Switch device for regulating movement of operation member
11309145 ยท 2022-04-19
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G05G1/08
PHYSICS
G05G1/02
PHYSICS
H01H13/52
ELECTRICITY
International classification
G05G1/08
PHYSICS
H01H13/52
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
A switch device reduces an impact sound generated when the operation member returns to its original position. The switch device includes a housing member, an operation knob accommodated in the housing member and capable of being pushed, and a spring that urges the operation knob in a direction opposite to the pushing direction. The housing member includes a two-pronged stopper that regulates the movement of the operation knob in the opposite direction. The operation knob includes a tab that abuts on the two-pronged stopper. When the movement of the operation knob in the opposite direction is regulated, the two-pronged stopper and the tab make a line contact first.
Claims
1. A switch device comprising: a housing member; an operation member accommodated in the housing member and capable of being pushed; and an urging member that urges the operation member in a direction opposite to a pushing direction, wherein: the housing member includes a regulating portion that regulates movement of the operation member in the opposite direction, the operation member includes a portion to be regulated that abuts on the regulating portion, the regulating portion and the portion to be regulated are once apart from each other before the portion to be regulated abuts on the regulating portion, when the movement of the operation member in the opposite direction is regulated, the regulating portion and the portion to be regulated make a line contact with each other first, the regulating portion is formed by a two-pronged receiving portion extending in the pushing direction, the portion to be regulated is formed by a protrusion protruding from the operation member, the movement of the operation member is regulated in a state where the protrusion abuts on the receiving portion, when assuming the pushing direction as a standard direction, a tilt angle regarding the standard direction of a first slope formed at a portion of the receiving portion abutting on the protrusion is different from a tilt angle regarding the standard direction of a second slope formed at a portion of the protrusion abutting on the receiving portion, and the tilt angle of the first slope is gentler than the tilt angle of the second slope.
2. The switch device according to claim 1, wherein the receiving portion has a higher flexibility than the protrusion.
3. The switch device according to claim 1, wherein the receiving portion is formed at an opening formed on a side surface of the housing member, and the protrusion protrudes from an outer peripheral surface of the operation member toward the opening.
4. The switch device according to claim 1, wherein after the housing member and the portion to be regulated are apart from one another, the portion to be regulated abuts on the regulating portion due to an urging force of the urging member.
5. The switch device according to claim 1, wherein the urging direction is opposite to the pushing direction.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
(7) Hereinafter, an embodiment will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be noted that the scope of the present invention is not limited to the configurations described in the following embodiment. Hereinafter, the switch device is described as a switch for starting and stopping an automobile engine. However, the switch device to which the present embodiment is applied is not limited to the switch for starting and stopping an automobile engine.
(8)
(9) The housing member 2 in
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14) Of two prongs of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B, a slope S1 is formed on the prong 5A at a portion abutting on the tab 6. Of the two prongs of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B, a slope S2 is formed on the prong 5B at a portion abutting on the tab 6. The slopes S1 and S2 are examples of a first slope. On the other hand, slopes S3 and S4 are formed on the tab 6 at portions abutting on the two prongs of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B. The slopes S3 and S4 are examples of a second slope. The slopes S1 and S2 are slopes that expand symmetrically in a direction in which the operation knob 3 is pushed, and when assuming the direction in which the operation knob 3 is pushed as a standard direction, are tilted at the same angle regarding the standard direction. The slopes S3 and S4 formed on the tab 6 narrow symmetrically in a direction opposite to the standard direction, and are tilted at the same angle regarding the standard direction. In the present embodiment, the tilt angle of the slopes S1 and S2 is different from the tilt angle of the slopes S3 and S4 regarding the standard direction. Therefore, when the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated, the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B and the tab 6 make a line contact first. In the example of
(15) As described above, when the pushing force on the operation knob 3 is released, the operation knob 3 is accelerated by the urging force of the spring 7. The tab 6 formed on the accelerated operation knob 3 abuts on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B. If the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated by a surface contact between the operation knob 3 and the housing member 2, and when the operation knob 3 make a surface contact vigorously with the housing member 2, the surfaces collide with each other and a large impact sound is generated. On the other hand, the present embodiment regulates the movement of the operation knob 3 by the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B by making the line contact with the tab 6 first. Even when the tab 6 vigorously comes into contact with the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B, the generated impact sound can be reduced compared to a case where the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated by the surface contact.
