HIGHLY POLARIZABLE METAL-FREE PEROVSKITE ELECTRO-OPTIC MATERIALS
20220098209 · 2022-03-31
Assignee
Inventors
- Meng-Jia SUN (Würzburg, DE)
- Chao ZHENG (Hamilton, CA)
- Sjoerd Hoogland (Toronto, CA)
- Edward Hartley Sargent (Toronto, CA)
Cpc classification
C30B7/14
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y02E10/549
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to highly polarizable 3D organic perovskites of the general formula ABX.sub.3, prepared by introducing halogen functional groups in the A-site cation (in which the A and B sites are occupied by organic cations and the X site is a monovalent non-metallic counterion). The (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 crystal exhibits a strong linear electrooptic (EO) effect with an effective EO coefficient of 20 pmV.sup.−1, which is 10 times higher than that of metal halide perovskites. These 3D organic perovskites are solution processed and compatible with silicon, and illustrate the potential of rationally-designed all-organic perovskites for use in on-chip modulators, electro-optic devices, piezoelectric devices, or silicon photonics devices.
Claims
1. A 3D organic perovskite having the Formula (I):
ABX.sub.3 (I) wherein: A has the formula DR.sup.2+, wherein DR.sup.2+ is: ##STR00003## wherein R is F, Cl, Br, CN, or OH; and R′ is H or CH.sub.3; B is NH.sub.4.sup.+; and X is BF.sub.4.sup.− or PF.sub.6.sup.−.
2. The organic perovskite of claim 1, wherein R is F or Cl.
3. The organic perovskite of claim 1 or 2, wherein X is BF.sub.4.sup.−.
4. The organic perovskite of claim 1, which is (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3.
5. The organic perovskite of claim 1, which is (DF)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3.
6. Use of a 3D organic perovskite as defined in any one of claims 1 to 5 in an electro-optic device or piezoelectric device.
7. Use of a 3D organic perovskite as defined in any one of claims 1 to 5 in a silicon photonics device.
8. A process for preparing 3D (DR)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 perovskite crystals, the process comprising the steps of: providing an aqueous solution of stoichiometric amounts of DR, wherein R is F or Cl, and NH.sub.4BF.sub.4 in excess HBF.sub.4; heating the solution to 80□ for 1 h; and cooling the solution to room temperature at a rate of 4 K/h to yield the perovskite crystals.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0029] Organic perovskites with the general formula ABX.sub.3 (in which the A and B sites are occupied by organic cations and the X site is a monovalent non-metallic counterion) have shown noncentrosymmetry induced by the A-site molecule where a functional group on the A-site molecule induces an asymmetry.
[0030] The 3D network of organic perovskites is composed of corner-sharing BX.sub.6 octahedra connected via noncovalent interactions with the A site occupying the octahedral cavities (Ref. 7). This materials system offers a means to construct noncentrosymmetric structures by molecular engineering of organic components.
[0031] The present invention relates to a new class of 3D organic (i.e., metal-free) perovskites where highly polarizable functional groups are incorporated into the A-site molecule. To enable fitting the large functional group in the perovskite scaffold, a larger X site species is used to increase the size of the A-site. The dipole moment of the resulting perovskite materials can be optimized by increasing the size of the functional group on the A site molecule.
[0032] The increased polarizability of the A-site molecule and the resulting organic perovskite material is demonstrated by the high electrooptic coefficient achieved by the resulting materials. Accordingly, the present invention relates the construction of stable, noncentrosymmetric EO-active organic perovskite materials through the selection of suitable A, B and X constituents.
[0033] Spontaneous polarization (P.sub.s)—a key consideration for determining the strength of the EO effect—depends on the dipole moment of the A site and its alignment in the cavity of the BX.sub.6 frameworks (Ref 10). Additionally, the noncovalent interactions between the A- and X-site constituents distort the BX.sub.6 octahedra and induce structural asymmetry, resulting in polarization. As a result, increasing the dipole moment of the A-site cation is a path towards increasing the total polarization in the crystal. This can be done by engineering the A-site cation with polarizable functional groups. As the size of the cavity of the BX.sub.6 framework is finite, only certain sizes of A-site cations can fit in the 3D perovskite scaffold.
[0034] In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a new class of organic perovskites is provided which overcomes the collapse of the 3D perovskite structure upon the addition of large A-site molecules.
