DETECTING DAMAGE TO A GAS TURBINE ENGINE

20210317750 · 2021-10-14

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    A computer implemented method for detecting a damage to a gas turbine engine. The gas turbine engine includes a fan and a plurality of turbine stages including a low pressure turbine stage. The fan is drivably coupled to the low pressure turbine stage. The method includes receiving a first signal indicative of a speed of rotation of the fan. The method further includes receiving a second signal indicative of a speed of rotation of the low pressure turbine stage. The method further includes determining a difference metric representative of a difference between the speed of rotation of the fan and the speed of rotation of the low pressure turbine stage. The method further includes determining whether a damage event has occurred based on whether the difference metric passes a threshold.

    Claims

    1. A computer-implemented method for detecting damage to a gas turbine engine having a fan and a plurality of turbine stages including a low pressure turbine stage, the fan being drivably coupled to the low pressure turbine stage, the method comprising: receiving a first signal indicative of a speed of rotation of the fan; receiving a second signal indicative of a speed of rotation of the low pressure turbine stage; determining, based on the first signal and the second signal, a difference metric representative of a difference between the speed of rotation of the fan and the speed of rotation of the low pressure turbine stage; and determining whether a damage event has occurred based on whether the difference metric passes a threshold.

    2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the difference metric comprises determining a difference between the speed of rotation of the fan and the speed of rotation of the low pressure turbine stage.

    3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the difference metric comprises: time integrating the first signal indicative of the speed of rotation of the fan to produce a first integrated signal; time integrating the second signal indicative of the speed of rotation of the low pressure turbine stage to produce a second integrated signal; and determining a difference between the first integrated signal and the second integrated signal.

    4. The method of claim 1, wherein the threshold is a predetermined threshold for a gas turbine engine type corresponding to the gas turbine engine.

    5. The method of claim 1, wherein the threshold is adapted based on one or more current operating conditions of the gas turbine engine.

    6. The method of claim 1, wherein the threshold is adapted based on an engine history of the gas turbine engine.

    7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining an approximate impact energy associated with a damage event based on a magnitude of the difference metric.

    8. The method of claim 7, further comprising: approximating a size of an impact object associated with the damage event based on the determined impact energy.

    9. The method of claim 7, further comprising: categorising the damage event as one of a plurality of different possible types of damage event based on the determined approximate impact energy and/or the determined approximate size of the object.

    10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a third signal from an impact location detector indicating a location of an impact associated with a damage event; and categorising the damage event as one of a plurality of different possible types of damage event based at least in part on the location of the impact.

    11. The method of claim 1, further comprising: categorising the damage event as one of a plurality of different possible types of damage event based on a comparison of the difference metric and a plurality of different thresholds corresponding to the different types of damage event.

    12. The method of claim 1, further comprising: categorising the damage event as one of a plurality of different possible types of damage event based on a degree to which the difference metric passes the threshold.

    13. The method of claim 9, wherein the different types of damage event include one or more foreign object damage events and one or more domestic object damage events.

    14. The method of claim 13, wherein the one or more foreign object damage events include a bird strike.

    15. The method of claim 1, wherein, if the difference metric does not pass the threshold, the method further comprises: determining whether a non-damage event has occurred based on whether the difference metric passes a second threshold.

    16. The method of claim 15, further comprising categorising the non-damage event as one of a plurality of types of non-damage event.

    17. The method of claim 1, wherein the fan is drivably coupled to the low pressure turbine stage by a gearbox.

    18. A computer readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by one or more computers, causes the computers to perform the method of claim 1.

    19. A controller for an aircraft, the controller configured to perform the method of claim 1.

    20. An aircraft comprising: a gas turbine engine having a fan and a plurality of turbine stages including a low pressure turbine stage, the fan being drivably coupled to the low pressure turbine stage; and the controller according to claim 19.

