THERMOPLASTIC MOULDED PART, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND DUCT INCORPORATING SAME

Abstract

The invention relates to a thermoplastic molded part able to constitute a duct of an aerial vehicle or space vehicle, to a method of manufacturing same, and to this duct which comprises said part. For example, provided is a part according to the invention, which has an external surface (2) with symmetry of revolution at least in part, is such that the external surface comprises a multitude of integrally molded depressions (6) which are connected to one another in pairs by crests (7), and that: each of the depressions has a largest transverse dimension D between the adjacently paired crests of between 3 mm and 10 mm, measured in a direction d perpendicular to the crests delimiting each depression, and each of the crests has an apex of transverse width L measured in said direction d, where L<D.

Claims

1. A molded thermoplastic-matrix part able to constitute a duct (1, 1′) equipping an aerial vehicle or space vehicle, the part having an external surface (2, 2′) with symmetry of revolution at least in part, wherein the external surface comprises a multitude of integrally molded depressions (6, 6′) connected in pairs to one another by crests (7, 7′), and wherein: each of the depressions has a largest transverse dimension D between the adjacently paired crests of between 3 mm and 10 mm, measured in a direction d perpendicular to the crests delimiting each depression, and each of the crests has an apex of transverse width L measured in said direction d, where L<D.

2. The part according to claim 1, wherein each of the depressions (6, 6′) has an essentially spherical or cylindrical concave surface.

3. The part according to claim 2, wherein L<0.5 D.

4. The part according to claim 3, wherein L<0.2 D.

5. The part according to claim 2, wherein the concave surface is defined by a radius of curvature R linked to said largest transverse dimension D by 0.5 D<R<2 D.

6. The part according to claim 5, wherein the concave surface is defined by said radius of curvature R linked to said largest transverse dimension D by 0.7 D<R<1.5 D.

7. The part according to claim 1, wherein the part has a difference in thickness, measured between each of the crests (7, 7′) and a bottom (6a) of the adjacent depressions (6, 6′), from the external surface (2, 2′) to a radially opposite internal surface (5, 5′) of the part, of between 0.2 mm and 2 mm.

8. The part according to claim 7, wherein the part has said difference in thickness of between 0.3 mm and 1.3 mm.

9. The part according to claim 1, wherein the depressions (6, 6′) are identical and regularly spaced so as to form at least one peripheral row of depressions between two open ends (3, 3′ and 4, 4′) of the part, the or each row extending over a periphery of the external surface (2, 2′) with a repetition pitch having a value equal to D+L between two consecutive depressions in the or each row.

10. The part according to claim 7 or 9, wherein said difference in thickness of the part is between: 0.8 mm and 1.3 mm when said pitch between depressions (6, 6′) is between 6 mm and 8 mm, or 0.3 mm and 0.7 mm when said pitch between depressions (6, 6′) is between 3 mm and 5 mm.

11. The part according to claim 10, wherein said difference in thickness of the part is between: 0.8 mm and 1.3 mm when said pitch between depressions (6, 6′) is between 6 mm and 8 mm, where 0.7 D<R<D, or 0.3 mm and 0.7 mm when said pitch between depressions (6, 6′) is between 3 mm and 5 mm, where D<R<1.3 D.

12. The part according to claim 9, wherein the depressions (6, 6′) form a plurality of said peripheral rows spaced over the external surface (2, 2′), the depressions of each row each having an essentially spherical concave surface and being formed discontinuously on the external surface in the manner of golf ball dimples.

13. The part according to claim 9, wherein the depressions (6, 6′) form a peripheral row on the external surface (2, 2′), the depressions of said row each having a continuous essentially semicylindrical concave surface on the external surface.

14. The part according to claim 1, wherein the part is injection-molded and has two open ends (3, 3′ and 4, 4′) which each have, independently of one another, an essentially circular, elliptical or polygonal end periphery.

