Tunable Stiffness Menstrual Device
20210307954 · 2021-10-07
Assignee
Inventors
- Andrew Ross Miller (Venice, CA, US)
- Jane Hartman Adamé (Venice, CA, US)
- Lauren Schulte Wang (Venice, CA, US)
- Clementine Dakota Gilbert (New York, NY, US)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A menstrual device with a reservoir portion and a rim portion where the rim element is comprised of stiffer higher durometer resilient material while the reservoir portion is made from a softer lower durometer material. Additionally, other portions of the menstrual device may have differing durometer materials. The menstrual device may be configured with a compression relief element to help improve the overall folding of the device for use.
Claims
1. A menstrual device comprising: a body portion having an exterior surface and an interior surface and being made of a material having a first durometer and defining a generally circular shape, wherein the interior surface defines a reservoir and wherein the exterior surface defines a first diameter; a resiliently foldable rim connected to the body portion and being a material having a second durometer wherein the second durometer is higher than the first durometer.
2. The menstrual device of claim 1, wherein the second durometer material is partially enclosed within the first durometer material.
3. The menstrual device of claim 1, wherein the body portion comprises an internal stiffener element disposed between the exterior surface and the interior surface and wherein the internal stiffener element is made of a material with a higher durometer than the first durometer.
4. The menstrual device of claim 3, wherein the internal stiffener element is made of the different material from that of the body portion.
5. The menstrual device of claim 1, further comprising a stem element connected to a bottom portion of the body, wherein the stem element has an elongated body that extends from the body portion downward beneath the body portion.
6. The menstrual device of claim 5, wherein the stem is having a durometer softer than the second durometer material.
7. The menstrual device of claim 1, wherein the rim has a cross sectional shape selected from a group consisting of triangular, “U” shaped, and curved upper and lower edges.
8. The menstrual device of claim 1, wherein the body portion and the resiliently foldable rim are made from the same material.
9. The menstrual device of claim 1, wherein the body portion and the resiliently foldable rim are made from the different materials.
10. The menstrual device of claim 1, further comprising a transition location between the first and second durometer materials and wherein the transition location is positioned at a location selected from the group consisting of within the rim, within the body portion, and between the rim and the body portion.
11. A menstrual device comprising a body portion having an exterior surface and an interior surface defining a generally circular shape, wherein the interior surface defines a reservoir and wherein the exterior surface defines a first diameter; a resiliently foldable rim connected to the body portion having an outer diameter and an inner diameter wherein the outer diameter is larger than the first diameter, wherein the rim has a predefined height and a thickness; and at least one compression relief element disposed within the resiliently foldable rim such that it extends from the inner diameter to a distance that is less than the predefined thickness.
12. The menstrual device of claim 11, wherein the at least one compression relief element is a notch of removed material.
13. The menstrual device of claim 11, wherein the at least one compression relief element has a cross section selected from a group consisting of “V” shaped, semicircle, and quarter circle.
14. The menstrual device of claim 11, wherein the at least one compression relief element is a portion of the rim that is thinner than the remainder of the rim such that the thickness of the rim is less than the predefined thickness.
15. The menstrual device of claim 14, wherein the portion of the rim that is thinner is between 0.1 and 90 degrees wide.
16. The menstrual device of claim 14, wherein the portion of the rim that is thinner is thinner than the predefined thickness but more than half the predefined thickness.
17. The menstrual device of claim 14, wherein the portion of the rim that is thinner is thinner than half the predefined thickness.
18. The menstrual device of claim 11, wherein the predefined height is between 5 and 16 mm high.
19. The menstrual device of claim 11, wherein the predefined thickness is between 3 and 10 mm.
20. The menstrual device of claim 11, wherein the at least one compression relief element has a transition point between the compression relief element and a main body of the rim, and wherein the transition point is a smooth edge.
