Tableted cannabinoid chewing gum with layered structure
11833117 · 2023-12-05
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61K31/352
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A23G4/12
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A23G4/20
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A23V2002/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A23G4/10
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A23G4/12
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A23G4/20
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
A tableted chewing gum composition for oral administration of cannabinoids includes a plurality of particles, including a first population of particles having water-insoluble gum base and a second population of particles having water-soluble chewing gum ingredients. The composition constitutes at least two layers, where a first layer of the composition has water-insoluble gum base and a second layer of the composition, which is cohered to and adjacent to the first layer, has water-soluble chewing gum ingredients. The second layer is free of water-insoluble gum base, and the composition includes one or more cannabinoids.
Claims
1. A pressed chewing gum tablet comprising a plurality of particles, including a first population of particles comprising water-insoluble gum base and a second population of particles comprising water-soluble chewing gum ingredients, and the pressed chewing gum tablet constituting at least two layers, wherein a) a first layer of the pressed gum tablet comprises water-insoluble gum base and b) a second layer of the pressed chewing gum tablet, which is cohered to and adjacent to the first layer, comprises water-soluble chewing gum ingredients, the second layer being free of water-insoluble gum base, and wherein the pressed chewing gum tablet comprises one or more cannabinoids.
2. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the pressed shewing gum tablet consists of two layers.
3. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of the first layer relative to the second layer is from 1:10 to 10:1.
4. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of the first layer relative to the second layer is from 1:2 to 2:1.
5. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the pressed chewing gum tablet consists of three layers where the first layer is the middle layer, and the second layer is cohered to and adjacent to one side of the first layer, and a third layer is cohered to and adjacent to the opposite side of the first layer.
6. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 5, wherein the weight ratio of the first layer relative to the second layer relative to the third layer is from 1:5:5 to 10:1:1.
7. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 5, wherein the weight ratio of the first layer relative to the second layer relative to the third layer is from 1:3:3 to 3:1:1.
8. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the pressed chewing gum tablet consists of three layers where the second layer is the middle layer, and the first layer is cohered to and adjacent to one side of the second layer, and a third layer is cohered to and adjacent to the opposite side of the second layer.
9. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is present in the first population of particles comprising water-insoluble gum base.
10. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is located in the first layer of the chewing gum composition.
11. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the content of water-insoluble gum base of the first layer is more than 30% by weight of the first layer.
12. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the content of water-soluble chewing gum ingredients of the second layer is more than 50% by weight of the second layer.
13. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the gum base comprising one or more natural resins in an amount of 10-40% by weight of the gum base, one or more elastomers in an amount of 3-30% by weight of the gum base, and one or more elastomer plasticizers in an amount of 8-50% by weight of the gum base.
14. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the water-soluble chewing gum ingredients comprise one or more sugar alcohols or one or more sugars in an amount of 35-80% by weight of the tablet.
15. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is present in a premixture with one or more sugar alcohols, one or more sugars or one or more microcrystalline species.
16. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids comprises at least one phytocannabinoid that is contained in a cannabinoid extract when incorporated in the tablet.
17. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids comprises at least two cannabinoids.
18. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is selected from the group consisting of a phytocannabinoid, an endocannabinoid and a synthetic cannabinoid.
19. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids comprises palmitoylethanolamide.
20. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is located in a protein carrier.
21. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is part of a self-emulsifying drug delivery system.
22. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is selected from the group consisting of cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), cannabidivarin (CBDV), salts and derivatives thereof.
23. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is selected from the group consisting of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), salts and derivatives thereof.
24. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the one or more cannabinoids is selected from the group consisting of cannabichromene (CBC), cannabichromenic acid (CBCV), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabigerol propyl variant (CBGV), cannabicyclol (CBL), cannabinol (CBN), cannabinol propyl variant (CBNV), cannabitriol (CBO), and tetrahydrocannabivarinic acid (THCVA).
25. The pressed chewing gum tablet according to claim 1, wherein the tablet comprises a further active ingredient different from the one or more cannabinoids.
26. A compressed chewing gum tablet, the tablet comprising a plurality of particles, and the tablet constituting at least two layers, wherein a) a first layer of the tablet comprises water-insoluble gum base and b) a second layer of the tablet, which is cohered to and adjacent to the first layer, comprises water-soluble chewing gum ingredients, the second layer being free of water-insoluble gum base, and wherein the tablet comprises one or more cannabinoids.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6) The invention will now be described in more details with reference to
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(13) The invention will now be described in more details with respect to certain aspects and embodiments of the invention. These aspects and embodiments are intended to be understood in connection with the rest of the description, including the Summary of the Invention, the Figures and the Examples of the invention.
(14) The verb “to comprise” as is used in this description and in the claims and its conjugations are used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. In addition, reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the elements are present, unless the context clearly requires that there is one and only one of the elements. The indefinite article “a” or “an” thus usually means “at least one”. Additionally, the words “a” and “an” when used in the present document in connection with the word comprising or containing denote “one or more.” The expression “one or more” is intended to mean one, two, three or more.
(15) In the present context the phrase “first population of particles”, “second population of particles” or “further populations of particles” refer to a distinct population of particles. The expression “first”, “second” or “third” is intended to mean that the individual populations have different compositions, e.g. a “first” population may be a portion of particles that have a content of gum base whereas a “second” population may be a portion of particles that does not have a content of gum base. However, if a “first” and “second” population is applied in one layer of a tablet, a “first” population in a second layer of the tablet may also have a different composition compared to a “first” population in the first layer. This may for instance be the case when one type of sugar alcohol is applied as a “first population of particles” in one layer and another type of sugar alcohol is applied as a “first population of particles” in another layer. The intention with the wording is mainly to distinguish two or more populations that are applied together, for instance in a homogeneous mixture. The individual particles in a “population” may comprise more than one ingredient, such as for instance both water-insoluble gum base and water-soluble chewing gum ingredients, or other ingredients.
(16) The term “population” as such is intended to mean a statistical population of particles characterized by a number of different parameters, e.g. statistical parameters such as distribution of particles, average particle size, particle size distribution width, etc. Hence, a “population” may be a portion of particles characterized by having a normal distribution of particles with an average particle size, mean particles size and a distribution width. However, a “population” may also be a portion of particles that have undergone sieving where a certain lower or upper limit of particles size is present which does not necessarily give a normal distribution of particles.
(17) The term “particle size” relates to the ability of the particles to move through or be retained by sieve holes of a specific size. The content of particles having a particle size in a certain size range is provided as weight percent relative to the total weight of the particle population in question. For instance, the population of particles having a content of gum base may e.g. comprise 40% (w/w) particles having a size in the range of 500-800 microns and 60% (w/w) particles having a size in the range of 800-1400 microns. An average “particles size” is intended to mean a statistical average.
(18) The term “plurality of particles” is intended to cover the “population of particles” in the sense that the sum of populations are covered by the term “plurality”.
(19) The term “portion of particles” or similar wording is intended to mean a plurality of particles that collectively may comprise one or more populations of particles. For instance, a “portion of particles” may be applied in a tableting apparatus and pressed into a first layer of a tableted chewing gum composition. This layer may comprise one population of particles or a “first population of particles”. However, this portion may also comprise two “populations of particles”, etc.
(20) The term “particle” or similar wording is intended to denote a single, discrete composition of solid matter, such as a granule or individual elements in powder, having a certain size that may deviate considerable.
(21) By the terms “water-insoluble gum base” or “gum base” or “gum base matrix” or similar wording is meant the mainly water-insoluble ingredients and hydrophobic gum base ingredients. The “gum base” may contain gum base polymers and plasticizers, waxes, emulsifiers, fats and/or fillers.
(22) The term “water-soluble chewing gum ingredients” intends to mean the mainly water-soluble and hydrophilic chewing gum ingredients.
(23) The term “tableted” is intended to mean that the chewing gum composition is pressed in a tableting apparatus and mainly being composed of particulate matter, such as one or more populations of particles or plurality of particles. Although the term “tableted” implies a method step, in the present context, the term is intended to mean the resulting tablet obtained in tableting a portion of particles. It is noted that a tablet or tableted composition that is mentioned to comprise particles eventually is to be understood as particles that have been pressed together in a tableting step.
(24) The term “weight of the chewing gum” or similar wording meaning the same is defined in the present context as weight of the chewing gum, not including the weight of an outer coating, such as a hard coating, soft coating, and the like.
(25) By the phrase “texture” is meant a qualitative measure of the viscoelastic properties of the chewing gum and of the overall mouth-feel experienced by the user during the chewing process. Thus, the term “texture” encompasses measurable quantities such as hardness and elasticity as well as more subjective parameters related to the chew-feel experienced by a user.
(26) The term “in vivo chewing” intends to mean that the chewing gum system is chewed by a human subject in an experimental setup of trained test persons according to statistically principles and that either the saliva of the human subject is subject to measurements or the chewed chewing gum is subject to measurements, the experimental setup being performed at a chewing frequency of 60 chews per minute.
(27) The term “in vivo release” or “in vivo testing of release” or similar wording intends to mean that the chewing gum is tested according to Example 24.
(28) The term “in vitro release” or “in vitro testing of release” or similar wording intends to mean that the chewing gum is tested according to Example 25, in particular according to Dissolution Test for Chewing Gums, General Monograph 2.9.25 in European Pharmacopoeia, 5th ed.
(29) The term “release” in the present context is intended to mean under “in vitro” conditions if not stated otherwise. In particular, the “release rate” during a certain period of time is intended to mean the amount in percentage of cannabinoids that is released during the period at a chewing frequency of 60 chews per minute.
(30) The term “sustained release” or “extended release” is herein intended to mean prolonged release over time. The term “rapid release” or “quick release” or “high release” is herein intended to mean a higher content released for a given period of time. The term “controlled release” is intended to mean a release of a substance from a gum by the aid of active chewing of the gum in the oral cavity of the subject, whereby the active chewing is controlling the amount of substance released.
(31) The term “delivery to the oral mucosa” or similar wording intends to mean that the chewing gum is tested according to Example 27.
(32) A “self-emulsifying agent” is an agent which will form an emulsion when presented with an alternate phase with a minimum energy requirement. In contrast, an emulsifying agent, as opposed to a self-emulsifying agent, is one requiring additional energy to form an emulsion.
(33) The term “natural resin”, as used herein, means resinous compounds being either polyterpene derived from terpenes of natural origin or resinous compounds derived from gum rosin, wood rosin or tall-oil rosin.