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    [0062] Embodiments will now be described by way of example only, with reference to the Figures, in which:

    [0063] FIG. 1 is a sectional side view of a gas turbine engine;

    [0064] FIG. 2 is a close up sectional side view of an upstream portion of a gas turbine engine;

    [0065] FIG. 3 is a partially cut-away view of a gearbox for a gas turbine engine;

    [0066] FIG. 4A is a perspective view of a fan and turbine arrangement including a shaft;

    [0067] FIG. 4B is a perspective view of another fan and turbine arrangement including a gearbox;

    [0068] FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a system for detecting damage to a gas turbine engine;

    [0069] FIG. 6 is a schematic view of another system for detecting damage to a gas turbine engine;

    [0070] FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating a damage event;

    [0071] FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating a non-damage event;

    [0072] FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating different damage and non-damage events;

    [0073] FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating a variable threshold; and

    [0074] FIG. 11 is a flow chart of a method for detecting damage to a gas turbine engine.

    DETAILED DESCRIPTION

    [0075] Aspects and embodiments of the present disclosure will now be discussed with reference to the accompanying figures. Further aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

    [0076] FIG. 1 illustrates a gas turbine engine 10 having a principal rotational axis 9. The engine 10 comprises an air intake 12 and a propulsive fan 23 that generates two airflows: a core airflow A and a bypass airflow B. The gas turbine engine 10 comprises a core 11 that receives the core airflow A. The engine core 11 comprises, in axial flow series, a low pressure compressor 14, a high pressure compressor 15, combustion equipment 16, a high pressure turbine 17, a low pressure turbine 19 and a core exhaust nozzle 20. A nacelle 21 surrounds the gas turbine engine 10 and defines a bypass duct 22 and a bypass exhaust nozzle 18. The bypass airflow B flows through the bypass duct 22. The fan 23 is attached to and driven by the low pressure turbine 19 via a shaft 26 and an epicyclic gearbox 30.

    [0077] In use, the core airflow A is accelerated and compressed by the low pressure compressor 14 and directed into the high pressure compressor 15 where further compression takes place. The compressed air exhausted from the high pressure compressor 15 is directed into the combustion equipment 16 where it is mixed with fuel and the mixture is combusted. The resultant hot combustion products then expand through, and thereby drive, the high pressure and low pressure turbines 17, 19 before being exhausted through the core exhaust nozzle 20 to provide some propulsive thrust. The high pressure turbine 17 drives the high pressure compressor 15 by a suitable interconnecting shaft 27. The fan 23 generally provides the majority of the propulsive thrust. The epicyclic gearbox 30 is a reduction gearbox.

    [0078] An exemplary arrangement for a geared fan gas turbine engine 10 is shown in FIG. 2. The low pressure turbine 19 (see FIG. 1) drives the shaft 26, which is coupled to a sun wheel, or sun gear, 28 of the epicyclic gear arrangement 30. Radially outwardly of the sun gear 28 and intermeshing therewith is a plurality of planet gears 32 that are coupled together by a planet carrier 34. The planet carrier 34 constrains the planet gears 32 to process around the sun gear 28 in synchronicity whilst enabling each planet gear 32 to rotate about its own axis. The planet carrier 34 is coupled via linkages 36 to the fan 23 in order to drive its rotation about the engine axis 9. Radially outwardly of the planet gears 32 and intermeshing therewith is an annulus or ring gear 38 that is coupled, via linkages 40, to a stationary supporting structure 24.

    [0079] Note that the terms “low pressure turbine” and “low pressure compressor” as used herein may be taken to mean the lowest pressure turbine stages and lowest pressure compressor stages (i.e. not including the fan 23) respectively and/or the turbine and compressor stages that are connected together by the interconnecting shaft 26 with the lowest rotational speed in the engine (i.e. not including the gearbox output shaft that drives the fan 23). In some literature, the “low pressure turbine” and “low pressure compressor” referred to herein may alternatively be known as the “intermediate pressure turbine” and “intermediate pressure compressor”. Where such alternative nomenclature is used, the fan 23 may be referred to as a first, or lowest pressure, compression stage.