21. The menstrual device of claim 11, further comprising at least two compression relief elements.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0034] The description will be more fully understood with reference to the following figures, which are presented as exemplary embodiments of the invention and should not be construed as a complete recitation of the scope of the invention, wherein:
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0051] Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods of a menstrual device with a number of alternative features that can allow for improved use such as multiple durometer materials as well as embedded geometric features are described. In many embodiments of the invention, the menstrual device contains a resilient rim connected to a reservoir portion where the rim and reservoir are foldable such that it can be folded and inserted into a vaginal canal. In accordance with various embodiments, the rim of the device may contain multiple durometer materials. For example, an internal portion of the rim may have a higher durometer material that is stiffer and subsequently the external portion or a portion of the rim surrounding the internal portion may have a softer or lower durometer material. Additionally, many embodiments may have multiple durometers in various other portions of the menstrual device, such as the catchment area or the removal aid portion. In a number of various embodiments, the rim may be configured with one or more notches or geometric spaces that can allow for improved bending capabilities of the rim to help improve the insertion of the device.
[0052] The term “durometer” is known within the art as a measure of hardness of material such as plastic, rubber, silicone, or any other non-metallic material. In addition to the general definition known in the art, “durometer” within the context of the application can refer to the relative stiffness of the material. Therefore, when one material has a durometer that is greater than another material it may be considered to be stiffer than the other material. The opposite is also true.
[0053] The stiffness or level of resiliency of a menstrual device can affect the insertion, comfort, fit, leak protection and removal of the menstrual devices specifically, menstrual cups and discs must deform to a collapsed shape for insertion and have enough resilience to hold shape when inserted and to spring open once inserted. Once inserted, the product must hold its shape while conforming to the anatomy to provide a leak resistant fit and seal. Such resilient features tend to require a stiffer material in order to perform accordingly. Meanwhile, the device must be compliant enough to adapt to the body in different activities and body positions while being comfortable. Ideally, a product is imperceptible when worn. These various ideal properties of cups and discs have competing engineering considerations. A stiffer cup is easier to open once inserted but harder to collapse into shape for insertion. Moreover, a stiffer cup maintains a position better within the user in a variety of activities. However, stiffer materials tend to be more perceptible to the user. As a result, various devices on the market are sold to be stiffer or less stiff to accommodate different customer preferences. Existing products also try to modulate stiffness in different regions by changing thickness, inserting localized areas of thickness like ridges. The clearest example are devices which provide ridging to help translate compressive forces at the base up the cup to aid in the deformation required to break the seal for most traditional cups before removal. However, such devices tend to lead to a large number of different devices that can saturate the market and may not be comfortable to the end user. Furthermore, existing menstrual discs and cups often do not maintain a compressed shape on insertion through the vaginal canal and instead tend to flare open during insertion leading to difficulty and discomfort for the user.
[0054] Increasing the stiffness of the rim region of the device increases the device's ability to maintain a compressed shape under loading conditions of insertion. However, the geometric designs of existing menstrual discs and cups limit the usefulness of many higher stiffness materials such as a high durometer silicone. The net effect of these competing engineering constraints is that traditional geometric designs limit the size and shape of the device that will naturally require a compressed or folded configuration while maintaining rigidity in that compressed shape.
[0055] For example, the bending of a beam fundamentally illustrates the same mechanics as the bending of the rim of menstrual cup devices. As illustrated in
[0056] This stress/strain relationship can be especially important in the use of menstrual disc and/or cups as they are requiring to be folded for insertion. Menstrual discs, for example, are typically pinched at the center by a user, forming two lobes, one on the leading end of the device and one on the non-leading end. Each of the lobes undergo both tension and compression and is ultimately designed to expand and widen on insertion. More rigid material tends to produce wider lobes due to the material properties. Accordingly, leading lobes under traditional configurations will be wide and stiff which can present difficulties with insertion. Many embodiments described herein are directed to improvements to the geometry and material properties of the rim that allow for reduced width and improved flexibility of the leading lobe while maintaining or improving the material stiffness that maintains or increases the transfer of force along the device during insertion before buckling.
Embodiments of a Menstrual Device with Multiple Durometer Material
[0057] Turning now to the figures, many embodiments of a menstrual device that is manufactured of multiple durometer materials can be seen.
[0058] Accordingly, numerous embodiments may be manufactured in such a way that the rim portion 302 is made of a single durometer material. Additionally, the catchment portion 304 may be made of a second material that is entirely a separate durometer from that of the rim portion 302. Many such embodiments may be manufactured in any number of ways. However, various embodiments may be molded in the same molding process. For example, a first step may mold one portion, either catchment or rim of the specified durometer material. The second step may include the molding of the remaining portion of the device 300. Additionally, some embodiments many utilize a stitching or bonding of the two durometer materials at a given transition point. In some embodiments, silicone may be used in which silicone of different durometers will bond at the stitch point during the molding process.
