NEURONAL REGENERATION-PROMOTING CELL (NRPC), METHOD OF MAKING NRPC AND METHOD OF TREATING NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to method for screening mesenchymal stem cell-derived, neuronal regeneration-promoting cells having neuronal regeneration activity and a pharmaceutical composition containing the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells. The neuronal regeneration-promoting cells of the present disclosure are completely different from stem cells in terms of the expression pattern of a CD marker and exhibit an excellent neuronal regeneration effect. Accordingly, they can be applied in various fields for preventing or treating neurological diseases.

Claims

1-15. (canceled)

16. Neuronal regeneration-promoting cells (NRPCs) induced from tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (tonsil-derived MSCs) and expressing CD106, CD112, CD121a, CD26, and CD141.

17. The NRPCs of claim 16, wherein expression of CD121a is upregulated compared to the tonsil-derived MCSs, wherein expression of each of CD106 and CD112 is upregulated compared to the tonsil-derived MSCs, wherein expression of each of CD26 and CD141a is downregulated compared to the tonsil-derived MSCs.

18. The NRPCs of claim 16, wherein expression of CD121a is upregulated by more than 30% compared to the tonsil-derived MCSs, wherein expression of each of CD106 and CD112 is upregulated by more than 10% compared to the tonsil-derived MSCs, wherein expression of each of CD26 and CD141a is downregulated by more than 5% compared to the tonsil-derived MSCs.

19. The NRPCs of claim 16, wherein expression of CD121a is upregulated by more than 30% compared to the tonsil-derived MSCs.

20. The NRPCs of claim 16, wherein expression of each of CD106 and CD112 is upregulated by more than 10% compared to the tonsil-derived MSCs.

21. The NRPCs of claim 16, wherein expression of each of CD26 and CD141a is downregulated by more than 5% compared to the tonsil-derived MSCs.

22. The NRPCs of claim 16, wherein the NRPCs are configured to facilitate formation of axons in nerve cells.

23. The NRPCs of claim 16, wherein the NRPCs are configured to facilitate myelination in nerve cells.

24. A method of producing the NRPCs of claim 16, the method comprising: culturing the tonsil-derived MSCs to form neurospheres; culturing the neurosphere in at least one culture medium for inducing into the NRPCs; and screening the NRPCs from cells from the at least one culture medium.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein screening comprises conducting flow cytometry for at least part of the cells from the at least one culture medium to provide an expression level of at least one of CD26, CD106, CD112, CD121a, and CD141.

26. The method of claim 24, wherein screening comprises: co-culturing at least part of the cells from the at least one culture and Dorsal root ganglia cells, and confirming myelination on at least part of the Dorsal root ganglia cells.

27. A method of treating a neurological disease, the method comprising: administering a composition comprising the NRPCs of claim 16 in an effective amount to a subject in need of such treatment for causing myelination of peripheral nerves.

28. A method of treating a neurological disease, the method comprising: administering a composition comprising the NRPCs of claim 17 in an effective amount to a subject in need of such treatment for causing myelination of peripheral nerves.

29. A method of treating a neurological disease, the method comprising: administering a composition comprising the NRPCs of claim 18 in an effective amount to a subject in need of such treatment for causing myelination of peripheral nerves.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0067] FIG. 1 shows the images of neuronal regeneration-promoting cells induced from the tonsil-derived T-MSC-1-1 mesenchymal stem cells.

[0068] FIG. 2 shows heat maps visualizing the expression of CD markers in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells according to the present disclosure through CD marker screening.

[0069] FIGS. 3a and 3b show a result of screening CD markers showing difference in the expression level of neuronal regeneration-promoting cells as compared to tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells. FIG. 3a shows a result of comparing the CD markers the expression level of which has increased as compared to tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells, and FIG. 3b shows a result of comparing the CD markers the expression level of which has decreased as compared to tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

[0070] FIG. 4 shows a result of comparing the expression pattern of the CD markers the expression of which has increased and the CD markers the expression of which has decreased in neuronal regeneration-promoting cells as compared to tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

[0071] FIG. 5 shows a result of screening the CD markers the expression of which has increased or decreased in neuronal regeneration-promoting cells.