    [0080] The epicyclic gearbox 30 is shown by way of example in greater detail in FIG. 3. Each of the sun gear 28, planet gears 32 and ring gear 38 comprise teeth about their periphery to intermesh with the other gears. However, for clarity only exemplary portions of the teeth are illustrated in FIG. 3. There are four planet gears 32 illustrated, although it will be apparent to the skilled reader that more or fewer planet gears 32 may be provided within the scope of the claimed invention. Practical applications of a planetary epicyclic gearbox 30 generally comprise at least three planet gears 32.

    [0081] The epicyclic gearbox 30 illustrated by way of example in FIGS. 2 and 3 is of the planetary type, in that the planet carrier 34 is coupled to an output shaft via linkages 36, with the ring gear 38 fixed. However, any other suitable type of epicyclic gearbox 30 may be used. By way of further example, the epicyclic gearbox 30 may be a star arrangement, in which the planet carrier 34 is held fixed, with the ring (or annulus) gear 38 allowed to rotate. In such an arrangement the fan 23 is driven by the ring gear 38. By way of further alternative example, the gearbox 30 may be a differential gearbox in which the ring gear 38 and the planet carrier 34 are both allowed to rotate.

    [0082] It will be appreciated that the arrangement shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 is by way of example only, and various alternatives are within the scope of the present disclosure. Purely by way of example, any suitable arrangement may be used for locating the gearbox 30 in the engine 10 and/or for connecting the gearbox 30 to the engine 10. By way of further example, the connections (such as the linkages 36, 40 in the FIG. 2 example) between the gearbox 30 and other parts of the engine 10 (such as the input shaft 26, the output shaft and the fixed structure 24) may have any desired degree of stiffness or flexibility. By way of further example, any suitable arrangement of the bearings between rotating and stationary parts of the engine (for example between the input and output shafts from the gearbox and the fixed structures, such as the gearbox casing) may be used, and the disclosure is not limited to the exemplary arrangement of FIG. 2. For example, where the gearbox 30 has a star arrangement (described above), the skilled person would readily understand that the arrangement of output and support linkages and bearing locations would typically be different to that shown by way of example in FIG. 2.

    [0083] Accordingly, the present disclosure extends to a gas turbine engine having any arrangement of gearbox styles (for example star or planetary), support structures, input and output shaft arrangement, and bearing locations.

    [0084] Optionally, the gearbox may drive additional and/or alternative components (e.g. the intermediate pressure compressor and/or a booster compressor).

    [0085] Other gas turbine engines to which the present disclosure may be applied may have alternative configurations. For example, such engines may have an alternative number of compressors and/or turbines and/or an alternative number of interconnecting shafts. By way of further example, the gas turbine engine shown in FIG. 1 has a split flow nozzle 18, 20 meaning that the flow through the bypass duct 22 has its own nozzle 18 that is separate to and radially outside the core exhaust nozzle 20. However, this is not limiting, and any aspect of the present disclosure may also apply to engines in which the flow through the bypass duct 22 and the flow through the core 11 are mixed, or combined, before (or upstream of) a single nozzle, which may be referred to as a mixed flow nozzle.

    [0086] One or both nozzles (whether mixed or split flow) may have a fixed or variable area. Whilst the described example relates to a turbofan engine, the disclosure may apply, for example, to any type of gas turbine engine, such as an open rotor (in which the fan stage is not surrounded by a nacelle) or turboprop engine, for example. In some arrangements, the gas turbine engine 10 may not comprise a gearbox 30.

    [0087] The geometry of the gas turbine engine 10, and components thereof, is defined by a conventional axis system, comprising an axial direction (which is aligned with the rotational axis 9), a radial direction (in the bottom-to-top direction in FIG. 1), and a circumferential direction (perpendicular to the page in the FIG. 1 view). The axial, radial and circumferential directions are mutually perpendicular.

    [0088] In addition, the present invention is equally applicable to aero gas turbine engines, marine gas turbine engines and land-based gas turbine engines.

