TESTING OF MICROELECTRONICS DEVICE AND METHOD
20220099734 · 2022-03-31
Assignee
Inventors
- TODD ERIC CHORNENKY (Carmichaels, PA, US)
- JAMES ROBERT UPLINGER, II (CRANBERRY TWP, PA, US)
- Andrew Richard Portune (Oakdale, PA, US)
- WALTER J. KELLER, III (BRIDGEVILLE, PA, US)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A device and method to test microelectronic parts to determine whether the parts are compromised by active illumination in a testing fixture by analysis of emission metrics.
Claims
1. An apparatus for determining a state and/or condition and/or reliability of an unpowered microelectronic part specimen under test (PSUT) using active illumination, comprising: a transmission chain; a testing fixture having a capacitive member, the capacitive member is connected to the transmission chain; an input and output RF voltage line connected to the capacitive member having current when testing the PSUT; a testing fixture positioned near the capacitive member receiving the PSUT; a shielded enclosure around the testing fixture having an interior and exterior; a receiving antenna positioned within the interior of the enclosure; a receiving chain connected to the receiving antenna; and a signature analyzer.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said transmission chain has: a function generator; a RF amplifier connected to the signal generator; and at least one filter connected to the RF amplifier.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the receiving chain has one or a more of a high pass, low pass, band-reject, and band filters, amplifier, and sensitive receiver.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the PSUT is connected to a one or more of a of a ground and clock source.
5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the capacitive member has at least two (2) capacitive plates each separately having an RF voltage line, when RF voltage is applied there is an electric field between the capacitive plates.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a processing unit and a memory unit are connected to each other and to the signature analyzer.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a processing unit and a memory unit are connected to each other and to the analyzer, the processing unit, the memory unit storing an RF spectrum signature database of one or more uncompromised microelectronic parts and the processing unit having one or more algorithms to validate the presence of emission spectra of the part by comparing the algorithmic solutions to metrics evaluated against the emission spectra from the microelectronic part and reporting whether the microelectronic part is compromised and/or degraded and/or unreliable.
8. A fixture for testing microelectronic part specimen under test (PSUT) comprising: at least one capacitive member layer having two capacitive plates with AC voltage; and RF voltage supplies of opposite phase connected to each capacitive member.
9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein said fixture has more than one capacitive member.
10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein capacitive plates at least one capacitive member each capacitive member having two capacitive plates, each capacitive plate connected to an RF voltage supply, the RF voltage supply of one of the capacitive plates is of opposite phase to the other capacitive plate, the capacitive plates are positioned at a predetermined angle to each other.
11. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein capacitive plates at least one capacitive member having two capacitive plates, each capacitive plate connected to an RF voltage supply, the RF voltage supply of one of the capacitive plates is of opposite phase to the other capacitive plate, the capacitive plates are positioned at a predetermined angle to each other.
12. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the testing fixture has: two (2) layers, the first layer having the capacitive member and a layer adjacent to the capacitive member having a cavity to receive the PSUT.
13. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein said capacitive member has: at least one capacitive member having two (2) generally flat plates positioned at a predetermined distance from each other having an upper side and a lower side with AC voltage supplies of opposite phase connected to each plate; and an electrical insulator on the side of the capacitive member between the capacitive plates and the PSUT.
14. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the capacitive member has: at least one capacitive member having two (2) generally flat plates positioned at a predetermined distance from each other and a predetermined angle relative to each other having an upper side and a lower side with AC voltage supplies of opposite phase connected to each plate; and insulating tape attached to each of the capacitive plates on the side of each the capacitive plates between the capacitive plates and the PSUT.
15. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the fixture has: two layers, the lower layer having the capacitive member and the upper layer having a cavity to receive the PSUT.
16. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein fixture has: a ferrite core and at least one capacitive member each capacitive member one of fixed and movable.
17. A method to analyze microelectronic part specimen under test (PSUT comprising: a. inducing current in the PSUT by illumination with inductive coupling, energizing the PSUT; b. acquiring the unintended emission signature of the PSUT that has been energized; c. compilation of an algorithmic analysis of an emission signature into a metric dataset; d. determining the PDFs for each of said emission signature metrics; and e. comparing said metric PDF between said emission populations to the metric PDF of one or more exemplary parts.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the step of acquiring an emission signature is repeated for a predetermined number of repetitions or for a predetermined period of time.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein the comparison of the metric PDF are changes to the standard deviation, median, mean, and/or shape of the PSUT compared to the metric PDFs of one or more exemplary parts.