[0072] FIG. 6 shows a result of comparing the expression pattern of the markers CD121a, CD106 and CD112 the expression of which has increased in neuronal regeneration-promoting cells as compared to tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

[0073] FIG. 7 shows a result of comparing the expression pattern of the markers CD26 and CD141 the expression of which has decreased in neuronal regeneration-promoting cells as compared to tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

[0074] FIG. 8 shows a result of comparing the expression pattern of CD markers in tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (T-MSCs) and neuronal regeneration-promoting cells (NRPCs) using heat maps.

[0075] FIG. 9 shows a result of conducting neurite outgrowth assay to compare the growth of neurites from neuronal regeneration-promoting cells.

[0076] FIG. 10 shows that myelination was achieved cytomorphologically in some of the candidate cells co-cultured with dorsal root ganglia.

[0077] FIG. 11 shows a result of conducting flow cytometry for up-regulated and down-regulated CD markers screened by CD screening using individual antibodies.

[0078] FIG. 12 shows a result of visualizing the cytokine array assay of T-MSCs and NRPCs using heat maps (left) and the proportion of the cytokines increased in NRPCs as compared to the T-MSCs (right) (fold change: NRPC 1-1/T-MSC 1-1, NRPC 1-2/T-MSC 1-2).

[0079] Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in more detail through examples. The examples are provided only to describe the present disclosure more specifically and it will be obvious to those having ordinary knowledge in the art that the scope of the present disclosure is not limited by the examples.

EXAMPLES

Example 1. Preparation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

[0080] 1-1. Isolation and Culturing of Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

[0081] Left and right tonsil tissues derived from many donors acquired from Ewha Womans University College of Medicine were separated and put in a tube holding 10 mL of DPBS (Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline) supplemented with 20 μg/mL gentamicin, centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes and then washed twice. The washed tonsil issues were sliced using sterilized scissors.

[0082] In order to isolate tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells from the tonsil issues, after adding an enzymatic reaction solution of the same weight, the tonsil issues were incubated in a shaking incubator at 37° C. and 200 rpm for 60 minutes. The composition of the enzymatic reaction solution is described in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Final concentration Ingredients 2 mg/mL Trypsin 1.2 U/mL Dispase 1 mg/mL Type 1 collagenase 20 μg/mL DNase 1 — HBSS (Hank's balanced salt solution)

[0083] After adding 5% FBS (fetal bovine serum) to the culture, the mixture was centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes. After the centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and the remaining pellets were resuspended in 30 mL of DPBS and then centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes. After the centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and the remaining pellets were resuspended in 10 mL of DPBS to prepare a suspension. The suspension was passed through a 100-μm filter. The tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells remaining in the filter were washed with 20 mL of DPBS and then centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes. After the centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and incubation was performed in a constant-temperature water bath at 37° C. for 5 minutes after adding an ACK lysis buffer. After adding DPBS to the suspension, centrifugation was conducted at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes. After the centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and the remaining pellets were resuspended in high-glucose DMEM (10% FBS, 20 μg/mL gentamicin) to prepare a cell suspension. Then, the number of cells in the prepared cell suspension was counted. The cell suspension was seeded in a T175 flask and incubated at 37° C. in a 5% CO.sub.2 incubator.

[0084] 1-2. Isolation and Culturing of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

[0085] Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells were purchased from Lonza (human adipose-derived stem cells, Cat #PT-5006, Lonza, Switzerland). The adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells were cultured using a medium provided by Lonza (Bulletkit ADSD, Cat #PT-4505).

Example 2. Formation of Neurospheres

[0086] Neurospheres were formed by culturing the mesenchymal stem cells of Example 1. Specifically, the mesenchymal stem cells were subcultured to 4-7 passages. After removing the culture medium, the mesenchymal stem cells were washed with DPBS. After treating the washed cells with TrypLE, the harvested cells were counted. After centrifuging the harvested cells and removing the supernatant, they were resuspended in a neurosphere formation medium. The composition of the neurosphere formation medium is described in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Final concentration Ingredients — DMEM/F12 with GlutaMAX 20 ng/ml Basic fibroblast growth factor 20 ng/mL Epidermal growth factor 1× B27 supplement 20 μg/mL Gentamicin

[0087] The cells resuspended in the neurosphere (1×10.sup.6 cells) formation medium were seeded on an ultra-low attachment dish (60 mm). The seeded cells were cultured for 3 days under the condition of 37° C. and 5% CO.sub.2. After the culturing for 3 days, the neurospheres formed on the dish were collected in a 15-mL tube. After centrifuging the collected cells and removing the supernatant, a neurosphere suspension was prepared by adding a fresh neurosphere formation medium. The neurosphere suspension was transferred to an ultra-low attachment dish and the neurospheres were cultured for 4 days under the condition of 37° C. and 5% CO.sub.2.