    [0089] FIG. 4A is a simplified schematic view of a fan and turbine arrangement 400A of a gas turbine engine, for example, the gas turbine engine 10 of FIG. 1. The fan and turbine arrangement 400A includes a fan 402 and a low pressure turbine stage 406. The low pressure turbine stage 406 may be one of a plurality of turbine stages of the gas turbine engine 10. For example, the gas turbine engine may also include a high pressure turbine stage, and perhaps also an intermediate pressure turbine stage, upstream of the low pressure turbine stage 406. The fan 402 is drivably coupled to the low pressure turbine stage 406 by a shaft 404.

    [0090] The fan and turbine arrangement 400A may be considered to be two lumped masses or inertias (i.e., the fan 402 and the low pressure turbine stage 406) with a torsional spring (i.e., the shaft 404) provided therebetween. Momentum exchanged when an object strikes the fan 402 may cause torsional oscillations of the shaft 404. Torsional oscillations of the shaft 404 may result in an abnormal difference between a speed of rotation N1 (shown in FIG. 5) of the fan 402 and a speed of rotation N1T (shown in FIG. 5) of the low pressure turbine stage 406. In accordance with this disclosure, comparison between the speed of rotation N1 of the fan 402 and the speed of rotation N1T of the low pressure turbine stage 406 may be used in detecting and possibly characterizing an event, for example a bird strike or another foreign or domestic object damage event.

    [0091] FIG. 4B is a simplified schematic view of another fan and turbine arrangement 400B. The fan and turbine arrangement 400B is similar to the fan and turbine arrangement 400A of FIG. 4A. However, as shown in FIG. 4B, the shaft 404 drivably couples the fan 402 to the low pressure turbine stage 406 via a gearbox 408. Like the fan and turbine arrangement 400A of FIG. 4A, the fan and turbine arrangement 400B can be considered a lumped mass or inertia system with a torsional spring (i.e., the shaft 404 and gearbox 408) provided therebetween, though the gearbox may change the response of the shaft 404 to an event as compared to the arrangement 400A of FIG. 4A.

    [0092] FIG. 5 illustrates a system 500 for detecting damage to a gas turbine engine, for example, the gas turbine engine 10 of FIG. 1. The system 500 includes a controller 502 for implementing a detection algorithm. The controller 502 may, for example, include a computer readable storage medium 504 (e.g., a memory) storing instructions or code which, when executed by a processor of the controller, causes the controller to perform the detection algorithm. In this example the controller 502 includes an electronic circuit for implementing the detection algorithm. The controller 502 may be part of a control unit associated with an aircraft that includes the gas turbine engine 10.

    [0093] The algorithm detects an impact event based on sensor inputs indicative of the speeds N1, N1T of the fan 402 and low pressure turbine stage 406 of the fan and turbine arrangement 400A, 400B shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B. The controller 502 receives a first signal S1 indicative of the speed of rotation N1 of the fan 402. The controller 502 further receives a second signal S2 indicative of the speed of rotation N1T of the low pressure turbine stage 406. The controller 502 further determines, based on the first signal S1 and the second signal S2, a difference metric ΔN representative of a difference between the speed of rotation N1 of the fan 402 and the speed of rotation N1T of the low pressure turbine stage 406.

    [0094] The first and second signals S1, S2 may be generated by pre-existing sensors present in the gas turbine engine 10. Such sensors may already be present in the engine 10 because they are already used, for example, to evaluate operating parameters of the gas turbine engine 10. The system 500 may not, therefore, require the installation of any additional sensors/circuits for generating the first and second signals S1, S2. The controller 502 may receive the first and second signals S1, S2 by wired connections, wireless connections, or combinations thereof. The sensors may directly measure the speeds N1, N1T of the fan and turbine or the speeds may be indirectly measured, for example derived from other measured variables.

    [0095] In this example the controller 502 includes a subtractor 510 that receives the first signal S1 and the second signal S2 and determines the difference metric ΔN by determining a difference between the fan speed signal N1 from the low pressure turbine speed N1T. Therefore, ΔN=|N1T−N1|. In some examples, the controller 502 may perform one or more signal filtering operations (e.g., time integration) on the first and second signals S1, S2 before determining the difference metric ΔN.