20. The method of claim 17, wherein changes to the standard deviation, median, mean, and/or shape of the metric PDFs of the part compared to the metric PDFs of one or more exemplary parts are used to determine physical differences between the PSUT and one or more exemplary parts.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
[0031] The following detailed description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the claimed invention to the described examples or uses of the described examples. As used herein, the words “example” or “illustrative” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” The implementations described below are implementations provided to enable persons skilled in the art to make or use the embodiments of the disclosure and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure or claims. For purposes of the description herein, the terms “upper”, “lower”, “left”, “rear”, “right”, “front”, “vertical”, “horizontal”, “exterior”, “interior”, and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in the Figures. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, or the following detailed description. It is also to be understood that the specific devices and processes illustrated in the attached drawings, and described in the following specification, are simply examples of the inventive concepts defined in the appended claims. Hence specific dimensions and other physical characteristics relating to the examples disclosed herein are not to be considered as limiting, unless the claims expressly state otherwise.
[0032] The terms and words used in the following description and claims are not limited to the bibliographical meanings, but, are merely used by the applicant to enable a clear and consistent understanding of the inventions. Accordingly, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the following description of exemplary embodiments of the invention are provided for illustration purposes only and not for the purpose of limiting the invention as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
[0033] It is to be understood that the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” includes the plural unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a circuit board” includes reference to one or more of such circuit board.
[0034] It is to be understood that a compromised or modified device specimen, PSUT, or microelectronic refers to a device specimen which has been modified to have reduced functionality, has been aged, offers reduced reliability for its intended use, or has been modified for functionality other than the original manufacturer's intended use of the device. A compromised or modified device specimen also includes counterfeit devices that may not function according to the original manufacturer's intended use or specified operational ranges such as temperature, voltage, power dissipation, or frequency ranges.
[0035] It is to be understood that an unmodified PSUT, or microelectronic part includes a part specimen that has not been modified from its original manufacturer's intent in bit, byte, or word patterns in software, firmware, or programmable hardware, or by other changes such as Focused Ion Beam (FIB) circuit editing to alter the devices' functionality. It also has not been substantially aged beyond the expectations of the user. Unmodified also means uncompromised.
[0036] The forgoing description will be focused on emission of unintended electromagnetic energy and, more particularly, the emission of unintended electromagnetic energy being in a RF spectrum, which is typically referred to in the art as frequencies below 300 GHz, although infrared, infrasonic and other emissions are also contemplated by the exemplary embodiments. They are unintended in the sense that the manufacturer and designer did not intentionally design the device to create those emissions and had not originally intended to use those emissions. They are derived as unintentional, harmless artifacts of the design and manufacture process.
[0037] It is to be understood that an unintended electromagnetic emission signature, RF signature, spectral signature element, spectral signature, signature element, RF emission signature, or emission signature refers to the frequency domain spectral features that are used herein to uniquely identify the hardware and/or software configuration of a device. An emission signature is comprised of one or more signature elements that each having one or more of a frequency position, amplitude, phase, and/or shape.
[0038] It is to be understood that non-linear attachments, non-linear mixing products, or side-band features are comprised of the one or more frequency domain spectral signature representations of frequency mixing products on a carrier frequency. Non-linear attachments can be symmetrically or asymmetrically distributed around a central emission signature, with greater or lesser amplitude than the central emission signature.
[0039] It is to be understood that a non-harmonically related signature element is one or more signature elements that originates from a different process, computation, electronic component, or subcomponent than a reference signature element. The relationship between two non-harmonically related signature elements can be quantified by one or more of frequency separation, amplitude, and/or shape.
[0040] It is to be understood that an emission signature metric, signature metric, or metric refers to the results of algorithms used to uniquely identify RF spectral emission signature features. An emission signature is includes, but is not limited to, the absolute frequency of the signature element, the shape of a signature element, the frequency spacing between signature elements, the Bessel parameters of non-linear attachments to a signature element, the shape of an envelope formed by non-linear attachments to a signature element, the number of signature elements, and/or the number of non-linear attachments to a signature element. A typical signature element may be characteristic of one or more spectral peaks within a spectrum, said spectral peak or peaks with associated frequencies, dB levels, shape, or phase noise characteristics. Also, a typical signature element may have characteristics of one or more spectral peaks within a spectrum, said spectral peak or peaks with associated frequencies, dB levels, shape, or phase noise characteristics.
[0041] It is to be understood that active illumination, illumination, and RF illumination refers to electromagnetic energy directed at a device specimen from an antenna, and/or capacitive plates. The directed electromagnetic energy is used to energize the PSUT to eliciting an electromagnetic emission having an RF emission signature.