[0035] The 3D organic perovskites of the present invention are solution-processed materials that can be readily integrated with silicon photonics. These organic perovskite systems are also very stable and can maintain their polarization over time. These 3D organic perovskites are suitable for use in on-chip modulators, electro-optic devices, piezoelectric devices, or silicon photonics devices.
[0036] In one embodiment, the present invention provides 3D organic perovskites having the Formula (I) ABX.sub.3, wherein A has the formula DR.sup.2+, wherein DR.sup.2+ is:
##STR00002##
wherein R is F, Cl, Br, CN, or OH; and R′ is H or CH.sub.3; B is NH.sub.4.sup.+; and X is BF.sub.4.sup.− or PF.sub.6.sup.−.
[0037] EO modulation has been observed in an organic perovskite: (DH)NH.sub.4I.sub.3, D=N-methyl-N′-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octonium (Ref 9). This material had N-methyl-N′-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octonium in the A-site, and this resulted in the noncentrosymmetry of the crystal.
[0038] To evaluate the performance of the organic perovskite materials, a series of organic perovskites employing the A-site cation DR.sup.2+ (D=N-methyl-N′-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octonium, R=H, F, Cl) were synthesized. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, one hydrogen atom on the N-methyl group was replaced with a larger, more polarizable halogen atom. The larger polarizability of the halogen atoms on the A-site cation can be expected to increase the molecular dipole strength.
[0039]
[0040] A series of three new 3D organic perovskites of the general formula of (DR)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 were synthesized, wherein BF.sub.4.sup.− was employed as the X-site counterion, and R is H, F or Cl.
[0041]
[0042] To prevent the collapse of the 3D framework for larger A-site cations, BF.sub.4.sup.− is used instead of I.sup.− as the X site, in accordance with the present invention.
[0043] The large radius of BF.sub.4.sup.− (232 pm) stabilizes the 3D structure for the highly polarizable Cl-substituted cation. Because the radius of a BF.sub.4.sup.− anion is larger than that of an I.sup.− anion, the volume of a resulting BX.sub.6 cage is large enough to accommodate the Cl, without compromising a crystal's stability.
[0044] Each cation is isolated in BX.sub.6 cages, which limits dipole-dipole interactions and so avoids the formation of centrosymmetric crystal packing present in other organic EO modulator materials.
[0045] The structural dimension evolution is in good agreement with the Goldschmidt's Tolerance Factor, namely
(R.sub.A+R.sub.x)=t√{square root over (2)}(R.sub.B+R.sub.X)
where R.sub.A, R.sub.B, and R.sub.X are the ionic radii for the corresponding ions and the tolerance factor must satisfy t≈1 (Ref. 12). For most 3D perovskites, it is found that 0.8≤t≤1.0.
[0046] Table 1 shows the Goldschmidt tolerance factors of six organic perovskite crystals. The effective diameter of a DR.sup.2+ cation can be defined as the distance between two atoms that are furthest apart, based on the single crystal structures.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 DH.sup.2+ (268 pm) DF.sup.2+ (274 pm) DCl.sup.2+ (299 pm) I.sup.− (220 pm) 0.98 0.99 1.04 BF.sub.4.sup.− (232 pm) 0.97 0.98 1.01
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Synthetic Methods
[0047] Synthesis of the A-site cation: DR.sup.2+ (R=H, F, Cl) cations were synthesized and characterized according to the methods disclosed by WO2014/68341, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety (Ref. 16). Briefly, N—N′-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octonium and methyl iodide were dissolved in acetone in a 1:1.1 mole ratio at room temperature, then the mixed solution was stabilized in the dark for 48 h. The resulting precipitate was collected by filtration and washed with a large amount of diethyl ether to afford high-yield (DH)I as transparent crystals. (DF)I and (DCl)Cl were prepared using the similar method by reacting N—N′-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octonium with fluoroiodomethane and dichoromethane, respectively.
[0048] Synthesis of the organic perovskites: Each of the crystals displayed in
[0049] The 3D (DR)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 crystals were prepared by adopting the step-cooling method by mixing stoichiometric amounts of DR and NH.sub.4BF.sub.4 in excess HBF.sub.4 aqueous solution in a 20 ml vial. The mixture was dissolved by heating it up to 80□ for 1 h. The clear solution was then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 4 K/h to yield centimeter-sized transparent crystals. The crystals of counterparts were prepared in a similar way, by using HI solution instead of HBF.sub.4 aqueous solution.
