Processes and systems that deblend and attenuate source ghosts and source signatures in recorded seismic data obtained in a marine survey
11143772 · 2021-10-12
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G01V1/32
PHYSICS
G01V1/34
PHYSICS
International classification
G01V1/32
PHYSICS
G01V1/34
PHYSICS
Abstract
Processes and systems for deblending blended seismic data with attenuated source signatures and source ghost are described. Processes and systems compute blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield recorded in a marine survey of a subterranean formation. Downgoing vertical velocity wavefield is computed based on near-field pressure wavefields generated by source elements of sources activated in the marine survey. Deblended wavefield is computed based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefield and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield. The deblended wavefield may be used to generate an image of the subterranean formation with the source signatures and source ghosts contained in the blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield.
Claims
1. In a process for generating an image of a subterranean formation using marine seismic techniques in which sources are activated in a body of water above the subterranean formation and receivers located in the body of water to record overlapping reflected wavefields from the subterranean formation as a blended pressure wavefield and a blended vertical velocity wavefield in a data-storage device, the specific improvement comprising: computing blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the recorded blended pressure wavefield and the recorded blended vertical velocity wavefield; computing downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on near-field signatures of source elements of the multiple sources; computing deblended wavefield based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefield and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield; and generating an image of the subterranean formation based at least in part on the deblended wavefield, thereby enhancing resolution of the image by using the deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein computing the blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the recorded blended pressure and the recorded blended vertical velocity comprises: for each receiver location transforming the blended pressure wavefield from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain; transforming the blended vertical velocity wavefield from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain; computing the blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield; and transforming the blended upgoing pressure wavefield to the space-frequency domain.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein computing the downgoing vertical velocity wavefield comprises: computing a direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on near field pressure wavefield measurements proximate the source elements of the multiple sources; computing scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on an incident pressure wavefield and a reflection coefficient; and combining the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield with the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield to obtain the downgoing vertical velocity wavefield.
4. The process of claim 3, wherein computing the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield comprises: for each source of the sources computing a notional source signature for each source element of the source based on the near-field signatures obtained from the pressure wavefield measurements proximate the source elements of the source; computing a derivative of a free-space Green's functions with respect to depth; and computing the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on the derivative of the free-space Green's function and the notional source signatures of the source.
5. The process of claim 3, wherein computing the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield comprises: for each source of the multiple sources computing an incident pressure wavefield based on the notional source signatures of each source element; computing a reflection coefficient based on a Kirchhoff approximation of coherent plane wave reflections from the free surface of the body of water and a Kirchhoff approximation of incoherent fluctuating scattered wavefields create by the free surface; computing an extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield of the plane wave reflection coefficient based on the reflection coefficient; and computing the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on the incident pressure wavefield and the extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein computing deblended wavefield comprises: computing matrix elements of a correlation wavefield matrix based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefields and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields; computing elements of a point spread function matrix based on the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields; and computing a deblended wavefield matrix with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts based on the correlation wavefield matrix and the point spread function matrix.
7. A computer system for computing an image of a subterranean formation from a recorded blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield obtained in a marine survey of the subterranean formation, the system comprising: one or more processors; one or more data-storage devices; and machine-readable instructions stored in the one or more data-storage devices that when executed using the one or more processors controls the system to perform the operations comprising: computing a blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the blended pressure wavefield and the blended vertical velocity wavefield; computing downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on notional source signatures of source elements of multiple sources activated in the marine survey; computing deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefield and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield; and generating an image of the subterranean formation based at least in part on the deblended wavefield.
8. The computer system of claim 7 wherein computing the blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the recorded blended pressure wavefield and the recorded blended vertical velocity wavefield comprises: for each receiver location transforming the blended pressure wavefield from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain; transforming the blended vertical velocity wavefield from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain; computing the blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the blended pressure wavefield and the blended vertical velocity wavefield; and transforming the blended upgoing pressure wavefields to the space-frequency domain.
9. The computer system of claim 7 wherein computing the downgoing vertical velocity wavefield comprises: computing a direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on the notional source signatures of the source elements; computing a scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on an incident pressure wavefield and a reflection coefficient; and combining the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield with the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield to obtain the downgoing vertical velocity wavefield.
10. The computer system of claim 9, wherein computing the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield comprises: for each source of the multiple sources computing the notional source signature of each source element of the source based on near-field pressure wavefield measurements proximate the source elements of the source; computing a derivative of a free-space Green's functions with respect to depth; and computing the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on the derivative of the free-space Green's function and the notional source signatures of the source.
11. The computer system of claim 9, wherein computing the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield comprises: for each source of the multiple sources computing an incident pressure wavefield based on the notional source signatures of each source element; computing a reflection coefficient based on a Kirchhoff approximation of coherent plane wave reflections from the free surface of the body of water and a Kirchhoff approximation of incoherent fluctuating scattered wavefields created by the free surface; computing an extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield of the plane wave reflection coefficient based on the reflection coefficient; and computing the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on the incident pressure wavefield and the extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield.
