, wherein the difference between the boiling points is greater than or equal to 25° C.

5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the additional fire suppression agent is selected from the group consisting of dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one and HCFO-1233zd(E).

6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the additional fire suppression agent is selected from the group consisting of dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one.

7. A fire suppression agent composition consisting of CF.sub.3I and an additional fire suppression agent selected from the group consisting of HFC-23, dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one, and HCFO-1233zd(E), wherein the fire suppression agent composition passes the FAA aerosol can test and CF.sub.3I is present in an amount of 40 to 70 wt %, based on the total weight of the fire suppression agent composition; wherein the molar ratio of CF.sub.3I to the additional fire suppression agent is 1.0 to 1.2.

8. The fire suppression agent composition of claim 7, wherein the additional fire suppression agent is present in an amount greater than or equal to 30 wt %, based on the total weight of the first suppression agent composition.

9. The composition of claim 7, wherein the additional fire suppression agent has a boiling point lower than CF.sub.3I.

10. The composition of claim 9, wherein the difference between the boiling points is greater than or equal to 10° C.

11. The composition of claim 7, wherein the additional fire suppression agent is selected from the group consisting of dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one and HCFO-1233zd(E).

12. The composition of claim 7, wherein the additional fire suppression agent is selected from the group consisting of dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(1) A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed composition are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation.

(2) The FAA aerosol can test (FAA-ACT) simulates a fire in an aircraft cargo bay container that heats an aerosol can, causing it to burst and fueling an explosion. In the FAA-ACT, a heated container at about 16 bar, releases its contents (270 grams (g) ethanol, 90 g propane, and 90 g water), as a two-phase impulsive spray via a fast-acting valve. A continuous direct current arc across electrodes (6.4 mm gap, shielded from the high-velocity spray) located about 1 meter downstream of the valve ignites the mixture. The fireball expands into the chamber atmosphere of premixed ambient air, water vapor and suppressant. The temperature and pressure in the chamber increase over a time of about 1 second, and in the absence of suppressant, the peak pressure rise is about 2 bar. During each test, instruments record the pressure, temperature, visual images, and concentrations of agent and oxygen. Unconfined tests without suppressant create a 3.4 m diameter fire ball.

(3) Currently there is no efficient, non-toxic replacement for Halon 1301 which has a low ozone depletion potential (ODP). Described herein is a fire suppression agent composition comprising CF.sub.3I and an additional fire suppression agent selected from the group consisting of HFC-23, HFC-125, HFC-227ea, dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one (Novec 1230), and HCFO-1233zd(E), wherein the fire suppression agent composition passes the FAA aerosol can test.

(4) CF.sub.3I and blends including CF.sub.3I are an environmentally attractive alternative to fire extinguishing agents like Halon 1301 because CF.sub.3I has a lower ozone depletion potential than Halon 1301. The lower ozone depletion potential is due to the lower stability of the molecule. However, CF.sub.3I does have an unsuitable toxicity profile. The blends described herein address these issues by providing a fire suppression agent composition that can pass the FAA-ACT, has a more acceptable toxicity profile than CF.sub.3I and has a lower ozone depletion potential than Halon 1301.

(5) The fire suppression agent composition includes CF.sub.3I in combination with an additional fire suppression agent selected from the group consisting of HFC-23, HFC-125, HFC-227ea, dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one (Novec 1230), and HCFO-1233zd(E). The CF.sub.3I may be present in an amount greater than or equal to 30 wt %, or, greater than or equal to 35 wt %, or, greater than or equal to 40 wt %, based on the total weight of the fire suppression agent composition. The CF.sub.3I may be present in an amount less than or equal to 70 wt %, based on the total weight of the fire suppression agent composition.

(6) The additional fire suppression agent may be present in an amount greater than or equal to 30 wt %, or, greater than or equal to 35 wt %, or, greater than or equal to 40 wt %, based on the total weight of the fire suppression agent composition. The additional fire suppression agent may be present in an amount less than or equal to 70 wt %, based on the total weight of the fire suppression agent composition.

(7) Exemplary combinations are shown in the following table.

(8) TABLE-US-00001 CF.sub.3I HFC-125 45 wt % 55 wt % CF.sub.3I Novec 1230 44 wt % 56 wt % CF.sub.3I HCFO- 66 wt % 1233zd(e) 34 wt %

(9) In some embodiments the molar ratio of CF.sub.3I to the additional fire suppression agent is 0.4 to 1.5, or, 0.5 to 1.3, or 1.0 to 1.2.

(10) In some embodiments the additional fire suppression agent has a boiling point less than the boiling point of CF.sub.3I. The difference between the boiling points can be greater than or equal to 10° C., or, greater than or equal to 30° C.

(11) The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the present disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, element components, and/or groups thereof.

(12) While the present disclosure has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present disclosure without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this present disclosure, but that the present disclosure will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims.