Process for Producing Paper or Paperboard, in Particular Label Paper or Paperboard Suited for Use as Packaging Material for Beverage Containers, and Paper or Paperboard Produced by This Process

Abstract

A method for producing label paper or paper for corrugated board or folding carton for packaging of beverage containers has the steps of feeding wood fiber pulps into a papermaking process and forming a web mixture. The web mixture has the wood fiber pulp, a cationic polymer, an anionic polymer, and a cationic starch. The cationic starch is added to the wood fiber pulp only after the addition of the anionic polymer and cationic polymer.

Claims

1. A method for producing label paper or corrugated board or folding carton for packaging of beverage containers, comprising the steps of: feeding wood fiber pulps into a paper-making process; forming a web mixture comprising the wood fiber pulp, a cationic polymer, an anionic polymer and a cationic starch; wherein the cationic starch is added to the wood fiber pulp only after the addition of the anionic polymer and cationic polymer.

2. The method according to claim 1, the cationic polymer is added to the wood fiber pulp prior to the addition of the anionic polymer.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the cationic polymer comprises polyamideamine epichlorohydrin (PAE).

4. The method according to claim 3, the amount of PAE added to the wood fiber pulp ranging between 1 and 40 kg/ton of wood fiber pulp (dry weight), preferably between 1.5 and 4.5 kg/ton of wood fiber pulp (dry weight).

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the anionic polymer comprises carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC).

6. The method according to claim 5, the amount of CMC added to the wood fiber pulp ranging between 0.1 and 10 kg/ton of wood fiber pulp (dry weight), preferably between 0.5 and 2 kg/ton of wood fiber pulp (dry weight).

7. The method according to claim 1, the amount of cationic starch added to the wood fiber pulp ranging between 1 and 40 kg/ton of wood fiber pulp (dry weight), preferably between 5 and 15 kg/ton of wood fiber pulp (dry weight).

8. The method according to claim 1, comprising providing a reaction time in between the addition of cationic polymer and the addition of anionic polymer to the web mixture of wood fiber pulp.

9. The method according to claim 1, comprising providing a reaction time in between the addition of anionic polymer and the addition of cationic starch to the web mixture of wood fiber pulp.

10. A fiber product, comprising: a fiber web; and an at least partially cured resin composition, wherein, preferably prior to curing, the resin composition comprises: a cationic polymer, preferably polyamide-epichlorohydrin; an anionic polymer, preferably carboxymethyl cellulose; and cationic starch, wherein the cationic starch is added after the addition of the anionic polymer and the cationic polymer, wherein the fiber product has a wet tensile strength of at least 7 N.Math.m/g (ISO3781:2011) and/or a wet tear resistance of at least 9 mN.Math.m.sup.2/g, preferably at least 9.5 mN.Math.m.sup.2/g (ISO1794:2012).

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0026] FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate two alternative process schemes of a method according to the present invention;

[0027] FIG. 3 shows a set-up of a forming section of a paper making machine that can be used in a method according to the present invention;

[0028] FIGS. 4 to 10 show characteristics of specific fiber products made during trials of the method of the present invention.

[0029] The following components are shown in the drawings:

TABLE-US-00001  1: Wire pit  2: Front chest  3: Storage chest  4: Headbox pump  5: Screen  6: Headbox  7: Fibers out of process  8: Fibers back to chest  9: Driven roll 10: Steering guide, tension measurement 11: High Vacuum 12: Vacuum box with friction measurement 13: Transfer vacuum box 14: Vacuum box 1 15: MB unit 16: Apron board

DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

[0030] The present invention concerns a method for producing label paper or corrugated board or folding carton for packaging of beverage containers, comprising the steps of: [0031] feeding wood fiber pulps into a paper-making process; [0032] forming a web mixture comprising the wood fiber pulp, a cationic polymer, an anionic polymer and a cationic starch;
characterized in that the cationic starch is added to the wood fiber pulp only after the addition of the anionic polymer and cationic polymer.

[0033] FIGS. 1 and 2 show two alternative preferred process schemes of a method according to the present invention, wherein in FIG. 1, the chemicals in particular a cationic polymer (such as polyamideamine epichlorohydrin (PAE)); an anionic polymer (preferably comprising carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC)); and cationic starch are dosed online to the furnish between a front chest and a headbox. In FIG. 2, the chemicals are dosed into the furnish sequentially yet in batch to a storage chest for the furnish, downstream of the front chest and the further downstream headbox.

[0034] Both process schemes were used for some trials of papermaking as discussed in more detail below.

[0035] Raw Materials and Application of Chemicals

[0036] In the trials a furnish was used consisting of 80% ‘southern pine, Alabama river’ and 20% hardwood (birch). The pulp mixture was refined in one batch to freeness 495 ml (refined 1000 kg in Valmet, Rautpohja). Clearly, this furnish is only provided as an example, as numerous variants can be used without departing from the present invention.