12. The computer system of claim 7 wherein computing deblended wavefield comprises: computing matrix elements of a correlation wavefield matrix based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefields and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields; computing elements of a point spread function matrix based on the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields; and computing a deblended wavefield matrix with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts based on the correlation wavefield matrix and the point spread function matrix.
13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with machine-readable instructions that implement a method performed by one or more processors of a computer system to perform operations comprising: computing blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on a blended pressure wavefield and a blended vertical velocity wavefield recorded in a marine survey of a subterranean formation; computing downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on near-field pressure wavefields generated by source elements of sources activated in the marine survey; computing deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefield and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield; and generating an image of the subterranean formation based at least in part on the deblended wavefield.
14. The medium of claim 13 wherein computing the blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the recorded blended pressure wavefield and the recorded blended vertical velocity wavefield comprises: for each receiver location transforming the blended pressure wavefield from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain; transforming the blended vertical velocity wavefield from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain; computing upgoing pressure wavefield based on the blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield; and transforming the upgoing pressure wavefields to obtain the space-frequency domain.
15. The medium of claim 13 wherein computing the downgoing vertical velocity wavefield comprises: computing a direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on near field pressure wavefield measurements proximate the source elements of the multiple sources; computing scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on an incident pressure wavefield and a reflection coefficient; and combining the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield with the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield to obtain the downgoing vertical velocity wavefield.
16. The medium of claim 15, wherein computing the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield comprises: for each source of the multiple sources computing a notional source signature for each source element of the source based on the near-field pressure wavefields of the source elements of the source; computing a derivative of a free-space Green's functions with respect to depth; and computing the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on the derivative of the free-space Green's function and the notional source signatures of the source.
17. The medium of claim 15, wherein computing the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield comprises: for each source of the multiple sources computing an incident pressure wavefield based on the notional source signatures of each source element; computing a reflection coefficient based on a Kirchhoff approximation of coherent plane wave reflections from the free surface of the body of water and a Kirchhoff approximation of incoherent fluctuating scattered wavefields create by the free surface; computing an extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield of the plane wave reflection coefficient based on the reflection coefficient; and computing the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on the incident pressure wavefield and the extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield.
18. The medium of claim 13 wherein computing deblended wavefield comprises: computing matrix elements of a correlation wavefield matrix based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefields and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields, computing elements of a point spread function matrix based on the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields; and computing a deblended wavefield matrix with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts based on the correlation wavefield matrix and the point spread function matrix.
19. Apparatus for generating an image of a subterranean formation from recorded blended pressure wavefield and recorded blended vertical velocity wavefield collected in a marine seismic survey of the subterranean formation, the apparatus comprising: means for computing blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the blended pressure wavefield and the blended vertical velocity wavefield; means for computing downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on near-field pressure wavefields generated by source elements of multiple sources activated in the marine survey; means for computing deblended wavefield based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefield and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield; and means for generating an image of the subterranean formation based at least in part on the deblended wavefield.
20. The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the means for computing the blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the recorded blended pressure wavefield and the recorded blended vertical velocity wavefield comprises: for each receiver location transforms the blended pressure wavefield from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain; transforms the blended vertical velocity wavefield from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain; computes upgoing pressure wavefield based on the blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield; and transforms the upgoing pressure wavefields to obtain the space-frequency domain.
21. The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the means for computing the downgoing vertical velocity wavefield comprises: means for computing a direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on near field pressure wavefield measurements proximate the source elements of the multiple sources; means for computing scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on an incident pressure wavefield and a reflection coefficient; and means for combining the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield with the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield to obtain the downgoing vertical velocity wavefield.
22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the means for computing the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield comprises: for each source of the multiple sources computes a notional source signature for each source element of the source based on the near-field pressure wavefields of the source elements of the source; computes a derivative of a free-space Green's functions with respect to depth; and computes the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on the derivative of the free-space Green's function and the notional source signatures of the source.
23. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the means for computing the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield comprises: for each source of the multiple sources computes an incident pressure wavefield based on the notional source signatures of each source element; computes a reflection coefficient based on a Kirchhoff approximation of coherent plane wave reflections from the free surface of the body of water and a Kirchhoff approximation of incoherent fluctuating scattered wavefields create by the free surface; computes an extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield of the plane wave reflection coefficient based on the reflection coefficient; and computes the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield based on the incident pressure wavefield and the extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield.
24. The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the means for computing deblended wavefield comprises: computes matrix elements of a correlation wavefield matrix based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefields and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields; computes elements of a point spread function matrix based on the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields; and computes a deblended wavefield matrix with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts based on the correlation wavefield matrix and the point spread function matrix.