[0042] It is to be understood that a signature database is a collection of files, lists, or instructions that are unique to specific microelectronic parts, devices, and/or components. A signature database file, signature file, or metric file contains instructions for one or more of specific frequencies, frequency ranges, Resolution Band Widths (RBWs), algorithms, algorithm parameters, signal processing parameters, analysis processing instructions for a unique part in order to perform signature metric analysis on unintended RF emissions, and/or probability density functions (PDFs) of one or more exemplary PSUTs. A signature file contains the information needed to acquire spectral emissions that can be used to uniquely identify the part or device using signal processing and algorithmic solutions to quantify and compare emission spectra from a PSUT to one or more exemplary PSUTs or devices.
[0043] It is to be understood that an algorithmic solution, or algorithmic analysis is the result from an algorithm that has been processed for a spectral emission signature based on specified algorithm, algorithm parameters, and/or signal processing parameters. An algorithmic solution is unique to a specified signature metric for a defined spectral emission signature in a specified frequency region of interest.
[0044] The emphasis of microelectronic analysis has been on determining the authenticity of the device specimen, with no emphasis on the determination of how well an authentic device will function. The technical problem is to take emission spectral measurements and provide relative reliability assessments of device specimens that have been in long term storage, reworked by the manufacture, salvaged from other boards, used under out-of-manufacturer-specified conditions, or reused from other applications. The technical solution is to repeatedly acquire emissions spectra, analyze the distribution of quantitative metrics of the spectral features, and compare the distributions to those of known reliable components. The emission spectra will be generated, measured, and analyzed in a complete system described herein.
[0045] The system acquires valuable characteristic features embedded in parts such as integrated circuits' and other microelectronics' unintended RF emissions. By examining the unintended emissions, it is possible to identify PSUTs that are counterfeit, damaged, aged extensively, compromised, or operating out of the manufacturers specified performance. PSUTs can also be compromised by physical-cyber and cyber-attacks. By using active illumination, it is possible to energize the PSUTs without connecting the PSUT to an assembly or subassembly. Connecting the PSUT is typically time-consuming. A more general engagement permits covering a diverse range of parts package and pin physical construction may be made without requiring the exact pin socket configuration, voltages, and currents at specific pins to be configured in a hardware board that is specific to the PSUT. Energizing the PSUT without connecting it allows for examination of physical or cyber exploits and other compromises in the PSUT that remain dormant during nominal operational conditions. Trojan, cloaked, or dormant cyber exploits are more difficult to discover than the physical anomalies in a connected PSUT.
[0046] Capacitive plates are used to stimulate the PSUT, contacting the non-conducting chip top parallel to the plates' surface. The capacitive plates establish an electrical field that induces a current in the conductors within the die, the circuit components, or the conductive interconnects.
[0047] Turning to
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051] The capacitive plates 360 may be electrically insulated from the part 330. The preferred embodiment is to cover the side of the capacitive plates 360 nearest the part with an electrically insulating tape 320, preferably an adhesive electrically insulating tape 320. The PSUT 330 is received by the test fixture 300 generally near or adjacent to the insulating tape 320. The tape 320 is not always necessary, as some parts such as DIP packaged parts may be placed with their non-conducting top surface upside down on the test fixture 300 and their pins not come in electrical contact with the capacitive plates 360. This is a typical test configuration for such parts. However, the tape prevents damage to a chip if an operator inadvertently places it in the wrong orientation. Some parts have rounded pins on the side, or conductive metal plates on the top surface necessitating the tape to prevent electrical contact with the plates 360. When energized by the field generated by the capacitive plates 360, the PSUT 360 emits an unintended RF emission analog signal 340.
[0052]
[0053] The transmit chain, 400, has a function generator 420, that is connected to a signal generator 425, that is connected to an RF amplifier 430 that is connected to one or more filters 435. Preferably the one or more filters 435 are one or a combination of a low pass, high pass, and bandpass filters.
[0054] The output of one or more filters 435 are connected to capacitive plates 445. The capacitive plates 445 are preferably arranged as shown in
[0055] The receive chain 405 has one or more filters 440. Preferably the one or more filters are one or more of a high pass, lowpass, bandpass, and band-reject filters. A signal analyzer 410 is connected to the output of filters 440. The receiver and signal analyzer 410 are also referred to as the RF Receiver and Analyzer Unit 410. The receiver is preferably a sensitive RF receiver with a sensitivity of −170 dBm.
[0056] The signal collection and analysis system 410 is connected to the receive chain. The signal collection and analysis system has a signature analyzer spectrum analyzer, processing unit to compare spectrum metrics to acquired spectrums, and a memory unit for storage of a signature database. A spectrum analyzer is one type of signature analyzer as used in this application. In another embodiment the memory unit retains the acquired spectrum. The signature database contains information on spectrum metrics are a suite of metrics such as peak frequency separation, peak location distribution, peak frequency and amplitude separation distance, degree of curve fit, and spectrum shape. The spectrum of an uncompromised part, component or subcomponent is initially acquired and a signature database file is created that resides on the memory unit. The advantage is that the spectrum metrics allow for examination and comparison of exemplary parts with test PSUTs on multiple frequency bands and multiple spectrum features for purposes of comparison.
