Hammer extension for a muzzle loading firearm
11306988 · 2022-04-19
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F41A19/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F41A19/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A hammer extension design for use with various firearms, including specifically muzzle-loading firearms, that makes operating the hammer easier, faster, and safer. The present invention discloses a muzzle-loading firearm which includes a stock, a barrel fastened to said stock, a pivot mounted to said stock, a trigger and hammer mechanism comprising of a hammer and a lever arm both secured to said pivot.
Claims
1. A muzzle-loading firearm comprising: a stock; a barrel fastened to said stock, said barrel having a chamber end and a muzzle end, wherein said chamber end has a touch hole or a nipple; an action pivot affixed to said stock, wherein said action pivot may be rotated to an engaged position or a fired position; a hammer affixed to said action pivot; said hammer having a generally elongated body and a first and second end at respective ends of said body, and having a first central axis defused by an imaginary line extending along said body and aligned with both said first and said second ends, wherein said first end is secured to said action pivot and said second end contacts a frizzen or a primer cap when in said tired position; a hammer extension having an L shape body with a central pivot point, a first and a second end at respective ends of said body, wherein said pivot point is secured with said hammer to said action pivot and said first end engages with said hammer and said second end provides leverage for rotating said action pivot between said fired position and said engaged position.
2. The muzzle-loading firearm recited in claim 1, wherein said hammer extension is positioned relative to said stock such that the user has an unobstructed view along the length of said barrel.
3. The muzzle-loading firearm recited in claim 1, wherein said action pivot is in said engaged position when said second end of the hammer extension is in a direction parallel to said barrel.
4. The muzzle-loading firearm recited in claim 1, wherein said action pivot is in said fired position when said second end of the hammer extension is in a direction perpendicular to said barrel.
5. The muzzle-loading firearm recited in claim 1, wherein said second end of the hammer, said action pivot, and said second end of the hammer extension form a V-shape.
6. The muzzle loading firearm recited in claim 5 wherein the angle of said V-shape is about 90°.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(8) The invention is one piece. It is shown in the drawings as intended for a right handed firearm, but could also be manufactured for a left handed firearm.
(9) In order to provide an understanding of the invention and its versatility. I will provide some explanation of what differentiates the traditional muzzle loader from others. Traditional muzzle loaders use a lock action and are a more primitive type of muzzle loading firearm. The muzzle loading firearm, whether a traditional model or a more modern type, are loaded from the muzzle end of the barrel, where the bullet exits. To load or reload the gun, one must pour a measured amount of black powder into the barrel, and then force a lead ball or a bullet down the barrel into the firing chamber of the barrel using a ram rod that is stored in a channel under the barrel of the firearm. The bullet is then tapped tight against the powder with the ram rod. The black powder in a muzzle loading firearm is referral to as the charge, and is what propels the projectile out of the muzzle end of the barrel. The firing chamber is at the end of the barrel opposite the muzzle, and contains the charge. This method of loading the firearm is what defines the muzzle loader. The traditional muzzle loading firearms can be found in rifle and pistol form. My invention can be used on both rifles and pistols of any traditional lock type muzzle loaders.
(10) The means of igniting the charge is what differentiates the traditional muzzle loaders. There are several methods in which lock type firearms can ignite the charge, from a match striking a surface to a surface striking a primer cap. Whatever the method of ignition the lock action employs, the lock action consists of a striking hammer mounted to a pivot that is spring loaded and, when manually pulled rearward or “cocked”, is held in place by an internal mechanism. A trigger releases the cocked hammer, thus providing the force needed for whatever means of ignition to occur. However, when the user wishes to disengage the firearm without firing it, he must control the tension on the hammer while pulling the trigger, so as not to allow the hammer to create spark and unintentionally lire the weapon.
(11) The most commonly used of the traditional muzzle loading firearms are the percussion caplock and the flintlock. It is because these two types of traditional muzzle loaders are most common that I have used them in my drawings to describe how my invention improves the ergonomics and the safe use of the traditional form of muzzle loading firearm. My drawings also provide an understanding of the versatility of the invention in its capability of being used on any type of lock action firearm, and not being limited to one particular type.
(12) A caplock firearm is considered ready to fire only when the charge has been loaded into the firing chamber of the barrel, and a cap has been placed on the nipple. A flintlock firearm is considered ready to fire only when the charge has been loaded into the firing chamber of the barrel, and a small amount of black powder is placed in a flash pan. The sparks from the flint alone will not ignite the charge inside the firing chamber of the barrel. Therefore a small amount of black powder must be placed in the flash pan located at the chamber end of the barrel in order to produce a sufficient source of ignition. This makes the flintlock a less reliable means of ignition than the caplock. However, certain states in the U.S. may only allow certain types of muzzle loading firearms to be used to harvest game. Below is further description of how the caplock firearm and the flintlock firearm differ, and how the invention can be applied to each.
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19) The invention improves the ergonomics of the firearm by reducing the distance the user's thumb needs to engage the hammer, and by substantially reducing the force needed by the thumb to activate the hammer, as the extension arm provides more leverage. Furthermore, the unique design of the invention allows it to be used on any type of lock action firearm, making it a versatile accessory for the muzzle loading firearm user.