    [0096] The controller 502 further determines whether the difference metric ΔN passes a threshold TH. The controller 502 includes a comparator 512 that receives the difference metric ΔN from the subtractor 510. The comparator 512 compares the difference metric ΔN with the threshold TH. If the difference metric ΔN exceeds the TH (i.e., ΔN>TH), the controller 502 may determine that a damage event has occurred. If the difference metric ΔN does not pass the threshold TH (i.e., ΔN<TH), the controller 502 may further determine whether a non-damage event (the ingestion of ice, for example) has occurred based on whether the difference metric ΔN passes a second threshold (not shown in FIG. 5).

    [0097] In some examples, the threshold TH is a predetermined threshold for a gas turbine engine type (e.g., a class/model of engine) corresponding to the gas turbine engine 10. The threshold TH may be adapted (from a baseline value, for example) based on one or more current operating conditions of the gas turbine engine 10. The current operating conditions may include cruise conditions, high thrust conditions, idling conditions, etc. The threshold TH may also be adapted based on an engine history of the gas turbine engine 10. The engine history may include a time duration of operation, prior shutdown/starting times, maintenance history, etc. which may affect the response of the lumped masses and shaft to a momentum exchange.

    [0098] If the controller 502 determines that a damage event has occurred, the controller 502 may further determine an approximate impact energy associated with the damage event based on a magnitude of the difference metric ΔN. In some examples, the controller 502 may approximate a size of an impact object associated with damage event based on the approximate impact energy.

    [0099] The controller 502 may further categorise the damage event as one of a plurality of different possible types of damage event. The different types of damage event may include one or more foreign object damage events and/or one or more domestic object damage events. The one or more foreign object damage events may include a bird strike or another foreign object damage event. The one or more domestic object damage events may include the loss of a fan blade, a compressor blade or a turbine blade, for example.

    [0100] Particular events, for example a bird strike, may be associated with a particular range of impact energies and size. Therefore, in some examples the categorisation may be based on the determined approximate impact energy and/or the determined approximate size of the object. The controller 502 may categorise the damage event as one of the plurality of different possible types of damage event based on a comparison of the difference metric ΔN (and/or impact energy) and a plurality of different thresholds corresponding to the different types of damage event. For example, if the difference metric ΔN crosses a first threshold but is less than a second threshold, the damage event may be categorised as a domestic object damage event such as the loss of a turbine blade. However, if the difference metric ΔN crosses both the first and second thresholds, the damage event may be categorised as a bird strike.

    [0101] In some examples, the controller 502 may categorise the damage event as one of the plurality of possible types of damage events based on a degree to which the difference metric ΔN passes the threshold TH. For example, the controller 502 may categorise the damage event as a domestic object damage event if the difference metric ΔN is less than twice the threshold TH (i.e., ΔN<2TH). The controller 502 may categorise the damage event as a bird strike event if the difference metric ΔN is greater than or equal to twice the threshold TH (i.e., ΔN≥2TH).

    [0102] As shown in FIG. 5, the comparator 512 generates an output signal 514. The output signal 514 may be indicative of whether a damage event has occurred. If a damage has occurred, the output signal 514 may further be indicative of the type of damage event. The output signal 514 may also include additional information, such as the approximate impact energy associated with the damage event, the size of the impact object associated with the damage event, the location of the impact associated with the damage event, etc.

    [0103] In some examples, the output signal 514 may be indicative of a non-damage event if the difference metric ΔN does not passes the threshold TH. The controller 502 may further categorise the non-damage event as one of a plurality of types of non-damage event. Example of different types of non-damage event include ice accretion, ice shedding, hail, fan rotating stall, fan locked-in stall, fan flutter, fan forcing, rubbing between fan blades and a fan track liner, and engine vibrations not due to fan damage. The non-damage event may be categorised based on the magnitude of ΔN, for example based on a comparison of ΔN to a plurality of thresholds, an approximate impact energy inferred from ΔN, an impact location or any suitable combination as disclosed elsewhere herein.