Example 3. Differentiation into Candidate Cells of Neuronal Regeneration-Promoting Cells (NRPCs) Using Neurospheres

[0088] The neurospheres formed in Example 2 were crushed finely using a 23-26G syringe needle. The crushed neurospheres were transferred to a 15-mL tube using a pipette and then centrifuged. After removing the supernatant, the crushed neurospheres were resuspended by adding a neuronal regeneration-promoting cell induction medium to the tube. Various neuronal regeneration-promoting cell induction media were prepared by combining three or more of 1) 5-20% FBS (fetal bovine serum), 2) 5-20 ng/mL bFGF (Peprotech, USA), 3) 100-400 μM butylated hydroxyanisole (Sigma, USA), 4) 5-40 μM forskolin (MedCheExpress, USA), 5) 0.1-10% N2 supplement (GIBCO, USA), 6) 1-100 ng/mL brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 7) 1-100 ng/mL nerve growth factor (NGF, Santa Cruz, USA), 8) 0.01-1 ng/mL sonic hedgehog (SHH, R & D Systems, USA), 9) 1-10 ng/mL PDGF-AA (platelet-derived growth factor-AA, Peprotech, USA) and 10) 50-300 ng/mL heregulin-beta1, Peprotech, USA) in DMEM/F12 containing GlutaMAX.

[0089] The neurospheres resuspended in the various media were seeded onto a T175 flask coated with laminin (2 μg/mL). The seeded neurospheres were cultured for 8-days while exchanging the neuronal regeneration-promoting cell induction medium at 3-day intervals (FIG. 1).

Example 4. First Screening of Candidate Cells of Neuronal Regeneration-Promoting Cells Through Confirmation of Myelination of Peripheral Nerves

[0090] It was investigated whether the neuronal regeneration-promoting cell candidates prepared in Example 3 have the ability of myelinating peripheral nerves. Specifically, the differentiated neuronal regeneration-promoting cell candidates were co-cultured with dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and it was investigated whether myelination occurred.

[0091] Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells isolated from rats were purchased from Lonza (rat dorsal root ganglion cells, Cat #R-DRG-505, Lonza, Switzerland). The candidate cells were co-cultured with the purchased dorsal root ganglia. The DRG cells were cultured using a culture medium provided by Lonza (primary neuron growth medium bullet kit (PNGM), Cat #CC-4461).

[0092] The culture medium was exchanged every 3 days. As a result of co-culturing the candidate cells with the dorsal root ganglia, it was confirmed that myelination was achieved cytomorphologically in some of the cells (FIG. 10).

Example 5. Second Screening of Neuronal Regeneration-Promoting Cells Through Analysis of CD Marker Expression

[0093] The expression of a total of 242 CD markers was analyzed in T-MSC-1-1 (tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells 1), T-MSC-1-2 (tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells 2), T-MSC-1-3 (tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells 3) and T-MSC-1-4 (tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells 4), wherein myelination was confirmed cytomorphologically among the neuronal regeneration-promoting cell candidates in Example 4, and neuronal regeneration-promoting cells differentiated therefrom.

