System and method for on demand production of custom indicator assays
11275977 · 2022-03-15
Assignee
Inventors
- Aleksandr E Miklos (Baldwin, MD, US)
- Gary K Kilper (Edgewood, MD, US)
- Charles E Davidson (Towson, MD, US)
- Christian J Whitchurch (Los Gatos, CA, US)
Cpc classification
G06F3/04847
PHYSICS
Y02A90/10
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
G16H10/40
PHYSICS
G06K15/1823
PHYSICS
International classification
G06F3/12
PHYSICS
Abstract
A system and method for on-demand production of custom indicator assays including a computing device for receiving a user specified analyte for which the assay will test, a database accessible via the computing device and containing indicator response data for a variety of analytes and potential interferents, and a printer operably connected to the computing device for printing an optimized combination of indicators onto a substrate based on the indicator response data of the database for a user specified analyte and any user specified potential interferents. The method includes receiving in a user interface at least one user specified analyte; querying the database to determine an optimized combination of indicators to test for the at least one user specified analyte; and printing from a printer the optimized combination of indicators onto a substrate.
Claims
1. A system for on-demand production of custom indicator assays, the system comprising: a computing device; a database accessible via the computing device, the database containing indicator response data for a plurality of analytes and potential interferents; and a printer operably connected to the computing device, the printer configured to print an optimized combination of indicators onto a substrate based on the indicator response data of the database for a user specified analyte and any user specified potential interferents.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the computing device is any one of a computer, a smart phone, or a tablet.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the computing device is configured to display a user interface.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the user interface allows a user to select any combination of a size, a shape, and a material of the substrate of the custom indicator assay.
5. The system of claim 3, wherein the user interface is a graphical user interface.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the graphical user interface allows a user to select the specified analyte for which the custom indicator assay will test and any potential interferents present in an environment in which the custom indicator assay will be used.
7. The system of claim 5, wherein the graphical user interface allows a user to select a form-factor of the custom indicator assay.
8. The system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of indicator-containing cartridges configured to be installed in the printer.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the printer is an inkjet printer.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the custom indicator assay is a color-changing indicator assay.
11. A method for on-demand production of custom indicator assays, the method comprising: receiving in a user interface at least one user specified analyte for which a custom indicator assay will test; querying a database containing indicator response data for a plurality of analytes and potential interferents to determine an optimized combination of indicators to test for the at least one user specified analyte; and printing from a printer the optimized combination of indicators onto a substrate.
12. The method of claim 11, further comprising, prior to printing, instructing the user to install a plurality of indicator-containing cartridges into the printer, the plurality of indicator-containing cartridges containing the indicators needed to create the optimized combination of indicators.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the user interface is presented to a user on a computing device.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the computing device is any one of computer, smart phone, or a tablet.
15. The method of claim 11, further comprising receiving in the user interface at least one user specified potential interferent that may be present in an environment in which the custom indicator assay will be used.
16. The method of claim 11, further comprising receiving in the user interface a user specified size of the custom indicator assay.
17. The method of claim 11, further comprising receiving in the user interface a user specified shape of the custom indicator assay.
18. The method of claim 11, further comprising receiving in the user interface a user specified substrate material of the custom indicator assay.
19. The method of claim 11, further comprising receiving in the user interface a user specified form-factor of the custom indicator assay.
20. The method of claim 11, wherein the optimized combination of indicators reduces the likelihood of a false-positive test for the user specified analyte as a result of potential interferents.
21. The method of claim 11, further comprising first building the database containing indicator response data for a plurality of analytes and potential interferents, wherein building the database comprises: exposing a plurality of indicators to a chemical library guided by an algorithm; imaging the exposed plurality of indicators to produce raw image data; analyzing the raw image data to develop indicator response data of each indicator of the plurality of indicators in response to each chemical of the chemical library; and inputting the indicator response data into the database.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The present invention is further detailed with respect to the following drawings that are intended to show certain aspects of the present invention but should not be construed as a limit on the practice of the present invention.
(2)
(3)
(4)
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(5) The present invention has utility as a system and method for on-demand production of custom color-changing indicator assays that are able to target a wide variety of analytes, avoid specified potential interferents, and are available in a customizable physical embodiment including shape, size, and material, while also reducing the likelihood of a false-positive test for the user specified analyte as a result of potential interferents. The present invention also has utility as high-speed, miniaturized, low-cost, and high-throughput solution for producing custom indicator assays and has important applicability in fields such as biosensing, drug screening, environmental monitoring, forensic investigation, and military defense.
(6) The present invention will now be described with reference to the following embodiments. As is apparent by these descriptions, this invention can be embodied in different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. For example, features illustrated with respect to one embodiment can be incorporated into other embodiments, and features illustrated with respect to a particular embodiment may be deleted from the embodiment. In addition, numerous variations and additions to the embodiments suggested herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the instant disclosure, which do not depart from the instant invention. Hence, the following specification is intended to illustrate some particular embodiments of the invention, and not to exhaustively specify all permutations, combinations, and variations thereof.
(7) It is to be understood that in instances where a range of values are provided that the range is intended to encompass not only the end point values of the range but also intermediate values of the range as explicitly being included within the range and varying by the last significant figure of the range. By way of example, a recited range of from 1 to 4 is intended to include 1-2, 1-3, 2-4, 3-4, and 1-4.