(34) The gum base is the masticatory substance of the chewing gum, which imparts the chew characteristics to the final product. The gum base typically defines the release profile and plays a significant role in the gum product. The gum base portion is retained in the mouth throughout the chew. The water-soluble portion disappears over a period of time during chewing.
(35) According to embodiments of the invention, a preferred amount of gum base matrix in the final chewing gum is 30-75% by weight of the chewing gum before any optionally applied coating, such as 35-70% by weight of the chewing gum or 40-65% by weight of the chewing gum or 45-60% by weight of the chewing gum.
(36) Elastomers provide the rubbery, elastomeric and bouncing nature to the gum, which varies depending on this ingredient's chemical structure and how it may be compounded with other ingredients. Elastomers suitable for use in the gum base and gum of the present invention may include natural or synthetic types. Polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers are not considered elastomers according to the invention.
(37) Elastomers may be selected from the group consisting of styrene-butadiene copolymers, polyisobutylene, isobutylene-isoprene copolymers, polyethylene, polyurethane or any combination thereof. Preferred elastomers are styrene-butadiene copolymers (SBR), polyisobutylene and isobutylene-isoprene copolymers (BR).
(38) Styrene-butadiene type elastomers, or SBR as they may be called, typically are copolymers of from about 20:80 to 60:40 styrenes:butadiene monomers. The ratio of these monomers affects the elasticity of the SBR as evaluated by mooney viscosity. As the styrene:butadiene ratio decreases, the mooney viscosity decreases.
(39) The structure of SBR typically consists of straight chain 1,3-butadiene copolymerized with phenylethylene (styrene). The average molecular weight of SBR is <600,000 g/mole.
(40) Isobutylene-isoprene type elastomers, or butyl as they may be called, have molar percent levels of isoprene ranging from 0.2 to 4.0. Similar to SBR, as the isoprene:isobutylene ratio decreases, so does the elasticity, measured by mooney viscosity.
(41) The structure of butyl rubber typically consists of branched 2-methyl-1,3-butadiene (isoprene) copolymerized with branched 2-methylpropene (isobutylene). The average molecular weight of BR is in the range from 150,000 g/mole to 1,000,000 g/mole.
(42) Polyisobutylene, or PIB as they may be called, type elastomers are polymers of 2-methylpropene. The low molecular weight elastomers provide soft chew characteristics to the gum base and still provide the elastic qualities as do the other elastomers. Average molecular weights may range from about 30,000 to 120,000 g/mole and the penetration may range from about 4 millimeters to 20 millimeters. The higher the penetration, the softer the PIB. Similar to the SBR and butyl, the high molecular weight elastomers provide elasticity to the gum. Average molecular weight may range from 120,000 to 1,000,000 g/mole.
(43) Polybutene range in average molecular weight from about 5,000 g/mole to about 30,000 g/mole.
(44) Useful natural elastomers include natural rubber such as smoked or liquid latex and guayule, natural gums such as jelutong, lechi caspi, perillo, sorva, massaranduba balata, massaranduba chocolate, nispero, rosidinha, chicle, gutta percha, gutta kataiu, niger gutta, tunu, chilte, chiquibul, gutta hang kang. Natural elastomers may also be applied in aspects of the present invention.
(45) Elastomer plasticizers vary the firmness of the gum base. Their specificity on elastomer inter-molecular chain breaking (plasticizing) along with their varying softening points cause varying degrees of finished gum firmness and compatibility when used in base. Polyvinyl acetate elastomers plasticizers are examples of elastomer plasticizers of the present invention.
(46) In some embodiments of the invention, the weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers is from 5,000 to 40,000. In some embodiments of the invention, the weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers is from 6,000 to 35,000. In some embodiments of the invention, the weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers is from 7,000 to 30,000. In some embodiments of the invention, the weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers is from 8,000 to 25,000. In some embodiments of the invention, the weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers is from 10,000 to 20,000.
(47) In some embodiments of the invention, the viscosity of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers is from 1.0 to 3.0 mPa*s as measured according to ASTM D445-06 (10 wt. % in ethyl acetate), such as from 1.0 to 2.5 mPa*s.
(48) In some embodiments of the invention, the K value of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers is from 15 to 33 as measured according to DIN 53726 (1 wt. % in acetone), such as from 18 to 30.
(49) Generally, the term “polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizer” is intended to mean polyvinyl acetate having a weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of less than about 40,000.
(50) Generally, the term “polyvinyl acetate elastomer” is intended to mean polyvinyl acetate having a weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of more than about 40,000.
(51) In certain embodiments of the invention, the gum base comprises less than 10% by weight of polyvinyl acetate elastomer. In certain embodiments of the invention, the gum base comprises less than 5% by weight of polyvinyl acetate elastomer. In certain embodiments of the invention, the gum base comprises 2 to 6% by weight of polyvinyl acetate elastomer. In certain embodiments of the invention, the gum base comprises 3 to 5% by weight of polyvinyl acetate elastomer. In certain embodiments of the invention, the gum base is substantially free of polyvinyl acetate elastomer.
(52) In certain embodiments of the invention, the gum base comprises 15-35% by weight of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers and less than 10% by weight of polyvinyl acetate elastomer. In certain embodiments of the invention, the gum base comprises 15-35% by weight of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers and less than 5% by weight of polyvinyl acetate elastomer. In certain embodiments of the invention, the gum base comprises 15-35% by weight of the one or more polyvinyl acetate elastomer plasticizers and 2 to 6% by weight of polyvinyl acetate elastomer.
(53) Natural resins may be selected from ester gums including as examples glycerol esters of partially hydrogenated rosins, glycerol esters of polymerized rosins, glycerol esters of partially dimerized rosins, glycerol esters of tally oil rosins, pentaerythritol esters of partially hydrogenated rosins, methyl esters of rosins, partially hydrogenated methyl esters of rosins, pentaerythritol esters of rosins, synthetic resins such as terpene resins derived from alpha-pinene, beta-pinene, and/or d-limonene, and natural terpene resins.
(54) In an embodiment of the invention, the chewing gum comprises further chewing gum ingredients selected from the group consisting of flavors, dry-binders, tableting aids, anti-caking agents, emulsifiers, antioxidants, enhancers, mucoadhesives, absorption enhancers, high intensity sweeteners, softeners, colors, active ingredients, water-soluble indigestible polysaccharides, water-insoluble polysaccharides or any combination thereof.
(55) According to embodiments of the invention, the emulsifiers may be selected from the group consisting of sucrose ester of fatty acids (such as sucrose mono stearate), polyethylene glycol esters or ethers (PEG) (such as caprylocaproyl macrogol-8 glycerides and lauroyl macrogol-32-glycerides), mono- and diglyceride of fatty acids (such as glycerol monostearate, glycerol monolaurate, glyceryl behenate ester), acetic acid esters of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids (Acetem), polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, diacetyl tartaric ester of monoglycerides, lactylated monoglycerides, glycerophospholipids (such as lecithin), poloxamer (non-ionic block copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide), cyclodextrins, fatty acid esters of sorbitol (such as sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monostearate, sorbitan tristearate, polysorbates). Self-emulsifying emulsifiers may be phospholipids (Lecithin), Polysorbates (polysorbate 80).
(56) SEDDS (self-emulsifying drug delivery system) may consist of hard or soft capsules filled with a liquid or a gel that consists of self-emulsifiers, one or more cannabinoids, oil (to dissolve the cannabinoids) and a surfactant. SEDDS may comprise of a blend or mixture of self-emulsifiers, one or more cannabinoids, oil (to dissolve the cannabinoids) and a surfactant. SEDDS may comprise granules comprising self-emulsifiers, one or more cannabinoids, oil (to dissolve the cannabinoids) and a surfactant. Upon contact with gastric fluid, the SEDDS spontaneously emulsify due to the presence of surfactants. Many surfactants, however, are lipid based and interact with lipases in the GIT (gastro intestinal tract). This can lead to a reduced capability of the lipid-based surfactants to emulsify the one or more cannabinoids as well as the oil carrier, both reducing bioavailability.
(57) According to embodiments of the invention, flavors may be selected from the group consisting of coconut, coffee, chocolate, vanilla, grape fruit, orange, lime, menthol, liquorice, caramel aroma, honey aroma, peanut, walnut, cashew, hazelnut, almonds, pineapple, strawberry, raspberry, tropical fruits, cherries, cinnamon, peppermint, wintergreen, spearmint, eucalyptus, and mint, fruit essence such as from apple, pear, peach, strawberry, apricot, raspberry, cherry, pineapple, and plum essence. The essential oils include peppermint, spearmint, menthol, eucalyptus, clove oil, bay oil, anise, thyme, cedar leaf oil, nutmeg, and oils of the fruits mentioned above.
(58) Petroleum waxes aid in the curing of the finished gum made from the gum base as well as improve shelf life and texture. Wax crystal size influences the release of flavor. Those waxes high in iso-alkanes have a smaller crystal size than those waxes high in normal-alkanes, especially those with normal-alkanes of carbon numbers less than 30. The smaller crystal size allows slower release of flavor since there is more hindrance of the flavor's escape from this wax versus a wax having larger crystal sizes.
(59) Petroleum wax (refined paraffin and microcrystalline wax) and paraffin wax are composed of mainly straight-chained normal-alkanes and branched iso-alkanes. The ratio of normal-alkanes to iso-alkanes varies.
(60) Antioxidants prolong shelf life and storage of gum base, finished gum or their respective components including fats and flavor oils.
(61) Antioxidants suitable for use in gum base include butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), betacarotenes, tocopherols, acidulants such as Vitamin C (ascorbic acid or corresponding salts (ascorbates)), propyl gallate, catechins, other synthetic and natural types or mixtures thereof.
(62) Further chewing gum ingredients, which may be included in the chewing gum according to the present invention, include surfactants and/or solubilizers. As examples of types of surfactants to be used as solubilizers in a chewing gum composition according to the invention, reference is made to H. P. Fiedler, Lexikon der Hilfstoffe für Pharmacie, Kosmetik and Angrenzende Gebiete, pages 63-64 (1981) and the lists of approved food emulsifiers of the individual countries. Anionic, cationic, amphoteric or non-ionic solubilizers can be used. Suitable solubilizers include lecithin, polyoxyethylene stearate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters, fatty acid salts, mono and diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono and diglycerides of edible fatty acids, citric acid esters of mono and diglycerides of edible fatty acids, saccharose esters of fatty acids, polyglycerol esters of fatty acids, polyglycerol esters of interesterified castor oil acid (E476), sodium stearoyllatylate, sodium lauryl sulfate and sorbitan esters of fatty acids and polyoxyethylated hydrogenated castor oil (e.g. the product sold under the trade name CREMOPHOR), block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide (e.g. products sold under trade names PLURONIC and POLOXAMER), polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters of fatty acids and polyoxyethylene steraric acid esters.