15. The part according to claim 1, wherein the part is constituted by a polymeric composition based on at least one thermoplastic polymer chosen from among polyamides (PA), poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS), polyether imides (PEI), polyphthalamides (PPA), polyphenylsulfones (PPSU), polyether ether ketones (PEEK), polyaryl ether ketones (PAEK) and polyvinylidene fluorides (PVDF).

16. The part according to claim 15, wherein the composition comprises a reinforcement comprising: a reinforcing filler dispersed in the composition chosen from among organic fillers including carbon blacks and carbon nanotubes, and inorganic fillers, and/or reinforcing fibers chosen from among glass fibers and carbon fibers, forming a unidirectional or woven reinforcement.

17. The part according to claim 16, wherein the reinforcement comprises discontinuous glass fibers in a mass fraction of between 20 and 40%.

18. A method for manufacturing a part according to claim 1, wherein there is implemented a step of injection-molding, in a mold configured to negatively form said depressions (6, 6′) and said crests (7, 7′), of a polymeric composition comprising said thermoplastic matrix and possibly a reinforcement comprising a reinforcing filler dispersed in the composition and/or reinforcing fibers.

19. A duct (1, 1′) for an aerial vehicle or space vehicle, the duct being configured to be mounted within the vehicle while conveying a liquid or gaseous fluid therein, wherein the duct comprises or is constituted by a part according to claim 1 that is able to resist cracking of the part due to impacts of tools during installation or maintenance operations in the vicinity of the duct.

20. The duct (1, 1′) according to claim 19, wherein the duct forms an air intake for an air-conditioning unit of the vehicle so as to supply conditioned air to at least one cabin or passenger compartment of the vehicle, the duct comprising: a first open end (3, 3′) of an essentially circular or elliptical periphery that is configured to be connected in a leaktight manner to a line of the air-conditioning unit opening inside the cabin or passenger compartment, and a second open end (4, 4′) which has a widened cross section with respect to that of the first end, which is configured to be connected to an air-air heat exchanger of the vehicle.

21. The duct (1, 1′) according to claim 20, wherein said second open end (4, 4′) has an essentially polygonal or oblong periphery which is configured to be connected to an air-air heat exchanger of the vehicle external to the cabin or passenger compartment.

22. The duct (1, 1′) according to claim 20, wherein the duct has a passage cross section that increases from the first end (3, 3′) to the second end (4, 4′), the duct being provided with means of connection to said air-conditioning unit.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0048] Other features, advantages and details of the present invention will become apparent from reading the following description of several exemplary embodiments of the invention given by way of illustration and in a non-limiting manner in relation to the appended drawings, in which:

[0049] FIG. 1 is a lateral perspective view of a part according to one example of the invention forming an air duct of the air inlet diffuser type for an aircraft, the arrangement of the depressions and crests not being visible.

[0050] FIG. 2 is a perspective lateral view of a part according to another example of the invention forming another air duct for an aircraft of the scoop type, the arrangement of the depressions and crests not being visible either.

[0051] FIG. 3 is a partial schematic view in section in the plane III-III of FIG. 1 showing an example of an arrangement of a depression and of two adjacent crests of an external surface, an example common to the two embodiments of the invention with discontinuous and continuous depressions.

[0052] FIG. 4 is a partial schematic view in cross section showing more completely the example of the transverse arrangement of FIG. 3 for the two embodiments of the invention, and additionally showing an example of the longitudinal arrangement of the depressions and crests in the plane IV-IV of FIG. 1 for the first embodiment of the invention with discontinuous depressions.

[0053] FIG. 5 is a complete schematic view in cross section of a part according to an example of the invention in the plane V-V of FIG. 2 or the plane III-III of FIG. 1, showing an example of the arrangement of the depressions and crests that is common to the two embodiments of the invention over a circumferential periphery of the part.

[0054] FIG. 6 is a photograph showing in a perspective top view a device for evaluating the impact behavior used for testing parts and “control” specimens and according to the two embodiments of the invention, comprising an impactor with variation of the impact energy.