(8) Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention.
(9) Unless indicated otherwise, explicitly or by context, the following terms are used herein as set forth below.
(10) As used in the description of the invention and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(11) Also as used herein, “and/or” refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items, as well as the lack of combinations when interpreted in the alternative (“or”).
(12) As shown in
(13) According to some inventive embodiments, the computing device 20 is any of a computer, a smart phone, or a tablet. The computing device may be implemented as a mobile, wireless device such as a smart phone, a laptop, or a tablet, or may be implemented as a stationary device, such as a personal computer and the like. According to embodiments as shown in
(14) The details of the user interface are shown in
(15) According to certain inventive embodiments, a user is also able to specify the state of matter of the analyte sample, for example whether the sample is a liquid matter or a vapor matter, as shown in box 53 of the input user interface 50 of
(16) After the customization information has been entered by a user into the input user interface 50, an algorithm analyzes the input information and queries the database 30. The database 30 contains indicator response data for a variety of target analytes and potential interferents and is configured to algorithmically determine an optimized combination of indicators 42 to produce the desired custom assay to test for the user specified analyte while avoiding any potential interferents identified by the user. As shown in
(17) The algorithm process can be described as follows. When presented with a target analyte chemical (“analyte”) to detect and an interferent chemical one needs to distinguish and avoid false alarms from (“interferent”), the algorithm begins searching the database for indicators. The algorithm first looks for indicators that undergo a color change in response to the analyte, and begins to rank-order these color changes using a model for human color perception, such that the rankings correspond to how different the before and after colors for each indicator would look to a human observer. The same operation is performed for the interferent chemical. The algorithm then ranks these indicators again, this time considering the difference in response between the analyte and the interferent. The final step is to select the optimal indicators, typically two or more in order to provide robust discrimination. This selection is done by co-optimizing the raw color change magnitude (the first ranking) and the difference in color change between the analyte and interferent chemicals (the second ranking). Of course, the algorithm requires the color-change database and the user input to function, and there is an adjustable threshold value for the required color change magnitude which can be manipulated. The algorithm will always return the indicators with the most apparent color change and best available color change difference between the analyte and the interferent, but this value can be set to return a “no match” message to the user when the color changes found fall beneath the minimum change necessary to be observed by eye.
(18) For example, this algorithm has been demonstrated to generate a custom indicator assay capable of discriminating between two acids commonly used as food ingredients, i.e., ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) and malic acid (used as a coating for Sour Patch Kids). The user specified that one indicator should change for both compounds (so that they could ensure the paper substrate had been exposed) but that two of them should respond only to ascorbic acid. From a set of 18 indicators, the algorithm returned methyl Red, thionine, and a composition that contained both methylene green and neutral red. The first indicator (methyl red) started off as a golden yellow color but became bright red when exposed to either ascorbic or malic acid. Thionine starts off as a light blue color and remains so upon exposure to malic acid, but quickly loses all color upon exposure to ascorbic acid thereby producing a blue to white color transition. The methylene green and neutral red composition starts off a medium blue color, does not change for malic acid, and turns a reddish-purple color upon exposure to ascorbic acid. The assay tickets were marked with the instruction “ALL THREE MUST CHANGE” indicating that ascorbic acid is only identified if all three printed regions of the ticket changed color because of the specific indicators chosen. Thus, ascorbic acid can be differentiated from malic acid in a sample using this particular custom assay.
(19) The printer 40, which is operatively connected to the computing device 20, is configured to print the optimized combination of indicators 42, as determined by the algorithm and database 30 based on the indicator response data of the database 30 for a user specified analyte and any user specified potential interferents, onto a substrate 44. According to embodiments, the printer 40 is an inkjet printer. Inkjet printing is a dispensing methodology that is a gentle and straightforward solution-drop deposition technique, enabling fragile chemical and biological materials to be printed on substrates 44 of a multitude of materials, as described above. It is appreciated that a printer may be able to hold numerous cartridges that vary in indicators, in some inventive embodiments, there is no need for intermediate human intervention to load indicators.
(20) The present disclosure also provides a method 70 for on-demand production of custom indicator assays using the system described herein. According to embodiments, the method 70 begins by building the database 30 containing indicator response data for a variety of analytes and potential interferents is built, as shown in
(21) Once the database 30 has been built on the backend, the method for on-demand production of custom indicator assays continues on the front end when a user interacts with the input user interface 50 on the computing device 20. That is, the method 70 includes receiving in a user interface 50 at least one user specified analyte for which a custom indicator assay 12 will test. The method proceeds by querying the database 30 using an indicator selection algorithm at step 76 to determine an optimized combination of indicators to test for the at least one user specified analyte. According to embodiments, the method includes instructing the user to install indicator containing cartridges 46 into the printer 40, for example on an output user interface 60 as shown in
(22) Patent documents and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. These documents and publications are incorporated herein by reference to the same extent as if each individual document or publication was specifically and individually incorporated herein by reference.
(23) The foregoing description is illustrative of particular embodiments of the invention but is not meant to be a limitation upon the practice thereof. The following claims, including all equivalents thereof, are intended to define the scope of the invention.