25. A method for manufacturing a geophysical data product, the method comprising: retrieving recorded blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield stored in a data-storage device, the recorded blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield obtained in marine survey of a subterranean formation; computing blended upgoing pressure wavefield based on the blended pressure wavefield and the blended vertical velocity wavefield; computing downgoing vertical velocity wavefield based on near-field pressure wavefields generated by source elements of multiple sources activated in the marine survey; computing deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts based on the blended upgoing pressure wavefield and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield; generating an image of the subterranean formation based at least in part on the deblended wavefield; and storing the image in a non-transitory computer-readable medium.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(29) In a traditional marine survey, seismic data is recorded in separate shot records. Each shot record is obtained by activating a source followed by recording reflected wavefields in a recording time interval of about 8-12 seconds. In recent years, continuous recording and simultaneous source acquisition (“SSA”) techniques have emerged as alternative ways to record seismic data in a marine survey. With continuous recording, sources, or different combinations of source elements of the same source, are activated in the water above a subterranean formation with randomized activation times and at generalized locations while overlapping reflected wavefields are continuously recorded as blended seismic data. With SSA, multiple sources are activated in the body of water above the subterranean formation in activation time intervals (e.g., about 1-3 seconds) to create multiple overlapping reflected wavefields that are recorded as blended seismic data in a shot record following the activation time interval. SSA increases acoustic illumination of the subterranean formation and diversity of the recorded seismic data in teens of fold, azimuth, and offsets over traditional single source activation and can improve the efficiency of data acquisition due to shorter time interval between source activations relative to those in traditional surveys.
(30) The blended seismic data obtained with continuous recording or SSA contains a record of the overlapping reflected wavefields and nonessential source wavefields. The source wavefields include source signatures that correspond to a portion of each source wavefield that travels directly to the receivers and source ghosts created by source wavefields reflected downward from the free surface before reaching the receivers. The source wavefields are regarded as noise, because source signatures and source ghosts contain no information about the subterranean formation. Processes and systems described herein are directed to deblending blended seismic data to form gathers of deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts. Each gather of deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts may be further processed to generate high-resolution images of a subterranean formation.
(31) Marine Seismic Surveying
(32)
(33)
(34) Streamer depth below the free surface 112 can be estimated at various locations along the streamers using depth-measuring devices attached to the streamers. For example, the depth-measuring devices can measure hydrostatic pressure or utilize acoustic distance measurements. The depth-measuring devices can be integrated with depth controllers, such as paravanes or water kites that control and maintain the depth and position of the streamers as the streamers are towed through the body of water. The depth-measuring devices are typically placed at intervals (e.g., about 300-meter intervals in some implementations) along each streamer. Note that in other implementations buoys may be attached to the streamers and used to maintain the orientation and depth of the streamers below the free surface 112.
(35)
(36) Returning to
(37) The waves that compose the reflected wavefield may be generally reflected at different times within a range of times following the source wavefield. A point on the formation surface 122, such as the point 138, may receive a pressure disturbance from the source wavefield more quickly than a point within the subterranean formation 120, such as points 140 and 142. Similarly, a point on the formation surface 122 directly beneath the source 104 may receive the pressure disturbance sooner than a more distant-lying point on the formation surface 122. Thus, the times at which waves are reflected from various points within the subterranean formation 120 may be related to the distance, in three-dimensional space, of the points from the activated source.
(38) Acoustic and elastic waves may travel at different velocities within different materials as well as within the same material under different pressures. Therefore, the travel times of the source wavefield and reflected wavefield may be functions of distance from the source as well as the materials and physical characteristics of the materials through which the wavefields travel. In addition, expanding wavefronts of the wavefields may be altered as the wavefronts cross interfaces and as the velocity of sound varies in the media traversed by the wavefront. The superposition of waves reflected from within the subterranean formation 120 in response to the source wavefield may be a generally complicated wavefield that includes information about the shapes, sizes, and material characteristics of the subterranean formation 120, including information about the shapes, sizes, and locations of the various reflecting features within the subterranean formation 120 of interest to exploration seismologists.
(39) Each receiver 118 may be a multicomponent sensor including particle motion sensors and a pressure sensor. A pressure sensor detects variations in water pressure over time. The term “particle motion sensor” is a general term used to refer to a sensor that may be configured to detect particle displacement, particle velocity, or particle acceleration over time. .sub.r,
.sub.si, t), where
.sub.r represents the Cartesian coordinates (x.sub.r, y.sub.r, z.sub.r) of a receiver,
.sub.si represents the Cartesian coordinates (x.sub.si, y.sub.si, z.sub.si) of N.sub.s sources with source subscript i=1, . . . , N.sub.s (e.g., N.sub.s=5 in
(
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t), where the vector
represents the direction along which particle displacement is measured. A particle motion sensor that measures particle velocity (i.e., particle velocity sensor) generates particle velocity wavefield data denoted by ν
(
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t). A particle motion sensor that measures particle acceleration (i.e., accelerometer) generates particle acceleration data denoted by a
(
.sub.r,
.sub.si, t). The data generated by one type of particle motion sensor may be converted to another type. For example, particle displacement data may be differentiated to obtain particle velocity wavefield data, and particle acceleration data may be integrated to obtain particle velocity wavefield data.