[0094] For the analysis of CD markers, 3×10.sup.7 target cells were collected. The target cell were washed with DPBS and then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. After removing the supernatant and washing once with DPBS, centrifugation was conducted and the remaining pellets were resuspended in 30 mL of a FACS buffer. 100 μL of the cell suspension (1×10.sup.5 cells) was seeded in each well of a round-bottomed 96-well plate. Then, 10 μL of primary antibodies of CD markers were added to each well of the 96-well plate. After reaction for 30 minutes on ice with the light blocked, each well was washed with 100 μL of a FACS buffer and then centrifugation was performed at 300 g for 5 minutes. After removing the supernatant and adding 200 μL of a FACS buffer to each well, centrifugation was performed at 300 g for 5 minutes. Secondary antibodies were prepared in a FACS buffer at a ratio of 1:200 (1.25 μg/mL). After the centrifugation was completed, the supernatant was removed and then 100 μL of the prepared secondary antibodies were added to each well. After reaction for 20-30 minutes on ice with the light blocked, each well was washed with 100 μL of a FACS buffer and then centrifugation was performed at 300 g for 5 minutes. After removing the supernatant, the target cells were washed by adding 200 μL of a FACS buffer to each well. The washing procedure was repeated twice. After the washing, the cells were resuspended by adding 200 μL of a FACS buffer to each well and the expression of CD markers in the target cells was investigated by flow cytometry or FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting).

[0095] The result of comparing the expression of CD markers in the induced neuronal regeneration-promoting cells using heat maps is shown in FIG. 2. As shown in FIG. 2, the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells (NRPCs) and the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) showed similar CD marker expression patterns but showed difference in the expression pattern of some markers.

[0096] The CD marker expression pattern of the T-MSC-1-1, T-MSC-1-2, T-MSC-1-3 and T-MSC-1-4 mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells (NRPCs) was compared to select the CD markers the expression of which has increased or decreased as differentiation markers of neuronal regeneration-promoting cells. The CD markers the expression of which has increased or decreased are shown in FIG. 3.

[0097] As shown in FIG. 3a, the CD markers the expression of which has increased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1, T-MSC-1-2, T-MSC-1-3 and T-MSC-1-4 (in at least three of the four NRPCs) as compared to the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells were CD10, CD39, CD106, CD112, CD121a, CD338, etc. And, as shown in FIG. 3b, the CD markers the expression of which has decreased (in at least three of the four NRPCs) were CD26 CD54, CD126, CD141, etc.

[0098] The result of comparing the increase and decrease of the CD markers in the tonsil-derived neuronal regeneration-promoting cells is shown in FIG. 4.

[0099] As shown in FIG. 4, the expression of 12 CD markers was increased and the expression of 9 CD markers was decreased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1. And, the expression of 8 CD markers was increased and the expression of 9 CD markers was decreased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-2. The expression of 40 CD markers was increased and the expression of 3 CD markers was decreased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-3. The expression of 17 CD markers was increased and the expression of 6 CD markers was decreased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-4.

[0100] From the above results, the CD markers the expression of which has increased or decreased commonly in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1, T-MSC-1-2, T-MSC-1-3 and T-MSC-1-4 were screened. The screened markers are as follows: [0101] The CD markers the expression of which has increased commonly: CD106, CD112 and CD121a. [0102] The CD markers the expression of which has decreased commonly: CD26 and CD141.

[0103] The pattern of the CD markers the expression of which has increased or decreased commonly was observed identically also in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells differentiated from the adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells of Example 1-2.

[0104] The CD screening result of the CD markers the expression of which has increased or decreased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1, T-MSC-1-2, T-MSC-1-3 and T-MSC-1-4 is shown in FIG. 5.

[0105] As shown in FIG. 5, the expression level of the CD markers the expression of which has increased commonly in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells, i.e., CD121a, CD106 and CD112, has increased by 10% or more after the differentiation. Meanwhile, the expression level of the markers the expression of which has decreased commonly, i.e., CD26 and CD141, had decreased by about 9% or more. This result suggests that the markers CD121a, CD106, CD112, CD26 and CD141 expression of which has changed commonly can be used as differentiation markers of neuronal regeneration-promoting cells. Especially, CD121a, CD106 and CD112 can be used as representative differentiation markers.

[0106] 6-1. Comparison of Expression of Co-Expression Markers CD121a, CD106 and CD112

[0107] The expression of the markers CD121a, CD106 and CD112 has increased commonly in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1, T-MSC-1-2, T-MSC-1-3 and T-MSC-1-4 by 10% or more as compared to the mesenchymal stem cells, which is the most prominent feature of the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells. The result of comparing the expression of the markers CD121a, CD106 and CD112 in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1, T-MSC-1-2, T-MSC-1-3 and T-MSC-1-4 is shown in FIG. 6.

