Phytase variants YeAPPA having improved gastric protein resistance and acid resistance, and increased catalytic efficiency

Abstract

The present invention relates to the field of genetic engineering, particularly to phytase variant YeAPPA having improved pepsin resistance and acid resistance, and increased catalytic efficiency, by substituting Leucine at the 162.sup.th site of the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO.1 with glycine or proline or substituting glutamic acid at the 230.sup.th site of the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO.1 with glycine, proline or arginine, in the benefit of the development of economical feed enzyme industry.

Claims

1. A phytase variant having phytase activity and comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, except the glutamate corresponding to position 230 of SEQ ID NO: 1 is replaced with glycine, proline or arginine, and wherein the phytase variant has improved pepsin resistance and acid resistance, and increased catalytic efficiency as compared to a phytase consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1.

2. A polynucleotide comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the phytase variant of claim 1.

3. The polynucleotide according to claim 2, wherein said polynucleotide comprises the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 10, SEQ ID NO: 11, or SEQ ID NO: 12.

4. A DNA construct comprising the polynucleotide of claim 2.

5. An isolated recombinant cell comprising the polynucleotide of claim 2.

6. A method of producing the phytase variant of claim 1, comprising the steps of transforming an isolated host cell with a DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide which comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding said phytase variant to obtain a recombinant host cell; cultivating the recombinant host cell to produce the phytase variant; and recovering the phytase variant.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows the comparison of effect of pepsin on activity of the modified phytase and the wild phytase.

(2) FIG. 2 shows the comparison of the acid resistance of the modified phytase and the wild phytase.

EMBODIMENT

(3) The present invention is further illustrated with reference to the following Examples and the appended drawings, which should by no means be construed as limitations of the present invention.

(4) Test Materials and Reagents

(5) 1. Strains and vectors: Expression vector pET-22b (+) and host strain BL21 (DE3) (INovagen).

(6) 2. Enzymes and other biochemical reagents: restriction endonucleases (TaKaRa), ligase (Invitrogen), and pepsin (p0685).

(7) 3. Medium:

(8) E. coli. LB medium: 1% of peptone, 0.5% of yeast extract, and 1% of NaCl, natural pH.

(9) Suitable biology laboratory methods not particularly mentioned in the examples as below can be found in Sambrook, et al. (Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd, ed, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989), and other kit laboratory manuals.

Example 1 Introduction of the Mutant Site to Wild Phytase

(10) Gene encoding phytase YeAPPA having the nucleotide sequence as set in SEQ ID NO. 2 was performed with site-directed mutagenesis by Overlap PCR to obtain the genes enconding phytase variants YeAPPA-L162G, YeAPPA-L162A, YeAPPA-E230G, YeAPPA-E230P and YeAPPA-E230R, respectively. Overlap PCR was performed as being kept at 95° C. for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94° C. for 30 sec, 55° C. for 30 sec, and 72° C. for 30-90 sec, and keep 72° C. for 10 min, with 12 mutation primers including the upper primer Ye-F and the reverse primer Ye-R for amplifying the foil length of mutant gene, and the primers comprising the EcoRI and NotI sites marked in Italics or the mutant nucleotides marked in underlined for site-directed mutagenesis showed as below.

(11) TABLE-US-00001 Ye-F/SEQ. ID. No. 13: 5′-cgcgaattcgccccgattgctacaccgcc-3′ Ye-R/SEQ. ID. No. 14: 5′-gatgcggccgcttaaatatggcaggctggctcga-3′ L162G-F/SEQ. ID. No. 15: 5′-cgggggtctgtaaaggcgactcagcgaaaac-3′ L162G-R/SEQ. ID. No. 16: 5′-gttttcgctgagtcgcctttacagacccccg-3′ L162A-F/SEQ. ID. No. 17: 5′-cgggggtctgtaaagcggactcagcgaaaac-3′ L162A-R/SEQ. ID. No. 18: 5′-gttttcgctgagtccgctttacagacccccg-3′ E230G-F/SEQ. ID. No. 19: 5′-ttaaggtaaacgaaggcggtactaaagtttc-3′ E230G-R/SEQ. ID. No. 20: 5′-gaaactttagtaccgccttcgtttaccttaa-3′ E230P-F/SEQ. ID. No. 21: 5′-ttaaggtaaacgaaccgggtactaaagtttc-3′ E230P-R/SEQ. ID. No. 22: 5′-gaaactttagtacccggttcgtttaccttaa-3′ E230R-F/SEQ. ID. No. 23: 5′-ttaaggtaaacgaacgtggtactaaagtttc-3′ E230R-R/SEQ. ID. No. 24: 5′-gaaactttagtaccacgttcgtttaccttaa-3′

(12) The modified gene is recovered, connected with the vector pEASY-T3, and sequenced.