(40) The teen “particle motion data” is a general teen used to refer to particle displacement data, particle velocity wavefield data, or particle acceleration data. The term “seismic data” refers to pressure wavefield data and/or particle motion data. Particle displacement data represents a particle displacement wavefield, particle velocity wavefield data represents a particle velocity wavefield, and particle acceleration data represents a particle acceleration wavefield. The particle displacement, velocity, and acceleration wavefield data are correspondingly called particle displacement, velocity, and acceleration wavefields.
(41) The particle motion sensors are typically oriented so that the particle motion is measured in the vertical direction (i.e., =(0,0,z)) in which case g.sub.z(
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t) is called vertical wavefield displacement data, νz(
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t) is called vertical velocity wavefield, and a.sub.z(
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t) is called vertical acceleration wavefield. Alternatively, each receiver may include two additional particle motion sensors that measure particle motion in two other directions,
.sub.1 and
.sub.2 that are orthogonal to
(i.e.,
.Math.
.sub.1=
.Math.
.sub.2=0, where “.Math.” is the scalar product) and orthogonal to one another (i.e.,
.sub.1.Math.
.sub.2=0). In other words, each receiver may include three particle motion sensors that measure particle motion in three orthogonal directions. For example, in addition to having a particle motion sensor that measures particle velocity in the z-direction to give ν.sub.z(
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t), each receiver may include a particle motion sensor that measures the wavefield in the in-line direction in order to obtain the in-line velocity wavefield, ν.sub.x(
.sub.r,
.sub.si, t), and a particle motion sensor that measures the wavefield in the cross-line direction in order to obtain the cross-line velocity wavefield, ν.sub.y(
.sub.r,
.sub.si, t). In certain implementations, the receivers may be only pressure sensors, and in other implementations, the receivers may be only particle motion sensors. The three orthogonal velocity wavefield sets form a velocity wavefield vector
=(ν.sub.x,ν.sub.y,ν.sub.z).
(42) The streamers 106-111 and the survey vessel 102 may include sensing electronics and data-processing facilities that allow seismic data generated by each receiver to be correlated with the time each source is activated, absolute positions on the free surface 112, and absolute three-dimensional positions with respect to an arbitrary three-dimensional coordinate system. The pressure wavefield and particle motion wavefield may be stored at the receiver, and/or may be sent along the streamers and data transmission cables to the survey vessel 102, where the data may be stored electronically, magnetically, or optically on data-storage devices located onboard the survey vessel 102 and/or transmitted onshore to data-storage devices located is a seismic data-processing facility.
(43) Each pressure sensor and particle motion sensor may include an analog-to-digital converter that converts time-dependent analog signals into discrete time series that consist of a number of consecutively measured values called “amplitudes” separated in time by a sample rate. The time series data generated by a pressure or particle motion sensor is called a “trace,” which may consist of thousands of samples collected at a typical sample rate of about 1 to 5 samples per millisecond. A trace is a recording of a subterranean formation response to acoustic energy that passes from an activated source, into the subterranean formation where a portion of the acoustic energy is reflected and/or refracted, and ultimately detected by a sensor as described above. Each trace records variations in time-dependent amplitudes that correspond to fluctuations in acoustic energy of the wavefield measured by the sensor. In general, each trace is an ordered set of discrete spatial and time-dependent pressure or motion sensor amplitudes denoted by:
tr(.sub.r,
.sub.si,t)={A(
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t)}.sub.j=0.sup.J−1 (1)
(44) where
(45) tr represents pressure, particle displacement, particle velocity, or particle acceleration amplitude;
(46) A represents amplitude;
(47) t.sub.j is the j-th sample time; and
(48) J is the number of time samples in the trace.
(49) The coordinate location .sub.r of each receiver may be calculated from global position information obtained from one or more global positioning devices located along the streamers and/or the towing vessel, from depth measuring devices, such as hydrostatic pressure sensors, and the known geometry and arrangement of the streamers and receivers. The receiver and source locations varies with time and may also be denoted by
.sub.r=
.sub.r (t)=(x.sub.r(t),y.sub.r (t),z.sub.r (t)) and
.sub.si=
.sub.si(t)=(x.sub.si(t),y.sub.si(t),z.sub.si(t)). Each trace also includes a trace header not represented in Equation (1) that identifies the specific receiver that generated the trace, receiver and source GPS spatial coordinates, receiver depth, and may include time sample rate and the number of time samples.