[0108] As shown in FIG. 6, the expression of the markers CD121a, CD106 and CD112 was increased remarkably in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells (NRPCs) as compared to the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (T-MSCs).

[0109] 6-2. Comparison of Expression of Co-Expression Markers CD26 and CD141

[0110] The expression of the markers CD26 and CD141 had decreased commonly in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1, T-MSC-1-2, T-MSC-1-3 and T-MSC-1-4. The result of comparing the expression of the CD markers in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1, T-MSC-1-2, T-MSC-1-3 and T-MSC-1-4 is shown in FIG. 7.

[0111] As shown in FIG. 7, the expression of CD26 and CD141 was decreased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells as compared to the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

[0112] 6-3. Comparison of Expression Pattern of CD Markers

[0113] In order to compare the CD marker expression pattern in the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells and the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells, heat maps were constructed based on the result of comparing the expression of the co-expression CD markers in Examples 6-1 and 6-2. The result is shown in FIG. 8.

[0114] As shown in FIG. 8, the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells showed different expression of the co-expression markers from the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

[0115] 6-4. Average Expression of Co-Expression CD Markers

[0116] In order to investigate whether the expression pattern of the CD markers in the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells and the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells is maintained after freezing of the cells, the expression of the co-expression CD markers in live cells, frozen cells and thawed cells was confirmed. The result is shown in FIG. 11.

[0117] As shown in FIG. 11, the expression of CD106, CD121a and CD112 was increased and the expression of CD26 and CD141 was decreased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells as compared to the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cell even after freezing. The neuronal regeneration-promoting cells showed different expression of the co-expression markers from the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells regardless of freezing.

Example 7. Neurite Outgrowth Effect of Neuronal Regeneration-Promoting Cells

[0118] The neurite (or neuronal process), which projects from the cell body of a neuron, is known to be involved in the transport of the substances necessary for growth and regeneration of axons, neurotransmitters, nerve growth factors, etc. (L McKerracher et al., Spinal Cord Repair: Strategies to Promote Axon Regeneration, Neurobiol Dis, 2001). Neurite outgrowth assay was conducted to compare neurite growth in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells of the present disclosure.

[0119] N1E-115 cells (mouse neuroblastoma cells, ATCC, USA) were cultured and seeded on a microporous filter (neurite outgrowth assay kit, Millipore, USA). The seeded cells were cultured for 48 hours in a culture medium from which the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells or the stem cells were collected. Absorbance was measured after staining the neurites projected through a fine porous filter. It was confirmed from the neurite outgrowth assay that the culture of the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells regulate or stimulate the growth of neurites (axons) in the N1E-115 (mouse neuroblastoma) cells.

[0120] The growth of neurites in the N1E-115 cells cultured with the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-2 was compared. The result is shown in FIG. 9 (NRPCs: neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-2, T-MSCs: T-MSC-1-2, Negative control: negative control group, Positive control: positive control group). A large number of neurites was observed in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells as compared to the tonsil-derived stem cells, and absorbance was also increased in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells as compared to the tonsil-derived stem cells (Negative control: a porous filter (membrane insert provided with a neurite outgrowth assay kit) was coated with BSA and N1E-115 cells were cultured in DMEM (+20 μg/mL gentamicin). Positive control: a porous filter was coated with laminin and N1E-115 cells were cultured in DMEM (+20 μg/mL gentamicin+1 mg/mL BSA). NRPC and T-MSC groups: a porous filter was coated with BSA and N1E-115 cells were cultured in a culture of NRPCs or T-MSCs).

Example 8. Cytokine Array Assay of Neuronal Regeneration-Promoting Cells

[0121] The expression of 507 cytokines was analyzed in T-MSC-1-1 and T-MSC-1-2, which showed the most prominent myelination in Example 4, and the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells differentiated therefrom.

[0122] The target cells were cultured for analysis of the cytokines. The target cells were seeded in a flask and cultured for 3-4 days. When the target cells filled 80% or more of the area of the flask, the culture medium was removed and the target cells were washed twice with DPBS. After the washing, the culture medium was replaced with DMEM (Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline) not containing FBS (fetal bovine serum), cytokines, etc. in order to rule out the effect of cytokines. The culture of the target cells was collected after culturing for 30 hours.