[0055] FIG. 7 is a photograph showing in a perspective top view an exemplary embodiment of an arrangement according to the first embodiment of the invention with discontinuous depressions and crests.

[0056] FIG. 8 is a photograph showing in a top view the external surface of a first specimen A2 formed by a molded sheet whose external surface is provided with a tight arrangement of continuous depressions and crests according to the second embodiment of the invention, this specimen being constituted by a material according to the invention and having been impacted on two occasions by the device of FIG. 6 with an impact energy of 3.5 J.

[0057] FIG. 9 is a photograph detailing in perspective the continuous depressions and crests of the first specimen A2 of FIG. 8.

[0058] FIG. 10 is a photograph showing in a top view the external surface of a second specimen B7 formed by a molded sheet whose external surface is provided with another, more spaced arrangement of continuous depressions and crests according to the second embodiment of the invention, this specimen being constituted by a material according to the invention and having been impacted on two occasions by the device of FIG. 6 with an impact energy of 3.8 J.

[0059] FIG. 11 is a photograph detailing in perspective the continuous depressions and crests of the second specimen B7 of FIG. 10.

[0060] FIG. 12 contains three photographs showing in a top view the external surfaces of three “control” specimens C4, C5, C6 formed by 2 mm-thick molded sheets whose external surface is planar and which are constituted by the same material according to the invention, with those on the left and in the centre impacted on two occasions with an impact energy of 2 J, and that on the right on one occasion with an impact energy of 2 J.

[0061] FIG. 13 contains two photographs showing in a top view the external surfaces of two “control” specimens D2, D4 formed by 3 mm-thick molded sheets whose external surface is planar and which are constituted by the same material according to the invention, with those on the left and right impacted on two occasions with an impact energy of 2 J and 2.5 J, respectively.

[0062] FIG. 14 contains two photographs showing in a top view the external surfaces of two “control” specimens E3, E4 formed by 4 mm-thick molded sheets whose external surface is planar and which are constituted by the same material according to the invention, with those on the left and right impacted on two occasions with an impact energy of 3.5 J and 4 J, respectively.

[0063] FIG. 15 contains three photographs showing in a top view the external surfaces of three “control” specimens F3, F4, F5 formed by 5 mm-thick molded sheets whose external surface is planar and which are constituted by the same material according to the invention, with those on the left, in the center and on the right impacted with an impact energy of 8 J, 7 J and 7.5 J, respectively.

[0064] The duct 1 according to the example of the invention illustrated in FIG. 1, preferably molded by injection-molding and constituted by a thermoplastic composition or thermoplastic-matrix composite such as that defined above, is in particular configured to form an air intake to be connected to a circuit of an air-conditioning unit equipping an aircraft in order to condition its cabin when the aircraft is in flight and on the ground (i.e. permanently, as long as the cabin of the aircraft is occupied). The duct 1 has an external surface 2 comprising, in this example: [0065] an open lower end 3 of circular periphery provided with a tightness seal 3a so that it can be connected to a line or pipe of the air-conditioning unit opening inside the cabin (not visible), and [0066] an open upper end 4 of essentially rectangular periphery with rounded corners that is configured to be connected in a leaktight manner into an air-air heat exchanger of the vehicle (typically with exchange between the hot air emanating from the engine compartment(s) and the cold outside air), this exchanger being, for example, located in each wing of the aircraft.

[0067] The lower end 3 is extended by a lower portion of the external surface 2 with symmetry of revolution, of essentially curved cylindrical shape, which is extended progressively and continuously by an upper portion essentially in the form of a truncated pyramid with a rectangular base terminating in the upper end 4.