(50) Reflected wavefields from the subterranean formation typically arrive first at the receivers located closest to the sources. The distance from the sources to a receiver is called the “source-receiver offset,” or simply “offset.” A larger offset generally results in a longer arrival time delay. The traces are collected to form a “gather” that can be further processed using various seismic data processing techniques to obtain information about the structure of the subterranean formation. The traces may be sorted into different domains, such as a common-shot domain, common-receiver domain, common-receiver-station domain, and common-midpoint domain. For example, a collection of traces sorted into the common-shot domain are called a common-shot gather and a collection of traces sorted into common-receiver domain are called a common-receiver gather. The portion of the acoustic signal that is reflected into the body of water from the subterranean formation and travels directly to the receivers is called a primary reflected wavefield or simply a “primary.” Other portions of the acoustic energy that are reflected upward into the body of water and that reverberate between the free surface and the subterranean formation before reaching the receivers are called free-surface multiple reflected wavefields or simply “free-surface multiples.” Other portions of the acoustic energy that are reflected upward into the body of water directly to receivers after having reverberated within the subterranean formation are called subsurface multiple reflections or simply “subsurface multiples.”
(51)
(52) Each trace records the source signature, source ghost, primaries, and various types of free surface and subsurface multiples. For example, pressure wavefield p(.sub.r,
.sub.s2,t) generated at the receiver 402 records hydrostatic pressure changes due to the source signature, source ghost, primaries, and multiples. The vertical velocity wavefield 12, ν.sub.z(
.sub.r,
.sub.s2,t) also generated at the receiver 402 records the particle velocity changes due to the direct source wavefield, source ghost, primaries, and multiples. The pressure wavefield p(
.sub.r,
.sub.s2,t) and the vertical velocity wavefield ν.sub.z(
.sub.r,
.sub.s2,t) record both upgoing and downgoing pressure and vertical velocity wavefields, respectively, that reach the receiver 402.
(53)
(54) Traditional marine seismic surveys are performed by recording reflected wavefields in separate shot records following each activation of a source. The duration of the time interval between any two successive activations of the source is selected so that the acoustic energy of reflected wavefields created by previous activations of the source are minimized in a shot record created following a subsequent activation of the source. For example, a traditional marine survey may be performed by activating a source about every 10 to 12 seconds. Reflected wavefields are often recorded in shot records for about 8 to 12 seconds immediately following each activation of the source. The recording time interval of about 8 to 12 seconds minimizes the acoustic energy of reflected wavefields in a shot record created for a subsequent activation of the source, while minimizing the overall time for the marine survey.
(55)
(56) By contrast, with continuous recording, seismic data is continuously recorded while sources, or subsets of source elements, are activated at randomized times and locations.
(57) With simultaneous source acquisition (“SSA”), multiple sources are activated in a body of water above a subterranean formation. While each source is activated to create a source wavefield, the acoustic energy created by previously activated sources continues to spread out and interact with the subterranean formation, creating overlapping reflected wavefields emanating from the subterranean formation. In SSA, all the sources are not necessarily activated at the same time. The multiples sources may be activated at random or according to a predetermined sequence to create the overlapping reflected wavefields. While the sources are activated, the overlapping reflected wavefields may be continuously recorded as blended seismic data in one or more data-storage devices. The blended seismic data comprises a blended pressure wavefield and/or a blended vertical velocity wavefield recorded by corresponding pressure and particle motion sensors.
(58)
(59)
Seismic Imaging
(60)
(61) In
Computing Deblended Wavefield with Attenuated Source Signatures and Source Ghosts from Blended Seismic Data
(62) Processes and systems for deblending blended seismic data with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts are described below. The following description of
(63) Acoustic reciprocity of time convolution (See e.g., Seismic Applications of Acoustic Reciprocity, by J. T Fokkema and P. M. van den Berg, pp. 95-103, Elsevier Science 1993) gives the following integral relationship, in the space-frequency domain, between a blended up-going pressure wavefield and downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields created by N.sub.s sources:
(64)
(65) where
(66) ρ is the density of the body of water;
(67) ω is the angular frequency;
(68) Σ.sub.i=1.sup.N.sup..sub.r,
.sub.si) is the blended upgoing pressure wavefield at receiver location
.sub.r;
(69) Σ.sub.i=1.sup.N.sup..sub.sep|
.sub.si) is the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield at a location
.sub.sep on a planar separation level located between the sources and the receiver; and
(70) R.sub.sub.sup.−+(ω,.sub.r,
.sub.sep) is the deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts at the receiver location
.sub.r.
(71) The sign ‘−’ denotes an upgoing wavefield. The sign ‘+’ denotes a downgoing wavefield. The combination of signs ‘−+’ denotes a receiver-side upgoing wavefield and a source-side downgoing wavefield. The bar ‘|’ in the wavefields of Equation (2), and subsequent equations, separates receiver locations on the left-hand side of the bar from source locations on the right-hand side of the bar. The depth of a planar virtual separation level, denoted by S.sub.sep, is located between the sources and the receiver with z.sub.si>z.sub.sep>z.sub.r for i=1, . . . , N, and z.sub.sep is the depth of the separation level S.sub.sep. The blended upgoing pressure wavefield of Equation (2) may be computed by applying wavefield separation to the blended pressure wavefield recorded at the receiver location .sub.r in the manner described below with reference to Equations (8a)-(10). The downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield of Equation (2) may be modeled using notional source signatures obtained from nearfield measurements of pressure wavefields generated by the source elements of the sources as described below with reference to Equations (11)-(22).