(63) Particularly suitable solubilizers are polyoxyethylene stearates, such as for instance polyoxyethylene(8)stearate and polyoxyethylene(40)stearate, the polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters sold under the trade name TWEEN, for instance TWEEN 20 (monolaurate), TWEEN 80 (monooleate), TWEEN 40 (monopalmitate), TWEEN 60 (monostearate) or TWEEN 65 (tristearate), mono and diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono and diglycerides of edible fatty acids, citric acid esters of mono and diglycerides of edible fatty acids, sodium stearoyllatylate, sodium laurylsulfate, polyoxyethylated hydrogenated castor oil, blockcopolymers of ethylene oxide and propyleneoxide and polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ether. The solubilizer may either be a single compound or a combination of several compounds. In the presence of an active ingredient, such as the included one or more cannabinoids, the chewing gum may preferably also comprise a carrier known in the arts of chewing gum and active ingredients. Poloxamer F68 is a further highly suitable solubilizer.
(64) High intensity artificial sweetening agents can also be used according to preferred embodiments of the invention. Preferred high intensity sweeteners include, but are not limited to sucralose, aspartame, salts of acesulfame, alitame, neotame, saccharin and its salts, cyclamic acid and its salts, glycyrrhizin, dihydrochalcones, thaumatin, monellin, monk fruit extract, advantame, stevioside and the like, alone or in combination.
(65) In order to provide longer lasting sweetness and flavor perception, it may be desirable to encapsulate or otherwise control the release of at least a portion of the artificial sweeteners.
(66) Techniques such as wet granulation, wax granulation, spray drying, spray chilling, fluid bed coating, conservation, encapsulation in yeast cells and fiber extrusion may be used to achieve desired release characteristics. Encapsulation of sweetening agents can also be provided using another chewing gum component such as a resinous compound.
(67) Usage level of the high-intensity sweetener will vary considerably and will depend on factors such as potency of the sweetener, rate of release, desired sweetness of the product, level and type of flavor used and cost considerations. Thus, the active level of artificial sweetener may vary from about 0.001 to about 8% by weight (preferably from about 0.02 to about 8% by weight). When carriers used for encapsulation are included, the usage level of the encapsulated high-intensity sweetener will be proportionately higher.
(68) A chewing gum and/or gum base may, if desired, include one or more fillers/texturizers including as examples, magnesium- and calcium carbonate, sodium sulphate, ground limestone, silicate compounds such as magnesium- and aluminum silicate, kaolin and clay, aluminum oxide, silicium oxide, talc, titanium oxide, mono-, di- and tri-calcium phosphates, cellulose polymers, such as wood, and combinations thereof. According to an embodiment of the invention, one preferred filler/texturizer is calcium carbonate.
(69) A number of chewing gum components well known within the art may be applied within the scope of the present invention. Such components comprise but are not limited to waxes, fats, softeners, fillers, bulk sweeteners, flavors, antioxidants, emulsifiers, coloring agents, binding agents and acidulants.
(70) In an embodiment of the invention, water-soluble ingredients comprise at least one sugar alcohol. The at least one sugar alcohol may be selected from the group consisting of xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, isomaltitol, isomalt, erythritol, lactitol, maltodextrin, hydrogenated starch hydrolysates, and combinations thereof.
(71) A specific example of one category of polyol sweeteners include sugars, in particular a sugar selected from the group consisting of dextrose, sucrose, maltose, fructose, lactose, and combinations thereof.
(72) A method of manufacturing tableted chewing gum according to the invention may be as follows:
(73) Gum bases are typically prepared by adding an amount of the elastomer, elastomer plasticizer and filler to a heated (100° C.-120° C.) sigma blade mixer with a front to rear speed ratio of from about 1.2:1 to about 2:1, the higher ratio typically being used for gum base which requires more rigorous compounding of its elastomers.
(74) The initial amounts of ingredients comprising the initial mass may be determined by the working capacity of the mixing kettle in order to attain a proper consistency and by the degree of compounding desired to break down the elastomer and increase chain branching. The higher the level of filler at the start or selection of a filler having a certain particle size distribution, the higher the degree of compounding and thus more of the elastomeric chain crosslinking are broken, causing more branching of the elastomer thus lower viscosity gum bases and thus softer final gum base and gum made from such a gum base. The longer the time of compounding, the use of lower molecular weight or softening point gum base ingredients, the lower the viscosity and firmness of the final gum base.
(75) Compounding typically begins to be effective once the ingredients have massed together. Anywhere from 15 minutes to 90 minutes may be the length of compounding time.
(76) Preferably, the time of compounding is from 20 minutes to about 60 minutes. The amount of added elastomer plasticizer depends on the level of elastomer and filler present. If too much elastomer plasticizer is added, the initial mass becomes over plasticized and not homogeneous.
(77) After the initial ingredients have massed homogeneously and compounded for the time desired, the balance of the gum base ingredients are added in a sequential manner until a completely homogeneous molten mass is attained. Typically, any remainder of elastomer, elastomer plasticizer and filler, are added within 60 minutes after the initial compounding time. The filler and the elastomer plasticizer would typically be individually weighed and added in portions during this time. The optional waxes, softeners and antioxidants are typically added after the elastomer and elastomer plasticizers and during the next 60 minutes. Then the mass is allowed to become homogeneous before dumping.
(78) Typical gum base processing times may vary from about one to about three hours, preferably from about 1½ to 2½ hours, depending on the formulation. The final mass temperature when dumped may be between 70° C. and 130° C. and preferably between 100° C. and 120° C. The completed molten mass is emptied from the mixing kettle into coated or lined pans, extruded or cast into any desirable shape and allowed to cool and solidify. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many variations of the above described procedure may be followed.
(79) The gum base (or gum composition) may be further processed in an extruder where the gum composition is extruded through a die plate into a liquid filled chamber, resulting in particles directly applicable for tableting. Alternatively, the gum base may be milled into a desired particle range.
(80) The water-soluble chewing gum ingredients of the tableted chewing gum may comprise softeners, sweeteners, high intensity sweeteners, flavoring agents, acidulants, fillers, antioxidants, and other components that provide desired attributes. Softeners typically constitute from about 0.5% to about 25.0% by weight of the chewing gum. The bulking agents generally comprise from about 5% to about 90%, preferably from about 20% to about 80% of the chewing gum. High-intensity sweeteners in gum typically may range from about 0.01 to 0.50 weight percent. Flavoring agents may be present in the chewing gum in an amount within the range of from about 0.1 to about 15.0 weight percent of the gum.
(81) The water-soluble chewing gum ingredients of the tableted chewing gum composition according to the invention may be part of the first population of particles and subsequently subject to further processing in an extruder where the gum composition is extruded through a die plate into a liquid filled chamber, before tableting. However, the water-soluble chewing gum ingredients may also be part of a second population of particles or further populations of particles that are not exposed to a liquid filled chamber but applied together with the first population of particles to a tableting apparatus. In yet another embodiments, the water-soluble chewing gum ingredients may be part of the particles comprising water-insoluble gum base and not exposed to a liquid filled chamber but used directly in a tableting apparatus, optionally together with additional separate ingredients.
(82) In an embodiment of the invention, the first population of particles, comprising water-insoluble gum base, has an average diameter in the range from 0.1 to 2.5 mm.
(83) In an embodiment of the invention, the first population of particles, comprising water-insoluble gum base, has an average diameter in the range from 0.3 to 2.1 mm.
(84) In an embodiment of the invention, the first population of particles, comprising water-insoluble gum base, has an average diameter in the range from 0.8 to 1.4 mm.
(85) The tableted chewing gum composition according to the invention is manufactured by applying pressure to a content of particles by suitable compression means. The particles or powder is then pressed into a compact coherent tablet. The particles may for example comprise so-called primary particles or aggregated primary particles. When these are pressed, bonds are established between the particles or granules, thereby conferring a certain mechanical strength to the pressed tablet.
(86) It should be noted that the above-introduced terms: powder, primary particles and aggregated primary particles may be somewhat misleading in the sense that the difference between primary particles and aggregated primary particles may very often be looked upon differently depending on the background of the user. Some may for instance regard a sweetener, such as sorbitol, as a primary particle in spite of the fact that sorbitol due to the typically preprocessing performed on sorbitol when delivered to the customer should rather be regarded as some sort of aggregated primary particles. The definition adopted in the description of this invention is that aggregated primary particles refer to macro-particles comprising more or less preprocessed primary particles.
(87) When pressure is applied to the particles, the bulk volume is reduced, and the amount of air is decreased. During this process energy is consumed. As the particles come into closer proximity to each other during the volume reduction process, bonds may be established between the particles or granules. The formation of bonds is associated with a reduction in the energy of the system as energy is released. Volume reduction takes place by various mechanisms and different types of bonds may be established between the particles or granules depending on the pressure applied and the properties of the particles or granules. The first thing that happens when a powder is pressed is that the particles are rearranged under low compaction pressures to form a closer packing structure. Particles with a regular shape appear to undergo rearrangement more easily than those of irregular shape. As the pressure increases, further rearrangement is prevented, and subsequent volume reduction is obtained by plastic and elastic deformation and/or fragmentation of the tablet particles. Brittle particles are likely to undergo fragmentation, i.e. breakage of the original particles into smaller units. Plastic deformation is an irreversible process resulting in a permanent change of particle shape, whereas the particles resume their original shape after elastic deformation. Evidently, both plastic and elastic deformation may occur, when compressing a chewing gum tablet.
(88) Several studies of the bond types in pressed tablets have been made over the years, typically in the context of pharmaceuticals and several techniques of obtaining pressed tablets on the basis of available powders has been provided. Such studies have been quite focused on what happens when the volume reduction is performed and how the end-product may be optimized for the given purpose. Several refinements with respect to pressed tablets has for instance been made in the addition of for example binders in the tablet raw materials for the purpose of obtaining a sufficient strength to the final pressed tablet while maintaining acceptable properties, e.g. with respect to release.
