COFFEE CONTAINER FOR BEVERAGE PREPARATION AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A COFFEE CONTAINER

Abstract

The invention relates to a method of manufacturing a coffee container (1a-1g) for preparing a coffee beverage upon injection of liquid into the container, the method comprising the steps of: —selecting and providing container wall means (2, 2a, 3a-3g) for enclosing a predefined container, —compacting an amount of bulk coffee material such as roast and ground coffee particles to a coffee tablet under predefined compaction force in the container volume between the container wall means (2, 2a, 3a-3g), —wherein the applied compaction force is set based on at least the provided container volume and/or on a particular type of beverage to be prepared from the provided container, and wherein the applied compaction force is set to a value between 0.5 to 15 kN, preferably between 1 kN and 10 kN.

Claims

1. A method of manufacturing a coffee container for preparing a coffee beverage upon injection of liquid into the container, the method comprising the steps of: selecting and providing container wall member for enclosing a predefined container volume, compacting an amount of bulk coffee material to a coffee tablet under predefined compaction force in the container volume between the container wall member, wherein the applied compaction force is set based on at least the provided container volume and/or on a particular type of beverage to be prepared from the provided container, and wherein the applied compaction force is set to a value between 0.5 to 15 kN.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the applied compaction force is set based also on the granulometry of the provided bulk coffee material and/or on the roasting value of the bulk coffee material.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein a granulometry of the bulk coffee material lies between 150 to 600 μm and/or wherein the roasting value of the bulk coffee material lies between 50 and 120 CTN.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the applied compaction force is set lower for a small particle size and set higher for a larger particle size of the bulk coffee material.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the step of sealingly connecting a first and second enclosing sheet constituting the container wall member about a circumference of the enclosed amount of coffee material under formation of a circumferential flange-like rim portion of the container.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the different selectable container wall member is designed for forming alternative types of containers.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the container type for preparing a short coffee beverage has a volume of between 5 ml and 15 ml.

8. The method according to claim 6, wherein the compaction force for a container type designed for preparing a short coffee beverage is set to a value between 0.5 kN and 5 kN, for a container type designed for preparing a long coffee beverage is set to a value between 0.5 kN and 15 kN, and for a container type designed for preparing a medium size coffee beverage is set to a value between 1 kN and 7 kN.

9. A coffee container for preparing a coffee beverage upon injection of liquid into the container, the coffee container comprising container wall member enclosing a predefined volume of between 5 ml to 50 ml filled with compacted coffee material such as roast and ground coffee particles, and wherein the coffee material is present in a form compacted under a compaction force of 0.5 to 15 kN.

10. The coffee container according to claim 9, wherein the height of the container is comprised between 5 mm and 30 mm.

11. A kit of coffee containers comprising at least two containers for preparing a coffee beverage upon injection of liquid into the container, the method comprising the steps of: selecting and providing container wall member for enclosing a predefined container volume, compacting an amount of bulk coffee material to a coffee tablet under predefined compaction force in the container volume between the container wall member, wherein the applied compaction force is set based on at least the provided container volume and/or on a particular type of beverage to be prepared from the provided container, and wherein the applied compaction force is set to a value between 0.5 to 15 kN, wherein the respective containers differ in a volume enclosed by the container wall member and/or in a particular type of beverage to be prepared from the respective containers, and wherein the coffee material in the respective containers is present in a form compacted under a different compaction force.

12. The kit according to claim 11, wherein the respective containers differ in their height but comprise an equal outer diameter.

13. The kit according to claim 11, wherein the kit comprises a first container having a container volume of between 5 ml and 15 ml.

14. The kit according to claim 11, wherein the compaction force for the coffee material in the container designed for preparing a short coffee beverage lies between 0.5 kN and 10 kN.

15. The kit according to claim 11, wherein the different containers of the kit comprise coffee material of different granulometry.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0045] Further features, advantages and objects of the present invention will become apparent for a skilled person when reading the following detailed description of embodiments of the present invention and when taken in conjunction with the figures of the enclosed drawings.

[0046] FIG. 1 shows preferred embodiments of containers with different volumes and/or designed for preparing different types of beverages according to the invention.

[0047] FIG. 2 shows alternative embodiments of containers with different volumes and/or designed for preparing different types of beverages according to the invention.

[0048] FIG. 3 shows a schematic flow diagram for a manufacturing process of a container in line with the invention.

[0049] FIG. 4 relates to measurement results for different containers comprising different applied compaction forces and showing the resulting flow time during injection into such containers dependent on the granulometry of the coffee material in the container.