Example 2: X-Ray Crystallography
[0050] Single-crystal X-ray analysis: The structures of the organic perovskites were determined by powder- and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Depictions of the crystal structures are shown in
[0051] Single crystal structures were measured with Bruker Kappa APEX-DUO diffractometer equipped with a rotating anode with graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (Burker Triumph, λ=0.71073 Å). The structures were solved by SHLEXT and SHELXL-2016/6, respectively. The detailed crystal information is listed in Table 2.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Compound (DH)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 (DF)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 (DCl).sub.2(NH.sub.4).sub.3I.sub.7 CCDC 2006695 2006696 2006697 2006698 number Formula C.sub.7H.sub.20B.sub.3F.sub.12N.sub.3 C.sub.7H.sub.19B.sub.3F.sub.13N.sub.3 C.sub.7H.sub.19B.sub.3ClF.sub.12N.sub.3 C.sub.14H.sub.42Cl.sub.2I.sub.7N.sub.7 Formula 406.69 424.68 441.13 1267.74 weight Temperature 200 K 150 K 150 K 150 K Crystal Monoclinic Monoclinic Triclinic Orthorhombic system Space group P2.sub.1 P2.sub.1/c P1 P2.sub.12.sub.12.sub.1 a (Å) 9.9737 (3) 14.7383 (6) 7.3743 (3) 9.6861 (3) b (Å) 10.8062 (4) 10.2392 (4) 15.0001 (7) 14.4232 (4) c (Å) 14.5050 (5) 10.4862 (4) 15.0678 (7) 24.7146 (7) V (Å.sup.3) 1563.31 (9) 1567.54 (11) 1653.49 3452.74 (17) a (°) 90 90 88.773 90 b (°) 90.118 97.874 84.993 90 γ (°) 90 90 84.842 90 Z value 4 4 4 4 Density 1.728 1.800 1.772 2.439 (mg/m.sup.3) R1 (final) 0.0397 0.0377 0.0529 0.0126 wR2 (final) 0.0956 0.0921 0.1385 0.0285 R1 (all) 0.0496 0.0480 0.0551 0.0129 wR2 (all) 0.1001 0.0968 0.1413 0.0286
[0052] As seen in
[0053] The phase purity was also investigated with powder X-ray diffraction: the experimental (upper trace) and simulated (lower trace) powder X-ray diffraction were well-matched, which confirms that the crystal is in a single phase (
[0054] Strong second harmonic generation (SHG) signal for (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 (580) was observed at room temperature when the crystal powder was illuminated with a 1030 nm femtosecond laser, confirming the noncentrosymmetric structure of the crystal and its propensity for second-order optical nonlinearity (
[0055] The (NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.6 octahedra in crystals according to embodiments can be distorted with a distortion that can be calculated according to the following equation:
where d is the mean N ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ B distance and d.sub.n are the six N ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ B individual distances.
[0056] Table 3 summarizes the distortions of individual octahedra with crystal structures.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Δd.sub.1 Δd.sub.2 Δd.sub.3 Δd.sub.4 Δd.sub.avg (×10.sup.−4) (×10.sup.−4) (×10.sup.−4) (×10.sup.−4) (×10.sup.−4) (DH)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 1.850 0.684 1.267 (DF)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 1.420 4.021 2.721 (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 33.44 32.83 32.42 12.17 27.47
Example 4: Density Functional Theory
[0057] The molecular dipole moments of DR.sup.2+ cations were calculated by DFT calculation carried out in Gaussian09 package using the B3LYP functional. The electronic structures were optimized using 6-31G basis set. The crystal polarization calculations have been performed in the framework of DFT (Ref. 17) with Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation (Ref. 18) (GGA-PBE) for the exchange-correlation functional and GTH pseudopotentials (Ref. 19). Van der Waals correction is considered for all calculations at a DFT-D3 level (Ref. 20). The polarization calculations were performed using CP2K (Ref 21). An energy cutoff of 600 Ry was set for Gaussian basis sets with auxiliary planewave method. Geometry optimization was performed under BFGS algorithm. Berry phase approach was utilized to calculate system electric polarization (Ref. 22).