(89) Contrary to the tableted chewing gum composition according to the invention, conventional chewing gum (which is mentioned here for reference purposes) may be manufactured by sequentially adding the various chewing gum ingredients to a commercially available mixer known in the art where the finished gum base is already present. After the initial ingredients have been thoroughly mixed, the gum mass is discharged from the mixer and shaped into the desired form such as by rolling into sheets and cutting into sticks, extruded into chunks or casting into pellets. Generally, the ingredients of conventional chewing gum may be mixed by first melting the gum base and adding it to the running mixer. Colors, active agents and/or emulsifiers may also be added at this time. A softener such as glycerin may also be added at this time, along with syrup and a portion of the bulking agent/sweetener. Further portions of the bulking agent/sweetener may then be added to the mixer. A flavoring agent is typically added with the final portion of the bulking agent/sweetener. A high-intensity sweetener is preferably added after the final portion of bulking agent and flavor have been added. The entire mixing procedure typically takes from thirty to forty minutes, but longer mixing times may sometimes be required. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many variations of the above described procedure may be followed.
(90) In accordance with the invention, the tableted chewing gum according to the invention may comprise about 0.1 to about 75% by weight of an outer coating applied onto the chewing gum centre. Thus, suitable coating types include hard coatings, film coatings and soft coatings of any composition including those currently used in coating of tableted chewing gum.
(91) One presently preferred outer coating type is a hard coating, which term is used in the conventional meaning of that term including sugar coatings and sugar-free (or sugarless) coatings and combinations thereof. The object of hard coating is to obtain a sweet, crunchy layer, which is appreciated by the consumer and it may moreover protect the gum centres for various reasons. In a typical process of providing the chewing gum centres with a protective sugar coating, the gum centres are successively treated in suitable coating equipment with aqueous solutions of crystallisable sugar such as sucrose or dextrose, which, depending on the stage of coating reached, may contain other functional ingredients, e.g. fillers, binding agents, colours, etc. In the present context, the sugar coating may contain further functional or active compounds including flavour compounds and/or active compounds.
(92) In a typical hard coating process as it will be described in detail in the following, a suspension containing crystallisable sugar and/or polyol is applied onto the gum centres and the water it contains is evaporated off by blowing with air. This cycle must be repeated several times, typically 3 to 80 times, in order to reach the swelling required. The term “swelling” refers to the increase in weight or thickness of the products, as considered at the end of the coating operation by comparison with the beginning, and in relation to the final weight or thickness of the coated products. In accordance with the present invention, the coating layer constitutes about 0.1 to about 75% by weight of the finished chewing gum element, such as about 10 to about 60% by weight, including about 15 to about 50% by weight.
(93) In further useful embodiments, the outer coating of the chewing gum element of the invention is an element that is subjected to a film coating process and which therefore comprises one or more film-forming polymeric agents and optionally one or more auxiliary compounds, e.g. plasticizers, pigments and opacifiers. A film coating is a thin polymer-based coating applied to a chewing gum centre of any of the above forms. The thickness of such a coating is usually between 20 and 100 μm. Generally, the film coating is obtained by passing the chewing gum centres through a spray zone with atomized droplets of the coating materials in a suitable aqueous or organic solvent vehicle, after which the material adhering to the gum centres is dried before the next portion of coating is received. This cycle is repeated until the coating is complete.
(94) In the present context, suitable film-coating polymers include edible cellulose derivatives such as cellulose ethers including methylcellulose (MC), hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Other useful film-coating agents are acrylic polymers and copolymers, e.g. methylacrylate aminoester copolymer or mixtures of cellulose derivatives and acrylic polymers. A particular group of film-coating polymers, also referred to as functional polymers are polymers that, in addition to its film-forming characteristics, confer a modified release performance with respect to active components of the chewing gum formulation. Such release modifying polymers include methylacrylate ester copolymers, ethylcellulose (EC) and enteric polymers designed to resist the acidic stomach environment. The latter group of polymers include: cellulose acetate phtalate (CAP), polyvinyl acetate phtalate (PVAP), shellac, metacrylic acid copolymers, cellulose acetate trimellitate (CAT) and HPMC. It will be appreciated that the outer film coating according to the present invention may comprise any combination of the above film-coating polymers.
(95) According to the invention, the one or more cannabinoids may be selected from various cannabinoids.
(96) “Cannabinoids” are a group of compounds including the endocannabinoids, the phytocannabinoids and those which are neither endocannabinoids or phytocannabinoids, hereinafter “syntho-cannabinoids”.
(97) “Endocannabinoids” are endogenous cannabinoids, which may have high affinity ligands of CB1 and CB2 receptors.
(98) “Phytocannabinoids” are cannabinoids that originate in nature and can be found in the cannabis plant. The phytocannabinoids can be present in an extract including a botanical drug substance, isolated, or reproduced synthetically.
(99) “Syntho-cannabinoids” are those compounds capable of interacting with the cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and/or CB2) but are not found endogenously or in the cannabis plant. Examples include WIN 55212 and rimonabant.
(100) An “isolated phytocannabinoid” is one which has been extracted from the cannabis plant and purified to such an extent that the additional components such as secondary and minor cannabinoids and the non-cannabinoid fraction have been substantially removed.
(101) A “synthetic cannabinoid” is one which has been produced by chemical synthesis. This term includes modifying an isolated phytocannabinoid, by, for example, forming a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
(102) A “substantially pure” cannabinoid is defined as a cannabinoid which is present at greater than 95% (w/w) pure. More preferably greater than 96% (w/w) through 97% (w/w) thorough 98% (w/w) to 99% % (w/w) and greater.
(103) A “highly purified” cannabinoid is defined as a cannabinoid that has been extracted from the cannabis plant and purified to the extent that other cannabinoids and non-cannabinoid components that are co-extracted with the cannabinoids have been substantially removed, such that the highly purified cannabinoid is greater than or equal to 95% (w/w) pure.
(104) “Plant material” is defined as a plant or plant part (e.g. bark, wood, leaves, stems, roots, flowers, fruits, seeds, berries or parts thereof) as well as exudates, and includes material falling within the definition of “botanical raw material” in the Guidance for Industry Botanical Drug Products Draft Guidance, August 2000, US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
(105) In the context of this application the terms “cannabinoid extract” or “extract of cannabinoids”, which are used interchangeably, encompass “Botanical Drug Substances” derived from cannabis plant material. A Botanical Drug Substance is defined in the Guidance for Industry Botanical Drug Products Draft Guidance, August 2000, US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research as: “A drug substance derived from one or more plants, algae, or macroscopic fungi. It is prepared from botanical raw materials by one or more of the following processes: pulverisation, decoction, expression, aqueous extraction, ethanolic extraction, or other similar processes.” A botanical drug substance does not include a highly purified or chemically modified substance derived from natural sources. Thus, in the case of cannabis, “botanical drug substances” derived from cannabis plants do not include highly purified, Pharmacopoeial grade cannabinoids.
(106) The term “Cannabis plant(s)” encompasses wild type Cannabis sativa and also variants thereof, including cannabis chemovars which naturally contain different amounts of the individual cannabinoids, Cannabis sativa subspecies indica including the variants var. indica and var. kafiristanica, Cannabis indica, Cannabis ruderalis and also plants which are the result of genetic crosses, self-crosses or hybrids thereof. The term “Cannabis plant material” is to be interpreted accordingly as encompassing plant material derived from one or more cannabis plants. For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby stated that “cannabis plant material” includes dried cannabis biomass.
(107) Preferably the one or more cannabinoids are selected from: cannabichromene (CBC), cannabichromenic acid (CBCV), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), cannabidivarin (CBDV), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabigerol propyl variant (CBGV), cannabicyclol (CBL), cannabinol (CBN), cannabinol propyl variant (CBNV), cannabitriol (CBO), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) and tetrahydrocannabivarinic acid (THCV A). More preferably the one or more cannabinoid is CBD or THC. This list is not exhaustive and merely details the cannabinoids which are identified in the present application for reference.
(108) So far, more than 120 different phytocannabinoids have been identified which are within the scope of the present invention.
(109) Cannabinoids can be split into different groups as follows: Phytocannabinoids; Endocannabinoids; and Synthetic cannabinoids.
(110) Cannabinoid receptors can be activated by three major groups of agonist ligands, for the purposes of the present invention and whether or not explicitly denominated as such herein, lipophilic in nature and classed respectively as: endocannabinoids (produced endogenously by mammalian cells); phytocannabinoids (such as cannabidiol, produced by the cannabis plant); and, synthetic cannabinoids (such as HU-210).
(111) Phytocannabinoids can be found as either the neutral carboxylic acid form or the decarboxylated form depending on the method used to extract the cannabinoids. For example, it is known that heating the carboxylic acid form will cause most of the carboxylic acid form to decarboxylate.
(112) Phytocannabinoids can also occur as either the pentyl (5 carbon atoms) or propyl (3 carbon atoms) variant. For example, the phytocannabinoid THC is known to be a CB1 receptor agonist whereas the propyl variant THCV has been discovered to be a CB1 receptor antagonist meaning that it has almost opposite effects.
(113) According to the invention, examples of phytocannabinoids may be cannabichromene (CBC), cannabichromenic acid (CBCV), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), cannabidivarin (CBDV), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabigerol propyl variant (CBGV), cannabicyclol (CBL), cannabinol (CBN), cannabinol propyl variant (CBNV), cannabitriol (CBO), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) and tetrahydrocannabivarinic acid (THCV A). More preferably the one or more cannabinoid is CBD or THC.
(114) The formulation according to the present invention may also comprise at least one cannabinoid selected from those disclosed in A. Douglas Kinghorn et al., Phytocannabinoids, Vol. 103, Chapter 1, pages 1-30.
(115) Examples of endocannabinoids are molecules that activate the cannabinoid receptors within the body. Examples include 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2AG), 2-arachidonyl glyceryl ether (2AGE), arachidonyl dopamine, and arachidonyl ethanolamide (anandamide). Structurally related endogenous molecules have been identified that share similar structural features, but that display weak or no activity towards the cannabinoid receptors but are also termed endocannabinoids. Examples of these endocannabinoid lipids include 2-acyl glycerols, alkyl or alkenyl glyceryl ethers, acyl dopamines and N-acylethanolamides that contain alternative fatty acid or alcohol moieties, as well as other fatty acid amides containing different head groups. These include N-acylserines as well as many other N-acylated amino acids. Examples of cannabinoid receptor agonists are neuromodulatory and affect short-term memory, appetite, stress response, anxiety, immune function and analgesia.
