DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTING SET POINTS FOR A HEATING/COOLING ELEMENT OF A CHROMATOGRAPHY COLUMN USING AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Abstract

The exemplary embodiments may determine a temperature set point for an outlet heater or cooler based on available information without requiring user input or requiring only minimal user input. The exemplary embodiments may estimate the temperature set point of the outlet heater based on available information, such as pressure delta along the column, temperature at the inlet of the chromatography column, and volumetric flow rate. In some instances, the estimate may be normalized for column dimensions, such as length and diameter. Tailing factor may also be used in determining the estimate. The estimate is not computationally burdensome and can be recalculated as the chromatography column is in use.

Claims

1. A chromatography system, comprising: a chromatography column having an inlet for receiving a mobile phase with an analyte and an outlet through which the mobile phase exits after flowing through the column; an outlet heater or cooler positioned to heat or cool at the outlet of the chromatography column; a controller for controlling an amount heating or cooling imparted by the heater or cooler, the controller configured for controlling the outlet heater or cooler to achieve a set point temperature for the outlet of the column, wherein the controller is configured to set the set point temperature for the outlet heater or cooler based on an estimate calculated from a temperature at the inlet of the chromatography column, a flow rate of the mobile phase and a pressure delta.

2. The chromatography system of claim 1, further comprising an inlet heater or cooler positioned to impart heating or cooling to the mobile phase at or in proximity to the inlet of chromatography column.

3. The chromatography system of claim 1, further comprising a vacuum insulating jacket for insulating at least a portion of the chromatography column.

4. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the pressure delta is one of a pressure delta along the chromatography column or a pressure delta across the system.

5. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the flow rate is a flow set for a pump in the chromatography system or is a flow rate through the column.

6. The chromatography system of claim 1, further comprising an inlet sensor for sensing the temperature at or in proximity to the inlet of the chromatography column.

7. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the flow rate and the pressure delta are used to estimate an amount of temperature increase or decrease realized by the mobile phase passing through the chromatography column.

8. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the estimate is additionally based on at least one dimension of the chromatography column and/or peak asymmetry in chromatographic data for the chromatography column.

9. The chromatography system of claim 8, wherein the at least one dimension of the liquid chromatography column comprises at least one of length of the chromatography column or diameter of the chromatography column.

10. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the chromatography system further comprises an inlet heater or cooler positioned to heat or cool the mobile phase at the inlet of the chromatography column having a set point temperature and wherein the controller assumes that the temperature at the inlet of the chromatography column is the set point temperature for the inlet heater.

11. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the chromatography system further includes a temperature sensor in proximity to the inlet and wherein the controller assumes that the temperature at the inlet of the chromatography column is the temperature sensed by the temperature sensor.

12. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the chromatography column is a liquid chromatography column.

13. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the chromatography column is supercritical fluid chromatography column.

14. The chromatography system of claim 1, further comprising a control loop for maintaining the temperature at the outlet at the set point.

15. The chromatography system of claim 1, wherein the controller estimates the set point temperature for the outlet heater or cooler (T.sub.out) as:
T.sub.out=T.sub.in+(ln(ΔP×F.sub.v)+offset)/adjustment factor, where T.sub.in is the temperature of the mobile phase at the inlet of the chromatography column, ln is a natural logarithm, ΔP is the pressure delta of the chromatography column, Fv is the flow rate of the mobile phase through the chromatography column, offset is an offset value, and adjustment factor is a value.

16. A controller for controlling an outlet heater or cooler of a chromatography column, comprising: a processing logic for: receiving a temperature at an inlet to the chromatography column, receiving a magnitude of pressure delta, receiving a flow rate of mobile phase; determining a temperature set point of the outlet heater or cooler from at least in part the temperature at the inlet to the chromatography column, the magnitude of the pressure delta and the flow rate of the mobile phase; and a signal generator for generating a control signal for controlling the temperature set point of the outlet heater or cooler.

17. The controller of claim 16, wherein the received temperature at the inlet is one of a temperature of the mobile phase at or near the inlet, a temperature of the inlet, a temperature set point of a mobile phase heater or an inlet heater or a temperature of the inlet.