[0068] The duct 1′ according to the example of the invention illustrated in FIG. 2, such as an air inlet diffuser of the scoop duct type, is essentially distinguished from the aforementioned duct 1 of FIG. 1 in that its external surface 2′ comprises, on the opposite side from its lower end 3′ to be connected to the line or pipe of the air-conditioning unit (similar to the end 3 of FIG. 1), an open upper end 4′ to be connected to the air-air heat exchanger of the aircraft, which has an essentially oblong periphery and which is provided with a planar rim having a width greater than that of the rim of the upper end 4. The lower end 3′ is also extended by an essentially curved cylindrical lower portion, which is progressively extended by a flared upper portion (of essentially truncated pyramid or substantially frustoconical shape) terminating in the upper end 4′.

[0069] The internal surface 5, 5′ of the duct 1, 1′ can have a smooth geometry, by contrast with the external surface 2, 2′ which, according to the invention, comprises a multitude of integrally molded depressions 6, 6′ which are connected to one another in pairs by crests 7, 7′ (visible in FIGS. 3-6 and 8-11), where: [0070] each depression 6, 6′ has a largest transverse dimension D between the adjacently paired crests 7, 7′ of between 3 mm and 10 mm, measured in a direction d perpendicular to the crests 7, 7′ delimiting each depression 6, 6′, and [0071] each crest 7, 7′ has an apex of transverse width L measured in said direction d, where L<D.

[0072] In the examples of FIGS. 3, 4 and 5 common to the first embodiment of the invention with discontinuous depressions (i.e. formed by essentially spherical sectors) and to the second embodiment of the invention with continuous depressions (i.e. formed by cylindrical sectors of parallel axes), it can be seen that each depression 6, 6′ can have the same substantially hemispherical or semicylindrical concave surface with a bottom 6a and a radius R, where, for example, 0.5 D<R<2 D, preferably 0.7 D<R<1.5 D. Each depression 6, 6′ extends with the dimension D from one salient edge 8 of one crest 7, 7′ to another, adjacent salient edge 8 of at least one other crest 7, 7′ delimiting the depression 6, 6′, with it being specified that, in the schematic example of FIG. 5, the crests 7, 7′ each have a smaller width D than the width D of each crest 7, 7′ of FIGS. 3 and 4 (in other words, the crests 7, 7′ of FIG. 5 are less flattened, i.e. more pointed than those of FIGS. 3 and 4).

[0073] In the first embodiment of the invention of FIG. 7, it can be seen that the depressions 6, 6′ of the duct 1, 1′ each have a virtually hemispherical concave surface and that the crests 7, 7′, which are relatively pointed (i.e. not very flattened), have an apex curved downwards between two adjacent crests 7, 7′, with the respective bottoms 6a of the depressions 6, 6′ which define the radially innermost points of the duct 1, 1′ and the junctions between crests 7, 7′ (in the example of FIG. 7, between four crests 7, 7′ which are perpendicular in pairs) which define the radially outermost points of the duct 1, 1′, with a maximum difference in thickness for the duct 1, 1′ of, for example, between 0.2 mm and 2 mm. It can be seen that these depressions 6, 6′ are thus arranged in a multitude of rows formed in a spaced manner on the external surface 2, 2′ in the manner of golf ball dimples.

[0074] In the second embodiment of the invention illustrated in the photographs of FIGS. 8-11 and in the detail in FIGS. 3-5, it can be seen that the depressions 6, 6′ of the duct 1, 1′ each have an essentially semicylindrical concave surface (the longitudinal axes of symmetry formed by the generatrices of the semicylinders being parallel to one another) and that the crests 7, 7′, which are substantially flat and also parallel to one another, each have an apex curved downwards between two adjacent crests 7, 7′, with the bottoms 6a of the depressions 6, 6′ which define the radially innermost points of the duct 1, 1′ and the junctions between two consecutive crests 7, 7′ (see FIGS. 8-11) which define the radially outermost points of the duct 1, 1′, with a maximum difference in thickness for the duct 1, 1′ of, for example, between 0.3 mm and 1.3 mm.