(116) In one embodiment the cannabinoid is palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) which is an endogenous fatty acid amide belonging to the class of nuclear factor agonists.
(117) Synthetic cannabinoids encompass a variety of distinct chemical classes: the cannabinoids structurally related to THC, the cannabinoids not related to THC, such as (cannabimimetics) including the aminoalkylindoles, 1,5-diarylpyrazoles, quinolines, and arylsulfonamides, and eicosanoids related to the endocannabinoids. All or any of these cannabinoids can be used in the present invention.
(118) It is preferred that the formulation comprises one or two primary cannabinoids, which are preferably selected from the group consisting of, cannabidiol (CBD) or cannabidivarin (CBDV), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), cannabigerol (CBG) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) or a combination thereof. It is preferred that the formulation comprises cannabidiol and/or tetrahydrocannabinol.
(119) Preferably, the chewing gum of the present invention may be used for the treatment or alleviation of pain, epilepsy, cancer, nausea, inflammation, congenital disorders, neurological disorders, oral infections, dental pain, sleep apnea, psychiatric disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, appetite loss, diabetes and fibromyalgia.
(120) In a further aspect of the present invention the oral cannabinoid formulation is suitable for use in the treatment of conditions requiring the administration of a neuroprotectant or anti-convulsive medication.
(121) The oral cannabinoid formulation may be for use in the treatment of seizures.
(122) The oral cannabinoid formulation may be for use in the treatment of Dravet syndrome, Lennox Gastaut syndrome, myoclonic seizures, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, refractory epilepsy, schizophrenia, juvenile spasms, West syndrome, infantile spasms, refractory infantile spasms, tuberous sclerosis complex, brain tumours, neuropathic pain, cannabis use disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, early psychosis, Alzheimer's disease, and autism.
(123) The following non-limiting examples illustrate different variations of the present invention. The examples are meant for indicating the inventive concept; hence the mentioned examples should not be understood as exhaustive for the present. In particular, CBD is used as an exemplary compound, but may also be another cannabinoid.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
(124) A: Preparation of Water Insoluble Gum Base Particles
(125) Twenty different water-insoluble gum base compositions were prepared. The gum base compositions were prepared in the process as described below. In subsequent examples, the specific compositions of the gum bases (GB10 to GB29) are outlined. In all of the gum base examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the gum base.
(126) Elastomers and elastomer plasticizer (PVA) were mixed at 120° C. together with filler, either calcium carbonate or talc, in a mixer having horizontally placed Z-shaped arms for mixing. It is noted that PVA was applied as an elastomer plasticizer for the elastomers in the composition and not in form of an elastomer. PVA as an elastomer plasticizer has special properties in the present context. For some of the comparative examples, another comparative polymer was added together with the elastomers and elastomer plasticizer and mixed together with the elastomer and the elastomer plasticizer. Natural resins were added after about 30 minutes of mixing of the polymers. Once the polymers and the natural resins had softened in the composition, additional ingredients were added, such as triacetin, emulsifier, wax, antioxidants, calcium carbonate, talc, titan dioxide and vegetable fat. A part of the calcium carbonate or talc may be substituted by titan dioxide.
(127) After a total mixing time of about 90-105 minutes, the mixture was discharged into a pan and allowed to cool at room temperature. For some of the examples where butyl rubber (BR) was added as an elastomer, the mixing time was optionally extended to a total of about 110-115 minutes depending on the amount of optional fillers.
(128) The gum compositions were further processed in an extruder (Leistrits ZSE/BL 360 kw 104, available from GALA GmbH, Germany). The gum compositions were extruded through a die plate into a liquid filled chamber (granulator A5 PAC 6, available from GALA GmbH, Germany).
(129) The extruder delivered the composition at a feed rate of 250 kg/h to the die plate. The extruder screw speed was 247 rpm. The temperature in the extruder was about 80° C. and was mainly regulated by the temperature of the gum compositions that were only allowed to cool slightly prior to being introduced into the extruder. The extruder produced a pressure difference of 71 bar.
(130) The gum composition was extruded through the die plate, which was heated to a temperature of 177° C. and had 336 holes with diameter 0.36 mm. In the granulator chamber the extruded composition was cut to particles by a cutter with 8 blades and cutter speed about 2000 rpm. The particles were cooled and transported to a strainer unit (a centrifugal dryer TWS 20, available from GALA GmbH, Germany) in water with temperature about 10° C. and flow 22 m.sup.3/h. The average cooling and transport time in water was approx. 2 seconds. The granule rate was 250 kg/h and the average diameter of the obtained particles was 1.24 mm. The particles correspond to a first population of particles comprising water-insoluble gum base. These particles were used for tableting.
Example 2
(131) Various Gum Base Formulations
(132) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1A Gum base compositions, GB number GB10 GB11 GB12 GB13 GB14 PVA 25 18 30 10 40 PIB 5 10 5 10 5 BR 5 5 5 5 — Nat. 25 20 20 35 15 resin Calcium 17 — 17 17 17 Carbonate Talc — 17 — — — Triacetin — 7 — — — Emulsifier 5 10 5 5 5 Wax 13 13 13 13 13 Veg. fat 5 — 5 5 5 Total 100 100 100 100 100 PVA = polyvinyl acetate (Vinnapas B 1.5 sp., supplied by Wacker); PIB = polyisobutylene (Oppanol B12, supplied by BASF); BR = butyl rubber (isobutylene-isoprene copolymer); Nat. resin = glycerol ester of hydrogenated gum rosin; Veg. fat = vegetable fat.
Example 3
(133) Various Gum Base Formulations
(134) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1B GB number GB15 GB16 GB17 GB18 GB19 PVA 25 25 20 40 15 PIB 5 10 5 5 5 BR 5 5 5 5 — Nat. resin 25 20 30 10 40 Calcium Carbonate 17 17 17 17 17 Talc — — — — — Triacetin — — — — — Emulsifier 5 5 5 5 5 Wax 13 13 13 13 13 Veg. fat 5 5 5 5 5 Total 100 100 100 100 100 Gum base compositions, PVA = polyvinyl acetate (Vinnapas B 1.5 sp., supplied by Wacker); PIB = polyisobutylene (Oppanol B12, supplied by BASF); BR = butyl rubber (isobutylene-isoprene copolymer); Nat. resin = glycerol ester of hydrogenated gum rosin; Veg. fat = vegetable fat.
Example 4
(135) Various Gum Base Formulations
(136) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1C GB number GB20 GB21 GB22 GB23 GB24 PVA 18 18 18 18 18 PIB 10 10 10 10 10 BR 5 5 5 5 5 Nat. resin 20 20 20 20 20 Calcium Carbonate — — — — — Talc 14 16.5 13.5 17 14 Triacetin 7 7 7 7 7 Emulsifier 10 10 10 10 10 Wax 13 13 13 13 13 Veg. fat — — — — — Acesulfame K — 0.5 0.5 — — Menthol 3 — 3 — 3 BHT — — — 0.04 0.04 Total 100 100 100 100 100 Gum base compositions, PVA = polyvinyl acetate (Vinnapas B 1.5 sp., supplied by Wacker); PIB = polyisobutylene (Oppanol B12, supplied by BASF); BR = butyl rubber (isobutylene-isoprene copolymer); Nat. resin = glycerol ester of hydrogenated gum rosin; Veg. fat = vegetable fat; Acesulfame K (HIS = high-intensity sweetener); Menthol (flavor); BHT (Butylated hydroxytoluene = antioxidant).
Example 5
(137) Various Gum Base Formulations
(138) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 1D GB number GB25 GB26 GB27 GB28 GB29 PVA 25 18 30 30 20 PIB 5 10 5 3 3 BR 5 5 — 2 2 Nat. resin 25 20 — — 20 VA-VL — — 20 20 10 Calcium Carbonate 17 — 17 17 17 Talc — 17 — — — Triacetin — 7 — — 2 Emulsifier 5 10 11 11 9 Wax 13 13 12 12 12 Veg. fat 5 — 5 5 5 Total 100 100 100 100 100 Gum base compositions, PVA = polyvinyl acetate (Vinnapas B 1.5 sp., supplied by Wacker); PIB = polyisobutylene (Oppanol B12, supplied by BASF); BR = butyl rubber (isobutylene-isoprene copolymer); Nat. resin = glycerol ester of hydrogenated gum rosin; VA-VL = vinyl acetate-vinyl laurate copolymer (Vinnapas B 500/40VL, supplied by Wacker); Veg. fat = vegetable fat.
Example 6
(139) CBD Extract 52%
(140) CBD extract with a 52% content of CBD provided by CBDepot (batch number CSFF 2018/5) was preheated to around 60° C. for around 0.5 to 1 hour until the extract was in liquid form. The extract had a content of fatty acids, glycerol, waxes, terpenes and flavonoids. After the preheating process, the extract was applied as a thin layer on top of one or more sugar alcohol particles, here isomalt. After mixing until CBD was homogeneously distributed in the isomalt, the mixture was sieved through a 1400 microns sieve.
Example 7
(141) CBD Extract 10%
(142) CBD extract with a 10% content of CBD provided by Medical Hemp (batch number MH131B Gold), was preheated to around 60° C. for around 0.5 to 1 hour until the extract was in liquid form. The extract had a content of fatty acids, glycerol, waxes, terpenes and flavonoids. After the preheating process, the extract was applied as a thin layer on top of one or more sugar alcohol particles, here isomalt. After mixing until CBD was homogeneously distributed in the isomalt, the mixture was sieved through a 1400 microns sieve.
Example 8
(143) CBD Isolate
(144) CBD isolate from cannabis plant tissues (phytocannabinoid) with a 98.5% content of CBD provided by Medical Hemp (batch number MH18212) was dissolved in an 96% ethanol solution. The ratio between the CBD isolate and ethanol was 1:1. Once CBD was dissolved in the ethanol, the CBD isolate was applied in a premix with one or more sugar alcohol particles, here isomalt. After mixing until CBD was homogeneously distributed in the isomalt, the mixture was sieved through a 1400 microns sieve.
Example 9
(145) Preparation of Cannabinoid Sugar Alcohol Premix
(146) A premix was made with CBD and sugar alcohol particles, here isomalt. The premix was made in a weight ratio of about 1:20 of CBD and isomalt with either one of the forms of CBD outlined in Examples 6-8. CBD was added to the sugar alcohol particles and the powder was blended.