    [0104] In some examples the output signal 514 may be further processed. The output signal 514 may be processed so that a result of the determination is displayed on a display unit in a cockpit of the aircraft. Information related to a damage event or a non-damage event may be displayed to a flight crew via the display unit. An alert may also be generated based on the output signal 514. The alert may be a visual alert, an audio alert, a haptic alert, or combinations thereof. The output signal 514 may also be recorded for future access. For example, a ground crew may access the information related to the damage event or the non-damage event.

    [0105] The system 500 of FIG. 5 may be robust to spurious detection during engine manoeuvres, such as slam acceleration and deceleration. The system 500 may therefore be less likely to provide false detections of damage events during normal engine operation. Thus, the output signal 514 of the system 500 may not require further processing, for example by the application of corrections using look-up tables. In this way fault, implementation of fault detection according to the present disclosure may be less complex compared to existing techniques.

    [0106] FIG. 6 illustrates a system 600 for detecting damage to a gas turbine engine, for example, the gas turbine engine 10. The system 600 is similar to the system 500 of FIG. 5 and includes a controller 602. The controller 602 receives the first signal S1 indicative of the speed of rotation N1 of the fan 402 (shown in FIG. 4A). The controller 602 further receives the second signal S2 indicative of the speed of rotation N1T of the low pressure turbine stage 406 (shown in FIG. 4A).

    [0107] Unlike the controller 502 of FIG. 5, the controller 602 includes a second comparator 634 in addition to the first comparator 632. Additionally, the controller 602 determines a difference metric ΔN based on a difference between time integrals of each of the first and second signals S1, S2. The integrals IS1, IS2 of the speed signals S1, S2 are related to the actual twist or torsion angles of the shaft 404 at the fan 402 and the lower pressure turbine stage, and a difference metric ΔN based on the time integrals may improve the robustness of the detection.

    [0108] In this example, the controller 602 includes a first integrator 622 and a second integrator 624. The first integrator 622 time integrates the first signal S1 indicative of the speed of rotation N1 of the fan 402 to produce a first integrated signal IS1. The second integrator 624 time integrates the second signal S2 indicative of the speed of rotation N1T of the low pressure turbine stage 406 to produce a second integrated signal IS2. The subtractor 610 receives the first integrated signal IS1 and the second integrated signal IS2. The subtractor 610 then determines the difference between the first integrated signal IS1 and the second integrated signal IS2 to determine the difference metric ΔN (i.e., ΔN=|IS1−IS2|).

    [0109] In the example illustrated in FIG. 6, the signals S1 and S2 are integrated prior to determining the difference between the signals IS1 and IS1. However, in other examples a difference between the two signals S1, S2 may be determined first and the difference between the signals integrated to form the difference metric ΔN.

    [0110] The first comparator 632 receives the difference metric ΔN from the subtractor 610. The comparator 632 may then compare the difference metric ΔN with a first threshold TH1 for detecting a damage event. The controller 602 may determine that a damage event has occurred if the difference metric ΔN passes the first threshold TH1. The comparator 632 may then generate an output signal 640 indicating a damage event has occurred.

    [0111] The second comparator 634 may receive the difference metric ΔN from the comparator 610. The second comparator 634 may then compare the difference metric ΔN with a second threshold TH2 for detecting a non-damage event. In some cases, the controller 602 may determine that a non-damage event has occurred if the difference metric ΔN passes the second threshold TH2 but does not pass the first threshold TH1. The second comparator 634 may then generate an output signal 650 indicative of the non-damage event.

    [0112] In some examples, the output signal 640 from the first comparator 632 is combined with the output signal from the second comparator 634 to provide a combined output signal 660 of the controller 602. While FIG. 6 shows two comparators 632, 634 connected in parallel, it will be appreciated that they could be connected in series, or a single comparator could compare the difference metric ΔN to both of the thresholds TH1, TH2. The system 600 could also utilize any number of thresholds greater than two. The thresholds may correspond to different types of damage events and/or non-damage events.