[0058] Density functional theory (DFT) was used to investigate the macroscopic polarization P.sub.s in the OP crystals. The P.sub.s depends primarily on the dipole ordering of the A-sites (Refs. 8, 10a). The molecular dipole moments and electrostatic potential maps of the A-site molecules were first calculated (
[0059]
[0060] When one H atom on DH.sup.2+ is replaced by a halogen atom (F and Cl), the dipole moments increase to 5.49 D for DF.sup.2+ and 8.17 D for DCl.sup.2+ (
[0061]
[0062]
[0063] As shown in
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067] The different packing behavior than the Cl derivative can be ascribed to the smaller size of F and its less distorted perovskite framework, allowing the molecules more freedom to rotate and align in an antiparallel fashion. By comparing the molecular dipole moments with the crystal P.sub.s (
[0068]
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073] Table 4 summarizes the results of DFT calculations for the spontaneous polarizations P.sub.s of crystals. The polar coordinates and polarization values for each crystal are listed.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 P.sub.s (μC x y z P.sub.s (Debye) cm.sup.−2).sup.a (DH)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 −0.0324 2.4187 −0.0965 2.4209 0.52 (DF)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 −1.5006 0.1396 −0.0975 1.5102 0.32 (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 −2.3624 −8.9472 9.0157 12.920 2.61 (DCl).sub.2(NH.sub.4).sub.3I.sub.7 −0.0269 −0.0359 0.0006 0.0448 0.0043 .sup.aP.sub.s(μC cm.sup.−2) = P.sub.s(Debye) × 3.3 × 10.sup.−30 C .Math. m/V.sub.cell
[0074] The linear EO effect is characterized by measuring the polarization change of a laser beam transmitted through the crystal as a function of applied electric field. The EO effect is given by the linear change of the refractive index with an applied electric field, E, expressed:
Δn=½r.sub.en.sup.3E
where r.sub.e is the effective EO coefficient when an electric field is applied. The EO coefficient of (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 was determined quantitatively at the standard telecom wavelength of 1550 nm using the modified Teng-Man technique (Ref. 14). A schematic of the experimental setup used is shown in
[0075]
[0076] The power of the transmitted light increased linearly as a function of the applied AC voltage (
where θ=45°, V.sub.ac=V.sub.pp sin θ, l.sub.lac is the amplitude of the modulated light intensity and is the half intensity of the maximum intensity of the output laser at the detector.
[0077] Using this method, the EO coefficient of (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 was found to be 20 pm V.sup.−1 at 1 kHz and was independent of the operating voltage (
[0078]
[0079] In summary, highly polarizable organic perovskites have been prepared by introducing halogen functional groups in the A-site cation. It has been demonstrated that the (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 crystal exhibits a strong linear EO effect with an effective EO coefficient of 20 pmV.sup.−1, which is 10 times higher than that of metal halide perovskites and is 1.5 fold enhancement compared to previously reported organic perovskites, (DH)(NH.sub.4)I.sub.3. By combining experimentally determined crystallographic information with DFT simulations, it was shown that the large EO response originates from the ability of the crystal to align large molecular dipoles within the 3D perovskite structure. Although the EO response of the organic perovskite (DCl)(NH.sub.4)(BF.sub.4).sub.3 approaches that of LiNbO.sub.3 (r.sub.eff≈30 pm V.sup.−1), the 3D organic perovskites of the present invention are more convenient to handle than LiNbO.sub.3, as they are solution processed and compatible with silicon. These findings highlight the potential of rationally-designed all-organic perovskites for use in on-chip modulators.
[0080] Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific features and embodiments thereof, it is evident that various modifications and combinations can be made thereto without departing from the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded simply as an illustration of the invention as defined by the appended claims, and are contemplated to cover any and all modifications, variations, combinations or equivalents that fall within the scope of the present invention.