Tests on Specimens Having an External Surface According to the Invention

Specimens Tested

[0075] First molded parallelepipedal specimens were prepared by injection-molding one and the same thermoplastic-matrix polymeric composition such that first textured specimens obtained each had one of their two major surfaces which was textured according to FIG. 7 in accordance with the first embodiment of the invention (on account of the negative specific cavity of a first injection mold), and such that other first “control” specimens had each of their two major surfaces smooth.

[0076] Each first smooth specimen had dimensions of 950 mm×950 mm×7 mm and a mass of 46.6 g. Each first textured specimen had macro-cells of the type resembling those of a golf ball, a mass of 48.4 g and major surfaces of dimensions 950 mm×950 mm with a thickness defined by an average mesh of 7 mm of the macro-cells.

[0077] Second molded parallelepipedal specimens A, B, C, D, E, F were prepared by injection-molding one and the same composition with a PEEK thermoplastic matrix reinforced by 30% by mass of glass fibers (material bearing the tradename Victrex® 150GL30), the specimens A and B having one of their two major surfaces which was in accordance with the second embodiment of the invention of FIGS. 8-11 (on account of the negative specific cavity of a second injection mold), and the specimens C, D, E, F being “control” specimens having smooth major faces according to FIGS. 12-15. These second specimens A to F each had major surfaces of dimensions 120 mm×80 mm.

[0078] The injection-molding of all the specimens involved using molds of the plunger and die type, using a maximum pressure in the cavity of each mold of approximately 1500 bar, and a temperature in each mold of between 180 and 200° C.

[0079] More precisely, six identical specimens A1 to A6 each had a major textured surface according to FIGS. 8-9 with a reduced period (i.e. a high frequency) for the repetition of its semicylindrical depressions with longitudinal axes of symmetry parallel to one another, each specimen A1-A6 having the characteristics detailed in Table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Minimum thickness (mm) 2.5 Thickness at the apex (mm) 2.9 Mass (g) 38.9 Spacing between opposite bearing points of each specimen (mm) 100 Radius of each depression (mm) 5 Repetition pitch of the depressions (mm) 4.36

[0080] Nine identical specimens B1 to B9 each had a major textured surface according to FIGS. 10-11 with a higher period (i.e. smaller frequency) than that of FIGS. 8-9 for the repetition of its semicylindrical depressions with longitudinal axes of symmetry parallel to one another, each specimen B1-B9 having the characteristics detailed in Table 2 below.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Minimum thickness (mm) 2.5 Thickness at the apex (mm) 3.6 Mass (g) 41.7 Spacing between opposite bearing points of each specimen (mm) 100 Radius of each depression (mm) 5 Repetition pitch of the depressions (mm) 6.95

[0081] Six identical “control” specimens C1-C6 with the two smooth major surfaces each had the characteristics detailed in Table 3 below.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Thickness (mm) 2 Mass (g) 29.7 Spacing between opposite bearing points of each specimen (mm) 100

[0082] Six identical “control” specimens D1-D6 with the two smooth major surfaces each had the characteristics detailed in Table 4 below.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Thickness (mm) 3 Mass (g) 44.25 Spacing between opposite bearing points of each specimen (mm) 100

[0083] Five identical “control” specimens E1-E5 with the two smooth major surfaces each had the characteristics detailed in Table 5 below.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Thickness (mm) 4 Mass (g) 56.75 Spacing between opposite bearing points of each specimen (mm) 100

[0084] Five identical “control” specimens F1-F5 with the two smooth major surfaces each had the characteristics detailed in Table 6 below.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Thickness (mm) 5 Mass (g) 73 Spacing between opposite bearing points of each specimen (mm) 100

Implementation of the Impact Tests on These Specimens and Results

[0085] Use was made of the drop weight tower illustrated in FIG. 6, beneath which there can be seen a duct according to the invention of the type illustrated in FIG. 1 intended to be subjected to these impact tests. A spherical impactor with a diameter equal to 16 mm (the radius of the impactor being greater than the radius of each semicylindrical depression for the specimens A and B) was used by varying the impact energy according to the well-known law of mechanics E=m.Math.g.Math.z (where m is the mass, g is the acceleration due to gravity and z is the drop height). There was chosen a constant drop height z of 1 m to release masses m of increasing value on the aforementioned specimens, the latter being placed (either flat or bearing on two spaced-apart supports for bending impacts) beneath the drop weight tower, the objective in the impact tests being to determine the limit impact energy value beyond which each specimen reveals visible damage such as a crack or breakage of each specimen.