[0050] FIG. 5 relates to measurement results for different containers comprising different applied compaction forces and showing the resulting yield of the extracted coffee beverage dependent on the granulometry of the coffee material in the container.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0051] FIGS. 1 and 2 relate to preferred embodiments of containers with different volumes according to the invention and which are preferably designed for preparing different types of beverages. Thereby, FIG. 1a to 1d relate to a first set or kit of containers 1a-1d. The containers 1a to 1d in FIG. 1a to 1d each comprise container wall means 2 and wall means 3a,3b,3c,3d respectively, which are connected at their circumference under formation of a flange-like rim portion 4.

[0052] The container wall means 2,3a-3d are preferably formed of an at least partially deformable material sheet which is preferably of circular shape. The container wall means enclose a predefined volume and are made of a sheet material comprised within the list of mono- or multi-layer film comprising paper or similar cellulosic material, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene-terephtalate (PET), a starch-based material, polylactic acid (PLA), and/or aluminium.

[0053] The containers differ in their respective sizes and thus in the respective volume enclosed therein. Thereby, all of the containers 1a-1d are preferably formed of the same first material sheet 2 of essentially convex form and uniform height h1, and a suitable second material sheet 3a,3b,3c,3d of essentially convex form but of differing size respectively providing a different resulting height h1,h2,h3,h4. The container 1a is preferably symmetric about a central plane in which the flange-like rim 4 is arranged.

[0054] The first and second material sheet 2 respectively 3a,3b,3c,3d preferably comprise a centrally arranged essentially planar portion 5,6. The first material sheet 2 is preferably designed for providing an outlet face of the container in a dedicated beverage preparation device, while the second material sheet 3a,3b,3c,3d is designed for providing an inlet face of the container in a dedicated beverage preparation device.

[0055] The overall height of the container 1a-1d is preferably comprised between 5 mm and 30 mm, more preferably between 10 mm and 22 mm. A diameter d2 of the respective container is preferably comprised between 30-70 mm, more preferably between 35 mm to 55 mm. An inner diameter d1 of the respective container is preferably comprised between 20-60 mm, more preferably between 30 to 50 mm.

[0056] The different containers preferably comprise a compacted coffee tablet in the container volume, which has been compacted during a manufacturing process of the container with a force between 0.5 and 15 kN, more preferably between 0.1 kN and 10 kN.

[0057] The compacted coffee tablet is preferably completely filling the inner volume of the container. The coffee material within the container volume preferably comprises a granulometry of between 150 to 600 μm. The coffee material enclosed in the respective container is preferably of a roasting value of between 50 and 120 CTN.

[0058] The different containers as shown in FIG. 1a-1d preferably differ at least in the weight of the coffee material enclosed in the provided volume, in the granulometry of the enclosed coffee material and in the applied compaction force during manufacturing of the container when forming the compacted coffee tablet. The different containers may as well differ in the roasting value of the coffee material. Optionally, also different coffee material respectively different blends of coffee material may be present in the respective containers. A preferred example for the above-indicated different parameters of the respective containers in FIG. 1a-1d is shown in table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 1A 1B 1C 1D Volume (ml) 10.53 13.55 18.05 20.8 Coffee weight (g) 5.5 7 8.5 10 Granulometry 210 300 350 420 (D [4, 3]-μm) Compaction force 1500 2500 2500 3000 (N) Final in-cup 40 110 200 350 beverage volume (ml) Coffee blend 50% Brazil WA 100% Colombia WA 40% Brazil UWA 60% Colombia WA 30% Ivory 30% Tanzania WA 40% Mexico WA Coast R 30% Guatemala WA 20% Papupa New Guinea Roasting colour 70 85 80 75 (CTN)

[0059] By means of adapting the respective compaction force applied when manufacturing the container based on at least the provided volume of the container for providing a particular beverage type and/or the granulometry of the contained ingredients, the beverage result for a particular container can be optimized for the intended purpose.

[0060] For example, an optimized result for a short cup, i.e. a ristretto or espresso type coffee beverage may be obtained with the container of example 1A. Thereby, the fine grind enables the acceleration of solids extraction in order to provide an intense cup. Further, a relatively lower compaction force leads to an increased yield during beverage preparation.

[0061] An optimized medium size beverage may be obtained by the containers of example 1B and 1C. Thereby, an intermediate particle size and moderate compaction force ensure a smooth extraction over the complete extraction time in order to obtain a balanced medium coffee beverage.

[0062] An optimized long cup, i.e. a lungo type coffee beverage, may be obtained by the container of example 1D. Thereby, a large particle size in combination with a relatively higher compaction force will avoid over-extraction for a very large serving while avoiding undesired off-notes.