Example 10
(147) Preparation of Cannabinoid Cyclodextrin Premix
(148) CBD (extract or isolate) was added and dissolved in a 5% solution of polysorbate 80 to obtain a 10% solution of CBD. The 10% CBD solution was slowly added and mixed into a solution with 10% cyclodextrin to form a CBD-cyclodextrin complex. The water was removed, whereupon the complex was applied in a premix with water-soluble chewing gum ingredients, here isomalt. After mixing until CBD was homogeneously distributed in the isomalt, the mixture was sieved through a 1400 microns sieve.
Example 11
(149) Preparation of Cannabinoid Microcrystalline Cellulose Premix
(150) A cannabinoid-microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) premix was made by first adding free cannabinoid to poloxamer F68 (PF) to obtain a 10% blend of cannabinoid in poloxamer F68. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was added (0.5%) to 50 grams of the cannabinoid-poloxamer F68 solid mix and added to 50 grams of microcrystalline cellulose provided as Avicel PH 102 from FMC Biopolymer. This was then mixed in a Kitchenaid mixer operated at about 30 RPM for about 30 minutes at room temperature. This mixture was equilibrated for about 30 minutes in a sealed container. Hereby, at 5% cannabinoid-MCC premix was obtained.
Example 12
(151) A: Preparation of Tableted Chewing Gum with One Gum Layer
(152) A first population of particles comprising water-insoluble gum base prepared according to Example 1 and formulated according to Examples 2-5 (GB) was mixed with a second population of particles comprising water-soluble chewing gum ingredients. Optionally, further population of particles were added as well as further optional ingredients.
(153) The mixture was blended in a mixing container at 7-12 rpm and optionally loaded with processing aid in order to improve free-flowing properties of the particles. The mixture was subsequently led to a standard tablet pressing machine (3090i, available from Fette GmbH) comprising dosing apparatus (P 3200 C, available from Fette GmbH, Germany) and pressed into tableted chewing gum compositions. The filling depth in the apparatus was 7.5 mm and the diameter 15.0 mm. The tablets were pressed using a pressing pressure of 33.0-33.6 kN and optionally prepressed with a pressing pressure of 1-7 kN. There were 75 punches on the rotor, and the rotor speed used was 11 rpm. The individual tablets had a weight of approx. 1.35 g.
(154) B: Preparation of Tableted Chewing Gum with One Gum Layer
(155) A first population of particles comprising water-insoluble gum base in an amount of 36% by weight of particles was prepared according to Example 1 and formulated according to Examples 2-5 (GB). In this Example, about 56% of isomalt was included in the first population of particles (unless stated otherwise), i.e. gum base and isomalt was included in the same individual particles. Optionally, further population of particles were added as well as further optional ingredients.
(156) The mixture was blended in a mixing container at 7-12 rpm and optionally loaded with processing aid in order to improve free-flowing properties of the particles. The mixture was subsequently led to a standard tablet pressing machine (3090i, available from Fette GmbH) comprising dosing apparatus (P 3200 C, available from Fette GmbH, Germany) and pressed into tableted chewing gum compositions. The filling depth in the apparatus was 7.5 mm and the diameter 15.0 mm. The tablets were pressed using a pressing pressure of 33.0-33.6 kN and optionally prepressed with a pressing pressure of 1-7 kN. There were 75 punches on the rotor, and the rotor speed used was 11 rpm. The individual tablets had a weight of approx. 1.35 g.
Example 13
(157) A: Preparation of Tableted Chewing Gum with One Layer Free of Gum Base
(158) A population of particles comprising water-soluble chewing gum ingredients was provided. Optionally, further population of particles were added as well as further optional ingredients. However, gum base particles were not applied.
(159) Before pressing, the mixture was blended in a mixing container at 7-12 rpm and optionally loaded with processing aid in order to improve free-flowing properties of the particles. The mixture was subsequently led to a standard tablet pressing machine (3090i, available from Fette GmbH) comprising dosing apparatus (P 3200 C, available from Fette GmbH, Germany) and pressed into a layer of the tableted chewing gum compositions. The filling depth in the apparatus was 7.5 mm and the diameter 15.0 mm. The layer of the tablet was pressed using a pressing pressure of 33.0-33.6 kN. There were 75 punches on the rotor, and the rotor speed used was 11 rpm.
(160) Subsequently, a layer according to Example 12A was tableted on top of the prepared layer (does not apply for B-F below). The weight ratio of the two layers was 55 to 45 (gum base free layer to gum base layer). The individual tablets had a weight of approx. 1.6 g.
(161) B: Preparation of Tableted Chewing Gum with One Layer Free of Gum Base
(162) One layer was prepared according to Example 13A. Subsequently, another layer according to Example 12B was tableted on top of the prepared layer. The weight ratio of the two layers was 50 to 50 (Gum base free layer to gum base layer). The individual tablets had a weight of approx. 1.6 g.
(163) C: Preparation of Tableted Chewing Gum with Two Gum Base Layers
(164) One layer was prepared according to Example 12A. Subsequently, another layer according to Example 12A was tableted on top of the prepared layer. The weight ratio of the two layers was 50 to 50 (Gum base layer to gum base layer). The individual tablets had a weight of approx. 1.6 g.
(165) D: Preparation of Tableted Chewing Gum with Three Layers
(166) One layer was prepared according to Example 13A. Subsequently, another layer according to Example 12A was tableted on top of the prepared layer. Subsequently, a further layer according to Example 13A was tableted on top of the layer from Example 12A. The weight ratio of the three layers was 35 to 30 to 35 (gum base free layer to gum base layer to gum base free layer). The individual tablets had a weight of approx. 1.6 g.
(167) E: Preparation of Tableted Chewing Gum with Two Layers and a Gel Capsule Module
(168) One layer was prepared according to Example 13A. Subsequently, a module of non-particulate material was located centrally on top of the prepared layer. In this example the non-particulate material was a gel capsule. Subsequently, another layer according to Example 12A was tableted on top of and fully enclosing the non-particulate material. The weight ratio was 45 to 10 to 45 (gum base free layer to non-particulate material to gum base layer). The individual tablets had a weight of approx. 1.6 g.
(169) F: Preparation of Tableted Chewing Gum with Two Layers and Gum Module
(170) One layer was prepared according to Example 13A. Subsequently, a module of non-particulate material was located on top of the prepared layer. In this example the non-particulate material was a sheet of conventional extruded chewing gum.
(171) Subsequently, another layer according to Example 12A was tableted on top of the sheet of extruded gum, the sheet being visible as a layer from a side view of the tablet. The weight ratio was 45 to 10 to 45 (Gum base free layer to non-particulate material to gum base layer). The individual tablets had a weight of approx. 1.6 g.
Example 14
(172) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(173) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 12A was made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. The tableted chewing gum had a weight of about 1.35 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the chewing gum.
(174) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 1E CG Number CG100 CG101 CG102 CG103 CG104 GB10 36 — — — — GB11 — 36 — — — GB12 — — 36 — — GB13 — — — 36 — GB14 — — — — 36 Isomalt 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.4 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 CBD 52%* 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6.
Example 15
(175) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(176) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 12A was made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. The tableted chewing gum had a weight of about 1.35 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the chewing gum.
(177) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 1F CG Number CG105 CG106 CG107 CG108 CG109 GB15 36 — — — — GB16 — 36 — — — GB17 — — 36 — — GB18 — — — 36 — GB19 — — — — 36 Isomalt 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.4 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 CBD 52%* 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6.
Example 16
(178) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(179) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 12A was made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. The tableted chewing gum had a weight of about 1.35 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the chewing gum.
(180) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 1G CG Number CG110 CG111 CG112 CG113 CG114 GB20 36 — — — — GB21 — 36 — — — GB22 — — 36 — — GB23 — — — 36 — GB24 — — — — 36 Isomalt 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.4 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 CBD 52%* 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6.
Example 17
(181) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(182) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 12A was made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. The tableted chewing gum had a weight of about 1.35 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the chewing gum.
(183) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 1H CG Number CG115 CG116 CG117 CG118 CG119 GB25 36 — — — — GB26 — 36 — — — GB27 — — 36 — — GB28 — — — 36 — GB29 — — — — 36 Isomalt 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.4 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 CBD 52%* 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6.
Example 18
(184) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(185) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 12A (CG120-121) and 12B (CG122-123) was made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. One reference example was made with extruded chewing gum made by rolling and scoring according to conventional principles (CG124). The chewing gum had a weight of about 1.35 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the chewing gum.
(186) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 1I CG Number CG120 CG121 CG122 CG123 CG124* GB10 36 36 36 36 36 Isomalt 40.6 56.4 40.6 56.4 56.4 Talc 15.8 — 15.8 — — Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 CBD 52%* 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6. CG124 is a reference example made by rolling and scoring (conventional extruded chewing gum).
Example 19
(187) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(188) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 12A was made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. The tableted chewing gum had a weight of about 1.35 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the chewing gum.
(189) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 1J CG Number CG125 CG126 CG127 CG128 CG129 GB10 62.4 52.4 42.4 32.4 22.4 Isomalt 30 40 50 60 70 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 CBD 52%* 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6.
Example 20
(190) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(191) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 13A (CG130-133) and 13B (CG134) were made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. The tableted chewing gum had a weight of about 1.6 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. The weight ratio of the two layers was 55 to 45 (gum base free layer to gum base layer) for CG130-133 and 50 to 50 for CG134. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the layer of the tableted chewing gum.
(192) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 1K CG Number CG130 CG131 CG132 CG133 CG134 Layer 1 GB10 36 60 60 80 36 Isomalt 58.9 34.9 32.2 14.9 58.9 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 1 1 1 1 1 CBD 52%* — — 2.7 — — Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6.
(193) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 1L CG Number CG130 CG131 CG132 CG133 CG134 Layer 2 GB10 — — — — — Isomalt 94.2 94.2 96.4 94.2 94.0 Menthol powder 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Eucalyptus Powder — — — — — Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 1 1 1 1 1 CBD 52%* 2.2 2.2 — 2.2 2.4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6.
Example 21
(194) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(195) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 13C (CG135-137) and 13D (CG138-139) were made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. The tableted chewing gum had a weight of about 1.6 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. The weight ratio of the two layers was 50 to 50 for CG135-137 and 35 to 30 to 35 for CG138-139. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the layer of the tableted chewing gum.