    [0113] The system 600 further includes an impact location detector 662 for detecting a location of an impact associated with an event. The impact location detector 662 may be a conventional location detector known in the art. The controller 602 may receive a third signal S3 from the impact location detector 662. The controller 602 may further categorize the event as one of a plurality of different possible types of damage event or non-damage events based at least in part on the location of the impact. For example, having determined that a damage event has occurred because ΔN passes the threshold TH1, the damage event may be categorized as a bird strike if the impact location is the fan and the impact energy or the magnitude of ΔN is within a predefined range associated with bird strikes. In an example, the combined output signal 660 may include information about the type of damage event. While not shown, the system 500 described above with reference to FIG. 5 could also include an impact location detector.

    [0114] FIG. 7 is a graph 700 depicting a time variation of the difference metric ΔN during a bird strike test. Time is shown along the ordinate (X-axis) and a magnitude of the difference metric ΔN is shown along the abscissa (Y-axis). A threshold 702 is shown in the graph 700 dividing the abscissa into two regions, i.e., a damage region 704 above the threshold 702 and a non-damage region 706 below the threshold 702. The systems 500, 600 of FIGS. 5 and 6 may determine that a damage event, in this case a bird strike, has occurred at time T1 because of a spike in the difference metric ΔN that passes the threshold 702 and enters the damage region 704.

    [0115] The detection algorithm implemented by system 500 may be surprisingly robust against spurious detection associated with normal engine running manoeuvres. Specifically, unlike some techniques, the algorithm implemented by system 500 may not provide a false indication of a bird strike during normal engine operation. For example, in addition to the bird strike event at time T1, the test data shown in FIG. 7 includes several engine throttling events yet not of them results in a spike in ΔN that passes the threshold 702. Some existing detection techniques have been found not to be so robust and may require additional processing, filtering or even suspension to avoid false detections during normal operation.

    [0116] The threshold 702 may be a fixed threshold, determined from modelling or empirical testing, for this specific engine or an engine of its type. The threshold 702 may have been adapted based on one or more current operating conditions of the gas turbine engine 10 and/or the engine history of the gas turbine engine 10. The threshold 702 may also be adapted to adjust a sensitivity of the system 500 to damage events.

    [0117] FIG. 8 is a graph 800 depicting a time variation of the difference metric ΔN during an event that is known to correspond to ice accretion and shedding. Time is shown along the ordinate (X-axis) and a magnitude of the difference metric ΔN is shown along the abscissa (Y-axis). A threshold 802 is shown in the graph 800 dividing the abscissa into two regions, i.e., a damage region 804 above the threshold 802 and a non-damage region 806 below the threshold 802. The signal magnitude remains below the threshold 802, i.e., in the non-damage region 806 during ice accretion and shedding. The system 500 of FIG. 5 may therefore determine that no damage event has occurred during the time duration, with no false detection.

    [0118] FIG. 9 is a graph 900 depicting a time variation of the difference metric ΔN during damage and non-damage events. Time is shown along the ordinate (X-axis) and the magnitude of ΔN is shown along the abscissa (Y-axis). A first threshold 902, a second threshold 904 and a third threshold 906 are shown in the graph 900. The first threshold 902 corresponds to a first type of damage event (e.g., a bird strike), the second threshold 904 corresponds to a second type of damage event (e.g., a domestic object damage event), and the second threshold 904 corresponds to a non-damage event (e.g., ice accretion and shedding). The first, second and third thresholds 902, 904, 906 divide the abscissa into four regions, i.e., a first damage region 908 above the first threshold 902, a second damage region 910 between the first and second thresholds 902, 904, a first non-damage region 912 between the second and third thresholds 904, 906, and a second non-damage region 914 below the third threshold 906.

    [0119] The systems 500, 600 of FIGS. 5 and 6 may determine that a first type of damage event has occurred at time T2 when the signal magnitude passes the first threshold 902, i.e., crosses into the first damage region 908. The system 600 may further determine that a second type of damage event has occurred at time T3 when the signal magnitude passes the second threshold 904 but does not pass the first threshold 902. In other words, the signal magnitude lies between the first and second thresholds 902, 904. The system 600 may further determine that a first type of non-damage event has occurred at time T4 when the signal magnitude passes the third threshold 906 but does not pass the second threshold 904. In other words, the signal magnitude lies between the second and third thresholds 904, 906. Further, the system 600 may determine that the gas turbine engine 10 of FIG. 1 is operating normally when the signal magnitude does not pass the third threshold 906, i.e., lies in the second non-damage region 914.