[0063] The adaption of the compaction force based on the provided granulometry, the roasting value and/or the particular coffee blend and weight enables a further optimization of the obtained beverage result.

[0064] FIG. 2a-2c relate to alternative embodiments of a dedicated container respectively a kit comprising different containers 1e,1f,1g, which differ in the respective container volume.

[0065] By contrast to the embodiment in FIG. 1 the respective containers 1e,1f,1g comprise a first essentially planar material sheet 2a and different essentially convex shaped material sheets 3e,3f,3g. The latter are preferably of different size such that the resulting container comprise different heights h5,h6,h7. An inner and outer diameter of these containers d3,d4 is preferably constant. The inner and outer diameter preferably corresponds to the respective diameters d1,d2 of the containers according to FIG. 1a-1d. The height of the containers is preferably in the ranges as indicated above with respect to FIG. 1.

[0066] As explained with respect to the containers of FIG. 1a-1d, the containers of FIG. 2a-2c differ at least in the applied compaction force of the coffee tablet provided in the container. The containers may additionally differ in the nature and weight of the coffee material enclosed in the provided volume, in the granulometry of the enclosed coffee material, and/or in the roasting value of the coffee material.

[0067] FIG. 3 relates to a schematic representation of a preferred embodiment of a manufacturing process for forming the container according to the invention.

[0068] In the manufacturing process, a first step (not shown) relates to selecting a first and second enclosing sheets such as e.g. sheets 2 and one of sheets 3a-3d of FIG. 1 based on a desired volume of the resulting container respectively based on the beverage intended to be prepared by means of the resulting container. This first step preferably further comprises a determination and/or selection of the nature and weight of the coffee material enclosed in the provided volume, a selection of the granulometry of the coffee material, a selection of the roasting degree of the coffee material. Further, the compaction force to be applied during the manufacturing process is determined and set based on at least the selected container volume and/or based on the beverage intended to be prepared by means of the resulting container.

[0069] Then in a following step 7, the first enclosing sheet constituting e.g. a bottom foil of the container is formed and provided in a dedicated recess, die or mould of a suitable manufacturing device.

[0070] In a subsequent step 8, a predefined amount of a particular roast and ground coffee bulk material of predefined granulometry is provided on a surface of the first enclosing sheet.

[0071] In the next step 9, compaction of the coffee bulk material takes place under the set compaction force in order to compress the bulk material into a coffee tablet based on the intended container volume. This is obtained e.g. by means of a known compaction press which is pressed against the recess, die or mould in which the first enclosing sheet and the coffee bulk material is present. The applied compaction force is measured by a force measuring device connected to the compaction press.

[0072] In an alternative embodiment, the coffee bulk material is provided in a dedicated compaction press for being compacted under the predefined compaction force and the compacted coffee tablet is then provided onto the surface of the first enclosing sheet.

[0073] In a further step 10, the second enclosing sheet, e.g. a top foil, is then sealingly connected to the first enclosed sheet, for example by means of a gluing or welding technique. Thereby, the compacted coffee tablet is preferably enclosed in such a manner that the complete inner container volume is filled with the coffee tablet. Accordingly, preferably no free space, i.e. which is not filled by the coffee tablet, is available in the resulting container.

Example 1—Container for Short Cup

[0074] In the following, a preferred example for a container according to the invention is described, the container comprising a volume of 9.42 cm.sup.3 filled with coffee material of between 5.41 and 5.81 g and designed for preparing a short cup such as a ristretto or espresso type coffee beverage. The coffee material is preferably present in a granulometry of between 250 and 350 μm [D(4,3)]. The roasting degree lies between 70 and 80.

[0075] The compaction rate of the coffee material in the container lies between 40%-65%, preferably between 49-59%. This corresponds to an applied compaction force during the manufacturing process of between 1 kN and 2.5 kN. It is noted that the compaction rate of the coffee material in the final container does not necessarily correlate with the compaction force applied during the manufacturing process of the container, as the compaction rate not only depends on the compaction force but also on further parameters such as in particular the coffee particle size, the roasting degree and the density of the coffee particles in the container volume.

[0076] The above indicated compaction rate for the coffee tablet in the container is measured as follows. Notably, for compacting the coffee tablet a known hydraulic compaction press may be used which comprises a fixed upper punch member or die and a fixed lower punch member or die with a spring-loaded rod.

[0077] A real density value d.sub.v of the uncompressed bulk coffee material may be obtained by means of a helium pycnometer, e.g. an Ultrapycnometer 1000 of Quantachrome according to the following method.