[0037] The applied chemicals for the trials were: [0038] PAE: Kymene 25 X-Cel (Solenis), 1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 kg/ton [0039] CMC: Finnfix 5 (CP Celco), 1.0 or 2.0 kg/ton [0040] Cationic Starch: Raisamyl 50021 (Chemigate), 5 or 15 kg/ton [0041] Retention aid: cationic polyacrylamide cPAM, Fennopol 3400 (Kemira), 200 g/ton

[0042] The chemicals were alternatively dosed online before the headbox (FIG. 1) or to the batch of furnish (FIG. 2).

[0043] In the online addition of the chemicals (FIG. 1) the interaction time between chemicals with each other and pulp mixture (or furnish) was some seconds whereas in batch dosage (FIG. 2) interaction time was several of minutes. In both cases the addition order of the chemicals was the same: 1. PAE (cationic polymer), 2. CMC (anionic polymer), 3. Cationic starch, 4. C-PAM (retention aid). The addition places and interaction time of additives before forming section (head box) are presented in schematic layout pictures of online dosage (FIG. 1) and batch dosage (FIG. 2).

[0044] Forming Section Set-Up and Running Parameters

[0045] The pilot machine consists of an approach system with different kind of containers, a forming section (FIG. 3) that can be run in gap, hybrid or fourdrinier mode, and of a press section (not shown). In the trial, the pilot machine was run in the hybrid-forming mode at speed of 400 m/min. The consistency of furnish in head box was 0.6%. The forming section configuration is shown in the FIG. 3.

[0046] The press section (FIG. 3) consisted of a 1-nip shoe press having a 350 mm extended nip. The nip pressure was varied at three different levels: 400, 800 and 1200 kN/m. After the wet pressing, the paper web was reeled and sheet samples were collected and dried in cylinder drier for the laboratory analyses.

[0047] Measurements from Wire Water, Furnish in Headbox, Wet Web and Dry Sheet

[0048] Process conditions and process inputs were measured and recorded on-line in Wedge data acquisition system.

[0049] In order to make easier to view the results the geometric average values were calculated from the machine direct (MD) and cross direct (CD) data.

[0050] Produced Conditions

[0051] Different conditions were produced and sampled in the pilot machine trial. The total 22 trial points are listed in table 1. During the trials some trial points were rejected based on too low or high basis weight (missing numbers in the table 1).

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 (table split in 2 parts) Online - PAE to former's Online - CMC to front chest between of Additives PAE addition headbox pump AER, PAE consistency and screen Kymene 25 (25% active CMC, CMC X-Cel material Finnfix addition Trial dosage content) 5 dosage consistentcy Day Target Point [kg/tn] [%] [kg/tn] [%] 1 Reference 1 — — — — 1 Online dosage 2 1.5 0.5 — — 1 Reference 3 — — — — 1 Online dosage 4 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.35 New furnish 1 Reference 5 — — — — 1 Online dosage 6 3.0 0.5 1 Reference 9 — — — — 1 Online dosage 10 3.0 0.5 2.0 0.35 New furnish 1 Reference 12 — — — — 1 Online dosage 14 4.5 1.0 — — 1 Reference 15 — — — — 1 Online dosage 16 4.5 1.0 2.0 0.35 1 Online dosage 17 4.5 1.0 2.0 0.35 PAE, kg/tn Batch - PAE to CMC, kg/tn Batch - CMC to Sampo's wire pit Sampo's wire pit Batch add consistency Batch add consistency treatment % treatment % First - 10 min Second - 15 min treatment time treatment time 2 Run through trials 18 3.0 1.0 — — 2 Run through trials 19 3.0 1.0 — — 2 Run through trials 20 3.0 1.0 — — 2 Run through trials 21 3.0 1.0 — — New furnish 2 Run through trials 22 3.0 1.0 2   0.35 2 Run through trials 23 3.0 1.0 2   0.35 2 Run through trials 24 3.0 1.0 2   0.35 2 Run through trials 25 3.0 1.0 2   0.35 2 Run through trials 26 3.0 1.0 2   0.35 NOTE: 20 sheets/trial point, heat treatment of the dry samples; 10 min in 105 C. Online - Starch C-PAM to to Retamixer, Retamixer, farther to closer to headbox headbox Starch, Starch addition C-PAM Raisamyl consistancy Fennopol Pressing Trial 50021 dosage [%] 3400 Line Load Day Target Point [kg/tn] [%] [g/tn] [kN/m] 1 Reference 1 — — 200 800 1 Online dosage 2  5 1.1 200 800 1 Reference 3 — — 200 800 1 Online dosage 4  5 1.1 200 800 New furnish 1 Reference 5 — — 200 800 1 Online dosage 6 15 1.1 200 800 1 Reference 9 — — 200 800 1 Online dosage 10 15 1.1 200 800 New furnish 1 Reference 12 — — 200 800 1 Online dosage 14 15 1.1 200 800 1 Reference 15 — — 200 800 1 Online dosage 16 15 1.1 200 800 1 Online dosage 17 15 1.1 200 800 Starch, kg/tn Batch - CMC to C-PAM, g/tn Sampo's wire pit Batch add consistency treatment % Third - 30 min Online 2 Run through trials 18 15 1.1 200 800 2 Run through trials 19 15 1.1 200 1200 2 Run through trials 20 15 1.1 200 400 2 Run through trials 21 15 1.1 200 800 New furnish 2 Run through trials 22 15 1.1 200 800 2 Run through trials 23 15 1.1 200 1200 2 Run through trials 24 15 1.1 200 400 2 Run through trials 25 15 1.1 200 800 2 Run through trials 26 15 1.1 200 800 NOTE: 20 sheets/trial point, heat treatment of the dry samples; 10 min in 105 C.