(16) Further, the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B and the tab 6 make the line contact with each other at the slopes formed on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B and the slopes formed on the tab 6. Since the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B and the tab 6, which make the line contact, are slopes, the force acting on the line contact portions can be alleviated when the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated. For example, if the portions of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B that make the line contact with the tab 6 are at right angle, these portions of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B receive a large force when the portions make the line contact with the tab 6. This increases damage of the portions where the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B make the line contact with the tab 6 and causes scratching or wearing at the line contact portions. In contrast, the present embodiment can reduce the damage, because the first and second slopes are both slopes, so that the force acting on the line contact portions can be alleviated.
(17) In the present embodiment, the tilt angles of the slopes S1 and S2 formed on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B are gentler than the tilt angles of the slopes S3 and S4 formed on the tab 6. Angles of the slopes S1 and S2 with respect to the direction in which the operation knob 3 is pushed (tilt angles of the slopes S1 and S2) are larger than the angles of the slopes S3 and S4 with respect to the direction in which the operation knob 3 is pushed (tilt angles of the slopes S3, S4). If the tilt angles of the slopes S1, S2 formed on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B are steep, the damage of the line contact portions of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B increases when the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B receives the tab 6. The present embodiment can reduce the damage because the tilt angles of the slopes S1, S2 formed on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B are gentler than the tilt angles of the slopes S3, S4 formed on the tab 6.
(18) As described above, the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated when the tab 6 abuts on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B which serves as the receiving portion. In the present embodiment, the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B has a higher flexibility than the tab 6. When the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated, the tab 6 abuts on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B. At this time, as shown in
(19) The two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B bends by the tab 6 when the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated, thus absorbing the impact of abutting when the tab 6 abuts on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B. Therefore, it is possible to further reduce the impact sound when the tab 6 abuts on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B. It should be noted that the flexibility of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B is preferably higher than that of the tab 6, but may be substantially equal to or lower than the flexibility of the tab 6. In this case, the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B which is made of resin also bends to some extent when abutting on the tab 6, so that the impact sound may be reduced to some extent.
(20) As described above, the tilt angles of the slopes S1 and S2 formed on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B are gentler than the tilt angles of the slopes S3 and S4 formed on the tab 6. In other words, the tilt angles of the slopes S3 and S4 formed on the tab 6 are steeper than the tilt angles of the slopes S1 and S2 formed on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B. Therefore, the tab 6 having the slopes both having a steep tilt angle and a low flexibility abuts on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B having the slopes of a gentle tilt angle and a high flexibility. As a result, the tab 6 can largely bend the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B and reduce the impact sound.
(21) As described above, when the tab 6 abuts on the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B, both prongs of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B bend. The two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B bends instantaneously, and then immediately return to the original state (unbent state). As a result, the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B can immediately regain its original function as the regulating portion.
(22) As described above, when the operation knob 3 returns to the original position by the urging force of the spring 7, the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated by the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B that makes the line contact with the tab 6 first. This allows reduction of the impact sound generated when the movement of the operation knob 3 is regulated.
(23) In the example described above, the slopes are formed on both prongs of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B and the tab 6, but the slopes may not be formed on either one of the two prongs of the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B and the tab 6. For example,
(24) Meanwhile, the two-pronged stopper 5A, 5B may not be formed on the housing member 2. For example,
(25) This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-041775 filed on Mar. 7, 2019 which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.