(196) TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 1M CG Number CG135 CG136 CG137 CG138 CG139 Layer 1 GB10 36 60 60 36 60 Isomalt 58.9 34.9 32.5 58.9 34.9 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 1 1 1 1 1 CBD 52%* — — 2.4 — — Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6.
(197) TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 1N CG Number CG135 CG136 CG137 CG138* CG139* Layer 2 (and 3*) GB10 36 36 36 — — Isomalt 56.5 56.5 58.9 94.7 94.7 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2.5 2.5 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 — — Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Processing aid 1 1 1 1 1 CBD 52%* 2.4 2.4 — 1.7 1.7 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6. It is noted that CG138* and CG139* were made with 3 layers, where layer 1 was the middle layer and layer 2 and 3 were located on opposite sides of layer 1. CG135-137 were made with two gum layers.
Example 22
(198) Composition of Tableted Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(199) Cannabinoid chewing gum based on the procedure in Example 12A was made with the formulations outlined in the examples below. The tableted chewing gum had a weight of about 1.35 g for each piece and a content of CBD of 10 mg for each piece. In all of the chewing gum examples, the amount of the various ingredients is given as % by weight of the chewing gum.
(200) TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 1 CG Number CG140 CG141 CG142 CG143 CG144 GB10 36 36 36 36 36 Isomalt 56.4 43.0 50.4 54.8 55.4 Menthol powder 2 2 2 2 2 Eucalyptus Powder 2 2 2 2 2 Acesulfame K 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sucralose 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Anti-sticking agent 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 CBD 52%* 1.4 — — — 1.4 CBD-MCC 5%* 13 14.8 — — CBD-MCC 10%* — — 7.4 — — CBD-cyclodex* — — — 3.0 — Self-emulsifying* — — — — 1 Total 100 100 100 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6. CBD-MCC 5%* was prepared according to Example 11. CBD-MCC 10%* was prepared according to Example 11 with a higher amount of CBD. CBD-cyclodex* is CBD-cyclodextrin complex prepared according to Example 10 and 25% loaded. Self-emulsifying* was prepared with a self-emulsifier, here polysorbate.
Example 23
(201) Coating of Tableted Chewing Gum
(202) A hard coating was prepared for selected samples with the following composition:
(203) TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 1P Hard coating Ingredients % by weight Number CG145 CG146 Maltitol 56.9 56.9 Water 22.7 24.8 Mannitol 11 11 gummi arabicum 4 4 Titandioxid 1 1 Polysorbate 0.1 0.1 CBD 52%* 4.3 CBD isolate* 2.2 Total 100 100 It was secured that CBD was thoroughly mixed into the premixture as outlined in Example 9. CBD 52%* was prepared according to Example 6. CBD isolate* was prepared according to Example 8. The coating was provided to samples of CG100 from Example 15.
(204) The coating was applied as a pre-heated suspension as outlined above to 1.35 g tableted chewing gum with the formulation of CG100 in Example 15, except that CBD 52% or CBD isolate was substituted with isomalt in CG100. Hence, CBD was not present in the tableted chewing gum, but only in the coating. A total of 10 mg CBD was present in the coated tablet. The suspension was applied in 3 subsequent steps according to conventional coating techniques to a total of 0.45 g coating to the 1.35 g tableted chewing gum. This corresponds to a ratio of tableted chewing gum to coating on 75:25.
Example 24
(205) In Vivo Testing of Release
(206) A sample was chewed with a chewing frequency of 60 chews pr. minute for 3 or 5 minutes in a test panel of 8 test persons. The test person was a healthy person appointed on an objective basis according to specified requirements. After 3 or 5 minutes, the content of CBD was measured in the remaining chewing gum residue. The chewing gum was subject to triple measurements for each of the 8 test persons, giving a total of 24 measurements for each sample. An average of the 24 measurements was calculated and the weight % release was calculated based on the original content of CBD in the sample. The content of CBD was measured in the remaining chewing gum residue. The chewing gum residue was positioned in a flask and weighted. Subsequently, an organic solvent was added for dissolution purposes, and the mixture was mixed on a laboratory shaker overnight. The organic phase was diluted and centrifuged. The supernatant was injected directly to an HPLC system and analyzed by an assay method.
Example 25
(207) In Vitro Testing of Release
(208) In vitro release of CBD was established by means of a chewing machine (Dissolution Test for Chewing Gums, General Monograph 2.9.25. In European Pharmacopoeia, 5th ed). A chewing chamber was filled with 20 ml buffer (phosphate buffer pH 7.4). The chewing gum sample was placed in the chamber and the chewing machine was initiated at 20 degrees Celsius with 1 chew per second. After 3 or 5 minutes of chewing, the machine was stopped and the chewing gum sample (residue) was placed in a vial. If more release time points are needed (release profile), the chewing buffer must be exchanged with 20 ml of fresh buffer every five minutes. The content of CBD was measured in the remaining chewing gum residue. The chewing gum residue was positioned in a flask and weighted. Subsequently, an organic solvent was added for dissolution purposes, and the mixture was mixed on a laboratory shaker overnight. The organic phase was diluted and centrifuged. The supernatant was injected directly into an HPLC system and analyzed by an assay method.
Example 26
(209) Stability Testing Method
(210) For stability testing, the ICH guideline is used; 25° C./60% RH (2 years), 30° C./65% RH (1 year), 40° C./75% RH (3 months). All samples were packed in duma bottles before stored in the conditions. All samples were sensorially and analytically evaluated. The content of CBD was measured in the remaining chewing gum residue. The chewing gum residue was positioned in a flask and weighted. Subsequently, an organic solvent was added for dissolution purposes, and the mixture was mixed on a laboratory shaker overnight. The organic phase was diluted and centrifuged. The supernatant was injected directly into an HPLC set-up and analyzed by an assay method. The following method was able to separate and quantify CBD, delta-9 THC, delta-8 THC and CBN.
Example 27
(211) CBD Delivered to the Oral Mucosa
(212) A sample was chewed in vivo with a chewing frequency of 60 chews pr. minute for 5 minutes in a test panel of 8 test persons. The test person was not allowed to swallow during the procedure. After one minute, saliva was obtained from the test person and collected in a vessel for later analysis. In tests for 5 minutes release, the same procedure was followed until 5 minutes where the last sample was collected and added to the same vessel for aggregated analysis. The test person was a healthy person appointed on an objective basis according to specified requirements. the aggregated saliva sample was collected after 5 minutes, the content of CBD was measured in the saliva. The content of CBD was also measured in the remaining chewing gum residue. The chewing gum residue was positioned in a flask and weighted. Subsequently, an organic solvent was added for dissolution purposes, and the mixture was mixed on a laboratory shaker overnight. The organic phase was diluted and centrifuged. The supernatant was injected directly into an HPLC system and analyzed by an assay method. The gum and saliva was subject to 3 triple measurements for each of the 8 test persons, giving a total of 24 measurement for each sample. An average of the 24 measurements was calculated and the weight % release was calculated. By comparing the amount of CBD in the remaining chewing gum residue and the amount of CBD in the saliva, the amount of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa could be estimated.
Example 28
(213) Sensorics Evaluation Test Set-Up
(214) Apart from release measurements, either in vivo or in vitro, as well as stability tests of the tableted chewing gum, sensorics tests were also performed to reveal very important characteristics and properties of the tableted chewing gum. These sensorics parameters are important as indicators of the structure of the chewing gum composition and the behavior of the gum when chewed. The structure is the underlying guidance as to how the chewing gum resembles the structure of a comparative chewing gum, which is set as the standard in the test series, i.e. the chewing gums are compared to each other in the test series of preferably 5 samples. The test set-up was composed of 8 test persons in a test panel. Each of the test persons were healthy individuals appointed on an objective basis according to specified requirements. The sensory analysis was performed according to ISO 4121-2003 in testing conditions following ISO 8589. The result is an average of the results of the 8 individuals.
(215) The test persons gave a rating from “+” to “+++++”, where “+” is poor and “+++++” is excellent and comparable to the standard, i.e. “+++++” means that the gum was comparable to the standard and “+” means that the gum was very far from comparable to the standard. “0” indicated that it was not tested.
(216) Five different parameters were tested in a test panel:
(217) TABLE-US-00017 Initial chew Texture Flavor Sweetness Off-notes
(218) “Initial chew”—the first impression of the gum when chewed within the first 30 seconds. For instance, a very hard and viscous structure gave a very low rating and a very brittle structure also gave a very low rating.
(219) “Texture”—the overall impression of the gum after 30 seconds of chewing gum or when the gum has gained the structure of a steady state. For instance, a very hard structure gave a very low rating and a very smooth structure also gave a very low rating.
(220) “Flavor”—the overall impression of the gum during chewing with respect to flavor. For instance, a very low flavor experience gave a very low rating and a too high flavor experience that was not comparable to the standard also gave a very low rating.
(221) “Sweetness”—the overall impression of the taste of the gum during chewing with respect to sweetness. For instance, if the sweetness was decreasing rapidly a very low rating was given and if the sweetness was too high giving an uncomfortable feeling a very low rating was also given.
(222) “Off-notes”—the overall impression of the off-note from the one or more cannabinoids in the composition during chewing. For instance, if off-notes (grass, bitter notes, irritation in the throat) were experienced in the throat, a low rating was given and if other uncomfortable sensations was experienced a low rating was also given.