(72) .sub.s1,
.sub.s2,
.sub.s3, and
.sub.s4. The four sources 1101-1104 may be sources as described above with reference to
.sub.r, such as the receiver described above with reference to
.sub.r|
.sub.si).
(73) .sub.sep of virtual receiver on the separation level S.sub.sep is given by Σ.sub.i=1.sup.4V.sub.sz.sup.+(ω,
.sub.sep|
.sub.si).
(74) .sub.r|
.sub.sep), represents acoustic energy that propagates downward from a virtual source at a location
.sub.sep along the separation level S.sub.sep and is reflected upward from the subterranean formation 1110 to the receiver 1106 at the location
.sub.r. For example, ray path 1128 represents acoustic energy that propagates downward from the virtual source 1128 and is reflected upward from the subterranean formation 1110 to the receiver 1106. The acoustic energy represented by ray path 1128 is a reflection event from the subterranean formation that does not include the source signatures and source ghosts.
(75) Equation (2) equates an upgoing pressure wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts to the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefields of N.sub.s sources and the deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts based on acoustic reciprocity.
(76) The integral relationship of Equation (2) may be computed using a summation approximation:
(77)
(78) where
(79) .sub.sep∈S.sub.sep represents locations on the separation level S.sub.sep; and
(80) Δ.sub.sep=Δx.sub.sepΔy.sub.sep is separation between space-apart locations in the x- and y-directions on the separation level.
(81) Equation (3) may be used to form a system of equations for N.sub.r receivers and N.sub.sep virtual receivers, or virtual sources, at the separation level S.sub.sep:
P.sup.−≈−2iωρR.sub.sub.sup.−+V.sub.sz.sup.+ (4)
(82) where
(83) P.sup.− is an N.sub.r×1 blended upgoing pressure wavefield matrix;
(84) V.sub.sz.sup.+ is an N.sub.sep×1 downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield matrix; and
(85) R.sub.sub.sup.−+ is an N.sub.r×N.sub.sep a deblended wavefield matrix with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts.
(86) System of Equations (4) relates the blended upgoing wavefield matrix P.sup.− to a product of the matrix R.sub.sub.sup.−+ of deblended wavefield data with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield matrix V.
(87) .sub.rj|
.sub.si), where receiver subscript j=1, . . . , N.sub.r. Each element of the column matrix 1302 is a trace of blended upgoing pressure wavefield seismic data recorded by one of the N.sub.r receivers for activation of N.sub.s sources. Column matrix 1304 displays the matrix elements of the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield matrix V.sub.sz.sup.+. Elements of the column matrix 1304 are given by Σ.sub.i=1.sup.N.sup.
.sub.sepk|
.sub.si), where locations at the separation level have a subscript k=1, . . . , N.sub.sep Matrix 1306 displays the matrix elements of the deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts. Elements of the matrix 1306 are given by R.sub.sub.sup.−+(ω,
.sub.rj|
.sub.sepk) where j=1, . . . , N.sub.r, and k=1, . . . , N.sub.sep. Each element of the deblended wavefield matrix 1306 is a trace of deblended wavefield data with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts at one of the N.sub.r receivers. However, the deblended wavefield matrix R.sub.sub.sup.−+ cannot be computed directly from the system of Equations (4), because the system of Equations (4) is underdetermined.
(88) A system of equations used to solve for the matrix R.sub.sub.sup.−+ may be formed by introducing an intermediate level, denoted by S.sub.arb, between the sources and the separation level S.sub.sep, where locations on the intermediate level S.sub.arb are denoted by .sub.arb=(x.sub.arb,y.sub.arb,z.sub.arb) with z.sub.si>z.sub.arb>z.sub.sep for i=1, . . . , N.sub.s. Let Σ.sub.i=1.sup.N.sup.
.sub.arb|
.sub.si) represent the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield at a location
.sub.b on the intermediate level S.sub.arb in the space-frequency domain.
(89) .sub.arb of the intermediate level S.sub.arb is given by Σ.sub.i=1.sup.4V.sub.sz.sup.+(ω,
.sub.arb|
.sub.si)
(90) Equation (3) is multiplied on both the left-hand side and the right-hand side by a Hermitian transpose of the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield at a location .sub.arb of the intermediate level S.sub.arb to obtain
(91)
(92) and the superscript “H” denotes the Hermitian transpose.
(93) The wavefield C(ω,.sub.r|
.sub.arb) is the correlation wavefield between the blended upgoing pressure wavefield and the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield. The wavefield δ(ω,
.sub.sep|
.sub.arb) is the point spread function for the downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield between the separation and intermediate levels. Equation (5a) couples the point spread function and the deblended wavefield with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts to the correlation wavefield.