    [0120] The systems 500, 600 can therefore classify different types of damaging and non-damaging events based on the signal magnitude and multiple threshold ranges or regions. The threshold ranges can be adjusted as per application requirements.

    [0121] FIG. 10 is a graph 1000 depicting a time variation of the difference metric ΔN during the non-damage event also shown in FIG. 8. Time is shown along the ordinate (X-axis) and a signal magnitude of the difference metric ΔN is shown along the abscissa (Y-axis). A threshold 1002 is shown in the graph 1000. FIG. 10 illustrates that the threshold 1002 can be adapted based on one or more current operating conditions of the gas turbine engine 10 and/or the engine history of the gas turbine engine 10. The threshold 1002 may correspond to cruise conditions of the aircraft including the gas turbine engine 10. In some examples, the threshold 1002 may be increased to a threshold 1002′ during high thrust conditions of the aircraft, for example, during take-off. In some examples, the threshold 1002 may be decreased to a threshold 1002″ during idling conditions of the aircraft. In some examples, the threshold 1002 may be progressively increased to the threshold 1002′ as a total operational time of the gas turbine engine 10 increases. In some examples, the threshold 1002 may be progressively decreased to the threshold 1002″ as a time period from a previous maintenance operation increases.

    [0122] FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing a computer-implemented method 1100 for detecting damage to a gas turbine engine, for example, the gas turbine engine 10. Reference will also be made to FIGS. 4A-B to 10. The method 1100 may be performed by the controller 502 of FIG. 5 or the controller 602 of FIG. 6.

    [0123] The gas turbine engine 10 includes a fan 402 and a low pressure turbine stage 406. The fan 402 is drivably coupled to the low pressure turbine stage 406 by the shaft 404, possibly via a gearbox 408.

    [0124] At 1102, the method 1100 includes receiving the first signal S1 indicative of the speed of rotation N1 of the fan 402. At 1104, the method 1100 further includes receiving the second signal S2 indicative of the speed of rotation N1T of the low pressure turbine stage 406. The speeds N1 and N1T may be directly measured or indirectly measured via measurement of another variable. The signals S1, S2 are indicative of the contemporaneous speeds N1, N1T of the fan and low pressure turbine. That is, the speeds N1, N1T of the fan and low pressure turbine are recorded at the same time. In some cases, the first and second signals S1, S2 may be buffered for calculation.

    [0125] At 1106, the method 1100 further includes determining, based on the first signal S1 and the second signal S2, a difference metric ΔN. The difference metric ΔN is representative of the difference between the speed of rotation N1 of the fan 402 and speed of rotation N1T of the low pressure turbine stage 406. The difference metric may be the difference |N1T−N1| between the two speeds or another metric that is a mathematical function of N1 and N1T that in some way represents the difference. In some examples the measured speeds N1T and N1 may be modified or normalized before their difference is taken, for example to take account of the effect of the gearbox 408 on the expected rotation speeds N1T, N1 during normal operation.

    [0126] In some examples, determining the difference metric ΔN includes time integrating the difference |N1T−N1| or time integrating the first signal S1 indicative of the speed of rotation N1 of the fan 402 to produce the first integrated signal IS1; time integrating the second signal S2 indicative of the speed of rotation N1T of the low pressure turbine stage 406 to produce the second integrated signal IS2; and determining the difference (|IS1−IS2|) between the first integrated signal IS1 and the second integrated signal IS2.

    [0127] At 1108, the method 1100 further includes determining whether a damage event has occurred based on whether the difference metric ΔN or ΔN passes the threshold TH or TH1, respectively.

    [0128] It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments above described and various modifications and improvements can be made without departing from the concepts described herein. Except where mutually exclusive, any of the features may be employed separately or in combination with any other features and the disclosure extends to and includes all combinations and sub-combinations of one or more features described herein.