18. A method of setting a desired temperature set point for an outlet heater or cooler for imparting heating or cooling to an outlet of a chromatography column in a chromatography system, comprising: determining with processing logic an estimate of the desired set point for the outlet heater or cooler based from a volumetric flow rate, a change in pressure and a temperature at an inlet of the chromatography column; and setting the desired set point for the outlet heater or cooler via a control signal to be the determined estimate.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the change in pressure is across the column or across the system.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the determining the estimate comprises determining the estimate of the desired set point (Tout) as:
Tout=Tin+(ln(ΔP×Fv)+offset)/adjustment factor, where Tin is the temperature of the mobile phase at the inlet of the chromatography column, ln is a natural logarithm, ΔP is the pressure delta of the chromatography column, Fv is the flow rate of the mobile phase through the chromatography column, offset is an offset value, and adjustment factor is a value.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0023] FIG. 1 depicts an illustrative chromatography system suitable for practicing an exemplary embodiment.

[0024] FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of calculating an estimate for a desired temperature set point.

[0025] FIG. 3A depicts a plot of empirical data illustrating a relationship between the natural logarithm of a product of volumetric flow rate and pressure drop along a column and outlet temperatures for a chromatography column.

[0026] FIG. 3B depicts optimal temperature delta values over different flow rates and tailing factors for a set of empirical data.

[0027] FIG. 3C plots power×tailing factor versus optimal temperature delta values to demonstrate a linear relationship in empirical data.

[0028] FIGS. 4A and 4B depict illustrative plots for different column pressure deltas having different optimal outlet temperatures.

[0029] FIG. 5 depicts a plot showing a chromatography system having better performance using the exemplary embodiment relative to an approach that uses a column oven.

[0030] FIG. 6 depicts a block diagram of a suitable control loop for the outlet heater.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0031] One of the difficulties in using an outlet heater with a chromatography column that deploys vacuum jacketed insulation is that it is difficult to determine the proper outlet heater temperature set point (i.e., the target temperature that the outlet heater desires to achieve). Using thermodynamic equations, one can determine the set point based on many parameters, including mobile phase flow rate through the chromatography column, mobile phase temperature, mobile phase composition, column dimensions (like length and diameter), column thermal conductivity, column inlet temperature and column pressure drop. Unfortunately, many of these parameters are not available to a control system for the outlet heater and may require user input. Matters are complicated by the set point being dynamic.

[0032] The exemplary embodiments may address these difficulties by determining the temperature set point for an outlet heater or cooler based on available information without requiring user input or requiring only minimal user input. The exemplary embodiments may estimate the temperature set point of the outlet heater or cooler based on available information, such as pressure delta along the column, temperature at the inlet of the chromatography column and volumetric flow rate. In some instances, the estimate may be normalized for column dimensions, such as length and diameter. The estimate is not computationally burdensome and can be recalculated as the chromatography column is in use.

[0033] As will be discussed below, empirical data evidences that the estimates determined using this approach may produce close to optimal results. As a result, the efficiency of the system (i.e., number of theoretical plates for a peak) may be improved and hence, the productivity and performance of the chromatography system may be increased.

[0034] The principles applied in the exemplary embodiments for heaters may also be applied to coolers or combination heating/cooling elements. Thus, the exemplary embodiments may also be used in environments where an outlet cooler is used rather than an outlet heater. The chromatography columns of the exemplary embodiments may be liquid chromatography columns or supercritical fluid columns. The columns may be packed columns, open tubular columns, or packed capillary column. Radial gradients seem to be especially of interest to packed columns approx. 1 mm internal diameter and above.

[0035] FIG. 1 depicts a diagram of an illustrative chromatography system 100 where an exemplary embodiment may be practiced. The chromatography system 100 includes a pump 102 for pumping a mobile phase (such as solvents) toward a chromatography column 110. An injector 104 is positioned on the flow path leading toward the chromatography column 110. The injector 104 injects a sample of analyte into the flow of the mobile phase from the pump 102. The injector 104 may include a valve, pump, a sample loop and connection to the analyte source in some embodiments. A mobile phase heater/cooler 106 may heat or cool the mobile phase prior to the mobile phase entering the chromatography column 110. An inlet heater/cooler 112 heats or cools at or near the inlet to the chromatography column 110. An outlet heater/cooler 114 heats or cools at or near the outlet of the chromatography column 110.