[0078] The working principle of this measurement is to inject a gas such as helium with a given pressure into a reference chamber, then to expand this gas in the measuring chamber containing the sample by measuring the new gas pressure in this chamber. This method is particularly suitable for measuring the volumes and densities of divided or porous solids, as the gas penetrates into the cavities.

[0079] Hence, in order to obtain the real density value d.sub.v, the product to be analyzed is weighed in a cell. The cell is then placed in the measuring chamber of the pycnometer. The measuring chamber is then closed, and the measurement is started. At the end of the measurement the real density value of the analyzed product is obtained.

[0080] An apparent density d.sub.a of the compacted coffee tablet may be obtained based on the formula:

d.sub.a=m/V=m/(S*h),

in which:

[0081] m is the product mass of the compacted solid coffee tablet in grams

[0082] V is the volume of the compacted solid coffee tablet in cm.sup.3,

[0083] S is the surface of the solid compacted coffee tablet in cm.sup.2

[0084] h is the height of the solid compacted coffee tablet in cm measured e.g. with a caliper after ejecting the compacted coffee tablet from the press die used for compaction

[0085] Based on the above-indicated apparent density value d.sub.a and real density value d.sub.v, the compaction rate of the coffee tablet enclose in the container can be determined based on the following formula:

T=(d.sub.a/d.sub.v)*100.

[0086] Exemplary measurement results for the compaction rate of a container according to Example 1 are shown in table 2 below.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Compaction Rate Measurement R&G coffee Container Apparent Real density Compaction weight volume density (Pycnometer) Rate Trial (g) (cm.sup.3) (g .Math. cm.sup.3) (g .Math. cm.sup.3) (%) 1 5.81 9.42 0.62 1.09 56.4 2 5.75 9.42 0.61 1.05 58.4 3 5.62 9.42 0.60 1.20 49.6 4 5.41 9.42 0.57 0.99 57.8

Example 2—Container for Long Cups

[0087] This example relates to another preferred container comprising a volume of 16.6 cm.sup.3 filled with coffee material of between 7.80 and 8.10 g and designed for preparing a long cup such as a lungo type coffee beverage.

[0088] The coffee material is preferably present in a granulometry of between 300 and 650 μm [D(4,3)]. The roasting degree lies between 80 and 90. The present compaction rate for this container lies between 35-60%, preferably between 39-49%.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Compaction Rate Measurement R&G coffee Container Apparent Real density Compaction weight volume density (Pycnometer) Rate Trial (g) (cm.sup.3) (g .Math. cm.sup.3) (g .Math. cm.sup.3) (%) 1 8.10 16.6 0.49 1.229 39.70 2 7.80 16.6 0.47 1.071 43.87 3 8.00 16.6 0.48 1.181 40.80

[0089] The measurements of the trials for this example as indicated in the table above were obtained by means of the method as indicated above for example 1.

[0090] FIG. 4 relates to measurement results for different containers comprising different applied compaction forces and showing the resulting flow time during injection into such containers dependent on the granulometry of the coffee material in the container.

[0091] As can be seen from the graph in FIG. 4, for higher compaction forces such as 10 kN to 5 kN (see curves 12a-12c) the flow time relatively decreases faster with larger particle size compared to lower compaction forces such as 2.5 kN to 1 kN (see curves 12d and 12e). Thus, a smaller particle size has a higher impact on flow time increase at higher compaction forces compared to a bigger particles size. Therefore, the applied compaction force is preferably set relatively lower for a small particle size compared to a larger particle size.

[0092] FIG. 5 relates to measurement results for different containers comprising different applied compaction forces and showing the resulting yield of the extracted coffee beverage dependent on the granulometry of the coffee material in the container. Thereby, the yield for extracting a coffee beverage from the resulting container should ideally be above a value of 24% and preferably below 26%.

[0093] As can be seen in the graph in FIG. 5, the yield of the resulting coffee beverage decreases with increase in the granulometry of the used bulk coffee material. Further, the yield generally decreases with lower compaction forces (see curve 15a relating to a relatively higher compaction force of 10 kN to curve 15e relating to a relatively lower compaction force of 1 kN). Thereby, the relative decrease in yield with lower compaction force appears relatively constant over the whole particle range.

[0094] Based on the graphs described in FIGS. 5 and 6, a particular preferred embodiment of the invention provides a container for preparing a short coffee beverage, wherein an optimized yield (24-26%) is reached with a reasonable flow time (<40 seconds for 40 ml) at a compaction force of between 1 and 2.5 kN with a granulometry of between 200 and 300 μm, more preferably of about 250 μm.

[0095] It should be understood that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and without diminishing its attendant advantages.