REFERENCES
[0081] [1] a) E. L. Wooten, K. M. Kissa, A. Yi-Yan, E. J. Murphy, D. A. Lafaw, P. F. Hallemeier, D. Maack, D. V. Attanasio, D. J. Fritz, G. J. McBrien, D. E. Bossi, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2000, 6, 69; b) I. S. Amiri, S. R. B. Azzuhri, M. A. Jalil, H. M. Hairi, J. Ali, M. Bunruangses, P. Yupapin, Micromachines 2018, 9, 452. [0082] [2] a) C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. S. Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, M. M. Lončar, Nature 2018, 562, 101; b) A. D. Dupuy, Y. Kodera, J. E. Garay, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 7970; c) Y. Gao, G. Walters, Y. Qin, B. Chen, Y. Min, A. Seifitokaldani, B. Sun, P. Todorovic, M. I. Saidaminov, A. Lough, S. Tongay, S. Hoogland, E. H. Sargent, Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1808336. [0083] [3] a) R. S. Weis, T. K. Gaylord, Appl. Phys. A 1985, 37, 191; b) S. Abel, F. Eltes, J. E. Ortmann, A. Messner, P. Castera, T. Wagner, D. Urbonas, A. Rosa, A. M. Gutierrez, D. Tulli, P. Ma, B. Baeuerle, A. Josten, W. Heni, D. Caimi, L. Czornomaz, A. A. Demkov, J. Leuthold, P. Sanchis, J. Fompeyrine, Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 42. [0084] [4] a) S. Abel, T. Stoferle, C. Marchiori, C. Rossel, M. D. Rossell, R. Erni, D. Caimi, M. Sousa, A. Chelnokov, B. J. Offrein, J. Fompeyrine, Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1671; b) L. Chen, R. M. Reano, Opt. Express 2012, 20, 4032. [0085] [5] a) S. R. Marder, L.-T. Cheng, B. G. Tiemann, A. C. Friedli, M. Blanchard-Desce, J. W. Perry, J. Skindhøj, Science 1994, 263, 511; b) L. R. Dalton, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2003, 15, R897; c) S. R. Marder, B. Kippelen, A. K.-Y. Jen, N. Peyghambarian, Nature 1997, 388, 845. [0086] [6] L. R. Dalton, A. W. Harper, B. H. Robinson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 4842. [0087] [7] C. A. Bremner, M. Simpson, W. T. A. Harrison, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10960. [0088] [8] H.-Y. Ye, Y.-Y. Tang, P.-F. Li, W.-Q. Liao, J.-X. Gao, X.-N. Hua, H. Cai, P.-P. Shi, Y.-M. You, R.-G. Xiong, Science 2018, 361, 151. [0089] [9] Y. Gao, S. M. Alsadat, A. Johnston, C. Zheng, G. Walters, Q. Feng, X. Wang, M.-J. Sun, A. M. Najarian, D. Xue, Y.-K. Wang, M. I. Saidaminov, O. Voznyy, S. Hoogland, E. H. Sargent, Electro-optic Modulation using Metal-free Perovskites, paper in submission. [0090] [10] a) H. Wang, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Lv, T. Li, W. Ju, H. Li, X. Cai, H. Han, npj Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 17; b) F. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 9733. [0091] [11] a) H.-Y. Zhang, Y.-Y. Tang, P.-P. Shi, R.-G. Xiong, Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 1928; b) Y. Ai, X.-G. Chen, P.-P. Shi, Y.-Y. Tang, P.-F. Li, W.-Q. Liao, R.-G. Xiong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4474. [0092] [12] V. M. Goldschmidt, Naturwissenschaften 1926, 14, 477. [0093] [13] a) M. W. Lufaso, P. M. Woodward, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 2004, 60, 10; b) Alonso, J.; b) M. Martinez-Lope, M. Casais, M. Fernandez-Diaz, Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 917. [0094] [14] a) C. C. Teng, H. T. Man, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1990, 56, 1734; b) Y. Shuto, M. Amano, J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 77, 4632. [0095] [15] a) J. L. Casson, K. T. Gahagan, D. A. Scrymgeour, R. K. Jain, J. M. Robinson, V. Gopalan, R. K. Sander, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2004, 21, 1948; b) A. Yariv, P. Yeh, Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications, Oxford University Press, UK 2007. [0096] [16] G. Veronique, S. Graham, (Oxford University Innovation) U.K. WO2014/68341, 2014. [0097] [17] W. Kohn, L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133. [0098] [18] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [0099] [19] S. Goedecker, M. Teter, J. Hutter, Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 1703. [0100] [20] S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104 [0101] [21] a) B. G. Lippert, J. H. Parrinello, Michele, Mol. Phys. 1997, 92, 477; b) J. VandeVondele, M. Krack, F. Mohamed, M. Parrinello, T. Chassaing, J. Hutter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 2005, 167, 103; c) J. Hutter, M. Iannuzzi, F. Schiffmann, J. VandeVondele, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 15. [0102] [22] S. Luber, J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 234110.