Example 2 Preparing the Phytase Variants and Measuring their Activity

(13) The modified gene encoding the phytase variants were inserted into expression vector pET-22b (+), and transformed into E coli. Strain BL21 (DE3), which was induced by IPTG in 1 mM, cultivated for 5 h at 24° C. to express the phytase, followed by being purified by columns Ni-NTA and DEAE to obtain the mutant protein with the same molecular weight as that of the wild.

Example 3 Measuring Effect of Pepsin on the Enzyme Activity of the Phytase Variants

(14) Pepsin resistance of the phytase variants was measured by the remained activity and the amount of protein after being treated with different concentrations of pepsin.

(15) Determining Effect of Pepsin on Activity of the Phytase Variants

(16) The effect of pepsin on the activity of the purified mutant phytase was determined by detecting the remained activity after being treated in pH 2 for 2 hours with the different concentrations of pepsin in a mass ratio to phytase ranging from 1/1000 to 1/1. The activity of phytase was detected by ferric molybdenum sulfate blue method by adding 50 ul of phytase solution to 950 ul of sodium phytate substrate in 1.5 mmol/L to react for 30 min at 37° C., followed by adding 1 mL of 10% (m/v) TCA to stop the reaction, and 2 mL of developing color reagent. After developing, OD is measured at 700 nm to calculate the phytase activity. 1 unit of phytase activity is determined to be the enzyme amount releasing 1 μmol of phosphate for 1 minute. The absolute value of the measured phytase activity may be calculated based on the standard curve of inorganic phosphate in dilution. As showed by “A” and “B” of FIG. 1, the phytase variants remained more enzyme activity after being treated for 2 h with different concentration of pepsin, than that of the wild phytase, wherein the retained activity of the phytase variants YeAPPA-E230G, YeAPPA-E230P, YeAPPA-E230R, YeAPPA-L162G and YeAPPA-L162A were 30%, 22%, 17%, 17% and 10% in order, but the wild phytase almost lost activity, demonstrating that pepsin resistance of phytase variants were improved.

(17) Determining Effect of Pepsin on Stability of the Phytase Variants

(18) The effect of pepsin on the activity of the purified phytase variants was determined by detecting the retained phytase proteins by PAGE after being treated in pH 2 for 2 hours with the different concentrations of pepsin, and calculating the gray value of phytase protein bands. The amount of the retained phytase proteins after being treated with pepsin was represented by the ratio of the gray value of the retained phytase protein bands to that of the untreated, phytase bands. As showed in “A” and “B” of FIG. 2, the amounts of the retained protein of the phytase variants YeAPPA-E230G, YeAPPA-E230P, YeAPPA-E230R, YeAPPA-L162G and YeAPPA-L162A were more than that of the wild phytase with the ratio of 0.1, in case of being treated by pepsin in a ratio of 1/1000, and, the ratios of the gray value for the phytase variants YeAPPA-E230G, YeAPPA-E230P, YeAPPA-E230R, YeAPPA-L162G and YeAPPA-L162A were 0.54, 0.43, 0.33, 0.35, 0.25 in order, in case of being treated by pepsin in a ratio of 1/100. Therefore, the phytase variants of the present invention showed more retaining protein than that of the wild phytase after being treated with the different concentrations of pepsin, demonstrating that the phytase variants had the improve stability compare with the wild phytase.