First Specimens According to FIG. 7:

[0086] The impact tests carried out on the first specimens having a textured major face according to the first embodiment of the invention showed an improved limit impact energy before visible damage as compared with that of the first smooth specimens of the same thickness, demonstrating an improved impact resistance in relation to the latter.

Second Specimens A1-A6 According to FIGS. 8-9:

[0087] Table 7 below details the results of the tests carried out for each specimen A1 to A6, in terms of impact energy, of status of the specimen (good or poor state) after a first impact and possibly after a second impact for a given impact energy, and of identification of the visible damage after each impact (comments concerning the impacted textured outer side of each specimen, provided that it is not broken subsequent to each impact).

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Impact Status of Comment on Status of Comment on Specimen energy (J) impact No 1 impact No 1 impact No 2 impact No 2 A1 3.0 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side A2 3.5 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side A3 4.0 Poor Complete breakage — — A4 3.7 Poor Complete breakage — — A5 3.6 Poor Complete breakage — — A6 3.5 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side

[0088] Table 7 shows that the limit impact energy before rupture for the specimens A1-A6 was 3.5 J.

Second Specimens B1-B9 According to FIGS. 10-11:

[0089] Table 8 below details the results of the tests carried out for each specimen B1 to B9, in terms of impact energy, of status of the specimen (good or poor state) after a first impact and possibly after a second impact for a given impact energy, and of identification of the visible damage after each impact (comments concerning the impacted textured outer side of each specimen, provided that it is not broken subsequent to each impact).

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Impact Status of Comment on Status of Comment on Specimen energy (J) impact No 1 impact No 1 impact No 2 impact No 2 B1 3.0 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side sensitive to the touch B2 3.2 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side B3 3.5 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side B4 3.6 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side sensitive to the touch B5 4.0 Poor Complete breakage — — B6 3.7 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side B7 3.8 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side B8 3.9 Poor Complete breakage — — B9 3.8 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side

[0090] Table 8 shows that the limit impact energy before rupture for the specimens B1-B9 was 3.8 J.

“Control” Specimens C1-C6 According to FIG. 12:

[0091] Table 9 below details the results of the tests carried out for each specimen C1 to C6, in terms of impact energy, of status of the specimen (good or poor state) after a first impact and possibly after a second impact for a given impact energy, and of identification of the visible damage after each impact (comments concerning the impacted textured outer side of each specimen, provided that it is not broken subsequent to each impact).

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Impact Status of Comment on Status of Comment on Specimen energy (J) impact No 1 impact No 1 impact No 2 impact No 2 C1 3.5 Poor Complete breakage — — C2 3.0 Poor Complete breakage — — C3 2.5 Poor Partial breakage — — C4 2.0 Good No mark Poor Complete breakage C5 2.0 Good Mark on outer side Poor Partial breakage C6 2.0 Poor Partial breakage — —

[0092] Table 9 shows that the limit impact energy before rupture for the specimens C1-C6 was less than 2.0 J.

“Control” Specimens D1-D6 According to FIG. 13:

[0093] Table 10 below details the results of the tests carried out for each specimen D1 to D6, in terms of impact energy, of status of the specimen (good or poor state) after a first impact and possibly after a second impact for a given impact energy, and of identification of the visible damage after each impact (comments concerning the impacted textured outer side of each specimen, provided that it is not broken subsequent to each impact).