[0036] The chromatography column 110 may be surrounded by a vacuum insulating jacket 108. The vacuum insulating jacket is shown as surrounding the entire column and heaters 112 and 114. In alternative embodiments, the vacuum insulating jacket 108 surrounds only the column or a substantial portion of the column. A vacuum chamber may be formed between the outside of the chromatography column 110 and the walls of the jacket 108. The vacuum chamber may be formed by pumping out the air or atmospheric gas in the space surrounding the column thereby creating a vacuum chamber (with minimal atmospheric gas) as the insulating layer. An embodiment may also form the insulating layer surrounding the column by displacing the air or atmospheric gas in the space surrounding the column with an inert gas and then pumping out the inert gas in the space surrounding the column thereby creating a vacuum chamber (with minimal inert gas) as the insulating layer. Some embodiments may utilize a vacuum having a pressure of approximately equal to, or less than, 10.sup.−3 atm. The vacuum insulating jacket 108 used in an embodiment may generally be any suitable material that can withstand a vacuum and does not outgas. For example, the vacuum insulating jacket 108 may be made from one or more of steel, copper, brass, aluminum or other metals.

[0037] Temperature sensors A, B, C, D, E and F may be positioned at locations relative to the chromatography column 110. In the illustrative assembly depicted in FIG. 1, temperature sensors A and B are positioned near the leading end of the chromatography column 110, and temperature sensors C and D are positioned near the trailing end of the chromatography column 110. Temperature sensor E is positioned in proximity to the inlet of the chromatography column 110, and temperature sensor F is positioned in proximity to the outlet of the chromatography column 110. The temperature sensors A-F may be high accuracy sensors.

[0038] It should be appreciated that the chromatography assembly depicted in FIG. 1 is merely illustrative and not intended to be limiting. Other assembly configurations are possible in practicing exemplary embodiments.

[0039] The temperature set point for the outlet heater/cooler 114 is set to correct for the change in the temperature of the mobile phase exiting the chromatography column 110 at the outlet. The temperature set point for the outlet heater/cooler 114 is set by determining an estimate using available information. FIG. 2 depicts varieties of information that may be used in calculating the estimate that serves as the desired set point 212 for the outlet heater/cooler 114. The estimate may be determined from the pressure drop along the column 202, the inlet temperature for the column 204 and the volumetric flow rate through the column 206. A calculator or controller 210 may use these values 202, 204 and 206 to generate the estimate that serves as the desired set point 212 as will be described in more detail below. The calculator or controller 210 may be realized as a programmed computer, a microprocessor, electrical circuitry, a microcontroller, a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), for example.

[0040] The exemplary embodiments recognize that the pressure delta along the column 202 or through the system, the inlet temperature for the column 204, the column inlet temperature and the volumetric flow rate through the column or the flow set for a pump in the system are readily available value and may be used to generate an accurate estimate of the desired set point for instances where heaters are deployed. The exemplary embodiments recognize that the difference between the temperature at the column outlet and the temperature at the column inlet is proportional to the volumetric flow rate multiplied by the pressure drop and a measure of peak asymmetry in chromatographic data for the chromatography column, such as the USP tailing factor. The tailing factor is a measure of peak tailing. The tailing factor is the distance from the front slope of the peak to the back slope divided by twice the distance from the center line of the peak to the front slope, with all measurements made at 5% of the maximum peak height. The difference in temperature at the column outlet relative to the column inlet may be expressed in a relationship as:

T.sub.out−T.sub.in˜Fv×ΔP×Tf  (Equation 1)

where T.sub.out is the temperature at the outlet of the column, T.sub.in is the temperature at the inlet of the column, Fv is the volumetric flow rate, ΔP is the pressure drop along the column and. Tf is the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) tailing factor.

[0041] In another exemplary embodiment, the difference between the temperature at the column outlet and the temperature at the column inlet is proportional to the volumetric flow rate multiplied by the pressure drop multiplied by the column length. The tailing factor may also be used in conjunction with the other enumerated factors.

[0042] FIG. 3A depicts a plot 300 of ln(Fv×ΔP) and T.sub.out−T.sub.in. The plot shows the temperature difference values (such as points 304) and the curve of ln(Fv×ΔP) 302. The plot clearly shows the linear relationship, which can be expressed as:

ln(Fv×ΔP)=0.0957(T.sub.out−T.sub.in)+5.443  (Equation 2)

for a 2.1×100 mm column packed with 1.6 μm particles across various MP compositions, volumetric flow rates and inlet temperatures. An empirically derived offset of 5.443 and an adjustment factor are included. Using equation 3 and solving for outlet temperature results in:

T.sub.out=(ln(Fv×ΔP)−5.443)/0.0957+T.sub.in  (Equation 3)

Equation 3 may be used to generate the estimate of the desired temperature set point for the outlet heater in exemplary embodiments. T.sub.in may be determined as the temperature sensed by the temperature sensor in proximity to the outlet (e.g., temperature sensor E) or as the temperature set point for the inlet heater or cooler (e.g., heater or cooler 112).