[0052] Furnish Analyses

[0053] The pH or conductivity of the furnish were not chemically modified in the trials. The pH of the furnish (measured from the headbox furnish sample) was between 7.7 and 8.1 in all trial points. It is known that PAE (wet strength agent) works best in neutral or alkaline pH area. Correspondingly, the conductivity was ˜180 μS in all trial points. The pH and conductivity values were very close to what was applied in the preliminary laboratory scale trials.

[0054] The freeness of the original refined pulp mixture was 475 ml. In the FIG. 4 are presented freeness values measured from the furnish samples sampled from the headbox. On the online dosage day the freeness value was found to level to around 500 ml. In the first trial points (reference points only measured) 1 and 3 was probably less fines washed to the white water when the pulp was recycled in the pilot compared to the trial points from 5 to 15. In the batch dosing day (run through trials) was new fresh pulp and waters changed after running reference point 18 thus, the furnish base in 18 and 22 should be comparable.

[0055] Beta-Formation

[0056] In the FIG. 5 can be seen that the method of the present invention did not significantly influence the beta-formation values. The furnish consisted 80% of very long southern pine fibers thus the increased flocculation of the furnish would have seen in big increase of beta-formation value. Because the formation remained in same level no significant changes in coatability or printability of the product are expected when the new strength aid solution would be utilized in the paper/board mills.

[0057] Dewatering Characteristics

[0058] In the FIGS. 6 and 7 are presented dryness values after forming section and pressing section. Based on the online dosing trial points the method of the present invention had only minor effect on the total vacuum level in the forming section (samples from the batch dosing trial day were not taken). Correspondingly, the after wet pressing dryness was not significantly changed by the method according to the present invention in online dosing or in batch dosing trial points.

[0059] Structural Characteristics

[0060] The average grammage of the trial points (FIG. 8) was in online dosing points 100±5 g/m2. In the batch dosing trial points (run through trials) the grammage was lower 91±3 g/m2. Additionally, a very low grammage trial point 53 g/m2 was executed. The low grammage trial point offers possibility to preliminary estimate the potential to reduce grammage with the method according to the present invention.

[0061] The method according to the present invention did not significantly influence on the bulk of the sheet. Thus, no change expected in the bending resistance of the product. Further in the batch dosage trial points the air permeance was not changed by the method according to the present invention.

[0062] Wet Sheet Strength Properties

[0063] The conventional wet and dry strength solution: PAE with starch was found to increase wet tear index up to 250% compared to reference with no strength aids. The method according to the present invention increased wet tear resistance further by 28% (FIG. 9). The results indicate that online dosage with short interaction times of the chemicals could be possible. Likewise, the method according to the present invention increased wet tensile index (16%). (FIG. 10)

[0064] Conclusions

[0065] A method according to the present invention was found to have no or no significant influence on dewatering in forming and pressing sections. Additionally, sheet formation was not affected by the dosing strategy of the chemicals in accordance with the present invention. The results indicates that wet and dry strength aids could be applied in online or in batch dosing system.

[0066] Overall, in the pilot trials was demonstrated that method of the present invention could bring end product quality benefits over conventional strength aid solution. Wet strength properties of the sheet increased significantly (wet tear index +28% and wet tensile index +16%). Alternatively, the grammage could be decreased by 25% (from 95 to 70 g/m.sup.2) without decrease in wet tear strength.

[0067] The above characteristics of the, make the fiber product according to the present invention suitable for use as label paper or corrugated board or folding carton for packaging of beverage containers, where wet tear strength and wet tensile strength are key features.