[0123] The collected culture was centrifuged at 3,600 rpm for 30 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to a centrifugal tube equipped with a cellulose membrane and concentrated by centrifuging at 3,600 rpm for 20 minutes. After the centrifugation, the conditioned medium that passed through the separation membrane was discarded and the culture of the same amount was added. The centrifugation was continued until the volume of the concentrated culture was decreased to 1 mL or below, and the concentrated culture was quantified by Bradford assay. The concentrated culture was adjusted to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL by mixing with DMEM.

[0124] A membrane coated with antibodies capable of detecting 507 cytokines (cytokine array kit, RayBiotech, USA) was reacted for 30 minutes by treating with a blocking buffer. After removing the blocking buffer remaining on the membrane and replacing with the concentrated culture, the membrane was reacted overnight in a refrigerator. The membrane was washed 7 times with a washing buffer. After adding a HRP-conjugated streptavidin solution, the membrane was reacted at room temperature for 2 hours. After removing the HRP-conjugated streptavidin solution, the membrane was washed 7 times with a washing buffer. After the washing, the membrane was soaked with an ECL (enhanced chemiluminescence) reagent and the expression of cytokines was confirmed using an imaging device.

[0125] The result of comparing the expression of cytokines in the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells using heat maps is shown in FIG. 12. As shown in FIG. 12, the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells and the tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells showed different expression patterns.

[0126] The cytokines the expression of which has increased in the mesenchymal stem cells and neuronal regeneration-promoting cells derived from T-MSC-1-1 and T-MSC-1-2 are shown in FIG. 12. [0127] 1.5 fold or more: angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-4, BIK, BMPR-IA/ALK-3, CCL14/HCC-1/HCC-3, CCR1, EN-RAGE, eotaxin-3/CCL26, FGF R4, FGF-10/KGF-2, FGF-19, FGF-21, Flt-3 Ligand, follistatin-like 1, GASP-1/WFIKKNRP, GCP-2/CXCL6, GFR alpha-3, GREMLIN, GRO-a, HGF, HRG-beta 1, I-309, ICAM-1, IFN-alpha/beta R2, IGFBP-2, IGF-I, IL-4, IL-5 R alpha, IL-10 R beta, IL-12 R beta 1, IL-13 R alpha 2, IL-20 R beta, IL-22 BP, IL-23 R, FACX, LIF, LIF R alpha, LIGHT/TNFSF14, lipocalin-1, lipocalin-2, LRP-1, MCP-4/CCL13, M-CSF, MDC, MFG-E8, MICA, MIP-1b, MIP-1d, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-10, MMP-12, MMP-16/MT3-MMP, MMP-25/MT6-MMP, NAP-2, NeuroD1, PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, PDGF-C, PDGF-D, pentraxin3/TSG-14, persephin, PF4/CXCL4, PLUNC, P-selectin, RANTES, RELM beta, ROBO4, S100A10, SAA, SCF, SIGIRR, Smad 1, Smad 5, Smad 8, Prdx6, Tarc, TCCR/WSX-1, TGF-beta 3, TGF-beta 5, Tie-2, TIMP-1, TROY/TNFRSF19, uPA [0128] 1.75 fold or more: angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-4, BIK, CCR1, FGF-21, GRO-a, HGF, IL-10 R beta, IL-12 R beta 1, MCP-4/CCL13, MIP-1b, MIP-1d, NeuroD1, PDGF-C, Prdx6, TIMP-1, uPA [0129] 2 fold or more: BIK, GRO-a, HGF, MCP-4/CCL13, uPA

[0130] To conclude, the inventors of the present disclosure have prepared neuronal regeneration-promoting cells from tonsil- and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and have investigated their expression pattern through CD marker assay. In addition, they have identified the neuronal regeneration effect of the neuronal regeneration-promoting cells. This suggests that the tonsil issues that have been discarded as medical wastes can be used to prepare cells having neuronal regeneration effect. The neuronal regeneration-promoting cells of the present disclosure can be utilized variously in the field of neuronal regeneration.

[0131] Although the specific exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure have been described, those having ordinary knowledge in the art can modify and change the present disclosure variously through the addition, change, deletion, etc. without departing from the scope of the present disclosure defined by the appended claims.