(94)
(95) Equations (5a)-(5c) may be used to fond a system of equations for N.sub.r receivers, N.sub.sep virtual receivers at the separation level S.sub.sep, and N.sub.arb virtual sources at the intermediate level S.sub.arb
C≈2iωρR.sub.sub.sup.−+Γ (6)
(96) .sub.rj|
.sub.arbq), where locations on the intermediate level S.sub.arb have a subscript q=1, . . . , N.sub.arb. Elements of the point spread matrix Γ 1604 are given by δ(ω,
.sub.sepk|
.sub.arbq), where k=N.sub.sep and q=1, . . . , N.sub.arb. The deblended wavefield matrix R.sub.st may be computed using the system of Equations (6) by applying a least squares optimization. The deblended wavefield matrix with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts is given by
(97)
Each element R.sub.sub.sup.−+ (ω,.sub.rj|
.sub.sepk) of the matrix R.sub.sub.sup.−+ is a trace of seismic data with attenuated source signature and source ghost at the receiver location
.sub.rj. Elements of the matrix R.sub.sub.sup.−+ may be selected to form gathers of seismic data with attenuated source signatures and source ghosts in different domains and may be further processes according to the steps of
Determining the Blended Upgoing Pressure Wavefield
(98) The blended upgoing pressure wavefield Σ.sub.i=1.sup.N.sup..sub.r|
.sub.si) of Equations (2) and (3) may be computed from the blended pressure wavefield and blended vertical velocity wavefield measured at collocated pressure and particle motion sensors. Let Σ.sub.i=1.sup.N.sup.
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t) represent the blended pressure wavefield created by the N.sub.s sources and measured by a pressure sensor at the receive location
.sub.r. Let Σ.sub.i=1.sup.N.sup.
.sub.r,
.sub.si,t) represent the blended vertical velocity wavefield created by the N.sub.s sources and measured by a particle motion sensor collocated with the pressure sensor at the receive location
.sub.r. The blended pressure and vertical velocity wavefields are transformed from the space-time domain to the wavenumber-frequency domain using a discrete Fourier transform (“DFT”) or a fast Fourier transform (“FFT”) as represented by
(99)
(100) where
(101) k.sub.x is the wavenumber in the x-direction; and
(102) k.sub.y is the wavenumber in the y-direction.
(103) The blended upgoing pressure wavefield in the wavenumber-frequency domain is given by
(104)
(105) where
(106)
is the wavenumber in the z-direction.
The blended upgoing pressure wavefield of Equation (9) is transformed from the wavenumber-frequency domain to the space-frequency domain using an inverse DFT or an inverse FFT obtain the blended upgoing pressure wavefield in the space-frequency domain:
(107)
Downgoing Vertical Velocity Source Wavefield Modeling
(108) The downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield may be modeled in the space-frequency domain using the following equation:
V.sub.sz.sup.+(ω,.sub.sep|
.sub.s)=V.sub.szinc.sup.+(ω,
.sub.sep|
.sub.s)+V.sub.szscat.sup.+(ω,
.sub.sep|
.sub.s) (11)
(109) where
(110) V.sub.szinc.sup.+(ω,.sub.sep|
.sub.s) is the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield; and
(111) V.sub.szscat.sup.+(ω,.sub.sep|
.sub.s) is the scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield.
(112) The direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield may be modeled using notional source signatures by
(113)
(114) where
(115) s.sub.i(ω) is the notional source signature of the pressure wavefield generated by the i-th source element of a source;
(116) N is the number of source elements; and
(117) G.sub.0(ω,.sub.sep|
.sub.s) is a free-space Green's function.
(118) In three-dimensional space, the free-space Green's function is given by
G.sub.0(ω,.sub.sep|
.sub.s)=−exp(ik|
.sub.sep−
.sub.s|)/4π|
.sub.sep−
.sub.s|
where k is the wavenumber of the direct incident downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield.
(119) When source elements of a source, such as the source elements of the source 200 in
(120)
(121)
(122) The near-field signature output by the j-th pressure sensor of a source element may be represented as the superposition of the notional signatures of the source elements:
(123)
(124) where
(125) p.sub.j.sup.NFS is a near-field signature of the j-th source element as recorded by a corresponding nearest pressure sensor to the j-th source element;
(126) s.sub.i is the notional signature of the i-th source element;
(127) R is the free-surface reflectivity (e.g., R=−1); and
(128) N is the number of source elements.
(129) When the source consists of N pressure sensors and N source elements, there are N independent equations in the form of Equation (13). The N independent equations form a system of N equations with N unknown notional signatures s.sub.i(t). The N independent equations may be solved numerically for the N unknown notional signatures s.sub.i(t). The notional source signatures s.sub.i(t) may be transformed using DFT or FFT from the time domain to the frequency domain to obtain the notional source signature s.sub.i(w) in Equation (12).