[0059] As can be appreciated the stitch line or transition between the different materials can be located in a number of different locations. For example,
[0060]
[0061] Turning now to
[0062] In accordance with some embodiments, the catchment portion 504 may also be made of one or more durometer materials. For example, a portion of the catchment area 504, such as one half, may have a higher durometer than the remaining portion of the catchment area 504. The higher durometer portion can aid in the interaction of the device 500 with the pubic bone (not shown) when inserted. Accordingly, many embodiments may have an asymmetrical design with respect to the durometer of the materials.
[0063] Although
[0064] As can be appreciated, many embodiments may use one or more durometer materials in the manufacturing of the menstrual device. As illustrated above, numerous embodiments may have a portion or multiple portions of the device made from one durometer type material while the remaining portion(s) are made from a second durometer type material. It can be appreciated that any combination of durometers may be used so as to meet the desired specifications of form, fit, and function of the device. In a number of embodiments, the materials can be the same or may be different materials that correspondingly work with the same and/or different durometers. Additionally, although various embodiments are illustrated, it should be understood that embodiments may be presented individually or in combination with any other embodiments illustrated herein.
Embodiments of the Materials
[0065] As described earlier, the durometer or stiffness of the material can be important to the level of comfort for the end user. Accordingly, various embodiments may incorporate a number of different materials that are safe for use as well as have a variety of durometers that can be used throughout embodiments of the device. For example, as shown above with respect to
Embodiments of the Rim Design
[0066] In accordance with many embodiments, the internal potion of the rim can vary in shape and cross section. This may help to accommodate the various types of materials that can be used to produce the many different embodiments of a menstrual device. As illustrated in
[0067] In accordance with many embodiments, the form, fit, and function of the final product or device can be important. Accordingly, it can be appreciated that the method of manufacture of such devices can play an important role in the production of a quality product that is adaptable to many users. In accordance with many embodiments, menstrual devices described herein, with multiple durometer materials, can be produces using an overmolding process. The overmolding is when a first material is formed and then a second material is molded over the first. The overmolding process allows for a wider range of material combinations and durometers to be used. For example, some embodiments may use a plastic or metallic inner rim portion that is over molded with a softer low durometer silicone type material.
[0068] As can be readily appreciated, the rim design of a menstrual device can take on any number of different configurations that can help improved the insertion capabilities of the device. For example, as described above,
[0069] Turning now to
[0070] Similarly,
[0071] As can be appreciated, improving the flexibility or foldability of the rim of a menstrual device while maintaining the resiliency necessary to expand the rim into place can be done in a number of different ways. In other words, the relief mechanism of the rim can be embodied with a number of alternative features and/or material characteristics that allow for such folding to take place. For example,
[0072] As illustrated throughout the figures, the relief can be configured in a number of different ways in a number of various embodiments. As such,
[0073] Turning now to
[0074] Although the figures illustrate the placement of the relief mechanism or decompression feature at a particular position on the rim, it should be understood that the feature may be located anywhere on the rim. Additionally, the location of the relief feature may be referred to in radial degrees as it is located on a generally circular rim. For example, some embodiments may position the relief feature between 0.1 and 90 degree sweep. Other embodiments may place the relief feature between 0.1 and 45 degree sweep. Moreover, it should be understood that numerous embodiments can have a variety of transitions between the main body of the rim and the relief feature. For example, some relief features may have a smooth or gradual transition, such as, for example, in embodiments where the relief feature is a thinned portion of the rim. Other embodiments may have smooth or rounded edges indicating the location of the relief feature. Some embodiments of the relief feature, like the “V” shaped notch may have sharp transition edges between the body of the rim and the feature. Likewise, it should be understood that transitions can be smooth or gradual and that any transitions can be used individually or in combination with other transitions in accordance with various embodiments.
DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS
[0075] As can be inferred from the above discussion, the above-mentioned concepts can be implemented in a variety of arrangements in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Specifically, menstrual devices with multiple durometer type materials that improve the form, fit, and function of the devices are illustrated. Achieving such functionality, according to embodiments, involves the implementation of special arrangements/designs between subsystems described above, and their equivalents.
[0076] Accordingly, although the present invention has been described in certain specific aspects, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.