[0043] The empirical data to derive these equations was largely from steady-state experiments i.e. isocratic. However, the broader application of the equations is to apply them to composition-programmed gradient elution separations. Experiments have shown that the relationship, although derived from isocratic conditions, still applies to the non-steady-state environment of a gradient separations. In such cases, the outlet target would be set based on the initial, isocratic portion of the gradient after the column has equilibrated to starting conditions.

[0044] T.sub.in may be chosen to be the set point of a heater in proximity (i.e., at or near) the inlet, a set point of a mobile phase heater positioned before the inlet, a sensor value of the temperature of the mobile phase at or near the inlet or a sensor value of the temperature at the inlet. The flow rate Fv may be chosen as the volumetric flow rate of the mobile phase through the column or the flow setting for a pump in the system. The pressure delta ΔP may be chosen as the pressure delta along the column or through the system.

[0045] In some embodiments, it may be desirable to normalize the equation for column dimensions that differ from the dimensions used in the above case that was used to derive Equation 3. Thus, the column dimensions 208 may be used as input to the calculator/controller 210 as well. To account for different length columns, Equation 3 may need to be divided by a normalizing factor proportional to the length.

[0046] Some empirical data also indicates that the optimal estimate of the temperature difference at the outlet relative to the inlet is affected by the tailing factor. FIG. 3B a histogram 310 of optimal differences between outlet temperature and inlet temperature for different tailing factors. Each tailing factor is associated with a bar. The bars are grouped by respective flow rates of 0.4 mL/min, 0.6 mL/min and 0.85 mL/min. The y axis is the optimal delta between outlet temperature and inlet temperature. As can be seen, the optimal delta increases as the tailing factor increases. For example, bars 312, 314, 316, 318 and 320 demonstrate this correlation.

[0047] FIG. 3C demonstrates that the relationship of the optimal delta with the volumetric flow rate, pressure drop and tailing factor is linear (as stated in Equation 1). The plot 330 depicts Power×Tf to optimal delta. Power may be equated with Fv×ΔP. A line 332 may be drawn through the points for the optimal delta values where the inlet temperature is 30 degrees C., and another line 334 may be drawn through the point for the optimal delta values where the inlet temperature is 50 degrees C.

[0048] One implication of Equation 3 is that T.sub.out varies with pressure delta. This can be seen in FIGS. 4A and 4B. FIG. 4A depicts a plot 400 the plates processed versus outlet temperature for a liquid chromatography column. As can be seen the shaded band 402, the optimal temperature to process the most plates is around 50 degrees Celsius for a low pressure delta for different solvent compositions. In contrast, for a high-pressure delta as shown in the plot 406 of FIG. 4B, the optimal temperature is around 70 degrees Celsius as show in shaded band 408.

[0049] A comparison of the performance of a column in an oven with performance of an insulated vacuum jacketed chromatography column is depicted in the plot 500 of FIG. 5. The diamond shaped points reflect the plates processed for the case where an oven is used and the triangular points reflect the plates processed for an insulated vacuum jacketed chromatography column where the outlet heater is set at a desired set point using the approach described herein. Until the flow rate reaches 0.5 mL/min, the performances of the two approaches largely are comparable. However, as the flow rates increase the approach of the exemplary embodiments outperforms the approach using the oven.

[0050] The chromatography assembly may deploy a PID control loop to adjust the heater to realize the desired set point. FIG. 6 depicts an example 600 of such a control loop. As was described above the desired temperature set point for the outlet heater 602 is determined and compared by an error node 604 with a temperature at the outlet of the chromatography column that is gathered by temperature sensor 606 positioned at or near the outlet. The error node 600 calculates an error signal between the two values. The error node 602 may be realized in hardware or a software and simply acts as an adder that calculates the difference between the two values 602 and the temperature as measured by temperature sensor 606. The resulting difference may be encoded in a signal that passes to control system 608 that generated a control signal. The control signal is sent to the outlet heater 610 to adjust the heat generated by the outlet heater 610.

[0051] As was mentioned above, in some instances coolers rather than heaters may be used at the inlet and the outlet of the chromatography column. For example, with CO.sub.2 mobile phases, the mobile phase may undergo adiabatic cooling as the mobile phase passes through a chromatography column. In that instance, an outlet cooler is needed. The above-described Equation 3 may still be used but T.sub.out is less than T.sub.in.

[0052] While exemplary embodiments have been described herein, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the intended scope as defined in the appended claims.