(130) The scattered downgoing vertical velocity source wavefield of Equation (11) may be approximate by
(131)
(132) where
(133) P.sub.inc(ω,.sub.sep,
.sub.s) is the incident pressure wavefield generated by the source at the location
.sub.s and virtual receiver at the location
.sub.sep′ of a second separation level S.sub.sep′; and
(134)
(135) where
(136) .sup.sep is the wavevector at the separation level S.sub.sep;
(137) .sup.sep′ is the wavevector at the second separation level S.sub.sep′;
(138) .sub.dz=
.sup.sep−
.sup.sep′;
(139) k.sub.dz=k.sup.sep−k.sup.sep′;
(140) k.sub.z.sup.sep is the wavenumber at the separation level S.sub.sep in the z-direction; and
(141) k.sub.z.sup.sep′ is the wavenumber at the separation level S.sub.sep′ in the z-direction.
(142) The second separation level S.sub.sep′ is located at depth between the sources and the free surface in the same manner as the separation level S.sub.sep. The wavefield R.sub.V.sub..sub.sep|
.sub.sep′) is an extrapolated obliquity correction wavefield of the plane wave reflection coefficient R.sub.coef(ω,
.sup.sep|
.sup.sep′)
(143) The incident pressure wavefield P.sub.inc(ω,.sub.sep′|
.sub.s) in Equation (14) may be computed from the notional signatures. Let
.sub.sep′=(x.sub.P,y.sub.P,z.sub.P) represent a location on the second separation level S.sub.sep′. The incident pressure wavefield in the far field is given by:
(144)
(145) where r.sub.iP is the distance from the location of the i-th source to the location .sub.P in the far field.
(146) The incident pressure wavefield p.sub.inc(.sub.sep,
.sub.s,t) may be transformed from the space-time domain to the space-frequency domain using DFT or FFT to obtain the incident pressure wavefield P.sub.inc(ω,
.sub.sep′|
.sub.s)
(147) The plane wave reflection coefficient R.sub.coef(ω,.sup.sep|
.sup.sep′) in Equation (15) represents the reflectivity of the free surface at mean sea level. When the seismic data is recorded in calm free surface conditions (e.g., wave heights less than about half a meter), the plane wave reflection coefficient may be set to |R.sub.coef(ω,
.sup.sep|
.sup.sep′)|≤1 (i.e., a flat free surface approximation). When seismic data is recorded in rough free surface conditions (e.g., wave heights greater than about half a meter), the plane wave reflection coefficient may be estimated based on a stochastic representation of the free surface conditions. The plane wave reflection coefficient may be decomposed into coherent and incoherent components:
R.sub.coef(ω,.sup.sep|
.sup.sep′)=R.sub.coh(ω,
.sup.sep|
.sup.sep′)+R.sub.incoh(ω,
.sup.sep|
.sup.sep′) (17)
The coherent component R.sub.coh(ω,.sub.sep|
.sup.sep′) represents the mean of the plane wave reflection coefficient. The incoherent component R.sub.incoh(ω,
.sub.sep|
.sup.sep′) represents the reflection coefficient of the fluctuating scattered wavefield created by the free surface. For a rough free surface with measured wave height variation that follows a Gaussian distribution with zero mean free surface level and a non-zero wave height standard deviation, σ, the coherent component at the mean free surface level may be analytically approximated by:
R.sub.coh.sup.KA(ω,.sup.sep|
.sup.sep′)=−exp{−2[k.sub.z.sup.rσ].sup.2}δ(
.sup.sep|k.sup.sep′) (18)
and, the incoherent component may be analytically approximated by:
(148)
(149) where
(150) superscript KA denotes a Kirchhoff approximation;
(151) k.sub.z.sup.r is wavenumber in the z-direction;
(152) .sup.sep′ is the wavevector at the separation level S.sub.sep;
(153) .sup.sep′ is the wavevector at the second separation level S.sub.sep′;
(154) δ(⋅) is the Dirac delta operator;
(155) .sub.dz=
.sup.sep−
.sup.sep′;
(156) k.sub.dz=k.sub.sep−k.sub.sep′; and
(157) C() is a free surface correlation function.
(158) The analytical coherent and incoherent components are Kirchhoff approximations of the coherent and incoherent plane wave reflection coefficient at the mean free surface level.
(159)
(160)
(161)
(162)
(163)
(164)
(165)
(166) The processes and systems disclosed herein may be used to manufacture a geophysical data product indicative of certain properties of a subterranean formation. A geophysical data product may be manufactured by using the processes and systems described herein to generate geophysical data and storing the geophysical data in a computer-readable medium 2528. The geophysical data may be pressure data, vertical velocity data, upgoing and downgoing wavefields, deblended wavefield with attenuated source ghost and source signature, and any image of a subterranean formation computed using the processes and systems described herein. The geophysical data product may be produced offshore (i.e., by equipment on the survey vessel 102) or onshore (i.e., at a computing facility on land), or both.
Simulation Results
(167)
(168) It is appreciated that the previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present disclosure. Various modifications to the embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited strictly to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.