Example 4 Determining Stability of the Phytase Variants

(19) (1) pH Stability

(20) The purified phytase variant was performed the enzymatic reactions in the substrate solutions with, the different pHs using 0.1 mol/L of Glycine-HCl buffer (pH1.0˜3.0), 0.1 mol/L of acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer (pH3˜6), 0.1 mol/L of Tris-HcI buffer (pH6˜8) and 0.1 mol/L of glycine-sodium hydroxide buffer (pH8˜12.0) at 37° C. to determine the optimal pH. As showed in Table 1, the optimal pH values of the phytase variants YeAPPA-E230G, YeAPPA-E230P, YeAPPA-L162G and YeAPPA-L162A were pH 5.0 being similar to that of the wild enzyme, other than the phytase variant YeAPPA-E230R decreased one pH unit in optimal pH value. And, the phytase variants YeAPPA-E230G, YeAPPA-E230P, YeAPPA-E230R, YeAPPA-L162G and YeAPPA-L162A retaining more than 18-32% of enzyme activity were more stable than the wild phytase retaining 12% of enzyme activity after being treated in pH 1.0 to 2.0 for 1 hour.

(21) (2) Thermostability

(22) The purified phytase variants were kept for 30 min at 30° C. to 80° C., respectively to determine their optimal temperatures. As list in Table 1, the optimal temperatures of the phytase variant YeAPPA-E230P was 50° C., which was 5° C. higher than those of the phytase variants YeAPPA-L162G, YeAPPA-L162A, YeAPPA-E230G, and YeAPPA-E230/R. And, phytase variants YeAPPA-E230P, YeAPPA-E230G and YeAPPA-E230R retaining 12%, 21% and 9% of enzyme activity were more thermostable than phytase variants YeAPPA-L162G, YeAPPA-L162A and the wild phytase losing all of enzyme activity after being kept for 30 min at 60° C. Therefore, phytase variants YeAPPA-E230P, YeAPPA-E230G and YeAPPA-E230R were more thermostable than the wild phytase.

(23) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 Comparison of the effect temperature and pH on the activity and stability of the modified phytase and the wild phytase pH stability of the Thermostability of Optimal Optimal phytaseafter being phytase kept for Variants pH temperature treated in different pHs 30 min at 60° C. YeAPPA 5 45° C. pH 1-2, <12, pH 3-9, >89 0.6% YeAPPA-L162G 5 45° C. pH 1-2, >20, pH 3-9, >99 0.6% YeAPPA-L162A 5 45° C. pH 1-2, >18, pH 3-9, >96 0.6% YeAPPA-E230G 5 45° C. pH 1-2, >32, pH 3-9, >100  21% YeAPPA-E230P 5 50° C. pH 1-2, >24, pH 3-9, >99  12% YeAPPA-E230R 4 45° C. pH 1-2, >30, pH 3-9, >99   9%

Example 5 Measuring Kinetic Parameter of the Phytase Variants

(24) The activity of phytase was measured with sodium phytate as substrate in different concentrations of 0.0625 mmol/L, 0.1 mmol/L, 0.125 mmol/L, 0.2 mmol/L, 0.25 mmol/L, 0.5 mmol/L, 1.0 mmol/L and 1.5 mmol/L at the optimal temperature and pH, followed by calculating the values of k.sub.m and V.sub.max double reciprocal method for Michaelis equation, and K.sub.cat according to the theoretical molecular weight. As showed in Table 2, the affinity to substrate (k.sub.m) of each of phytase variants was similar to that of the wild phytase. Reaction rate V.sub.max and conversion rate K.sub.cat of the phytase variant YeAPPA-E230G were greatly increased to 2.5 times of that of the wild phytase, and catalytic efficiency K.sub.cat/k.sub.m was 2.5 times of that of the wild phytase. Reaction rate V.sub.max and conversion rate K.sub.cat of the phytase variant YeAPPA-L162G were increased to 1.6 to 1.8 times of that of the wild phytase, and catalytic efficiency K.sub.cat/k.sub.m was 1.7 times of that of the wild phytase. And, reaction rate, conversion rate and catalytic efficiency of the phytase variants YeAPPA-L162A, YeAPPA-E230P and YeAPPA-E230R were almost same as those of the wild phytase.

(25) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Comparison of the enzymatic properties of the modified phytase and the wild phytase Phytase Km(mM) Vmax(U mg.sup.−1) Kcat(S.sup.−1) Kcat/Km(S.sup.−1 mM.sup.−1) YeAPPA 0.19 6.4 4.9 26 YeAPPA-L162G 0.19 11 8.2 43 YeAPPA-L162A 0.19 6.5 5.0 27 YeAPPA-E230G 0.19 16 12 64 YeAPPA-E230P 0.19 6.7 5.1 26 YeAPPA-E230R 0.18 6.3 4.8 26