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Impact Status of Comment on Status of Comment on Specimen energy (J) impact No 1 impact No 1 impact No 2 impact No 2 D1 2.0 Poor Interior crack — — D2 2.0 Good Mark on outer side Poor Interior crack D3 2.0 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side D4 2.5 Good Mark on outer side Poor Complete breakage D5 2.5 Poor Complete breakage — — D6 2.5 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side

[0094] Table 10 shows that the limit impact energy before rupture for the specimens D1-D6 was 2.0 J.

“Control” Specimens E1-E5 According to FIG. 14:

[0095] Table 11 below details the results of the tests carried out for each specimen E1 to E5, in terms of impact energy, of status of the specimen (good or poor state) after a first impact and possibly after a second impact for a given impact energy, and of identification of the visible damage after each impact (comments concerning the impacted textured outer side of each specimen, provided that it is not broken subsequent to each impact).

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Impact Status of Comment on Status of Comment on Specimen energy (J) impact No 1 impact No 1 impact No 2 impact No 2 E1 2.5 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side E2 3.0 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side E3 3.5 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side E4 4.0 Good Mark on outer side Poor Complete breakage E5 4.0 Poor Complete breakage — —

[0096] Table 11 shows that the limit impact energy before rupture for the specimens E1-E5 was between 3.5 and 4.0 J.

“Control” Specimens F1-F5 According to FIG. 15:

[0097] Table 12 below details the results of the tests carried out for each specimen F1 to F5, in terms of impact energy, of status of the specimen (good or poor state) after a first impact and possibly after a second impact for a given impact energy, and of identification of the visible damage after each impact (comments concerning the impacted textured outer side of each specimen, provided that it is not broken subsequent to each impact).

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Impact Status of Comment on Status of Comment on Specimen energy (J) impact No 1 impact No 1 impact No 2 impact No 2 F1 5.0 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side F2 6.0 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side F3 8.0 Poor Complete breakage — — F4 7.0 Good Mark on outer side Good Mark on outer side F5 7.5 Poor Complete breakage — —

[0098] Table 12 shows that the limit impact energy before rupture for the specimens F1-F5 was between 7.0 and 7.5 J.

[0099] These tests show that the textured surfaces according to FIGS. 7-11 make it possible, for parts according to the invention, to delay the appearance of a crack subsequent to impacts received, by virtue of the crushing of the relief formed by the crests and the depressions during the damping of these impacts by comparison with smooth parts of equivalent thickness, and of initiating early warning monitoring of the textured part according to the invention.

[0100] In particular, Tables 7 and 8 show that the textured surfaces according to the second embodiment of the invention provide the specimens A and B incorporating them with a markedly increased limit impact energy before rupture, and hence a significantly improved impact resistance, by comparison with the specimens C and D of equivalent thicknesses ranging from 2 mm to 3 mm (see Tables 9 and 10).

[0101] Table 11 shows that the thickness of the “control” specimens (see specimen E) needs to be increased to 4 mm in order to obtain an equivalent limit impact energy before rupture (of between 3.5 and 4.0 J), that is to say a mass gain of approximately 25% for the parts A and B according to the two embodiments of the invention.

[0102] These results also show an increase in the limit impact energy before rupture with the thickness of the specimens (see Tables 7-8 for specimens A and B, and Tables 9-12 for specimens C-F).

[0103] The results of Tables 7-8 for the second embodiment of the textured surface according to the invention additionally show that the spacing of the crests and depressions with a high repetition period (i.e. a reduced frequency or repetition pitch affording a more spaced-apart arrangement of the crests/depressions) constitutes a preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention, given that the limit impact energy before rupture is 3.8 J for FIGS. 10-11 versus 3.5 J for FIGS. 8-9.

[0104] This preferred example of the invention of FIGS. 10-11 is manifested in particular by a higher “drop” (i.e. difference in thickness between the crests and the bottoms of the depressions) and by an increased thickness of the part by comparison with the variant of the invention of FIGS. 8 and 9.