[0057]
[0058]
[0059] The wired connection to the capacitive plates 540 is not shown in
[0060] The tomography plate 545 may share the RF illumination signal with capacitive plates 540 using a splitter such as a 2-way RF splitter. The tomography plate 545 may share the Signal Collection and Analysis System 410 using splitter such as a 2-way RF splitter.
[0061]
[0062] The difference between this embodiment 555 and the embodiment in
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068] Step 810 is the acquisition of the emission signature by the analysis unit. The frequency domain RF signature is captured in one or more ROIs (Regions Of Interest) with unique RF metric content as specified by the signature database file for the unique PSUT.
[0069] Step 820 compiles a metric dataset from the algorithms and algorithmic solutions specified in the signature database file. The algorithms specified by the signature database file are analyzed using the parameters specified by the signature database file on a ROI by ROI basis. The resulting algorithmic solutions are compiled for each acquisition into an aggregate for each ROI.
[0070] Step 830 determines PDFs of the PSUT based on the compiled algorithmic solutions aggregated in step 820. The kernel density estimator determines the PDF for each emission signature metric in each frequency ROI.
[0071] Step 840 performs a comparative analysis. The comparative analysis compares the metric PDF between the one or more exemplary parts and the PSUT for result analysis. Typically, a broadening of the PDF for a given metric, i.e. increased standard deviation, indicates reduced reliability as there is increased variability in the part's operation. A shift in the PDF mean or median indicates that there is a change in the part's performance or behavior. A change in shape of the PDF typically indicates that the metric is multi-modal, and the emission spectra has more than one preferred emission signature.
[0072] Typically, Step 810 is performed for a set number of acquisitions or for a set duration of time. This can be modified by user input to the analysis unit. Multiple measurements are used to raise the signal to noise ratio by combining the acquired signals and to increase statistical certainty.
[0073] The repeated step 810 can be done a fixed number of times, can be arranged to repeat the measurement for a fixed period of time, or repeated until a certainty threshold has been reached, which is especially applicable for borderline parts.
[0074]
[0075] Step 860 shows the method of extracting a PSUT metric database. Step 860 consists of one or more of steps to collect multiple spectral emission signature acquisitions for each ROI identified in step 850 from one or more exemplary PSUTs, determination of the algorithmic solution for each acquisition for each identified metric, compilation of aggregated algorithmic solutions for each identified metric, and/or compilation of statistical parameters of aggregated algorithmic solutions for each identified metric. Multiple acquisitions of the spectral emission signature for each ROI is required for reliable statistical analysis. Typically, a minimum of thirty (30) acquisitions are required for reliable analysis.
[0076] Step 870 shows the method of determining the exemplary part probability density functions for each metric identified for each ROI identified in step 850. Step 870 consist of one or more of steps to statistically analyze the aggregated algorithmic solutions for each identified metric for each ROI identified in step 850. The statistical analysis can include one or more of the parameters of mean, median, standard deviation, amplitude, curve fitting parameters, and/or shape of the distribution.
[0077] Step 880 shows the method of saving the exemplary PSUT PDF to the signature database on the signal analyzer memory. Step 880 consists of propagating one or more files containing PDFs, aggregated algorithmic solutions of one or more metrics, and/or characteristic statistical classifiers of aggregated algorithmic solutions of one or more metrics to the memory of the signal analyzer.
[0078] Although specific advantages have been enumerated above, various embodiments may include some, none, or all of the enumerated advantages. Other technical advantages may become readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after review of the following figures and description. It should be understood at the outset that, although exemplary embodiments are illustrated in the figures and described below, the principles of the present disclosure may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or not. The present disclosure should in no way be limited to the exemplary implementations and techniques illustrated in the drawings and described below.
[0079] Unless otherwise specifically noted, articles depicted in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
[0080] Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the systems, apparatuses, and methods described herein without departing from the scope of the disclosure. For example, the components of the systems and apparatuses may be integrated or separated. Moreover, the operations of the systems and apparatuses disclosed herein may be performed by more, fewer, or other components and the methods described may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order.
[0081] To aid the Patent Office and any readers of any patent issued on this application in interpreting the claims appended hereto, applicants wish to note that they do not intend any of the appended claims or claim elements to invoke 35 U.S.C. 112(f) unless the words “means for” or “step for” are explicitly used in the particular claim.