Example 29
(223) Sensorics Evaluation of Cannabinoid Chewing Gum
(224) TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 2A Evaluation of Examples 14-22 according to Example 28. CG Initial chew Texture Flavor Sweetness Off-notes CG 100 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 101 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 102 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 103 ++++ +++ +++ +++ ++++ CG 104 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 105 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 106 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 107 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 108 ++++ +++ +++ +++ +++ CG 109 +++ ++++ ++++ +++ +++ CG 110 0 0 +++++ ++++ +++++ CG 111 0 0 ++++ +++++ +++++ CG 112 0 0 +++++ +++++ +++++ CG 113 0 0 ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 114 0 0 +++++ ++++ +++++ CG 115 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 116 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 117 ++ + ++ + ++++ CG 118 + + ++ + ++++ CG 119 ++ ++ +++ +++ ++++ CG 120 ++++ ++++ +++ +++ +++ CG 121 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 122 ++++ ++++ +++ +++ +++ CG 123 +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 124 ++ ++ +++ ++ ++ CG 125 +++ +++ ++++ +++ +++ CG 126 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ CG 127 +++++ +++++ +++++ +++++ ++++ CG 128 +++++ +++++ +++++ +++++ ++++ CG 129 ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ +++ CG 130 +++++ +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ CG 131 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ +++ CG 132 ++++ ++++ ++++ +++++ ++++ CG 133 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 134 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 135 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 136 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 137 ++++ ++++ +++ ++++ ++++ CG 138 +++++ +++++ +++ +++ ++++ CG 139 +++++ +++++ ++++ +++++ +++++ CG 140 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 141 +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 142 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ CG 143 +++++ +++++ +++++ ++++ +++ CG 144 +++++ +++++ +++++ ++++ +++
Example 30
(225) Release of Cannabinoid
(226) TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 2B Chewing gum samples from Example 14 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG100 CG101 CG102 CG103 CG104 3 minutes 39 37 40 34 30 5 minutes 43 42 44 38 36
(227) The result shows that in the outer end of the ranges according to the invention, the release was lower, but still acceptable (CG103 and CG104). However, the ranges should be seen combined, such that the range of each of elastomer plasticizers and natural resin contributes in combination to the overall effect and release properties of the chewing gum. Hence, if an amount in the end of the range for natural resin is applied, the amount of elastomer plasticizer may to some extend counteract the negative effect.
Example 31
(228) Release of Cannabinoid
(229) TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 2C Chewing gum samples from Example 15 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG105 CG106 CG107 CG108 CG109 3 minutes 38 39 43 33 31 5 minutes 43 44 45 37 35
(230) The result shows that in the outer end of the ranges according to the invention, the release was lower, but still acceptable (CG108 and CG109). However, the ranges should be seen combined, such that the range of each of elastomer plasticizers and natural resin contributes in combination to the overall effect and release properties of the chewing gum. Hence, if an amount in the end of the range for natural resin is applied, the amount of elastomer plasticizer may to some extend counteract the negative effect.
(231) The release of CG 110-114 was comparable to CG105-109.
Example 32
(232) Release of Cannabinoid
(233) TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 2D Chewing gum samples from Example 17 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG115 CG116 CG117 CG118 CG119 3 minutes 39 37 9 8 16 5 minutes 43 42 17 16 19
(234) The result is clear in the sense that addition of VA-VL to the composition provides a much lower release (CG 117-119) than by the use of the polymers and natural resin according to the present invention. In addition, the sensorics properties by the use of VA-VL (see above) also makes it clear that VA-VL is not preferred.
Example 33
(235) Release of Cannabinoid
(236) TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 2E Chewing gum samples from Example 18 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG120 CG121 CG122 CG123 CG124 3 minutes 31 39 30 38 10 5 minutes 34 43 35 41 14
(237) The addition of talc to the composition was expected to give a higher release of CBD since it was expected that talc would provide a more porous structure to the tableted chewing gum and thereby promote better release of CBD. However, this was not seen (CG120 and CG122) and it appears that the amount of sugar alcohols is more important for release characteristics than previously expected. With respect to the extruded gum reference example (CG124), it is seen that the release properties were significantly lower than the examples according to the invention.
Example 34
(238) Release of Cannabinoid
(239) TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 2F Chewing gum samples from Example 19 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG125 CG126 CG127 CG128 CG129 3 minutes 30 35 39 40 44 5 minutes 34 41 43 46 56
(240) The results shows that a low amount of sugar alcohol in the gum (CG125) has an effect on the release of cannabinoids and that a higher amount was desirable. However, a too high amount of sugar alcohol (CG129) affected other properties of the chewing gum as seen in the sensorics results which was not expected. It is noted that the release properties should be seen in combination with the sensorics properties.
Example 35
(241) Release of Cannabinoid
(242) TABLE-US-00024 TABLE 2G Chewing gum samples from Example 20 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG130 CG131 CG132 CG133 CG134 3 minutes 65 60 48 54 66 5 minutes 68 63 54 58 70
(243) The result shows that the best release rate was obtained with a formulation of CG130 and CG134. In these examples, the gum base content was lower than in CG131 and CG133. When CBD was located in the gum layer, the release was somewhat lower (CG132).
Example 36
(244) Release of Cannabinoid
(245) TABLE-US-00025 TABLE 2H Chewing gum samples from Example 21 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG135 CG136 CG137 CG138 CG139 3 minutes 37 34 32 71 65 5 minutes 41 38 33 75 71
(246) Generally, a slightly lower release was obtained when the content of gum base was increased, both in the two-layered tableted chewing gum and in the three-layered tableted chewing gum.
Example 37
(247) Release of Cannabinoid
(248) TABLE-US-00026 TABLE 21 Chewing gum samples from Example 22 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG140 CG141 CG142 CG143 CG144 3 minutes 39 17 19 46 49 5 minutes 43 21 25 52 58
(249) The overall result shows that release promoting systems, such as a cyclodextrin complex with CBD (CG143) or self-emulsifiers systems (CG144), may be a particular advantage according to the invention if a higher release is desirable. However, the use of microcrystalline cellulose as a carrier in a 10% MCC-system (CG142) did provide a lower overall release which was even lower for a 5% MCC-system (CG141).
Example 38
(250) Coating with CBD
(251) TABLE-US-00027 TABLE 3A Chewing gum samples from Example 23 was tested for release after 3 or 5 minutes of in vitro chewing according to the test method of Example 25. The value indicates weight % of cannabinoid released from the chewing gum sample (CG). CG Number CG145 CG146 3 minutes 60 55 5 minutes 59 61
(252) The result was highly surprising since it was expected that a major amount of CBD from the coating was absorbed in the chewing gum upon chewing. However, the result shows that application of one or more cannabinoids into a coating, such as a hard coating, may be a promising way to deliver cannabinoids. Also, by combining the application of one or more cannabinoids in the coating as well as in the tableted chewing gum, controlled release of cannabinoids may be obtained. This may also be used to provide a biphasic release of cannabinoids, such that an initial high release is provided by the coating and a more sustained release is provided by incorporating the cannabinoids in the tableted chewing gum.
Example 39
(253) CBD Delivered to the Oral Mucosa
(254) Tests were conducted in accordance with the test method of Example 27. The tests were performed for CG100 and CG101. The values for the CBD content in saliva and in the chewing gum residue were measured after 5 min of chewing. From these values, the content of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa could be calculated.
(255) TABLE-US-00028 TABLE 3B Chewing gum samples from Example 14 were tested for content of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa after 5 minutes of in vivo chewing according to the test method of Example 27. The values indicate weight % of cannabinoid based on the one or more cannabinoids present in the initial formulation. CG Number CG100 CG101 CBD in saliva 11 9 CBD in residue 57 58 CBD delivered to mucosa 32 33
(256) The results of the tests were very surprising as a major part of the CBD released after 5 minutes of chewing was delivered to the oral mucosa. It was expected that a much higher amount of CBD was present in the saliva after 5 minutes of chewing, but only a relatively low amount of CBD was found in the saliva. Hence, the chewing gum formulation of the invention is very suitable for delivery of cannabinoids to the oral mucosa, much better than would have been expected.
Example 40
(257) CBD Delivered to the Oral Mucosa
(258) Tests were conducted in accordance with the test method of Example 27. The tests were performed for CG130 and CG131. The values for the CBD content in saliva and in the chewing gum residue were measured after 5 min of chewing. From these values, the content of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa could be calculated.
(259) TABLE-US-00029 TABLE 3C Chewing gum samples from Example 20 were tested for content of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa after 5 minutes of in vivo chewing according to the test method of Example 27. The values indicate weight % of cannabinoid based on the one or more cannabinoids present in the initial formulation. CG Number CG130 CG131 CBD in saliva 23 22 CBD in residue 32 34 CBD delivered to mucosa 45 44
(260) The results of the tests were very surprising as a major part of the CBD released after 5 minutes of chewing was delivered to the oral mucosa. It was expected that a much higher amount of CBD was present in the saliva after 5 minutes of chewing, but only a relatively low amount of CBD was found in the saliva. Hence, the chewing gum formulation of the invention is very suitable for delivery of cannabinoids to the oral mucosa, much better than would have been expected.
Example 41
(261) CBD Delivered to the Oral Mucosa
(262) Tests were conducted in accordance with the test method of Example 27. The tests were performed for CG135 and CG136. The values for the CBD content in saliva and in the chewing gum residue were measured after 5 min of chewing. From these values, the content of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa could be calculated.
(263) TABLE-US-00030 TABLE 3D Chewing gum samples from Example 21 were tested for content of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa after 5 minutes of in vivo chewing according to the test method of Example 27. The values indicate weight % of cannabinoid based on the one or more cannabinoids present in the initial formulation. CG Number CG135 CG136 CBD in saliva 8 7 CBD in residue 59 62 CBD delivered to mucosa 33 31
(264) The results of the tests were very surprising as a major part of the CBD released after 5 minutes of chewing was delivered to the oral mucosa. It was expected that a much higher amount of CBD was present in the saliva after 5 minutes of chewing, but only a relatively low amount of CBD was found in the saliva. Hence, the chewing gum formulation of the invention is very suitable for delivery of cannabinoids to the oral mucosa, much better than would have been expected.
Example 42
(265) CBD Delivered to the Oral Mucosa
(266) Tests were conducted in accordance with the test method of Example 27. The tests were performed for CG145 and CG146. The values for the CBD content in saliva and in the chewing gum residue were measured after 5 min of chewing. From these values, the content of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa could be calculated.
(267) TABLE-US-00031 TABLE 3E Chewing gum samples from Example 23 were tested for content of CBD delivered to the oral mucosa after 5 minutes of in vivo chewing according to the test method of Example 27. The values indicate weight % of cannabinoid based on the one or more cannabinoids present in the initial formulation. CG Number CG145 CG146 CBD in saliva 28 31 CBD in residue 41 39 CBD delivered to mucosa 31 30
(268) The results of the tests were surprising as a very high amount of CBD released after 5 minutes of chewing was delivered to the oral mucosa. It was expected that a much higher amount of CBD was present in the saliva after 5 minutes of chewing. It was not expected that such a high content of CBD could be delivered to the oral mucosa with the present chewing gum formulation. In fact, the content of CBD would be higher if polysorbate was not applied in the coating suspension since polysorbate facilitates emulsifying properties of the saliva which prevent CBD to be delivered to the oral mucosa to an even higher degree.
(269) By varying the content of CBD in the coating and the content of CBD in the chewing gum, a controlled delivery system may be established.